Start Up: Facebook’s zucka culpa, Apple Watch gets hearty, alarming Theranos, Dropbox and avocado?, and more

Deir ez-Zur in Syria: the site of a 2007 Israeli air attack on a suspected Syrian nuclear reactor. Photo by Jeff Werner on Flickr.

A selection of 13 links for you. Not represented on Facebook. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Inside Israel’s secret raid on Syria’s nuclear reactor • POLITICO


Israel — which, despite having one of the world’s most competent and aggressive intelligence services, the Mossad — nearly missed the fact that North Korea was helping build a nuclear reactor in next-door Syria, a country long viewed by Israel as a dangerous threat.

The American CIA missed it, too, and now, 11 years after Israeli air force jets bombed the clandestine Syrian facility, Israel’s military censor is finally lifting the veil of secrecy and permitting locally based reporters to publish interviews with participants in the operation for the first time. We spoke with dozens of former cabinet ministers, including Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, as well as military and intelligence chiefs and commanders and even some of the pilots who took part in the operation. The codename for the Sept. 6, 2007, raid, conducted near the remote desert city of Deir ez-Zur: “Outside the Box.” Before today, Israel has never officially acknowledged its existence.

Years later, Israeli spooks are still raising bitter questions about the CIA’s intelligence failure. Former Mossad director Tamir Pardo asked in an interview with us: “Where were the Americans? North Korea is a highly important target for them. And it still isn’t clear whether [Syrian President Bashar] Assad was running the nuclear project, or was it the North Koreans?” The former spy chief added that he has some doubts that Syria was going to keep the plutonium, or perhaps it was going to be shipped to North Korea as a supply of which the West would be unaware. “This is a resounding failure by the Americans,” Pardo said.

Pardo’s questions raise another: If one of the best intelligence communities in the world, and certainly the most formidable in the Middle East, could be fooled by North Koreans and Syrians, what might the CIA be missing? That could be true in Korea, in Iran, or almost anywhere on Earth.


The full article details a litany of oversights and wrong assumptions. But the correct action in the end.
link to this extract

I want to share an update on the Cambridge Analytica situation • Facebook

Mark Zuckerberg:


In this case, we already took the most important steps a few years ago in 2014 to prevent bad actors from accessing people’s information in this way. But there’s more we need to do and I’ll outline those steps here:

First, we will investigate all apps that had access to large amounts of information before we changed our platform to dramatically reduce data access in 2014, and we will conduct a full audit of any app with suspicious activity. We will ban any developer from our platform that does not agree to a thorough audit. And if we find developers that misused personally identifiable information, we will ban them and tell everyone affected by those apps. That includes people whose data Kogan misused here as well.

Second, we will restrict developers’ data access even further to prevent other kinds of abuse. For example, we will remove developers’ access to your data if you haven’t used their app in 3 months. We will reduce the data you give an app when you sign in — to only your name, profile photo, and email address. We’ll require developers to not only get approval but also sign a contract in order to ask anyone for access to their posts or other private data. And we’ll have more changes to share in the next few days.

Third, we want to make sure you understand which apps you’ve allowed to access your data. In the next month, we will show everyone a tool at the top of your News Feed with the apps you’ve used and an easy way to revoke those apps’ permissions to your data. We already have a tool to do this in your privacy settings, and now we will put this tool at the top of your News Feed to make sure everyone sees it.

Beyond the steps we had already taken in 2014, I believe these are the next steps we must take to continue to secure our platform.


I knew Facebook would say that this had all been fixed in 2014. (It’s all in the past…) But the new stuff? Signing contracts to ask for access? And he’s still describing it as a “platform”. That’s where the trouble began.

Also: sorry seems to be the hardest word. It doesn’t appear in his post.
link to this extract

Mark Zuckerberg says Facebook will audit thousands of apps after ‘breach of trust’ • The Washington Post

Elizabeth Dwoskin:


After the Tuesday meeting [which neither Zuckerberg nor Sandberg attended], employees posted on social media about how demoralized they felt. In an app for anonymously discussing the workplace, Blind, which requires a corporate email address to join, a Facebook employee posted, “Is this how the downfall of Myspace happened?” Another person wrote, “I just keep thinking about my stock going to zero with all of this.” Others asked for advice about whether they should sell their stock and said they would advise recruits against joining the company.

Behind the scenes, Facebook was in damage-control mode. Lobbyists made the rounds on Capitol Hill. Communications executives sent statements to journalists saying workers and executives, including Zuckerberg, were “outraged” about being deceived. (Little was said about Facebook’s responsibilities except to defend the legality of its actions.)

Meanwhile, Facebook users began to comment that there were no articles about Cambridge Analytica on Facebook’s trending-news feed, a feature that showcases news stories on the right-hand side of the Facebook website, until late Tuesday afternoon. (Articles about Uber and were on the feed for much of the day.) And business case studies about the company’s efforts to assist political campaigns such as those of Barack Obama and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) were no longer indexed on the company’s website.


link to this extract

What the F*** was Facebook thinking? • Medium

James Allworth:


Think about the kind of damage someone with ill-intent could do to you if they had all of this: Your name. Your location. All your friends. Your family. Your work history. Your schooling. Your birthday. Your checkins. Your events. Your hometown. Your likes, photos. Your relationships. Your religion and politics.

And not just for you, but for one a half billion other people. Target’s data breach [of the details of one-third of US adults, in 2013] isn’t even in the ballpark.

At least Target had the decency to attempt to secure their user data from those who wanted to use it in ways that were never intended it when it was given to them. Facebook didn’t even bother. They just gave it away.

But this raises another question: why? Why on earth was Facebook giving away what amounts to the crown jewels for an advertising business: the incredibly valuable user data that allows advertisers to target? If you’re the fastest growing advertising business in the world, it makes no sense.

I don’t believe it was obliviousness to the impact that it might have — although Zuckerberg has demonstrated plenty of that over the years.

Nor do I think it was inept management — though people do forget how strategically inept Facebook was until it was dragged, kicking and screaming, into the mobile era.

The biggest reason?

For the longest period of time, Facebook was an advertising business that dreamed of being something else other than an advertising business. It wanted to be a platform. It was probably driven in part by the fact that, in tech, advertising is a pretty dirty business. And a platform? That’s the gold standard.

And if those are the grand illusions that you’ve got, it’s not your proprietary data that you view as the secret to your success (which you only need to advertise). Instead, it’s developers, and getting them to build on top of your precious platform.

And so began the great five year Facebook data giveaway to developers: If you build your apps on our platform, we’ll give you more user data than you could possibly imagine.

And that’s what happened. As Ben Thompson wrote on Stratechery as far back as 2013, Facebook was so focused on being a platform rather than being an advertising business that it almost missed the boat on mobile. The shift to mobile gave Facebook no choice but to abandon its platform pretensions, and effectively saved the company from itself.


As he also points out, there were a ton of startups built around the idea of relying on access to the social graph data.
link to this extract

Hm, i wonder what Mark Zuckerberg’s up to on Facebook right now • Huffington Post

Ashley Feinberg:


So what’s up with you, Mark Zuckerberg?

Thus far, the Facebook CEO and founder has kept himself out of public view. He didn’t surface at Tuesday’s meeting for Facebook employees, at which they were finally able to ask a company lawyer questions about what the world has learned over the past four days. Neither has he made any sort of public statement, even as Congress has been demanding that he answer for his company’s behavior. So what has Mark Zuckerberg been doing all this time? 

According to Facebook the company, Zuck’s been “working around the clock to get all the facts and take the appropriate action moving forward, because they understand the seriousness of this issue.” According to Facebook the website, however, he’s been busy smashing that “like” button.

Thanks to Facebook’s powerful public search features, we were able to see that Zuckerberg hit the like button on a Saturday morning post [a photo captioned “Winter wonderland”] by Swedish billionaire Daniel Ek.

As well as a post by early Facebook investor Don Graham.

Then, on Monday, he engaged with some precious content once again. 

So what has Mark Zuckerberg been up to? As of right now, the only thing we know definitively is that he’s been scrolling through his feed, liking pics of places he’d rather be.


Shameful. But the method of shaming is 👌
link to this extract

Tech giants face hundreds of millions in new taxes in Europe • WSJ

Natalia Drozdiak and Sam Schechner:


The proposed taxes are among Europe’s most-aggressive measures to target the perceived excesses of a small cadre of tech superpowers, including Facebook Inc. and Alphabet Inc.’s Google, potentially adding hundreds of millions of euros to some tech firms’ tax bills. The U.S. warned last week against imposing tax measures that single out digital companies.

On Wednesday, the European Commission, the bloc’s executive body, outlined an additional tax at 3% of revenue derived from certain digital activities by companies whose annual global revenue exceeds €750 million ($918 million). The tax, which is envisioned as temporary, would apply to services whose value is generated from user involvement, such as social media, ride-hailing or food-delivery platforms, and the selling of targeted ads.

Some U.S. tech giants rake in billions of euros via units in Europe, potentially exposing the firms to steep new taxes under the proposed new 3% levy on digital revenue.

The measure would expire once EU countries implement the commission’s proposal for long-term rules, which would tax profits companies make in countries where they have a significant number of users but might not have a physical presence. A company would have a “taxable digital presence” in a given country if it meets certain criteria, such as more than €7m in revenue or 100,000 users for the year…

…On average, the EU estimates that tech companies pay around 9.5% in tax on their profit on the continent, compared with 23.2% for traditional industries, though tech lobbyists dispute that figure.


All sounds groundbreaking, but an estimate is that this would only raise €4bn across the whole of the EU – which seems a tiny amount for such a dramatic move. Wouldn’t improving tax regimes – and making it harder for companies to shift revenues around – have a bigger effect without all the ructions?
link to this extract

Detecting atrial fibrillation with the Apple Watch: our clinically validated results •


[Cardiogram’s own neural network] DeepHeart has high accuracy [97% ±3%] on detecting atrial fibrillation in a hospital environment. The real world, however, is very different from a hospital bed. Motion, sweat, and sunscreen can cause inaccurate optical heart rate readings. Alcohol consumption and exercise can mask or be mistaken for arrhythmias. The task of detecting atrial fibrillation is much harder.

One measure of real world performance is discussed in the previous section: tuning accuracy on pseudo-ECG labels. In another branch of the experiment, DeepHeart was tasked with predicting self-reported persistent atrial fibrillation. This presented a more challenging task because the labels were not verified by an ECG, and so are less accurate. Furthermore, the task here is to predict users who suffer from atrial fibrillation, rather than to predict episodes of atrial fibrillation.

DeepHeart obtained a c-statistic of 71% (CI 0.64–0.78) on this validation set. This number demonstrates that DeepHeart is able to perform in a real world environment. The drop in c-statistic from 97% (Cardioversions) and 93% (Mobile ECG Tuning Set) to 71% is explained in part by imprecise labels: A patient may self-report atrial fibrillation even when he is not currently experiencing an episode.

In February of this year, we presented early results at the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence demonstrating that DeepHeart can predict diabetes with a c-statistic of 85%, high blood pressure at 81%, and sleep apnea at 83%. These results indicate that wearable devices can be used for large-scale, low-cost disease screening.

Imagine a world where diabetes can be caught early and reversed through behavioral change, where physicians are empowered by algorithms continuously analyzing troves of user data, and where everyone can benefit from low cost, non-invasive disease screening.


Very interesting – and now with clinical validation.
link to this extract

United Airlines: how bad strategy created a culture that kills puppies • Adam Hartung


The then Chairman of American Airlines received Wall Street Journal front-page coverage for realizing people weren’t eating their olives in first class, so he ordered olives removed from the first class meals. He was cheered for saving $100K. But what folks missed was that he, and his peers leading the airlines, were systematically trying to figure out “how do we offer the least possible service.” By focusing on a strategy of lowering cost, and being doggedly determined in that strategy, soon nothing else mattered.

Today, there are no free meals in coach, and terrible meals in first class. Management angered employees into strikes and multi-year negotiations, beating down compensation and eliminating benefits leading to unhappiness so bad that in 2010 a Jet Blue flight attendant pulled the emergency exit and jumped out of the plane as he quit.

So, all the airlines in America stink. And, many domestic airlines in Europe, such as Ryan Air, have followed suit. The execs keep saying “all customers care about is price.” They use that excuse to create a culture so hostile to employees, and customers, that pretty soon employees are beating up customers and killing family pets (after charging extra to take the pet on the plane) and actually not caring.

Employees have become gestapos for the leadership – which has created a culture in which nobody wins. So flight attendants do as little as possible, because they don’t care about customers any more than leadership does. In 2017, a JetBlue attendant threw a family off flight because their toddler kicked the seat. When a woman complains about a child in seat next to her a Delta attendant throws her off the plane. And just last week when a 2 year old cries during boarding a Southwest attendant throws the child and her father off the plane.


Deregulation led to an oligopoly. Now, customers have no choice. Some of us fly almost every week on business, and it is pure hell. Nobody we deal with, from TSA to airport vendors to airline staff like customers. The culture has become “I’m abused, so you will be abused.” To fly is to succumb to being obsequious to ALL employees in your effort to not anger anyone, for fear they will deny you service. Or, worse, beat you up or kill your pet. But, honestly, there is nothing customers can do about it.
link to this extract

Millennials investing in Spotify and Dropbox IPOs, says Stockpile • CNBC

Ari Levy:


Stockpile, a website that lets people buy stock in the form of gift cards and purchase fractional shares in companies, is fielding a growing number of emails from customers asking when they can buy shares in music streaming service Spotify and software developer Dropbox, said Avi Lele, the start-up’s CEO.

Two-thirds of Stockpile’s account holders are under age 35, and among the most popular stocks for them to buy are Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Facebook, Tesla and Netflix, Lele said. For Spotify and Dropbox, investors can use Stockpile to order shares when they begin trading, though the purchases won’t go through until the market close that day.

Based on what customers are telling him, Lele expects both offerings to resonate with his audience because they’re popular services that consumers use all the time.

“They’re perfect examples of buying what you know and what you use on a daily basis,” said Lele, who was a lawyer for 15 years before co-founding Stockpile in 2011. “There are a lot of stocks that go public that our audience, and people in general, aren’t that familiar with.”


Being familiar as a user with a company’s product doesn’t make it a good investment.
link to this extract

Reporter’s notebook: the tale of Theranos and the mysterious fire alarm • California Healthline

Jenny Gold had to jump through hoops to try to get an interview with Theranos’s Elizabeth Holmes; first she wanted to speak to people getting its fingerprick test:


I arrived at the Walgreens on the morning of Nov. 4 and was met by two Theranos press representatives who would supervise my visit. I took out my recording equipment (the story was for NPR) and began approaching patients who were waiting in line to check in for testing. Some didn’t want to talk to a reporter, but others were open and gracious, sharing with me the reasons they had decided to give Theranos a try. One couple offered to let me come with them into the small testing room, set up to feel like a relaxing spa.

A pattern quickly emerged — none of the patients I talked to that day could get a finger-prick test, as promised. Instead, they received a regular venous blood draw, the same as I’d received on numerous occasions at my doctor’s office, though the phlebotomist said the needle was slightly smaller.

I asked the phlebotomist: Was this standard? Did most patients get the venous draw? She told me they “did more finger sticks than venous draws,” but couldn’t give me a number. One of the PR people approached me — I was not authorized to talk to the phlebotomist, he said — and asked me to erase the audio I had recorded. I declined.

I asked him: Why were none of the patients getting a finger prick? Just bad luck and timing, he said. This wasn’t how it usually was, he promised. And wouldn’t I just rather get a finger prick myself and report on the experience, as so many other journalists had agreed to do?

I said no. I needed an actual patient to make a compelling radio story. So, I continued waiting for other patients.

Soon, the two Theranos representatives approached me again — with a third on the phone, who said she wanted to talk to me. They were getting complaints about my asking patients questions, she told me. The main Theranos office had gotten several calls from people who had been in the Walgreens that morning, she claimed, complaining that a reporter was bothering them.

I hadn’t pressured anyone. The patients I’d interviewed had all been perfectly friendly and willing. I’ve also been a health reporter for 10 years, and never have I been told I was pushing patients to do something that made them uncomfortable.


Then things got weirder.
link to this extract

Spotify for brands: what is the value of streaming data? • Spotify

Spotify has a page in which Adam Bly, VP of data – who formerly worked at the big data company Seed Scientific – is interviewed by someone or other for the company. He gave his talk in 2017.


At Cannes, you’ll be demonstrating what this research can reveal about individual users. Can you give a hint of what we might expect?

So the first generation of user understanding for Spotify had been about knowing what people like at a very high level, in terms of their affinity for certain genres and artists. If you start from that premise—that we have best-in-class (and always-improving) understanding of music taste and now want to go deeper—then the next thing to look at is: How does that taste change in time and space?

One thing that’s really interesting to understand is how much a user forms routine. Are there times in the day, for a certain individual, where a certain kind of music, or a certain kind of listening, is really important to them? Are they the the kind of person who has a very specific weekday behavior, so Sunday is noticeably different than the rest of the week? For the first time, we’re really starting to see these musical journeys at an individual level.

How does the research benefit Spotify as a product? And how can it benefit brands and marketers?

Within the product, we are working to set the standard for state-of-the-art personalization. That doesn’t mean just getting a general sense of your taste spot on—it means being able to truly soundtrack your life in a profoundly meaningful way. This takes us to another level in making the product experience more relevant to our users.

Of course, as the product is more relevant to our users, it becomes ever more valuable to brands. They can use Spotify to interact with those users in moments that could be mutually beneficial to both the brand and the user. That’s sort of the Holy Grail of advertising.

What all of this data affords Spotify is the opportunity to create a level of ad personalization that is quite unprecedented. It stems from what we can learn about our users, and what we can express to brands anonymously, so they can craft the right strategy and creative, and present the right message to the right user at the right time.


But we’re all concerned about companies capturing data now, correct?
link to this extract

YouTube will ‘frustrate’ some users with ads so they pay for music • Bloomberg

Lucas Shaw:


YouTube has tried to sell its users paid music services in the past, with little to show for it. Most of those efforts predate [new Google global head of music Lyor] Cohen, who joined YouTube in 2016 after about 30 years in the record business, including stints as a road manager for Run-DMC and a senior executive at Warner Music Group.

This time will be different, Cohen says. The new service, which is already being used by thousands of Google employees, will “frustrate and seduce” users of YouTube’s free service. It will include exclusive videos, playlists and other offerings that will appeal to die-hard music fans. YouTube has already been funding the production of videos, taking fans behind-the-scenes with artists like rapper G-Eazy and Cuban-American singer Camila Cabello.

The new approach marks a big cultural shift for YouTube and its parent. Google, a division of Alphabet Inc., has sustained the most popular video site and search engine in the world by prioritizing free, easy-to-use services.

Cohen said he prevailed upon his colleagues and bosses to make some changes to “be good partners” to the music industry. They will “smoke out” people who can afford to pay for a subscription and shepherd them to the new service.

“There’s a lot more people in our funnel that we can frustrate and seduce to become subscribers,” Cohen said. “Once we do that, trust me, all that noise will be gone and articles people write about that noise will be gone.”


This comes after years and years of criticism from the music business that YouTube was effectively letting people listen for free to music (via gigantic playlists of videos) but with a colossally low payout rate compared to streaming services.

Be very interested to see (a) whether it works (b) what numbers Google releases about it. The music industry should see any effect: it’ll be clear from royalty payments.
link to this extract

Ditch all those other messaging apps: here’s why you should use Signal • Wired

Jordan McMahon:


Signal looks and works a lot like other basic messaging apps, so it’s easy to get started. It’s especially convenient if you have friends and family overseas because, like iMessage and WhatsApp, Signal lets you sidestep expensive international SMS fees. It also supports voice and video calls, so you can cut out Skype and FaceTime. Sure, you don’t get fancy stickers or games like some of the competition, but you can still send pictures, videos, and documents. It’s available on iOS, Android, and desktop.

But plenty of apps have all that stuff. The thing that actually makes Signal superior is that it’s easy to ensure that the contents of every chat remain private and unable to be read by anyone else. As long as both parties are using the app to message each other, every single message sent with Signal is encrypted. Also, the encryption Signal uses is available under an open-source license, so experts have had the chance to test and poke the app to make sure it stays as secure as what’s intended.

If you’re super concerned about messages being read by the wrong eyes, Signal lets you force individual conversations to delete themselves after a designated amount of time. Signal’s security doesn’t stop at texts. All of your calls are encrypted, so nobody can listen in. Even if you have nothing to hide, it’s nice to know that your private life is kept, you know, private.

Yes, this list of features sounds a lot like WhatsApp. It’s true, the Facebook-owned messaging app has over a billion users, offers most of the same features, and even employs Signal’s encryption to keep chats private. But WhatsApp raises a few concerns that Signal doesn’t. First, it’s owned by Facebook, a company whose primary interest is in collecting information about you to sell you ads. That alone may steer away those who feel Facebook already knows too much about us. Even though the content of your WhatsApp messages are encrypted, Facebook can still extract metadata from your habits, like who you’re talking to and how frequently.

Still, if you use WhatsApp, chances are you already know a lot of other people who are using it. Getting all of them to switch to Signal is highly unlikely. And you know, that’s OK—WhatsApp really is the next-best option to Signal.


Signal is definitely a good app. It became the de facto comms tool for the Clinton campaign – which, unlike John Podesta’s personal email inbox, wasn’t hacked.
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: earlier this week there was a suggestion that Sierra Leone had run sorta kinda the world’s first blockchain election. The update: nope, not really.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

Start Up: Facebook’s problems deepen, the illegal blockchain?, WileyFox lives!, Apple’s FaceID lead, and more

Venezuela’s currency now has a crypto sibling – apparently helped by Russia. Photo by Ammon Beckstrom on Flickr.

A selection of 12 links for you. Quite Facebooky. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Child abuse imagery found within bitcoin’s blockchain • The Guardian

Samuel Gibbs:


German researchers have discovered unknown persons are using bitcoin’s blockchain to store and link to child abuse imagery, potentially putting the cryptocurrency in jeopardy.

The blockchain is the open-source, distributed ledger that records every bitcoin transaction, but can also store small bits of non-financial data. This data is typically notes about the trade of bitcoin, recording what it was for or other metadata. But it can also be used to store links and files.

Researchers from the RWTH Aachen University, Germany found that around 1,600 files were currently stored in bitcoin’s blockchain. Of the files least eight were of sexual content, including one thought to be an image of child abuse and two that contain 274 links to child abuse content, 142 of which link to dark web services.

“Our analysis shows that certain content, eg, illegal pornography, can render the mere possession of a blockchain illegal,” the researchers wrote. “Although court rulings do not yet exist, legislative texts from countries such as Germany, the UK, or the USA suggest that illegal content such as [child abuse imagery] can make the blockchain illegal to possess for all users.”

“This especially endangers the multi-billion dollar markets powering cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin.”

While the spending of bitcoin does not necessarily require a copy of the blockchain to facilitate, some processes, such as some mining techniques, require the downloading of the full blockchain or chunks of it.


link to this extract

Exclusive: Russia secretly helped Venezuela launch a cryptocurrency to evade US sanctions • Time

Simon Shuster:


Ever since 2014, when the US and its allies used sanctions to punish Russia for invading parts of Ukraine, the Russian elites have been desperate to get those sanctions lifted and, in the long term, to weaken the West’s ability to impose them in the future. One of the core aims of these efforts, as Putin outlined in a policy paper on global trade that was published in September, is to “overcome the excessive dominance” of Western currencies, and especially the dollar.

Putin’s advisers have been more open about their ultimate aim: “The reign of the dollar must end,” Andrei Kostin, the head of state-controlled VTB, Russia’s second-largest bank, said in a speech last month in Moscow, calling on Russia to promote other currencies for use in international trade. “This whip that the Americans use in the form of the dollar would then, to a great extent, not have such a serious impact on the global financial system.”

While not as ambitious as the Russian attempt in 2016 to influence the US presidential election, the Kremlin’s move into cryptocurrencies reveals another layer of ingenuity in its struggle against what Putin’s advisers have called the US “hegemony” in global affairs. The use of cryptocurrencies could, at least in theory, hurt the US ability to control the flow of money in and out of sanctioned countries, thus chipping away at one of most powerful means of US influence around the world…

…instead of putting the ruble at risk, Russia encouraged its ally in Latin America to run the experiment on itself, the banker says. “Venezuela has nothing to lose. For them it’s the only chance.” Indeed, the value of the Venezuelan currency, the bolivar, has been decimated by official mismanagement and the impact of US sanctions, which were imposed last year to punish Maduro for his deepening authoritarianism. The crisis has also made Maduro’s regime deeply dependent on Russia for loans and investments.

“So Russia made its stronghold here in Venezuela,” says Armando Armas, an opposition member of the nation’s parliament, the National Assembly, which has tried in vain to block the creation of the petro. “Now they are using Venezuela as a guinea pig for their experiment,” Armas tells TIME by phone from Caracas.


The dollar collapsing due to China and Russia and others creating an alternative currency is the starting point for Lionel Shriver’s “The Mandibles”. And here’s Russia trying to make that a true story.
link to this extract

How a self-driving Uber killed a pedestrian in Arizona • The New York Times

Troy Griggs and Daisuke Wakabayashi:


The car, a Volvo XC90 sport utility vehicle outfitted with Uber’s sensor system, was in autonomous mode when it struck Elaine Herzberg, a 49-year-old woman, around 10 p.m. on Sunday. There was a human safety driver at the wheel, but the car was carrying no passengers.

The vehicle was doing about 40 miles per hour on a street with a 45 m.p.h. speed limit when it struck Ms. Herzberg, who was walking her bicycle across the street, according to the Tempe police.

Officials also said that it did not appear as though the car had slowed down before impact and that the Uber safety driver had shown no signs of impairment. The weather was clear and dry.

The accident was a reminder that self-driving technology is still in the experimental stage, as Silicon Valley giants, major automakers and other companies race to develop vehicles that can drive on their own. Governments, for their part, are still trying to figure out how to regulate the technology, and a patchwork of rules are currently in place around the country.

Uber’s self-driving program first started in Pittsburgh in Sept. 2016, and extended to Tempe in Feb. 2017.


Earlier reports suggested the car was doing 38mph in a 35mph zone, which would be breaking the law. The 40mph in a 45mph zone is more believable. The police have suggested that a human driver might not have been able to stop – but that’s not the point; SDCs are meant to have better systems and reactions than humans.
link to this extract

Cambridge Analytica says it won the election for Trump. Here’s what it’s actually talking about • Buzzfeed

Craig Silverman:


A pro-Trump super PAC funded by the billionaire Mercer family used Cambridge Analytica to help it generate millions of views for dark posted Facebook ads that aggressively attacked Hillary Clinton during the fall of 2016.

BuzzFeed News examined 27 dark posted ads from the Defeat Crooked Hillary Facebook page, which was run by the Make America Number One super PAC. (A dark posted ad looks like a post from a Facebook page but does not show up on a page’s public timeline and is only seen by the users it was targeted to reach.)

The video ads — which were directed at specific audience segments on Facebook — pushed themes of Clinton’s corruption, her supposed failing health, and referred to her as “the most corrupt politician of our time” while suggesting she “might be the first president to go to jail.”

Make America Number One paid more than $1.2m to Cambridge Analytica during the 2016 election cycle for services including campaign management consulting, web services, and “data acquisition services,” according to filings with the Federal Election Commission. The PAC did not disclose exactly what ads the firm worked on, or the specifics of the data and targeting services it provided. But Cambridge Analytica won an award and has previously taken credit for at least one of the PAC’s ads, which featured Michelle Obama and resulted in cease and desist letters from the Clinton campaign, as well as low ratings from fact-checkers.

Both Cambridge Analytica and Make America Number One are financed by Robert and Rebekah Mercer, who backed Donald Trump in the general election.


link to this extract

Exclusive: Mark Zuckerberg AWOL from Facebook’s data leak damage control session • Daily Beast

Spencer Ackerman:


It’s not just that he’s silent in public. Facebook CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg declined to face his employees on Tuesday to explain the company’s role in a widening international scandal over the 2016 election.

Facebook employees on Tuesday got the opportunity for an internal briefing and question-and-answer session about Facebook’s role with the Trump-aligned data firm Cambridge Analytica. It was the first the company held to brief and reassure employees after, ahead of damaging news reports, Facebook abruptly suspended Cambridge Analytica. The Q&A session was first reported by The Verge.

But Zuckerberg himself wasn’t there, The Daily Beast has learned. Instead, the session was conducted by a Facebook attorney, Paul Grewal, according to a source familiar with the meeting. That was the same approach the company used on Capitol Hill this past fall, when it sent its top attorney, Colin Stretch, to brief Congress about the prevalence of Russian propaganda, to include paid ads and inauthentic accounts, on its platform.

Nor, The Daily Beast has learned, did chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg attend the internal town hall.


I’m sure this is going to be just fine. He’s only been instructed to appear by the FTC in the US and the select committee of MPs for Culture, Media And For Some Reason Sport in the UK.

(Facebook later issued a statement: “Mark, Sheryl and their teams are working around the clock to get all the facts and take the appropriate action moving forward, because they understand the seriousness of this issue,” the statement said. “The entire company is outraged we were deceived. We are committed to vigorously enforcing our policies to protect people’s information and will take whatever steps are required to see that this happens.”)
link to this extract

October 2010: Facebook in online privacy breach; applications transmitting identifying information • WSJ

Emily Steel and Geoffrey Fowler, in October 2010:


Many of the most popular applications, or “apps,” on the social-networking site Facebook Inc. have been transmitting identifying information—in effect, providing access to people’s names and, in some cases, their friends’ names—to dozens of advertising and Internet tracking companies, a Wall Street Journal investigation has found.

The issue affects tens of millions of Facebook app users, including people who set their profiles to Facebook’s strictest privacy settings. The practice breaks Facebook’s rules, and renews questions about its ability to keep identifiable information about its users’ activities secure.

The problem has ties to the growing field of companies that build detailed databases on people in order to track them online—a practice the Journal has been examining in its What They Know series. It’s unclear how long the breach was in place. On Sunday, a Facebook spokesman said it is taking steps to “dramatically limit” the exposure of users’ personal information.

“A Facebook user ID may be inadvertently shared by a user’s Internet browser or by an application,” the spokesman said. Knowledge of an ID “does not permit access to anyone’s private information on Facebook,” he said, adding that the company would introduce new technology to contain the problem identified by the Journal.


I’m sure it’s they all made this just fine.
link to this extract

How Facebook Groups are being exploited to spread misinformation, plan harassment, and radicalize people • Buzzfeed

Craig Silverman:


One week after the mass shooting in Parkland, Florida, those searching on Facebook for information about the upcoming March for Our Lives were likely to be shown an active group with more than 50,000 members.

Called “March for Our Lives 2018 Official,” it appeared to be one of the best places to get details about the event and connect with others interested in gun control. But those who joined the group soon found themselves puzzled. The admins often posted pro-gun information and unrelated memes and mocked those who posted about gun control.

“I’m a retired federal law enforcement special agent. There is and never has been any reason for a civilian to have a high-capacity high velocity weapon,” posted one member on Feb. 20.

“Shutup fed and stop trying to spread your NWO BS,” was the top reply, which came from one of the group’s admins. (NWO is a reference to the “new world order” conspiracy theory.)

A few days later the group’s name was changed to “Kim Jong Un Fan Club,” and members continued to wonder what was going on.

The simple answer is they were being trolled. The more complicated one is that while Facebook groups may offer a positive experience for millions of people around the world, they have also become a global honeypot of spam, fake news, conspiracies, health misinformation, harassment, hacking, trolling, scams, and other threats to users, according to reporting by BuzzFeed News, findings from researchers, and the recent indictment of 13 Russians for their alleged efforts to interfere in the US election.


I’m sure it’s all going to be just fine.
link to this extract

Facebook’s surveillance machine • The New York Times

Zeynep Tufekci:


If Facebook failed to understand that this data could be used in dangerous ways, that it shouldn’t have let anyone harvest data in this manner and that a third-party ticking a box on a form wouldn’t free the company from responsibility, it had no business collecting anyone’s data in the first place. But the vast infrastructure Facebook has built to obtain data, and its consequent half-a-trillion-dollar market capitalization, suggest that the company knows all too well the value of this kind of vast data surveillance.

Should we all just leave Facebook? That may sound attractive but it is not a viable solution. In many countries, Facebook and its products simply are the internet. Some employers and landlords demand to see Facebook profiles, and there are increasingly vast swaths of public and civic life — from volunteer groups to political campaigns to marches and protests — that are accessible or organized only via Facebook.

The problem here goes beyond Cambridge Analytica and what it may have done. What other apps were allowed to siphon data from millions of Facebook users? What if one day Facebook decides to suspend from its site a presidential campaign or a politician whose platform calls for things like increased data privacy for individuals and limits on data retention and use? What if it decides to share data with one political campaign and not another? What if it gives better ad rates to candidates who align with its own interests?

A business model based on vast data surveillance and charging clients to opaquely target users based on this kind of extensive profiling will inevitably be misused.


link to this extract

Apple grabs two-year lead in 3D sensing race • Reuters

Sonam Rai and Stephen Nellis:


Tech research house Gartner predicts that by 2021, 40% of smartphones will be equipped with 3D cameras, which can also be used for so-called augmented reality, or AR, in which digital objects cling tightly to images of the real world.

“This kind of functionality is going to be very important for AR,” said Gartner analyst Jon Erensen. “I think that is something where you don’t want to get left behind.”

According to parts manufacturers Viavi Solutions Inc, Finisar Corp and Ams AG, bottlenecks on key parts will mean mass adoption of 3D sensing will not happen until next year, disappointing earlier expectations.

That means that China’s Huawei, Xiaomi and others could be a total of almost two years behind Apple, which launched Face ID with its iPhone X anniversary phone last September.

In particular, Android producers are struggling to source vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers, or VCSELs, a core part of Apple’s Face ID hardware.

“It is going to take them a lot of time, the Android-based customers, to secure capacity throughout the whole supply chain,” said Bill Ong, senior director of investor relations from Viavi, seen as the only major supplier of optical filters needed for the 3D sensing modules.


No doubting that the iPhone X has driven a big bump in sales at the top end for Apple. Along with the OLED and the removal of the home button, it’s a whole different phone from its predecessors. The Android rivals aren’t quite making that leap. FaceID was part of a bigger change.
link to this extract

Telegram loses bid to block Russia from encryption keys • Bloomberg

Ilya Khrennikov:


Supreme Court Judge Alla Nazarova on Tuesday rejected Telegram’s appeal against the Federal Security Service, the successor to the KGB spy agency which last year asked the company to share its encryption keys. Telegram declined to comply and was hit with a fine of $14,000. Communications regulator Roskomnadzor said Telegram now has 15 days to provide the encryption keys.

Telegram, which is in the middle of an initial coin offering of as much as $2.55bn, plans to appeal the ruling in a process that may last into the summer, according to the company’s lawyer, Ramil Akhmetgaliev. Any decision to block the service would require a separate court ruling, the lawyer said.

“Threats to block Telegram unless it gives up private data of its users won’t bear fruit. Telegram will stand for freedom and privacy,” Pavel Durov, the company’s founder, said on his Twitter page.

Putin signed laws in 2016 on fighting terrorism, which included a requirement for messaging services to provide the authorities with means to decrypt user correspondence. Telegram challenged an auxiliary order by the Federal Security Service, claiming that the procedure doesn’t involve a court order and breaches constitutional rights for privacy, according to documents.

The security agency, known as the FSB, argued in court that obtaining the encryption keys doesn’t violate users’ privacy because the keys by themselves aren’t considered information of restricted access. Collecting data on particular suspects using the encryption would still require a court order, the agency said.


That’s not looking good for Telegram users. On the other hand: Telegram is known as the recruiting base for a lot of extremist groups (Isis was a favourite).
link to this extract

Risks in IAB Europe’s proposed consent mechanism • PageFair

Johnny Ryan points to problems with the upcoming collision of the EU’s GDPR data protection regime and the desperate attempts by ad-tech companies to stick with their old business model:


The ad-tech companies who drafted the IAB [Internet Advertising Bureau] Europe proposal claim that “publishers have full control over who they partner with, who they disclose to their users and who they obtain consent for.” But the IAB Europe documentation shows that adtech companies would remain entirely free to trade the personal data with their business partners if they wish. The proposed system would share a unique consent record “throughout the online advertising ecosystem”, every time an ad is loaded on a website:


“the OpenRTB request [from a website to an ad exchange] will contain the entire DaisyBit [a persistent cookie], allowing a vendor to see which other vendors are an approved vendor or a publisher and whether they have obtained consent (and for which purposes) and which have not.”


There would be no control over what happens to personal data once they enter the RTB system: “[adtech] vendors may choose not to pass bid requests containing personal data to other vendors who do not have consent”. This is a critical problem, because the overriding commercial incentive for many of the companies involved is to share as many data with as many partners as possible, and to share it with parent companies that run data brokerages. In addition, publishers are expected to trust that JavaScript in “ad creatives” is not dropping trackers, even though no tools to police this are proposed here.

IAB Europe is asking publishers and brands to expose themselves to the legal risk of routinely sharing these personal data with several thousand adtech companies. What publishers and brands need is a “trust no one” approach. IAB Europe is proposing a “trust everyone” approach. Indeed, the proposed system looks like the GDPR’s description of a data breach…


Someone’s going to be in trouble with this.
link to this extract

Wileyfox is back: new handsets arriving this year and more good news for owners • TechRadar

John McCann:


another British phone-maker, STK, has agreed a licensing deal with the Wileyfox Group to sell the firm’s handsets in the UK, Europe and South Africa.

STK isn’t just selling the handsets though – it’ll also be offering after-sales care and services, including customer support.

There’s more good news for current Wileyfox owners too, as STK will honour warranties that are still in date, ensuring that you have the support you need if your phone develops a fault.

STK will sell the Wileyfox Swift 2, Swift 2 Plus and Swift 2 X, and it’s currently planning a roadmap to launch new Wileyfox handsets in the second half of 2018.

It’s also working on rolling out the Android 8.1 update to existing Swift 2 range of devices within the next three weeks, ensuring that customers are up to date with the latest software.

There’s more too, as STK is adapting its STK Care app, which provides 24/7 live chat support for users directly on their device, for Wileyfox devices, giving owners a direct point of contact if they run into any trouble with their phone.

TechRadar spoke exclusively to Henri Salameh, STK’s Commerical Director, who told us: “What we saw was a good opportunity to not only to continue the production of the Wileyfox handsets and reinstate after-sale and warranty support, but also to save jobs in UK and Europe while merging two strong UK brands together to operate under one roof.”

STK already has its own smartphone portfolio, but Salameh said it plans to keep the two brands separate as they complement each other.


link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

Start Up: Facebook’s woeful failures, unsentimental sentiment analysis, location-location-location?, and more

A self-driving Uber car: a pedestrian’s death means the safety debate is now serious. Photo by Eddie Codel on Flickr.

A selection of 15 links for you. Hands on the wheel, eyes on the road. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Facebook security chief said to leave after clashes over disinformation • The New York Times

Nicole Perlroth, Sheera Frenkel and Scott Shane:


Facebook’s chief information security officer, Alex Stamos, will leave the company after internal disagreements over how the social network should deal with its role in spreading disinformation, according to current and former employees briefed on the matter.

Mr. Stamos had been a strong advocate inside the company for investigating and disclosing Russian activity on Facebook, often to the consternation of other top executives, including Sheryl Sandberg, the social network’s chief operating officer, according to the current and former employees, who asked not to be identified discussing internal matters.

After his day-to-day responsibilities were reassigned to others in December, Mr. Stamos said he would leave the company. He was persuaded to stay through August to oversee the transition of his duties because executives thought his departure would look bad, the current and former employees said. He has been overseeing the transfer of his security team to Facebook’s product and infrastructure divisions. His group, which once had 120 people, now has three, the current and former employees said.

Mr. Stamos would be the first high-ranking employee to leave Facebook since controversy erupted over disinformation on its site. His departure is a sign of heightened leadership tensions at the company.


Where is Zuckerberg in all this? One expects he’ll pop up in a day or two, or post some big screed on his Facebook page. The longer he waits, the more directions the story splinters into.
link to this extract

Facebook and the endless string of worst-case scenarios • TechCrunch

Josh Constine:


Here’s an incomplete list of the massive negative consequences and specific abuses that stem from Facebook’s idealistic product development process. [Thanks to user suggestions, we’ve added some more in an upate].


It’s a long list – Beacon revealing shopping, “engagement ranked feed” leading to fake news, “engagement”-priced ads leading to polarising ads, app platform driving game spam, privacy controls that encourage you to make stuff public, and plenty, plenty more.

Facebook’s shares lost nearly 7% of their value through the day.
link to this extract

Uber halts autonomous cars after 49-year-old pedestrian is killed in Arizona • The Washington Post

Faiz Siddiqui and Michael Laris:


The National Transportation Safety Board has opened an investigation into the crash, NTSB spokesman Eric Weiss said.

Uber issued a short statement.

“Our hearts go out to the victim’s family. We are fully cooperating with local authorities in their investigation of this incident,” a company spokeswoman said.

The vehicle was in autonomous mode at the time of the crash, though a driver was behind the wheel, Tempe police said in a statement. The crash occurred about 10 p.m. Sunday in the area of Curry Road and Mill Avenue, a busy intersection with multiple lanes in every direction.

Police said the vehicle was northbound on Curry Road when a woman, identified as 49-year-old Elaine Herzberg, crossing from the west side of street, was struck. She died at a hospital, the department said.

Missy Cummings, a robotics expert at Duke University who has been critical of the swift rollout of driverless technology across the country, said the computer-vision systems for self-driving cars are “deeply flawed” and can be “incredibly brittle,” particularly in unfamiliar circumstances.


Herzberg wasn’t on a “crosswalk” (UK lingo: pedestrian crossing) when she was hit. But that’s irrelevant. Cars are meant to yield to pedestrians. Lots more to be discovered about this, including how fast the car was going, how well-lit things were, what system it was using to detect obstacles, and more.

So the first self-driving car has killed a non-driver. Now the really hard questions begin. Who’s responsible – the person inside the car, or the authors of the software? How do you stop this happening again – or is there a level of pedestrian killing that is “acceptable”?
link to this extract

Why America can’t regulate bitcoin • Hacker Noon


Hearings on Bitcoin and its derivatives are being held in the USA on a regular basis, and invariably the expert witnesses fail to properly describe the actual processes going on. If they used the correct language and excluded all analogies, the only possible conclusion would be that America cannot regulate Bitcoin under its current legal system. The Constitution guarantees the inalienable rights of American citizens, and therefore Bitcoin is a protected form of publishing. The only way Bitcoin can be made regulable is if the Constitution is changed; and that does not mean adding a new Amendment, it means removing the First Amendment entirely. Inevitably the anti-Bitcoin protagonists will face a robust and ultimately successful legal challenge that will remove the possibility of any sort of “BitLicense” or interference from the CTFC, FinCEN or any other agency. It will also remove any possibility of interference at the State level. The consequence of adhering to the basic law of the United States will cause America to become the centre of all Bitcoin business for the entire world.

Let me explain why this is the case.


It isn’t the case, because he hasn’t recognised the crucial difference between “printing out how bitcoin works” (free to do) and “offering money and services for bitcoins created using the process that was printed out” (which the government will tax and regulate).

Then again he thinks climate change is a fraud (he’s absolutely certain that “anthropogenic global warming theory has been falsified”) and that gun control is stupid.
link to this extract

The ridiculousness of sentiment analysis • Diginomica

Dennis Howlett got an email (three times!) from a PR company certain that it had got some amazing sentiment analysis on peoples’ opinions on social media about United Airlines suffocating a pet:


It was accompanied by the dross, breathtakingly insightful, no sh-t Sherlock commentary that:


This latest incident could be another massive blow to United’s reputation unless upper management takes control of the storm on social in an effective way. In this instance, United will need to do more than just apologize — they will need to provide solutions and reassure their wide customer base, and to do so intelligently, they must be mindful of the overwhelming responses they’re already receiving about the incident. Leveraging social listening during a crisis can help any brand gauge the right response, and hopefully, make a comeback.


And your point is…..????

I don’t know if these people have noticed, but following the United Breaks Guitars fiasco, the company barely missed a beat in reporting earnings.

The most recent incident, while wildly more egregious than the earlier one, will have almost zero effect on United. Unless…a few large corporate specifiers put ethics to the front of their choice parameters and say enough is enough.

The likelihood of that happening is almost zero because, like the other major U.S. airlines, United operates what are near monopoly hubs that act as choke points for others. You wanna go to the Bay Area from Chicago, Houston, Frankfurt or Denver? UA is pretty much your only realistic choice. In short, the U.S. airline majors operate as a set of cartels, ostensibly in competition, but in reality, having ‘safe’ harbors into and out of which they are the mob bosses owners with very little to lose.


link to this extract

Open Location Code and what3words • Medium

David Piesse:


Open Location Code is a Google (Zurich) based code library for giving a code to anywhere in the world. It is entirely based off of latitude and longitude tying it perfectly with GPS; and is indiscriminate with regards land, sea or population. It is a tiny amount of code for this algorithm, but has a few features that make it the best way to locate anything from a latitude & longitude.

Firstly it has scale. The code is built up of pairs of characters (e.g. 9C) that drill you into the next level of detail.

The first pair relates to a 20 by 20 degree square around the world (18 x 9 of them).

The second pair breaks this down to 1 degrees squares (20 by 20) within this 20 square degree area.

The third and fourth pair do the same again with 0.05 and 0.0025 degrees. That makes up roughly 10.3 billion areas.

Beyond that you can further refine up to 3 more characters, all of which are a 4×5 grid within the previous. At 10 characters (excluding the +) you have a area roughly 10m wide, at 11 characters it is only 3.4m x 2.7 ~ to w3w.

So to get to this area ( 6GCRMQPX+9GG) but people can’t remember that.

Cool — that is where w3w wins hands down. They have something that almost any literate people can understand.

However you can convert a OLC code into parts and potentially assign large levels of them a single word. Of the 162 top level areas only ~69 have any substantial population so we could assign only a few dozen words to over half the globe.

Think atlantic.something.something for the whole of the Atlantic ocean; or australia.something.something for Australia. This gives a high level drill down as to where you are. Large swathes of the globe can be covered with a few words; which both frees up word combinations, but also shortens codes eventually.


what3words is a neat concept but as he points out, it has some failings. His idea seems good; the trouble is making it work.
link to this extract

South Koreans reportedly not that enthusiastic about the Galaxy S9 • SamMobile

Adnan F.:


A local news outlet quotes mobile retailers in its report who have witnessed that consumers aren’t that interested in the Galaxy S9 and the Galaxy S9+ since they’re not that different from last year’s models.

Another retailer pointed out that it’s actually the Galaxy A8 (2018) that’s Samsung’s best-selling smartphone in South Korea currently. The handset’s dual front-facing camera is said to be one of the reasons why it’s immensely popular with the late-teens and 20s demographic which likes to take a lot of selfies.

Granted that the Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9+ are faster and feature better cameras but the design is largely the same and so is the display size. The new flagship looks and feels quite similar to its predecessor and that’s why it might be a difficult sell to those who already own the Galaxy S8…

…Customers who are sold on the new features like Super Slow-motion video, variable aperture camera, AR Emoji, etc will certainly go ahead and purchase the Galaxy S9. However, those who view them as mere novelties or can’t justify purchasing an expensive smartphone for only these features will likely wait for Samsung’s 10th anniversary Galaxy smartphone due next year.


Would have thought the target market is those who own something older than the S8, really. The TV adverts for the S9 in the UK are really good. But the top-end market is static, at best.
link to this extract

A shakeout is underway among VR startups • The Information

Matt Pressberg and Tom Dotan:


A shakeout is underway in the VR startup world. An early flow of investments by consumer marketers and film studios, enthusiastic about experimenting with VR for marketing, has dried up. Instead, studios and venture capitalists are focusing on arcade-style VR installations at malls and movie theaters. These typically charge $30 for a half hour experience tied to a movie—like the Star Wars VR experience near Disneyland, where people wearing headsets can roam amongst Stormtroopers. That’s not a business best suited to smaller VR studios.

The shift reflects the continuing search for a viable business model tied to VR content, which can cost north of $1m a minute to produce. Sales for consumer VR headsets also have been slower than expected, limiting the market for VR games and videos.

“The early phase of VR is over,” says Vince Pizzica, an executive vice president of  Technicolor, which integrates technology for VR content production. Making short entertainment for VR has “no business case,” he says. Aside from VR arcades, education and architecture are both markets with lots of potential, he says.

It’s too early to say whether “location-based entertainment,” as the venues are known, can generate a return for content producers and venue owners. Aside from the high cost of making the entertainment, consumer demand remains uncertain. Mr. Pizzica estimated that the arcade-style model has two or three years to prove it can make money.


Arcades were the first success story for VR. Maybe they’re going to be the second as well. But the signs aren’t promising.
link to this extract

Demand for augmented reality/virtual reality headsets expected to rebound in 2018 • IDC


Worldwide shipments for augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) headsets will grow to 68.9m units in 2022 with a five-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 52.5%, according to the latest forecast from the International Data Corporation (IDC) Worldwide Quarterly Augmented and Virtual Reality Headset Tracker. Despite the weakness the market experienced in 2017, IDC anticipates a return to growth in 2018 with total combined AR/VR volumes reaching 12.4m units, marking a year-over-year increase of 48.5% as new vendors, new use cases, and new business models emerge.

The worldwide AR/VR headset market retreated in 2017 primarily due to a decline in shipments of screenless VR viewers. Previous champions of this form factor stopped bundling these headsets with smartphones and consumers have shown little interest in purchasing such headsets separately. While the screenless VR category is waning, Lenovo’s successful fourth quarter launch of the Jedi Challenges Mirage headset—a screenless viewer for AR—showed the form factor may still have legs if paired with the right content. Other new product launches during the quarter included the first Windows Mixed Reality VR tethered headsets with entries from Acer, ASUS, Dell, Fujitsu, HP, Lenovo, and Samsung.

“There has been a maturation of content and delivery as top-tier content providers enter the AR and VR space,” said Jitesh Ubrani senior research analyst for IDC Mobile Device Trackers. “Meanwhile, on the hardware side, numerous vendors are experimenting with new financing options and different revenue models to make the headsets, along with the accompanying hardware and software, more accessible to consumers and enterprises alike.”


Not mentioned anywhere in this release: what the actual uses, demand and markets are that will drive this growth. I just don’t see it.
link to this extract

Be ready to pay a lot for Vive Pro’s higher-res virtual reality • Ars Technica

Kyle Orland:


HTC’s higher-resolution Vive Pro, first announced back in January, is setting new records for the price of a mass-market virtual reality headset. In pre-orders starting today ahead of planned April 5 shipments, customers will have to shell out $799 for the improved Vive Pro headset, a price that does not include any controllers or Lighthouse tracking base stations.

While the original Vive also cost $799 when it launched nearly two years ago, that package included two controllers and the two tracking stations necessary for un-occluded, room-scale VR. Existing HTC Vive owners will be able to reuse those accessories if and when they upgrade to the Vive Pro headset. New users, however, will currently have to purchase them à la carte (an HTC representative tells Ars that pricing for a separate “full kit” Vive Pro package will be announced soon).

HTC currently sells Vive controllers for $130 each and tracking base stations for $135 each. That means new Vive Pro customers will have to pay $1,330 for a higher-fidelity version of the same basic hardware included in the package for the original Vive (which is being reduced to $499 today, from the $599 price it has held since last April).

While the Vive and Vive Pro both technically work with other controllers (including some competing motion-tracked options), the vast majority of Vive-compatible VR software is designed to work with the hand-tracking “wand” controllers that have been a standard part of the Vive package since launch. At least one tracking base station is required to follow the Vive headset as a user moves their head, though two are recommended for more “room-scale” applications.


I think I’d argue with that phrase “mass-market virtual reality headset”. There is no mass market for VR headsets at present – and there’s still no obvious sign of what would spark wide adoption. (This isn’t, of course, good news for HTC. But these days, pretty much nothing is.)
link to this extract

Apple likely to buy up to 270 million smartphone panels in 2018 • Digitimes

Rebecca Kuo and Steve Shen:


Apple’s purchases of OLED panels in 2018 will reach 110-130m units, including 70-80m 5.9in units for the current iPhone X and an upgraded version of the same size. The remaining will be 40-50n 6.5in OLED panels for the production of a less expensive model, said the sources.

Apple will also take up a total of 60-70m 6.1in all-screen LTPS panels for another new iPhone model to be released in fall 2018, as well as 60-70m LTPS panels in 4-, 4.7- and 5.5in sizes for the production of iPhone 8 devices, iPhone SE and iPhone 7, indicated the sources.

Samsung Display will continue to serve as the primary supplier of OLED panels to Apple, according to IHS Markit. However, LG Display will strive to become the second supplier in the second half of 2018, aiming to secure orders for the new 6.5in OLED model to be launched this fall.

On the other hand, Japan Display, Sharp and LG Display will be the main suppliers of LTPS panels to Apple in 2018, said the sources.


So the expectation – if this is right – is that the larger “X” model will sell 40-50m units in a single quarter (given that Apple releases close to calendar Q4)? Or that those purchases will carry it across into the first quarter of 2019 as well, which would make a lot more sense.
link to this extract

Apple is secretly developing its own screens for the first time • Bloomberg

Mark Gurman:


Apple is designing and producing its own device displays for the first time, using a secret manufacturing facility near its California headquarters to make small numbers of the screens for testing purposes, according to people familiar with the situation.

The technology giant is making a significant investment in the development of next-generation MicroLED screens, say the people, who requested anonymity to discuss internal planning. MicroLED screens use different light-emitting compounds than the current OLED displays and promise to make future gadgets slimmer, brighter and less power-hungry.

The screens are far more difficult to produce than OLED displays, and the company almost killed the project a year or so ago, the people say. Engineers have since been making progress and the technology is now at an advanced stage, they say, though consumers will probably have to wait a few years before seeing the results.

The ambitious undertaking is the latest example of Apple bringing the design of key components in-house. The company has designed chips powering its mobile devices for several years. Its move into displays has the long-term potential to hurt a range of suppliers, from screen makers like Samsung Electronics Co., Japan Display Inc., Sharp Corp. and LG Display Co. to companies like Synaptics Inc. that produce chip-screen interfaces. It may also hurt Universal Display Corp., a leading developer of OLED technology.


Back in October 2017 I linked to a Digitimes story which said


Through acquiring US-based LuxVue Technology, Apple has acquired patented micro LED technology, especially that for mass transfer. In February 2017, Apple acquired a patent of fingerprint recogniton on micro LED panels via LuxVue, signaling Apple’s continued R&D of micro LED technology. But some reports have claimed that Apple, after LuxVue encountered bottlenecks in mass transfer, has withdrawn some of its technological staff working at a micro LED lab in northern Taiwan.


Seems like they may have got past the bottlenecks. But don’t hold your breath. Even so, it’s a classic example of Apple seeking to control the technologies that it depends on, from fingerprints to facial recognition to processors to modems. Only surprising that screens should have taken so long, really.

link to this extract

11 different brands of AA batteries, tested in identical flashlights. [OC] : dataisbeautiful • Reddit

The graphic seems to tell the obvious story – but, as commenters then point out, if you really want to know what you’re getting for your money, you need to look at the price per hour. That, it turns out, doesn’t go in line with the graph.
link to this extract

How has the average Hollywood movie crew changed? • Stephen Follows

Follows works in the film industry and (if you didn’t know) in his spare time does some wonderful analyses of public data from it:


In the past, I’ve looked at how big a movie crew can get, for both UK films and Hollywood movies. But I was recently asked by a reader how the composition of such crews has changed over time. Which departments are getting larger? Which jobs are on the rise and which are waning?

To answer this, I looked at the credits of the top 200 US-grossing movies of each of the past 20 years (1997-2016), giving me a dataset of 4,000 movies.


You can probably guess the department that’s grown biggest and fastest (clue: it’s not stunt actors), but some of the others are surprising.
link to this extract

Amazon Alexa meets music composed by AI in DeepMusic • RAIN News

After yesterday’s request for a sample of that Amazon Alexa AI-generated music, reader Alex Barredo points us to this, by Anna Washenko:


The AI compositions are generated from a collection of audio samples and a neural network. None of the music has received post-production editing by a human. If you listen on an Echo Show or Echo Spot speaker, you’ll also see artwork created by AI.

Given the number of services working to aid with the speed and ease of Alexa skill creation, it’s likely that we’ll be seeing a wave of innovative and creative applications of the voice technology. AI-made music is likely just the start of how people will think to take advantage of smart speakers.

Here’s what it sounds like:

Possibly not Grammy caliber, but interesting.


I can see endless possibilities for Muzak and Spotify playlists in this.
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

Beware taking your Mac running High Sierra to the Genius Bar: APFS might surprise them

“Your Mac. On top”, according to the caption. But it might also be a source of confusion at the Genius Bar. Photo by tua ulamac on Flickr.

I wrote a while back about the problems I had with my 2012 retina MacBook Pro, and its strange shutdowns – which I suspected, but couldn’t absolutely prove, were due to the graphics card problem that these models have been known to suffer from: when the discrete graphics card was activated, there was a chance it would go completely off the rails.

Finally it shut down and didn’t seem to want to start. At that point, I turned over to using the iPad Pro full-time, which is another story. You might find it entertaining.

The only way to absolutely prove that the problem with the computer was the graphics card, of course, was to take it to a Genius Bar. After eventually getting an appointment (the Mac Geniuses are rare, compared to the iPhone/iPad Geniuses), I turned up with the rMBP which I’d left for dead.

“It was dead, honest”

Of course the first thing it did when the guy plugged it in was to start up and happily proceed to the login screen. Talk about embarrassing. I logged in. All seemed OK. But we were there for a Genius appointment, so we were going to do that. He restarted, booted from a network drive which has Apple’s Mac OS9-style hardware test, and gave it a once-over.

Mac OS 9: if you take your Mac to get Geniused, you’ll probably see a screen that looks something like this. Photo by Rodrigo Vera on Flickr.

(That’s OS9. It’s not what my machine looked like, except for how the progress bar looked.)

The checks all looked OK, except for the VST – video system test. That didn’t work – it said it couldn’t find the relevant drivers (which it looked for on the hard drive). So he ran Disk Utility off the network drive to see whether there was something wrong with the hard drive. (rMBPs from that time all have SSDs.).

At this point things got very confusing. Disk Utility showed that there were two drives – an SSD with 500GB capacity, and another also with 500GB capacity. One of them seemed to be called Macintosh HD, and the other seemed to have partitions such as “private” and “mem”.

Except that the rMBP only had a 500GB SSD. How had it got two? “Have you got a Fusion drive in here?” the Genius asked.

Me (cooperative citizen pulled over by policeman): “Er.. no.”

At this point the Genius said he suspected there was something wrong with my SSD. So he restarted the machine, held down the key to boot from a network drive, whizzed over to the one marked 10.12 and started up. Could Disk Utility read my drive now? No, it couldn’t.

“Do you have this backed up?” he asked, indicating the computer. I sure did – SuperDuper clones, and a Time Machine backup. “I think we might need to reinstall the operating system.”

(This is the point at which the smart readers are saying “ohhhh” because they’ve spotted the mistake that both he and I made.)

“You backed it up, of course?”

So yes, it was time to wipe the drive and reinstall everything. Thankfully the Wi-Fi in Apple Stores is really fast, so you can get your OS reinstalled quickly. Everything seemed to be going fine. I hung around, knowing that all the important stuff was backed up either in the cloud or on the backup disk. For fun, because I knew that it would take forever on our super-slow broadband, I decided to re-download my iCloud Photo library. All 16,800 or so of them. Look, the Wi-Fi’s free.

The photo download was fast. Everything seemed to be fine. The machine wasn’t crashing. I was now starting to question myself: was it really just something scuzzy on the hard drive?

Then, fatefully, I tried to look at a photo that had downloaded at full resolution. Click on the photo, it begins to fill the screen, and––

BAM. The machine shut down, just like that. It had been nothing to do with the hard drive or the OS. As I thought, whenever the discrete graphics card was called on to do something, it knocked the machine out.

Some more consultation, and another Genius. More network booting, and this time the video test seemed to indicate that, ehhhh, the video card might not be in good shape.

At this point I suddenly realised why the network-booted versions hadn’t been able to run the video card drivers from my hard drive, and now they could. The network drives were formatted with HFS+, which is the file system Apple has been using on Mac OSX (and MacOS) for a couple of decades. That’s why the version number on the network drive was 10.12 – the file format for Sierra.

13 is the magic number (it makes stuff disappear)

High Sierra! It was staring us in the face. Sorta.

But I had brought the machine in running 10.13 – High Sierra – which uses the APFS filesystem. APFS brings a number of benefits, such as “instant” file copying, disk space saving, better encryption performance, inherent SSD trim, and faster boot times, but it isn’t back-compatible with HFS+; if you boot from an HFS+ drive, it won’t be able to read a file encoded in APFS. (APFS can work read HFS+, of course.)

That, of course, is why the Genius’s HFS+-encoded 10.12 network drive couldn’t understand my APFS-encoded SSD. So I’d wiped the hard drive for nothing. If there had been an APFS-encoded network drive, it could have booted up the machine and run the video test and found the problem. (Well, probably.)

Anyhow – they took the machine in and replaced the entire logic board, and they did it under the guarantee (even though that had run out a little while earlier). In my case, the problem had gotten much worse after I got the battery replaced in November 2017; possibly doing that disturbed the logic board and the card’s connections, and led to a cascade of trouble.

When I got home, there was an email waiting for me from Apple – the standard “how did we do?” questionnaire. I had by then realised what had happened, and so I filled it in, explaining that they needed to update their procedures to take High Sierra/APFS users into account. I got a followup phone call from the Apple Store where I’d taken my machine, and they sounded interested and honestly grateful for the feedback. So this has possibly already been implemented. (I mean, you’d hope, right?)

Problem mostly solved

So what’s the solution? Apple obviously needs to implement some network drives formatted with APFS. Which might mean an overhaul of how it does some stuff in-store; but it should expect that there are going to be more and more people coming in with machines that are APFS-encoded.

As for me – I came home with a machine that was fixed; it’s got a new battery (since November) and now a totally new logic board. What’s really nice is how clean the machine is. All the dust and crumbs and fingermarks are blown and cleaned off. It’s like getting a brand-new machine. (I think they may even have replaced my letter “A”, which had taken a lot of punishment over the past five and a bit years.)

Getting the hard drive back to status quo ante took an afternoon or so. The one thing that’s not working? Can’t get my old Time Machine drive (which is of course HFS+ because Time Machine hasn’t moved forward to APFS yet) to believe that the new machine is essentially the same one. If I try to run a backup, it thinks for 12 hours or so (it’s not an SSD backup drive) and then declares that it’s going to need vast tracts of storage. I’ve tried command-line invocations (yes, I’ve read the manual for tmutil) without success. Strangely, I am apparently able to restore files from the drive; I just can’t put fresh ones onto it.

But that’s not a huge problem, because I have hardly any files that live exclusively on my Mac – doing so seems like a liability, and a self-inflicted handicap in these days of cloud synchronisation via iCloud and Dropbox – and the very few that there are can be handled by SuperDuper!, which does bootable backups (yes, even of APFS).

Back to my Mac

Oh sure, you’re wondering: what’s it like being back on the Mac after weeks exclusively on the iPad? Three key things: it’s damn heavy; I can type a bit faster; the screen (15in) is really big, which makes it feel like all the fonts are gigantic and yet can fit stuff onto the screen.

More generally, I find it easier to get distracted on the Mac. There are pings from emails, there’s the time spent waiting for the newsreader to load articles or web pages to load, during which one may decide to go and look at another app (email, Twitter) and get lost in that, breaking the flow of whatever I was doing before. I’m much more focussed when working on the iPad – I can go most of a day without looking at email, which is how I like things to be, unless it’s VIP email, in which case I get pinged. Also, I don’t get spinning beachballs on the iPad. Sure, it’s newer and it’s doing less simultaneous processing, but even so, as a user interface experience, Beachballs Are Bad, and one notices them even more when returning from a platform where you never, ever see them.

But anyhow, if your Mac does break down, and you’re on High Sierra, make sure to tell them if you’re on APFS when they come to the diagnostics. And if they tell you that you need to wipe your drive and start again, just make sure to ask them: “are you certain it’s that, or could it be your network drive can’t read the APFS file system on my machine?” It can’t hurt to ask.

Start Up: Cambridge Analytica in hot water, Alexa’s deep (AI) music, YouTube Kids joins the info wars, and more

Mattress reviews online are replacing sales people in stores. But not for the better. Photo by Sameer Vasta on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 13 links for you. “I’m.. working on a blockchain gang”. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

DeepMusic Alexa skill serves up AI-generated songs • MusicAlly

Stuart Dredge:


Amid all the industry conversation about how smart speakers will affect the way people listen to music, the assumption has been that the music in question will be made by humans.

Here’s a new Alexa skill to make you think, though. It’s called DeepMusic, and has just launched for Alexa-powered devices like the Echo speakers.

“DeepMusic is an Alexa skill that enables you to listen to songs generated by artificial intelligence (AI). Each song was composed entirely using AI. The songs were generated using a collection of audio samples and a deep recurrent neural network. There has been no post-production editing by a human,” explains its description on Amazon’s store.

AI was also used to create the artwork shown on the screen-equipped Echo Show and Echo Spot speakers. The skill can be tested by saying ‘Alexa, open DeepMusic’ and then commands like ‘Alexa, ask DeepMusic to play a song’.


We’ve had quite a few “AI music” links over the past few years. There was in August 2016, an AI-generated song in November 2016, and DeepBach in December 2016. If anyone wants to let us know how DeepMusic sounds, we’d love a review.
link to this extract

To find suspects, Raleigh police quietly turn to Google •

Tyler Dukes, WRAL public records reporter:


In the early morning hours of June 1, 2015, witnesses heard Pugh in an argument. They heard multiple gunshots. And they saw a figure illuminate the ground with a cell phone flashlight before fleeing the scene as the sun rose over north Raleigh.

A year and a half later across town, a taxi driver named Nwabu Efobi was gunned down in front of the Universal Cab Company. Security camera video caught Efobi in some kind of confrontation with the shooter before the unknown man opened fire. The day before, cameras caught the same guy several times walking around the building with what appeared to be a cell phone at his ear.

Raleigh police say the cases are unrelated. But in March 2017, months after investigations began into both shootings, separate detectives on each case, one day apart, employed an innovative strategy in criminal investigations.

On a satellite image, they drew shapes around the crime scenes, marking the coordinates on the map. Then they convinced a Wake County judge they had enough probable cause to order Google to hand over account identifiers on every single cell phone that crossed the digital cordon during certain times.

In at least four investigations last year – cases of murder, sexual battery and even possible arson at the massive downtown fire in March 2017 – Raleigh police used search warrants to demand Google accounts not of specific suspects, but from any mobile devices that veered too close to the scene of a crime, according to a WRAL News review of court records.


Two things: first, the idea of a “public records reporter” wouldn’t exist in the UK; they’re either incredibly hard to access, or trivial. Second, why only Google? What if there were iPhone users who didn’t use Google services in the area?
link to this extract

The online mattress industry promised a more honest shopping experience. We may have gotten the opposite instead • Recode

Jason Del Rey:


Gone is the slick-talking store sales guy directing you toward the mattress with the best profit margin or the highest commission. But in his place are a slew of website owners proficient in the art of search engine marketing, funneling you with the help of Google toward the mattress that lines their pockets the most.

These sites make money from so-called affiliate fees — commissions earned when a reader clicks a link in a review and goes on to purchase that mattress afterward. This model has been around almost as long as the internet. But the rise of online mattress sellers has created a perfect recipe for these content chefs: a high-priced item that results in a large commission, coupled with a heavy consumer reliance on reviews, since many of these new mattress brands are not widely sold in physical stores.

The power these websites amassed has not gone unnoticed in the industry. After Casper sued three of the sites, the high-profile mattress company financed the takeover of one of them, called Sleepopolis. This raised questions about a conflict of interest when Sleepopolis’ review of Casper suddenly improved. Today, Sleepopolis sends more traffic to Casper’s website than to any other mattress brand, according to data from SimilarWeb.


You might recall this amazing story about Sleepopolis and Casper and the whole crazy setup from October 2017. Another example of “the internet will improve it all” not coming true.
link to this extract

A cyberattack in Saudi Arabia had a deadly goal. Experts fear another try • The New York Times

Nicole Perlroth and Clifford Krauss:


In August, a petrochemical company with a plant in Saudi Arabia was hit by a new kind of cyberassault. The attack was not designed to simply destroy data or shut down the plant, investigators believe. It was meant to sabotage the firm’s operations and trigger an explosion.

The attack was a dangerous escalation in international hacking, as faceless enemies demonstrated both the drive and the ability to inflict serious physical damage. And United States government officials, their allies and cybersecurity researchers worry that the culprits could replicate it in other countries, since thousands of industrial plants all over the world rely on the same American-engineered computer systems that were compromised.

Investigators have been tight-lipped about the August attack. They still won’t identify the company or the country where it is based and have not identified the culprits.

But the attackers were sophisticated and had plenty of time and resources, an indication that they were most likely supported by a government, according to more than a dozen people, including cybersecurity experts who have looked into the attack and asked not to be identified because of the confidentiality of the continuing investigation.

The only thing that prevented an explosion was a mistake in the attackers’ computer code, the investigators said…

…What worries investigators and intelligence analysts the most is that the attackers compromised Schneider’s Triconex controllers, which keep equipment operating safely by performing tasks like regulating voltage, pressure and temperatures. Those controllers are used in about 18,000 plants around the world, including nuclear and water treatment facilities, oil and gas refineries, and chemical plants.

“If attackers developed a technique against Schneider equipment in Saudi Arabia, they could very well deploy the same technique here in the United States,” said James A. Lewis, a cybersecurity expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank.


Most likely to be Iranian hackers. Second-tier nation-state hackers are now as big a problem as the top tier; they just don’t hit as many targets.

link to this extract

University of Arizona tracks student ID cards to detect who might drop out • The Verge

Shannon Liao:


The University of Arizona is tracking freshman students’ ID card swipes to anticipate which students are more likely to drop out. University researchers hope to use the data to lower dropout rates. (Dropping out refers to those who have left higher-education entirely and those who transfer to other colleges.)

The card data tells researchers how frequently a student has entered a residence hall, library, and the student recreation center, which includes a salon, convenience store, mail room, and movie theater. The cards are also used for buying vending machine snacks and more, putting the total number of locations near 700. There’s a sensor embedded in the CatCard student IDs, which are given to every student attending the university.

“By getting their digital traces, you can explore their patterns of movement, behavior and interactions, and that tells you a great deal about them,” Sudha Ram, a professor of management information systems who directs the initiative, said in a press release.

Researchers have gathered freshman data over a three-year time frame so far, and they found that their predictions for who is more likely to drop out are 73% accurate.


Big data brother is everywhere.
link to this extract

‘I created Steve Bannon’s psychological warfare tool’: meet the data war whistleblower • The Observer

Carole Cadwalldr:


What the email correspondence between Cambridge Analytica employees and [Aleksandr] Kogan shows is that Kogan had collected millions of profiles in a matter of weeks. But neither Wylie nor anyone else at Cambridge Analytica had checked that it was legal. It certainly wasn’t authorised. Kogan did have permission to pull Facebook data, but for academic purposes only. What’s more, under British data protection laws, it’s illegal for personal data to be sold to a third party without consent.

“Facebook could see it was happening,” says Wylie. “Their security protocols were triggered because Kogan’s apps were pulling this enormous amount of data, but apparently Kogan told them it was for academic use. So they were like, ‘Fine’.”

Kogan maintains that everything he did was legal and he had a “close working relationship” with Facebook, which had granted him permission for his apps.

Cambridge Analytica had its data. This was the foundation of everything it did next – how it extracted psychological insights from the “seeders” and then built an algorithm to profile millions more.

For more than a year, the reporting around what Cambridge Analytica did or didn’t do for Trump has revolved around the question of “psychographics”, but Wylie points out: “Everything was built on the back of that data. The models, the algorithm. Everything. Why wouldn’t you use it in your biggest campaign ever?”

In December 2015, the Guardian’s Harry Davies published the first report about Cambridge Analytica acquiring Facebook data and using it to support Ted Cruz in his campaign to be the US Republican candidate. But it wasn’t until many months later that Facebook took action. And then, all they did was write a letter. In August 2016, shortly before the US election, and two years after the breach took place, Facebook’s lawyers wrote to [data whistleblower Christopher] Wylie, who left Cambridge Analytica in 2014, and told him the data had been illicitly obtained and that “GSR was not authorised to share or sell it”. They said it must be deleted immediately.

“I already had. But literally all I had to do was tick a box and sign it and send it back, and that was it,” says Wylie. “Facebook made zero effort to get the data back.”


Facebook staff and ex-staff have been saying: 1) not a data breach as such (a headline on another of these stories) 2) this stuff doesn’t affect anyone anyway. The second isn’t believable. Are we meant to think advertising has no effect? If that were the case, nobody would do it.
link to this extract

Followup questions For Facebook, Cambridge Analytica and Trump Campaign on massive breach • Just Security

Justin Hendrix:


Journalists, regulatory bodies and Congress should be ready to ask a number of pressing questions to get to the bottom of exactly what happened. The answers are important- governments around the world are considering how best to regulate technology companies, and this extraordinary incident gets to the heart of the relationship between personal data, microtargeting, dark money and the impact of their combination with unaccountable platforms on the health of democracies.

Here are seven key questions:
[with the explanation removed, here are the questions:]
1. Why did Facebook take more than two years to inform the public of this massive breach?
2. Did the Trump campaign or Cambridge Analytica violate campaign finance laws?
3. Did Trump campaign or Cambridge Analytica employees lie to Congress, or to the British Parliament?
4. Did Facebook’s failure to disclose this breach to the public and notify its directly affected consumers break any laws?
5. Did any of the Facebook embeds in the Trump campaign know that stolen data was being used for targeting?
6. Did Facebook have evidence its own employees mishandled this situation? Was any disciplinary action taken?
7. Did other organizations or individuals exploit these apparent weaknesses, and are there other breaches we do not know about?


Question 3 is already being followed up.
link to this extract

Facebook bans Trump campaign’s data analytics firm for taking user data • The Washington Post

Elizabeth Dwoskin:


Facebook said Kogan had requested and gained access to information from 270,000 Facebook members after they chose to download his app. The app, “thisisyourdigitallife,” offered a personality prediction and billed itself on Facebook as “a research app used by psychologists.”

The Facebook members gave their consent for Kogan to access information such as the city they set on their profile, the content they had liked and some limited information about friend groups and contacts. Kogan then broke Facebook’s policies and passed the information to Cambridge Analytica and to Wylie. Facebook learned about Kogan’s activities in 2015.

The company removed Kogan’s app at the time and demanded certifications from Cambridge Analytica, Wylie and Kogan that the information he had shared had been destroyed. All three certified to Facebook that they had done so, but Facebook said it received reports several days ago that the data was not deleted.


“The horse bolted two years ago but to indicate our displeasure we are definitely shutting this stable door.” Also amusing: where the reports came from. It then threatened to sue one of the sources (The Observer) of those reports.
link to this extract

YouTube suggested conspiracy videos to children using its Kids app • Business Insider

James Cook:


YouTube’s app specifically for children is meant to filter out adult content and provide a “world of learning and fun,” but Business Insider found that YouTube Kids featured many conspiracy theory videos which make claims that the world is flat, that the moon landing was faked, and that the planet is ruled by reptile-human hybrids.

YouTube Kids is a separate app from the main YouTube app, and it’s meant to allow parents to let their children browse YouTube without being worried about any unsuitable content appearing. Children are encouraged to learn languages, read books, and watch educational videos.

Search for “UFO” on YouTube Kids and you’ll mostly find videos of toys that are clearly fine for children to watch. But one of the top videos claimed to show a UFO shooting at a chemtrail, and we found several videos by prominent conspiracy theorist David Icke in the suggested videos. YouTube removed the videos from YouTube Kids after we contacted it about the issue.

One suggested video was an hours-long lecture by Icke in which he claims that aliens built the pyramids, that the planet is run by reptile-human hybrids, that Freemasons engage in human sacrifice, that the assassination of President Kennedy was planned by the US government, and that humans would evolve in 2012.


With enough examples, is it possible that Google will actually take action before rather than after this happens? Except it’s been evident for ages that YouTube Kids is a complete mess. This just shows that it’s even worse than all those algorithmically-generated junk weird videos.

And boring though it might be to repeat this, kids brought up on the Encyclopaedia Britannica didn’t come across David Icke or moon landing conspiracies.
link to this extract

A quick (battle) field guide to the new culture wars • Ribbonfarm

Venkatesh Rao:


I haven’t yet gathered my thoughts on this whole theme properly, besides drawing my map, but I did tweet a bunch yesterday (March 5), throwing out some initial thoughts on the culture wars topic. I’m compiling them here.

The overarching theme of these tweets is this: there is a war on, and except for the low level of actual killing, it is a real war, not an allegorical or metaphoric one. The most visible battlefields are online forums like Twitter, Facebook, and various well-connected regions of the blogosphere. But there is also plenty of old-school direct action on the streets, in traditional media outlets, and behind closed doors.

The combatants include professional cyberwarriors and seasoned amateur guerrillas pursuing very well-defined objectives with military precision and specialized tools. Then there is the small but highly skilled corps of shitposters whose skill at information warfare is matched only by their fundamental incomprehension of the real damage they’re unleashing for lulz. And finally, masses of clueless patsies being programmed like insect swarms by all sides. What Renee DiResta labeled always-on mobs in her post last year.

In other words, there is a war on, it’s very real, causing real pain to many, and involves huge consequences hanging in the balance, from the future of academia and the conduct of science to the future of the planet itself.

Believe it or not, the swinging of a presidential election is actually a fairly minor chapter in the ongoing saga. When it’s all done and over with, and the dust has settled somewhat, I believe we’ll look back on this era as being as consequential in reshaping the future of the United States and the world as the Civil War.


This is a deeply fascinating post by Rao, and really obligatory reading if you are on social media at all. His comment on conspiracy theorists – they aren’t going to go away, and you might as well treat them as being from a parallel universe (I paraphrase) is worth the time in itself.

It’s also a concerning post. But knowing you’re in the midst of an infowar is perhaps the most useful information you can have.
link to this extract

Beyond the bitcoin bubble, the benefits of blockchain • Allianz Global Investors

Stefan Hofrichter is head of global economics and strategy at Allianz:


bitcoin ticks all of the boxes that we consider to be essential criteria of any asset bubble:

• “New-era” thinking. Bitcoin is perceived to be an entirely new kind of currency and a monetary innovation in the internet age.
• Overtrading. Trading volumes have increased by almost fivefold in the last five years, according to BIS data.
• Ultra-easy monetary conditions. Accommodative policy is still in place globally, despite a series of rate hikes by the US Federal Reserve.
• A lack of financial regulation. The “Wild West” bitcoin environment is only gradually being addressed by regulators around the world.
• The launch of related financial instruments. New products related to the bubbling asset class are popping up – from CBOE and CME futures contracts to the launch of “ICOs” (initial coin offerings).
• Rising leverage. Not only has private-sector leverage increased to record highs globally, but leveraged speculation in bitcoin is increasing.
• Swindles. Bitcoin has become the instrument of choice for many criminals, thanks to its ability to exist entirely outside of traditional banking channels.
• Significant overvaluation. Many other asset classes are pricey in today’s market, but bitcoin’s valuation seems to be without peer.

This brings us to a key question: what is the fair value of a bitcoin? In our view, its intrinsic value must be zero: a bitcoin is a claim on nobody – in contrast to, for instance, sovereign bonds, equities or paper money – and it does not generate any income stream.


Well this won’t be popular with the bitcoin miners.
link to this extract

Sierra Leone tests blockchain technology for tallying election results •

Daniel Finnan:


Sierra Leone has become one of the first countries to trial the use of blockchain technology during elections. A Swiss-based company called Agora used technology similar to that underpinning the BitCoin cryptocurrency to provide a partial count of election results. Sierra Leone went to the polls on 7 March to elect a new president, members of parliament, local councillors and mayors.

“We recorded the votes after tallying on our blockchain where the votes are anonymised,” Leonardo Gammar, the Chief Executive Officer of Agora, told RFI. “Our observers have a look at the ballots and they send the results on our blockchain per polling station,” he added.

The Agora e-voting system aims to provide a decentralised system that is both transparent and verifiable, according to Gammar. Blockchain technology emerged with the creation of Bitcoin and is a digital ledger of records much like a traditional database, except that it is encrypted and stored across several computers.

“Our goal is to provide voting solutions for people, electronic voting solutions, but decentralised,” said Gammar, during a telephone interview. “In Sierra Leone, what we did is just a use case and it’s not the full implementation of our digital solution.”

Agora aims to provide a full e-voting system from voter identification to the actual casting of ballots and counting of results in the future, Gammar said.

Agora’s voting app will be linked to this implementation of blockchain technology and will provide additional features, the Agora co-founder said. One such feature would help avoid electoral fraud such as vote buying. The app would enable voters to record their choice in the election when under pressure from unscrupulous actors, but change the vote to their desired choice at a later time, as long as the poll is still open.


That last bit is clear as mud. Also: if people are being pressured to sell their votes and there’s a public tally of how many votes there were for something.. that doesn’t seem good? And it doesn’t seem as though it changes the circumstance that existed before: either the vote-buyer could come into the voting booth and watch, or they had to take it on trust. (This is e-voting, so the risk of vote-buying being enforced seems bigger than if you have voting booths.)

This seems like a buzzword solution; encrypting the ledger and storing it on multiple computers is what any organisation that handles distributed logins does for its passwords. It does, though, have the benefit that there’s a hard-to-dispute distributed tally of recorded votes.
link to this extract

Truth isn’t the problem—we are • WSJ

Rebecca Newberger Goldstein on how “post-truth” is more about allegiance than truth:


Consider two different propositions, from opposite ends of American politics: (1) “The only way to stop violent crime is to allow citizens to arm themselves,” and (2) “For a person of privilege to make creative use of the culture of the underprivileged is an act of aggression and abuse.” The information that we can glean from these statements isn’t about the putative topics—gun control or cultural “appropriation,” respectively. It’s about the political identity of the speaker. Such assertions are tribal banners, and offering counter-evidence isn’t likely to get you very far.

Indeed, a pledge of political allegiance achieves greater authenticity if it flies in the face of counter-evidence, especially if that evidence comes from “so-called experts.” My insistence that “Human actions have no impact on global warming” gains immeasurably, as a pledge, from the fact that 97% of climate scientists disagree with me; it highlights the depth of my commitment to the cause. Similarly, to show my solidarity with others who wish to ban “Frankenstein” foods, I can insist that “Genetically engineered crops are unsafe for humans and animals,” even as I’m presented with an exhaustive study by the National Academies of Science concluding that there is no such evidence.

These pseudo-assertions aren’t just tribal markers, of course. They also purport to say what is and isn’t true. And that’s where we get into trouble—in the very fact that their persuasive potency, as pledges, is often a function of how far they depart from the best available evidence.

Democratic debate is never a strict weighing of evidence; emotional appeals to party, cause and country are always part of the mix. But our readiness today to proudly defy evidence is very troubling. It undermines our commitment to the truth—and our capacity to reach any sort of middle ground or consensus.


It generally seems to me that the problem in the US is the lack of a middle ground in politics. One counter to that has been the recent upsets in which Democrats have won with huge poll swings – but they’re in effect obliged to be middle-of-the-road to appeal to potential swing voters. If they can hang on, America might find itself inching back toward consensus through democratic (small d) means.
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Start Up: the Spotify playlist black market, how Siri soured, who’ll wear WearOS?, Toys’R’Us bust, and more

These guys will probably get their contract renewed. Photo by Elliott Brown on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 10 links for you. Use them wisely. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Exclusive: Amazon’s internal numbers on Prime Video, revealed • Reuters

Jeffrey Dastin:


a person familiar with its strategy said the company credits a specific show for luring someone to start or extend a Prime subscription if that program is the first one a customer streams after signing up. That metric, referenced throughout the documents, is known as a “first stream.”

The company then calculates how expensive the viewer was to acquire by dividing the show’s costs by the number of first streams it had. The lower that figure, the better.

The internal documents do not show how long subscribers stayed with Prime, nor do they indicate how much shopping they do on Amazon. The company reviews other metrics for its programs as well. Consequently, the documents do not provide enough information to determine the overall profitability of Amazon’s Hollywood endeavor.

Still, the numbers indicate that broad-interest shows can lure Prime members cheaply by Amazon’s calculations. One big winner was the motoring series “The Grand Tour,” which stars the former presenters of BBC’s “Top Gear.” The show had more than 1.5 million first streams from Prime members worldwide, at a cost of $49 per subscriber in its first season.

The documents seen by Reuters reflect Prime subscribers in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Austria and Japan, where Amazon’s programs were available before Prime Video rolled out globally in December 2016.

Analysts estimate that 75 million or more customers have Prime subscriptions worldwide, including about half of all households in the United States.

About 26 million US Prime members watched television and movies on Amazon as of early 2017. Reuters calculated this number from the documents, which showed how many viewers a TV series had as a percentage of total Prime Video customers.

Rival Netflix Inc had twice that many US subscribers in the first quarter of last year. It does not disclose how many were active viewers.


Those numbers for Grand Tour perhaps aren’t surprising, but they’ll be very reassuring for Clarkson et al.
link to this extract

Graphics that look hand-drawn • Rough.js


Rough.js is a light weight (~8k), Canvas based library that lets you draw in a sketchy, hand-drawn-like, style. The library defines primitives to draw lines, curves, arcs, polygons, circles, and ellipses. It also supports drawing SVG paths.


So it produces effects like this:

or this

link to this extract

Inside the black market for Spotify playlists • Daily Dot

Austin Powell:


Tommie King could be the next rapper to breakout from Atlanta. He’s well-connected, has obvious swagger, and he’s been quietly building a successful collection of singles on Spotify. His latest, “Eastside (feat. Cyhi the Prynce),” has already clocked more than 110,000 streams, driven largely by its placement on 14 independent playlists.

Gone are the days of hustling in parking lots, selling mixtapes out of the trunk of your car. In the modern music economy, in which streaming services account for nearly two-thirds of the total revenue generated by recorded music, emerging artists are increasingly being tracked via big data. Spotify streams, YouTube views, Twitter interactions, and even Wikipedia searches are all being used to discover the proverbial next big thing. That’s why King’s manager has worked to land his music on a staggering 594 Spotify playlists to date.

“Without Spotify playlists, to tell you the honest truth, I wouldn’t feel like we were accomplishing much,” King tells me when I reach him at the phone number he lists publicly on his Facebook page. “Streams are now the only way to really reach people you otherwise wouldn’t be able to connect with. It gives you the ability to be played worldwide, which we’re doing quite well with.

“That’s everything nowadays.”

There’s just one catch: King essentially paid to be added to those Spotify playlists… The black market for Spotify playlists is booming. It’s cheaper than you might expect to hack the system — and if it’s done right, it more than pays for itself.


Ironic: because they’re human-curated, the biggest playlists are targets for this. It’s the modern payola. (Millenial readers: like paid SEO for music on the radio.)
link to this extract

‘Snitches get stitches’: how secure phones for criminals are sold on Instagram • Motherboard

Joseph Cox:


On Saturday, Motherboard reported that the FBI has arrested the CEO of Phantom Secure, a company allegedly providing security-focused phones to international organized crime groups including the Sinaloa drug cartel. A key issue is whether Phantom deliberately created its product to help facilitate crime, which the criminal complaint alleges.

As it turns out, a Phantom-linked Instagram account, used mostly for marketing the company’s products, isn’t subtle when it comes to the organization’s alleged connection to crime; a brazen trend seen across the wider secure phone industry, too.

“Snitches get stitches,” one image, uploaded to Phantom PGP’s Instagram account, an apparent reseller of Phantom’s phones, reads. It is unclear whether this particular reseller or those operating other accounts advertising Phantom phones are connected to the recent charges against the main Phantom company and its owner.

Phantom and a number of other companies in this space sell customized BlackBerry or Android devices, typically with the camera and microphone removed, as well as, in Phantom’s case, the GPS-tracking and ordinary internet browsing functionality. In place of texts or phone calls, Phantom’s phones route encrypted messages through the company’s own infrastructure.


link to this extract

The seven-year itch: how Apple’s marriage to Siri turned sour • The Information

Aaron Tilley and Kevin McLaughlin:


The Topsy team [acquired by Apple in 2013] ultimately grew into a massive organization under Mr. Stasior that now nearly rivals the number of employees on the Siri team, said one former employee. Topsy CEO Vipul Ved Prakash continues to lead that search group and reports directly to Mr. Stasior.

Uniting the existing Siri team with the expanding search unit under Mr. Stasior proved troublesome. Members of the Topsy team expressed a reluctance to work with a Siri team they viewed as slow and bogged down by the initial infrastructure that had been patched up but never completely replaced since it launched.

“There was a feeling that, ‘Why don’t we just start over and build what we need to build, and then worry about reconciling those two later?’” said a former member of the search team. “They’re still reconciling it.”

Core Siri and Spotlight are powered by a combination of both Topsy’s technology and Siri Data Services, which is based on older search technology ported over from iTunes search but modified for Siri and launched in 2013, said the former employee. Siri Data Services deals with things like Wikipedia, stocks and movie showtimes, while Topsy sorts through Twitter, news and web results. The Siri Data Services team was eventually lumped into the Topsy team under Mr. Prakash with the plan to integrate all of the tech into a single stack. But they’re based on two different programming languages and are tricky to reconcile.

The difficulty integrating the search teams led to some embarrassing outcomes. Users could get completely different responses to the same question based on whether they were using Siri or Spotlight—which were powered by two different search technologies built by two different teams.


This verrry long piece indicates that there’s a hell of a lot of competing groups, and no overarching view of quite how to fix Siri – nor quite what it should be. We all know what we want Siri to do. But it seems like there are conflicting ideas on how to get there.
link to this extract

‘Hey’ used to be for horses • 500ish Words

MG Siegler:


Save for the Echo, each of these assistants is invoked by speaking the words “hey _____.” “Hey Google.” “Hey Siri.” “Hey Cortana.” With Amazon’s device, it’s simply “Alexa.”

Again, this seems like a tiny thing. It’s one syllable. But I think it matters.

I live in a house with both the Echo and the Home. And I’m always testing out Siri to see what she can and cannot do in relation to the competition. It’s just so much nicer to invoke Alexa than the others. And I’m certain a part of it is not having to add that extra wake word.

It also happens to be an awful word. Hey. Every time I hear it, I think back to growing up when my parents would make the dreadful parenting joke — which was really more of a reprimand. “‘Hey’ is for horses.” These days, we’re not only letting our children say “hey”, we’re basically forcing them to.
So I welcome the news that Microsoft is apparently doing away with “hey” for Cortana. And I hope Apple and Google follow suit. Sure, it may lead to a few more cases of accidental invoking, but I think the upside will be worth it.

Eventually, I imagine all of these devices are going to let you choose your own wake word. Yes, you can already change it on the Echo, but I mean picking something totally random personalized to you or your family.


I thought it was “OK Google” rather than “hey, Google” but the general point holds. And being able to personalise the wake word seems like a completely obvious setting, especially for privacy-conscious Apple: why should absolutely anybody be able to invoke my personal assistant just because they’re in speaking range?
link to this extract

Android Wear, it’s time for a new name • Google Blog

Dennis Troper was director of product management at Android Wear:


Android Wear was founded on the belief that wearable technology should be for everyone, no matter what style you wear on your wrist or what phone you have in your pocket. Since then, we’ve partnered with top watch and electronics brands to create more than 50 watches to help you manage your fitness, connect with the people who matter most, and show you the information you care about. The best part: We’re just scratching the surface of what’s possible with wearables and there’s even more exciting work ahead.

As our technology and partnerships have evolved, so have our users. In 2017, one out of three new Android Wear watch owners also used an iPhone. So as the watch industry gears up for another Baselworld next week, we’re announcing a new name that better reflects our technology, vision, and most important of all—the people who wear our watches. We’re now Wear OS by Google, a wearables operating system for everyone.


And now Troper is director of product management at Wear OS. That one-in-three figure is quite a number, but I don’t think this is going to change the trajectory of Android W–er, Wear OS. Sales are tiny compared to Apple Watch, and there’s no reason to think this will suddenly juice them.
link to this extract

The key to the iPhone X’s future lies in China • Forbes

Luke Kelly on prospects for the rumoured larger-screened iPhone X+1 later this year:


As per this report from IDC, China consumed 50% of the 437.4m so-called “phablets” shipped in 2016, and the country is expected to remain the largest market for large-screen smartphones.

“Chinese customers like bigger screens,” says Jia. “Close to 26% of smartphones shipped in Q4 2017 had 6in screens or larger, while this figure is just 10.7% in the U.S.” This phenomenon has led the larger “Plus” iPhone models to sell significantly better than their smaller siblings in China – the iPhone 7 Plus was the second best selling handset in China last year.

This is because many Chinese smartphone users own just one device, explains Zhang. “A smartphone is their only device to connect to the internet, so they want their smartphones to be as big as possible for playing games, multitasking and watching videos,” she explains.

Although this upcoming device could cost even more than the iPhone X, it seems clear that for China’s most affluent citizens, affordability is not an issue. Where American and European consumers have balked at the X’s $1,000 asking price, the Chinese market has no such qualms. With profit margins becoming ever-more crucial in a saturated smartphone market, it appears that China will be the key to the future of the iPhone X line.  


This is a really confused piece. He says sales of the iPhone X have “fallen well short of expectations”, except in China.. where people want bigger screens, which the X doesn’t have compared to the iPhone 8 Plus. Huh?

What seems clearer is that lots of people don’t have a handle on a) how many iPhone Xs Apple expected to sell in the last calendar quarter of 2017 b) how that would affect sales in C1Q 18 c) how many Xs Apple expected to sell across those two quarters, and hence how its demand profile might have shifted. (Sell more in 4Q17, sell fewer in 1Q18, but still hit overall target.)
link to this extract

Toys’R’Us to close all 800 of its US stores • Washington Post

Abha Bhattarai:


A group of toymakers led by Isaac Larian, chief executive of MGA Entertainment, the giant behind brands such as L.O.L. Surprise!, Little Tikes and Bratz, on Wednesday submitted a bid to buy Toys R Us’s Canadian arm, which includes 82 stores, according to Larian. He added that he is also looking into buying as many as 400 US stores, which he would seek to operate under the Toys R Us name.

“There is no toy business without Toys R Us,” Larian said, noting that he sold his first product to the chain in 1979. “It’s a big deal and I’m going to try to salvage as much of it as possible.”

According to its September bankruptcy filing, Toys R Us owes MGA Entertainment $21.3m.

Despite turnaround efforts at Toys R Us, which included adding more hands-on “play labs,” retail experts say the 60-year-old company has been unable to get customers back into its stores. It doesn’t offer the low prices or convenience of some of its larger competitors, nor the fun-filled experience that many smaller outfits do, some analysts have said.

Toys R Us, based in Wayne, N.J., has been struggling for years to pay down billions of dollars in debt as competitors such as Amazon, Walmart and Target win over an increasingly larger piece of the toy market. Its bankruptcy filing last year cited $7.9bn in debt against $6.6bn in assets. The company said it has more than 100,000 creditors, the largest of which are Bank of New York (owed $208m), Mattel ($136 m) and Hasbro ($59m).


A leveraged buyout in 2005 overloaded it with debt (both financial and, arguably, strategic). Now all that has come home to roost. Wonder if a buyer will try to rebrand it.
link to this extract

Power outage reportedly disrupts Samsung NAND flash production • Digitimes

Jessie Shen:


A brief power outage took place at Samsung Electronics’ NAND flash plant in Pyeongtaek on March 9. Wafers damaged in the incident are equivalent to 3.5% of the global supply in March, a report from Taiwan’s TechNews.

About 5,000-60,000 wafers were damaged during a half-hour power outage at the Samsung NAND flash fab, the report quoted market watchers as saying. The damaged wafers are equivalent to about 11% of Samsung’s overall NAND flash output in March.

Samsung’s sufficient inventory will be able to offset the wafer losses caused by the outage, which will have no major impact on Samsung’s NAND chip operations, the watchers were cited as saying in the report.


3.5% of global supply from one factory’s power outage. That’s some concentration of production.
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Start Up: upload that brain!, Apple Watch adoption, YouTube’s weird fact-checking plan, Google to stop crypto ads, and more

Elizabeth Holmes has been given a 10-year ban from being an officer or director of a public company. (All the photos of her look like this.) Photo by Digital Spy on Flickr.

A selection of 10 links for you. I can feel it going, Dave. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

A startup is pitching a mind-uploading service that is “100% fatal” • MIT Technology Review

Antonio Regalado:


The startup accelerator Y Combinator is known for supporting audacious companies in its popular three-month boot camp.

There’s never been anything quite like Nectome, though.

Next week, at YC’s “demo days,” Nectome’s cofounder, Robert McIntyre, is going to describe his technology for exquisitely preserving brains in microscopic detail using a high-tech embalming process. Then the MIT graduate will make his business pitch. As it says on his website: “What if we told you we could back up your mind?”

So yeah. Nectome is a preserve-your-brain-and-upload-it company. Its chemical solution can keep a body intact for hundreds of years, maybe thousands, as a statue of frozen glass. The idea is that someday in the future scientists will scan your bricked brain and turn it into a computer simulation. That way, someone a lot like you, though not exactly you, will smell the flowers again in a data server somewhere.

This story has a grisly twist, though. For Nectome’s procedure to work, it’s essential that the brain be fresh. The company says its plan is to connect people with terminal illnesses to a heart-lung machine in order to pump its mix of scientific embalming chemicals into the big carotid arteries in their necks while they are still alive (though under general anesthesia).


Money-back guarantee? And just when we’d got one sorted…
link to this extract

SEC charges Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes with fraud • WSJ

John Carreyrou:


Theranos founder and chief executive Elizabeth Holmes surrendered voting control of her blood-testing company, paid a $500,000 penalty and agreed to a 10-year ban from being an officer or director in a public company in settling civil-fraud charges Wednesday with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The settlement follows a more than two-year investigation by the SEC prompted by revelations in The Wall Street Journal. In October 2015, the Journal published an article revealing that Theranos used its proprietary blood-testing technology for only a fraction of the blood tests it offered in Walgreens stores. The article also reported that former employees were leery of the technology’s accuracy.

Theranos has since voided nearly one million test results, and Ms. Holmes agreed to a two-year federal ban from owning or operating laboratories. The company also has settled lawsuits from a hedge-fund investor and Walgreens, its former retail partner, alleging that it made misleading representations to them.

In addition to reaching a settlement with Ms. Holmes, the SEC is pursuing civil securities fraud charges in California against Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, Theranos’s former president and chief operating officer. Ms. Holmes and Mr. Balwani jointly ran the company for seven years before he retired in May 2016…

…“The Theranos story is an important lesson for Silicon Valley,” said Jina Choi, director of the SEC’s regional office in San Francisco, in a statement released Wednesday by the agency. “Innovators who seek to revolutionize and disrupt an industry must tell investors the truth about what their technology can do today, not just what they hope it might do someday.”


Carreyrou wrote the original story in October 2015 casting gigantic doubt over Theranos. At the time, Theranos was said to be worth $9bn. A win for journalism.
link to this extract

Apple Watch adoption • David Smith

Smith is an independent iOS deeloper


It seems like recently Apple has been more reticent to drop support for old hardware, but I hope that the pattern that we saw with the iPad might be repeated here. Where the first generation of the product was more quickly deprecated (2.5 years later in the case of the 1st Gen iPad). After that short lifespan for the first version, they then kept the second generation, iPad 2, supported for 5 years. The Series 1 & Series 2 watches would be a great baseline going forward. While not quite so fast as the Series 3, they are a mile ahead of the Series 0.

So far the data is looking promising that this dream of mine might actually be possible. The Series 3 is being adopted incredibly quickly and just last week became the most popular Apple Watch overall amongst my users with 33% of the overall user-base. The Series 0 is steadily falling, currently at around 24%.

I don’t know how low Apple would feel comfortable cutting off support for the Series 0, but it certainly seems like it is a possibility.

If I do some completely unscientific, wild, and almost certainly unreliable extrapolations of the current adoption trends (straight linear projection based on the trends since Christmas). It looks like by this fall, when presumably the next Apple Watch would be released and watchOS 5 will be generally available, the Series 0 may be as low as 15-20%.


I’d be amazed if the next version of WatchOS supports the Series 0. What that graph doesn’t depict is the expanding user base; the number of Series 0 users is probably pretty constant now, so the Series 3 users are really rocketing in numbers.
link to this extract

Google bans bitcoin adverts in cryptocurrency crackdown • The Guardian

Samuel Gibbs:


Google will ban all adverts for cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin and initial coin offerings (ICOs), as it seeks to “tackle emerging threats”.

The ad ban will come into force from June as part of a clampdown on unregulated financial products. Google’s director of sustainable ads, Scott Spencer, said in a blogpost: “We updated several policies to address ads in unregulated or speculative financial products like binary options, cryptocurrency, foreign exchange markets and contracts for difference (or CFDs).”

Google said its ban includes cryptocurrency exchanges and wallets. The company will also begin blocking some gambling ads, such as those for services using virtual items worth real-world money, known as skins betting, as it seeks to “combat new threats and improve the ads experience online”.

The move follows similar bans made by advertising rival Facebook, which banned all cryptocurrency and ICO adverts in January after finding that many were being used to scam potential investors.


What none of the stories about this explain is why they’re waiting until June to do it. It’s March now. That’s three months of jolly scamming for the jolly scammers, who will surely ramp up their efforts knowing there’s a deadline.
link to this extract

Raspberry Pi 3 B+ has faster CPU, Wi-Fi, and easier compliance testing • Ars Technica

Peter Bright:


The Raspberry Pi Foundation has announced a new version of its modular compute platform: the Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+.

The B+ has the same form factor and dimensions as the Pi 2 B and Pi 3 B, making it a drop-in replacement but with a better processor and connectivity. Compared to the Pi 3 B, the B+ adds many hundreds of MHz—it runs its quad core 64-bit Cortex-A53 processor at 1.4GHz, up from 1.2GHz—along with dual band 2.4/5GHz 802.11b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 4.2, up from 2.4GHz and Bluetooth 4.1.

The Ethernet port has been upgraded from 100Mb/s to what is technically gigabit; it syncs at gigabit speeds, but the actual Ethernet controller is only USB 2, so transfer rates are limited to about 300Mb/s.Other connections are unchanged, four USB 2 ports, a 40-pin GPIO connector, an HDMI video output, camera and touchscreen ports, stereo/composite video, and a microSD slot for its software and operating system. It uses the same 5V/2.5A power as before and will also support power-over-Ethernet with an accessory (coming soon) sold separately.

The faster processor and better networking don’t change the price: it’s still a $35 piece of hardware.


Still pretty amazing.
link to this extract

Toys R Us to shut all UK stores, resulting in 3,000 job losses • The Guardian

Sarah Butler:


Toys R Us is to shut all 100 of its UK stores, with closures beginning on Thursday after administrators failed to find a buyer for the collapsed retailer, resulting in the loss of 3,000 jobs.

The chain’s administrators said the group would be extending a nationwide discounting programme and encouraged shoppers to “take advantage of special offers while stocks remain high”.

The toy chain appointed Moorfields Advisory to oversee an administration at the end of February after the firm failed to find a last-minute rescuer.

On Wednesday, staff were told that no buyer had been found for Toys R Us and that all stores would close, with 67 staff at the group’s head office in Maidenhead, Berkshire, made redundant.


This isn’t the US arm (that was yesterday). Potential investors were told in February they would need to put in at least £120m to prevent liquidation. But if you were going to try to sell toys now, would you open 100 big retail stores on high streets, malls and out-of-town centres? British retail is having a bad time.
link to this extract

YouTube will link directly to Wikipedia to fight conspiracy theories • WIRED

Louise Matsakis:


On Tuesday, however, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki detailed a potential solution. YouTube will now begin displaying links to fact-based content alongside conspiracy theory videos.

Wojcicki announced the new feature, which she called “information cues,” during a talk with WIRED editor-in-chief Nicholas Thompson at the South by Southwest conference in Austin, Texas. Here’s how it will work: If you search and click on a conspiracy theory video about, say, chemtrails, YouTube will now link to a Wikipedia page that debunks the hoax alongside the video. A video calling into question whether humans have ever landed on the moon might be accompanied by the official Wikipedia page about the Apollo Moon landing in 1969. Wojcicki says the feature will only include conspiracy theories right now that have “significant debate” on the platform.

The decision to include links to other websites represents a dramatic shift for YouTube, which has historically existed as a mostly contained ecosystem. It’s also notable that YouTube chose to link out to text-based sites, rather than rearrange its own search algorithm to further favor content from truthful creators and video journalists. One reason for the decision might be that YouTube wants to avoid the perception that it’s rigging its platform to favor certain creators, a criticism it has faced in the past. It also prevents YouTube from having to censor content outright, serving as the ultimate arbiter of truth.


YouTube (and Google) keep dancing around this subject, but it’s going to bite them hard soon. People get information from YouTube. A lot of that information is just plain wrong. Adults who know better point out that that information is wrong, and they lower their trust, and the trust they offer, in it. Viewers lose trust, advertisers lose trust, it’s a downward spiral.

As a solution, this is also stupid, and – one hopes – short-term. As Mike Isaac pointed out, you don’t solve the problem of an infinitely gameable platform by fact-checking it from a service that literally anyone can edit. Is Wikipedia prepared for the edit wars that will naturally follow from this decision? It’s another example of Google offloading the work of checking content onto someone, anyone, else.

Maybe it’s time for the Encyclopaedia Britannica to make a comeback. Those would be the fact-checks to run alongside those videos. (Though it doesn’t have an entry for “chemtrails” – not surprising, since it’s a made-up word about a fantasy. It does have contrails, though.)
link to this extract

Britain First has just been banned by Facebook for inciting hatred against minorities • Buzzfeed

Mark Di Stefano:


London mayor Sadiq Khan, a frequent target of Britain First, praised Facebook’s action.

“Britain First is a vile and hate-fuelled group whose sole purpose is to sow division,” Khan said in a statement. “Their sick intentions to incite hatred within our society via social media are reprehensible, and Facebook’s decision to remove their content is welcome.

“The global tech revolution has brought incredible benefits and social media is enjoyed by billions of people around the world. But big social media companies must wield the power they’ve amassed responsibly.

Matthew Collins, the head of research at social media advocacy group Hope Not Hate, also praised Facebook’s decision.

“Britain First used Facebook as a means to leverage its position and push out some of the most divisive and vile anti-Muslim hatred you could find online,” Collins said.

“Ironically, if you wanted to watch an ISIS beheading you didn’t need to go to an Islamic State page, instead Britain First would show it for you.”


Here’s the subtle thing. Jim Waterson points out on Twitter that


“large amounts of their enormous Facebook following was based on convincing people to share pictures of dogs, which they then pivoted into racism. They just knew how to game the system better than anyone else! Dogs and racism!”


Meanwhile, we’re still waiting for Trump’s apology for retweeting their stuff. (In his interview with Piers Moron he said “I would certainly apologise if you’d like me to do that.” Moron failed to follow up by asking him to do so.)
link to this extract

Only Russia could be behind UK poison attack: toxin’s co-developer • Reuters

Joseph Ax:


A Russian chemist who helped develop the Soviet-era nerve agent used to poison a former Russian double agent in southern England said only the Russian government could have carried out the attack with such a deadly and advanced toxin.

Vil Mirzayanov, 83, said he had no doubt that Russian President Vladimir Putin was responsible, given that Russia maintains tight control over its Novichok stockpile and that the agent is too complicated for a non-state actor to have weaponized.

“The Kremlin all the time, like all criminals, denying – it doesn’t mean anything,” Mirzayanov said in an interview in his home in Princeton, New Jersey, where he has lived in exile for more than 20 years.

Sergei Skripal, a former Russian military intelligence agent who betrayed dozens of Russian agents to British intelligence, and his daughter are fighting for their lives after they were found on March 4 collapsed on a bench, having been poisoned with Novichok, according to British authorities.

British Prime Minister Theresa May said on Monday that it was “highly likely” that Putin was behind the attack, a charge Russia denies.


Russia’s use of products that simply aren’t available to any standard criminal – polonium and now a nerve agent – is an obvious way of telling any Russian considering working for another state that the consequences are going to be severe. The UK’s response looks milquetoast, but seems to be heading for a version of the Magnitsky Act, which Russia’s rulers really hate. (It’s what they were trying to get Trump’s team to revoke when they had the meeting in Trump tower in summer 2016, during the election campaign.)
link to this extract

Former Equifax executive charged with insider trading • US Securities and Exchange Commission


The Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday charged a former chief information officer of a U.S. business unit of Equifax with insider trading in advance of the company’s September 2017 announcement about a massive data breach that exposed the social security numbers and other personal information of about 148 million U.S. customers.   

According to the SEC’s complaint, Jun Ying, who was next in line to be the company’s global CIO, allegedly used confidential information entrusted to him by the company to conclude that Equifax had suffered a serious breach.  The SEC alleges that before Equifax’s public disclosure of the data breach, Ying exercised all of his vested Equifax stock options and then sold the shares, reaping proceeds of nearly $1 million.  According to the complaint, by selling before public disclosure of the data breach, Ying avoided more than $117,000 in losses.

“As alleged in our complaint, Ying used confidential information to conclude that his company had suffered a massive data breach, and he dumped his stock before the news went public,” said Richard R. Best, Director of the SEC’s Atlanta Regional Office.  “Corporate insiders who learn inside information, including information about material cyber intrusions, cannot betray shareholders for their own financial benefit.”


Well now. This is going to be a good one to watch. If Ying really acted on this information (and the SEC cites some of his web searches which are verrry suspicious), he must have thought that the share price was going to absolutely crater – where in fact it seems more like a 10% fall.

If he’d had the opportunity to read my forthcoming book Cyber Wars, about high-profile hacking incidents, he’d know instead that companies’ share prices usually aren’t affected in the long term by hacks.
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: when I said yesterday that the “Strava bike theft” was a story that went back some years, I’d forgotten that I linked to exactly such back in October 2015.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

Start Up: iPad FacePro at WWDC?, 3D printing Marines, Toys’R’Us in trouble, Fitbit tries again, and more

Maybe stop sharing your bike rides on Strava? Photo by RaINsday on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 8 links for you. Use them wisely. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Cyclists warned to beware sharing data on ride-tracking apps • Sky News

Lorna Shaddick:


Police and cybersecurity firms are warning cyclists to be careful with the data they share on ride-tracking apps because they could be helping bike thieves.

Peter Murtagh, from Dublin, is a keen triathlete – but recently had his top of the range racing and road bikes stolen in a daring, daylight raid on his house.

“I came downstairs and noticed one of my bikes, it was gone. That was in the front of the house,” Mr Murtagh told Sky News.

“Little did I know, the thieves were still in the house, they’d got in with a crowbar, they broke three windows and they stole my second bike too.”

Mr Murtagh cannot prove it, but thinks he might know why the thieves knew exactly where to look.
He had been using an app that logs cycling data, called Strava, to track his cycling speeds and compete against other users – but her did not realise his settings were the default ones – which are “public”.

The setting meant that the start and end of his rides could easily be seen online. He had also recorded the make and model of his top of the range time-trial bikes.


This is a perennial: I found stories of exactly the same content – Strava, high-priced bikes, theft – dating back to 2014. You’ll recall the stories of Strava’s defaults locating secret military bases; now it says it’s going to remove some of that data. Doesn’t get the bikes back though, does it?
link to this extract

Marines’ love affair with 3D printing: small is cheap, and beautiful • Breaking Defense

Sydney Freedberg:


Why are the Marines in love with 3D printing? Like most romances, it starts with the small things, things too small for the conventional supply system to manage, like a two-cent plastic button that preempts a $11,000 repair. Big defense contractors, take notice.

“There’s an intercom in most helicopters,” said Gen. Robert Neller, commandant of the Marine Corps. Ground-pounders like him tend to hit the buttons too hard and break them. But the Pentagon supply system doesn’t deal in replacing individual buttons. “You’ve got to buy the whole faceplate of the intercom,” Neller said. “It costs $11,000.”

The only hitch? The parts weren’t approved for installation on an aircraft. “I said, put the button on,” Neller told the National Defense Industrial Association last week. “Print a bag of them and hang them there.”

Neller’s No. 2, Gen. Glenn Walters, has his own longtime love affair with 3D printing. His favorite anecdote is a Marine Corps tank unit that had six 70-ton M1 Abrams tanks idled because of a broken impeller fan needed to clear the air filter. Ordering a single spare fan through the normal system would cost $1,400 and take 18 months. Instead, Walters said, a young female sergeant in the 1st Maintenance Battalion took the initiative to find a contractor “who could 3D print that thing for about $300 dollars and delivered all of them in seven days.”

“My eyes are watering with what our young people can do right now,” Walters told the McAleese/Credit Suisse conference last week. “I have an engineering background, but I’m telling you, some of these 21- and 22-year-olds are well ahead of me.”


As they should be. 3D printing finding its place: low-cost replacement.
link to this extract

Toys ‘R’ Us misses vendor payments • Bloomberg

Matthew Townsend:


Toys “R” Us Inc. has missed payments to some suppliers in recent days as its U.S. division heads toward a likely liquidation, according to people with knowledge of the situation.

The payments stopped without explanation, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the matter is private. Some of the people said they can’t get anyone to respond to questions at the retailer, which filed for bankruptcy in September and faces a $5bn debt load. Toymakers Mattel Inc. and Hasbro Inc. touched their daily lows on the news.

Toys “R” Us also recently stopped negotiating settlements with vendors on money owned before it filed for bankruptcy, some of the people said. A representative for Wayne, New Jersey-based Toys “R” Us declined to comment.

The bleak situation lends evidence to the notion that Toys “R” Us is moving toward winding down its U.S. operations for good.


Over-leveraged retailers are in some deep brown stuff. If Toys’R’Us goes down, it’s going to be like a neutron bomb hitting toymakers.
link to this extract

iPad Pro with Face ID will ‘likely’ debut at WWDC 2018 in early June • Mac Rumors

Joe Rossignol:


Apple’s rumored iPad Pro with Face ID will likely be released in the second quarter of 2018, according to Rosenblatt Securities analyst Jun Zhang.

iPad Pro with Face ID mockups via Ben Geskin and Carlos Guerra

If accurate, the timeframe suggests Apple will unveil the new iPad Pro models at its annual Worldwide Developers Conference, which will take place June 4-8 at the McEnery Convention Center in San Jose, California. Apple similarly unveiled its current iPad Pro lineup at WWDC last year.

Zhang expects the revamped iPad Pro to have slimmer bezels and no home button, in line with the iPhone X. The revamped design will likely be featured on both the 10.5-inch and 12.9-inch iPad Pro, although his research note didn’t specify.

Apple’s plans to release an iPad Pro with Face ID were first revealed by KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, who said the refresh would occur in 2018. Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman was a bit more specific, noting the iPad Pro with Face ID would debut “a little more than a year” after the current models.

The 10.5-inch iPad Pro and second-generation 12.9-inch iPad Pro launched in June 2017, so it’s not entirely clear if “a little more than a year” meant WWDC 2018 or Apple’s annual September event where it introduces new iPhones.

The new iPad Pro models will likely retain LCDs instead of OLED displays due to supply, cost, and technological constraints. It’s unclear if the tablets will have a notch for the TrueDepth sensor housing, or if the device will have uniformly slim bezels on all four sides with enough room for the components.


Would FaceID on an iPad be more useful than TouchID? I rarely use an iPad in portrait orientation, and hardly ever pick it up that way. And given the number of times I unlock it while it’s in landscape (with the keyboard attached), this doesn’t look like a great idea.

But then people said that about FaceID..
link to this extract

Fitbit’s Versa is the smartwatch the Ionic should have been • TechCrunch

Brian Heater:


The Versa looks exactly like the leaks predicted, with a smaller casing design that has more in common with Pebble’s design language (and, for that matter, the Apple Watch) than the fugly Ionic. It’s a “squircle,” and more to the point it’s thin and light, and will fit a lot more wrists than its last device. That will, hopefully, help broaden the product’s appeal for many among the female user base who may have been put off by the unwieldiness of the Ionic.

In fact, the company’s doubling down with its appeal for a female audience. Version 2.0 of the watch operating system brings targeted tracking for female users that incorporates menstrual cycle data into the overall health tracking picture. The company also, thankfully, began delivering on the promise of more apps a few months back, which means the product will have a stronger foundation than anemic selection Ionic offered over time. The new OS should bring improved, personalized reminders as well, though that’s “coming later in 2018,” according to the company.

The Versa’s screen measures 1.34 inches — which makes it smaller than Apple’s 38mm model. It’s certainly light though, as advertised, and the design language is a major upgrade over the Ionic. It’s actually got most of the Ionic’s features on-board, as well, including both fitness and sleep tracking, heart-rate monitoring and onscreen workouts. The company claims the battery should last around four days on a charge, with normal use — though we’ll be happy to put that claim to the test when we get a review unit.


Looks a zillion times better than the Ionic, and priced at $200 it might have a chance. And Fitbit needs it to be a hit – the fitness band business is dying on its feet.
link to this extract

How conservative activists catfished Twitter • Gizmodo

Kashmir Hill on how Project Veritas – which tried to disprove the Roy Moore accusations (and ended up showing how well-reported they were) and has had to pay $100,000 to someone it recorded without consent – targeted people from Twitter:


While Project Veritas’s findings weren’t particularly shocking, how they were obtained was. Project Veritas didn’t just fake-recruit its targets, it fake-seduced them. Many of the male employees were secretly recorded while on dates at dimly-lit restaurants, sipping wine. Based on the number of times he appears in the videos in different locations and dress, one security engineer, Clay Haynes, appears to have been enamored enough with the operative pumping him for information to go out with her at least three times. All of the Veritas operatives’ faces are blurred, but you can see his date’s jangly bracelets and long blond hair. It’s unclear just how far the seduction of Haynes went, but they became serious enough to go on a double date to Morton’s Steakhouse with her friend, a disguised James O’Keefe.

“NO ONE should have to experience this,” said Haynes via Facebook message. Haynes, who is still employed by Twitter, ultimately opted not to talk to me at the company’s request.

Beyond the questionable journalistic ethics of exploiting people’s desires for work and love, Project Veritas’s tactics broke the law, says John Nockleby, a professor who specializes in privacy at Loyola Law School-Los Angeles. While consent laws for recording conversations vary from state to state, California is a two-party consent state, meaning you have to tell someone if you’re recording them, or face up to a year of jail time and a $2,500 fine. “You’re allowed to do video in a public place without getting consent, but not take audio, unless it’s someone like a politician giving a speech to a crowd,” Nockleby told me by phone. “In California, even in a public place, if you’re audio recording without consent, that’s not legal.”


link to this extract

YouTube doesn’t know why Alex Jones videos are appearing at the top of its search results • Vice

David Gilbert:


An InfoWars video claiming that Antifa members are the “prime suspects” in the mysterious package bombings in Austin, Texas appeared at the top of search results Monday on YouTube — and the company has no idea why.

The video appeared as the third result when VICE News searched for the term “Austin explosions” on Monday evening. Another Infowars video was listed fourth in the search results.

The videos were posted by Ron Gibson, who is part of Jones’ Free Speech Systems YouTube network. His channel alone has over 158,000 subscribers and the video which was appearing on YouTube’s search results has been viewed more than 9,000 times.

In the first video Jones asks: “Is Antifa behind the third bombing in Austin?” before answering his own question by calling them “prime suspects.” His evidence? “They are violent, they call for violence, they call for attacking gentrification, any old white people moving into East Austin.” He goes on to say that the accusation is “not a conspiracy theory” despite providing no supporting evidence

Jones also says Antifa is “listed as a terror group.”


(Narrator’s voice: “it’s not listed as a terror group.”)

YouTube really needs to start getting its crap together. The radicalisation problem looks exactly like this. Divisive, inflammatory, untrue content. But hey, it’s all stuff you can sell ads against, right?

Also: you really must click through to the story for its wonderful illustration around the headline.
link to this extract

Russian pleads guilty to aiding massive hacks in US • Daily Beast

Kevin Poulsen:


Jurijs Martisevs, a 36-year-old Moscovite arrested on a trip to Latvia, helped run a service called Scan4you that filled a crucial niche in the underground economy. Before deploying a piece of malware, hackers need to know it won’t be immediately detected and quarantined by the dozens of consumer and commercial security products on the market. That’s where Scan4you comes in. For fifteen cents a pop, a hacker could upload their pre-launch code to Scan4you, which would then automatically check it against 30 different security scanners and report back the results.

Armed with that information, a hacker can make iterative changes to their code until the detection rate is sufficiently low, or even zero. Scan4you was the most successful of a slew of similar offerings advertised on underground forums, and operated from at least 2009 until the arrest of Martisevs and a co-defendant last year.

“Throughout its lifetime, the service has had thousands of users,” reads a statement of facts agreed to by Martisevs, “and has received and scanned millions of malicious files.”

According to Martisevs’ plea documents, Scan4you’s customers included some serious players, including the perpetrators of a national retail breach in November 2013. The retailer is unnamed, but the timing and description coincides with that month’s massive Target hack. The hackers submitted variations of their credit card stealing code to Scan4you four times over the course of two weeks before finally deploying the malware on Black Friday weekend. The Target breach ultimately netted thieves some 40 million credit and debit cards, and resulted in a $10 million consumer class action against Target.

Ruslans Bondars, Martisevs’ co-defendant, was allegedly the creator and technical brains behind Scan4you. Bondars is a Latvian national extradited along with Martisevs. He’s in custody pending a May trial date.


The Feds may have the full database of malware, and even customer details. That would be a hell of a thing.
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Start Up: Trump blocks Broadcom, how AirBnB hit New York, S9 sells.. the same?, rogue satellites!, and more

Remember Google’s Pixel C tablet? Android P doesn’t. Photo by Joe Wilcox on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 11 links for you. Where it’s at. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Trump blocks Broadcom’s $142bn Qualcomm takeover • FT

Eric Platt:


US president Donald Trump blocked Broadcom’s $142bn takeover bid for chipmaker Qualcomm on Monday, halting the Singapore-based group’s bitter four-month battle for its US rival.

In a statement from the White House on Monday evening, Mr Trump said the deal — the largest tech acquisition ever proposed — threatened to “impair the national security” of the US, following a recommendation by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.

“The proposed takeover of Qualcomm by the Purchaser is prohibited, and any substantially equivalent merger, acquisition, or takeover, whether effected directly or indirectly, is also prohibited,” Mr Trump wrote in an order.


The end of that, one hopes.
link to this extract

Age checks for UK pr0n site visitors on ice as regulator cobbles together some guidance • The Register

Rebecca Hill:


The checks, which will require people to prove they are over 18 in order to view web-based filth, were meant to come into force in April but now may not be introduced until much later in 2018, possibly towards year-end.

The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) said the delay would allow the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) time to draw up and consult on guidance for porn-makers.

The BBFC was only approved as regulator at the start of February, and critics already voiced concern that the April timetable was too tight to allow pornographers to comply, especially when the regulator was yet to publish any guidance.

Government minister Lord Ashton was pressed on the time it had taken to appoint the regulator – let alone issue guidance – during a debate in Parliament last month, with peers saying that progress had not been “particularly satisfactory”.

The BBFC’s public consultation will begin later this month. It is hoped that the guidance will set out how the BBFC plans to police the space, detail what blocking those that don’t comply will entail, and what the appeals process will be.

Parliament will then have to clear the guidance, after which DCMS said there would be “up to three months” before the law comes into force.

“It is anticipated age verification will be enforceable by the end of the year,” DCMS said.


Have a look at the link where the DCMS notifies this, though. It’s a huge self-congratulatory thing about 5G, and then a few lines announcing the delay. This is how governments try to keep embarrassments quiet. Probably won’t save them from more embarrassment later in the year; the porn-age idea is near unenforceable.
link to this extract

What Airbnb did to New York City’s housing market • CityLab

Alastair Boone:


To map this process, Wachsmuth and his team used estimates of Airbnb activity from AirDNA, a California-based firm that scrapes and analyzes Airbnb data. They studied Airbnb activity from September 2014 to August 2017, including more than 80 million data points, for the whole 20 million population of the New York City metro region. They also used a number of new spatial big-data methodologies developed specifically to analyze short-term rentals.

Their conclusion: Most of those rumors are true. Wachsmuth found reason to believe that Airbnb has indeed raised rents, removed housing from the rental market, and fueled gentrification—at least in New York City. To figure out how, the researchers mapped out four key categories of Airbnb’s impact in New York: where Airbnb is concentrated and how that’s changing; which hosts make the most money; whether it’s driving gentrification in the city; and how much housing it has removed from the rental market.

The phrase “home sharing” evokes an image of an individual who opens their home and rents out their extra space to wanderlust-y strangers. This is, after all, how Airbnb got its start: Struggling to make rent in San Francisco, founders Joe Gebbia and Brian Chesky started renting out floorspace in their living room and cooking breakfast for their guests in 2007. Today, it is worth some $30bn.

While many people still use the platform this way, Wachsmuth found that 12% of Airbnb hosts in New York City, or 6,200 of the city’s 50,500 total hosts, are commercial operators—that is, they have multiple entire-home listings, or control many private rooms. And these commercial operators earned 28% of New York’s Airbnb revenue (that’s $184m out of $657m).


link to this extract

The day I went viral • Jonathan Pinnock, writer of stuff

Pinnock tweeted this, which is the last two lines of David Gerard’s excellent “Attack of the 50 Foot Blockchain”, and it went mad:


At the time of writing, it’s showing 2594 RTs and 7315 likes. By the time you read this, both numbers will probably be considerably higher.

Quite apart from the irony of my most popular ever tweet (by a country mile) being one promoting someone else’s book, it’s all a bit weird. All I intended to do was highlight something that amused me, and because I was tweeting from my phone, I didn’t even manage to get in a link to the book itself. And then Rory Cellan-Jones, the BBC’s technology correspondent, RT’d me (no idea how he saw it). Then either Charlie Stross or William Gibson RT’d me, followed by either William Gibson or Charlie Stross. Oh, and then Duncan Jones.

From then on, it acquired a wild and happy life of its own as more and more people spread it to the far corners of Twitter. I’d often wondered how I’d feel if my mentions ever started to heat up, and I finally got the chance to find out. Here are what it’s like:


No particular reason why this should go viral now; it’s as true as it has been for months. But the experience he relates is so true.
link to this extract

Google gives up on tablets: Android P marks an end to its ambitious efforts to take on Apple’s iPad • Apple Insider

Daniel Eran Dilger:


Google’s upcoming Android P release drops support for Pixel C, the company’s last effort at building an Android tablet. While it once appeared that Google wanted to ditch Android and move to its web browser based ChromeOS, the termination of its last Android tablet follows Google’s discontinuation last summer of Chromebook Pixel, the premium-priced laptop running ChromeOS.Google failed to make a dent in Apple’s iPad business despite trying longer and harder than Microsoft’s Zune attempt to rival iPods

Android P also drops support for all remaining Nexus branded devices. In fact, the next Android release only supports Google’s last two batches of Pixel phones – which themselves did not sell well – indicating a rather dramatic scaling back of what was once supposed to be a vast array of hardware expanding into new directions to tackle Apple at every turn.

While things like Chromebooks and Nexus Player TV boxes were launched as experiments, Google’s efforts to build a self-branded tablet (both to rival Apple’s iPad and to show its own Android licensees how to build a good tablet) was always presented as a serious, strategic effort to conquer Apple’s second largest iOS franchise.

Here’s a look at why Google failed to make a dent in Apple’s iPad business despite trying longer and harder than Microsoft’s Zune attempt to rival iPods.


Android tablets as a class have fared really poorly. Amazon is now the biggest-selling in that group, and it doesn’t even run Google Play. Chinese vendors are exiting the market. And the Pixel C.. who’s got one?
link to this extract

Bitcoin is ridiculous. Blockchain is dangerous • Bloomberg

Paul Ford:


the blockchain can be a form of media. The writer Maria Bustillos is starting a magazine that will publish on the blockchain — which means it will be impossible to take down. (Disclosure: In theory, I’ll write for Maria, who’s a friend, and she’ll pay me in cryptocurrency, or what she calls “space jewels.”) One of her aims is to make it impossible for people—Peter Thiel, for example, who backed Hulk Hogan’s lawsuit against Gawker—to threaten publications they dislike.

You could even make a distributed magazine called Information of Vital Public Interest About Peter Thiel that would be awfully hard to sue into oblivion. It’s the marketplace of ideas. Literally. Try another thought experiment. Remember that anonymously created list of men who worked in media and who were alleged sexual harassers? You could, by whispering the allegations from one wallet to the next, put that information on a blockchain. You could make a web browser plug-in so that whenever someone visited a sexual harasser’s LinkedIn page, that page could glow bright red. You could have a distributed, immutable record of sexual harassment allegations on the internet. (Is there an economy around such allegations? Well, people do pay for gossip. GossipCoin?)

I’m not saying this would be a good idea. In fact, I’m pretty sure it’d be a bad one. Point is, this sort of thing used to be prohibitively difficult to pull off at any scale, because anonymity can be hard to protect, and platforms are hard to run and easy to attack. Now the frameworks are coming to build such tools and make them anonymous and decentralized, so that they might endure, and, as with all internet things, they’ll arrive well ahead of the ethics we need to make sense of them…

…People feel compelled to make predictions about blockchains. Here’s mine: The current wave of coins will eventually ebb, because it’s a big, inefficient, unholy mess. It’s more ideology than financial instrument, and ideology is rarely a sustainable store of value. Plus, transactions are slow (everyone says they’re fixing that), and you shouldn’t have to use an aluminum smelter’s worth of power to make new currency.

Most things that the blockchain promises to do can be done more easily with other technologies, including good ol’ fiat currency. But I know a mind virus when I see it.


link to this extract

Cryptocurrency scammers of Giza make off with $2 million after ICO • CNBC

Arjun Kharpal:


Investors who spoke to CNBC all described a common experience with the ICO in question: They thought the project was legitimate until warning signs began to appear, including a falling out with the company’s sole supplier, a lack of correspondence from its supposed founders, and failed attempts to recoup the lost funds.

The apparently well-orchestrated scam centers around a mysterious individual called Marco Fike, the COO of Giza. Among the eight investors, partners and former employees of Giza interviewed by CNBC, all claim they have never seen Marco Fike’s face.

The ICO was for a supposed start-up called Giza, which claimed to be developing a super-secure device that would allow people to store cryptocurrencies.

It carried out its ICO in January and drew investors for several weeks after. One person who put money into the project told CNBC that they invested ether that was equivalent to $10,000 at the time, and another said they had put in around $5,000 worth of ether.

At the beginning of February, Giza had raised and was holding more than 2,100 ethereum coins, which at the time were worth around $2.4 million. All but $16 worth of those ethereum coins are now missing.

But after putting in money throughout January and into February, many who had invested began to become suspicious of the project.

“Everything was fine, until that company that was meant to develop their device came out on the internet and said that Giza has cut ties, and it seems to be a scam and they might not be developing anything. Then things started looking fishy,” an investor named Chris, who wished to keep his surname anonymous, told CNBC by phone.


Fools and their money: new method found to induce parting.
link to this extract

Apple new entry-level MacBook to reach 4 million in unit shipments in 2018, says Digitimes Research

Joseph Tsai:


Apple is preparing to release a new entry-level MacBook at the end of the second quarter with a price tag expected to be about the same level as that of the existing MacBook Air or slightly higher, according to Digitimes Research.

Digitimes Research senior analyst Jim Hsiao expects shipments for the new MacBook to reach around four million units in 2018.

Hsiao pointed out that Apple originally looked to reduce cost by seeking panel supply for the new MacBook from a China-based maker, but the US-based vendor has decided to source the panels from Korea-based LG Display due to issues at the China supplier.

The 13.3-inch a-Si panels for the new notebook feature the same resolution as Apple’s 13.3-inch MacBook Pro at 2,560 by 1,600.

LG Display will begin supplying the panel in April with the new MacBook scheduled to enter mass production at the end of May or the beginning of June.


Note this isn’t saying that Apple’s going to discontinue the MacBook Air. There’s a lot of discussion on sites that have picked this up where they think it’s going to be a Retina MacBook Air. Still not seeing that.
link to this extract

Apple to acquire digital-magazine-subscription service Texture • WSJ

Tripp Mickle:


Apple said it will acquire Next Issue Media LLC and its digital-magazine-subscription service Texture, a product developed by top magazine companies that bundles together some 200 subscriptions into one monthly service.

The acquisition comes as Apple looks to beef up its services business, which includes music streaming and mobile payments.

Apple has set a goal of increasing total revenue from services to more than $40 billion by 2020. The company generated nearly $30 billion in services revenue in its fiscal year ended in September.

Apple typically takes a 15% cut of subscription services from publishers and content providers, including Netflix Inc. and HBO, if those subscriptions are purchased through the App Store.

Terms of the deal weren’t disclosed. Next Issue Media and Texture are owned by Condé Nast, Meredith Corp. , Hearst Corp., Rogers Communications Inc. and KKR & Co.

The magazine industry for years has sought ways to transition from print to online, but has faced profound challenges competing with tech giants for digital ad dollars, while print ad revenue continues to decline…

…“We are committed to quality journalism from trusted sources and allowing magazines to keep producing beautifully designed and engaging stories for users,” said Eddy Cue, Apple’s senior vice president who oversees the services business.


I guess that answers all the people asking “where’s the Spotify for news?”

Sort-of related (at least, revealed by Cue at the same SXSW event): Apple Music now has 38 million subscribers.
link to this extract

FCC accuses stealthy startup of launching rogue satellites • IEEE Spectrum

Mark Harris:


On 12 January, a Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV) rocket blasted off from India’s eastern coast. While its primary cargo was a large Indian mapping satellite, dozens of secondary CubeSats from other countries travelled along with it. Seattle-based Planetary Resources supplied a spacecraft that will test prospecting tools for future asteroid miners, Canadian company Telesat launched a broadband communications satellite, and a British Earth-observation mission called Carbonite will capture high-definition video of the planet’s surface.

Also on board were four small satellites that probably should not have been there. SpaceBee-1, 2, 3, and 4 were briefly described by the Indian space agency ISRO as “two-way satellite communications and data relay” devices from the United States. No operator was specified, and only ISRO publicly noted that they successfully reached orbit the same day.

IEEE Spectrum can reveal that the SpaceBees are almost certainly the first spacecraft from a Silicon Valley startup called Swarm Technologies, currently still in stealth mode. Swarm was founded in 2016 by one engineer who developed a spacecraft concept for Google and another who sold his previous company to Apple. The SpaceBees were built as technology demonstrators for a new space-based Internet of Things communications network.


You may think: what has the FCC got to do with satellites launched in India? Turns out there’s an international treaty about what you can launch into space, and both the US and India are signatories. The suggestion from that Stack Exchange discussion is that India is responsible for any damage the satellites cause.

More to the point, do we need an IoT in space?
link to this extract

Report: Samsung sets high Galaxy S9 sales goal, despite low pre-order figures • Android Authority

Duncan Elder:


Recent reports suggest that Samsung plans to ship 43 million units of its flagship Galaxy S9 and S9 Plus smartphones. This is around two million more than the 41 million S8 handsets it reportedly sold last year.

This report comes from Korean financial news website The Bell, which quotes parts industry shipment plans that suggest Samsung believes it can improve on last year’s sales.

The article’s sources say that Samsung has made quarterly plans for 12 million shipments in the first quarter, 13 million in the second, 10 million in the third, and eight million in the fourth. While not set in stone, these parts forecasts can be used to estimate how many finished products Samsung plans to ship.

Just two weeks ago, Gartner released a report that suggested there was a 5.6% drop in smartphone sales in Q4 2017, when compared to the previous year. However, despite this drop, Samsung was one of the few companies that actually managed to increase its year-on-year sales in that quarter. This kept Samsung as the phone maker with the largest overall share of the smartphone market.


The reporting on this is all over the place. A different data point: “Galaxy S9 first-day sales reportedly much lower than Galaxy S8, but overall goal still higher” which says that “Preorders haven’t been able to match the Galaxy S8’s performance, and first-day sales numbers were around 70% of the Galaxy S8, a new report says. That would be a significant drop, suggesting that Samsung’s plan to release an “S” update this year isn’t going over well with consumers.” (Those figures from Yonhap News.)
link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Start Up: goodbye Moto?, YouTube’s radicalising problem, Twitter stops the thieves, here come the miners!, and more

Apple may have an option when it comes to fixing the problems some people have with its new key design. Photo by Maurizio Pesce on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 12 links for you. No, you pivot to video. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

YouTube, the Great Radicalizer • The New York Times

Zeynep Tufekci watched some Trump videos on YouTube in 2016, and found it recommended more and more right-wing content:


Since I was not in the habit of watching extreme right-wing fare on YouTube, I was curious whether this was an exclusively right-wing phenomenon. So I created another YouTube account and started watching videos of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, letting YouTube’s recommender algorithm take me wherever it would.

Before long, I was being directed to videos of a leftish conspiratorial cast, including arguments about the existence of secret government agencies and allegations that the United States government was behind the attacks of Sept. 11. As with the Trump videos, YouTube was recommending content that was more and more extreme than the mainstream political fare I had started with.

Intrigued, I experimented with nonpolitical topics. The same basic pattern emerged. Videos about vegetarianism led to videos about veganism. Videos about jogging led to videos about running ultramarathons.

It seems as if you are never “hard core” enough for YouTube’s recommendation algorithm. It promotes, recommends and disseminates videos in a manner that appears to constantly up the stakes. Given its billion or so users, YouTube may be one of the most powerful radicalizing instruments of the 21st century.

This is not because a cabal of YouTube engineers is plotting to drive the world off a cliff. A more likely explanation has to do with the nexus of artificial intelligence and Google’s business model. (YouTube is owned by Google.) For all its lofty rhetoric, Google is an advertising broker, selling our attention to companies that will pay for it. The longer people stay on YouTube, the more money Google makes.

What keeps people glued to YouTube? Its algorithm seems to have concluded that people are drawn to content that is more extreme than what they started with — or to incendiary content in general.


She compares it to how we feast on fatty foods – driven by our evolutionary instincts, which lead us astray when such foods aren’t rare but instead are plentiful.

The question now is, will YouTube accept this, and fix it?

link to this extract

Omega-3s aren’t so great for your heart after all • Lifehacker

Alice Callahan:


a closer look at the origin of the fish oil story shows that more skepticism was warranted from the very beginning. According to a 2014 paper published in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology, Bang and Dyerberg’s hypothesis was built on thin ice. For one thing, they never actually measured the incidence of heart disease in Greenland, instead relying on sketchy local estimates, which were unreliable since many people lived too far from medical facilities to have their diseases or causes of death accurately diagnosed. Subsequent studies found that rates of cardiovascular disease in Inuit populations are just as high, if not higher than in western populations, despite their high intake of omega-3 fatty acids.

Plus, the Greenlanders seem to have evolved genetic differences that allow them to process their unique diet. A 2015 paper published in the journal Science identified gene variants common in Inuits (and rare in Europeans) that help them metabolize their fatty diet and keep blood omega-3 levels in balance with other fats in the body. Without that genetic background, someone of European ancestry eating an Inuit diet might end up with much higher blood cholesterol and omega-3 levels.

Fish is still good for us, though. Observational studies, which estimate how much fish people eat and their incidence of heart disease, consistently find that eating fish at least once per week is associated with a lower risk of dying of coronary heart disease.


link to this extract

Source: Motorola is cancelling the Moto X5, moving away from niche Mods • Android Police

David Ruddock:


According to a source familiar with the company’s plans, as part of today’s downsizing of Motorola’s engineering team in Chicago, the Lenovo-owned smartphone maker has completely abandoned plans to launch the successor to last year’s Moto X4, the as-yet unannounced Moto X5. The X5 was leaked in significant detail in January.

Motorola continues to be a drag on Lenovo, which had initially promised to turn its ailing smartphone division profitable within two quarters of its acquisition. That never happened. Lenovo slashed and burned much of Motorola’s global workforce and presence, but the business hasn’t managed to make the turnaround it so clearly needs.

Our source states that Motorola will be narrowing its focus back to E, G, and Z phones for the time being. It’s possible the Moto X name could return at some point, but that’s looking unlikely in light of this news.

Additionally, Motorola will be largely discontinuing its efforts in the realm of more… eccentric Mods for its Z phones, and instead stick to products it believes can actually turn a profit.


So Motorola, like LG, has discovered that nobody (to a near approximation) buys Mods. That downsizing in Chicago is 190 people, or half its engineering staff there, according to the linked article. The curtain is coming down on Motorola, the mobile phone company that just couldn’t make a profit in the smartphone age, no matter who owned it.
link to this extract

Twitter just suspended a ton of accounts known for stealing tweets • Buzzfeed

Julia Reinstein:


Many of these accounts were hugely popular, with hundreds of thousands or even millions of followers.

In addition to stealing people’s tweets without credit, some of these accounts are known as “tweetdeckers” due to their practice of teaming up in exclusive Tweetdeck groups and mass-retweeting one another’s — and paying customers’ — tweets into forced virality.

A Twitter spokesperson declined to comment on individual accounts, but BuzzFeed News understands the accounts were suspended for violating Twitter’s spam policy.

Tweetdecking, as it’s called, is an explicit violation of Twitter’s spam policy, which does not allow users to “sell, purchase, or attempt to artificially inflate account interactions.”

Still, Twitter has previously struggled to crack down on these accounts.

After a BuzzFeed News story uncovered the practice of tweetdecking in January, Twitter announced new spam-fighting changes to Tweetdeck, including removing the ability to simultaneously retweet a tweet across multiple accounts.

“Tweetdecking is over. Our follower gains are gonna diminish,” Andrew Guerrero, a 23-year-old tweetdecker in New Mexico, told BuzzFeed News after Twitter announced the changes in February. (Guerrero asked that his account name not be disclosed since it could get him suspended.)


Interesting how Twitter is working inward, from the comparatively easy targets, implicitly towards the tougher ones.
link to this extract

This is what happens when bitcoin miners take over your town • POLITICO Magazine

Paul Roberts:


The utilities’ larger challenge comes from the legitimate commercial operators, whose appetite for megawatts has upended a decades-old model of publicly owned power. The combined output of the basin’s five dams averages around 3,000 megawatts, or enough for the population of Los Angeles. Until fairly recently, perhaps 80% of this massive output was exported via contracts that were hugely advantageous for locals. Cryptocurrency mining has been changing all that, to a degree that is only now becoming clear. By the end of 2018, Carlson reckons the basin will have a total of 300 megawatts of mining capacity. But that is nothing compared to what some hope to see in the basin. Over the past 12 months or so, the three public utilities reportedly have received applications and inquiries for future power contracts that, were they all to be approved, could approach 2,000 megawatts—enough to consume two-thirds of the basin’s power output.

Just because miners want power doesn’t mean they get it. Some inquiries are withdrawn. And all three county public utilities have considerable discretion when it comes to granting power requests. But by law, they must consider any legitimate request for power, which has meant doing costly studies and holding hearings—sparking a prolonged, public debate over this new industry’s impact on the basin’s power economy. There are concerns about the huge costs of new substations, transmission wires and other infrastructure necessary to accommodate these massive loads. In Douglas County, where the bulk of the new mining projects are going in, a brand new 84-megawatt substation that should have been adequate for the next 30 to 50 years of normal population growth was fully subscribed in less than a year.

Many also fear that the new mines will suck up so much of the power surplus that is currently exported that local rates will have to rise. In fact, miners’ appetite for power is growing so rapidly that the three counties have instituted surcharges for extra infrastructure, and there is talk of moratoriums on new mines. There is also talk of something that would have been inconceivable just a few years ago: buying power from outside suppliers. That could mean the end of decades of ultracheap power—all for a new, highly volatile sector that some worry may not be around long anyway. Indeed, one big fear, says Dennis Bolz, a Chelan County Public Utility commissioner, is that a prolonged price collapse will cause miners to abandon the basin—and leave ratepayers with “an infrastructure that may or may not have a use.”


A great piece – though the insanity behind bitcoin is just depressing.
link to this extract

Search engine for source code •


Source Code Search Engine
Find any alphanumeric snippet, signature or keyword in the web pages HTML, JS and CSS code.

Ultimate solution for digital marketing and affiliate marketing research, PublicWWW allow you to perform searches this way, something that is not possible with other regular search engines:

• Any HTML, JavaScript, CSS and plain text in web page source code
• References to StackOverflow questions in HTML, .CSS and .JS files
• Web designers and developers who hate IE
• Sites with the same analytics id: “UA-19778070-“
• Sites using the following version of nginx: “Server: nginx/1.4.7”
• Advertising networks users: “”…


And many more. Sure others will find uses for this, such as tracking down copies, and sites created by the same person/people (for scams?).
link to this extract

Artificial intelligence could identify gang crimes—and ignite an ethical firestorm • Science

Matthew Hutson:


…the partially generative algorithm reduced errors by close to 30%, the team reported at the Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Society (AIES) conference this month in New Orleans, Louisiana. The researchers have not yet tested their algorithm’s accuracy against trained officers.

It’s an “interesting paper,” says Pete Burnap, a computer scientist at Cardiff University who has studied crime data. But although the predictions could be useful, it’s possible they would be no better than officers’ intuitions, he says. Haubert agrees, but he says that having the assistance of data modeling could sometimes produce “better and faster results.” Such analytics, he says, “would be especially useful in large urban areas where a lot of data is available.”

But researchers attending the AIES talk raised concerns during the Q&A afterward. How could the team be sure the training data were not biased to begin with? What happens when someone is mislabeled as a gang member? Lemoine asked rhetorically whether the researchers were also developing algorithms that would help heavily patrolled communities predict police raids.

Hau Chan, a computer scientist now at Harvard University who was presenting the work, responded that he couldn’t be sure how the new tool would be used. “I’m just an engineer,” he said. Lemoine quoted a lyric from a song about the wartime rocket scientist Wernher von Braun, in a heavy German accent: “Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?” Then he angrily walked out.

Approached later for comment, Lemoine said he had talked to Chan to smooth things over. “I don’t necessarily think that we shouldn’t build tools for the police, or that we should,” Lemoine said (commenting, he specified, as an individual, not as a Google representative). “I think that when you are building powerful things, you have some responsibility to at least consider how could this be used.”

Two of the paper’s senior authors spent nearly 20 minutes deflecting such questions during a later interview. “It’s kind of hard to say at the moment,” said Jeffrey Brantingham, an anthropologist at the University of California, Los Angeles. “It’s basic research.” Milind Tambe, a computer scientist at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, agreed. Might a tool designed to classify gang crime be used to, say, classify gang crime? They wouldn’t say.


link to this extract

Bad traffic: Sandvine’s PacketLogic devices used to deploy government spyware in Turkey and redirect Egyptian users to affiliate ads? • Citizenlab

Bill Marczak, Jakub Dalek, Sarah McKune, Adam Senft, John Scott-Railton, and Ron Deibert


• Through Internet scanning, we found deep packet inspection (DPI) middleboxes on Türk Telekom’s network. The middleboxes were being used to redirect hundreds of users in Turkey and Syria to nation-state spyware when those users attempted to download certain legitimate Windows applications.

• We found similar middleboxes at a Telecom Egypt demarcation point. On a number of occasions, the middleboxes were apparently being used to hijack Egyptian Internet users’ unencrypted web connections en masse, and redirect the users to revenue-generating content such as affiliate ads and browser cryptocurrency mining scripts.

• After an extensive investigation, we matched characteristics of the network injection in Turkey and Egypt to Sandvine PacketLogic devices. We developed a fingerprint for the injection we found in Turkey, Syria, and Egypt and matched our fingerprint to a second-hand PacketLogic device that we procured and measured in a lab setting.

• The apparent use of Sandvine devices to surreptitiously inject malicious and dubious redirects for users in Turkey, Syria, and Egypt raises significant human rights concerns.


link to this extract

Apple might be fixing the MacBook’s most annoying problem • Gizmodo

Alex Cranz:


Apple’s patent suggests three primary ideas. One is to apply a membrane between the mechanism that moves the key (also known as a switch) and the keycap. That’s a funny one to attempt to patent as a number of keyboard makers already do something similar, including Apple. Topre and Razer both make “hybrid” switches that incorporate a membrane and a mechanical component, too. This latest Apple hybrid would simply add another membrane to specifically protect the mechanical elements.

These key switches would use air to clear debris. Image: Apple

The second idea Apple has is using a perforated membrane that would, it appears, emit gas or air with each keypress, effectively clearing the key of debris.

The third idea is to create, essentially, an awning around the keycap that funnels debris away from the key switch.

All three ideas, implemented in a wide variety of ways, can be found in the patent here.


This is well overdue; Apple has a big PR problem with its new keyboards’ penchant for sticking. Personally, I’m waiting until that’s solved before buying a new one. Though this one I’m using (from 2012) still runs fine – in the past six months it’s had a new battery and logic board. Nothing wrong with it.
link to this extract

MacBook Air: Why won’t it die? • Macworld

Jason Snell:


While I love Retina displays, I know a lot of people who either don’t see a difference or don’t care about the difference. The processors might be a few years old, but for a lot of use cases, the MacBook Air [which lacks a Retina display] is fast enough. (I’ve edited dozens of complex Logic Pro X projects on an old 11-inch Air.)

USB-C/Thunderbolt 3 ports might be exciting and new and offer a lot of potential for improved throughput, but for most regular users they’re a liability, a confusing and incompatible port that requires an additional investment in adapters and dongles to further raise the price of moving to a new laptop. (The Air also has that old-style keyboard. A lot of people like the new keyboard on modern Mac laptops, but for others it does take some getting used to. The keyboard on the Air requires no adaptation.)

And can we deny that the MagSafe adapter on the MacBook Air is a better way to charge your laptop than using either half (in the case of the MacBook Pro without Touch Bar) or 100% (in the case of the MacBook) of your available USB-C ports?

Maybe this is what happens when Apple introduces innovative new features—and some portion of the buying public simply shrugs and fails to see the value in it, given the price. (This may also explain why several people I know have sold their modern 15-inch MacBook Pros with Touch Bar and gone back to the previous-generation model.)


I just don’t see the MacBook Air going away, nor getting a price cut, while it keeps selling. If you have a rock-solid winner which pulls in the profit quarter after quarter, and has done so for years – while your other models are having to work to justify their existence (*cough*keyboard*cough*USB-C*) then it’s utterly a no-brainer to keep churning it out.
link to this extract

What Siri creator Norman Winarsky thinks of Apple’s Siri now • Quartz

Corinne Purtill:


This isn’t where Winarsky thought Siri would be at this point. In a recent interview with Quartz, Winarsky said that the AI’s current capabilities fell short of his earlier predictions for the assistant in several key ways.

Siri is great for setting reminders, checking the weather, sending texts for you and other relatively mundane tasks. But it has an imperfect grasp of users’ preferences and past history. Its predictive intelligence is limited—it’s not great at knowing what you want before you know you want it. And while vastly improved from its earliest days, Siri still isn’t a sparkling conversationalist. “Surprise and delight is kind of missing right now,” said Winarsky, now a consultant and venture capitalist.
Winarsky acknowledges that some of this disappointment stems from the sheer difficulty of predicting the pace of major technological advancement, which Bill Gates once summed up as the human tendency to “overestimate the change that will occur in the next two years and underestimate the change that will occur in the next 10.”

But part of it is also likely because Apple chose to take Siri in a very different direction than the one its founders envisioned. Pre-Apple, Winarsky said, Siri was intended to launch specifically as a travel and entertainment concierge. Were you to arrive at an airport to discover a cancelled flight, for example, Siri would already be searching for an alternate route home by the time you pulled your phone from your pocket—and if none was available, would have a hotel room ready to book. It would have a smaller remit, but it would learn it flawlessly, and then gradually extend to related areas. Apple launched Siri as an assistant that can help you in all areas of your life, a bigger challenge that will inevitably take longer to perfect, Winarsky said. (It’s certainly not an impossible one—competitors like Google Assistant have already surpassed Siri’s ability to navigate travel and other logistics.)


link to this extract

Kodak pt 5: KodakCoin ICO Light Paper finally released! • Attack of the 50 Foot Blockchain

David Gerard:


The ICO [initial coin offering] template is:

• State a problem;
• assert that ERC-20 tokens on the ethereum blockchain will solve it;
• there aren’t any other steps.

This section of the paper outlines steps one and two — why photographers will want to sign up to sell their photos on KodakOne:

Money: KodakOne’s AI-powered Big Data infringement detection — an automated copyright trolling engine — will pay you instantly! In KodakCoin.
Trust: Every transaction and license agreement “immutably stored in our decentralized registry”!
Time: Distribution is work. Our decentralised platform will be your central one-stop shop!

Not answered: why a centralised registry benefits from decentralisation, how the magic AI pixie dust works, or — a question not answered at any point — why professional photographers would want to be paid in a minor crypto that can’t even be legally traded, rather than actual money.

They don’t even offer to redeem these untradeable objects for cash, though you’ll be able to buy things from WENN Digital with them in the future:


KODAKCoin tokenholders will have no right to return KODAKCoin to WENN Digital or to receive a refund or otherwise require WENN Digital to exchange any amount of KODAKCoin for fiat currency. However, holders of KODAKCoin will have the ability to use them to purchase goods and services on the KODAKOne Platform’s marketplace.


Photo licensing sites abound. Why should anyone use this one?


Another notable quote from this takedown: “They’ve licensed the name ‘Kodak’ from Eastman Kodak, the flayed and tattered hide of what was once a famous film company.”

link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified