
A £200m relief road around Lincoln has been held up by the presence of.. possibly one bat. CC-licensed photo by Florida Fish and Wildlife on Flickr.
You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.
There’s another post coming this week at the Social Warming Substack on Friday at 0845 UK time. Free signup.
A selection of 9 links for you. Can you hear it? I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.
Online safety laws to strengthen to protect people of all ages from devastating self-harm content • GOV.UK
»
The government has today (8 September) announced urgent action to toughen the Online Safety Act by putting stricter legal requirements on tech companies to hunt down and remove material that encourages or assists serious self-harm, before it can destroy lives and tear families apart.
While platforms already have to take specific steps to protect children from this dangerous self-harm content, the government recognises that adults battling mental health challenges are equally at risk from exposure to material that could trigger a mental health crisis or worse.
The new regulations mean that content encouraging or assisting serious self-harm will be treated as a priority offence for all users.
The change will trigger the strongest possible legal protections, compelling platforms to use cutting-edge technology to actively seek out and eliminate this content before it can reach users and cause irreparable harm, rather than simply reacting after someone has already been exposed to it.
Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said: “This government is determined to keep people safe online. Vile content that promotes self-harm continues to be pushed on social media and can mean potentially heart-wrenching consequences for families across the country.
“Our enhanced protections will make clear to social media companies that taking immediate steps to keep users safe from toxic material that could be the difference between life and death is not an option, but the law.”
«
The UK is already in a ferment about what can and can’t be said online, and what the role of the police is; in addition to the introduction of the OSA requiring age verification all over the place (with uneven effect). This is not going to improve things. The impact, when something dramatic blows up into a huge problem, is probably about six months away.
unique link to this extract
Strictly Come Dancing shake-up! BBC confirms major change to show’s voting system • Digital Spy via MSN
Stefania Sarrubba:
»
The BBC has announced a big change to Strictly Come Dancing and other shows’ voting system.
Weeks before Strictly returns for its new season, the BBC has shared that all voting will now take place online, as premium-rate phone voting has come to an end.
Strictly, as well as other shows like the Eurovision Song Contest, will continue welcoming online votes from viewers.
The BBC has noted that online voting was “the go-to choice” for most viewers, with the majority of votes for the last season of Strictly being cast online.
The broadcaster explained the decision to stop offering premium-rate phone voting, saying the system, run by phone company BT, is “outdated” and “expensive to run”.
Online-only voting can be done via your BBC account. The BBC encourages viewers to create an account, as having one offers a more personalised iPlayer experience and weather updates tailored to your location.
If you don’t have an account, you can sign up for one for free on the BBC website.
«
The premium-rate voting system did at least have the disadvantage that it was expensive to scam. This feels like it’s going to be relatively easy to scam.
unique link to this extract
In court filing, Google says the open web is in “rapid decline” • Ars Technica
Ryan Whitwam:
»
Is the web thriving or faltering? Google has an unexpected take in a new legal filing. Google is heading back to court soon in hopes of convincing a judge that it should not have to split up its ad business. The company lost its adtech antitrust case earlier this year, and now it’s up to the court to decide on remedies for the illegal conduct. In its response to the Department of Justice’s requested remedies, Google made a startling claim: “The fact is that today, the open web is already in rapid decline.”
Google says that forcing it to divest its AdX marketplace would hasten the demise of wide swaths of the web that are dependent on advertising revenue. This is one of several reasons Google asks the court to deny the government’s request. The DOJ also tried to force a divestment of Chrome in the search antitrust trial, but the judge in that case declined to order that in the remedies.
Google’s advertising business has turned it into an unrivaled Internet juggernaut. Google increasingly is the Internet—websites have no choice but to adhere to Google’s standards for search and ads because there’s no substantial competition. The court in this case ruled that in tying its display ad services with the AdX marketplace, Google suppressed the adoption of rival technologies, and this gave it an opportunity to preference its own services in ad auctions.
As users become increasingly frustrated with AI search products, Google often claims people actually love AI search and are sending as many clicks to the web as ever. Now that its golden goose is on the line, the open web is suddenly “in rapid decline.” It’s right there on page five of the company’s September 5 filing, as spotted by Search Engine Roundtable.
…Google’s position is that the entire passage is referring to open-web advertising rather than the open web itself. “Investments in non-open web display advertising like connected TV and retail media are growing at the expense of those in open web display advertising,” says Google.
«
Yeah, no. Is Google seriously saying that total advertising spend has peaked? That would be a hell of thing to tell people. The reality seems to be that advertising on the open web is falling, but that also means Google controls more of the places where advertising does happen. So its monopoly is stronger. The filing works against it.
unique link to this extract
EU fines Google nearly €3bn for “abusing” dominant position in ad tech • Associated Press via The Guardian
»
European Union regulators on Friday hit Google with a €2.95bn ($3.5bn) fine for breaching the bloc’s competition rules by favoring its own digital advertising services, marking the fourth such antitrust penalty for the company as well as a retreat from previous threats to break up the tech giant.
The European Commission, the 27-nation bloc’s executive branch and top antitrust enforcer, also ordered the US company to end its “self-preferencing practices” and take steps to stop “conflicts of interest” along the advertising technology supply chain.
The commission’s investigation found that Google had “abused” its dominant positions in the ad-technology ecosystem.
Google said the decision was “wrong” and that it would appeal. “It imposes an unjustified fine and requires changes that will hurt thousands of European businesses by making it harder for them to make money,” Lee-Anne Mulholland, the company’s global head of regulatory affairs, said in a statement.
The decision arrived more than two years after the European Commission announced antitrust charges against Google. The commission had said at the time that the only way to satisfy antitrust concerns about Google’s lucrative digital ad business was to sell off parts of its business. However, this decision marks a retreat from that earlier position and comes amid renewed tensions between Brussels and the Trump administration over trade, tariffs and technology regulation.
Top EU officials had said earlier that the commission was seeking a forced sale because past cases that ended with fines and requirements for Google to stop anti-competitive practices have not worked, allowing the company to continue its behavior in a different form.
«
The same case in the US came to the same conclusion about abuse of dominant position, which Google likewise said it would appeal.
unique link to this extract
The iPhone 17’s potential makeover might be just enough • The Verge
Allison Johnson:
»
I think five or seven years ago, the choice to buy an iPhone was more of an active one. People really liked what the iPhone offered — a robust app ecosystem, a streamlined operating system, and an excellent camera. But over the past decade, the list of things you “need” an iPhone for has gotten shorter as Android has caught up. You can even get a Pixel phone with what is essentially MagSafe these days.
To be sure, that’s partially the reality of a mature product category. The appearance of must-have upgrades has slowed down, and people are buying phones less frequently than they used to as a result. But even if the pace of innovation has declined and people are holding on to their phones longer, shouldn’t a phone that’s four or five years newer than the one you’re trading in feel like a real upgrade?
It looks like there’s good news on that front. Rumors point to some significant upgrades for the base model 17, like the long-awaited addition of a ProMotion screen. The features Apple has slowly trickled out over the last few years — Dynamic Island and Camera Control — haven’t exactly set the world on fire, but the compounding effect might make them feel like more substantial upgrades in the hands of, say, an iPhone 13 owner.
Beyond the base model, it seems that Apple is taking some bigger swings. Rumors point to a significant redesign for the Pro phones: the camera bump will stretch out, we’ll get a vibrant orange color option, and the Plus model will slim down into a strikingly thin iPhone Air.
«
Well, the event is happening today (6pm BST, 1pm EST, 10am PST) if you’re at all interested. But as this article admits, there’s basically no reason to upgrade your phone any more. The improvements are asymptotic; if you can tell the difference between phone from two random years within a five-year span, you’re doing well.
There will also be new AirPods and new Apple Watches. The thrill! I’ll go to the foot of our stairs!
unique link to this extract
Humans are being hired to make AI slop look less sloppy • NBC News
Angela Yang:
»
The same technology that was supposed to put graphic designer Lisa Carstens out of business is now keeping her busier than ever.
Carstens, a longtime freelancer based in Spain, spends a good portion of her day working with startups and individual clients looking to fix their botched attempts at artificial intelligence-generated logos.
The illustrations clients bring to her are commonly littered with unclean lines and nonsensical text, and they look like a mess of pixels when blown up beyond a certain size.
“There’s people that are aware AI isn’t perfect, and then there’s people that come to you angry because they didn’t manage to get it done themselves with AI,” Carstens said. “And you kind of have to be empathetic. You don’t want them to feel like idiots. Then you have to fix it.”
Such gigs are part of a new category of work spawned by the generative AI boom that threatened to displace creative jobs across the board: Anyone can now write blog posts, produce a graphic or code an app with a few text prompts, but AI-generated content rarely makes for a satisfactory final product on its own.
The issue has transformed the job market for many gig workers. Despite widespread concern that AI is replacing workers across industries, some are saying they’ve found new work as a result of AI’s incompetencies: Writers are asked to spruce up ChatGPT’s writing. Artists are being hired to patch up wonky AI images. Even software developers are tasked with fixing buggy apps coded by AI assistants.
«
The before-and-after of an AI-generated image really is something. The spelling alone is worth it.
Son of bat tunnel • The Value of Nothing
Martin Robbins on the bizarre stalling of a £200m relief road around Lincoln cause by.. bats. But: bats whose presence is uncertain:
»
Either way, £4.3m of public spending has been allocated to protect an unknown number of Barbastelles on the say-so of a piece of software, backed up by a single human report. That’s a lot of cash, so you would hope that the measures are proven and reliable, but that’s not actually the case.
Back in Norfolk again, which seems to be ground zero for England’s accidental war against the Barbastelle, similar bat protection measures were installed on the Norwich Northern Distributor Road at a cost of over £1m. A couple of years later, data on their effectiveness reached the BBC. It was not good: “none of the bridges was effective, with ecologists suggesting disturbance from the road may have driven the bats away.” A report issued by Norfolk County Council found that “just 13 bats crossed a £1.2m ‘green bridge’ during surveys.” Local populations of Barbastelles tagged with radio monitors had apparently just moved away.
That’s not surprising as Barbastelles are famously elusive, prefer woodland areas and avoid loud, bright, built-up environments. They are not fans of gentrification or major infrastructure projects. The most likely outcome of the North Hykeham Relief Road – a 70mph dual carriageway built across large open fields miles from any woodland – is that they simply feed elsewhere. If the goal was to help grow their population, the millions of pounds spent on bat bridges and culverts would have been better invested in new woodland habitats for them, away from major roads.
«
James O’Malley (a co-host of a podcast about how for God’s sake we should get more done in this country) has a post about a similar blocking of Getting Building Done near Cambridge.
For me, this adds up to a sclerosis in Britain’s ability to do anything, and it will have serious political ramifications. Robbins points this out too: Natural England, the government organisation which insisted on kid gloves for the bats, is part of the gigantic blockage which is frustrating people. Unless, of course, it’s stopping something they don’t like getting built. But then they wonder why living standards aren’t rising.
unique link to this extract
What if the AI stock market blows up? • The Economist
This might be Alex Hern, the AI correspondent at The Economist, wondering what happens if the AI boom is a bubble and bursts:
»
For now, the splurge looks fairly modest by historical standards. According to our most generous estimate, American AI firms have invested 3-4% of current American GDP over the past four years. British railway investment during the 1840s was around 15-20% of GDP. But if forecasts for data-centre construction are correct, that will change. What is more, an unusually large share of capital investment is being devoted to assets that depreciate quickly. Nvidia’s cutting-edge chips will look clunky in a few years’ time. We estimate that the average American tech firm’s assets have a shelf-life of just nine years, compared with 15 for telecoms assets in the 1990s.
Last is the question of who would bear the losses from a crash. Almost half the forthcoming $2.9trn in data-centre capex, Morgan Stanley reckons, will come from giant tech firms’ cashflows. These companies can borrow a lot more to fund their investments if they wish, since they have little existing debt. They make up about a fifth of the S&P 500 index’s market value, but as borrowers, they account for only 2% of the investment-grade bond market. Their balance-sheets look rock-solid.
The other big investors are likely to be insurance companies, pension schemes, sovereign-wealth funds and rich families. In August PIMCO, a big bond investor, and Blue Owl, a private-credit firm, funded Meta’s $29bn data-centre expansion in Louisiana. If the value of all AI investments went to zero such investors would suffer, but would be unlikely to bring down the financial system. Since American banks are not financing much of the AI boom themselves, their exposure to it is mostly indirect, through such non-bank lenders.
In another respect, though, America’s economy is in a historically unique position: individuals’ exposure to the stockmarket has never been so high. Ownership of stocks accounts for about 30% of the net worth of American households, compared with 26% in early 2000, at the peak of the dotcom bubble. Such ownership is concentrated among the rich, whose spending has powered economic growth of late.
«
So basically not too worried: it’ll be venture capitalists (and those who fund them) who will bear the brunt, on this reading.
unique link to this extract
Red Sea cable cuts disrupt internet across Asia and the Middle East • Reuters via The Japan Times
»
Internet connectivity in multiple countries, including India and Pakistan, has been affected due to subsea cable outages in the Red Sea, internet monitoring group Netblocks said.
Similar internet disruptions were also observed on Etilasat and Du networks in the United Arab Emirates, Netblocks said.
It was not immediately clear who was responsible for the damage, but Netblocks identified failures affecting cable systems near Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Microsoft on Saturday said its Microsoft Azure users may experience increased latency due to multiple undersea fiber cuts in the Red Sea.
The company said its users may experience service disruptions on traffic routes through the Middle East. Azure, the world’s second largest cloud provider after Amazon’s AWS, has rerouted traffic through alternative network paths, and network traffic is not interrupted.
“We do expect higher latency on some traffic that previously traversed through the Middle East. Network traffic that does not traverse through the Middle East is not impacted,” Microsoft said.
«
Coincidentally with all the failures affecting India and Pakistan, a number of the most annoying accounts on Twitter/X fell strangely silent.
unique link to this extract
| • Why do social networks drive us a little mad? • Why does angry content seem to dominate what we see? • How much of a role do algorithms play in affecting what we see and do online? • What can we do about it? • Did Facebook have any inkling of what was coming in Myanmar in 2016? Read Social Warming, my latest book, and find answers – and more. |
Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified










