Flooding in South Beach, Miami Beach. Climate change? Strangely repeated accident? Photo by maxstrz on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 10 links for you. Unsafe without adult supervision. I’m charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Advertisers don’t care about fake news sites • Medium

Rob Leathern:

»

Advertisers I’m seeing on this page include Air China, King Soopers, TruthFinder, Grammarly, and App Annie (all via Google), Norton (via Conversant), Spoutable, and of course the Revcontent clickbait ads.

The creation and distribution of fake and misleading news and disinformation is being financed by these ad networks. It’s almost impossible for an advertiser to audit this effectively, so my guess is most advertisers don’t care yet about being on these kinds of sites alongside fake news.
When display advertising exchanges and networks were flooded by lots of new low-cost traffic from piracy/download sites 5+ years ago, for the first year or two they were full of ad networks arbitraging brand advertising, until advertisers and their agencies eventually forced accountability and action (even still, arbitrage and redirection of this traffic through hidden iframes) persisted and still does.

Perhaps it takes a while for the screenshots to filter up through the ad agency-industrial complex to arrive in the email inbox of some CMO or SVP of Marketing at the client, or for self-same SVP to visit those questionable sites from a shared link, their own retargeting cookies making sure they see their own brand on the site…

But it’s going to happen, and once big brand advertisers do care about fake news, so will the rest of the ad ecosystem follow.

«

link to this extract

Ad executives brace for possible post-election ad spending slowdown • WSJ

Suzanne Vranica:

»

“Uncertainty is bad for ad spending growth,” said Jonathan Barnard, head of forecasting for Zenith, an ad buying and research arm of Publicis Groupe. Still, he said there will not be an “apocalyptic pullback” and just how much contraction occurs depends largely on how the economy performs and what specific moves the new administration makes.

If Mr. Trump follows through on some campaign promises such as his pledge to overhaul trade treaties and deport illegal immigrants then “we could see a slowdown in economic growth, which will hurt ad spending, Mr. Barnard added.

Any policy affecting the auto industry could have major ramifications since the sector is the largest driver of ad spending in the U.S. Mr. Trump has threatened to slap 35% tariffs on cars imported from Mexico.

“It’s plausible that if tariffs are applied there will be a countrywide impact but there are also specific sectors that may be punished like autos,” and that could hurt ad expenditures, said Brian Wieser, senior research analyst at Pivotal Research Group. “It depends on policy and that is a massive wild card right now.”

«

Well golly.
link to this extract

Apple’s newest MacBook Pro generated 7x more online revenue than MacBook at launch • Slice Intelligence

Taylor Stanton of Slice, which looks at the emails landing in peoples’ inboxes:

»

The new MacBook Pro is here, and Slice Intelligence reports that in the first five days of availability online, the latest model generated over seven times the revenue that the MacBook 12-inch did during its April 2015 launch. The new model’s sales already equal 78% of all the revenue generated by the MacBook 12-inch since it became available, and has accumulated more revenue than any other laptop this year.

This successful launch may be luring those who have abandoned Apple back to the brand. Touch-screen technology has been deployed by other laptop brands for years and shoppers looking for the newest technology would have to move away from Apple to try the new tech.

«

Surface Book looking a bit poky there. But it’s taking the top end of the Windows market.

link to this extract

In the rush to blame Facebook come the calls to suppress ideas people disagree with • Techdirt

Mike Masnick:

»

In 1876, opponents of Rutherford B. Hayes spread the rumor that he had shot his own mother. In 1928, supporters of Herbert Hoover started spreading rumors that (the Catholic) Al Smith was connecting the newly built Holland Tunnel in NY all the way to the Vatican so that the Pope would weigh in on all Presidential matters. In 1952, Dwight Eisenhower supporters distributed pamphlets claiming that his opponent, Adlai Stephenson had once killed a young girl “in a jealous rage.”

Point being: fake news is spread in basically every election for the US President in history. It didn’t take Facebook’s algorithms, and it won’t go away if Facebook’s algorithms change.

In fact, it’s likely to make things even worse. Remember the mostly made up “controversy” about Facebook suppressing conservative news? Remember the outrage it provoked (or have you already forgotten?). Just imagine what would happen if Facebook now decided that it was only going to let people share “true” news. Whoever gets to decide that kind of thing has tremendous power – and there will be immediately claims of bias and hiding “important” stories – even if they’re bullshit. It will lead many of the people who are already angry about things to argue that their views are being suppressed and hidden and that they are being “censored.” That’s not a good recipe. And it’s an especially terrible recipe if people really want to understand why so many people are so angry at the status quo.

Telling them that the news needs to be censored to “protect” them isn’t going to magically turn Trump supporters into Hillary supporters. It will just convince them that they’re even more persecuted.

«

link to this extract

‘Web Of Trust’ browser add-on caught selling users’ data — uninstall it now • Hacker News

»

Web of Trust has been offering a “Safe Web Search & Browsing” service since 2007. The WOT browser extension, which is available for both Firefox and Chrome, uses crowdsourcing to rate websites based on trustworthiness and child safety.

However, it turns out that the Web of Trust service collects extensive data about netizens’ web browsing habits via its browser add-on and then sells them off to various third party companies.

What’s extremely worrying? Web of Trust did not properly anonymize the data it collects on its users, which means it is easy to expose your real identity and every detail about you.

The WOT Privacy Policy states that your IP address, geo-location, the type of device, operating system, and browser you use, the date and time, Web addresses, and browser usage are all collected, but they are in “non-identifiable” format.

However, NDR found that it was very easy to link the anonymized data to its individual users.

The reporters focused on just a small data sample of around 50 WOT users, and were able to retrieve a lot of data, which included:
• Account name
• Mailing address
• Shopping habits
• Travel plans
• Possible illnesses
• Sexual preferences
• Drug consumption
• Confidential company information
• Ongoing police investigations
• Browser surfing activity including all sites visited

This data belonged to just 50 users, and WOT has more than 140m users.

«

Door to empty stable, consider yourself bolted.
link to this extract

The first ever photograph of light as both a particle and wave • PhysOrg

»

A research team led by Fabrizio Carbone at EPFL has now carried out an experiment with a clever twist: using electrons to image light. The researchers have captured, for the first time ever, a single snapshot of light behaving simultaneously as both a wave and a stream of particles.

The experiment is set up like this: A pulse of laser light is fired at a tiny metallic nanowire. The laser adds energy to the charged particles in the nanowire, causing them to vibrate. Light travels along this tiny wire in two possible directions, like cars on a highway. When waves traveling in opposite directions meet each other they form a new wave that looks like it is standing in place. Here, this standing wave becomes the source of light for the experiment, radiating around the nanowire.

This is where the experiment’s trick comes in: The scientists shot a stream of electrons close to the nanowire, using them to image the standing wave of light. As the electrons interacted with the confined light on the nanowire, they either sped up or slowed down. Using the ultrafast microscope to image the position where this change in speed occurred, Carbone’s team could now visualize the standing wave, which acts as a fingerprint of the wave-nature of light.

«

Science!

link to this extract

Trump picks top climate skeptic to lead EPA transition • Scientific American

Robin Bravender:

»

Myron Ebell, director of the Center for Energy and Environment at the conservative Competitive Enterprise Institute, is spearheading Trump’s transition plans for EPA, the sources said.

The Trump team has also lined up leaders for its Energy Department and Interior Department teams. Republican energy lobbyist Mike McKenna is heading the DOE team; former Interior Department solicitor David Bernhardt is leading the effort for that agency, according to sources close to the campaign.

Ebell is a well-known and polarizing figure in the energy and environment realm. His participation in the EPA transition signals that the Trump team is looking to drastically reshape the climate policies the agency has pursued under the Obama administration. Ebell’s role is likely to infuriate environmentalists and Democrats but buoy critics of Obama’s climate rules.

Ebell, who was dubbed an “elegant nerd” and a “policy wonk” by Vanity Fair, is known for his prolific writings that question what he calls climate change “alarmism.” He appears frequently in the media and before Congress. He’s also chairman of the Cooler Heads Coalition, a group of nonprofits that “question global warming alarmism and oppose energy-rationing policies.”

«

Perhaps Ebell would like to put his money where his mouth is by moving to Miami Beach. (It’s reached via a causeway just off Miami.) Also: natural processes don’t care whether you believe in them or not. They’ll occur regardless.
link to this extract

Scottish island to use spare TV spectrum to speed up broadband • Wired

James Temperton:

»

Spare wireless spectrum leftover from the digital TV switchover will be used to improve broadband access on the Scottish island of Arran.

The rollout, the first of its kind in Europe, will be used to improve broadband speeds for the island’s 5,000 residents. It’s hoped the use of TV white space can help bridge the urban-rural broadband divide and better connect the UK’s more remote communities.

The technology is being rolled-out through a partnership between internet firm Nominet and broadband campaign group Broadway Partners. TV white space has been trialled and teased as a potentially useful technology ever since vast swathes became available when the UK completed its move to digital TV in October 2012.

As TV white space is near-ubiquitous, and easy to access, it doesn’t require expensive additional infrastructure to launch new services on it. The commercial roll-out on Arran will, according to Nominet, bring relatively high data-rates across the island.

«

link to this extract

Twitter’s chief operating officer to step down • The New York Times

Mike Isaac:

»

For many months, Twitter has been trying to reshape itself as a growing social media service. That attempt now includes reshaping the company’s top ranks.

On Wednesday, Twitter said that Adam Bain, its chief operating officer, plans to leave the company. Mr. Bain was well liked by Wall Street for building up and running Twitter’s once fast-growing advertising business.

Many of Mr. Bain’s duties and his direct lieutenants, including those who manage ad sales and partnerships with marketers and broadcast media companies, will be under the purview of Anthony Noto, Twitter’s chief financial officer. Mr. Noto will take on the chief operating officer title, and Twitter said it would begin a search for a new chief financial officer.

“The past six years have been incredible, and I’m inspired by what Twitter has become and what it will be in the future,” Mr. Bain said in a statement.

«

I don’t feel that this is an encouraging sign, and certainly not for those remaining at Twitter. Bain had been there since 2010. Noto has been there since 2014. Expect more job cuts and more aggressive attempts to monetise tweets. I get the feeling that the horizon of Twitter’s ambitions has shrunk dramatically in the past six months.
link to this extract

Google could ban third-party fast charging hardware in upcoming Android phones AndroidAuthority

John Callaham:

»

updated documentation from Google clearly wants smartphone makers to stick with the USB Power Delivery standards that are used on its own Pixel phones:

»

Type-C devices are STRONGLY RECOMMENDED to not support proprietary charging methods that modify Vbus voltage beyond default levels, or alter sink/source roles as such may result in interoperability issues with the chargers or devices that support the standard USB Power Delivery methods. While this is called out as “STRONGLY RECOMMENDED”, in future Android versions we might REQUIRE all type-C devices to support full interoperability with standard type-C chargers.

«

That last sentence should be a pretty clear warning that Google could clamp down on these outside fast charging technologies offered by Qualcomm, OPPO, MediaTek and others in the near future.

«

Perhaps also lookin’ at you, Samsung 🔥🔥🔥. However: on what basis does Google get to dictate this?
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Too many bubbles in the tech world? Photo by Charos Pix on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each weekday’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 10 links for you. Keep calm and carry on. I’m charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Trump victory could mean tougher times for tech • The Information

Reed Albergotti:

»

Mr. Trump is widely viewed as a wild card among people involved in tech policy. He’s been vague about most policy areas, making it tough for anyone to be sure what he will do. But with Republicans in control of both houses of Congress, he will have a lot of power.

And during his campaign he was hostile towards several parts of the tech industry. He took aim at the H1-B immigration program, which tech companies lean on heavily to hire foreign workers. His official platform called for U.S. companies to try to hire American workers first. Bolstering his calls for companies to consider “America first,” he’s also advocated for companies like Apple to make hardware in the United States rather than China.

He’s also called for a boycott of Apple unless it ceded to FBI demands that it build a “back door” to the iPhone so the agency could read texts sent by the San Bernardino terrorists. Mr. Trump has attacked Amazon chief Jeff Bezos, claiming the company doesn’t pay “fair taxes.” His broader “law and order” campaign themes suggest he could be more forceful against tech companies, while President Obama and Hillary Clinton looked to balance national security with privacy.

«

Ben Thompson, in Stratechery (you should subscribe, honest) also points out that a Trump repeal of Obamacare would make it harder for people to have their own health insurance, and so stymie the “gig economy” and entrepreneurship. Meanwhile, Trump’s policy is to allow money held overseas to be repatriated cheaply, and to lower taxes on companies.
link to this extract

DDOS attack halts heating in Finland’s winter • Metropolitan.fi

»

Both of the buildings where managed by Valtia. The company who is in charge of managing the buildings overall operation and maintenance. According to Valtia CEO, Simo Rounela, in both cases the systems that controlled the central heating and warm water circulation were temporarily disabled.

In the city of Lappeenranta, there were at least two buildings whose systems were knocked down by the network attack. In a DDoS attack the network is overloaded by traffic from multiple locations with the aim of causing the system to fail.

In an interview with Etelä-Saimaa, Rounela estimated the attack in Eastern Finland lasted from late October to Thursday the 3rd of November. The systems that were attacked tried to respond to the attack by rebooting the main control circuit. This was repeated over and over so that heating was never working.

At this time of the year temperatures in Finland are below freezing and a long-term disruption in heat will cause both material damage as well as the need to relocate residents elsewhere. Thankfully in this case the fix was easy to do by limiting network traffic.

«

Otherwise, they’d have had no heating/hot water until it thawed in spring/summer.
link to this extract

Trump, Twitter, and the failed American experiment • The Currency Paradox

James King:

»

In a real sense, Twitter is rigged. I watched as technologies and algorithms were changed to systematically decrease my reach and influence. I was walled off into my own corner by those who perceived themselves my betters. Neither the accuracy of my observations nor resilience of my concepts mattered, I simply was not one of the popular kids. No amount of truth could change that.

So I find myself on the eve of the presidency of a fascist. It doesn’t surprise me how we got here. We got here because we stopped believing in truth and started believing in systems. Twitter is one such system. We don’t care if the systems are rigged or broken. But no one else seems to understand that the act of rigging a system invalidates it. A broken thing will eventually collapse.

The advantage of a fanatic or demagogue is their ideological purity. They exist in a world in which their beliefs are truth and therefore unassailable. What they do not understand is that there is indeed objective truth, optimal forms of reason and existence that will eventually undermine and destroy any belief that doesn’t adhere to them.

We are likely on the cusp of the failure of the experiment called the United States of America. It is a system that was built on hypocrisy and the blood and exploitation of innocents. Its religion is Capitalism. Much like Twitter, it has been a comforting notion. And, like Twitter, it has failed to fulfill its promise for the majority of people. Re-read my description of my Twitter experience. You may notice how well it parallels the experience of many in this country.

«

link to this extract

News in the age of now • Nieman Reports

Nick Carr:

»

Unlike the printed page, the Web never encourages us to slow down. And the more we practice this hurried, distracted mode of information gathering, the more deeply it becomes ingrained in our mental habits—in the very ways our neurons connect. At the same time, we begin to lose our ability to sustain our attention, to think or read about one thing for more than a few moments. A Stanford University study published last year showed that people who engage in a lot of media multitasking not only sacrifice their capacity for concentration but also become less able to distinguish important information from unimportant information. They become “suckers for irrelevancy,” as one of the researchers, Clifford Nass, put it. Everything starts to blur together.

On the Web, skimming is no longer a means to an end but an end in itself. That poses a huge problem for those who report and publish the news. To appreciate variations in the quality of journalism, a person has to be attentive, to be able to read and think deeply. To the skimmer, all stories look the same and are worth the same. The news becomes a fungible commodity, and the lowest-cost provider wins the day. The news organization committed to quality becomes a niche player, fated to watch its niche continue to shrink.

The fervor of nowness displaces the thoughtfulness of ripeness.

«

link to this extract

Trump can’t stop the energy revolution • Bloomberg Gadfly

Chris Bryant:

»

President-elect Donald Trump thinks man-made climate change is a hoax and he’s promised to revive the US coal industry by cutting regulation. So renewables are dead in the water, right? Maybe not.

President Trump can’t tell producers which power generation technologies to buy. That decision will come down to cost in the end. Right now coal’s losing that battle, while renewables are gaining.

Trump will doubtless try to undermine the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan (CPP), which obliges states to cut fossil power carbon emissions. That would probably keep more coal plants open for longer. But, try as he might, Trump can’t will the coal industry back to health. It will still struggle to compete with cheap natural gas, as Gadfly colleague Liam Denning explained here.Even without the CPP, about 60 gigawatts of coal-fired generating capacity will probably be retired by 2030. On the same basis, renewable capacity would still be expected to grow more than 4% a year until 2040, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, meaning they’d have a 23% share of generation.

«

Technological progress doesn’t care who’s elected. Nor does money.
link to this extract

Who’s better at phishing Twitter, me or artificial intelligence? • Forbes

Thomas Fox-Brewster thought he could easily beat an AI (SNAP_R) when it came to tempting people to click on links on Twitter:

»

I shouldn’t have been so smug. Two days later the results were in. When it came to social engineering, the data showed I’m not of the same calibre as AI. Not only were the SNAP_R bots able to send out far more tweets – obviously computers are quicker than humans when it comes to such rote operations – but they had a greater conversion rate. SNAP_R sent simulated spear-phishing tweets to 819 users at a rate of 6.75 tweets per minute, reeling in 275 victims.

Me? I managed a puny 129 attempts at 1.075 tweets a minute with 49 total click-throughs. I lost by 226. A shattering loss, the second to AI in a matter of days, having been thoroughly pounded by a machine Smash Bros. player in the same week.

As much as it’s useful warning people to be careful with what they click, SNAP_R is more than that; it’s a harbinger of Twitter doom. The prospect of armies of phisher bots that appear human is worrisome. Will any user be able to tell the difference between humans and AI? Will Twitter’s security staff? Given SNAP_R was so successful in its first test against a human, I’m doubtful.

«

Guaranteed that criminals have figured this out already.
link to this extract

Explaining nationalist political views: the case of Donald Trump • SSRN papers

Jonathan Rothwell and Pablo Diego-Rosell of the pollsters Gallup:

»

Using detailed Gallup survey data for 125,000 American adults, we analyze the individual and geographic factors that predict a higher probability of viewing Trump favorably. The results show mixed evidence that economic distress has motivated Trump support. His supporters are less educated and more likely to work in blue collar occupations, but they earn relatively high household incomes and are no less likely to be unemployed or exposed to competition through trade or immigration. On the other hand, living in racially isolated communities with worse health outcomes, lower social mobility, less social capital, greater reliance on social security income and less reliance on capital income, predicts higher levels of Trump support.

«

link to this extract

IPhone 7 and 7 boost iOS share in US • Kantar Comtech

»

“In Great Britain, the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus were top-sellers during the month of September, accounting for 15.1% of sales,” said Dominic Sunnebo, Business Unit Director for Kantar Worldpanel ComTech Europe. “In the third quarter of 2016, iOS accounted for 40.6% of smartphone sales, a 2.4 percentage point increase from the same period a year ago. It’s interesting to note the continued success of the iPhone SE in Britain, accounting for 8.5% of sales in the quarter vs. a share of just 3.5% in the US.”

“Britain is the only market where Samsung made year-on-year gains, totaling 30.4% of smartphone sales,” Sunnebo added. “In Italy, Huawei replaced Samsung as the reigning smartphone leader to become the top brand sold at 27.3%, a 15.2 percentage point gain vs. the third quarter 2015. Samsung accounted for 24.7% of smartphone sales in Italy, a decline from 40.6%. In Spain, Huawei and Samsung are now neck-and-neck, with Samsung edging out Huawei 24.2% vs. 23.3%.”

«

Amazing: Apple plus Samsung equals over 70% of sales in September. Note Huawei, though, which is coming to eat Samsung’s lunch (and quite possibly some of Apple’s dessert).
link to this extract

Inside the loss Clinton saw coming • Politico

Benjamin Oreskes:

»

Democrats and many others are now in crisis, wrapping their minds around the reality of a President Donald Trump. But the crisis is sharpest in Clinton campaign headquarters: not only do they feel like everything is about to go deeply, collapse-of-America wrong, but it’s going to happen because she failed, and they failed her.

Clinton and her operatives went into the race predicting her biggest problems would be inevitability and her age, trying to succeed a two-term president of her own party. But the mood of the country surprised them. They recognized that Sanders and Trump had correctly defined the problem—addressing anger about a rigged economy and government—and that Clinton already never authentically could. Worse still, her continuing email saga and extended revelations about the Clinton Foundation connections made any anti-establishment strategy completely impossible.

So instead of answering the question of how Clinton represented change, they tried to change the question to temperament, what kind of change people wanted, what kind of America they wanted to live in. It wasn’t enough.

«

link to this extract

Election Alphaville: the mood at Web Summit • Financial Times

Izabella Kaminska:

»

In fact, before the [onstage] interview — when I asked [Cisco chairman John] Chambers [who calls himself a moderate Republican but voted for Clinton and her “digital strategy”] about how his disruptive vision would be received by those likely to be left behind — he had urged me not to dwell on the “negatives” because that’s not what the crowds wanted to hear.

It was at this point I realised that what I was witnessing at the Web Summit was the manifestation of the biggest and most self-deluding feedback loop of all time.

The crowd had its own preconceived notion about how great disruption was, about how important being “agile” is, and why the downsides of the tech revolution just don’t matter. They didn’t want to hear anything else. They saw themselves as representing the innovative and disruptive future, whilst those moaning about the social disruption associated with the tech revolution represent the luddite past.

What they perhaps didn’t realise is that the division doesn’t necessarily represent a simple clash between futurist progressives and technophobic regressives. More likely, it represents a clash between the bubble elite — the increasingly concentrated beneficiaries of the tech revolution — and everyone else, who they just don’t care for.

Web Summit is a bubble. And the people in that bubble have no idea they’re in a bubble (even though they’re repeatedly going around saying the exact same thing to each other as if in a trance). With the US election playing out in Donald Trump’s favour, there’s a good chance those inhabiting that bubble may finally be forced out of it.

«

link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Lucky you! Ads are coming to Messenger bots. Photo by portalgda on Flickr.

A selection of 11 links for you. Happy don’t-have-to-think-about-US-elections-for-four-years-or-so day. I’m charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Alphabet taps brakes on drone project, nixing Starbucks partnership • Bloomberg

Mark Bergen:

»

The latest Google drones have just started taking flight in the real world. But the team behind the technology is slowing down, trimming headcount and shelving initiatives as the experimental unit becomes the latest target of tightening budgets across parent company Alphabet Inc. 

Project Wing, a unit of Alphabet’s X research lab, nixed a partnership with coffee giant Starbucks Corp., according to people familiar with the decision. Following the departure of project leader Dave Vos in October, the unit also froze hiring and began asking some staff to seek jobs elsewhere in the company, according to some of those people. They asked not to be identified speaking about private company moves. 

The decisions are part of a broader Alphabet effort to rein in spending and try to turn more experimental projects from loss-making risky bets into real businesses. Drones are in a particularly knotty place. US federal regulation does not yet allow for delivery, except in select test zones. However, Alphabet’s deceleration comes as other technology companies, including Amazon.com Inc., plough money into drone delivery.

«

The Wall Street Journal says that the top two Wing execs were “pushed out”, “in large part because of conflict between the group’s engineers and its commercial team”.

Boston Dynamics, Google Glass, Google Fiber – what’s the betting the next one to get a spending cut will be Project Loon, the internet-balloons-for-developing-countries scheme?

(Benedict Evans reckons the cuts are because Google is going all-in on machine learning. It would make sense.)
link to this extract

Why Twitter must be saved • Stratechery

Ben Thompson:

»

When information was scarce, limiting speech was a real danger; when information is abundant shielding people from speech they might disagree with has its own perverse effects.

To be clear, Twitter has a real abuse problem that it has been derelict in addressing, a decision that is costly in both human and business terms; there is real harm that comes from the ability to address anyone anonymously, including the suppression of viewpoints by de facto vigilantism. But I increasingly despair about the opposite extreme: the construction of cocoons where speech that intrudes on one’s world view with facts is suppressed for fear of what it does to the bottom line, resulting in an inert people incapable of finding common ground with anyone else.

This is why Twitter must be saved: the combination of network and format is irreplaceable, especially now that everyone knows it might not be a great business. For all the good that the Washington Post has done it is but one publication among many; the place where those publications disseminate information is the true scale, but Facebook has made its priorities clear: engagement and dollars, leavened with the certainty that engineers can make it all better; the externalities that result from a focus on making people feel good are not their concern.

«

The panel which I moderated on Tuesday at Web Summit felt that Facebook in particular should act to steer away from the model where it simply monetises attention without any regard to verity or effects.
link to this extract

Demand for USB Type-C to pick up with more notebook adoption, says paper • Digitimes

Joseph Tsai:

»

Market watchers expect Apple’s decision to fully adopt USB Type-C connectors for its new MacBook Pros to accelerate other notebook vendors’ adoption of USB Type-C technology in their products which should benefit connector makers including BizLink Holding, Good Way Technology and Foxlink, according to a Chinese-language Economic Daily News (EDN) report.

Tom Huang, Investor Relation Manager, BizLink said that mobile device I/O ports will become fewer and fewer and docking station-type of products will become more popular. BizLink has been cooperating with clients to develop USB Type C-related applications and these businesses are expected to become growth drivers for the company, the paper noted.

«

Gotta love those market watchers.
link to this extract

Why are Skype accounts getting hacked so easily? • The Verge

Tom Warren:

»

If you’ve received a weird message on Skype with a link to Baidu or LinkedIn recently, you’re not alone. In the past couple of weeks, I’ve received spam links to Baidu from six of my Skype contacts, one of whom works for Microsoft’s PR agency and another is a former Microsoft employee. All were surprised to see their accounts breached, and some believed they were protected by Microsoft’s two-factor authentication. That wasn’t the case, though.

A thread on Microsoft’s Skype support forums reveals this has been occurring to hundreds of Skype users since at least August. Breached Skype accounts are used to send thousands of spam messages before they’re locked and the owners have to regain access. Skype has fallen victim to similar attacks before, and hackers were able to spoof messages on the system last year after using lists of stolen usernames and passwords to gain access to accounts.

«

So why isn’t two-factor authentication working?

»

Skype users might think they’re protected by Microsoft’s two-factor security, when in reality they’re probably not. Microsoft offers the ability to link a Skype and Microsoft Account together to make sign-in and security easier. If you already enabled this months ago, it turns out that Microsoft has kept your original Skype account password separate so that it can still be used to access the service with a Skype username. If that password isn’t secure or you used it elsewhere then hackers can use it to gain access to Skype, bypassing any two-factor authentication provided by Microsoft.

«

link to this extract

Google stops AdSense attack that forced banking trojan on Android phones • Ars Technica

Dan Goodin:

»

Google has shut down an operation that combined malicious AdSense advertisements with a zero-day attack exploiting Chrome for Android to force devices to download banking fraud malware.

Over a two-month span, the campaign downloaded the Banker.AndroidOS.Svpeng banking trojan on about 318,000 devices monitored by Kaspersky Lab, researchers from the Moscow-based anti-malware provider reported in a blog post published Monday. While the malicious installation files weren’t automatically executed, they carried names such as last-browser-update.apk and WhatsApp.apk that were designed to trick targets into manually installing them. Kaspersky privately reported the scam to Google, and engineers from the search company put an end to the campaign, although the timing of those two events wasn’t immediately clear.

“So far, those behind Svpeng have limited their attacks to smartphone users in Russia,” Kaspersky Lab researchers Nikita Buchka and Anton Kivva wrote in Monday’s post. “However, next time they push their ‘adverts’ on AdSense they may well choose to attack users in other countries; we have seen similar cases in the past. After all, what could be more convenient than exploiting the most popular advertising platform to download their malicious creations to hundreds of thousands of mobile devices?”

«

Only works on Google Chrome for Android; exploits AdSense; exploits Android. Quite the trifecta. (Exploits like this, of course, are part of the externality cost of advertising on users, besides attention and bandwidth.)
link to this extract

With Theranos lawsuit, Walgreens hoping to squeeze single drop of blood from stone • Dealbreaker

Owen Davis:

»

When it comes to entries in the it-couldn’t-possibly-get-any-worse department, Theranos has become a true standout. So it’s a bit of a bummer that the latest turn of events for the embattled blood testing startup occurred late on election day, when most eyes are trained elsewhere.

As intrepid WSJ reporter John Carreyrou reports, via Twitter, Walgreens has filed a $140m lawsuit against Theranos. It’s not the first lawsuit to follow revelations that the company’s once-vaunted technology – which promised to test for a wide array of ailments using a single drop of blood – may have been a giant sham all along. A hedge fund investor got that ball rolling last month.

«

Put it on the gravestone.
link to this extract

Here’s Facebook’s plan to get you chatting with Messenger business bots • Buzzfeed News

Alex Kantrowitz:

»

The first tweak is a simple one: News Feed advertisements designed to engage you in conversation with a chat bot. Let’s say H&M is touting a new line of winter coats in a Facebook ad campaign. Instead of directing people interested in the coats to H&M’s website or the H&M app, these ads would put them in conversation with Messenger’s H&M chat bot, which could answer questions about the coats and potentially orchestrate an in-app sale. These ads roll out globally today.

Facebook’s second tweak, sponsored messages, also rolls out globally today. These are exactly what they say on the tin: branded in-Messenger messages sent to Messenger users by advertisers they’ve interacted with in the past. Together with bot-integrated News Feed ads, these new products offer developers opportunities to more proactively engage people on Facebook.

“We now have the ability to drive massive traffic to bots through News Feed,” Facebook Messenger head David Marcus told BuzzFeed News, “and that’s great for developers.” Marcus noted that these new products have worked well in test runs. Absolut Vodka, for example, recently used a bot-integrated News Feed ad as part of a vodka giveaway campaign. Marcus said the company found that acceptance rates on Messenger were three times what they were on the mobile web.

«

Sounds delightful. Also, don’t worry – rather like banner ads, I’d wager the “acceptance rate” will fall fairly quickly as they become ubiquitous and people weary of them.
link to this extract

Decision 2016: counting the vote • Associated Press

Lauren Easton spoke to Don Rehill, who is in charge of the AP’s collection of voting data:

»

We’ll be tabulating almost 5,000 contested races from over 4,600 reporting units in 50 states, plus Washington, D.C. The states and counties that do provide unofficial results do so in myriad formats and in a variety of ways. Our reporting is based on a spectrum of reporting modes, from an AP stringer at a town election official’s office calling our vote entry center with results given to him on a printout; to a county election official faxing or emailing us a tally receipt from their optical scanner; to folks at one of our centers manually gathering results from a county website; to a secretary of state elections office sending us XML documents with the most recent updates in all of their counties. Even within a state, we often get results on different media, and in different formats, because of differences in the counties’ election equipment, their procedures or their budgets.

As developers and folks involved in compiling election data like to say, there is no “common data format.” At AP we essentially take this crazy quilt of formats and we create our own common data format to process it. Then we run it through our quality control checks, and format and disseminate the results in a variety of ways to our thousands of newspaper, broadcast and digital members and customers.

«

You don’t see Google or Facebook hurrying to take that over.
link to this extract

Google says it is now OK to put content behind tabs • Search Engine Journal

Matt Southern:

»

It sounds like that [exchange on Twitter, mentioned in the story] means we can disregard the knowledge previously thought to be true when Google’s John Mueller stated crawlers may “actively ignore” content that is “hidden”:

»“From our point of view, it’s always a tricky problem when we send a user to a page where we know this content is actually hidden. Because the user will see perhaps the content in the snippet, they’ll click through the page, and say, well, I don’t see where this information is on this page. I feel kind of almost misled to click on this to actually get in there. So that’s…the problem that we’re seeing. …we’ve gone a little bit further now to actively ignore the information that’s not directly visible. So if you want that content really indexed, I’d make sure it’s visible for the users when they go to that page.”«

So, there you have it. Time to update your technical audits, checklists, and so on. Click-to-expand content, and content hidden behind tabs, are not negative SEO factors anymore.

«

This doesn’t feel like good news. Does this feel like good news to you? I envisage lots more having to click things to make them go away.
link to this extract

Boffins turn phone into GPS tracker by abusing pairing with – that’s right – IoT kit • The Register

John Leyden:

»

Black Hat EU Security researchers have worked out how to hack into a smartphone and turn it into a tracking device by abusing its pairing with a Belkin home automation device.

Joe Tanen and Scott Tenaglia of Invincea Labs were able to root a WeMo device before injecting code into the WeMo Android app from a compromised WeMo device. The attack, which involved using an IoT device to hack into a phone, involved abusing normal functionality in order to exploit the app, the researchers explained during a presentation at Black Hat Europe on Friday.

Vulnerabilities in both the device and the Android app can be abused to obtain a root shell on the device, before running arbitrary code on the phone paired with it. The same approach might be used to crash the device, and launch DoS attacks without rooting it.

“We were able to turn your phone into a GPS tracker because your IoT kit is kinda insecure,” Tenaglia explained.

The talk – entitled Breaking BHAD: Abusing Belkin Home Automation Devices – also covered details of heap overflow, SQL injection, and code injection zero days, as well as their associated exploits. These various flaws were resolved by a recent update from Belkin.

«

link to this extract

Apple picked up talent, tech from defunct music startup Omnifone in August • Techcrunch

Ingrid Lunden:

»

As the race continues to pick up more subscribers for streaming music services, TechCrunch has learned that one of the most prominent players in the field quietly picked up some talent and tech to advance its position. Apple hired at least 16 employees and purchased select technology from Omnifone, an early player in streaming music services that filed for bankruptcy this summer.

The news emerged as Omnifone’s original founder, Rob Lewis (who was no longer with Omnifone in its final years), prepares for his latest streaming music venture, Electric Jukebox, to launch its first product this week: a music player that plugs into your TV, and a controller that looks a little like a microphone.

«

Do we think Rob is soon going to be hoping to be acquihired? But this is early consolidation. The list of streaming music services that have gone bust is already quite long.
link to this extract

You can now sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

They’re breeding! Photo by rexhammock on Flickr.

You can now sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 12 links for you. Don’t vote for them. I’m charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

After 20 minutes of listening, new Adobe tool can make you say anything • Motherboard

Matthew Gault:

»

When Adobe released Photoshop in 1990, it dreamed of a world where movie studios and photo editors could do in minutes what once took hours. It never dreamed the world would take the digital editor and use it to put celebrity heads on porn star bodies, distort women’s bodies in magazine cover, and create vile memes.

Now, the same company that gave the world Photoshop wants to do for the human voice what it did for the human image—give people the tools to warp it in anyway they see fit. At the Adobe Max Creativity Conference, the company premiered VoCo: an audio editing suite that will allow users to make people say whatever they want just by typing.

According to Adobe, after about 20 minutes of listening to a voice, users can make the voice say whatever they want just by typing it out. Comedian and director Jordan Peele hosted the event and Adobe tech Zeyu Jin demoed the process by editing an interview with Peele’s comedic partner Keegan-Michael Key. Jin took existing audio of Key, then used the software to make him talk about making out with Peele instead of his wife.

«

Concerning, surely. Who’s going to believe a Trump soundtrack now?
link to this extract

Samsung tests button for improved AI feature on Galaxy S8 phone – WSJ

Eun-Young Jeong and Jonathan Cheng:

»

[Samsung] Executives are now looking to delay the announcement of the Galaxy S8 until after the Mobile World Congress trade show in late February next year, the people said. One of these people said the unveiling could come as late as April. That would mark a break from the past three years, when Samsung used the tech showcase in Barcelona to unveil its newest top-of-the-line Galaxy S smartphones.

A spokesman for Samsung declined to comment.

The delayed launch highlights Samsung’s efforts to ensure that its next product is a hit with consumers. The world’s largest smartphone maker by sales is in dire need of a rebound, as the Galaxy Note 7 debacle has already cost the company more than $5 billion.

Tweaking the design of its most important product line to highlight one feature would underscore Samsung’s ambitions in the growing market for digital assistants.

«

“Samsung tests button” may be my new favourite headline fragment. That delay, though, will hit Q1 sales.
link to this extract

New Apple MacBooks: are you not entertained? • Forbes

Patrick Moorhead makes a good point: why isn’t there LTE support on the new laptops?

»

The new MacBooks are very thin, powerful and mobile. The exception to this mobility is that they don’t support integrated LTE. This has always been a head-scratcher for me when you consider Apple’s iPads do. The new MacBooks are the most expensive notebooks on the market and therefore cater to a premium audience who want it all. 1Gbps LTE could literally give wireline-speed to users. Qualcomm has been shipping X15 chips for a while now, OEMs are integrating them and services are starting to spring up, too. I wrote that about here.

I don’t buy the argument that users can just use their smartphone if they want. Otherwise, why would iPads have LTE options? Adding LTE does add some extra time for homologation, but not more than it does on an iPad. LTE does add antenna complexity, but certainly no more than an iPhone or iPad which has much less antenna routing real estate. Additionally, having integrated LTE would also be more secure than using public Wi-Fi or a Wi-Fi hotspot.

«

link to this extract

The Trump campaign’s war on reality made me question what I saw • Washington Post

Ben Terris:

»

“I just want to make sure,” my editor asked me as he closed the door to his office. “He definitely grabbed her?”

It had to be the 50th time I’d heard this question, and each time it filled me with unspeakable anxiety.

Yes, he grabbed her. It happened three days earlier, in the chandelier-lit ballroom of Donald Trump’s golf club in Jupiter, Fla. Trump had just won the state’s primary, and he was celebrating in a ballroom full of Trump-branded products: steaks, water, even a magazine.

After the speech, Michelle Fields, a reporter for Breitbart, approached Trump with a question about affirmative action, when Corey Lewandowski, then Trump’s campaign manager, took her by the arm and yanked her from the candidate.

It happened right in front of me.

And yet, even though I saw it, the Trump team’s response — to claim it never happened at all — would become a small preview of a strategy the campaign would return to again and again on a much larger scale this year: Bully, don’t back down, do whatever you can to muddy up the facts. It was a type of lie that has lived at the center of the Trump campaign. This was not simply a misreading of history, an embellishment of biography, or a dishonest interpretation of a piece of legislation. It was a flat-out denial of something that undeniably happened.

«

link to this extract

Here’s how the Tescobank hack went down • L33t Mark

“An infosec guy” on how 20,000 Tesco bank accounts had money stolen from them over the weekend:

»

It seems highly likely bordering on certain that the source of the suspicious transactions was the TescoBank online bank portal. The internet banking portal has been taken down. I think it’s almost certain that the criminals behind this gained non-administrative access to user accounts through vulnerabilities in the online bank website. Why?

Let’s assume a financial motive is behind this attack and that whoever did it did not just shuffle money around on accounts. The fact that some accounts experienced transfers of money but no losses indicate funnelling. For online banking, it is normal to have to request the right to move money to foreign countries. Sometimes you can change this setting yourself online (possibly validating using 2FA), sometimes you have to submit a request have it changed.

In today’s Tescobank case it seems that the criminals were identifying accounts that had the correct rights to move money to accounts in countries/banks of their choice and control (via money mules maybe). So the criminals got access to funnel transfers to accounts that could then probably move amounts overseas, where I supposed money mules retrieved as much of this as possible before it was locked down by TescoBank. This means that money from my account went to -> Small Corp X that often transfers to Russia -> To an account in for example a Russian bank.

It also seems that the criminals executed a large amount of non-random transfers over a period of hours, transfers that could probably, given their level of access, have been largely automated. It seems they may have done extensive research, set up scripts to calculate or read amounts on accounts and then set up transfers to move the money from source accounts to funnel accounts to destination accounts over a period of hours. Maybe a too rapid move would be caught too quickly and remove their ability to profit from this.

«

20,000 accounts of 40,000 that were accessed had money taken; out of about 136,000 accounts. If this was the website, then Tesco has no business keeping its online bank open, and I’d encourage anyone to remove their money. (I’d suggest that anyway, to be honest.) I also understand, from an Overspill reader, that Tesco didn’t require two-factor authentication to set up a new direct payment from your account. This is such elementary security that it should be a legal requirement.
link to this extract

Media’s next challenge: overcoming the threat of fake news • New York Times

Jim Rutenberg:

»

That contraction in the reporting corps, combined with the success of disinformation this year, is making for some sleepless nights for those in Washington who will have to govern in this bifurcated, real-news-fake-news environment.

“It’s the biggest crisis facing our democracy, the failing business model of real journalism,” Senator Claire McCaskill, Democrat of Missouri and a longtime critic of fake news, told me on Saturday.

Ms. McCaskill said that “journalism is partly to blame” for being slow to adjust as the internet turned its business model upside down and social media opened the competitive floodgates. “Fake news got way out ahead of them,” she said.

It does not augur well for the future. Martin Baron, the Washington Post executive editor, said when we spoke last week, “If you have a society where people can’t agree on basic facts, how do you have a functioning democracy?”

«

There’s going to be a huge hangover after the fizz of the advertising around the US election.
link to this extract

Yes, Donald Trump, the FBI can vet 650,000 emails in eight days • Wired

Andy Greenberg:

»

“You can’t review 650,000 emails in eight days,” Trump said Sunday in a campaign speech in Michigan hours after Comey’s latest update to Congress came out. “You can’t do it, folks. Hillary Clinton is guilty.” Trump supporter General Michael Flynn did the math on Twitter, [suggesting it was impossible].

But fortunately for Comey’s eyesight—and for Clinton’s presidential campaign—Trump is wrong: the FBI can review hundreds of thousands of emails in a week, using automated search and filtering tools rather than Flynn’s absurd notion of Comey reading the documents manually. “This is not rocket science,” says Jonathan Zdziarski, a forensics expert who’s consulted for law enforcement and worked as a systems administrator. “Eight days is more than enough time to pull this off in a responsible way.”

One former FBI forensics expert even tells WIRED he’s personally assessed far larger collections of data, far faster. “You can triage a dataset like this in a much shorter amount of time,” says the former agent, who asked to remain anonymous to avoid any political backlash. “We’d routinely collect terabytes of data in a search. I’d know what was important before I left the guy’s house.”

«

Might be a vain hope to think this is the last we’re ever going to hear of this. But let’s close our eyes and try.
link to this extract

The US and fiscal indulgences • The Economist

From 2011, by “W.W.” (Economist writers are always anonymous):

»

Mr [Michael] Munger [professor of political science at Duke University, who says that the US dispenses tax breaks like the Catholic church used to dispense “indulgences” for money] observes that America’s blockheaded debt-ceiling debate flows in part from a bipartisan commitment to the medieval theology of our tax code:

»The Republicans in Congress are prepared to sacrifice our immortal debt rating to the proposition that not one penny increase is possible, even though almost no one actually pays those rates. The Democrats in Congress like high rates, so that they can sell indulgences.«

Republicans depend on selling indulgences, too, Mr Munger is keen to stress. Bowles-Simpson recommended closing some of the tax code’s most egregious loopholes. But the political incentives led President Obama to refuse the chance to go after tax expenditures; he has mostly pushed for higher rates. This is all incredibly depressing. You know we’re in trouble when Mr Munger, one of our sharpest scholars of political economy, is unable to offer useful advice beyond calling for a reformation, “a Martin Luther to speak out and tell the truth”.

«

Thanks to Overspill reader JZ for this – though I think it misses the teleological element: Americans hate the idea of their money being spent to help other people, even their countrymen (and women).
link to this extract

I have lived the USB-C #donglelife. Here’s what you’re in for • The Verge

Dieter Bohn:

»

I have been using USB-C for a year now, on the non-Pro MacBook, so I thought I should share some of my experiences. And I want to tell you that the #donglelife (yes, it’s a hashtag) is not all that horrible for me, day-to-day. That’s in large part because I am smack in the center of Apple’s target market: I don’t need to plug stuff beyond power into my computer all that often, so when I do it’s not too big a hassle to use a dongle. And much to my surprise, I don’t miss MagSafe as much as I expected to. If I were a photographer or video director who needs to use SD cards constantly and who already has a cache of hard drives that require different ports, it might be a different story.

I feel strange defending dongles, because you can and should count me among the people who think that removing the headphone port from the iPhone 7 was a user hostile mistake. But for me, the big difference between needing dongles for your laptop and needing dongles for your phone is that you usually carry your laptop around in a bag, which has pockets that can carry dongles.

I should also point out that I am a USB-C partisan. The dream of this single port was and always has been that you will be able to stop carrying around a different cable for every. damn. gadget. you. own. We do not live in that world yet, but I’ve experienced bits and pieces of it and I genuinely think a little pain now is worth it for that better future.

«

BURN THE HERETIC!
link to this extract

WikiLeaks isn’t whistleblowing • The New York Times

Zeynep Tufekci:

»

Wanton destruction of the personal privacy of any person who has ever come near a political organization is a vicious but effective means to smother dissent. This method is so common in Russia and the former Soviet states that it has a name: “kompromat,” releasing compromising material against political opponents. Emails of dissidents are hacked, their houses bugged, the activities in their bedrooms videotaped, and the material made public to embarrass and intimidate people whose politics displeases the powerful. Kompromat does not have to go after every single dissident to work: If you know that getting near politics means that your personal privacy may be destroyed, you will understandably stay away.

Data dumps by WikiLeaks have outed rape victims and gay people in Saudi Arabia, private citizens’ emails and personal information in Turkey, and the voice mail messages of Democratic National Committee staff members. Dissent requires the right to privacy: to be let alone in our vulnerabilities and the ability to form our thoughts and share them when we choose. These hacks undermine that crucial right.

Mass data releases, like the Podesta emails, conflate things that the public has a right to know with things we have no business knowing, with a lot of material in the middle about things we may be curious about and may be of some historical interest, but should not be released in this manner.

«

link to this extract

The Mainstreaming of the Mac • Tech.pinions

Jan Dawson pulls together some numbers from Adobe and Apple, to contrast with an estimated installed base for Apple of 90 million Macs:

»

If we put these numbers together, we get a picture of 8-13 million users of Adobe’s creative products and another 13 million or so Apple developers. Of course, of those Adobe users, a good chunk will be using Windows versions rather than Mac versions. At the absolute outside, though, it gives, at most, around 25 million total users in the two buckets that have been most vocal about the MacBook Pro changes, out of a total base of around 90 million, or around 28%. Realistically, that number is probably quite a bit smaller, perhaps around 15-20% of the total. Of these, not all will share the concerns of those who have been so outspoken in the past week. To look at it another way, Apple sold 18.5 million Macs in the past year, which might end up being roughly the same as the combined number of creative professionals and developers in the base.

In the end, the picture that emerges is of a base of Macs with the kinds of users that have been expressing concerns or frustration with the changes in the minority. The vast majority of the user base is in other categories, principally general purpose consumer and business users. How does the rest of the base feel about the new MacBooks? Well, of course, that base is much less vocal and less visible – the general purpose Mac user tends not to blog or host podcasts about Apple.

«

But, he also points out, it needs to update the Mac Pro urgently.
link to this extract

Scriptarian – Scripting Studio for macOS

»

Scriptarian allows you to easily automate macOS using the Swift programming language, providing a modern alternative to AppleScript.

«

I think it’s not so much a “modern alternative” as an alternative; but perhaps a good way to learn Swift.
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Samsung is doing a remake of its fairly successful total recall, this time with washing machines. Photo by nan palmero on Flickr.

I’ll be at Web Summit, the Glastonbury of Tech (except it’s in Lisbon, Portugal) on Tuesday and Wednesday. I hope that won’t interfere with The Overspill. If you’re there and would like to meet, I’m always on Twitter.

You can now sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 12 links for you. Sufficient unto the day. I’m charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Who will win the next big thing? • Naofumi Kagami

»from a historical standpoint, if AI or VR/AR succeeds in disrupting tech, it is actually very unlikely that Google, Microsoft of Facebook would win in the end. These companies are in the exact same positions regarding AI and VR/AR as were Blackberry and Palm prior to iPhone, or as were Yahoo, Lycos and others were prior to Google Search. They have invested heavily into research and also into developing the early market. However, they have not yet discovered the formula that would propel them into the mass market.

No matter how unlikely it may seem today, history is actually quite unequivocal on this. The large and established companies that pioneer an early market, do not reap the rewards when disruption happens and the market goes mainstream. The odds are against Google for winning in AI, and the odds are against Microsoft and Facebook for winning in AR/VR (assuming though that AI and AR/VR do end up being disruptive technologies and not simply sustaining).

Although it is almost impossible to predict what will happen, I will just end this post highlighting a couple scenarios under which the Google might find itself vulnerable for illustrative purposes only.

«

The scenarios are interesting – you’ll probably be able to think of more. The second he suggests is a low-end disruption. But Google was an orthogonal disruption to Microsoft (and Apple); it built on something they enabled, but then challenged them.

The point though that Annexers do less well than Late Natives is relevant.
link to this extract

America is more fragile than you think: a Marine Corps officer on why voters must defeat Donald Trump • Quartz

Jake Cusack:

»Scroll through the constellation of fear mongering sites that orbit conservative media and try to recognize the America you know in those stories. It makes sense that Trump supporters can believe so wholeheartedly that the country is on the verge of collapse.

In the context of this fear, particularly for many who served in the military, measured tones and caution seem like political double-speak and cowardice. They know there is a real enemy. IEDs do not kill in shades of grey. They have seen their friends die to take cities they now see filled with black flags on CNN.

These and other concerns with legitimate roots turn some of my friends and family towards Trump’s aggressive stance and anti-establishment voice, even as they are fully cognizant of his massive personal flaws.

But what they don’t see is how tenuous it all is. I’ve spent my life since Iraq in and out of conflict zones and fragile states. I’ve seen educated, wealthy communities descend overnight into ethnic cleansing. I’ve seen family men turned into butchers. I’ve seen a charismatic reformed warlord, surrounded by capable technical advisors, steer his country irretrievably into the abyss.

I was traveling across Mali, Cote d’Ivoire, and Sierra Leone when Trump escalated his comments suggesting that he’d try to put Hillary Clinton in jail and doubled down on his assertion of “rigged elections.” People there knew exactly what he meant, because they have heard that rhetoric before. This is the language of lands without strong institutions, bereft of the mutual trust that glues our democracy together. It’s the language of civil wars.

«

Here’s my limited take. The US is reaping the whirlwind of a social and taxation system which insists that there’s no benefit in helping everyone; where health care isn’t a public benefit, but a private burden; that being rich makes you better than someone who is poor; having a vote seems to make no difference; and anyone can own a gun. Pull on that thread.
link to this extract

Siri vs. Google Assistant vs. Alexa vs. Cortana: Which AI is best? • Business Insider

Jeff Dunn puts them through a ton of tests in which each does OK-ish, and concludes:

»If the hodgepodge of results above didn’t make it clear, none of these things are at a place I could comfortably call “good.” There is a ton of work to be done.

The problems here are large and sweeping:

• Each assistant still feels like a fragile, thinly veiled web of loosely connected services — because that’s what they are. It’s almost impossible to tell when one of them won’t be able to do the thing you asked.

• You have to be OK giving up your location and loads of personal data to get the most out of them.

• There are numerous instances where using a web browser is simply faster for doing fundamental tasks. There is a reason most people use their Echo for the simplest of functions — it’s not worth slowing down your workflow to do anything else.

• Each one is still wildly finicky when it comes to phrasing. They all think too much in black and white; one misplaced or forgotten word is often enough to discard an entire request.

• It’s incredibly uncomfortable to speak to an inanimate thing in public.

• In Google Assistant’s case, normalizing the need to call on a brand (“OK Google”) whenever you need a hand is Orwellian.

«

link to this extract

Top 10 enduring web-design mistakes • Nielsen Norman Group

Amy Schade, Yunnuo Cheng, and Samyukta Sherugar:

»Since 1996, we have been compiling lists of the top 10 mistakes in web design. This year, we completed a large-scale usability study with 215 participants in the United States and United Kingdom to see what today’s web-design mistakes are. After analyzing results across 43 sites that ranged from small, local businesses to entertainment sites to nonprofits to global organizations, we identified 10 of the most common and most damaging web-design mistakes that hurt our users. (And by hurting their users, these design flaws most definitely also hurt the websites’ business metrics.)

The big news? None of the top issues today is new or surprising. Web design has come a long way. But these persistent problems remain. Modern design patterns and aesthetics change, but underlying user needs remain the same. Users still need to find information, be able to read it, and know what to click and where it leads.

«

It is worth looking at the examples and trying to think of your own (or even trying your own site). It is scary how long some faults can last.
link to this extract

Is Facebook secretly building a phone? • CNet

Sean Hollister:

»Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg… hired Regina Dugan to lead Building 8. Dugan is the former head of both the US Department of Defense’s DARPA research arm, and Google’s Advanced Technologies and Projects (ATAP) research lab.

Zuckerberg suggested, in an April 2016 blog post, that Building 8 would pursue “augmented and virtual reality, artificial intelligence, connectivity and other important areas” — which sounds pretty sciencey, to be sure.

But the division’s job postings and recent hires tell a slightly different story – beginning with the Building 8 mission statement you’ll find at the top of each job post.

Here’s the mission statement in full:

»Building 8 brings together world-class experts to develop and ship groundbreaking products at the intersection of hardware, software, and content. We have a clear mandate to ship products at scale. In particular, seemingly impossible products that define new categories that advance Facebook’s mission of connecting the world. The B8 team will apply DARPA-style breakthrough development at the intersection of ambitious science and product development. It will operate on aggressive, fixed timelines, with extensive use of partnerships in universities, small and large businesses.«

Building 8 is all about shipping hardware, it seems. And could “seemingly impossible products” include an ambitious modular phone like Ara?

«

You misspelt “a stupid modular phone like Ara”. Not clear why Facebook has chosen to duplicate the not-yet-successful Google X – or perhaps it has better focus.
link to this extract

Galaxy Note7 update • Samsung US

Samsung Newsroom:

»As of today, nearly 85% of all recalled Galaxy Note7 devices have been replaced through the U.S. Note7 Refund and Exchange Program, with the majority of the participants opting to receive another Samsung smartphone.

We remain focused on collecting the outstanding Galaxy Note7 phones in the market. To further drive participation, we will be releasing a software update in the coming days that will limit the phone’s ability to charge beyond 60%, as well as issue a reminder pop-up notification every time a consumer charges, reboots or turns on the screen of their Note7 device.

«

I can see a future strand of fiction which starts “I’d been on the run now with my Note7 for fifteen years, and it was beginning to take its toll.”
link to this extract

Why Apple’s adaptive Touch Bar will flop • The Register

Andrew Orlowski:

»Last week Apple replaced physical hardware function keys on its new laptops with a touch sensitive OLED strip, the “Touch Bar”. This isn’t an original idea, and it has failed spectacularly when introduced to the market.

Just two years ago Lenovo tried this with its second generation Yoga. Users hated it, and the change wasn’t repeated for 2015.

“We’d been having the same thoughts,” senior technologist at Lenovo Graham Thomas told us. “People use those function keys for different things or not at all.” The Optimus OLED keyboard made a big splash, introducing adaptive concept in 2006… then didn’t appear for two years. Apple had actually filed for a patent for 2007.

However, the feedback from users was negative. The tech seemed flaky. Lenovo restored the traditional physical Fn keys for the third generation of Yoga (we’ll have a review shortly).

«

Two key differences: first, Lenovo can’t decide what APIs are included in Windows, so its keyboard couldn’t truly extend the experience of Windows; second, Apple has a particularly loyal and eager customer group. Let’s see what the response is when people actually have these new machines in their hands.
link to this extract

The RCS Mirage: “Advanced Messaging” is a mess in the US, and Google’s “standard” is just one more • Android Police

David Ruddock:

»And so we have competing strategies. Google would prefer everyone just support its RCS client, based on the GSMA’s universal profile, and allow users on any carrier to utilize its features, and carriers like AT&T and T-Mobile would rather see the development of a negotiated “universal profile” that allows cross-compatibility of core features, but not necessarily for all features, just the ones the carriers can agree are important enough to need, but not that they’d maybe like to keep to themselves as “value-add” incentives for their subscribers to stay on the network. So, you could (and likely will) end up with a basic, universal RCS profile, but there’s a very real possibility that business interests will gimp that universal profile with a more limited feature set. And let’s not forget: the US’s largest smartphone manufacturer by sales, Apple, has absolutely no reason to adopt RCS ever.

«

As one commenter points out, it’s like the XKCD cartoon about standards:
link to this extract

Computer forensics defuses FBI’s Clinton email ‘bombshell’ – the math doesn’t add up • The Register

Duncan Campbell (who knows one end of a spy agency from another):

»Comey’s letter to Congressional leaders, which started the whole debacle, explained that the agency could not officially look at or report on the emails without obtaining a specific new warrant. The letter implicitly acknowledged that the agency already had copies of all the mails on its computer systems (which would normally automatically have been indexed by forensic software), bringing the Clinton connection to light.

To find out how many emails on the laptop were relevant would have taken “seconds”, according to e-discovery software industry experts. To then find out how many of those – if any – the FBI had not seen in its previous investigation would, at most, have taken “minutes.” Standard methods are to take and match cryptographic hashes of email files (which proves the email files identical, if the hashes match), or to match metadata and then textual content.

The FBI’s previous, year-long investigation into the private Clinton server finished in July, when director James B Comey reported that: “We cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges.”

As only 110 of 30,490 official emails previously examined by the FBI were found to contain classified government information, the number of previously unseen mails that had strayed onto Weiner’s laptop is likely to range from zero to a few tens.

«

link to this extract

Secretive startup Magic Leap loses top marketing executive • Bloomberg

Mark Bergen:

»Magic Leap Inc., a secretive augmented reality startup with a massive funding warchest, lost its top marketing executive before the company has even brought its first product to market.

Brian Wallace, a veteran smartphone executive with previous stints at BlackBerry Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co. and Google, left Magic Leap in October, the company confirmed. The startup made waves when it brought Wallace on in April 2014, after closing a $50 million venture capital round.

Since then, Magic Leap has raised more than $1.3 billion in additional capital from tech giants such as Qualcomm Ventures, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Alphabet Inc.’s Google. The latest investment round, in February, valued the company at $4.5 billion.

“I did what I set out to do, which was help Rony and the team create one of the most hotly anticipated technology companies in years,” Wallace said in an interview, referring to Chief Executive Officer Rony Abovitz. “At this stage though, it’s time for me to move on to other opportunities.”

«

Magic Leap is either going to be the most incredible thing ever, or quite blah compared to all the other stuff already out there. I lean towards the latter.
link to this extract

Samsung recalling almost 2.8m washers due to impact injuries • NBC News

Lucy Bayly:

»Samsung has one more fire to put out: The South Korean company announced on Friday that it was recalling 2.8m top-load washing machines, following reports of “impact injuries” that included a broken jaw.

The problem stems from unbalanced drums, which can separate from the washer and generate enough internal force to cause other parts of the washer to detach — and, in some cases, be launched out of the machine.

Samsung is also the subject of an August lawsuit from owners who said their machines “explode during normal use.”

«

Only seems to be the US – but the machines have been sold in other countries too.
link to this extract

Huawei wants to beat Apple in smartphones in two years: chief exec • Reuters

Harro ten Wolde:

»”When we announced four years ago that we wanted to sell phones, people told us we were crazy. When we said we wanted to sell 100 million phones, they told us we were crazy,” [chief executive of Huawei’s consumer business group Richard] Yu said at a launch event in Munich.

Huawei on Thursday launched a new premium phone, which will sell for €699 apiece. A version developed with Porsche Design will cost €1,395.

The phone has a new artificial intelligence feature: it can learn about its user’s habits and automatically put the most frequently used apps in easy reach.

Huawei was the world’s third-largest smartphone maker in the third quarter with 33.6 million shipped devices, giving it a 9% market share, according to research firm Strategy Analytics.

Apple was still well ahead with 45.5 million devices, or a 12% market share. Samsung was the world leader with 75.3 million shipped devices and a market share of 20.1 percent.

“We are going to take them (Apple) step-by-step, innovation-by-innovation,” Yu said, adding that he expected to improve Huawei’s position along with technology shifts.

“There will be more opportunities. Artificial intelligence, virtual reality, augmented reality,” he said. “It is like driving a car. At every curve or turn, there is an opportunity to overtake the competition.”

«

Is it going to take customers from Apple, though, or from Samsung and other Android OEMs?
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Voice control is going to be the next big thing in the home, it seems. Photo by SBIngram on Flickr.

You can now sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 12 links for you. Use them wisely. I’m charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Improving quality isn’t anti-competitive, part II • Google Public Policy blog

Kent Walker, Google’s general counsel:

»

we disagree with the European Commission’s argument that our improved Google Shopping results are harming competition. As we said last year in our response to the Commission’s original Statement of Objections (SO), we believe these claims are wrong as a matter of fact, law, and economics.

The Commission’s original SO drew such a narrow definition around online shopping services that it even excluded services like Amazon. It claimed that when we offered improved shopping ads to our users and advertisers, we were “favouring” our own services — and that this was bad for a handful of price comparison aggregators who claimed to have lost clicks from Google. But it failed to take into account the competitive significance of companies like Amazon and the broader dynamics of online shopping.

Our response demonstrated that online shopping is robustly competitive, with lots of evidence supporting the common-sense conclusion that Google and many other websites are chasing Amazon, by far the largest player on the field.

«

This is getting really very boring now. Foundem, the British company that was the original complainant to the EC, demolished Google’s response in its rebuttal analysis in June 2015. It’s very clear. Nothing has changed since then except that Google has grabbed more of the online advertising business. (Just to start you off: Google talks about “shopping” but the EC’s Statement of Objections is about “price comparison”. Because misdirection works.)

Could the EC just get on and determine its response now? This really has dragged on long enough.
link to this extract

Asustek, Gigabyte pushing their presence in motherboard market • Digitimes

Monica Chen and Joseph Tsai:

»

Currently, Asustek and Gigabyte together contribute over half of worldwide motherboard shipments and also have a major share in the mid-range to high-end motherboard sector.

In 2016, Gigabyte is expected to ship 16.1-16.5m motherboards, down from 2015’s 17m units. However, the company’s strong shipments in its high-end Z170-based and G1 series motherboards will still increase the company’s overall ASP. The company’s EPS is also expected to grow by more than NT$3.30 (US$0.10) and reach NT$4 in 2016.

Asustek is expected to ship 17-17.5m motherboards in 2016, but the company is also expected to achieve growths in both revenues and profits.

«

So that means worldwide motherboard shipments annually are about 68m, and falling in line with PC shipments. Please could nobody ever tell me that PC shipments are down because “people are making their own”.
link to this extract

Stephen Baker’s top holiday 2016 expectations • NPD

This is for the US:

»

PC holiday revenues revived – Sales will be the best in at least four years, as average sales prices rise

iPad Pros deliver big – Expect revenue increases for Apple tablets, while Android consumer interest wanes

Smartphone sales soar – New iPhones will exceed market expectations and drive the best smartphone market in years

Cutting the (headphone) cord continues – wireless headphones will be on many holiday shopping lists this year

Online sales will not falter – online revenue will account for as much as 33% of consumer electronics holiday sales

«

And quite a few more.
link to this extract

The missing storytelling • Medium

Nati Shochat, in May, on the lack of storytelling in Apple’s presentations these days:

»

explanations are limited and rare these days. The 2015 Macbook’s one USB-C port didn’t get the same explanatory time or effort that Jobs gave the Macbook Air upon its dramatic unveiling in 2008, when he took the time to explain why the new ultra-thin laptop didn’t have a CD/DVD drive. Schiller only referred vaguely to the reason — which is to push the Mac line even further — when asked directly by John Gruber during a one to one session, shortly after the WWDC 2015 event.

In the last year the lack of ‘Why’, stood out even more, as Apple’s new line of accessories took some “strange” design cues. Whether the ability to charge the Apple Pencil via sticking it to the iPad Pro’s lightning port (which is odd but strikingly convenient), or the need to flip over the Magic Mouse 2 — which looks like a dead mouse — in order to charge it, or the new iPhone Smart Battery Case with the hump. None of these products got the explanations behind the design rationale, that avid Apple users got used to in the last decade.

One might ask: if Jobs moulded Apple in his image, why the storytelling hasn’t stuck in the current communications and marketing?

«

This is exactly right. When Tim Cook introduced the new Apple TV, there wasn’t a story around how “TV is going to apps”. Why not? It could have made a huge difference to the presentation of those new MacBooks.
link to this extract

Smart watch market grows 60% in Q3 2016 as Apple ships 2.8m units • Canalys

»

Apple shipped 2.8m Watches in Q3, thanks to the release of the new Series 1 and Series 2 models late in the quarter. Despite reports to the contrary, Canalys research shows that shipments compared favorably to those in Q3 2015, the first full quarter after the original Apple Watch’s launch in April 2015. Total smart watch shipments exceeded 6.1m for the quarter, an annual increase of 60%.

«

By contrast, IDC put the third-quarter figure for Apple at 1.1m, and the total market at 2.7m. That’s quite a difference between the two, though Canalys’s higher total doesn’t do any favours to Android Wear – its figure suggests about 0.8m Android Wear watches for the quarter.

Analyst estimates did put Watch shipments higher than the 1.1m based on Apple’s results, so maybe Canalys is on to something.
link to this extract

Voice control the new breakout star in smart home technology • ABI Research

»

“Voice control will not only draw in new consumers to smart home functionality, but it will help transform a wide variety of new and emerging smart home services and devices into more attractive investments,” says Jonathan Collins, Research Director at ABI Research. “The stage is set for voice control to become the heart of any smart home system.” 

Amazon’s market leadership with its Alexa products and Google’s emerging Home platform strategy reflect not just the popularity of voice control devices within the home but also how voice will become a key smart home interface in the still emerging market for smart home managed systems. Alongside Amazon and Google, Apple, Samsung and Microsoft all have the impetus to bring similar devices and functionality to market.

While voice control will take a greater share of device revenue spending, it is an application that will push into and help drive all smart home markets and device categories. By 2021, more than 600 million smart home devices will ship annually, up from 40 million in 2015.

«

That’s a lot of devices, given that there aren’t anywhere near as many homes as there are people.
link to this extract

What the New York Times missed with its big GMO story • Grist

Nathanael Johnson:

»

if genetic engineering really had turned out to be a silver bullet for agriculture, we would be able to see the change in the zoomed-out big picture. And if GMOs [genetically modified organisms] had proved to be a quantum leap forward, we would see it in Times writer Danny Hakim’s crude country-level comparisons. In that regard, Hakim’s contribution is useful.

The problem here is that there’s enough data that you can easily pick the evidence to support your favorite narrative, depending on where you focus. For instance, in a rebuttal to the story, Monsanto’s chief technology officer picked a narrower focus and found plenty of data for a counternarrative making the case for biotechnology. The most balanced approach is to look at all the available evidence — and that’s what the National Academy of Sciences report already did.

Hakim cites the report where it supports his conclusions, but not in the places it contradicts them. He writes that the report found “‘there was little evidence’ that the introduction of genetically modified crops in the United States had led to yield gains beyond those seen in conventional crops.” But Hakim doesn’t mention that the report also noted that genetic engineering increased yields “where weed control is improved” and “when insect-pest pressure was high.” He doesn’t mention the report found that insect-resistant GMOs reduced insecticide use “in all cases examined”…

…Because most of us aren’t farmers, we have a hard time seeing the GMO age at all. But U.S. farmers can see it. Farmers aren’t backward dupes who are easily tricked into buying unnecessary technologies. These days, farmers are skeptical and tech-savvy. Many have multiple degrees. They often test yields and pest-resistance by planting half a field with one kind of seed, and half with another. They clearly think they’re getting something valuable when they pay the extra money for GMOs. Both farmers interviewed in the Times piece — one in France and one in South Carolina — said they thought GMOs were helpful.

«

It’s that last paragraph that’s most important. What do the people who have to put their money on the line think? The ones with the direct experience?
link to this extract

The irrational downfall of South Korea’s president Park Geun-hye • Ask a Korean!

“T.K” on the bizarre scandal engulfing South Korea’s president:

»

Even in her apology, president Park Geun-hye showed that she still might be under Choi Soon-sil’s hold. What would a self-interested politician would do, if the corruption of one of his cronies was revealed? The politician would sell the crony down the river, denying up and down that he ever knew or interacted with the crony. Such denial would be cowardly and dishonest, but at least it is predictable. But not with Park Geun-hye. She stood in front of the whole country and admitted that Choi Soon-sil fixed her speeches. Instead of cutting ties with her, Park reaffirmed that Choi was an old friend who helped her during difficult times.

This is utterly irrational. Rational people can expect that a corrupt politician may steal money for himself. They can even expect that he may steal for his family. But no one can expect that a corrupt politician would steal money for a daughter of a fucking psychic who claimed to speak with her dead mother. No one, not even the most cynical Korean, expected that the president would refuse to cut ties with Choi Soon-sil, a woman with no discernible talent other than manipulating the president and humiliating her in the process. Koreans may expect that the president would be corrupt, but they never could have expected that the president might be feeble in her mind.

Sports columnist Bill Simmons coined the term “Tyson Zone,” in which nothing you hear about a particular celebrity can possibly surprise you. Did you hear that Mike Tyson urinated on a police officer? Of course he did! Did you hear that Mike Tyson is attempting to breed unicorns? Of course he is! Given what you already know about Mike Tyson, none you hear about Mike Tyson could possibly surprise you.

With Choi Soon-sil-gate, Park Geun-hye put the entire country into the Tyson Zone.

«

I found it difficult to follow the dramatis personae in this, but it reads like something from Grimm’s Fairy Tales. Also: if the US votes in Trump, it’s going to follow South Korea into the Tyson Zone damn fast.
link to this extract

The passenger train created to carry the dead • BBC

Amanda Ruggeri:

»

For 87 years, nearly every day, a single train ran out of London and back. It left from a dedicated station near Waterloo built specifically for the line and its passengers. The 23-mile journey, which had no stops after leaving London, took 40 minutes. Along the way to their destination, riders glimpsed the lovely landscapes of Westminster, Richmond Park and Hampton Court — no mistake, as the route was chosen partly for its “comforting scenery”, as one of the railway’s masterminds noted.

How much comfort a route gives passengers isn’t a usual consideration for a train line. But this was no normal train line.

Many of the passengers on the train would be distraught. The others — those passengers’ loved ones — be dead. Their destination: the cemetery.

A rare view of the first London Necropolis Railway station, built in 1854; it was demolished after the new station was built in 1902 (Credit: SSPL)

In operation from 1854 to 1941, the London Necropolis Railway was the spookiest, strangest train line in British history. It transported London’s dead south-west to Brookwood Cemetery, near Woking, in Surrey, a cemetery that was built in tandem with the railway. At its peak, from 1894 to 1903, the train carried more than 2,000 bodies a year.

It also transported their families and friends. Guests could leave with their dearly departed at 11:40am, attend the burial, have a funeral party at one of the cemetery’s two train stations (complete with home-cooked ham sandwiches and fairy cakes), and then take the same train back, returning to London by 3:30pm.

«

link to this extract

Handsets equipped with USB Type-C connectors will take off worldwide in 2017 • Strategy Analytics

»

USB connectivity has been a part of mobile phones since the 1990s. Today, nearly all handsets sold globally contain an open or proprietary USB port.  Over that time-period, USB has evolved from Type-A connectors to Type-B and now Type-C.  The first Type-C portable device to emerge was the Nokia N1 tablet introduced in Q4 2014. Apple introduced Type-C ports in Q1 2015 when it unveiled its latest MacBook portable computer.  The first mobile handsets to incorporate the technology were smartphones introduced first by LeTV, followed by  OnePlus 2 and Zuk Z1, in 2015 almost two dozen handsets with Type-C was introduced.

Strategy Analytics forecasts global USB-C handset sales to grow a huge +1600% between 2016 and 2022. Emerging first in China, from LeTV, OnePlus and others in 2015, handsets equipped with USB Type-C connectors will take off worldwide next year, as costs fall.

Beyond Asia, North America and Western Europe will see rapid adoption of the technology. We predict Type-C will become the dominant connector-port on cellphones.

USB-C will first appear in high-end models, but it will soon begin to migrate to lower-tier devices. In the first phase Type-C is used as a differentiator but soon it will become a standard for all devices.

«

link to this extract

MacBook Pro review: the Air apparent • The Verge

Vlad Savov:

»

To Apple’s credit, there’s no single Windows laptop that yet matches all of the MacBook line’s key strengths — touchpad ergonomics, battery life, display, and industrial design — but Apple’s changes have now created an opportunity that didn’t exist before. All a Windows vendor needs to do to convince me is to build something as good as a MacBook and then top it off with a simple SD card slot. macOS isn’t as major an advantage as it used to be, especially for someone like me whose professional life revolves around Google and Adobe’s cloud services.

When it launched the MacBook in 2015, Apple wasn’t shy about claiming it had reinvented the laptop. With the benefit of some hindsight, I’d argue Apple only reinvented its own product line. Copycat designs have arisen, as they always do, but the MacBook’s biggest impact so far has been within Apple’s walled-in ecosystem. We can see more of the new MacBook’s DNA in the new MacBook Pro than original MacBook Pro features. This is just the way Apple laptops are made now and we can either learn to like it or go elsewhere.

And that, frankly, is the problem here. Apple is trying to return to its old habit of dragging us forward into the future like a wild-eyed inventor, but this time it might have cut a little too deep into present-day functionality while trying to promote tomorrow’s technology. Apple could have been a major trailblazer for USB-C even while retaining a classic USB port and a photographer-friendly SD card slot. I don’t think those things would have disrupted the MacBook Pro’s scrupulously perfected proportions or Apple’s bottom line too much.

I don’t know if I’ll be buying this MacBook Pro, in spite of its superb design and performance, and that’s surprising to me.

«

Essentially, the PC (desktop/laptop) ecosystem stopped evolving; USB-C is externally imposed, aiming to do everything for everyone at Intel’s urging so it would create new demand for PC CPUs.

However the ideal person, or people, to get to review the new MacBook Pro would be those who actually use it to the limit – video editors, DJs, photographers. Not those whose trade is writing. I wonder if we’ll ever get to the stage where reviews of pro equipment are done that way.
link to this extract

Revised estimates of Leave vote share in Westminster constituencies • Medium

Chris Hanretty is reader in politics at the University of East Anglia:

»

I’ve been working on improved estimates which do have this property, and which also include results from Scotland. The details of the analysis can be found in a research note; the estimates themselves can be found in this Google Docs spreadsheet.

The difference between the two estimates are slight. 32 constituencies were formerly estimated to have voted Leave, but are now estimated to have voted Remain; 11 went the other way. This means a net change of +21 for Remain in England and Wales. Including Scotland, this means that 401 of 632 constituencies (63%) are now judged to have voted for Leave.

«

This is why even if Parliament votes on triggering Article 50 (to initiative the UK’s exit from the EU), it won’t change the outcome. Any MP who votes against the will of their constituency is committing political suicide. You can also see a rough map from July; the story’s the same, though the numbers slightly different.
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Newspapers: all washed up? Photo by Nathan Winter Design on Flickr.

You can now sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 9 links for you. Apply externally. I’m charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Facebook is right to sink Admiral’s app • Open Rights Group

»

Late yesterday, on the eve before Admiral tried to launch Firstcarquote, their application’s permission to use Facebook data was revoked by the social media site.

According to Admiral’s press release their app would use, “social data personality assessments, matched to real claims data, to better understand first time drivers and more accurately predict risk.” So young people could offer up their Facebook posts in the hope of getting a reduction in their car insurance.

However, their application has been found to be in breach of Facebook’s Platform Policy section 3.15, which states:

»

Don’t use data obtained from Facebook to make decisions about eligibility, including whether to approve or reject an application or how much interest to charge on a loan.

«

«

Bah – Admiral should just target people who have old or crashed cars via Facebook. But it’s a rare instance in which Facebook can look like the positively good player.
link to this extract

April 2015: Have publishers lost their minds with Outbrain? • Mediapost

Ari Rosenberg:

»

Last November, Time Inc. announced a $100 million keg-party deal with Outbrain.  So now its sites will have more traffic, and hence more inventory, while lowering the quality of its audience through the lens of common sense. 

For example:

Food & Wine magazine (part of Time Inc.) has a rate base of 925,000.  Advertisers see that number and it makes sense.  Foodandwine.com reports 8.5 million monthly unique visitors.  That number makes far less sense for this affluent brand.  How can its prestigious audience demographics not get watered down at this unnatural size? 

Here are more examples of premium sites listed as Outbrain customers, who appear to have outgrown their brand’s natural size:

New York magazine has a rate base of 400,000. It reports 14.5 million monthly uniques.  Only 8.4 million people live in New York City.

INC. magazine reaches a clearly defined audience of “owners of growing businesses.”  The magazine’s rate base is 700,000.  The Web site reports 7 million monthly uniques, which makes the site audience less clearly defined…

…The idea that buying a click to your site for 10 cents through Outbrain is going to then convert into a more dedicated site visitor is just an excuse. The real reason sites do this: to have more impressions for their lower quality advertisers buying the site via RTB, and to help fulfill orders sold to advertisers who bought that site directly. Neither outcome helps premium publishers increase the value of what they sell.

Outbrain is just another short-term fix that creates a long-term problem.

«

The point about New York magazine is quite neat; though of course there could be that many people interested in New York.
link to this extract

Google security engineer claims Android is now as secure as the iPhone • Motherboard

Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai:

»

As an example of Android’s misunderstood security, [Android director of Adrian] Ludwig used the infamous series of critical bugs known as Stagefright, which were found last year. Ludwig noted that despite the alarm and the potential danger to practically all Android users, they have yet to see a real-life hack on an Android phone done exploiting Stagefright.

“At this point we still don’t have any confirmed instances of exploitation in the wild,” he said.

Obviously, Ludwig admitted that while things have gotten much better in the last year, telephone carriers and phone manufacturers that use Android still have to improve their update cycles and become quicker in adopting security patches.

“We got quite a bit of work left to do to get to a point where that actually happens on a regular basis across the whole the ecosystem,” Ludwig said.

«

link to this extract

Wherefore art thou Macintosh? • Asymco

Horace Dediu:

»

Indeed, because no usurper was allowed to emerge, PC/Windows never moved to a mobile evolution of computing. Microsoft’s platform future was lost because the antibodies which eat disruptions were left unchecked.

But Apple’s immune system was suppressed. It allowed a disruptor to emerge from within. Apple gave birth to its future by suppressing the reaction to that new seemingly parasitic organism. It took an immense willpower to allow this to happen.

But it takes us back to the question of what to do with the incumbent, the donor of DNA and resources. The parent that sacrificed for the child.

The Mac is thus not treated disparagingly. It deserves and gets respect. It is preserved but with limited responsibilities.

Which brings me to the question of what it is allowed to be and hence what it is. It cannot take on the role of being the future. That belongs to the touch screen devices. It will not morph into a touch device any more than a teen’s parent will become cool by putting on skinny jeans. What it will do is become better at what it is hired to do.

The key to the Mac therefore becomes that which the iPad/iPhone isn’t: an indirect input device. The keyboard and mouse/trackpad are what define the Mac. The operating system, the apps, the UX, are all oriented around the indirect input method. The iPhone’s capacitive touch brought about the direct input method, a third pivot in input methods (first was mouse, second trackpad/scroll wheel). Each pivot launched a new set of platforms and the Mac is the legacy of the second.

«

link to this extract

Print newspapers are dying faster than you think • Vox

Timothy B. Lee:

»

Advertising is a cyclical business. Revenue tends to go up during economic booms and then decline during recessions. So when newspapers ad revenues plunged in 2008 and 2009, many in the industry hoped this would prove a temporary setback and that they’d regain some of the lost ground once the economy recovered.

Instead, over the past six years the opposite has happened: Newspaper advertising revenues have continued to deteriorate even as the economy booms. The latest numbers from a number of major newspapers tell a grim story.

On Wednesday, the Wall Street Journal announced that it was consolidating some sections of the newspaper to cope with dwindling ad sales. The transition to a slimmer paper will be aided by a round of buyouts [voluntary and compulsory redundancies] the Journal announced last month.

And the situation is even grimmer at smaller papers. For example, the Ithaca Journal in upstate New York announced today that it was laying off two editorial staffers, leaving a paper that once employed an editorial staff of more than 20 people with just two full-time reporters.

«

Read on to discover who to glare at over this.
link to this extract

Facebook beat Q3 earnings estimates, has more than a billion daily users • Recode

Kurt Wagner:

»

The social giant beat earnings estimates Wednesday, bringing in more than $5.7bn in mobile advertising revenue alone. That’s bigger than Facebook’s entire business in Q3 of 2015. It also surpassed one billion “mobile only” monthly active users for the first time last quarter, which means those billion-plus users never visited Facebook on any device other than a phone.

Why does that matter? Well, it underscores what we’ve known for quite a while now, that advertisers are spending more and more on mobile advertising, and Facebook is in a unique position to collect a lot of those ad dollars. In fact, it’s one of just two businesses driving the whole industry. (Hey, Google!)

«

That’s money that isn’t available to any other media outlet to win as advertising. Data from the IAB suggests that when you remove Facebook and Google, digital advertising in the US actually shrank in the first half of this year. This doesn’t seem healthy.
link to this extract

Feds strike down another multi-national “tech support” scam • Ars Technica

Joe Mullin:

»

Federal authorities say a group of scammers that “bilked millions” from US consumers with pop-up ads and hijacked Web browsers has been sued by the Federal Trade Commission.

The scheme, which operates under the name Global Access Tech Support, used pop-up ads that told consumers their computers were “hacked, infected, or otherwise compromised,” according to the FTC complaint (PDF) published yesterday. Consumers are then instructed to call a toll-free number in the message. The pop-ups “are typically designed so that consumers are unable to close or navigate around them, rendering consumers’ web browser unusable.”

Anyone who calls the toll-free number is connected to telemarketers in India, who then roll out a sales pitch explaining that the caller’s computer is “in urgent need of repair.” The telemarketers claim they’re affiliated with either Microsoft or Apple or are “certified” by those companies.
If they’re still along for the ride at this point, users are directed to a website that prompts them to begin a remote access session. The telemarketers gain access to the computer and “run a series of purported diagnostic tests, which, in reality, are nothing more than a high-pressured sales pitch designed to scare consumers into believing that their computers are corrupted, hacked, otherwise compromised, or generally performing badly.”

«

I wrote about these gangs at the Guardian back in 2012; nothing has changed, essentially. They’re making millions per year from this scam, and have no reason to stop – VOIP calls from India are cheap, and people are so used to Indian accents on support lines that they’re easily fooled.
link to this extract

How Spotify can tear up the music business • Bloomberg

Leila Abboud:

»

I’ve looked before at how Spotify could lure more paying customers by offering distinct high and low-end services at different prices. There’s something else it might do to improve profits and shore up its power: mimic Netflix by becoming a producer as well as a distributor — and take other steps to bring more music on board that doesn’t cost so much.That means acting more like a label. Traditional music labels do two big things: discover and nurture artists, and market them. With a trove of user data, a strong brand and global reach, Spotify could do that too. Imagine if it branched out into developing independent-minded artists such as British grime star Skepta. Or if it allowed unsigned acts to upload music to its service in a similar way to SoundCloud or YouTube. Spotify could even try buying independent music labels such as Beggars Group (home of SubPop and Matador Records) or Warp (London’s electronic dance music specialist.)It could then use its control over curated playlists and recommendations to push its own stuff. Over time, this might even give it more clout when negotiating with labels.

«

Sure to be antitrust issues if it were to get too big. And while streaming music might not be profitable, setting up artist labels isn’t a path to riches any more either.
link to this extract

Fitbit shares are crashing after missing on sales and cutting its full-year earnings forecast • Business Insider

Akin Oyedele:

»

The maker of fitness trackers said it now sees fourth-quarter adjusted earnings per share (EPS) in a range of $0.14-$0.18, far below analysts’ forecast for $0.75 according to Bloomberg. It lowered its full-year revenue guidance to a range of $2.32bn and $2.4bn, but analysts had expected $2.6bn. 

This weak guidance came ahead of the holiday quarter, which is critical for consumer-electronics makers and retailers, since their products are popular gift items.

The market for wearable fitness trackers is intensely competitive, with Fitbit stacked up against the likes of Garmin and Apple. 

In the third quarter, Fitbit’s unit sales grew 11%, and its average selling price rose by the same amount. New products like the Charge 2 and Flex 2 attracted new customers.

«

Sold more than 50m, but tough times lie ahead.
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

US elections are built around a picture of 1950s American which no longer exists. Photo by Seattle Municipal Archives on Flickr.

You can now sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 13 links for you. Use them wisely. I’m charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Microsoft says Russia-linked hackers exploiting Windows flaw • Reuters

Jim Finkle and Dustin Volz:

»

Microsoft said on Tuesday that a hacking group previously linked to the Russian government and U.S. political hacks was behind recent cyber attacks that exploited a newly discovered Windows security flaw.

The software maker said in an advisory on its website there had been a small number of attacks using “spear phishing” emails from a hacking group known Strontium, which is more widely known as “Fancy Bear,” or APT 28. Microsoft did not identify any victims.

Microsoft’s disclosure of the new attacks and the link to Russia came after Washington accused Moscow of launching an unprecedented hacking campaign aimed at disrupting and discrediting the upcoming U.S. election.

«

link to this extract

Can DDoS attacks trigger ads and make money for the target? • botlab.io

Botlab.io calls itself “a think tank for digital crime fighting”:

»

Can DDoS attacks trigger ads? 

TL;DR

Yes. All application / layer-7 DDoS attacks trigger ads on the target site by default. The”visits” resulting from some layer-7 DDoS attack are no different from visits from advanced web scrapers visiting a page. This means layer-7 attacks may end up making money for the target and give the incentive to the target to not disclose such attacks. For ad fraud perps, it gives plausible deniability for otherwise highly suspicious patterns  in their traffic profile…

…Questionable sites often use shady ad networks to monetize their traffic, and many such ad networks will welcome any spike in traffic with open arms. Regular ad network commission is 50% or more of the revenue generated by the ad impressions on a site in their network. Therefore they do not always have the right incentives to disqualify suspicious traffic as non-legitimate. Even major networks such as Google have serious issues in proactively dealing with traffic quality. Recent research covering Google’s ad network traffic quality shows evidence for this claim.

«

Huh. Interesting idea. Hard to prove, though. Which is what makes it interesting.
link to this extract

‘Normal America’ is not a small town of white people • FiveThirtyEight

Jed Kolko:

»

I calculated how demographically similar each U.S. metropolitan area is to the U.S. overall, based on age, educational attainment, and race and ethnicity. The index equals 100 if a metro’s demographic mix were identical to that of the U.S. overall.

By this measure, the metropolitan area that looks most like the U.S. is New Haven, Connecticut, followed by Tampa, Florida, and Hartford, Connecticut. All of the 10 large metros that are demographically most similar to the U.S. overall are in the Northeast, Midwest or center of the country, with the exception of Tampa. Two of them — New Haven and Philadelphia — are even on Amtrak’s Acela (that’s “uh-SELL-ah”) line. None is in the West, though Sacramento, California, comes close at No. 12.

«

Also entertaining, in the same piece, is “places that are most like 1950s America” and this comment:

»

These misconceptions affect our politics: an outdated view of “normal America” is baked into the presidential election process. Iowa and New Hampshire, which vote first in the primary season and therefore have disproportionate influence, rank 37th and 41st, respectively, in their similarity to the U.S. overall.

«

Might make sense to start changing that. Power of data and all that.
link to this extract

The final Wii U will roll off Nintendo’s production line this week • Eurogamer.net

Tom Phillips:

»

Nintendo will end Wii U production this Friday, multiple sources have confirmed to Eurogamer.

At the last official count, as of 30th September, Nintendo had shipped 13.36m Wii U consoles. The Wii U’s final tally will likely now be only slightly more.

For comparisons sake, GameCube sold 21m. N64 sold 32m. Wii sold 101m.

Nintendo’s Japanese production line will shut down for the last time this week after the final deadline for orders passed yesterday, Eurogamer understands. Only a small number of further orders were placed.

Wii U launched back in November 2012 and quickly shifted a couple of million units, although sales have been steady to slow ever since.

«

The original Wii was wonderful because you stood up to use it. It was an action console. The games – Wii Sports and the rest – reflected that. It was energising. The Wii U turned that into a seated console, with that stupid tablet which was too heavy to hold standing up. It completely missed what made the Wii wonderful, even if it did conform to the idea of a “games console” – ironically, just as the time that games in volume were becoming more mobile than ever before.
link to this extract

Second Life creators head to virtual reality • WSJ

Joanna Stern:

»

Onstage at The Wall Street Journal’s WSJDLive 2016 global technology conference, Second Life creator Linden Lab demonstrated its forthcoming social virtual reality platform Sansar. It lets you create a 3-D virtual avatar and environment and then invite others to join you.

“Once you can create any space, you can create any social interaction you want,” says Linden Lab CEO Ebbe Altberg. “Whether it is an office, classroom, family room, bar.”

«

As long as that social interaction is with spooky robots, as evidenced by the picture of the avatars of Joanna Stern and Geoffrey Fowler:

link to this extract

Debunking Trump’s “secret server” • Errata Security

Rob Graham on the story, via DNS data, that a “Trump server” is “communicating” with “a server in Russia”:

»

The evidence available on the Internet is that Trump neither (directly) controls the domain “trump-email.com”, nor has access to the server. Instead, the domain was setup and controlled by Cendyn, a company that does marketing/promotions for hotels, including many of Trump’s hotels. Cendyn outsources the email portions of its campaigns to a company called Listrak, which actually owns/operates the physical server in a data center in Philidelphia.

In other words,  Trump’s response is (minus the political bits) likely true, supported by the evidence. It’s the conclusion I came to even before seeing the response.

When you view this “secret” server in context, surrounded by the other email servers operated by Listrak on behalf of Cendyn, it becomes more obvious what’s going on. In the same Internet address range of Trump’s servers you see a bunch of similar servers, many named [client]-email.com. In other words, trump-email.com is not intended as a normal email server you and I are familiar with, but as a server used for marketing/promotional campaigns.

«

Slate’s original story always felt like a stretch.
link to this extract

Twitter tests new ad-blocking Reader mode on mobile • The Guardian

Alex Hern:

»

Twitter is testing a new feature on its iOS app which turns on Apple’s “Reader” mode by default on every link opened in its in-app browser.

First introduced in 2010, and ported to iOS in 2011, Reader mode is a oft-forgotten feature in Safari that strips out most of the formatting from a webpage, removing adverts, navigation links, comments, and almost everything else except for the main content of a text-based article.

In the new test from Twitter, rolled out for a small number of users – including one Guardian reporter – the company has enabled Reader mode by default on every single link clicked.

While the new feature can be a boon for those navigating badly designed web-pages, it also manages to mangle the presentation of almost as many sites. While the feature works well for traditional news articles, anything that isn’t a chunk of text-heavy content in the middle of a page falls apart.

The change will also be worrying for many media organisations: unlike similar light-weight webpage options, such as Facebook Instant Articles and Google’s Amp project, there’s no option to customise the appearance of the Reader version of the page, nor any ability to monetise the views.

«

Yeah, it’s the latter worrying them. Though there’s no obvious reason why Twitter should be doing this. It seems to be having a bonfire of the vanities at the moment.
link to this extract

Is that a PC on your desk? Windows hybrids, Macs and iPads struggle for share • ZDNet

Ed Bott:

»

Does anyone even know what a PC is anymore?

That’s not an idle question. Unfortunately, it’s a reflection of the confusion among analysts covering this space today.

I’ve just reviewed four years’ worth of data from IDC and Gartner, the two big research companies that release regular reports tracking the state of the PC market. IDC publishes its results in its Worldwide Quarterly PC Tracker, while Gartner’s data is part of its PC Quarterly Statistics Worldwide report. Full reports are a subscribers-only product, but both firms publish detailed press releases with each new publication.

So, if you study both sets of data you’ll get a good handle on the PC market, right?

Spoiler: They can’t even agree on the definition of a PC.

…IDC says a Chromebook is a PC but a Surface Book running Windows 10 isn’t. Gartner counts the entire Surface line but leaves Chromebooks off the list.

To make things even more confusing, Apple (alone among device makers) publishes detailed sales figures for both its iPad and Mac lines. And Tim Cook insists that “the iPad Pro is a replacement for a notebook or a desktop for many, many people.”

«

Yup, it’s a problem all right; made worse by the purposeful obfuscation by those research companies in their public releases. The companies of course want people to pay for the full data, but there’s plenty of confusion sown because writers get hold of half the story and can’t figure out the other half.
link to this extract

Low-cost detachables and slates in the lead as tablet market slump persists • IDC

»

The worldwide tablet market continued its slump as vendors shipped 43m units in the third quarter of 2016 (3Q16), a year-over-year decline of 14.7%, according to preliminary data from the International Data Corporation (IDC) Worldwide Quarterly Tablet Tracker. In contrast to the annual decline, 3Q16 shipments were up 9.8% over the second quarter of 2016 as the larger vendors prepared for the holiday quarter.

Low-cost (sub-$200) detachables also reached an all-time high as vendors like RCA flooded the market. “Unfortunately, many low-cost detachables also deliver a low-cost experience,” said Jitesh Ubrani, senior research analyst with IDC’s Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Device Trackers. “The race to the bottom is something we have already experienced with slates and it may prove detrimental to the market in the long run as detachables could easily be seen as disposable devices rather than potential PC replacements.”

“Beyond the different end-user experience delivered by low- and high-end tablets, we’re witnessing real tectonic movements in the market with slate companion devices sold at the low-end serving a broader platform strategy, like Amazon is doing with Alexa on its Fire Tablets, and more expensive productivity tools closer to true computing and legitimate notebook replacement devices that should manage to keep average prices up,” said Jean Philippe Bouchard, research director, Tablets at IDC.

Despite Apple’s marketing push for the iPad Pro, the iPad Air and Mini lines have been the models with mass appeal, accounting for more than two-thirds of its shipments this quarter. Although Apple’s tablet shipments declined 6.2% year over year, total iPad-related revenues were flat for the quarter, thanks to the iPad Pro offering.

Samsung continued to hold the number 2 position. Fortunately, the negative press from the Note 7 did not bleed over into its tablet business. However, overreliance on the declining slate market led to a decline of 19.3% compared to 3Q15. Samsung’s attempt to enter the detachable market with its TabPro S at the beginning of 2016 seems to have taken a backseat as its price and positioning remain uncompetitive.

«

IDC’s comment implies about 3m iPad Pros (both flavours) shipped/sold, but it sounds like Samsung is hanging on by its fingertips. And – the irony – Microsoft’s Surface still doesn’t figure in IDC’s top five, meaning it shipped fewer than 2.4m (possibly more like 1m), even though it arguably chiselled out the niche for the Pro – but also, I’d suggest, did it too early. It’s not just technology; timing matters too.
link to this extract

Interview Transcription • transcrbr

»

transcrbr provides a technological solution to transcribing interviews, while retaining the quality of transcriptions created by humans.

«

Set up by a team including an MSc in AI from Edinburgh, and a former staffer at Google and Microsoft. It’s aiming to create a speech-to-text product using AI to intelligently transcribe interviews. Sign up if you’re interested. I’ve always wondered how soon we’d have this – the improvements in speech-to-text seem to beckon towards it, yet nobody offered it.
link to this extract

Uber is quietly terrible for women and black people: study • Jalopnik

Damon Lavrinc:

»

The National Bureau of Economic Research, a respected non-profit and non-partisan research organization, has released the findings of a two-year study that tracked discrimination of riders using Uber, Lyft, and Flywheel in Seattle and Boston. The study was done by researchers at MIT, Stanford and the University of Washington.

The study involved nearly 1,500 rides across the two cities, with work beginning in Seattle late last year to this March. Undergrads from the University of Washington were given identical phones with the three ride-sharing apps pre-loaded, instructed to take a handful of prescribed routes, and then noting when the ride was requested, when it was accepted by the driver, when they were picked up, and finally when they got to their destination.

In the Seattle experiment, trip requests from black riders took between 16 to 28% longer to be accepted by both UberX and Lyft, and breaking UberX out showed a wait time of 29 to 35% longer than their white counterparts.

Those figures are based on UberX usage, primarily because of the different ways a new ride is displayed to the driver through the Uber or Lyft app.

For Uber, drivers don’t see the name of the person they’re picking up until they accept the fare, at which point they can cancel. But for Lyft, which displays the rider’s name and picture (if they included it) before they accept the fare, means trying to quantize discriminatory practices through Lyft is largely impossible—a model Uber could conceivably adopt.

«

Two years is a long time for a study. But this really is something Uber should respond to.
link to this extract

How Apple could have avoided much of the controversy • Chuqui

Chuq von Rospach used to work at Apple; his take on last week’s product introduction (and non-introduction, on the desktop side) is worth your time:

»

Speaking of clusters, let’s talk Mac Pro for a minute. I’ve come to the belief that the trash can Mac pro, the “Can’t Innovate my Ass” machine, is a product mistake of the “20th Century Anniversary Macintosh” caliber. It was a technological marvel, it was a stunning design, and it was a terrible piece of hardware for it’s primary audiences because of limited upgradability and component flexibility — and then Apple compounded that by not having good upgrade plans in place to refresh it since the design it created wouldn’t let its users do it for themselves.

«

And this, which to me is a killer point about ports:

»

to those arguing that Apple is just soaking users by forcing them to buy dongles, adding $40 to a $2500 product simply isn’t financially significant. And if you think about it, if Apple did see these are lucrative products instead of functional accessories, they’d make them a lot prettier.

But the bigger issue around dongles is that niche thing again. These are accessories that allow specific customizations to the device that some people will want, but which most people won’t need. If you think about it, perhaps the biggest change from my older, 2013 laptop is that it’s gone from having seven (yes, that many) ports, each with a specific purpose to having four points, each customizable by a cable to dongle to solve the problem you have.

My laptop has a power port, an SD card port, 3 Thunderbolt ports and two USB ports. I know that in the four years I’ve owned it, I’ve never used the SD card, I use the Power port, one Thunderbolt port, and occasionally plug a USB cable in. So half the ports in this thing are never used — and yet I paid for them because they were built into the computer.

That’s the issue that defines dongles: Should 100% of buyers pay for a feature when only 5% of the owners will use it? Or 10%? How many users will need a feature before you think it ought to be required for everyone to buy it as part of the device? Where do you draw that line?

«

I’ve never used the SD card slot or – I’m pretty sure – the HDMI output port on my 2012 Macbook Pro. Not really going to fight over that. The whole piece is well worth reading at leisure.
link to this extract

Benjamin Button reviews the new MacBook Pro • Pinboard blog

Maciej Ceglowski, channelling F. Scott Fitzgerald’s famous character:

»

The new MacBook Pro shows that Apple is finally becoming serious about developers.

Gone is the gimmicky TouchBar, gone are the four USB-C ports that forced power users to carry a suitcase full of dongles. In their place we get a cornucopia of developer-friendly ports: two USB 3.0 and Thunderbolt 2 ports, a redesigned power connector, and a long-awaited HDMI port.

Photographers will rejoice at the surprising and welcome addition of an SDXC card reader, a sign that Apple might be thinking seriously about photography.

The new MagSafe connector is a bit of Apple design genius. The charging cord stays seated securely, but pops right off if you yank on it. No more worries about destroying your $2k laptop just by accidentally kicking a cord.

What hasn’t changed: Apple has kept the beautiful Retina display, and storage and memory are the same as before. The new machines will be slightly thicker (to accomodate the USB ports) and 200 grams heavier, but it’s not clear how this will affect battery life.

Interestingly, Apple has removed the fingerprint reader and its associated dedicated chip, perhaps assuming that developers would not comfortable with a machine they don’t fully control.

«

That Button. Some day soon they’re going to start banning him from bars on age grounds.
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Black Mirror: who’d go with the idea of a Prime Minister doing something with a pig, for god’s sake? Photo by Steve Garfield on Flickr.

You can now sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 13 links for you. Use them wisely. I’m charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Bug request: Remove web content access to Battery API • Mozilla Firefox Bugzilla

»

Bug 1313580 – Remove web content access to Battery API
Status:RESOLVED FIXED

«

Aha. This was pointed out as a possible security risk (remember reading it here?). Good to know some people are taking action. (In the meantime, rely on your phone’s OS to know what to do about your battery level.)
link to this extract

Patronising or portentous? Tech journalists weigh in on ‘Black Mirror’ • The i newspaper

I wrote an opinion piece at The i on the new series, debating with Rhiannon Williams. She hates it; I think it’s important:

»

Like Brooker, I’ve always been fascinated with the way that technology doesn’t do quite what we want it to, even when it works exactly as it was designed to. Social impact is what really matters, not how much RAM a phone has or how many pixels its screen has. Too much technology discussion focuses on the grain of the trees and ignores the forest growing around us.

Look at how Uber “freeing” people to drive us around has turned into a full-blown dispute about labour markets. If you find your emergency locksmiths through Google Maps, what happens to their price and trustworthiness? Hint: nothing good. If you let your newly minted artificial intelligence system label photos, will it be racist? Those are just the starting points. We’ll feel their effects down the years. Can we forestall them if we pause to reflect?

«

link to this extract

Jony Ive rejected touchscreen Mac, but working on things beyond the Touch Bar • 9to5Mac

Ben Lovejoy pulls out a couple of salient quotes from the Jony Ive interview with CNet (linked here a couple of days ago):

»

Ive explained that Apple had opted for the Touch Bar after exploring a number of possible approaches, taking several of them to prototype stage before real-life use determined which concept offered the greatest value.

»

There’s a number of designs that we explored that conceptually make sense. But then when we lived on them for a while, sort of pragmatically and day to day, [they] are sometimes less compelling. This is something [we] lived on for quite a while before we did any of the prototypes. You really notice or become aware [of] something’s value when you switch back to a more traditional keyboard.

«

This did, he said, take a lot of work, as it was important to create a prototype close enough to the final product to provide realistic feedback from users.

»

One of the things that remains quite a big challenge for us is that you have to prototype to a sufficiently sophisticated level to really figure out whether you’re considering the idea, or whether what you’re really doing is evaluating how effective a prototype is.

«

«

Of course Ive investigated a touch screen. I can’t imagine anyone rational who, on consideration, wouldn’t think they had. But (to reiterate a point made in the past) Apple already sells more touchscreen non-phones than it does Macs. Why up the price for something that people can already choose, and which they don’t choose in large numbers in the Windows market?

But then, the problem is: what of the things you can do are useful? TouchID is an obvious one – but if you’re going to add that, what else can you add that’s also useful and uses the same base software? It is problems like this that designers really face. That’s not the same as the problems that pundits perceive.
link to this extract

Publishers are rethinking those ‘Around the Web’ ads • The New York Times

Sapna Maheshwari and John Herrman:

»

The companies Taboola and Outbrain, both founded about a decade ago in Israel, dominate the industry, followed by Revcontent and ZergNet, according to data analysis firm Datanyze. (The Times has a “From Our Advertisers” section on its home page that leads to posts created by its ad department without participation of the news and editorial staff.)

ChangeAdvertising.org analyzed the content ads on those 41 news websites and found that 61% came from advertisers or other prominent publishers. But 26% led to “clickbait” sites that were covered in more ads and lower-quality recommendation widgets featuring sexually suggestive or interruptive images. Almost all of those sites, which appear to be paying for placement, then profiting from their own ads once people visit, hid their domain registrations.

Sean Blanchfield, chief executive of PageFair, an advertising start-up, referred to the ad-filled sites as “arbitrageurs” that are “basically designed to try and get the user to click on something.”

Rob Leathern, a board member at ChangeAdvertising.org, called it “a pretty problematic state of affairs.” He said it was surprising that such pages were “one click away from these top 50 news sites.”

Readers are starting to express discontent. One recently criticized the Outbrain links next to a Slate article about preventing eating disorders — one of which was titled “6 Tips to Avoid Thanksgiving Weight Gain.” Another was shocked by a Taboola link headlined “Meet the Women Making Rape Jokes That Are Actually Funny” under a Fusion news story about an underage rape. One Twitter user asked The Guardian in April: “Don’t these @Outbrain articles kind of undermine the integrity of news outlets?”…

…A sample of six Outbrain recommendations on The New Yorker’s website on Oct. 5 showed the confusion readers may face when looking at content ads; several were legitimate, but one led to a spamlike “clickbait” site and another led to a fake health news site created by a marketing company.

Two led to editorial stories from AARP, which promotes its website through Outbrain and embeds the widgets on its own site.

«

Those panels (known as “chumboxes“) pay the news sites well – but they leach both trust and money away in the end. (I long ago set my adblocker not to show them, and paid to remove them from my WordPress site.) There’s a hint here that we’re at the start of a change in attitude to these. The New Yorker has killed them; others may well follow suit.
link to this extract

OLED leadership competition: Samsung, LG ignite war over OLED leadership by investing massively • BusinessKorea

Michael Herh:

»

LG Display and Samsung Display will make invest about 13 trillion won (US$11.6 billion) in flexible OLEDs this year alone to win new orders for the iPhone from Apple

Analysis says that their investment volume combined is a record high and the two global panel giants began a “do or die” fight over the flexible OLED leadership.

According to the OLED industry on October 30, Samsung Display accounting for 95% of the world small and mid-sized OLED market will make additional investment of 5 trillion won (US$4.47 billion) in OLEDs in the fourth quarter of this year alone.

As Samsung Display invested about 5.9 trillion won (in facilities from the beginning of this year to the third quarter of this year, the additional investment will raise Samsung’s total investment in OLEDs of this year to 10.9 trillion won (US$9.7 billion). The figure is Samsung Display’s record high annual investment in OLEDs. In the case of OLEDs, Samsung Display focuses on small and medium-sized OLEDs such as those for smartphones, tablets and notebooks. In the big panels, the company has no plan to invest in OLEDs since it LCDs such as quantum dot displays.

LG Display is also making full-scale investment in flexible OLEDs this year. This year, LG Display’s size of facility investment is about 4.5 trillion won, the half of which is going into flexible OLEDs. Massive investment amounting to about one trillion won in E5 Line in Gumi begun last year reached the stage to move in equipment so the line will begin to operate in the first half of next year. 

«

Wait, I thought Apple was buying its OLED from Sharp?
link to this extract

Assessing the damage to the Samsung brand after Note 7 recall • IDC

»

IDC surveyed 1,082 U.S. consumers through an online survey on October 17th and 18th, four days after Samsung decided to halt production on the Note 7. The survey focused on three groups of consumers: current Samsung smartphone owners (507), past Samsung smartphone owners (347), and smartphone owners who have never owned the Samsung brand (228). Due to the limited installed base, just 24 Note 7 users were captured in the survey; as such, data in those questions should be viewed as directional only.

“As challenging as the Note 7 recall has been for Samsung, the data in this survey indicate that most consumers are unaffected by this, which should be good news for Samsung,” said Ramon T. Llamas, research manager, Wearables and Mobile Phones. “For the minority of Samsung customers who are unlikely to purchase a Samsung smartphone in the future, the company has to win back consumer trust. Thus far Samsung has offered monetary incentives but, at the heart of the matter, consumers want to learn the root causes of the problem and how Samsung intends to fix them.”

Some key results from the survey include:

• Half of the 24 Note 7 owners polled said they have or will choose an Apple iPhone to replace their recalled phone, while 17% said they would choose another Samsung. Most said they will return their phone through a carrier’s physical store.

• The Note 7 recall doesn’t appear to be harming the broader Samsung brand so far. A majority of respondents said it would not impact future decisions to buy other, non-smartphone Samsung products such as televisions and appliances.

• Survey participants’ view of Samsung’s response to the Note 7 recall was largely neutral to positive; surprisingly about 13% hadn’t heard about the recall when polled.

«

That iPhone stat strikes me as remarkably high. I’d have expected more loyalty to Samsung.
link to this extract

One in five iOS devices in the US are limiting ad tracking • eMarketer

»

Advertisers are keen on collecting audience insight wherever possible, but as technology evolves, options exist for consumers to take them off their trail and ensure privacy. According to October research, 20% of iOS devices in the US have been opted-in to the OS’s limit ad tracking feature.

In October, a few weeks following the release of Apple’s iOS 10, mobile attribution and analytics provider adjust gathered data from iOS devices on its platform running iOS 10 or later. Overall, 18% worldwide had the limit ad tracking option enabled. The feature, which allows device users to block ads, first appeared in iOS 6.

«

link to this extract

Skyrim publisher gives up on game reviews—and it won’t be the only one • WIRED

Chris Kohler:

»

The blockbuster videogame is now officially Too Big to Fail.

Bethesda, publisher of Skyrim, Fallout, and Dishonored, said this week that it will stop providing advance review copies of its games to the media. This is an inconvenience for the likes of WIRED. But it’s a far bigger problem for you, the consumer who wants to know what you’re getting for your money.

Officially, Bethesda says in its blog post announcing the move was that it encourages skeptical players to “wait for your favorite reviewers to share their thoughts” before buying Skyrim Special Edition and Dishonored 2. But that’s something of a Hobson’s choice when Bethesda includes tantalizing extra content available only if you pre-order the games before they’re available—and, importantly, before reviews hit. Bethesda, and the publishers surely lining up to follow it down this road, want you to pay full price for a game before you know if it’s any good.

Beyond denying consumers the chance to make an informed purchase, this will spur a race to the bottom as game reviewers, desperate to be first to publish their thoughts, rush out whatever they can on the tightest of deadlines.

Make no mistake: the only winner is Bethesda.

«

Media, meet disintermediation. If the only winner is Bethesda, then it seems almost surprising that it has taken this long for Bethesda to arrive at this strategy.
link to this extract

Twitter’s new @Replies re-design isn’t just stupid; it’s really stupid • Medium

Tressie McMillan Cottom, a sociology professor and faculty associate at the Berkman Center for Internet + Society, found herself in a trial for Twitter’s new @ system, which allows tons more people to be included in Twitter “canoes” of replies, but doesn’t show you who is in said canoe:

»

[Now] when I try to respond to a tweet, I have no idea to whom I’m responding. What, pray tell, could be the problem with that?

Let me throw a few problems at you.

First, you should know how Twitter has learned that being known as a platform that facilitates harassment is bad for business:

»

Bloomberg is reporting that Disney chose not to pursue an acquisition of Twitter in part because it thought the bullying and behaviour of some of the ailing social network’s users might damage the entertainment company’s image.

«

Those of us who use Twitter and have identities that make us more vulnerable to harassment know this all too well.

Some of us have developed strategies to help us mediate that risk. I’ll share two strategies I have used and how this change undermines them.

«

This is such an amazingly bad implementation by Twitter. It’s hard to believe that its engineers are this tone-deaf about the problems on the network.
link to this extract

Lightbulb made of modified E. coli fuses biology and electronics • New Scientist

Alex Pearlman:

»

It could soon be possible to make a light source out of bacteria.

So says a group of students from Newcastle University in the UK who are attempting to combine electronic engineering and synthetic biology to create “electro-biological” circuits.

The students have turned genetically modified, glowing E.coli into something analogous to a light bulb. The bulb is meant to switch on when the bacteria experience heat stress from a miniature microbial fuel cell – a device that acts as a battery by harnessing electrical energy from the action of microbes.

The project will debut in Boston this week at the International Genetically Engineered Machine competition (iGEM), an annual global competition that ends in a synthetic biology science fair called the Giant Jamboree. The eight-person team from Newcastle is just one of 300 teams from 40 countries.

«

And then you swallow some of them.. and then your stomach lights up..
link to this extract

Is Facebook’s facial-scanning technology invading your privacy rights? • Bloomberg

Joel Rosenblatt:

»

While millions of internet users embrace the tagging of family and friends in photos, others worried there’s something devious afoot are trying block Facebook as well as Google from amassing such data.

As advances in facial recognition technology give companies the potential to profit from biometric data, privacy advocates see a pattern in how the world’s largest social network and search engine have sold users’ viewing histories for advertising. The companies insist that gathering data on what you look like isn’t against the law, even without your permission.

If judges agree with Facebook and Google, they may be able to kill off lawsuits filed under a unique Illinois law that carries fines of $1,000 to $5,000 each time a person’s image is used without permission — big enough for a liability headache if claims on behalf of millions of consumers proceed as class actions. A loss by the companies could lead to new restrictions on using biometrics in the U.S., similar to those in Europe and Canada.

Facebook declined to comment on its court fight. Google declined to comment on pending litigation. 

Courts have struggled over what qualifies as an injury to pursue a privacy case in lawsuits accusing Facebook and Google of siphoning users’ personal information from e-mails and monitoring their web browsing habits. Suits over selling the data to advertisers have often failed. 

This year, the U.S. Supreme Court set a “concrete injury” standard for privacy suits, a ruling that both sides are using to argue their case ahead of a hearing Thursday in San Francisco over Facebook’s bid to dismiss the biometrics case.

Google is fending off suits in Chicago, arguing that the Illinois statute can’t apply outside the state under the Constitution’s interstate commerce rules. Google also contends the Illinois law doesn’t regulate photos.

«

The UK has at least ruled that there is tort in unauthorised use of personal data.
link to this extract

Apple removes iconic startup chime from new MacBook Pro • Business Insider

Rob Price:

»

The Californian technology company is removing the distinctive noise that Macs make when they boot up, starting with the new MacBook Pro announced last week.

The change was first spotted by Pingie.com, which tested out one of the new laptops and confirmed that the noise is no longer made.

And an FAQ page that references the chime (referred to as the “startup sound”) for older MacBook models makes no mention of it for the new laptop.

Apple has used startup chimes in its Mac computers since the 1980s, settling on the most recent chime with the iMac G3, released in 1998. But now it’s finally being retired.

An Apple spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but it’s likely because of the way the new MacBook Pro turns on. It doesn’t come with a power button, instead automatically turning on whenever it is opened (when charged) — so there’s no need for a noise to indicate to the user that it is booting up.

«

I don’t understand that last sentence. Portable Macs have woken from sleep when opened since 1998 or so. But that’s different from booting up.

No chime, though? If you thought people were upset about the lack of updates for the iMac and Mac Pro last week, wait until they hear about this.
link to this extract

Forget Twitter, Netflix should be an acquisition target • ValuePenguin Singapore

»

What if this tech behemoth acquired Netflix and made the service entirely free to its device users (or provide a discounted rate)? Netflix’s popularity is growing rapidly, and it already has almost 90 million subscribers globally. This could potentially tilt the balance in Apple’s favor and be the boost that Apple has been desperately needing in terms of growing its market share. But could it be beneficial economically?

We think it will be. For example, take our back of the envelope calculation below. Apple currently makes about $600 per iPhone, which is typically replaced about every 2 years, and makes about 40% gross profit on the sale. This translates to roughly $113 of gross profit per year per device ($600 divided by 2 years and multiplied by 40% gross margin). In comparison, Netflix currently makes about $9 per month per subscriber, for a total of S$104 per year. This means that, even if Netflix were to become completely free to Apple users, Apple will be increasing economic value per customer by almost 10%! This math looks even better if you start to incorporate numbers for iPads and Mac, which have higher ASP than an iPhone.

Back of the Envelope Calculation on Apple and Netflix
iPhone ASP – $595
Replacement Cycle – 2 years
Adj Annual Income per Unit – $298
Gross margin -38%
Gross profit per unit – $113
NFLX Monthly ARPU [average revenue per user] – $9
NFLX Annual ARPU – $104

Caveat is that Apple will depend on the customers to remain loyal to its devices and services for a long time, but that’s the whole point; adding services like Netflix would be a great way to increase customer loyalty just the way Amazon has been adding stuff to its Amazon Prime program over the years.

Currently, Apple only commands about 12 % of the global smartphone market. Although Apple only competes in the high-end portion of the market, Samsung has a whopping 23% of the global market share. Even if Apple were to tilt the market to its favor by 3-5%, it could be increasing its revenue from iPhones by about 40%, which could pay for the acquisition in a matter of few years even if Apple were to pay a meaningful premium. 

«

Ben Thompson suggested Apple should buy Netflix in his daily newsletter on Monday too. I’m sure both companies have considered it. Is the price too high for Apple? Or does Netflix not want to sell? In many ways, Netflix is like Beats Music, but for video: makes good sense for Apple, little sense for anyone else who could buy it.
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

OLED displays are coming to next year’s iPhone, Sharp’s chief says. Photo by adafruit on Flickr.

You can now sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 13 links for you. Use them wisely. I’m charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Merkel: internet search engines are ‘distorting perception’ • The Guardian

Kate Connolly:

»

Angela Merkel has called on major internet platforms to divulge the secrets of their algorithms, arguing that their lack of transparency endangers debating culture.

The German chancellor said internet users had a right to know how and on what basis the information they received via search engines was channelled to them.

Speaking to a media conference in Munich, Merkel said: “I’m of the opinion that algorithms must be made more transparent, so that one can inform oneself as an interested citizen about questions like ‘what influences my behaviour on the internet and that of others?’.

“Algorithms, when they are not transparent, can lead to a distortion of our perception, they can shrink our expanse of information.”

«

The key point is that they’re not interrogable: we can’t trace back how they reach their conclusions. Humans, at least, can be asked.
link to this extract

Sharp president confirms new iPhones to adopt OLED panels • Nikkei Asian Review

Debby Wu:

»

Remarks by Sharp President Tai Jeng-wu, also an executive at Sharp’s parent company Hon Hai Precision Industry, better known as Foxconn Technology Group, came at a time when Apple is working on revamping the design of its flagship device to boost sales during the iPhone’s 10th anniversary next year.

“The iPhone has been evolving and now it is switching from LTPS (low-temperature poly-silicon) to OLED panels,” Tai told students at Tatung University, his alma mater, during a ceremony in which he was awarded an honorary doctorate degree.

“We don’t know whether Apple’s OLED iPhones will be a hit, but if Apple doesn’t walk down this path and transform itself, there will be no innovation. It is a crisis but it is also an opportunity,” Tai said.

«

Oops.
link to this extract

Facebook lets advertisers exclude users by race • ProPublica

Julia Angwin and Terry Parris Jr.:

»

Imagine if, during the Jim Crow era, a newspaper offered advertisers the option of placing ads only in copies that went to white readers.

That’s basically what Facebook is doing nowadays.

The ubiquitous social network not only allows advertisers to target users by their interests or background, it also gives advertisers the ability to exclude specific groups it calls “Ethnic Affinities.” Ads that exclude people based on race, gender and other sensitive factors are prohibited by federal law in housing and employment.

«

Not quite: you can’t exclude Caucasians. This is the most amazing blind spot on Facebook’s part. Moreover, it cannot pretend to be a “tech company”. It makes its money from advertising and it’s reliant on content. It’s a media company, just like a newspaper or TV broadcaster.
link to this extract

The inside story of Vine’s demise • Vanity Fair

Maya Kosoff:

»

The issues of resources and competing visions, however significant, seemed exacerbated by a slowness to develop new product features. “When we introduced music looping when I was there, it was the idea that you could add music to your Vines and it would loop perfectly,” one former employee said. “When I started, we were having those meetings. It took almost a year and a half for it to actually launch in the app, whereas Snapchat was launching something new every two weeks.”

Leadership was a problem, too. Vine operated nearly independently of Twitter. It was headquartered in Twitter’s New York office, while the rest of Twitter is stationed in the Tenderloin neighborhood of San Francisco. All three of Vine’s founders had left the company by October 2015. Twitter’s politics also took a toll on Vine. “There’s a bunch of different video things stewing around, but nobody has a clear vision for what video on Twitter should be, which was shocking,” a former employee told me. “As with all things at Twitter, it became a little more political. It became a little more like, ‘Well, who’s going to become the person who kind of runs all the video stuff?,’ as opposed to, ‘What the hell is our perspective on how video should work?’”

In Silicon Valley, there are really two kinds of companies: those that have good ideas, and those that can make money. Doing both is the ultimate goal, but Vine, along with untold numbers of on-demand delivery apps and novelty social-media companies, may have been the former, not the latter. Vine stars living in a luxury condo in Los Angeles may have loved the idea—as did Vine’s users—but the company never found its footing generating revenue. (Twitter itself is still figuring out a path to profitability.)

«

Salient point: Twitter had three video services running at once. That’s the inside view. And now for the external view…
link to this extract

Inside the secret meeting that changed the fate of Vine forever • Mic

Taylor Lorenz:

»

Last fall [in 2015], nearly 20 of Vine’s top 50 creators gathered in a conference room at 1600 Vine Street in Los Angeles to stage an intervention.

They were there to meet with Karyn Spencer, Vine’s Creative Development Lead, and other representatives from Vine in a last-ditch effort to save an app they saw was failing fast.

Marcus Johns, with 6.1 million followers, and Piques, a Vine star with more than 3.1 million followers, helped organize the meeting. They and their peers had noticed a sharp dropoff in engagement on the app. Johns and Piques owed their fame to the platform, and they were desperate to turn it around.

The stars had a proposal: If Vine would pay all 18 of them $1.2m each, roll out several product changes and open up a more direct line of communication, everyone in the room would agree to produce 12 pieces of monthly original content for the app, or three vines per week.

«

They also asked for Vine to deal with harassment and abuse (among other things). Which didn’t happen. Twitter, amazingly, considered the payment – then decided not to. And so Vine died.
link to this extract

Mac malaise • curtclifton.net

Curtis Clifton works at the Omni Group, which makes Mac/iOS software:

»

The real issues is that the Touch Bar is impressive tech looking for a problem. [Daring Fireball’s John] Gruber writes:

»

The Touch Bar is the answer to “These keyboard F-keys are cryptic and inflexible — what can we replace them with that’s better?” That’s an actual problem.

«

That is not an actual problem. Actual problems are user problems. What job does the Touch Bar do? None of the demos of the Touch Bar were compelling to me. Everything the Touch Bar does can be done on-screen with trackpad input or on a tablet with pen input. “But now you don’t have to take your hands off the keyboard!” Instead I have to take my eyes off the screen. That’s a win? No. It’s a gimmick.

The one actual problem the Touch Bar might address is discoverability. By showing controls that are appropriate for the user’s current task, devs might help their users find more of the power their software provides. I see two counterpoints here. There’s nothing stopping developers from doing that now without the extra hardware, and there’s a very good chance that the extra real estate will be used to overwhelm rather than edify. Just think what the team that designed Microsoft Office’s ribbons UI could do with yet another row of buttons.

That brings me to the heart of why the event was so disappointing. Apple is targetting casual users and sacrificing support for power users.

«

I’d like to know what sort of internal discussions Apple had in the past about various design changes in laptops, and what there was over the Touch Bar. This wasn’t done in a hurry. The design team created it – in response to the software team? The marketing team? Off their own bat? – and then the software team had to implement shortcuts for it in tons of apps, as well as the software to run it. That’s a lot of time during which someone could have said “You know what? This is stupid.” But then what do you get? The same devices as before, speedbumped. It’s notable that those who are most negative about the Touch Bar have never seen it. This is a common trope with new Apple features.

Instead of the Touch Bar, they could have made a touchscreen. Except Apple already has a touchscreen OS, and products which run it.
link to this extract

Apple’s new MacBooks: out of touch or just in time? • Forbes

Mark Rogowsky:

»

Many critics yesterday shared the view of Business Insider’s Rosoff and questioned Apple’s apparent intransigence to build a Mac touchscreen.

But while the desire for such a feature is understandable, its absence makes sense if you’re Apple. The company decided several years ago that touchscreen PCs offer a lousy user experience: Whether on a laptop or desktop, the screen is too far away to be easily pressed most of the time. To fix this, you need to first redesign the OS to support touch and then second redesign the hardware to get closer to the user.

Microsoft has performed a clever version of the latter with the new Surface Studio. But while that machine is gorgeous, at $3,000 and up, Microsoft will be lucky to sell 100,000 per quarter. In fact, for all the marketing and hype around Surface, the Pro tablet/PC hybrids sell only about 1 million in a similar time frame. These are products for the pundit class, to be sure, with apparently cutting-edge features and lots of legacy technology built in (USB ports, woot!).

«

The difficulty is figuring out to what extent the pundit class really has the pulse of the “ordinary” buyer. Do “ordinary” people buy a Pro device? The MacBook Air will do plenty well for most people who want USB-A and legacy connectors. If you’re a pro and buying a Pro, you might be able to spring for the extra cost of the connectors – and have a need for Touchbars and so on.
link to this extract

Why freemium apps suck for everyone (and how Apple is killing paid apps) • Cult of Mac

Graham Bower:

»

The reason we held out for so long against the switch from [insisting on having an app that is] paid-for to freemium is because, honestly, we think it sucks.

Last year I wrote a manifesto for classy app developers. I argued that app pricing should be clear and easy for the user to understand. Frankly, most freemium apps are anything but.

Take Pokémon Go for example. There is no way I would have downloaded this “free” app had I known that it would end up costing me over $40. Yes, I realize that I’m a grown adult and it is entirely up to me how much I choose to splurge on cute pocket-size creatures.

But my lack of impulse control aside, the fact remains that, like most freemium software, the total cost of ownership for the game is unclear at the start. When you download it, you really have no way of knowing how much storage, incense, lucky eggs and lures you will need to purchase.

To be fair, Pokémon Go is far from unique in this respect. In fact, these days this is pretty much the norm, which means I now avoid the temptation of “free” games like Madden NFL Mobile because I have absolutely no idea how much they are really going to cost me. Suddenly the price of the console version looks like a bargain.

Like Steve Jobs said about music, I believe that people want to own their apps. That way you know what the total cost will be.

«

In common with many before him, Bower argues that Apple should have offered the ability to get free trials, and that this would have “saved” paid apps. To which I’d say: what are freemium apps with IAPs, if not a form of free trial? OK, they’re not exactly the shareware model (use 30 days, then pay or discard). But you can get pretty close – watermarking, no-file-save, and so on.
link to this extract

The inevitability of being hacked • The Atlantic

Andrew McGill:

»

I switched on the server at  1:12 p.m. Wednesday, fully expecting to wait days—or weeks—to see a hack attempt.

Wrong! The first one came at 1:53 p.m.

This graphic is a simulation—a bot’s-eye view, if you will—but it’s the actual sequence of commands the hacking script used. It tried a common default username and password (root/root) and executed the “sh” command, giving it the ability to run programs and install its own code. My fake toaster doesn’t allow that, of course—it just cuts the connection.

The next hacking attempt, from a different IP address and using different login credentials, came at 2:07 p.m. Another came at 2:10. And then 2:40. And 2:48. In all, more than 300 different IP addresses attempted to hack my honeypot by 11:59 p.m. Many of them used the password “xc3511,” which was the factory default for many of the old webcams hijacked in last week’s attack.

The last attempted hack came 6 minutes ago using the username “root” and the password “xc3511.” (Yes, those are live figures; they were updated when you loaded this page.)

I’ll admit this volume of attacks might not be typical. I hosted my fake toaster on a virtual Amazon server, not an actual toaster hooked up to residential internet. Hackers aren’t typing these passwords themselves—they’ve programmed bots to do the hard work for them, scanning through thousands of open ports an hour.

«

Actual journalism: show people what happens, and how quickly. Nicely done, The Atlantic.
link to this extract

Sweden bans cameras on drones • BBC News

»

The use of camera drones has been made illegal in Sweden unless they are granted a special surveillance permit.

Under new rules set down by the Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden, camera drones qualify as surveillance cameras and require a licence.

Permits can be expensive and paying to apply for one does not guarantee it will eventually be granted.

There are no exceptions made for journalists, and critics have said the ruling could mean job losses.

In what some are describing as a “huge blow” to the aerial photography and camera drone industry, the court ruled that drone-mounted cameras are “regarded as surveillance cameras”.

Industry group UAS Sweden (Unmanned Aerial System) has argued that the court ruling could put 5,000 jobs in danger.

«

Petapixel says more than 20,000 drones were sold in Sweden in 2014, and more than 1,000 permits for commercial use.
link to this extract

Total nightmare: USB-C and Thunderbolt 3 • Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat

»

The core issue with USB-C is confusion: not every USB-C cable, port, device, and power supply will be compatible, and there are many different combinations to consider. The newest, most full-featured devices (such as Apple’s brand-new Touch Bar MacBook Pro) will support most of the different uses for the USB-C port, but typical older devices only support basic USB 3.0 speed and (if you’re lucky) Alternate Mode DisplayPort.

And it gets worse. Many USB-C peripherals are limited in various ways as well. Consider a simple USB-C HDMI adapter: It could implement HDMI over USB 3.0 or it could use Alternate Mode (native) HDMI. It could even (theoretically) implement HDMI over Alternate Mode Thunderbolt using an off-board graphics chip! Of these options, only the newest computers, like the MacBook Pro, would support all three. Can you imagine the consumer confusion when they purchase a “USB-C HDMI adapter” only to find that it doesn’t work with their MacBook or Pixel or whatever?

«

The capability for USB-C to screw things up really emanates from two things: all the legacy things that USB used to do; and all the display capabilities that USB-C is trying to incorporate. It also reminds me of the early days of Wi-Fi, when IBM was trying its damndest to push 5GHz 802.11a, while all the consumer-facing money was in 2.4GHz 802.11b.

“Standards”, eh. However, what USB 1.1 and Wi-Fi couldn’t do was this:

»

the issue of incompatible cables is even more serious. Many companies, including my go-to source, Monoprice, are building USB-C cables of various quality and compatibility. If you’re not careful, you can neuter or even damage your devices by using the wrong cable. Seriously: using the wrong cable can damage your machine! This should not be possible, but there it is.

«

link to this extract

Postimage.org — free image hosting / image upload • Postimage.org

»

Please contact us if you have a CDN [content delivery network] that is capable and willing of serving 1.8 Petabytes of outgoing traffic per month free of charge, or if you can make a donation to help us pay a monthly $12,000 bill from CloudFlare that we are now facing.

We have already received over $1300 worth of donations and counting. Thanks to everyone who is contributing; you rock!

«

Gee, you can’t serve 1.8PB (1.8 thousand TB, 1.8 million GB) for nothing? Shocking.
link to this extract

George Hotz cancels his self-driving car project after NHTSA expresses concern • The Verge

Sean O’Kane:

»

Hotz posted the full letter (which you can read here) to the Comma.ai Twitter account this morning. It was sent alongside a special order requesting more information about the Comma One, and The Verge was able to confirm its authenticity. Hotz also wrote that he “would much rather spend my life building amazing tech than dealing with regulators and lawyers. It isn’t worth it.” He went on to write that he was canceling Comma One, and that Comma.ai “will be exploring other products and markets.”

«

Amazing that the US road regulator would want to stop people putting potentially lethal one-tonne vehicles into the control of unproven software.
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified