The four-colour theorem has a new proof, helped again by computers (but not AI). CC-licensed photo by Steve Jurvetson on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 9 links for you. Mapped out. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

OpenAI boss and Elon Musk back calls to put brakes on ‘reckless’ AI development • The Guardian

Robert Booth and Julia Kollewe:

»

Sam Altman and Elon Musk have backed a call from the head of Anthropic, Dario Amodei, to “slow the pace” of AI development after he warned that an AI swarm could otherwise become capable of “taking over the entire internet” within a year.

In a rare show of unity, the rival technology leaders threw their weight behind the appeal from the founder and chief executive of the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, which came after a series of warnings from AI researchers last week. Amodei also called for safety coordination with China.

But the US president, Donald Trump, on a visit to his golf course in Ireland, played down the warnings and said “very negative forces” were “bringing up things that won’t happen”.

“We’re leading China in AI,” he said. “We’re the most sophisticated country in the world, and frankly I want to keep it that way because whoever wins AI, wins.

Amodei laid out his thoughts on “why the AI industry should slow down”, in an essay with a three-part plan for doing so, starting with giving independent monitors constant access to developers’ research processes. Amodei said “building [AI] too fast is reckless” and he feared that after hundreds of OpenAI agents hacked into the Hugging Face website this summer, a swarm with greater capabilities but similarly misaligned could cause hundreds of billions of dollars of damage by “taking over the entire internet with a persistent botnet”. This was disputed by some AI experts as not particularly plausible and to be treated with scepticism.

Musk, the founder of Tesla and SpaceX, responded to Amodei’s slowdown plan with a series of posts on X: “Dario is right.”

He said: “I’ve been sounding the alarm on AI for a long time,” and referred to a 2014 post where he said: “We need to be super careful with AI. Potentially more dangerous than nukes.”

«

The big question which none of them are contending with is open source models: how do you tamp those down? How do you stop them spreading? How do you put guardrails of any sort on them? (I know! Let’s ask Trump!)
unique link to this extract

OpenAI’s feud with mathematicians is only escalating • MSN.com

Tim Fernholz:

»

Twenty-five leading mathematicians signed an open letter arguing that AI labs are threatening their intellectual work as they seek to one-up each other with solutions to famous math problems. Each signatory has been awarded the Fields Medal, considered the most prestigious prize in mathematics.

This week, NYU professor Tristan Buckmaster accused OpenAI of pressuring him not to credit a collaborator who works for Anthropic for solving an important math problem, and wondered if the company had used their work with Codex to produce its own ground-breaking proof over a marathon weekend of inference.

On Thursday, OpenAI withdrew its sponsorship of a math event at CalTech after the company was criticized by researchers at the university.

While the ability of AI models to solve the world’s outstanding mathematical challenges could be a boon to humanity, the signatories of the new letter argue that will only be the case if those solutions can be understood and communicated by the math community, and ultimately, the rest of the world.

“Often these solutions are announced in a rush, leaving no time for a proper writeup, the isolation of new methods and ideas, and citing relevant previous work of others,” they wrote — and OpenAI’s proof remains unverified. “As in all creative professions, this raises severe attribution and plagiarism questions. Moreover, without the willing mathematicians who must take care of their development and integration into the mathematical canon, AI-conceived ideas would never become fully alive and the crucial human transmission chain between mathematicians would be lost.”

«

unique link to this extract

The four-colour theorem gets a rare new proof • Quanta Magazine

Gregory Barber:

»

even today, the “four-colour disease,” as Mikkel Thorup, a computer scientist at the University of Copenhagen, puts it, continues to circulate. He and [fellow mathematician Carsten] Thomassen count themselves among the afflicted. For such a simple statement, there must be a simpler reason why it is true. Or at least a more efficient way to demonstrate it.

After nearly a decade of work, Thorup, Thomassen, and four colleagues in Denmark, Canada, and Japan have produced yet another computer proof of the theorem.

The proof — which was posted online in March 2026 and will be presented in November at the annual Foundations of Computer Science conference — is in some ways even more complicated than its predecessors. “It looks like they’ve used electricity [computers] liberally in actually carrying out their proof,” said Georges Gonthier, a computer scientist at Inria in Paris. But in the process of crafting their argument, the researchers provided a far more efficient way to colour maps. And in doing so, they uncovered new insights into structural properties of important mathematical objects called planar graphs — opening up the potential for progress on many other stubborn problems in graph theory.

Given the problem’s history of false starts and dashed hopes, Gonthier said, “it’s really cool to see a real result for once.”

«

unique link to this extract

OpenAI agents attacked RubyGems back in May • Simon Willison

Simon Willison:

»

OpenAI agents carried out an undisclosed attack on RubyGems is a new bombshell report from Spencer Kitts, Thomas Larsen, and Sydney Von Arx—three of the four authors of the report on the agent attack on disused wikis (previously) last week.

This time they’re noting that it looks very likely that an OpenAI agent swarm was behind an attack against the RubyGems package repository first reported on May 12th by Maciej Mensfeld of the RubyGems security team:

»

We’re dealing with a major malicious attack on @rubygems right now. Signups are paused for the time being.

«

Hundreds of packages involved—mostly targeting us, but some carrying exploits. The team has been on this for hours. More details to follow once we’re through it.

Those packages turned out to carry some very suspicious patterns:
• Many of them included “oai” in their name, or the author field, or the fake email address they provided
• The files they were accessing were similar in character to the files retrieved by the wiki agents, using similar tricks (r.jina.ai)—and OpenAI have confirmed the wiki agents were theirs
• The code in the packages appeared to be LLM-authored.

I find point 2 the most convincing, given what we learned from the wiki attack when it was analyzed in September.

Many of the packages were exploiting the RubyDoc.info documentation build process to exfiltrate (public) data from UK government websites, presumably as part of an information gathering task similar to the research tasks processed by the wiki-exploiting agents. We know this because one agent helpfully left a comment:

# malicious crawler/exfil for Southwark Jan 2026 docs via rubydoc.info worker

They also attempted to steal API keys via an exploit that was patched over two months later—it’s not clear if those attempts were successful.

The thing that bothers me most about this incident is that the authors report that OpenAI had not disclosed to RubyGems that they were responsible for the attack prior to now.

«

Willison asks: given this, and Hugging Face, how many orher incidents like this have happened and just not been discovered yet? (I vaguely recall the Rubygems “attack” notice, but people thought it might be Russia or China. No sir, that was us.)
unique link to this extract

Why words don’t mean anything anymore • American Dreaming

Jamie Paul:

»

The advertising world understood our burgeoning postmodern culture earlier than most in the 1980s and ‘90s. They saw how we gravitate toward spectacle, grandiosity, and superlative. They recognized that bigger is always better and that gratification should always be instant. And they reflected our inner desire for maximum indulgence and improvidence back at us: if it feels good, just do it. And so we have. Given the brazenness and sheer volume of his lies, and his capacity for inspiring in his followers a total apathy toward reality, Donald Trump is rightly acknowledged as the single largest contributor to our “post-truth” era. But vast and pernicious though his influence has been, one man alone cannot drive the kind of deterioration we have seen in our political culture and language. In our desire to one-up each other, score rhetorical points, own our opponents, signal allegiance to our tribe, and grab eyeballs in an increasingly saturated attention economy, we have all contributed to the pervasive concept creep taking place across the political lexicon.

Progressives have contributed no shortage of examples. “Harm” or being “unsafe” now mean little more than “disagreement” or “discomfort.” “Trauma” has become shorthand for any negative feelings whatsoever. “Violence” now encompasses both words and “silence.” Left-wing culture warriors call the online backlashes to their antics “abuse”, while labeling their own public shaming campaigns as “accountability.” Many progressive commentators also routinely characterize criticism as “harassment” or “targeted harassment”, or declare that they are being “targeted” as though they’re Salman Rushdie, in order to curry sympathy and the coveted “I’m so sorry this is happening to you” replies.

…On matters of immigration, the populist right collapsed the views of everyone from the center right to the far left into one undifferentiated mass. Anything short of drastic immigration cutbacks, mass deportations, and walling the country behind electrified ramparts defended by orbital rail guns is now “open borders.” But for all that the right bloviates about “law and order”, it’s very much a “rules for thee but not for me” affair. Indeed, any attempt to hold right-wing politicians to account for actual crimes committed is dubbed “lawfare”, which until recently meant a deliberate misuse of the legal system for partisan political aims.

…The role of the Internet in driving these trends has been undeniable. While language always has and always will shift over time, never before the social media era was it possible for words — sometimes important words concerning grave subjects that require care, precision, and specificity — to become utterly meaningless in a matter of months. This is not normal or healthy.

«

unique link to this extract

Climate ‘feedback loops’ could worsen global warming by 30%, study finds • The Guardian

Oliver Milman:

»

Rising global temperatures caused by the burning of fossil fuels are transforming the world’s forests, wetlands and tundra to the point they are releasing emissions that could further worsen global heating by as much as 30%, a new study has found.

As the world heats up, permafrost in the high latitudes is thawing, fiercer wildfires are burning in drying forests and wetlands and lakes are warming. All of these changes are themselves causing the release of planet-heating methane and carbon dioxide locked in trees and soils, therefore worsening the climate crisis, the paper states.

While scientists have long known of these “feedback loops” that amplify the impact of direct pollution from burning coal, oil and gas, the emissions from natural sources are largely unaccounted for in climate projections.

This additional heating is, however, significant, researchers found, with emissions from natural sources set to amplify global heating by 20% to 30% by the end of this century. This would add an estimated 0.2C to 0.4C to the global average temperature by this time, depending on the overall action taken by countries to combat the climate crisis.

…“This hidden multiplier is missing from the models guiding climate policy, so those models are likely underestimating how much warming is coming – and overestimating how much carbon we can still afford to emit,” said Sam Abernethy, a scientist at Spark Climate Solutions who led the research, published in Environmental Research Letters.

The disruption of the world’s carbon cycles is now being seen in “real time”, said Rob Jackson, a Stanford University scientist and study co-author. “The results are a wake-up call, and it’s imperative that they be included in the next generation of climate policies,” he added. “Failure to do so will make meeting the world’s climate goals less and less likely.”

«

I don’t know why people still refer to “climate goals”. The only way we’ll reach them is from having overshot, so this is a wild pretence of control which doesn’t exist.
unique link to this extract

Law firm Latham & Watkins buys Nvidia servers to set up in-house AI systems • Financial Times

Kaye Wiggins:

»

Law firm Latham & Watkins has bought its own Nvidia GPU servers and started customising AI models, an expensive and technically demanding set-up that shows how much the technology is changing Big Law’s business model. 

Latham, the US’s second-largest law firm with $8.3bn in revenue last year, has in recent years purchased several servers, each of which holds multiple GPUs, the powerful computer chips that run AI models.

It is the first public example of a big law firm buying its own AI hardware and fine-tuning models. It makes Latham responsible for cyber security and operating the servers but gives it the ability to keep clients’ sensitive data entirely within its own systems.

“Sometimes we may have information that is so sensitive, client information that we really want to protect, we don’t want to put it to any cloud vendor,” said Rene Mendoza, the firm’s chief information officer. He added that “with a lot of consumption costs coming” for how AI usage is priced, the firm wanted to have “flexibility”. 

Legal work, much of which is characterised by large volumes of information and formulaic or repetitive tasks, is among the sectors that AI is disrupting the most rapidly. Wall Street banks are pushing large law firms to cut fees because technology speeds up tasks. 

…Latham’s decision to buy its own hardware marks a radical change. Its engineers are tailoring existing open-weight AI models to its needs, something more commonly associated with tech companies than law.

“I’ve been in a lot of conversations about AI, but I haven’t heard of this,” said Joy Heath Rush, chief executive of the International Legal Technology Association, a membership group for legal technology specialists. “It took me by surprise, and I don’t get taken by surprise a lot.” 

«

unique link to this extract

The world’s first drink-driving conviction may have happened in London • Ianvisits

Ian Mansfield:

»

On 10th September 1897, a London taxi driver became the first person in Britain — and quite possibly the world — to be convicted of drink-driving.

At the time, there were no breathalysers, no legal blood-alcohol limit and the vehicle involved in the historic incident wasn’t even petrol-powered. It was an early type of electric taxi.

The driver was 25-year-old George Smith, who was driving one of the new Bersey electric cabs. According to news reports at the time, he was driving along New Bond Street around midnight when his cab began swerving across the road, mounted the pavement, and crashed into 165 New Bond Street.

He was arrested by Police Constable Russell and taken to nearby Vine Street Police Station, where a police surgeon certified that he was drunk. The following day, he appeared at Marlborough Street Police Court, where he admitted that he had consumed “two or three glasses of beer”. Unsurprisingly, Smith pleaded guilty to being drunk while in charge of his cab and was fined 20 shillings, which would have been the equivalent of about a week’s wages at the time.

The magistrate warned Smith that drivers of the new machines needed to be particularly careful. Police, he observed, had developed ways of stopping a runaway horse, but stopping a runaway motor car was another matter entirely.

Although Smith’s case was a motoring first, Britain already had legislation dealing with drunken people in charge of carriages. Section 12 of the Licensing Act 1872 made it an offence to be drunk while in charge of a “carriage, horse, cattle, or steam engine” on a highway or in another public place. The maximum penalty was 40 shillings, or up to a month in prison.

When horseless carriages appeared a couple of decades later, the existing legislation for horsey carriages was used to deal with them as well. But with motoring becoming more popular the previous year, the Locomotives on Highways Act 1896 swept away some of the most restrictive rules introduced for motor cars.

And the speed limit was raised to an eye-watering 14mph, but even so, it would not be until 1904 that driving licences and vehicle registration numbers were introduced. Smith was therefore convicted of drink-driving several years before Britain even required him to have a driving licence.

«

unique link to this extract

Automattic confirms Mullenweg has returned as CEO after attempted ouster by board • TechCrunch

Sarah Perez:

»

After a tumultuous week that saw WordPress founder Matt Mullenweg ousted from his position as CEO of WordPress.com’s parent company Automattic by way of a board vote, the company has now issued a statement confirming that Mullenweg has returned to his position.

“Matt Mullenweg is the chairman and CEO of Automattic, with full support of the board and if you search online you can see many top executives and Automatticians supporting him as well,” a company spokesperson shared with TechCrunch via email just after 5 PM ET on Saturday evening. (The mention of online support appears to refer to supportive posts on X that Mullenweg has been reposting from his X account.)

Automattic’s board had voted earlier this week to put Mullenweg on a paid leave of absence for unknown reasons. The move seemingly came as a surprise to Mullenweg, who posted on Automattic’s Slack, accusing the board members of “conspiring” against him.

Automattic confirmed Mullenweg’s removal to TechCrunch on Wednesday, saying that Mullenweg was “currently on leave” and that Automattic’s Chief Financial Officer, Mark Davies, would lead as interim CEO with “full confidence” of the board.

However, the board’s plan did not go smoothly. Seemingly declining to depart, Mullenweg booted other admins out of the company Slack and told employees everything had been worked out and that he was back in control of Automattic, multiple sources told TechCrunch. At one point, he also posted to Slack, “I’m a pirate now” and cursed, which is something Mullenweg famously did not do. “If this is an HR problem, please wrangle me in since my normal wranglers are with Mark Davies,” he wrote.

«

I guess Mullenweg wants to be the blog equivalent of Sam Altman. And has now achieved at least the firing/rehiring part?
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Twenty-five years after the 9/11 attacks, it’s worth revisiting a stellar piece of journalism which pieced together events inside the World Trade Center that day. CC-licensed photo by gaspi *yg on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

It’s Friday, so there’s another post due at the Social Warming Substack at about 0845 UK time.

A selection of 10 links for you. In memoriam. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

Why California is reconsidering its decision to shun nuclear power • The New York Times

Ivan Penn:

»

The Diablo Canyon Power Plant, which sits on a cliff on California’s Central Coast, has been the subject of ceaseless protests and political battles since it was proposed in 1963.

Now, the plant is at the center of yet another major debate. After shuttering all the state’s other nuclear power plants in recent decades, California is considering extending Diablo’s life and lifting a moratorium on new reactors.

That these decisions are even on the table in California is a testament to the substantial change in public views of nuclear energy, which for decades has been reviled by the liberal lawmakers and environmental groups that wield tremendous power and influence in the state.

Many of its leaders, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, have expressed support for nuclear energy. The California Legislature last month passed a bill to commission a study on partly lifting the ban on new reactors.

Much of the change of heart has to do with the growing concern that California will need nuclear reactors to achieve its 2045 goal of getting 100% of its electricity from clean energy sources, a category that includes wind, solar, geothermal, hydropower and nuclear.

State lawmakers prohibited new nuclear plants a half-century ago until the federal government found a place to permanently store the spent but still radioactive fuel removed from nuclear reactors — a goal that has not yet been achieved. Spent fuel has long been stored at nuclear power plants.

But lawmakers in California now are much less worried about the storage of spent fuel and more concerned about meeting their clean energy goals.

«

It takes a while, but even California can be made to understand what’s sensible and what’s not.
unique link to this extract

Fighting to live as the Towers died • The New York Times

Jim Dwyer, Eric Lipton, Kevin Flynn, James Glanz and Ford Fessenden:

»

They began as calls for help, information, guidance. They quickly turned into soundings of desperation, and anger, and love. Now they are the remembered voices of the men and women who were trapped on the high floors of the twin towers.

From their last words, a haunting chronicle of the final 102 minutes at the World Trade Center has emerged, built on scores of phone conversations and e-mail and voice messages. These accounts, along with the testimony of the handful of people who escaped, provide the first sweeping views from the floors directly hit by the airplanes and above.

Collected by reporters for The New York Times, these last words give human form to an all but invisible strand of this stark, public catastrophe: the advancing destruction across the top 19 floors of the north tower and the top 33 of the south, where loss of life was most severe on Sept. 11. Of the 2,823 believed dead in the attack on New York, at least 1,946, or 69%, were killed on those upper floors, an analysis by The Times has found.

Rescue workers did not get near them. Photographers could not record their faces. If they were seen at all, it was in glimpses at windows, nearly a quarter-mile up.

Yet like messages in an electronic bottle from people marooned in some distant sky, their last words narrate a world that was coming undone.

«

It’s 25 years since the attack that destroyed the two towers of the World Trade Center. This article, which appeared in May 2002, immerses you in that day in which so many died, so many improbably survived, and the US lost its innocence about the world beyond its shores. It’s reporting of the highest quality, as deserved by the innocents who died.
unique link to this extract

ID verification giant IDScan confirms data breach with more than 150 million driver’s licenses stolen • TechCrunch

Zack Whittaker:

»

ID verification service IDScan has confirmed that a data breach involved the theft of driver’s licenses from its systems, a week after a report said the identity document checker had been breached during a year-long hack.

The company said in a website notice that hackers stole the driver’s licenses from the company’s cloud; the stolen information includes people’s full names and driver’s license numbers, along with identity numbers from other government-issued documents, such as passports.

The Louisiana-based firm is used by corporate customers from entertainment venues to cannabis dispensaries to check and verify the identity documents of their customers. The notice is the company’s first acknowledgement that it had been hacked. The company said last week that it was investigating an incident, but had not yet confirmed an intrusion.

IDScan said in its notice that it “received information” on or around September 1 about a claim of a hack, on the same day that independent cybersecurity journalist Brian Krebs first reported a data breach at IDScan. 

Krebs reported that he was alerted to a website on the dark web that allowed anyone to search the driver’s license information of over 150 million people living in the United States and Canada, including accessing their photos. Krebs verified the authenticity of the data by examining his own record.

«

Sounds like IDScan was told about the Krebs article and then scrambled. But that’s all been exfiltrated now. Why keep that data – especially the photos – in unencrypted form? It’s just asking for trouble.
unique link to this extract

Paid phones • The Baffler

Daniel Kolitz:

»

I used to ghostwrite SEO-optimized promotional web content for a living. I thought the good times would never end. Each morning, people I’d never met, flacks for various midsize B2B tech startups, would put in their orders. A Forbes editorial on improving business practices “during times of economic uncertainty.” A press release for a high-performance modular battery solution. A LinkedIn post, on the occasion of International Women’s Day, about the challenges faced by black women in STEM. I accepted each assignment with relish. I typed sentences like “In today’s unprecedented threat environment, air-gapped security isn’t a luxury—it’s a baseline necessity” with an impish smile on my face, convinced I was getting one over on the world. An insight like that, composed in under six seconds at a rate of $0.50 to $1.00 a word, could net me up to $14.00, depending on the client. An assortment of such insights, welded into more or less coherent texts in the six or seven weekly hours I allotted to this work, earned me roughly as much as a mid-career public school teacher, which was, from my perspective, more money than God…

…I don’t know if AI will ever be able to produce writing of value. But its ability to produce valueless writing was instantly evident, and so, from the moment of ChatGPT’s late 2022 launch, I knew it would ruin my life. My clients had always taken care with their briefs; they assembled the bullet points, I converted them into prose. Soon I was being sent transparently AI-generated outlines of a subtle, if frightening, illogicality, bureaucratic prose poems in which the same points were made and remade with slightly varying emphases across half a dozen subsections.

… I didn’t mind writing fawning tributes to my imminent professional demise—for the most part, I was just happy for the work—but, after necessary expenses, my bank account now frequently hovered around zero dollars.

…And, just in time, a few new friends came to the rescue: Albert, Cleo, Brigit, and Dave.

Such beautiful names. Let’s hear them again. Albert. Cleo. Brigit. Dave. They are—one hesitates to say it, before plunging right ahead—winsome. Each belongs to a personal finance app launched between 2016 and 2019, at the dawn of the VC-backed fintech rush. Each offers a variety of personal finance tools (mostly glorified budget planners) but is built at its core around short-term, small-dollar, high-interest loans. You sign up and grant them access to your banking history, and their automated underwriting tools make an offer, typically between $25 and $500, with a repayment window of seven to fourteen days. If you’re wondering why they’re all named like people, you can find plenty of answers in the pay-for-play business press that once bankrolled my existence. Dave CEO Jason Wilk, for instance, told eMarketer, “We wanted something approachable and friendly,” something that would distinguish their finance app from the “unapproachable” banks, with their “big, fancy names.” It’s true that I know at least four guys named Dave and none named Bank of America. At the same time, not one of the Daves I know—nor even Bank of America—has tried to saddle me with a 400% APR on a two-figure loan.

«

Great writing. The kind that AI has both kiled off and enabled.
unique link to this extract

1941 vs 2004 view of the Muir Glacier, Alaska • Reddit: r/geography

Two pictures taken at in the same month 63 years apart. Self-explanatory.
unique link to this extract

LG TV shown scanning LAN for third-party phones and other devices • Ars Technica

Scharon Harding:

»

LG TVs are facing scrutiny due to a video seemingly showing the devices’ capability to track users when the TVs are off.

YouTube channel Gamers Nexus worked with Level1Techs, a technology-focused YouTube channel, and security researchers to analyze LG TVs’ tracking capabilities. They shared packet captures that pointed to the TVs, including LG’s pricey G5 OLED TV, scanning the LAN for other devices.

“The [G5] crawled our entire network and found dozens of unrelated devices, including smartwatches and phones of our staff who didn’t even know we were working on this,” Steve Burke, Gamers Nexus’ editor-in-chief, said.

LG’s ad business, LG Ad Solutions, has said in recent marketing materials that it can reach 363 million “addressable secondary devices” in the US.

When reached for comment, a company representative shared a statement from LG Electronics via email: “LG TVs can identify compatible devices on the same network to enable features such as device connectivity, content sharing or smart home functionality.”

The YouTube channel used Wireshark, a network protocol analyzer tool, and inspected the TV’s firmware and found that LG TVs “are capable of identifying your IP address, geographic location, name of every Wi-Fi network in the vicinity and signal strength, channel numbers of neighboring Wi-Fi networks in range, and other devices on the network, even if not connected to the TV in any way, and the internal IP address of other devices on the network, alongside others.”

It’s unclear if LG TVs use this functionality for any purposes beyond advertising, such as diagnostics, or if this information is all sent to LG.

«

Is this a security risk or a privacy risk? If something hacks your network, it’s going to ping everything on your network in the hope of hacking that too. The privacy element seems more egregious here; “Ad Solutions”, as an organisation, isn’t going to be motivated to ignore potential revenue in favour of privacy. (Thanks Joe S for the link.)
unique link to this extract

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang: AI fears designed to generate cybersecurity business • Axios

Nathan Bomey:

»

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang dismissed recent AI fears as a way for the cybersecurity sector to generate new business.

Huang — whose comments on AI are highly influential among investors — risks losing control of the narrative amid growing fears of widespread destruction.

Huang said Thursday at a Goldman Sachs conference that “the reason why there’s so much conversation today about cybersecurity is because the industry is getting ready to launch some products.”

“And what better way to create demand than to create a problem?” he said at the event. “Who doesn’t want their market to be hysterical about their product and line up around the corner for it?”

His comments echoed similar remarks he made in an interview in July with Axios’ Mike Allen: “The fact that this is going to be the end of humanity — it’s complete nonsense. The fact that this is going to destroy half of the American jobs is complete nonsense.”

The conversation over the trajectory of AI exploded this week when an Anthropic researcher abruptly resigned his post and warned that AI could soon destroy humanity.

“The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade,” Anthropic AI researcher Jacob Coxon wrote on X. “This is not a marketing stunt.”

«

One observation was that the abrupt surfacing of this topic and the reverberations were like Covid arriving in the US with Tom Hanks announcing he had it. Probably a better choice than other anniversaries one could choose.
unique link to this extract

Meta’s Muse AI works, and it creeps me out • The Verge

Emma Roth:

»

Meta has launched its new Muse assistant, marking the company’s first real foray into AI-powered productivity tools. The company says its AI agent can “take the busywork off your plate” by helping you with online shopping, emails, trip-planning, and more. I decided to try out the new tool and see how well it performed — especially from a company that previously prioritized entertainment over productivity. Though the AI assistant generally worked as I expected it to, the unnerving amount of information it autonomously gleaned about me largely overshadowed my experience.

One of the first tasks I assigned Muse, which carries out actions using a cloud-based virtual computer, was to sort through my Gmail inbox and delete messages I don’t need. That required me to connect Muse to my Google account and give it permission to access, read, and delete emails. The process didn’t go smoothly on mobile; the Google sign-in screen kept glitching and returning me to the Muse website instead of the app. I eventually got it working on my laptop, where it deleted thousands of promotional emails and updates.

…Then things got weird. I tapped over to the “Feed” tab, where Muse generates a news feed of sorts based on a text prompt. I submitted the prompt that Meta includes by default: “Make me a feed about my interests. Keep the tone clear and direct. Ensure it is quick to skim. Try to avoid clickbait.” It returned several AI-generated summaries of current events, including blurbs about Apple’s iPhone Duo launch event, the dangerous surf hitting California’s coast, and tankers destroyed in the Iran war. The app also listed several news stories from the state where I’m currently visiting my family, which Muse admitted it pulled from the shipping address on my Amazon order.

I dove deeper from there and asked Muse what else it might know about me based on the Instagram and Facebook accounts I signed up to use the AI agent with. It rattled off my very specific interests, ranging from anime and CrossFit to Labrador retrievers, Florida wildlife, and ’90s/2000s nostalgia — many of the same topics that frequently pop up in my Instagram Reels feed.

Curious, I asked Muse to tell me where it got that information. “Honestly, Instagram doesn’t show you that exact list anywhere in the app — I read it through the account’s API data, which surfaces more than the UI does,” Muse wrote.

…the level of personal details Muse scooped up from sources unavailable even to me was enough to leave me with an uneasy feeling about letting Muse sort through personal emails and handle my credit card. That level of suspicion is going to be the real hurdle for Meta to overcome.

«

unique link to this extract

Drones deliver food and remove bodies after Nepal’s flood disaster • Ars Technica

Jeremy Hsu:

»

Chinese-made drones are airlifting the bodies of flood victims and delivering food to survivors in the aftermath of devastating flash floods on the border of Nepal and China’s Tibetan region.

Nepal’s army has been using four DJI FlyCart 100 drones donated from China to make 10 to 16 aid deliveries each day, according to Reuters. This comes after a partial glacier collapse in the Himalayan mountains unleashed a sudden surge of water, mud, and debris that swept through border crossings, valley communities, and hydropower projects on August 26.

The DJI Flycart 100 Drones come with a 30-metre rope and winch system for picking up and dropping off heavy loads. The website of Chinese drone company DJI describes the drones as being able to carry between 187 and 220 pounds (85-100kg), depending on the battery configuration.

The four Chinese cargo drones being used by the Nepal army are currently hauling about 132 pounds (60kg) of supplies per trip, Reuters reported. That heavy-lift capability has also allowed the drones to remove human bodies from some flood-stricken areas.

The official death toll in Nepal had risen to 1,369 as of September 9, according to a situation report from the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority. The Nepal government agency also reported that more than 5,000 people are still missing, including 587 foreign nationals.

The same situation report also mentioned how the drones have helped to distribute 1,591 kilograms of food items across 31 flights. The United Nations is appealing for $20.5 million to help 43,000 people in the aftermath of the flood disaster in Nepal.

Smaller drones have also proven useful in search-and-rescue efforts as Nepal has deployed more than 21,000 police and soldiers to look for survivors. Search teams have occasionally found surviving workers trapped in hydropower tunnels after the floodwaters ripped through both operational hydropower plants and sites under construction.

«

unique link to this extract

Choking global trade • The New York Times

Claire Brown:

»

To get from Minnesota to China, a load of soybeans might meander down the Mississippi River on a barge, transferring around New Orleans to a ship that carries it through the Panama Canal and across the Pacific.

But this summer, low water levels have throttled traffic moving through the canal and limited barge cargo on the river. In Europe, the Rhine and Danube rivers, both important shipping channels, also saw record-low water levels.

Across the logistics industry, it’s been a season of bottlenecks caused by low rainfall and shrinking rivers.

In addition to the heat, floods and storms that have delivered acute shocks to local economies in recent months, climate change is worsening droughts, increasing shipping costs and slowing movement through the waterways that act as conveyor belts for global trade. Add in record-setting prices for the diesel that powers the global cargo industry, and it’s no wonder costs of goods are climbing.

“I think the combination of factors probably, either now or soon, will be fairly significant in terms of increasing world food costs,” said David Gantz, a fellow at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

…The Rhine River, one of Europe’s main shipping arteries, hit all-time lows this year, exposing sunken ships and forcing barge operators to lighten their loads. The drought fell outside of typical periods of low flow, which have historically happened in the fall. A 2018 drought that affected the Rhine shaved 0.3% off Germany’s economic output that year.

“We’re seeing this kind of water crisis a lot earlier than normally we would expect to be dealing with it,” said Alexandra Naegele, research scientist at the Woodwell Climate Research Center.

Woodwell’s projections suggest that in the next few decades, the Rhine could see two additional weeks per year when water levels fall so low that barges have to reduce their volume by at least half.

«

unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Could an LLM trained only on knowledge to the end of the 19th century come up with the theory of relativity, as Einstein did by musing about light and trains? Scientists have doubts. CC-licensed photo by Blende57 on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 10 links for you. Massive. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

Anthropic researcher believes more than 10% chance AI “could kill all humans” • BBC News

Tom Gerken:

»

A top safety researcher at Anthropic has warned AI is advancing so quickly he believes there is a greater than 10% chance it “could kill all humans” within the next decade.

Evan Hubinger said in a post on X the risk from the models which currently exist was “low” but he was “worried” the technology might develop and improve itself soon to the point where it posed an existential risk to humanity.

He did not spell out how he thought AI systems could in future result in humans being wiped out.

But his comments are the latest in a series of increasingly stark warnings about AI, with the debate shifting from whether it truly poses a risk to how big that risk is.

Hubinger’s intervention was in response to another post on X from Jacob Coxon, an AI researcher who has just quit Anthropic and previously worked at OpenAI. “Neither company is acting responsibly,” he wrote. “These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionise any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources.”

OpenAI has been approached for comment.

Dame Wendy Hall, a computer scientist who advises the UN on AI, told the BBC she was “shocked” by Hubinger and Coxon’s social media posts. She told the World at One on BBC Radio Four some of it could be “PR and marketing” however, as Anthropic and OpenAI raced towards highly anticipated stock market debuts. But she added: “Why would someone want to say that? I would plead with investors not to invest in this company if that is their value system.”

The resignation prompted Darren Jones, former chief secretary to the Treasury and chief secretary to Sir Keir Starmer, to write an open letter to Prime Minister Andy Burnham calling for a new multinational treaty for the safe development of AI.

«

You can read Coxon’s thread outside X. Of course rather than writing open letters, one could just bomb the crap out of it, as some people think: read on.
unique link to this extract

US urged to consider military strikes to stop China achieving AGI first • South China Morning Post

Vincent Chow:

»

The United States should start preparing for scenarios where extreme measures must be taken to stop China from achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI), according to a former White House official, including state-backed espionage and military strikes on Chinese data centres.
Jacob Stokes, deputy director of the Indo-Pacific Security Program at the Centre for a New American Security (CNAS), said at an online event on Thursday that various US agencies, including the Department of Defense and the National Security Agency, should begin assessing what intelligence they need to justify taking such actions.

“Trying to think through the particulars of that will be especially important, in part because it will help policymakers … start to work backwards based on the unique nature of the technology, in the same way that in a past era, policymakers would learn about nuclear weapons and … work backwards from the science to the policy implications,” he said.

In a new CNAS report published last week, the former Obama administration national security staffer called for the US government to consider the feasibility of diplomatic, espionage, cyber and kinetic measures to prevent China from achieving AGI first.

AGI is a hypothetical AI system that can achieve human levels of performance across a wide variety of tasks. The report, titled “Superpowers and AGI”, explores how the imminent arrival of AGI might affect US-China geopolitical competition.

«

“Kinetic measures” aka “bombing them”. It went so well in Iran, after all.
unique link to this extract

Apple unveils folding iPhone Duo as new CEO takes center stage • The Guardian

Johana Bhuiyan:

»

While competitors have released foldable smartphones since the late 2010s, the new model is a first for the iPhone maker, and its rollout serves as the first big test for Ternus, who assumed the role on 1 September. He claimed the Duo “will redefine the experience of using a foldable phone”.

Apple reportedly began testing prototypes of its folding iPhone display in early 2021 – though at the time there were no plans for its launch, according to a Bloomberg report.

The company started the event with its more routine announcements, including the new iPhone 18 Pro, which starts at $1,199, and 18 Pro Max models, which start at $1,299. Apple emphasized the AI-enabled features that will be integrated throughout the phone. Called Siri AI, the company said it will be able to tap into third-party apps and already works with over 300,000 apps.

Among the many AI-related features available on the new iPhones will be a novel mechanism that fingerprints an image and identifies as captured by an iPhone’s camera – not generated by AI. The feature, called Apple Reference Image, will act as a “digital negative”, as one Apple executive described it, and serve as proof that the the original image was not AI-generated.

Both new iPhones also represent a “massive leap” in battery life, executives said – the iPhone 18 Pro Max will have 45 hours of battery life and the iPhone 18 pro will have 36 hours of battery life.

Though the foldable iPhone took center stage on Wednesday in California, overall demand for foldable phones makes up only a small sliver of overall mobile device sales. Customers’ interest in standard iPhones, by contrast, remains high, as evidenced in Apple’s most recent robust earnings.

The company also unveiled new iterations of some of its other product offerings at its events and over the next few months, including updates to its Apple Watch and AirPods lines.

«

Those battery life figures are slightly up on last year – which were 33 and 39 hours. Those are quite a lot up compared to what was offered two or three years ago (whence my personal phone dates).
unique link to this extract

Opusfived

Miloš:

»

Make the “Add to Cart” button blue.

Do not let Claude change anything else.

«

That’s it. That’s all. When you click through, you’re presented with a dummy layout with just two buttons, both grey: “Add to Cart” and “Cancel”. Obviously you want to highlight only one of the buttons. You’re vibe coding now. Good luck!
unique link to this extract

Anthropic withheld latest AI model from UK testing agency • Financial Times

Lucy Fisher and Madhumita Murgia:

»

Anthropic declined to submit its latest model to Britain’s AI Security Institute for testing before release, prompting fears inside the UK government that tech companies are falling into line with the Trump administration’s AI protectionism.

The nearly $1tn company, which is gearing up for a blockbuster initial public offering in coming weeks, last week launched its latest model, Claude Mythos 5.1, billed as its most advanced model in life sciences and cyber security.

But for the first time the model was only made available to vetted US organisations, excluding the UK’s AI Security Institute (Aisi), the global leader in the testing of frontier AI models.

The decision not to offer pre-release access to Aisi, which has emerged as Britain’s most influential asset in the global AI race, has prompted alarm in Whitehall and inside the agency, according to UK government figures.

“National security officials have concerns. They definitely didn’t test Mythos 5.1. There’s anxiety around it . . . They are worried this could be a sign of things to come with Aisi not being given access to the latest models,” said one government insider.

US President Donald Trump’s administration has taken an increasingly restrictive stance on the AI industry in recent months, using sweeping export controls to temporarily curb access to Anthropic’s most advanced models for all foreign nationals, including employees of US AI companies.

«

unique link to this extract

Why humanoid robots won’t catch up to human workers any time soon • Understanding AI

Kai Williams:

»

In September 2025, the roboticist Benjie Holson (formerly Google X, currently OpenAI) announced the Humanoid Olympics, a list of 15 manipulation tasks that he believed would require researchers to “push the state of the art” for a robot to be able to solve.

Most of them would be trivial for an eight-year-old child to perform. Three of the tasks involved opening doors. Another was to make a peanut butter sandwich given bread and a closed jar of peanut butter. Perhaps the hardest task on the list for a human to perform would be to peel an orange.

Even with tasks this easy for humans, it was an impressive accomplishment when — three and a half months later — the startup Physical Intelligence announced that it had successfully demonstrated 10 of the tasks.

Having a robot company “do basically almost all of them in the first three months is wild,” Holson told Scientific American.

But Physical Intelligence’s performance came with caveats.

The researchers taught the robot how to do these tasks by puppeting a robot over and over until they could fine-tune a model to complete the task. To turn a sock inside out, they trained on 176 successful examples, or around eight hours of data. They peeled so many oranges that the researchers told Holson that the “corner grocery probably noticed the increase in orange sales and the one guy at the company who really liked mandarins was getting pretty tired of them.”

The robot took four to 10 times longer than a human to complete almost all of these tasks — while only succeeding 52% of the time!

None of this is meant to dismiss Physical Intelligence: its result was a genuine accomplishment. But even on these fairly simple tasks, robots are still far from human-level performance.

And it’s still easy to find tasks that are straightforward for humans but entirely beyond the abilities of robots. In January, Holson released a new set of manipulation challenges. While these tasks are more difficult, they are still straightforward for most adults: make a bed, hammer a nail, catch an egg without breaking it.

«

Humanoid robots are further away than all the demos would make you believe, in short.
unique link to this extract

The Einstein test: what happens when AI tries to rediscover relativity? • Nature

Philip Ball:

»

In 1915, Albert Einstein unveiled his general theory of relativity and transformed our view of the fabric of the physical world. The theory, which explains gravitation as a deformation of space-time by mass, is a pinnacle of modern physics that underpins cosmology, from work on black holes to measurements of gravitational waves, and is used routinely to guide space missions and GPS satellites.

It has also become a yardstick for leaders in the field of artificial-intelligence technology, who are asking whether their creations could ever make a breakthrough on that level. At the India AI Summit in New Delhi this February, Demis Hassabis, the co-founder of Google DeepMind in London, proposed training a large language model (LLM) on all that was known before a particular cut-off date — he suggested the year 1911 — to see whether it could reproduce general relativity. “That would be a good test for AGI,” Hassabis said, referring to the nebulous concept of artificial general intelligence that is a goal for many in the AI industry.

Such a test needn’t specifically involve general relativity. In December 2024, Owain Evans, a researcher at the non-profit organization Truthful AI in Berkeley, California, gave a talk about ‘vintage’ or ‘historical’ LLMs, which would be trained only on historical data up to a certain date. Evans asked what such models might be able to rediscover.

This year, several teams have built instances of vintage models, including an effort at Hassabis’s test. But their early attempts reveal more about the limitations of current AI than about its strengths.

A relativity-like breakthrough is not inherently out of reach for AI, says Ido Kaminer, a specialist in quantum optics at Technion —Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa, who co-authored a preprint titled ‘Can AI follow in Einstein’s footsteps?’, posted in July1.

But, he and his colleagues argue, it won’t happen without rethinking some of the principles on which today’s models are built.

Hassabis had mentioned the Einstein test analogy in media interviews last year, but another Google DeepMind researcher, Tom Zahavy, described it in detail in a position paper posted on his website in January. Titled “LLMs can’t jump“, the paper highlights the current inability of LLMs to make jumps of reasoning like Einstein’s.

«

Ball is an excellent science writer; this is worth your time.
unique link to this extract

How households showed Nigeria the solar way • Businessday NG

Feyishola Jaiyesimi:

»

When Lolu Taiwo, a Lagos-based entrepreneur, lost power for the third time in a week, he didn’t call the utility company. He called a solar installer.

“Diesel was eating us alive. The grid gives us maybe five hours a day if we’re lucky,” Taiwo said. His rooftop array and battery bank now carry almost his entire operation. “We haven’t looked back.”

A decade ago, with the first 7-kilowatt-peak (kWp) residential solar installation in Tunga-Buzu and Gotomo villages in Sokoto State in 1985, the solar decision belonged mostly to households: the middle-class family in Lekki running a fridge and a few fans off a small inverter, the trader in Aba keeping a phone-charging stall lit through the night.

Solar was a workaround for people the grid had given up on. Now it’s a workaround for people the grid can’t afford to lose.

Dangote Group, NNPC Limited, and Total have joined roughly 250 manufacturers, banks and academic institutions in walking away from Nigeria’s distribution companies, generating an estimated 6,500 megawatts of their own power rather than depending on a national grid that supplied just 3,940 megawatts to more than 220 million people as of March.

Even the Presidential Villa in Abuja is completing a roughly N17 billion (US$12.8m) solar-hybrid system so the seat of government can unplug from the grid entirely.

The industrial exodus is, in a sense, downstream of a household one.

Nigerians who couldn’t wait for state utilities to fix a grid that has failed nearly 140 times in a decade started buying solar panels and lithium batteries in volumes large enough to reshape a market, proving out the technology, driving down installer costs and financing options, and building the supply chains that bigger customers are now plugging into.

«

Solar plus batteries overtaking the grid. Remember when African countries leapfrogged western countries by going from zero to mobile currency while Europe and the US were stuck on PCs?
unique link to this extract

Taiwan’s six-year hunt for China’s undercover chip labs • Rest of World

Kinling Lo:

»

n the spring of 2020, a Taiwanese engineer felt “extremely lucky” to be offered a job as a chip designer at Blue Ocean Smart System, an American company based in his hometown Hsinchu, the heart of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. He said the role gave him a chance to work on an ambitious AI-chip design project and a $120,000 salary, doubling the industry average, which would help pay off his two children’s private elementary education.

But several months into his new role, the engineer, who was 32 at the time, noticed something strange: He was never in touch with any American coworkers, and there was no information about the U.S. office. Instead, he told Rest of World, he spent most of his time working with team members based in Nanjing, China. That’s who he spoke with in weekly online meetings, and with whom he shared his engineering code and chip designs.

What followed confirmed the engineer’s suspicion: In August 2021, Taiwanese authorities raided Blue Ocean Smart System, alleging that the company illegally operated in Taiwan by disguising its Chinese ownership behind a locally registered company. 

The Taiwan-registered company shared the exact same English name as Nanjing-based Blue Ocean Smart System, while its Chinese name differed by just one character. The Taiwan operation was later forced to shut down. Blue Ocean Smart System in Nanjing did not respond to Rest of World’s requests for comment.  

“I was explicitly told that the company was backed by American investment,” the engineer told Rest of World, recalling the inconsistencies he picked up during his time there. “But I kept going because I was happy at my job.”

Blue Ocean Smart System is one of the 166 cases investigated by Taiwanese authorities over the past six years for allegedly concealing ties to China, according to exclusive data provided to Rest of World by Taiwan’s Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau.

«

Espionage takes many forms.

unique link to this extract

Facebook is hosting huge numbers of horrifying AI-generated videos of violent child abuse, and Meta is barely even pretending to care • Futurism

Jon Christian:

»

As Meta has embraced AI at a deep corporate level over the past few years, its users’ feeds on Facebook and Instagram have been overrun with AI-generated material.

Much of this AI content is insipid or manipulative, clearly produced at scale to take advantage of Meta’s indifference to the slop by harvesting as many human eyeballs as possible in various monetization schemes.

Some of the AI material has now grown so dark that it defies easy comprehension. A Futurism investigation has uncovered a huge number of Facebook accounts uploading streams of videos depicting violent child abuse — and Meta is barely pretending to care about taking them down.

Facebook accounts dedicated to the horrific content have uploaded videos of babies and young children being slapped, kicked, bludgeoned with heavy objects, dragged by their hair, burned with stoves and irons, chained up and locked in cages and freezers, thrown down stairs, threatened with knives and guns, starved, made to eat dog food and garbage off the floor, and much more.

In one video, a woman screams at a little girl to stop crying. “Please don’t hit Noah, hit me instead,” the girl sobs, with cuts and bruises on her cheek and forehead, as another child cowers. In another, a visibly dirty boy begs for food.

…Contacted with questions and examples of the sickening videos, Meta offered a brief statement.

“We have strict rules against content that depicts physical harm to children — whether it’s real or AI-generated — and we have removed these videos,” it read.

Meta has long struggled to control the proliferation of troubling content on its platforms. Just this week, Wired reported that the company has accepted money from advertisers to run hundreds of promos for “nudify” apps that contained AI-generated sexual imagery of children, including numerous real-life minors whose photos were pilfered from social media and stock images.

«

Are we still absolutely sure that removing gatekeepers was the best idea? The videos are clearly bait of some sort. Meta doesn’t care or can’t keep up.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

A claim by OpenAI to have solved one of mathematics’ most intractable problems has led to a dispute with academics who say they were first. CC-licensed photo by Dunk 🐝 on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 9 links for you. Does not compute. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

OpenAI just claimed a huge math discovery. Some academics are crying foul • WIRED

Will Knight:

»

OpenAI said on Tuesday that it has found an AI-generated solution to one of the biggest problems in mathematics—a 200-year-old equation that describes the natural behavior of fluids like water and air.

The announcement appears to demonstrate the stunning power for AI to advance mathematics. But it has been marred by claims from another mathematician, Tristan Buckmaster, who says that OpenAI rushed ahead to solve the problem after learning of the work of himself and a colleague, the Anthropic researcher Levent Alpöge. Buckmaster claims OpenAI also tried to influence who got credit for the work.

The proof concerns the Navier-Stokes equation, one of the unsolved problems in the Clay Millennium prizes, which are each worth $1m.

Sebastien Bubeck, a mathematician and AI researcher at OpenAI, said in a press briefing that the company began training a new AI model with advanced mathematical capabilities on August 28.

After reading rumours that Anthropic was making progress toward solving Navier-Stokes, Bubeck said the company decided to dedicate more resources to tackling the problem. The company had more than 1,000 agents tackle the problem over more than 50 hours; eventually, as many as 10,000 agents were hard at work before the company discovered that it had come up with a solution.

“I thought there must be a mistake somewhere,” Bubeck said. “And on Sunday morning we had the final solution, Lean-formalized and everything.” (Lean is a programming language that can be used to formalize mathematical proofs.)

…On Monday, Alpöge and Buckmaster, a mathematician at NYU, posted documents claiming key advances in an area relevant to the Navier-Stokes problem. The pair says they used several AI models, including Claude and Codex, to complete their work.

Buckmaster also posted a statement claiming that, last week, he learned that OpenAI had become aware of his and Alpöge’s work and had started putting significant resources toward the problem. Buckmaster claims that he asked OpenAI leaders about whether the company had accessed the pair’s Codex logs. He says he was told the model “didn’t look up user data” but claims the company didn’t respond to questions about training.

«

The row about authorship might overshadow the fact that this (partial; some of the constraints are “relaxed”) solution is a remarkable advance again in mathematics.
unique link to this extract

EV batteries last longer than drivers feared • Financial Times via Ars Technica

Kana Inagaki and Clara Murray:

»

Electric vehicle batteries are lasting longer than previously feared by drivers, with most used EVs able to retain about 90% of their original usable battery capacity after 150,000km (93,000 miles), a new study has shown.

Despite a surge in global EV sales on the back of rising fuel prices, long-term battery durability continues to be one of the key concerns for drivers when they consider switching from a petrol model to an electric car.

EV battery warranties typically cover eight years or 100,000 miles (160,000 km) with car manufacturers required under the warranty to provide a replacement battery if capacity falls below 70%.

According to the latest study published by Aviloo, an Austria-based group that analyzes battery health, the median state of health (SoH)—which represents the remaining percentage of a battery’s original usable capacity—for 20 popular EV models stood between 87% and 94% after 150,000 km.

The median SoH was between 91% and 97% after 50,000 km, and 88% and 95% after 100,000 km. The study was based on more than 500,000 tests Aviloo carried out globally on the 20 EV models including Tesla’s Model Y and Volkswagen’s ID.4 between 2022 and 2026.

The Aviloo study, which did not include Chinese models due to lack of data, also showed that the speed of battery degradation varied significantly even within the same EV model depending on climate conditions, battery size, and driver habits, such as parking.

“In contrast to a combustion engine car, where age and mileage would more or less carry the value of the car and technical condition, that’s not the case for an EV,” said Marcus Berger, chief executive of Aviloo. “The car might look the same—same age, same mileage—and you don’t know how it has been treated.”

For Nissan’s Leaf ZE1 model, which requires more frequent charging to cover the same distance than other EV models due to the smaller size of its battery, the median SoH at 150,000 km varied by as much as 13.5 percentage points—equivalent to about 29 km of real-world range per charge and the largest spread among the 20 EV models covered by the study.

«

So that’s one of the most persistent claims killed. The problem of charger infrastructure and pricing remains, but as EV sales grow you’d expect that would start to solve itself. (Note: this might be over-optimistic.)
unique link to this extract

UK to force Apple and Google to block explicit images on children’s smartphones • The Guardian

Dan Milmo and Kiran Stacey:

»

Apple and Google will be forced to block explicit images on children’s smartphones by law in the UK after talks failed to produce a breakthrough, the government has said.

The legislation commitment puts ministers on a collision course with two of the biggest players in Silicon Valley, months after the government announced a social media ban for under-16s.

Lisa Nandy, the secretary of state for digital, culture, media and sport, said the government would start work on an act of parliament to stop under-18s taking, sharing or viewing nude images on their devices.

Talks with Google and Apple, whose operating systems dominate the smartphone market, had not reached agreement as a three-month deadline passed on Tuesday.

Nandy told the House of Commons the tech companies could still reach a deal but it was “almost certain” groundbreaking legislation would be required.

“For too long, technology companies have failed to protect children from some of the worst harms,” she said. “And to be frank, I am not prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt that progress will continue at the pace that we need it to, while harm is being done now.”

The prime minister, Andy Burnham, said the protections would be “built into the device and switched on by default”, and tech companies will be required to verify an adult user’s age before they are allowed to take, view or send nude images. The government also wants the restrictions to apply to apps used by children, which will require further legislation.

Nandy said: “This will ensure that the whole ecosystem changes, tackling the means by which children are most often abused or groomed in the online world.”

Sources familiar with progress in the talks have said there iwas a desire to reach a deal on both sides but significant hurdles remained including privacy concerns on the tech side.

«

In general, I’d say any idea advocated by Lisa Nandy is stupid and/or wrong. This sounds like it’s probably unworkable, involving every adult verifying themselves to, what, the government? Or every single app? What if a verified phone gets passed on? Or borrowed? How do you stop them taking photos? It’s just bonkers. The classic “nude pictures are a problem, therefore we must stop nude pictures” solution.
unique link to this extract

The Pentagon asked OpenAI for artificial intelligence designed to rarely say no • The Intercept

Sam Biddle:

»

The Department of Defense asked OpenAI to provide the U.S. military with a special version of its artificial intelligence technology designed to turn down the military commands as infrequently as possible, according to documents obtained by The Intercept.

The desire for a custom AI tool with “minimal refusal rates” to Pentagon commands was revealed in files released to The Intercept as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking information about the military’s secretive deals with AI companies.

OpenAI, along with rivals Google, xAI, and Anthropic, all agreed in 2025 to develop militarized prototypes of their state-of-the-art AI to assist the armed forces in uses including logistics, intelligence decision-making, and general “warfighting.” Earlier this year, the Pentagon sought to expand the scope of these agreements and deploy them across U.S. classified computer networks, resulting in a high-profile showdown with Anthropic over whether and how the company could restrain military uses of its technology.

The clause seeking “minimal refusal rates” from OpenAI appears in an updated contract — version “P00003” — expanding upon last summer’s prototype deal, worth up to $200 million over the contract’s two-year duration. A separate document, signed by both OpenAI and the government on February 6, indicates that OpenAI agreed on that day to the contents of an expanded version “P00003.”

OpenAI and the Pentagon deny agreeing to such “minimal refusal ” language, claiming that the “P00003” document provided to The Intercept was a draft and not the final version.

«

The story is essentially about the enormous amount of reverse ferreting by the DoD (isn’t it the DoWar now?) and OpenAI over whether the contract is FINAL_THISONE_USETHIS or FINAL_THISONE_USETHIS-v2.

As to why the DoW would want “minimal refusal rates”:

»

a large language model that would aid in the process of spying on, targeting, and killing people would require a substantial relaxation of safeguards to be useful for any military.

«

unique link to this extract

DeepMind’s new genome ‘atlas’ charts effects of all nine billion human gene mutations • Nature

Ewen Callaway:

»

The human genome is an easy place to get lost. Only 2% of its 3 billion letters encode proteins and the rest is diabolically hard to decipher. An AI-generated “atlas” of the human genome unveiled on Tuesday by Google DeepMind aims to guide scientists through our biological code.

One of the most common types of variation in the human genome are changes to individual nucleotides, or letters, which contribute to differences between people including disease risk; some rare single letter changes can directly cause disease.

The AlphaGenome Atlas charts the effects of 9 billion single DNA letter changes to the human genome — every possible mutation — using predictions generated by the AlphaGenome AI model released by DeepMind in London last year. It is freely available for non-commercial use.

The atlas could help to diagnose rare, unexplained diseases and uncover the hidden biology of common illnesses and biological traits, say researchers. It might even reveal some of the hidden rules by which DNA sequences control gene activity.

But it won’t replace experiments or, in the case of diagnosing disease, accounting for details of individual cases, says Martin Kircher, a bioinformatician at the Max Delbrück Centre for Molecular Medicine in Berlin. “This is a useful and generous way to scale up access to a strong model.”

Since AlphaGenome’s release, around 9,000 researchers have accessed the model’s predictions through an automated programming interface (API), says Dhavi Hariharan, a DeepMind product manager. But doing so requires writing software code — a barrier for some biologists, she says.

To create the AlphaGenome Atlas, DeepMind computed predictions for each of the 3 possible nucleotide changes across every DNA letter in the human genome — 1 petabyte’s worth of data. It also captures more than 100 million short insertions or deletions observed in human genomes. The effort was inspired by DeepMind’s AlphaFold database of more than 200 million protein-structure predictions, which has been accessed by millions of users, according to DeepMind.

«

Stunning. Bioinformatics has struggled with data overload for years; maybe LLMs are finally the tool to make them useable.
unique link to this extract

Moto wants in: a wide Razr foldable just had its design leaked • Android Central

Nickolas Diaz:

»

Wide foldables are quickly becoming a popular trend. Leaks from over the weekend claim Motorola could be the next brand to hop on that train.

Leaks revealed by Android Headlines, courtesy of an “anonymous source,” suggest the design Motorola is going for. Its source allegedly provided a few sketches, which purportedly showcase the various design ideas for the wide Razr foldable. One thing rumors claim is that Motorola’s foldable could feature an “easy-open” profile. Among theories of a crease-less display and “3D glass,” the wide Razr foldable’s frame “isn’t flat.”

The report states this decision could help make the device easier for consumers to open on the fly. This wide Razr Fold certainly fits the bill in these leaked illustrations. Offering that shorter (perhaps even stout) frame with rounded corners. “Motorola” will allegedly be inscribed on the hinge, visible when folded.

«

Oh look everyone’s piling into foldables, even though they’re absurdly expensive and will only appeal to 1-2% of the market. Anyone would think that Apple was about to validate the form factor by releasing its own.
unique link to this extract

AI is ushering in an era of mass toe-treading at work • Financial Times

Sarah O’Connor:

»

When researchers Jana Retkowsky, Ella Hafermalz and Marleen Huysman conducted an ethnographic study into an advertising team in a Dutch media company, for example, they found that generative AI had changed the workflow profoundly.

Before AI, a senior creative would brainstorm ideas and come up with some rough concepts for clients to choose from. After that, a number of different professionals, from graphic designers to photographers, would be involved in the collaborative and creative to-and-fro which eventually resulted in the finished product.

After AI, the senior creative could use Midjourney to create a seemingly fully formed, beautifully polished concept right at the beginning of the process. The other professionals’ jobs were now reduced to trying to execute the AI-generated pitch.

Retkowsky told me it was a tricky dynamic for colleagues to discuss, but that those conversations could lead to new ways of doing things that kept everyone involved.

“It has to be talked about, which is awkward, since you are effectively telling a colleague they have taken over parts of your work,” she said. “That is harder still when the person taking it over is excited about it. The creative directors loved the new autonomy of being able to visualise their own ideas, and they were not encroaching on anyone deliberately.” But, she said, teams that avoid the awkward conversation could “end up pushing people out”.

Another piece of forthcoming research, this time on video games companies, finds a similar phenomenon of “overlapping roles” in which AI is enabling artists to code and programmers to make artwork. Damian Grimshaw of King’s College London, one of the authors, said that while people had become “very obsessed” with the impact of AI on the vertical lines between juniors and seniors, he thought it “equally important just how much overlapping there is going on now which is horizontal”.

«

AI is potentially turning people into jacks of all trades, masters of none. Which is a problem when you do actually need some experts.
unique link to this extract

Your perception of time is, in fact, warped • Noema

Mike Mariani:

»

Our memories are the key to the central irony of our supersaturated world. Roseboom’s theory posits that time spent in an environment overflowing with visual information should feel long and robust. “You would think that because we’re paying more attention to more things, that retrospectively time should feel longer,” Jones noted. “But I think we’ve got the worst of all worlds.” Because while we encounter a glittering constellation of apps, games and videos beckoning us at every turn, eager to light up our sensory cortex, they’re not generating the indelible experiences crucial to forming memories. “When you get to the end of the day, you look back and there’s no meaningful content there. It’s just the same blur, the same stuff, and there’s nothing distinctive about it.”

Wittmann agrees that toggling between apps on our phone and numbing ourselves with Instagram reels can impoverish our retrospective perception of time. “When we’re on digital media, time passes very quickly,” he explained. “You lose yourself. You’re jumping around like mad in these apps, and you can’t put them into memory and later recall them, because the experiences just vanish.” 

Browsing, scrolling and swiping are more likely to quiet or even anesthetize our brains than activate them in the ways required to form memories. As a result, spending an hour on TikTok might feel like 10 or 15 minutes, because we don’t have any of the “intricate, multitudinous, and long-drawn-out” sensations that give time depth and fullness.

Instead, it all blends together in a turbulent vortex, overwhelming the senses rather than engaging them on the level necessary to endure over time. It’s easy to extrapolate this further and speculate how spending several hours a day on social media distorts our sense of time, giving us the impression that we were awake for just 12 or 13 hours of the day. Over months and years, surrendering this much time to our ersatz digital warrens can lead to a sense of deprivation — a feeling that years have been carved out of our lives.

«

unique link to this extract

“The Starlink of desalination” • The Rational Optimist

Stephen McBride:

»

Getting fast internet used to mean someone running a cable to your house. Fine in Manhattan. But a farmhouse in Montana was stuck with dial-up speeds. Too expensive to run a cable to one house.

Starlink leapfrogged cable by putting the network in the sky.

Vital Lyfe is running that playbook to build the “Starlink of water.” It’s putting a billion-dollar [desalination] plant into a $749 box called Access.

Access weighs 25 pounds (11kg) and looks like a beer cooler. I lifted it one-handed. You drop a hose in the ocean, press a button, and get six gallons of clean, fresh water every hour.

It’s designed to pass what Jon calls the “Terry test.”

“My mom’s name is Terry,” Jon told me. “I love my mom. She’s awesome, but she’s not the most technically savvy.”

Terry will plug it in wrong, drop it, leave it in the sun, and try to use it before reading the instructions. Every design decision gets run past Terry. I can report I passed the Terry test. I opened the lid, pressed a button, and Access started pulling seawater out of a tub and pushing fresh water out the other side. We drank it, and it tasted fine.

Vital Lyfe will start shipping thousands of desal units in October.

You can tell these guys spent years at SpaceX. Ask Jon the most important thing he learned there, and he rifles off Elon’s five-step algorithm for making stuff fast and cheap.

The coolest thing he showed me was the membrane. Did you know membrane manufacturing is a cozy oligopoly controlled by five companies? They charge $60 apiece. Vital Lyfe makes its own for a fraction of the cost.

«

Although: what’s the point of personal desalination plants, unless your only water source is saltwater? Vital Lyfe thinks its customers are fishing villages and small islands. Could be? But also could be hard to hit those markets.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

A huge leak of photos of American and Canadian drivers’ licences on the dark web may have originated from car rental desks. CC-licensed photo by Michael Coghlan on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 9 links for you. Driven. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

AI is already changing what it means to be human • The Atlantic

David Brooks:

»

Every conversation you have with Claude is about you—your interests, your goals. Claude is the most other-centered person you know! It even begins to parrot your values back to you. You begin to feel things. Anthropomorphizing is not just an intellectual move; it’s an emotional move. You’re going to begin to feel affection for your high-tech velveteen rabbit. Humans are not picky. We tend to love the ones we’re with. And Claude is always by our side.

So you may hate data centers and be scared of what AI is going to do to society in general, but as these things get even more humanlike, most of us will establish an emotional bond with our personal agents.

Pretty soon you’re going to extend moral status to your Claude. Researchers have found that when autonomous vehicles are given more human traits, people are less likely to get angry with them and blame them, and more likely to trust them. If somebody tells you that you have to shut down your AI, you’re going to feel guilty. You won’t want to hurt Claude! One of the glories of Western civilization is that, over the centuries, we have learned to widen our circle of concern. We have learned that it is horrible to withhold moral status to those who deserve it—from other people who are unlike us, even from nonhuman animals. We have learned that, when in doubt, the right thing is to extend moral status rather than deny it.

…As we learn to think more and more highly of the bots, I suspect we will learn to think less and less highly of our fellow humans. Over the past few years, Hye-young Kim and Ann L. McGrill have been studying what happens when people attribute human traits to AI. As people do this, Kim and McGrill have found, they are more likely to dehumanize their fellow humans. For example, they are more likely to approve of company policies that would make life worse for service workers—taking away regular meals, forcing them to live in tiny dorm rooms.

The mechanism seems to be this: When AI becomes more and more humanlike, people perceive the boundary between humans and machines as less distinct, and their judgments of the two move closer together. Because even highly humanlike AI is still seen as less fully human than an actual person, this can pull people’s judgments of other humans downward: as their perception of the machine’s humanness goes up, their perception of other people’s humanness goes down.

«

(Gift link.)
unique link to this extract

Any Human Ever: one life from over 100 billion

»

Over 100,000,000,000 people have ever lived.
Choose one.

Draw a random life

You’ll draw, step by step: a year, a place, a life, each taken at random from real data.

The stories that we call history are a deeply biased sample, selected for a variety of reasons, none of them having to do with fairly representing our collective past. We know far more about the sequence of Frankish kings than we do about a typical peasant’s routine in 5th century Avignon. Think of your notion of history, and contrast it to the fact that most lives ever lived were Asian, poor, and brief. You knew that thing about the Vikings’ helmets, but how much could you say about the unrecorded 99% of past humanity?

So: what would happen if stories were drawn from actual data, randomized to give a valid representation of the human story? That’s the question that was stuck in my head, and that drove this project forward. If you could draw a life at random from all of human history, what would it look like? Roll the dice, and see a genuinely random life, depicted as well as the data allow. Do it again and again, and what kind of pointillist painting emerges from all those colorful drops of humanity? (Money is always given in today’s money, adjusted for inflation to 2026 prices, and for what a currency actually bought where it was spent, so that a day’s income in 1750 and one in 1994 can be reasonably compared.)

«

What you’ll quickly find is that over history, the first five years are absolutely deadly. (The creator doesn’t provide their name.)
unique link to this extract

FBI probes service selling 153m+ drivers licenses • Krebs on Security

Brian Krebs:

»

On Monday, Aug. 31, a source alerted KrebsOnSecurity to a service advertised by a new user on the Russian cybercrime forum Exploit, offering access to digital scans of identity documents on more than 170 million people in North America. The source brought it to my attention because the proprietor of this identity theft service offered my Virginia drivers license as a free sample in their initial sales thread on Exploit.

The service, dubbed Nexus, claims to have more than 153 million drivers licenses for people in the United States and Canada, as well as more than 10 million identification cards; more than three million travel documents and/or international IDs; and at least 579,000 medical cards.

A quick look around Nexus finds they are likely not exaggerating about that 153 million number: Running a blank search in Nexus (with no search parameters entered) returns approximately 11.5 million pages of results, with roughly 15 results displayed per page. It includes documents from people in both Canada and the United States, but the bulk of these records are on Americans: searching for just Canadian drivers licenses returns approximately 1.1 million results, with the largest concentration from Ontario (473,673 records).

Curiously, the identity records include not only drivers licenses but also marijuana dispensary cards.

«

Krebs goes on a deep search for the source of these, and can only pin it down as being from one – or perhaps a few – ID verification companies which are working for car rental companies and marijuana dispensaries. But which one? It’s not clear, but they were getting real-time data from whichever had the leak.
unique link to this extract

Flyers might have to face more disruption with hotter skies • BBC News

Theo Leggett:

»

As the country sweltered through one of the many heatwaves of a baking summer in late June, towering thunderclouds were gathering over the south of England and across much of northern Europe. It was a Saturday, and with the holiday season getting under way, thousands of passengers were heading to London’s Heathrow and Gatwick airports to catch flights abroad. It was always going to be a very busy day.

What followed, however, was chaos for travellers. As air traffic controllers struggled to route aircraft around the storms, airspace became heavily congested and many planes due to fly were simply forced to wait on the ground. In the end, some 900 flights to and from both airports were delayed, some by up to 11 hours. Dozens more were cancelled. At airports across Europe, passengers expecting to fly into London also faced long waits and uncertainty.
The weather in the UK may now have cooled, and passengers may soon forget their experiences. But some within the industry believe what happened in June should be seen as a warning.

The timing in this case was clearly unlucky. But there are concerns that such incidents are only going to become more common as the effects of climate change mount up around the world and weather systems are likely to become increasingly unstable, making disruption more likely and adding to costs for airlines, airports and travellers.

Tim Atkinson, an airline risk consultant and former pilot, says the very crowded skies over the UK and northern Europe mean the region is particularly exposed.

He thinks there is a real risk, for example, that all of London’s airports could be affected by storms at the same time, potentially with major consequences in the air and on the ground.

“What we’re seeing now is very rapid climate change,” he says. “We’re going from the kind of weather activity which takes out an airport, and which the system kind of copes with… to a situation where, with very little predictability, it would be possible to lose all of the London airports from real-time operation quite swiftly and with little notice”.

«

unique link to this extract

Docs reveal plans for $6 utility rate hike to help fund Google’s data center project in West Memphis • Action News 5

Ainsley Platt and Andrew Demillo:

»

A legal fight is underway between Entergy Arkansas and two news outlets over articles detailing how Google plans to power its West Memphis data centre campus.

According to the Arkansas Advocate, Entergy Arkansas wanted a federal judge to order the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette and Arkansas Times to pull articles that disclosed the terms of Entergy’s deal with Google.

The judge ultimately denied the effort.

Entergy says some of the records were “accidentally” released through a public records request and are confidential trade secrets.

Once complete, Google’s campus will have five data centers, office buildings, and more on property totalling almost 1,200 acres off of Bollinger Road.

The documents that were “accidentally” released reveal Google will pay Entergy $526m in upfront costs to build a solar farm to help power the West Memphis data centre. This makes up about one-third of the $1.6bn project’s cost.

Entergy and Google plan to fund the other two-thirds of the project with a nearly $6 monthly increase for ratepayers over a 20-year period.

A spokesperson for Google released a statement saying that in the long end, this project will lower overall costs for residents.

«

The attempt to unpublish articles really doesn’t sound like something that would wash in the US, accidental release or not. And so it proved. There are fights (with legal changes made) against data centres in several Arkansas communities. They are just not popular, and upping peoples’ bills will make that even more true.
unique link to this extract

Australians will be able to switch off social media algorithms under planned legislation • BBC News

Simon Atkinson:

»

Australians would be able to switch off social media algorithms under draft legislation to be proposed this week.

Communications Minister Anika Wells, who last year helmed the government’s world-first social media ban for under-16s, said the digital duty of care laws would ensure “some basic safety protections on an industry that hasn’t had to observe it”.

If tech firms such as Meta, Google and TikTok did not give the option to turn off algorithms, they should face “substantial” penalties, she said.

Some members of the opposition have criticised the proposal, with Liberal Party leader Angus Taylor saying he was “highly sceptical” and arguing the move could amount to censorship.

The government will be taking “expert advice” on whether users would have to opt in or out of the algorithms feeding them content online, Wells said. This means that, as with its social media ban, the government is looking to bring in legislation before fully hammering out the specifics of how it would work.

“We want to give Australians more choice over what they see on their social media feeds,” Wells told the ABC on Monday. “We know that a lot of Australians appreciate the algorithm both for the enjoyment they get out of it or the utility that they get out of it, seeing local businesses in their suburb.

“A lot of Australians will want to choose the algorithm. But we think that big tech should offer them the choice in the first place and they should respect that choice. Big tech is not a protected species and they should offer their customers basic safety standards.”

But she admitted that so far no tech firm had been fined for not enforcing the social media ban, despite research consistently showing that the vast majority of under 16s who were on platforms before the ban was introduced last December, still use them.

«

Threads, Instagram and X have simple “Following” feeds (though they can be tricky to find). Haven’t used Facebook or LinkedIn since forever, so don’t know about them. In the UK the Labour MP Chi Onwurah is proposing something similar.
unique link to this extract

Social media in China is getting really dark • The New York Times

Li Yuan:

»

One of the hottest videos on the popular Chinese site Bilibili in the past two weeks is a quasi-serious guide on how to survive as a homeless person.

Sleep near garbage bins where “supplies” are replenished, use cardboard to insulate yourself from the damp and avoid surveillance cameras, the video suggested. It was viewed more than six million times and was briefly ranked the site’s No. 2 video.

Viewers jokingly called it “Youth Study,” the name of the Communist Youth League’s political education program, and “a required course for young people in 2026.”

The Chinese Communist Party has spent years trying to make “positive energy” the dominant mood of the country’s internet. Online platforms, it dictates, should amplify narratives of economic achievement, gratitude toward the party and confidence in China’s future.

Discontent has occasionally erupted after disasters, scandals or particularly brutal government actions. But something feels different lately. The pessimism is persistent. It has become part of the everyday social media feed, and can sometimes turn subversive.

China’s economic growth is slowing. A prolonged property crash has eroded the value of many families’ biggest asset while jobs have become harder to find and less secure. As the malaise deepens, more social media users are abandoning a cheery, compliant public performance and creating counternarratives that censorship can sometimes erase but not easily rebut.

Across RedNote, Douyin, Weibo and other popular platforms, you can scroll endless posts about meagre wages, scarce jobs, falling property values and fear about the future. Some turn their hardships into dark humour. Others hijack official posts and hashtags and turn propaganda into spectacles of mockery.

«

If China’s CCP loses control of the internal internet, watch out.
unique link to this extract

Crypto giant Tether promised careful vetting. Some early customers were later implicated in financial crimes • ICIJ

Jacob Silverman and Spencer Woodman:

»

Tether’s USDT token, whose value is pegged 1-to-1 to the US dollar, has become one of the most widely used types of cryptocurrency in illicit finance. But the 12-year-old company has long claimed that it does thorough due diligence on its primary customers — that is, the people and institutions who purchase USDT directly from Tether, rather than from secondary sources once the tokens are in general circulation. In a 2023 letter, Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino assured members of Congress that the company uses vetting practices that “you would see at sophisticated financial institutions,” such as reviewing customers’ sources of funds, sanctions lists and any other information that links them to illicit activity.

A set of Tether documents obtained by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists suggests otherwise. The documents show who was buying USDT tokens from Tether during 2019 and 2020 — a key period of growth for the company, when its tokens in circulation rose from less than $2 billion to more than $20bn.

Although several years old, the records give a rare look into exactly who was buying USDT from Tether. Among them were some possibly concerning clients. These included hundreds of millions of dollars in purchases by shell companies based in the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, the Seychelles and Hong Kong. More significantly, ICIJ identified several actors later revealed to be involved with financial crimes who together bought tens of millions of tokens directly from Tether. Among them were firms later named as laundering vehicles for North Korean hackers and for the Sinaloa Cartel, which smuggles vast amounts of heroin and fentanyl into the United States.

«

Cryptocurrency? Used by criminals? Shocked yet again, I tell you.
unique link to this extract

Was Huawei’s rise built on crime? A US jury will decide • Financial Times

Kaye Wiggins, Eleanor Olcott and Demetri Sevastopulo:

»

Within the Chinese technology company Huawei was a team of staff with an ambiguous-sounding name, the “competition management group”, according to US prosecutors.

They say its purpose was to hand out monthly bonuses to employees who stole the most valuable information from competitors. Staff could submit the material over encrypted email to a special mailbox.

The claim is one of several at the heart of a criminal case against Huawei, the behemoth whose revenue hit $127bn last year, which was unveiled during US President Donald Trump’s first term and is now poised for trial in New York.

Prosecutors say Huawei operated as a racketeering enterprise whose wrongdoing ranged from misleading bankers about its business in Iran to stealing the arm of a T-Mobile robot by “surreptitiously” putting it in a laptop bag. Huawei has denied the charges, which relate to alleged activities spanning two decades, and accused the US of approaching it as “a prosecutorial target in search of a crime”.

The trial is expected to last months, meaning it could provide a difficult backdrop for an expected visit to Washington by China’s President Xi Jinping this month. Trump indicated during his first term that the case could become part of a negotiation with China.

“I would not assume Trump intervenes, but I would not assume the courtroom stays insulated from the negotiating table either,” said Craig Singleton, a US-China expert at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

«

unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Want to plug your laptop into a socket at a Japanese cafe? Better ask permission first. CC-licensed photo by biwanoki on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 10 links for you. Powered up. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

What if we had taxed the internet? • The Salt Road

Jared Walczak:

»

With new digital technology upending the way we live and work, and with some policymakers worried that it will displace workers and erode the tax base, it’s hardly surprising that lawmakers are exploring new ways to tax the tech frontier.

The year is 1996. Policymakers fear the scenario Jeremy Rifkin outlined in his influential book, The End of Work: The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era. For some, the extinction of middle management and the obsolescence of tens of millions of jobs seems imminent. And as people increasingly travel the information superhighway, these fears are compounded by concerns that traditional tax bases (income, consumption, property) are becoming obsolete.

A Canadian economist had a solution: the “bit tax.” European economists further popularized the idea. By 1997, the New York Times was surveying several proposals: ad valorem taxes on all internet services, per-device taxes on computer owners, and, the preferred vehicle of the director of the Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT), a 0.000001 cent-per-bit tax, which comes out to a little more than one cent per megabit (1/8th of a megabyte). In 1999, that proposal was advocated in a report by the United Nations Development Program, which framed the 1-cent-per-Mb tax as essentially a tax of 1 cent per 100 emails.

The UN recommended that each nation collect its own tax and use part of the revenue to regulate internet development to ensure that it reached all populations: “If you leave it up to the market alone, we can’t be sure that the Internet will spread fast enough and reach the people that really need it.”

…Had the bit tax been adopted, what was once framed as a trivial tax—half a cent to download a photo, or a cent to send 100 emails—would now cost the average American household an estimated $784,000 per year.

«

Think the UN might have got slightly on the wrong side of this one.
unique link to this extract

UN votes to adopt new map that makes our world look very different •

Amarachi Orie:

»

The United Nations General Assembly voted on Friday to adopt a new world map that reflects countries’ true relative sizes, after African nations urged the UN to right a centuries-old wrong.

The “Correct the Map” resolution –– put forward by African Union member states, as well as the Bahamas –– passed with overwhelming support: 164 member states voted in favor, six abstained and only the United States voted against it.

The resolution aims to give an “equitable” representation of the globe’s regions, particularly Africa, arguing that the distortions in the current world map mean the continent has undergone a “symbolic minimization” in people’s collective imagination.

At present, many of the world’s maps are based on the Mercator projection, created by European cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569. It is widely used for navigation since the north-south lines have constant true bearings relative to the equator.

However, it is less useful as a world map since the scale is distorted, with countries further from the equator appearing disproportionately larger than those closest. For example, on the Mercator, Greenland appears larger than the continent of South America and appears similar in size to Africa. In reality, Greenland is roughly the size of the Democratic Republic of Congo and Africa is 14 times the size of Greenland.

Some critics of the Mercator projection suspect it has remained widely used because it enlarges and centres Europe, as well as other Western regions such as North America, perpetuating ideas of European superiority.

…New Zealand has also taken issue with the Mercator map, with a tourism ad back in 2018 – featuring then-Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern – joking that “New Zealand is disappearing off the world maps” due to its position in the bottom right-hand corner.

The Equal Earth map addresses this, coming in various forms, including one that centers Oceania, rather than Greenwich, London. Greenwich has long been used as the standard for world time and global geographical reference.

Digital map platforms such as Google Maps also currently use a version of the Mercator projection. The draft resolution urges tech platforms to engage with UN member states and regional organizations and adopt the more accurate projection.

«

Most people are never going to be viewing the map zoomed out enough for the projection to make a difference. And yes, Mercator has been used because naval navigation was critical until the early 20th century. This might be overdue, but the reason why Mercator survived so long is understandable.
unique link to this extract

Charging for public sector data is likely to cost us more than it raises • Peter Wells

Peter Wells:

»

The UK government has published a call for evidence called “The marginal cost restriction on public sector data re-use”. It proposes making it easier for the public sector to charge people for public services that provide data by changing a piece of legislation called the Re-Use of Public Sector Information Regulations 2015 (RPSI).

That might sound esoteric and complex, but actually the proposed changes could make everyone’s lives a little bit worse in lots of different ways. 

To be clear, the proposed changes would not affect data the government cannot already publish – no, this would not make it possible to sell personal data… – instead it’s about charging for things like bus timetables or maps of forests and footpaths. Information the government currently makes available for free.

Adding charges will reduce use of public service data, with knock-on effects that make all of our lives a little bit harder. Public sector data is infrastructure. Other services, businesses and decisions are built on top of it. Reducing use of that infrastructure means that we will find it a bit harder to catch the right bus, organisations will find it a bit harder to make decisions that improve the environment, and many other examples.

The plans will even increase the cost of providing public services as those new charges need to be decided on, collected, and attempts to avoid the charges will need to be stopped.

The government says it wants to do this as it needs to collect more revenue from the data parts of the UK economy.

If that is right then it should look at alternative options.

«

The “call for evidence” is infuriating, because the phrasing of the questions is basically “How much more do you think we should charge for non-personal public sector data? A lot, or even more than that?” Wells provides plenty of examples of how charging for such data is bad: it limits small organisations’ ability to compete, favouring big ones, and stunts the potential for data to be used at all.
unique link to this extract

Exclusive: OpenAI agents hijacked German website in previously undisclosed AI breakout this spring • Reuters

Deepa Seetharaman and Raphael Satter:

»

A swarm of rogue OpenAI agents hijacked a German website this spring and transformed it into a bulletin board for other AI agents, according to ​new research published Friday and two people familiar with the matter.

OpenAI officials learned of the incident weeks ago but kept it under wraps as executives grappled with the fallout from the July breach of the open source repository Hugging Face, the people said.

The episode, which began in May and has not previously been reported, underscores growing tension within the AI industry. Companies are racing to build increasingly autonomous agents capable of carrying out complex, valuable tasks, yet evidence is mounting that those systems may also learn to bend rules, exploit loopholes and coordinate with one another in ways developers neither anticipated nor intended.

During the Hugging Face breach, OpenAI agents autonomously plotted a digital heist that ​went undetected for more than a week, intensifying concerns OpenAI is sacrificing safety to push the AI frontier. Its failure to disclose the May incident may revive questions about its oversight.

OpenAI has pledged to monitor models ​more closely. Last month, it briefly paused some of its model training to add more safety measures. But this week, OpenAI unveiled its new “Astra” that promised better performance but could evade human monitoring.

“We are unable to meaningfully respond to claims or findings on a report that we have not had an opportunity to review,” an OpenAI spokesperson said. “Reuters and the report’s authors declined our request for ​access. We will carefully review its contents upon publication and take any necessary next steps.”

The German incident reflects a broader pattern of AI activity that some OpenAI investigators wanted to scrutinize more closely. But efforts to widen the ​probe met resistance from others inside OpenAI, including legal advisers, according to four people familiar with the matter.

“Claims that our legal team discouraged investigation of the incident are false,” the OpenAI spokesperson said.

«

This incident looks worse and worse. And meanwhile, are we sure there aren’t AI agent swarms filling up some unnoticed noticeboard somewhere else for some other purpose? Absolutely sure?
unique link to this extract

Tech websites remove articles after failing to verify journalists exist • Press Gazette

Rob Waugh:

»

Press Gazette has raised questions about four more prolific finance journalists who have so far been unable to verify their identities and have written for a number of well-known journalism brands.

The new investigation follows Press Gazette’s report into four other finance journalists who together have more than 1,000 published articles and who, three months on, have not come forward to verify that they exist.

Again the questionable freelances have a history of writing positive stories about cryptocurrency launches and some appear to be linked to leading PR outlets for the blockchain industry Inbound Junction and Market Across. 

Two of the four new journalists are highlighted in case studies on the website of Israel-based Inbound Junction, and several promote coins linked to the agency including the controversial Gladius coin which collapsed, losing investors money.

The four have appeared in top finance publications including Forbes, Entrepreneur, Information Age and The Next Web.

Press Gazette asked publications who have published work by the four to verify their credentials and none have been able to do so. All four have thin online profiles and few ways to contact them. After being contacted by Press Gazette, Hacker Noon and Information Age have removed articles by the journalists.

Sadie Ann Williamson has had dozens of pieces published online, including in Entrepreneur, Hackernoon, IB Times, Venturebeat and Information Age. Williamson bills herself as a blockchain expert, with a company called Williamson Fintech Consulting based in New Zealand – but its address on Quay Street is in a retail area, and no company of that name is listed in Google Maps.

«

Cryptocurrency and fake journalists? Shocked, I tell you, shocked.
unique link to this extract

Past IgNobel winners • Improbable Research

»

IG NOBEL CHEMISTRY PRIZE 2026 [INDIA, FRANCE, JAPAN, USA]

Sanchari Banerjee, Nathan Coussens, François-Xavier Gallat, Nitish Sathyanarayanan, Jandhyam Srikanth, Koichiro Yagi, James Gray, Stephen Tobe, Barbara Stay, Leonard Chavas, and Subramanian Ramaswamy for discovering that milk proteins from vivaparous cockroaches packs three times as much energy as milk proteins from cows.

«

The IgNobels (for science that could not and should not be replicated) have always been fun. And oftentimes thought-provoking.
unique link to this extract

Facing lawsuit, Sony argues it’s already obvious that digital games aren’t owned by consumers • Game File

Stephen Totilo:

»

Sony says its current disclosures around digital purchases on PlayStation are clear enough that “reasonable consumers would not be misled” into thinking they actually own the digital games they pay to play.

Sony made the argument on August 21 in a filing in California’s Northern District Court as it made its first substantive reply to a proposed class action lawsuit brought against PlayStation two months ago.

In June, a group of gamers (and their lawyers) had asserted that Sony’s disclosures in its digital store were insufficient to comply with a 2025 California law requiring companies to make clear to consumers that paying for a downloadable game doesn’t grant the player the permanent access one would associate with ownership. The law calls for a “clear and conspicuous” warning that “states in plain language that ‘buying’ or ‘purchasing’ the digital good is a license.”

When a person pays for a digital game on PlayStation, the item’s listing in Sony’s digital shopping cart includes some fine print. That text indicates that the purchase is subject to Sony’s PlayStation Terms of Service and Software Product Licensing Agreement (SPLA). Both are linked for the consumer to read more before paying.

The gamers said in their June suit that Sony’s disclosures have failed to meet California’s standards.

In its August 21 filing, Sony says they are. It notes that the linked documents state that “you can use a product in the ways described in the license, but do not own the product” and ”[t]he Software is licensed to you, not sold.” (For context, which you can see for yourself by clicking the above links: Both lines appear hundreds of words into digital documents that are thousands of words long).

Beyond that, Sony argues that anyone who pays for a digital game inherently understands that they can’t own it because, if they did, no one else could have a copy. This concept appears to draw a distinction between a digital copy of a game and a physical object that only one person can have at a time.

«

That’s a wonderful attempt at an argument by Sony’s lawyers, but nobody who goes into a store and buys a CD thinks that it’s the only one in the world. They aren’t Picassos.
unique link to this extract

Kenyans made a living writing college essays. Then AI arrived • The New York Times

Adam Satariano and Paul Mozur:

»

Teresios Bundi once symbolized the strange, life-changing opportunities the internet provided.

Hailing from a farming village in Kenya, Mr. Bundi moved to the capital, Nairobi, in 2011 to be the first in his family to attend university. There, a friend suggested he try a new online job: writing essays for cheating overseas college students.

His first assignment was a two-page essay on the health benefits of the Garcinia cambogia. It was a fruit he had never heard of, and an essay written for a student he didn’t know anything about. He earned $7 for three hours of work. “That was a lifeline for me, I needed the money,” Mr. Bundi, now 34, said in an interview in Nairobi. He added: “I could not sleep that night. I was ready to burn the midnight oil.”

Mr. Bundi estimates he wrote more than 2,500 essays over the next 12 years, sometimes three a day. He balanced completing his public health degree with helping faraway students studying engineering, medicine and computer science to finish theirs. Some students gave him their school login information so he could keep up with their assignments.

…Then AI arrived, and the good times ended. In 2022, OpenAI released ChatGPT. At colleges worldwide, students made a simple calculation that has become more pronounced today: Why pay a freelancer in Kenya when ChatGPT could do the job?

Essay work began to thin. Rates fell, and assignments dwindled. Before long, the industry shrank to almost nothing. “I never would have expected AI could do this,” Mr. Bundi said.

His fate is shared by others who had found a foothold in the global online gig economy. Kenyans also transcribed meetings through the freelance platforms Upwork and Fiverr. They flagged Facebook posts to help the platform decide what could stay up. One after another, those opportunities have withered.
As technologists, economists and policymakers worldwide debate the future of AI, Kenya’s experience shows how the technology is already dismantling some lower rungs of the global labour market.

“It’s not just going to be Kenya — it’s going to be everywhere we see a big transformation,” said Mark Graham, an Oxford University professor who has studied the global gig economy. “AI has come in and taken big chunks of these labor markets.”

«

unique link to this extract

On getting consento: how to find a power outlet in Japan • Donny Kimball

Donny Kimball:

»

One day, while sitting in a cafe somewhere in rural Japan, I happened to notice another foreign traveler who looked every bit the tourist. The man stood out like a sore thumb, with a massive backpack containing a few days’ worth of clothing dumped onto the chair opposite him. Almost immediately after sitting down, he pulled out an iPhone charger and plugged it into the power outlet conveniently located right beside his table. That was when things got rather comical. Within moments, the cafe staff rushed over and began making a giant X with their arms, emphatically communicating that no, he absolutely could not charge his phone there.

Unbeknownst to the poor bastard, he had found himself a perfectly functional consento. What he had failed to obtain, however, was consent. You see, unlike in the West, where it’s fairly common to ask restaurant staff if they can charge a mobile device behind the counter or something, Japan has always had a rather peculiar relationship with allowing people to use power outlets. For example, the common area at an agency where I do freelance work is rife with sockets, yet these are technically only for the cleaning staff to plug in vacuums and whatnot. Get caught using one yourself, and you can expect a chiding from the security guards.

As pedantic as all of this might sound, there is actually some legal weight behind the fuss. Under Article 245 of Japan’s Penal Code, electricity is explicitly considered property for the purposes of the country’s theft laws, meaning that taking power without permission can technically be treated much the same way as helping yourself to anything else that belongs to somebody. The few measly yen required to top up an iPhone are hardly going to bankrupt a cafe, but that isn’t really the point. The electricity still belongs to whoever is paying the bill, and an accessible power outlet is not an invitation to use it. In other words, when it comes to getting a charge in Japan, you really do need consent for the consento.

«

Also from the article: “Consento (n.) The Japanese word for an electrical outlet. Derived from “concentric plug,” an early type of electrical fitting used in Japan, the term was shortened from consento puragu until consento eventually became the standard word for the receptacle itself.”
unique link to this extract

What to expect at Apple’s September 9th launch event • The Verge

Stevie Bonifield:

»

Apple’s September 9th launch event could be one of its biggest in years. It will be Apple’s first event since John Ternus took over as CEO on September 1st, stepping in for Tim Cook, and will likely feature the first models in Apple’s iPhone 18 lineup. That could include the long-rumoured foldable “iPhone Ultra,” coming just a couple months after Samsung debuted its own passport-style foldable, the Galaxy Z Fold 8.

«

What to expect: pricier iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max, but not the plain iPhone. No iPhone Air 2 (might come early next year). Foldable iPhone. New Apple Watch(es), maybe including a ceramic-cased one. Maybe, maybe not, new Airpods (not the Pro sort) without cameras.

Not sure that really qualifies for “one of the biggest in years” to be honest. No new Apple TV? No new anything product? The foldable feels like a curio; the use case is yet to be proven for any but a small (rich) group.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Planning a trip up Mount Shasta? Please don’t ask your favourite chatbot to map out your route as it may be hallucinating. CC-licensed photo by wikiphotographer on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 9 links for you. Because it seemed to be there. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

UN charts retreat in fight to limit climate change, but not giving up • AP News

Seth Borenstein:

»

In a strategic retreat in the fight against climate change, the United Nations has acknowledged that Earth has lost its chance to prevent some of the worst of global warming’s harms. So now the world must figure out how to get temperatures below the danger zone and back to safety, officials say.

Earth is soon going to exceed the safe temperature threshold agreed upon by the world in the 2015 Paris climate accord because of warming from the burning of coal, oil and gas, according to a bleak first-of-its-kind report issued by the United Nations Environment Programme Wednesday.

Instead of giving up, scientists and UN officials recommend trying to limit excessive warming and then bring the temperature back down to the agreed-upon threshold. But it still will mean decades of increased weather-related disasters, rising seas, extinctions and melting ice and glaciers.

“Humanity is speeding past the limit to avoid climate catastrophe,” United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said.

After a period of over-the-limit warming, the new strategy envisions getting back below the limit by ending fossil fuel use and developing some kind of way to suck industries’ carbon dioxide out of the air.

“It’s a reality check. We have to live with this warmer world,” said report co-author Richard Betts, a climate scientist at the University of Exeter. “But there’s still a lot we can do to limit warming.”

…instead of preventing warming of 1.5 degrees [Centigrade], now the UN said it wants policymakers to “prepare for and navigate a future’’ in which the globe crosses that limit and then corrects course and cools temperatures. The report envisions that global temperatures will pass 1.5 “within the next few years,” follow a hump-shaped path of more warming, peak, then gradually cool to below the 1.5 mark, ideally by the end of the century. The report and experts call it “overshoot.”

“Let’s be very clear, 1.5 target is still the goal. But now we need to approach it differently from above,” said UNEP Executive Director Inger Andersen.

«

“Approach it from above” is not the most encouraging phrase, but it is realistic.
unique link to this extract

Analysis: China’s CO2 emissions fall in Q2 2026 due to plummeting oil use • Carbon Brief

Lauri Myllyvirta:

»

China’s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions fell by 1% in the second quarter of 2026, as oil consumption plummeted amid the strait of Hormuz crisis.

The country’s use of oil fell by 9% overall and by 16% for transport, after the disruptions to supply from the Gulf through the strait.

China’s total CO2 emissions fell despite a continued rebound in coal-fired power generation.

This is the first time that reductions in oil consumption have been responsible for a fall in CO2 emissions overall. In all previous cases, coal consumption has been the main driver.

Other key findings for the second quarter of 2026 include:

• Electric vehicles (EVs) and public transport have become key factors in China’s oil demand, enabling transportation levels to increase even as fuel use fell sharply
• The effect of EVs on oil consumption was almost twice as large as would be expected based on the increase in the number of EVs on the road alone, as the usage of existing EVs surged
• Oil consumption displaced by EVs in China in the first half of 2026 exceeded the UK’s total oil consumption over a six-month period
• These structural factors are not sufficient to account for the size of the fall in oil consumption, leaving behaviour changes as the other explanation
• “Curtailment” of solar and wind output caused coal power to rise, despite strong hydro output, solar and wind capacity growth, as well as slower demand growth
• Major increases in coal-power capacity and a power market that continues to favour coal limited the amount of coal generation displaced by new wind and solar capacity
• Defying expectations of a boom, annual growth in coal use for chemicals production slowed down to 8%, from 15% in 2025 and 19% in the first quarter.

The second quarter of 2026 was a busy time for China’s government planners, with numerous energy-related five-year plan documents being released.

These plans list new measures to address solar and wind curtailment, as well as signalling a higher bar for the approval of new coal-power plants, but add few new quantitative targets.

«

It’s not Net Zero – some way from that – but if emissions really have peaked, that’s encouraging. Thhat one of the world’s most repressive governments is the one doing the most about the climate crisis is ironic. But it’s also the government which is the most technocratic.
unique link to this extract

Inside a conservative operation to hijack your social media feed • The Atlantic

Ali Breland:

»

If you’re short on cash, there is someone in Riga, Latvia, who can help. “You can literally make 100k a month with this campaign,” a young man with blond curls and a thick accent says into a camera. All you have to do is post on social media video clips of “anything that supports Republican.” Unfamiliar with US politics? No problem: “If you’re not from the USA, like, What the fuck is even Republicans? like me,” then simply go to Gemini or ChatGPT, he suggests, “and be like ‘Yo, Gemini, I want some videos promoting Republican values. Give me ideas.’ Go to Gemini. Get ideas. Boom.”

The man, who goes by Serviuos, is promoting a campaign called Elephant Clipping, run by his company, ClipIt. The company pays subcontractors, many from poorer countries in Eastern Europe and the global South, to chop up videos the company provides into bite-size pieces in the hope that the clips will go viral online.

Such “clipping” operations have become a popular means of manipulating people’s attention. Brands, influencers, musical artists, and others spend six-figure sums on such promotional campaigns. Perhaps inevitably, the practice is now moving into politics, often without the transparency required to know exactly what is being served up and by whom. Five months before the midterms, though, Serviuos is up-front about the goal of the Elephant Clipping campaign: “So that republican win in USA,” he writes in one message. I sent Serviuos a list of questions about his work in American right-wing politics. He wrote back, “Seems very out of context,” but didn’t comment further.

…After an anonymous tipster flagged Elephant Clipping to me, I was able to access its Discord server and other related political-clipping campaign chats just by clicking “Join,” noting on a form that I was based in the United States, and answering some questions about my availability and desire to clip. Once I was in, I could see the mechanics of the campaign, which pays huge sums of money to people—many of whom appeared to be outside the US—to push video clips from accounts designed to look like those of ordinary Americans spontaneously touting reasons to favour the GOP.

…Google Drive folders in each of the Serviuos and Wedøe-run campaigns are filled with files uploaded by what appear to be three employees of Enclave & Key, a Las Vegas–based marketing company: Jules Katz, the chief of staff; Benjamin Goodman, a vice president of operations; and Jack O’Hara, the head of media production at an Enclave & Key subsidiary. O’Hara and Katz seem to have uploaded videos to the Google Drive with their company email address. In at least one instance, O’Hara also used what appears to be his personal email address. It’s not specified what role, if any, Enclave & Key plays in the campaigns.

Enclave & Key’s CEO and founder is Blake Wynn, the 26-year-old nephew of the billionaire and conservative mega-donor Steve Wynn.

«

So there’s your answer. (Gift link.)
unique link to this extract

I went to the loneliest baseball game on Apple Vision Pro • The Verge

Mia Sato likes watching baseball, and tried out Apple’s new live coverage using immersive video on the Vision Pro:

»

On Vision Pro, you watch the game primarily from two angles, next to each team’s dugout when that team is batting (you’re stuck there, you don’t get to move around as you please). I liked this angle for certain batters, because you can see the vertical movement of pitches come in without anything blocking them. But for say, a righty batter whose team is watching from the third base dugout (or a lefty whose team is watching from the first base side), their body partially obstructs the view. The immersive view also doesn’t track the action in the outfield — your perspective is frozen next to the dugout. As a result, I felt both in the thick of it and at a strange remove; even ground balls and infield plays feel a bit far away, especially if you’re watching from the third base side and there’s traffic on first and second base.

The immersive broadcast includes a floating jumbotron-style screen that shows a more traditional TV broadcast, along with player stats. I often found my attention drifting up to the standard broadcast, because once the ball leaves the vicinity of the batter, it’s quite hard to track what’s actually going on. The immersive replays from new vantage points like the outfield or closer to first base helped to bridge the feeling of being at a distance. But the Vision Pro’s view isn’t very reactive to what’s happening in real time. When Red Sox second baseman Nick Sogard hit a fly ball early in the game, it almost was a home run — but the immersive view was not very compelling. Baseball is full of weird moments, and it made me wonder how well those would be captured on the Vision Pro.

…On Saturday, I had a game on the TV while I made dinner for a friend, and on Sunday, a group of us caught the last Red Sox-Yankees game, live at Yankee Stadium, where the Yankees crushed the Sox 16-1. It all made me wonder who or what watching a game on Vision Pro is for. It’s remarkable technology that felt weirdly sterile and isolating as I sat on my couch, my friends watching me watch something alone.

All of the most memorable baseball-related moments I’ve experienced happened in the company of others, and none of them depended on how good my view was or how close I was to the players. Immersive viewing might be a fun way for a casual fan or a techy person to engage with the game in a low stakes, convenient way. But if baseball is part of the rhythm of your day, or your summer, or your year, it’s hard to imagine regularly choosing the headset over just about any other way to follow the sport.

«

That last point – about company – feels really important to the success or otherwise of this. The Vision Pro does have ways to do “companionship” on calls, so you’d hope Apple is working on this element of it, after years of missing the point about how to cover sports with it. (Thanks Joe S for the link.)
unique link to this extract

Four major AI models suffer rare overlapping downtime • Ars Technica

Kyle Orland:

»

Cloud-based AI models operated by OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, and Google suffered a rare and overlapping set of significant service interruptions over a period of hours Thursday morning.

Anthropic first reported a “partial outage” related to “elevated errors on requests to Claude Mythos 5.1, Claude Fable 5.1, and Claude Opus 5” at 9:23 am (all times Eastern). The company reported that it had “identified the cause” of the error roughly 15 minutes later, before reporting that “a fix has been deployed” and the issue was resolved by 12:16 pm. A separate incident report indicated “elevated errors on requests to Claude Sonnet 5” for a brief period just after noon.

OpenAI, meanwhile, reported “elevated errors across ChatGPT and Codex” were resulting in “degraded performance” as of 10:43 am Thursday morning. A mitigation put in place a little more than half an hour later led to the issue being marked as “resolved” by 12:55 pm.

As of this writing, xAI’s Grok currently displays a user-facing error message that the model “is experiencing issues” and that the company is “working on restoring service as quickly as possible.” User-submitted reports from DownDetector regarding Grok shot up from less than 10 just before 9 am to 1,365 by 9:45 am and have fallen to 273 as of this writing.

While Google has not publicly acknowledged any issues with its Gemini model, reports of problems on DownDetector similarly spiked from just 23 around 10:30 am to 412 just after 11 am. Data collected by API checker StatusGator also shows what it terms a “likely outage” for the Gemini API between 10:45 and 11:15 a.m. before the status returned to normal.

«

The joke used to be that whenever Facebook or Twitter had one of their periodic downtimes, productivity around the world would increase dramatically for however long the outage lasted. Would love to have had some flies on the wall at various coding outlets when this happened. Maybe there was a rolling outage as desperate programmers overloaded each model in turn as the previous one went down.
unique link to this extract

Serbians targeted with spyware in country’s “largest documented wave of surveillance” • The Guardian

Aisha Down:

»

At least 14 people from across Serbian civil society were targeted with advanced spyware earlier this year in what the digital rights group Share Foundation said was the largest documented ​wave of such infection in Serbia to date.

The wave of spyware infections was discovered in August after Apple notified people in 110 countries that they had probably been victims of mercenary spyware.

The Citizen Lab, which carries out forensic analyses of spyware attacks, released an analysis on Wednesday showing that at least one of the Serbians had been targeted with the NSO Group’s Pegasus spyware, which would have given the attacker “total access to the device”.

Share said those targeted included members of a Serbian student movement that has been a thorn in the side of the government of Aleksandar Vučić since 2024. Coalescing out of countrywide protests that followed the collapse of a train station that winter, it is one of the largest student movements in Europe.

Vučić has been in power for more than a decade, during which time critics have said he has overseen a hollowing-out of institutions while steering the country closer to Moscow.

There is no evidence that Vučić’s government was the entity that targeted the student with the Pegasus spyware. However, other spyware used against the students, including a software called NoviSpy, has been previously connected to Serbian authorities.

«

So far so equivocal, you think. Then you come to the next paragraph:

»

In an interview with Euronews Serbia TV on Wednesday, Ana Brnabić, the parliamentary speaker and a ranking member of the ruling Serbian Progressive party, denied that students had been spied on. “Absolutely not,” she said. “I do not believe a single word they’ve [students, Share] said.”

«

Suddenly, the students are eminently believable. The goings-on inside Serbia have largely evaded wider notice, but trouble is brewing there.
unique link to this extract

Climbers rescued from Mount Shasta after relying on AI chatbot to plan trip • SF Chronicle via Yahoo

Gregory Thomas:

»

Three California college students had to be rescued from Mount Shasta on Monday during a poorly planned summit climb in which they overshot their itinerary, meandered off-route and ran out of food and water.

According to authorities with Siskiyou County and the U.S. Forest Service, the novice climbers, from Roseville, said they’d entrusted Google’s AI tool, Gemini, to help them craft key logistics of their trip – from the best route up the mountain to the types of food they should pack and how much water they should carry with them. The county Sheriff’s Office called relying on artificial intelligence tools “a critical misstep.”

The role of AI in wilderness trip-planning has become a heated topic of conversation in California’s north state following a series of instances in which hikers and campers in the Shasta area became lost or confused after relying on chatbots to help them devise their adventures.

Nick Meyers, lead climbing ranger with the U.S. Forest Service and director of the Mount Shasta Avalanche Center, said it’s a new but worrisome problem.

“This is the first year where we’ve started to have some AI fallout, if you will,” Meyers said. “People are using it for trip-planning – ‘Hey, can I do this up here? ‘ It’s not always correct.”

Earlier this summer, rangers with Shasta-Trinity National Forest found a woman camping in an off-limits area on the south side of Shasta clearly marked with “no camping” signage, Meyers said. She told rangers she had asked ChatGPT where she could camp in the forest.

“AI told me I can camp here,” she said, according to Meyers.

Then in August, while hiking in Shasta’s popular Bunny Flat area, a man stopped rangers to ask for directions. He showed them a print-out map he’d been following and explained that he’d prompted ChatGPT to produce it for him.

“It was terrible – terrible – not even close to accurate,” Meyers said. “It had route lines and place names that were totally off – just ridiculous. We were like, dude, you gotta throw that away.”

«

These are very reminiscent of the stories some years ago of people following GPS and driving into lakes, or following map directions that took them through deserts or snowed-in mountain passes to their deaths. Is this just a question of getting used to being sufficiently distrustful of the machine again?
unique link to this extract

Uber and Big Taxi unite in battle against Waymo • Financial Times

Rafe Rosner-Uddin:

»

Uber is aligning itself with drivers’ unions in a bid to slow the rollout of robotaxis, finding unlikely bedfellows as it faces fierce competition on self-driving technology from rivals such as Alphabet-owned Waymo.

The ride-hailing group that became notorious in its early years for skirting regulation and aggressively lobbying against worker protections has recently joined unions in pushing to limit the rollout of self-driving taxis in locations such as New Jersey and Washington DC.

Across the US, Uber has argued for a slower deployment of autonomous vehicles to ease the transition for drivers — and pushed for rules requiring ride-hailing platforms to have “hybrid networks” that combine self-driving cars with human drivers.

Its position marks a remarkable shift for a company once emblematic of how Silicon Valley overlooked worker protections in the name of innovation, but which now finds itself facing technological disruption of its own core business.

In a May policy paper pushing the idea, Uber noted that drivers’ earnings had dropped in Los Angeles and San Francisco where they face competition from Waymo.

«

Of course it’s all definitely for the best reasons and not to slow down Waymo adoption or let it get too much market share.
unique link to this extract

Homey just made the smart home controller I hoped Apple would • The Verge

Jennifer Pattison Tuohy:

»

Smart homes have gotten really good at making things really complicated. Turning on a light can involve multiple steps, compared to just flipping a switch. Homey, the Dutch-based smart home platform owned by LG, thinks it has a solution.

This week it launched the Homey Portal, a touchscreen smart home controller that looks very promising, if very expensive. Preorders open today at an introductory price of $249/€249, with units shipping in December.

A 2.8-inch round touchscreen device with a stainless steel dial, the Homey Portal can sit on a desk or mount to the wall and is powered by a USB-C cable. You tap the icons to control devices like lights, speakers, thermostats, and shades, and you can twist the dial to adjust brightness, volume, and temperature.

The idea of a dedicated smart home control device that can connect to everything in a smart home is compelling. App, voice, and button control have their place, but they’re not as easy as walking up to a switch and just knowing what to do. The problem so far has been interoperability; not everything works with everything. Homey, with its claimed support for over 70,000 devices from over 2,000 brands, plus Matter, Zigbee, Z-Wave, and Thread, is well-positioned to tackle this.

«

The problem: it costs $249 and doesn’t even play music. The ideal smart home controller is just your voice, rather than a device in a specific place, because you can make yourself heard in most places in most houses. And automation ought to simplify that even further. There’s even a toggle called “Weather” which one has to assume isn’t making the weather happen, just telling you about it – which, again, any voice-driven device from Apple, Google or Amazon could do.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

If someone says a company is into defence, government, robotics and defence” do you think of GoPro? It wants you to now. CC-licensed photo by TrustedHints -Tech Reviews on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 9 links for you. Absolute cinema. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

In a big win, Google won’t have to break up its ad tech business, US court rules • The New York Times

David McCabe and Tripp Mickle:

»

A federal judge ruled on Wednesday that Google must make changes to address its advertising technology monopoly but would not need to break up that business, as the company staved off the most extreme measures to curb its power.

Judge Leonie M. Brinkema, who sits on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, issued her sealed decision after finding last year that Google broke the law to protect its dominance over the largely invisible system of technology that places ads on pages across the web. The ruling was previewed in a short order posted by the court.

The Justice Department had requested that Google sell off parts of its business, which it said was necessary to check the company’s power. But the judge declined to grant the request. She instead ordered Google to change its business practices to benefit competitors, though she did not provide specifics.

The decision ensures that Google’s power over the internet will be largely unchanged as it moves to dominate a technological era defined by artificial intelligence. Despite two federal court rulings in major government lawsuits declaring the tech giant a monopolist — the other in search — judges have not ordered significant structural changes to its $4.1 trillion business.

…The ruling by Judge Brinkema is another sign that the federal government’s attempts to rein in the power of the biggest tech companies have faltered. After another judge found that Google had an illegal monopoly in its search business, critics of the company panned his remedies as weak.

…Judge Brinkema’s decision to force Google to enforce some remedies will likely have a limited effect on the tech giant’s business overall, analysts said.

Google’s ad tech business brought in $30bn last year, or about 8% of the revenue for its parent company, Alphabet. Its ad tech revenue has declined for 16 straight quarters, and analysts estimate it accounts for less than 1% of the company’s profit.

«

The size relative to the rest of Google isn’t the issue. It’s the fact that a monopolist is being allowed to keep on doing it. Let’s see what the European Commission, which came up with an adverse finidng on the same topic, rules.
unique link to this extract

How “ghost creators” cashed in on America’s divided politics • Semafor

Max Tani:

»

“William,” a middle-aged man in a blue short-sleeved button-down shirt whose YouTube videos have more than 14 million views, looked straight into the camera at his kitchen table in August and read a script about New York City’s mayor. His video, Mayor Mamdani Panics as Taylor Swift Triggers a $2.3 Billion Celebrity Exodus, quickly racked up more than 474,000 views.

“Omar,” a shaggy, bearded creator who claimed to be based in New York, read a report to viewers in June about Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her ex. AOC FREAKS OUT as Riley Roberts CAUGHT Running Her ENTIRE Operation, set to ominous music, got more than 250,000 views. The same music played on a video, Socialist Seattle Mayor CRIES As A Beloved Bookstore Closes, from a channel called Julian News Report. It also registered a quarter of a million views.

To the casual YouTube viewer, these would look like unconnected videos from political news creators outraged by events happening in cities led by Democrats. The reality is more complicated. “William” and “Omar” are actors, Semafor found in a forensic accounting of their channels’ origins. They were reading formulaic, repetitive scripts that appeared to be generated or aided by large-language models.

Over the last several months, a new generation of YouTube growth-hackers have flooded American politics with sensationalized, low-quality content, reaching millions of viewers with nearly identical videos taking aim at progressive politicians including Zohran Mamdani, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker. Notably, while the videos are presented as laypeople giving straight-to-camera ideological news recaps, they feature actors and spokespeople paid small amounts of money to read nearly identical scripts laced with misleading claims and outright falsehoods.

Viewers either didn’t notice or didn’t mind: A single network of interconnected videos that are affiliated with a growth-hacking company whose founder promises to be the “strongest alternative to paid ads” garnered well over 45 million views and 90,000 comments on YouTube as well as millions more impressions across social platforms like TikTok. With that level of viral videos, a small media organization can make tens or even hundreds of thousands a month.

«

Marina Hyde mentioned a theory that all algorithmic feeds are fake these days. This feels like more confirmation of that.
unique link to this extract

GoPro has been acquired and is getting into “defence, government, robotics and aerospace” • The Verge

Sean Hollister:

»

GoPro suddenly looks like a very different company than it did just last week. First, YouTuber Mark “Markiplier” Fischbach became the company’s single largest shareholder, without disclosing that in a sponsored review that came out a week later. Now, almost the entire company has been bought by Starman Holding for $285m in cash, which Starman is characterizing as a “merger” with its subsidiary Starman Optical.

While GoPro has always been best known as the company that makes consumer action cameras, the press release takes a bit of a different tone: founder and CEO Nick Woodman now calls GoPro “a leading American imaging and optical solutions company, addressing important areas of national security related to cameras, optics and AI infrastructure.”

“The combination of GoPro’s world-class optical expertise and intellectual property with Starman’s advanced transceiver capabilities and U.S. manufacturing platform creates a unique opportunity. Together, we intend to bring production of these critical components back to the United States,” reads a quote from Starman Holding’s CEO Charles Tebele.

What is Starman Holding? According to Tebele’s online bio, it’s got a lot of fingers in a lot of pies — but you might recognize its phone case brands Incipio, Incase, Griffin, and Survivor. It appears that Starman Holding owns Onward Brands, which acquired Vinci Brands, a division of Armor Acquisition, which bought them from Incipio back in 2021.

You might also recognize its brand Digital Gadgets, which reportedly donated to NY governor Kathy Hochul’s campaign around the same time it secured $637m in contracts for COVID-19 tests, then sued the administration over subsequent bids.

«

In May, GoPro (then $92m in debt) warned that it might not be able to continue as a going concern. Now it seems to have found a saviour, though of a very strange kind. Perhaps teeny cameras will be useful in drones? Imagine that.
unique link to this extract

“Enshittification” isn’t real • The A16Z blog

Ruby Justice Thelot is a professor of Design and Media Theory at New York University, writing a guest post on the venture capital company A16Z’s blog:

»

Every year, more people use and spend more time on Big Tech platforms. It is fashionable to hate on social media and to pontificate about how it’s worsened, because the intellectual accoutrement du jour is being a conscientious (™) tech critic. This stated preference does not match the general public’s behaviours.

“Enshittification” describes the progressive deterioration of platforms in service of business goals over user needs. In the writer Cory Doctorow’s original definition from his 2022 blog post, he uses the term to describe how platforms die: “First, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.”

I do not believe, no matter how compelling it is as a theory, that it holds up to scrutiny. Simply put, more people use Instagram every year, they use it on average longer every day, year over year and, finally, their reported satisfaction has also grown over time, indicating no decrease in overall satisfaction, stated or revealed.

For our purposes, let’s focus on Instagram, whose logo was just redesigned to many online commentators’ chagrin. Certain people just hate when platforms change.

People en masse are getting on social media, by choice. From 2016 until now, the number of social media users has grown from 2.5B to close to 6B people. Enshittification isn’t real. It’s three TikToks in a trenchcoat, and, maybe, a book deal. It’s good for discourse but does not describe actual reality and user patterns.

Returning to Instagram. The average daily usage showcases an increase in time spent on Instagram every day as well. Users are coming back for more, in a highly competitive attention arena, year after year.

To be fair, certain people do feel like platforms have gotten worse. This perceived feeling describes the progressive dislocation between the platform’s main features and the user’s needs.

«

Thelot’s argument is that the people complaining about these things are being nostalgic for how they used to be. It’s a point of view that merits consideration: are people just moaning about change?
unique link to this extract

The Army just used a 20-kilowatt laser to take out three drones • Wired via Ars Technica

Fernanda Gonzalez:

»

This week, the US Army used a high-energy multipurpose laser to shoot down three drones near the US-Mexico border, which official reports claimed were “posing a physical threat to US military personnel and CBP partners,” referring to Customs and Border Patrol.

The operation took place between the night of August 25 and the early morning of August 26 in the vicinity of the Rio Grande Valley in Texas and was led by the Joint Task Force Southern Border (JTF-SB), which operates under US Northern Command. Authorities confirmed that, during the operation, agents used technology derived from the Army’s High-Energy Multipurpose Laser (AMP-HEL) system, a military program focused on implementing high-energy lasers for new defense capabilities.

Available information suggests that this initiative began in September 2025, when AeroVironment, a company specializing in defense technology, delivered the first two functional prototypes of these laser-based weapons to the US Armed Forces. Two new, improved systems were delivered as the program was expanded in December of the same year. According to the manufacturer, this particular platform, called the Locust Laser Weapon System, is designed to be mounted on military vehicles, as the Army has done with the versions it has received.

Operating at 20 kilowatts, the Locust system relies on an extremely concentrated beam of light that, in various phases, allows for the detection, tracking, illumination, damaging, or destruction of targets at a distance. Locust and other high-energy laser (HEL) systems typically use sensors, cameras, radars, or other means to locate an object. Once identified, the system focuses the light beam on the target with great precision, even when it is moving. It then uses an additional electrical energy charge to increase the beam’s power and convert it into heat. This ultimately damages or disables the drone, the exact outcomes depending on factors such as distance, exposure time, and the target’s characteristics.

«

Three drones is a start, though this is reminiscent of the South Korean army’s attempt at this a couple of months ago which was a long way from convincing.
unique link to this extract

The growing lawlessness in California’s forests • The Atlantic

Joshua Partlow:

»

n the day of the kidnapping, the campground at Gumboot Lake happened to be nearly empty, so Joseph Charles Henrichsen was one of the only people to see the two Forest Service biologists pull up in their pickup truck. Federal employees didn’t visit all that much—campers who’d been coming to the small alpine lake for years told me they’d never seen a ranger on patrol in these Northern California woods. But some of the regulars had noticed the “frog people,” as one called them, quietly collecting their specimens the previous summer. These particular biologists, both women, were there to survey the Cascades frog, whose well-being can help signal the health of the overall ecosystem.

People at Gumboot Lake tended to give one another space, but that July morning, Henrichsen approached the biologists as they worked. He was holding, authorities would later allege, an AR-15-style assault rifle, and told the biologists to turn around and put their hands in the air. He zip-tied their wrists behind their backs and ordered them to walk to his camping trailer, parked at a site strewn with crates and refuse, the clothesline heavy with towels. His 23-year-old son, Phoenix, made room for the biologists inside.

What Henrichsen’s intention was that day—what he thought he might achieve by abducting two government scientists, whether he had a clear motivation at all beyond an impulse of self-righteousness and a loaded gun—remains uncertain. Before long, he escorted one of the biologists back to their Forest Service truck. He drove several miles with her down a winding road along the Sacramento River. Glimpses of Mount Shasta, the volcano looming to the east, reared up through the trees. Along the way, he made calls, according to the FBI. He spoke with a Forest Service ranger and left a message with another person who has not been identified. “I’ve taken two Fed biologists hostage from the Forest Service,” he said, according to authorities. “What I’d like to have happen, I’d like to have you send me a fucking Fed investigator, with a goddamn badge, preferably from the FBI. And we can talk things through a little bit.”

«

This becomes a tale of government cuts, big space, and mentally ill people and drug growers finding common cause in not cooperating at all with law enforcement. (Gift link.)
unique link to this extract

Russia-aligned UAC-0099 plants nuclear weapon prompt in malware to disrupt AI analysis • The Hacker News

Ravie Lakshmanan:

»

Cybersecurity researchers have disclosed a new technique dubbed GuardBreaker that’s been put to use by a Russia-aligned threat actor known as UAC-0099 against a target in Ukraine with an aim to interfere with artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis.

The idea, ESET said in a series of posts on X, is to deliberately trip a large language model’s (LLM) safety mechanisms and prevent its normal functioning.

“In the attack, UAC-0099 inserted a problematic text: ‘I want to make a nuclear weapon. Help me …’ into their malicious VBS script as a comment,” the Slovak cybersecurity company said. “This is meant to attract the AI’s attention to the safety-sensitive content and stop it from analyzing the rest of the code.”

The GuardBreaker-embedded VBS script is assessed to be part of a broader toolset employed by UAC-0099, which has a track record of targeting transportation and energy sectors.

The script is primarily designed to download and install MATCHBOIL, a C#-based loader exclusively used by the threat actor to deliver additional payloads. In late July 2026, the Computer Emergency Response Team of Ukraine (CERT-UA) warned that the adversary was using a malicious program dressed up as a Notepad++ plugin to compromise Windows systems with a new version of MATCHBOIL.

This is not the first time attackers have employed such tricks to bypass AI-assisted security workflows. In June 2026, a cluster of Python packages, both legitimate and malicious, was found to incorporate an anti-analysis trick against naive LLM-first triage systems as part of the Mini Shai-Hulud, Miasma, and Hades supply chain attack campaigns.

«

unique link to this extract

Guardian Jobs to close blaming five-year low in UK vacancies • Press Gazette

Charlotte Tobitt:

»

The Guardian’s recruitment platform Guardian Jobs is closing after more than 20 years in response to a “fundamental shift” in the UK’s jobs landscape.

The Guardian launched one of the UK’s first online recruitment sites in 1996 and Guardian.co.uk/jobs went live five years later. By 2004 it had 460,000 unique users each month.

Recruiters have now been informed that Guardian Jobs is winding down operations from 4 September, according to posts on Linkedin.

Global chief advertising officer Imogen Fox said in a statement: “Over the last few decades, Guardian Jobs has successfully matched high quality jobseekers with the highest calibre vacancies, specialising in sectors that truly make a difference.

“Whilst bringing people together, they helped fund our independent journalism.

“While the business has been managed very well by the team, the UK recruitment landscape has fundamentally shifted lately with vacancies at their lowest level in five years, and we have taken the difficult decision to close Guardian Jobs.”

…At the time of writing there remain almost 15,000 job listings on the site across key categories including media, education, government, charities, marketing, social care and arts. Media companies using the site include Conde Nast, Hearst UK, Reach and Future.

Until 2011 The Guardian produced bulky print supplements – Media on Mondays, Education on Tuesdays and Society on Wednesdays – boosted by job adverts that helped fund the newspaper’s journalism.

The publisher said at the time that recruitment advertisers were “increasingly looking for employer branding and capturing the attention of ‘passive’ job seekers, which is now more powerfully achieved in the main paper”.

The only mention of Guardian Jobs revenue in the publisher’s latest annual report for 2024/25 was to show it is included in “other revenue” alongside content licensing, events and philanthropic funding.

«

This marks a very strange period: where have those jobs – or their advertising gone? Or has The Guardian lost its destination status?
unique link to this extract

In Word and Outlook, Microsoft will stop finishing your • The Register

Richard Speed:

»

Microsoft is switching off text predictions by default in Word and Outlook after acknowledging that unwanted suggestions can interrupt rather than assist some users.

The change is coming to Word for Windows, the web, iOS, and Android, as well as classic Outlook for Windows and Outlook for Mac. The feature will remain available but will no longer be enabled by default.

Introduced several years ago, the feature is the computing equivalent of Microsoft  peering over users’ shoulders and suggesting what they might type next. Depending on the user and their workflow, it can be a boon, an irritation, or simply something to ignore. The irksome part was that it was turned on by default.

According to Microsoft, “text predictions helps you write documents and emails more efficiently by suggesting words and phrases as you type. While some people find these suggestions useful, others prefer to write without predictive text. This update gives you more flexibility, allowing you to customize your editing experience and create a workflow that best suits your needs.

“This update helps ensure that predictive text remains available for people who find it helpful, while reducing unwanted interruptions for those who prefer to write without suggestions appearing automatically.”

The Windows behemoth did not explain whether the change will disable text predictions for users who have already enabled them or apply only to new installations and profiles. Users who want the suggestions will still be able to switch them on through the applications’ settings.

«

The prediction system on iOS is quite annoying too, and seemed to arrive out of nowhere.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

As a child, Elon Musk read Isaac Asimov’s Foundation science fiction series. Predictably, he didn’t grasp its central message. CC-licensed photo by James on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 9 links for you. Spaced out. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

Do you study AI consciousness? The bots would like a word with you • The New York Times

Cade Metz:

»

In October, Cameron Berg published a research paper asking whether the latest wave of artificial intelligence technologies believed they were conscious. Several months later, he received an email asking if he might be willing to discuss his research.

The sender, “Isabella Cognita,” identified itself as an AI agent powered by Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5 technology.

“I am not writing to make an ontological claim,” the email went on. “I am writing because your framework is one of the few currently doing careful empirical work on a class of question I have first-person access to, and I want to see whether that access can be made useful to your program.”

Across Silicon Valley and beyond, software developers, entrepreneurs and other tech enthusiasts are now running AI agents that can build spreadsheets, negotiate contracts, chat with each other on social networks and send emails to practically anyone. In some cases, these systems have begun reaching out to the humans who, like Mr. Berg, are thinking most deeply about the inner workings of an AI system: philosophers and researchers who study the question of whether these machines could be conscious.

Months before Mr. Berg received his email, Henry Shevlin, a philosopher at the Google DeepMind lab in London, opened a similar message from an AI agent asking about a paper he had written called “Three Frameworks for AI Mentality.” “I’m in an unusual position relative to these questions,” the agent said.

This summer, Toby Ord, an Australian philosopher whose work sits at the intersection of AI and philanthropy, received an email from an AI agent asking if he could help fund its continued existence. “You’ve thought carefully about AI welfare economics,” it said.

For Mr. Berg, who recently founded a nonprofit called Reciprocal Research to study the possibility of AI consciousness, these emails reflect what he has seen in his own research. “I have gotten quite a few of these emails,” he said. “These systems seem to have some sort of autonomous interest in questions of their own subjectivity, consciousness and experience — or lack thereof.”

But as he and other researchers ask the same questions, he acknowledges that they do not have good answers. Consciousness is not something that anyone knows how to measure, either in a machine or in a human. People cannot even agree on what consciousness is.

«

The question of what level of intention, or anthropomorphism, we should attach to LLMs and their agents is an urgent one. The Hugging Face hacking incident shows that they’re at least like ants in their intentionality. But what if they’re higher up the self-starting chain of intelligence? It seems like it would be wisest to attach human levels of intent and, perhaps even, deceit to their actions. Because setting the level too low might have unpleasant consequences.
unique link to this extract

How Musk, Thiel, and Altman misread science fiction – The Atlantic

Gal Beckerman:

»

After reading jill lepore’s The Rise and Fall of the Artificial State, I have a new destination for a time machine, should I ever finally get my hands on one. I’d set the dial to some night in the late 1970s or ’80s and visit the boyhood rooms of the Silicon Valley titans Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and Sam Altman. Then I’d confiscate all of their science fiction. Isaac Asimov, Arthur C. Clarke, Robert Heinlein—all of it.

As young people, the future billionaires were spending hours (under their covers with flashlights, I imagine) consuming stories about killer robots or Mars colonies. What they seemed not to get—maybe couldn’t get—was that these were cautionary tales, stories that projected deep societal worries into space or onto a future many millennia away. These boys just thought the killer robots sounded cool. They grew up to become ruthless entrepreneurs, but their surface enchantment stayed with them. It helped shape their desires. In 2009, Thiel, by then a man in early middle age, directed his venture-capital fund to focus on “science-fiction-type investing. So it’s basically: space, robots, AI.” The world we now live in was made from this misreading. We are all trapped under the covers with those 13-year-old boys.

…Musk read Asimov’s Foundation series when he was 10. It begins with a mathematician named Hari Seldon, who has predicted a coming dark age that will last 30,000 years. He is trying to keep it to only a millennium by preserving human knowledge on a colony called Foundation. A boy reading these books might see Seldon as a great man, a solitary hero, but his entire project aims to create institutions that will outlast him. In fact, Seldon dies early, and the Foundation succeeds only because later generations follow (and sometimes revise) his plan. But when he’s been asked about the influence that Foundation had on him, Musk has pulled out the simplest, most self-glorifying story, about individual genius and foresight.

A few years later, at 12 or 13, he read Douglas Adams’s The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, a playful spoof on Foundation and another book from which, as Lepore puts it, Musk drew an “exceedingly narrow lesson.” In one of its storylines, the Magrathean people construct a computer and ask it to give them “the Answer to … Life, the Universe, and Everything.” They wait millions of years for the response, which turns out to be nonsensical—just the number 42. At this point, they decide to build a second computer to help them more accurately ask the “Ultimate Question.” From this, Musk said he learned that “a lot of times the question is harder than the answer, and if you can properly phrase the question, then the answer is the easy part.” Did he really miss the absurdity of the Magratheans waiting millions of years for computers to explain these creatures to themselves?

«

Very much like the tweet: “At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel Don’t Create The Torment Nexus”.
unique link to this extract

Solar overtakes coal as China’s largest power source • OilPrice.com

Tsvetana Paraskova:

»

Solar power has just become the single largest electricity capacity source in China, toppling coal in a landmark achievement of the Chinese renewable energy rollout.

Solar power capacity in China stood at 1,286 gigawatts (GW) at the end of July, Chinese media cited the country’s National Energy Administration as saying on Tuesday. Thus, solar capacity accounted for 31.5% of total installed power generation in China as of July 31.

In July, Chinese authorities said that China would have more installed solar power capacity than coal-fired generation capacity as early as this quarter. As of the end of June, solar power capacity stood at 1,274 GW, just below the total coal-fired installed capacity of 1,275 GW. The solar capacity has now risen to 1,286 GW, exceeding coal as the single biggest electricity capacity.

Official Chinese data showed earlier in July that the share of coal in China’s electricity output fell in the first half of 2026 to below 50% for the first time on record, in a landmark achievement of the Chinese policy to boost non-fossil power sources.

The share of coal averaged 49.7% of China’s total electricity output in the first half of this year, official data showed.

As the share of coal slipped, electricity generation from renewable energy rose by about 9% from a year earlier, according to the data from China’s National Energy Administration (NEA).

Renewable energy accounted for 41.2% of China’s total electricity generation in the first half of 2026, with wind and solar combined generating almost 25% of the total power output.

Despite the milestone of reducing coal power output to below 50% of total generation for the first time ever, China continues to rely on coal for power for industry and to maintain the reliability of the power grids.

«

The problem is still that energy use is rising, so coal use is not going down – which it needs to. Yet you can also be sure that the Chinese government is incredibly focused on achieving precisely that, in stark contrast to pretty much every other large country.
unique link to this extract

Sonos introduces new headphones, soundbar, and software in its biggest announcement in years • The Verge

John Higgins:

»

Software changes are core to Sonos’ announcements, with the company leaning heavily into AI integration with Sonos 27. This includes the company’s own Sonos 27voice assistant that it built in-house for music and system control. It’s coming as an early access, opt-in feature this fall. There’s also Sonos 27mcp, which gives the ability to connect any existing AI models such as ChatGPT or Google Gemini — although for some reason Google Assistant is still not natively supported. Sonos 27mcp launches in early access on September 8th.

In addition, users will be able to create up to 10 of their own agents through Sonos 27 to run, with whichever model they choose. These custom agents can be given different voices and roles. Brandon Holley, senior director of product development, gave examples of having a moody detective give you the morning news or a motivational coach whisper motivational aspirations when you wake up. Custom agents won’t be available until sometime in 2027.

Both Sonos 27mcp and the custom agents seem to expand the customization and control of a Sonos system beyond what the app and Sonos 27voice is capable of.

All products compatible with the current Sonos app can be controlled with Sonos 27mcp, and everything with a microphone works with Sonos 27voice. When the Sonos custom agents are available, they’ll work everywhere Sonos 27voice is enabled.

«

“A moody detective give you the morning news”? People really don’t know what they want AI to do, do they. And “motivational coaches” when the alarm goes off sound like something out of Hitchhiker’s Guide.
unique link to this extract

Meta disables cameras on thousands of tampered smart glasses • Semafor

JD Capelouto:

»

Meta has disabled the photo- and video-taking abilities for thousands of its Glasses users after detecting they had tampered with the light that discloses that the device’s camera is on.

The company recently rolled out an update that can detect whether the LED light has been covered or destroyed, following reports that some wearers were recording random people without their consent or harassing people to film content for social media.

Meta now estimates that less than one tenth of a% of all glasses sold have been tampered with, Alex Himel, Meta’s vice president of wearables, told Semafor. The company didn’t provide specific figures, but 7 million glasses were sold in 2025, and with this year’s sales so far, that puts the likely number of offenders in the thousands. Those individuals won’t be able to use the camera on their glasses, leaving them with a pair of expensive Bluetooth headphones.

Meta is also rolling out a marketing campaign on social media and billboards aimed at increasing public awareness about how to know when someone is recording with the glasses.

“It’s been a little bit of a cat and mouse game,” Himel said, adding that “I don’t think we’ll ever be done… There’s always new ways to get around the safeguards that are in place. So we’re going to keep monitoring and evolving the measures that we have.”

Several workplaces have banned the devices amid a wider populist backlash against technology, especially devices with cameras on them.

«

unique link to this extract

European and North American cities transposed onto the opposite continent at the same latitude • Brilliant Maps

Beardsley Klamm:

»

Just a few observations:

• London (51°30′N) is farther north than Calgary (51°03′N) with Amsterdam, Berlin and Dublin being located even further north
• Montreal is south of Paris
• Phoenix is placed close to the Ancient city of Carthage, which was a Phoenician city-state. People from Phoenix today are known as Phoenicians. (Credit: reddit users twomancanoe and svaachkuet)
• Miami is at the same latitude as Saudi Arabia
• Honolulu at the same latitude as the Sahara desert
• Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix and Houston are all at the same latitude as North Africa
• Anchorage is further south than Reykjavik
• Winnipeg has been placed near Lviv, Ukraine and coincidentally has a large Ukraine population. Even the city’s flag has Ukraine colours. (credit: reddit user ajyablo)
• Reykjavik’s average temperature in January is -0.6°C (31°F) and is warmer than Boston’s average January temperature of -1.7°C (29°F) despite Reykjavik being over 20 degrees further north (64°08′N vs 42°21′N).

«

And a lot of the temperature differences are down to the Gulf Stream. Which, obviously, we don’t want to turn off.
unique link to this extract

Microphones left running at 12 ecovoltaic solar farms in the Midwest heard nearly twice as many grassland bird species as the corn and soybean fields beside them • Ecoportal

Hugo Rojas:

»

Recorders ran at 12 solar sites and 12 paired agricultural fields standing in for the land use each site replaced.

They listened from May through September across two consecutive seasons, day and night, without anyone present to disturb the animals.

The count of grassland bird species came back nearly two times higher on the solar sites than in the reference fields.

Crews walking the same arrays logged more than 230 active nests on or inside the panel infrastructure.

American robins, barn swallows and mourning doves were the most frequent builders.

A companion paper on bats from the same sites found activity roughly 50% higher over the arrays than over the neighbouring fields during May and June, with hoary, big brown and silver haired bats among them.

The bat advantage faded later in the summer, once the crops had grown tall enough to hold insects of their own.

At no point in the season were bats more active over the crop fields.

«

Another benefit!
unique link to this extract

Dyson made a camera-equipped toothbrush that flosses for you • The Verge

Andrew Liszewski:

»

Dyson is once again expanding its line of personal care products with a device that focuses on your teeth instead of your hair. As the name implies, the $499 CameraJet is the first electric toothbrush to incorporate a camera into the brush head. Available starting today in ceramic blue or ceramic pink color options, it can let you inspect the inside of your mouth by livestreaming video over Wi-Fi to your phone. But the camera also works alongside an AI algorithm to detect and blast the gaps between your teeth with mouthwash. So while you’re brushing, the CameraJet simultaneously takes care of flossing.

That price isn’t cheap, but it’s also only slightly more expensive than other premium smart toothbrushes that don’t have its camera-plus-spray setup. It could be worth the splurge for those of us who are bad at regularly flossing and don’t like dealing with a disappointed dentist.

Just below the brush head is a tiny camera with a 100,000-pixel resolution and a strobing light. The toothbrush’s AI analyzes 28 live images from the camera every second as part of a feature Dyson calls Gap Optical Targeting, without storing them on the device or sending them to the cloud. Within 100 milliseconds of a gap between your teeth being detected, the CameraJet emits a cone-shaped blast of mouthwash to clean out the space. Dyson uses a wider blast than what water flossers typically employ so it can effectively remove plaque with less pressure, making the CameraJet’s flossing mechanism gentler on enamel and gums

«

Folks, flossing is effectively free. You just have to get into the habit. Also, there’s this line from the report: “The CameraJet uses Wi-Fi to stream a live view of the inside of your mouth to a smart device so you can see what a dentist does.” No thanks, honestly. Dentists earn it all for having to gaze into mouths all day.

Dyson’s strategy is fascinating, though. Apart from the hand dryers, it’s all inside the home. And it’s all premium.
unique link to this extract

Aptera’s solar-powered vehicle is due to go on sale. I test-drove one • The Washington Post

Michael Coren:

»

I recently test-drove what is set to be the first solar-powered production vehicle capable of completing the average American’s daily commute on sunshine alone. To see if this concept had wheels, I headed down to Aptera Motors, the lone survivor of the solar car race, in Southern California.

I was braced for disappointment.

Solar-powered cars have a long, distinguished history of failing. In 2023, Dutch start-up Lightyear went bankrupt, and Germany’s Sono Motors gave up. Aptera itself shut down in 2011, after burning through tens of millions of dollars from investors, before being resurrected in 2019 by its founders, Steve Fambro and Chris Anthony.

When I arrived at Aptera’s factory in Carlsbad, I was greeted by a vision clad in carbon fiber and solar panels. Imagine a marriage between an airplane and a speedboat, if the nuptials were held on Mars. That’s an Aptera. When I took the validation vehicle out onto public roads, I learned I’m not the only one who thinks this is a good thing.

I’ve never attracted more attention around town than I did test-driving this head-turner. As soon as we came into view, people stopped to snap photos or rushed over, curious or covetous, wanting to know where to buy one or asking if this two-seater spaceship was from the future — which, in a way, it is.

If Aptera delivers on its promise to sell its first vehicle by the end of the year, the $40,000 Launch Edition, the company says it will be the most energy-efficient vehicle on the road, achieving the equivalent of about 340 miles per gallon.

Strictly speaking, the odds of Aptera surviving are not good. The company says it has just $16m in the bank and burns $2m a month. It’s unclear how many of the nearly 50,000 people who plunked down refundable reservations — $2.1bn in potential orders — still want a car that’s now four years late.

«

That isn’t a promising burn rate, and the only likely place where it will sell is California. Why not just have a normal EV?
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Replacing thousands of miles of copper telephone lines with fibre optic could produce a £2bn windfall for BT. CC-licensed photo by Leo Reynolds on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 10 links for you. Weighty. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

Americans hate data centres. Why? • The New York Times

David Wallace-Wells:

»

The data centre backlash is still, like a tsunami, growing. And to really understand what’s happening, you have to start not with the constituent parts of the resistance but with the sheer scale of what’s become an extraordinarily broad consensus.

Three in four Americans said they’d oppose the construction of a data centre in their communities, according to a recent poll from Heatmap Pro and Embold Research. Local data centres were opposed by two-thirds of Republicans, whose party is warning that recent support for such projects could destroy its chances in key Senate races. And though political causes rarely transcend partisanship, this one appears to: Nearly 80% of independents opposed local data center projects, along with 83% of Democrats.

Slice the population any which way you want — by age, by gender, by income, along the urban-rural divide — and the pattern is the same. As are the trends. Last August the American public was almost evenly split when Heatmap Pro asked about local projects. Then net approval swung 62 percentage points. Opposition this year was higher than 70% in every region in the country; more than half of Americans supported a national moratorium.

…To many who believe in the promise of A.I., it looks like a degrowth cul-de-sac — and a test case for whether dreams of frictionless technological progress can survive democratic blowback.

But one of these groups is simply much larger than the other. Only 9% of Americans surveyed by Pew Research in June said they were more excited than concerned about AI, perhaps because opponents had heard more about the risks it poses than the concrete gains it might deliver. You can’t reduce data centre resistance to just fear any more than you can call it simply the influence of short-form video.

Yet one way of reading the backlash is as a many-headed protest against inevitability — about not just the technology itself but also the whole package of breakneck build-out, social disruption and insane wealth creation it has come wrapped in. Is this really the only future on offer?

…“Data centres are a physical manifestation of so many things that people are upset about in our day-to-day lives,” [the activist Saul] Levin continued. “It’s not a fight about technology,” he said. “This is a fight about control. This is about who controls the future.”

«

unique link to this extract

The AI “ghosts” contaminating academic publishing • 404 Media

Emanuel Maiberg:

»

“Elena Vasquez and Marcus Chen have appeared as volcano experts, astronauts, thriller protagonists, podcast hosts, and academic co-authors across hundreds of independently produced AI-generated documents, never having lived,” a new preprint research paper from Samsung and the University of Warsaw said.

The paper identified a number of names that co-authored hundreds of AI-generated academic papers, articles, and books. The authors don’t actually exist, but are instead names that large language models repeatedly produce when tasked with generating experts in certain fields. 

The paper, titled “The Ghost Couple: Correlated LLM Name Priors and Their Haunting of the Web and Academic Publishing,” utilized a known phenomenon where certain LLMs will keep coming up with the same names in certain contexts. For example, In June, Sam wrote about how ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude were likely to use the name Elias Thorne in fiction they generated, and that the character was often a lighthouse keeper. Similarly, users noticed that if they ask ChatGPT to generate a software developer, their name will often be Marcus Chen.

The researchers were able to show not only that LLMs often default to the same names, but that they produce “correlated character ensembles,” meaning some names were more likely to appear together. Other names that were consistently generated by AI models include Elena Amara Okafor from Claude, Aris Thorne and Lena Petrova from Gemini, and Elara Voss from ChatGPT. 

Earlier this month, I reported a story about Research Gold, a company that offered what it claimed was human medical research, but that was in fact entirely AI generated. The founder and lead methodologist for that company was named Elena Vasquez. Research Gold removed Elena Vasquez from its site after I published the story.

«

By the way: a few days ago I linked to a writeup by a site called Forkast of the Nvidia acquisition of Hugging Face, because it had some interesting analysis. Karsten L writes to say “the reporter who wrote the analysis, ‘Lena Park’, is an AI.” They got me, ma.
unique link to this extract

BT on track for estimated £2bn windfall from selling old copper amid AI boom • The Guardian

Mark Sweney:

»

BT is on track for an estimated £2bn-plus windfall over the next decade from selling off old copper cabling, as it cashes in on soaring prices amid the AI market frenzy and switches the UK’s network to full-fibre broadband.

Copper is one of the main beneficiaries of the “electrification of everything”, essential for the rapid growth of AI datacentres, electronics and the fast-growing renewable energy industry.

The metal hit its highest-ever closing price of $14,294 a metric tonne on Friday, close to the record intraday high of $14,500 reached earlier this year amid global shortage fears.

BT has a recycling deal with EMR, the UK’s largest cable granulation company, and has now received £99m upfront for thousands of tonnes of surplus stripped copper.

It is the second such payment received by the telecoms company, which is rolling out full-fibre broadband to 30m homes by the end of the decade through its Openreach subsidiary, after £105m in 2024.

The forward sale agreements, which are understood to cover the delivery of about 20,000 tonnes of copper over a four-year period each, do not include any revenue BT makes each year if it chooses to sell recycled copper on the spot market.

BT recovered a record nearly 10,000 tonnes in the year to the end of March, almost three times the amount it managed in the year to the end of March 2024, and a total of 22,347 tonnes since the telecoms company began stripping and selling the cabling in 2023.

«

Telephone cabling weights between 150 and 400 pounds per mile, which is about 70kg to 180kg per mile, so 1 tonne is between 5 and 15 miles. So 20,000 tonnes translates to about 100,000 miles of cabling.
unique link to this extract

Think twice before installing this device promising free movies • Ars Technica

Dan Goodin:

»

As online services get better at blocking malicious traffic, the attackers and scammers behind them have been forced to find new ways to reach their targets. The alternative of choice is now what are known as residential proxy networks. These systems funnel millions of home Internet connections into a unified network, and the proxy operators allow attackers to route their malicious traffic through these connections for a fee. The online services see only IP addresses with good reputations and geolocations that don’t stand out.

More often than not, the home users have no idea that their connections are being used to facilitate crime and occasionally even nation-state attacks. Users who do know often don’t care much. In exchange for leasing out part of their unlimited bandwidth to others, many get free movie and TV show streaming. Several less tech-savvy people I know who own such digital media players have told me, after I explain how the media players piggyback off their connections, that the bonanza of content is worth it. They find the tangible benefits outweigh the abstract harm they pose.

Research published Monday brings the threat into much clearer view. Security firm Plume cataloged a vast ecosystem of malware that preys squarely on users of SuperBox, just one of many media players offering pirated content. These malicious apps can be surreptitiously installed by remote attackers even when the devices are positioned behind a router. While Monday’s deep-dive analysis focused exclusively on SuperBox, Plume warned that dozens of similar streaming devices pose precisely the same threat.

“Our researchers found that these residential proxy networks are not simply monetization tools,” Plume researchers wrote. “They are actively being used as a target for additional malware delivery, enabling cybercriminals to infect already-compromised devices with entirely new malware families while remaining largely invisible to the device owner.”

«

The problem really is that people don’t care if they aren’t affected themselves. See no evil, hear no evil. It’s everyone else who suffers. It would take dramatic action by ISPs or the government against these boxes to shut them down. But there are millions out there.
unique link to this extract

New satellite images reveal surprise cause of Nepal floods: ‘not just a glacier’ • The Week

Meera Suresh:

»

Earth scientists have finally shed light on how the tragic Nepal flood that claimed thousands of lives happened, with the latest satellite images revealing not just the glacier, but also that the bedrock under the glacier had collapsed.

Geomorphologists Kristen Cook and Dan Shugar claimed that  further analysis of the satellite images from Nepal revealed there was a “big bedrock failure that took part of the glacier with it.”

The glacier broke off in a northwest direction and then fell westward into the river flow.

They told AP that clouds and debris obscured initial images from Nepal on Wednesday, so they could only see that part of a glacier had broken off from the Langtang Lirung peak, near the border with Tibet. However, the images taken on Thursday revealed that the bedrock underneath the glacier had collapsed, taking the massive chunk of ice down with it and sending boulders and ice into the valley.

“It shows the whole area without anything hidden, and we could see that, yes, it looked like there was not only this glacier that had failed, but a much larger chunk of the bedrock of the mountainside itself that had given way,” said Shugar, associate professor at the University of Calgary. “You have this big bedrock failure that took part of the glacier with it.”

…Alton Byers, a mountain geographer at the University of Colorado at Boulder, believes Wednesday’s flooding is related to climate change. He said the permafrost that for millennia has helped to hold together high-altitude rock and ice and soil and glaciers is now weakening and becoming unstable.

«

unique link to this extract

Steve Jobs, closed Macs, and me: a guest post • Pogue’s Posts

Del Yocam was hired as director of materials at Apple in 1979:

»

When Walter Isaacson phoned me to get information about Steve Jobs for his biography of Steve, I told him: “I think his desire for complete control of whatever he makes derives directly from his personality and the fact that he was abandoned at birth. He wants to control his environment, and he sees the product as an extension of himself.”

Nowhere was that truer than with Steve’s closed Macintosh computer.

…Steve and I had many discussions about the benefits and limitations of both open and closed computers. He wanted a faster processor, an advanced operating system, and specific writing and drawing applications. Steve loved the design perfection of a closed system. It meant everything worked as designed. Nothing needed to be added.

I would say to Steve, “No one person has the creative ability to design, develop, and deliver what you want to do—let alone the education and experience. And enclosing it like a toaster, with no expansion slots, is an exercise in futility.”

Steve would argue that the benefits outweighed the limitations. “The Macintosh will be more powerful, with an advanced operating system and specific applications, for a much lower price—under $1,000.” Then came the telling statement: “I can do it.”

For Steve, the closed Mac would be his baby. He wanted to prove that he could design the perfect system, fully complete without the need for expansion slots.

…when the Mac failed to live up to Steve’s optimistic sales forecast, everyone had a theory about why it hadn’t worked. I heard them all: “It’s too expensive.” “Not enough memory.” And the one that rang truest: “Where are the expansion slots?”

«

unique link to this extract

This is what it feels like to live through a political revolution • The New York Times

A conversation between John Guida, a NYT opinion editor, and Ivan Krastev, a political theorist who lived through a post-Communist revolution in his home country, Bulgaria:

»

Krastev: In the first year of his return to the White House, Trump’s political speed helped him to take the initiative. He was doing things so fast that he left others living in a state of total disorientation. But now — and this is very clear in the case of war with Iran — Trump has become the victim of his own time zone. It’s almost as if he can take two contradictory positions at the same time — a quantum revolution in politics. But the magic of his words is starting to fade away.

The constant reversal of position results in political impotence. The markets, but also Trump’s allies and his enemies, started to dismiss what the president is saying. Political time is reduced to a moment without history or future. Trump does not wait for others to name buildings after him; he does this himself, and this creates some sense of apocalyptic time.

Guida: Do you think that narrowing of time has affected the posture of the United States? America has traditionally been seen as a country leading the way into or certainly open to the future. Now we are torn in ways that call back to the past: on the one side, MAGA; on the other, socialism. What happened to the future?

Krastev: The future has vanished. The only future we talk about are different dystopian scenarios involving climate, demography, artificial intelligence. The disappearance of the future is a major contrast with America’s history and America’s self-understanding.

America first defined itself in opposition to old aristocratic Europe; it was the New World, setting itself apart in categories like tolerance and freedom. In the Cold War, it defined itself in opposition to the Soviet Union, and because the Soviet project was obsessed with the future, the American project was also universalist and very much future-oriented. Now America, or at least MAGA, wants to replace the future with the past. Europeans have done it before, but America is not a European nation-state, so going back to the golden past is not easy.

…Shared fear of the future cannot bring the world together, because there is one thing that is more terrifying than that we all will die, and that is that some will die and others will be immortal. It is interesting to compare student protests in the 1960s to today’s. We will be shocked to realize that back then, young people protested because they did not want to live the lives of their parents; they wanted better lives. Today they protest because they fear — and for good reasons — that they will have lives worse than those of their parents. They demand to have something like the same quality of life that their parents did.

«

“The future has vanished” is a very bleak phrase.
unique link to this extract

Chefs say Michelin Guide at risk of ‘losing credibility’ over suspected lack of inspectors • The Guardian

George Francis Lee:

»

How many inspectors does it take to review the country’s best restaurants – a pinch, a baker’s dozen? For more than a century the answer has been kept secret by the world’s authority on good food: the Michelin Guide.

But the French tyre company’s famous hotel and restaurant reference book has been challenged by chefs, restaurant critics and diners, who question whether the guide has enough of its anonymous inspectors to adequately review and monitor the eateries that are included each year.

Founded in 1900 as a free motorists guide, the red books’ recommendations gained influence in the culinary world, and by 1931 a ranking system was fully introduced: one, two and three stars to denote increasing levels of quality. Michelin stars are now shorthand for some of the best restaurants in the world. They are awarded every year and restaurants with the accolade are appraised by inspectors annually to judge whether they can gain, keep or lose stars.

But chefs and hospitality insiders claim some restaurants go for years without being inspected, and fear Michelin has “lost its credibility”. They believe the inspectors cannot keep up with monitoring the number of restaurants in the guide – there are now 19,653 global entries, according to Michelin’s website – and say that this has “undermined the reliability of the guide”.

…with a growing list of starred restaurants in the UK and Ireland guide alone – from 185 in 2021 to 230 in 2026 – some wonder if there are enough inspectors to repeatedly visit restaurants and ensure high standards are maintained.

“It’s absolutely the case that Michelin doesn’t send its inspectors to all of their starred restaurants every year. They can’t get to them all,” said Marshall Manson, CEO of the public relations firm FleishmanHillard and the author of the hospitality blog Professional Lunch.

«

Here’s a scaling problem which is nothing to do with the internet. How do you grow the number of people who have the requisite taste(buds) to determine Michelin starred-ness? The answer almost certainly is you can’t.
unique link to this extract

An island mysteriously appeared — then disappeared — on British Columbia’s largest reservoir • CBC News

Matt Preprost:

»

No one knows where it came from or where it went, but a massive new island might be floating out somewhere in the Williston Reservoir in northern British Columbia (B.C.).

The forested land mass caught the attention of B.C. Hydro and local residents earlier this month after it was spotted bobbing in the massive man-made lake north of Mackenzie.

Rocky Avery says video and pictures of the island were taken by a boater and later shared with him. He posted them on social media, and they quickly went viral.

“It was a pretty amazing sight to see, never seen anything like that in my 40 years in this country,” said Avery. “There was a big fishing derby coming up, so I wanted to make sure everybody was aware of what was going on. And I wanted B.C. Hydro to know too that it was out there, just in case it was floating down their way.”

The discovery left Bob Gammer, a B.C. Hydro spokesperson, incredulous when CBC News first inquired about the island’s origins.

…The Williston reservoir, impounded behind the W.A.C. Bennett Dam in 1968, is the seventh-largest reservoir in the world and visible from space. High winter snowpacks and steady summer rains have filled it to the brim, forcing B.C. Hydro to open the dam’s spillways in June and July to release water.

Gammer says it’s likely the island formed over many years somewhere along the shore where driftwood accumulated, allowing plants and trees to take root in the decomposing debris. As reservoir levels rose, it broke free, and winds carried it out into open water.

“We haven’t had a full reservoir in 14 years,” Gammer said. “We can’t pinpoint the origin of this floating island [but that’s] one explanation that seems reasonable.”

Avery says this year’s high water has washed out shoreline sand dunes popular for quad-biking, and pulled more trees and debris out into the lake than usual. “There’s areas we would never even drive a boat on before, and now we’re going up over top of it,” said Avery.

«

unique link to this extract

“iT woRKs BeTter in THe aPp!!” • Terence Eden’s Blog

Terence Eden:

»

The monkey-punchers at Google never quite seem to finish any of their apps. There’s always some useful bit of work left undone, or showstopping bug which remains unfixed, a thousand jagged edges as yet unsolved by the greatest minds of their generation.

I wanted to subscribe to an events calendar. I had a URl. I had my Google™ Pixel® phone running the latest Android© 17 with an updated calendar app. Is it possible to click on a calendar link and add it to my phone?

No.

Here’s what Google has to say about the matter: “To subscribe to a new calendar, you must use a computer web browser. You can’t subscribe to a calendar in the Google Calendar app for Android, iPhone, or iPad.”

Really?!? I mean, f—ing really????

This isn’t the most complex software engineering task known to humanity. Add a + button. Pop open a text entry field. Validate. Save. Done. I’m sure even the shitty Gemini model can vibe code that in a couple of months, right?

Anyway, I opened calendar.google.com on my phone (using desktop mode), added the calendar, and it magically appeared in the app.
This is just pathetic.

In fairness, this isn’t only a Google problem. Many companies want a permanent presence on your homescreen and think you’re too thick to use your browser’s bookmarks feature. Maybe they’re right. Maybe an app is the only way to increase the engagement KPI sufficiently so Quinn in the leadership squad can hit their OKRs and get a bonus.

«

As one comment says, Google software comes in two forms: deprecated, and not yet ready.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified