Audiophiles are discovering cheap Raspberry Pi devices inside hugely expensive streaming devices. Are they being ripped off? CC-licensed photo by osde8info on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 9 links for you. All ears. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

“IG is a drug”: internal messages may doom Meta at social media addiction trial • Ars Technica

Ashley Belanger:

»

Anxiety, depression, eating disorders, and death. These can be the consequences for vulnerable kids who get addicted to social media, according to more than 1,000 personal injury lawsuits that seek to punish Meta and other platforms for allegedly prioritizing profits while downplaying child safety risks for years.

Social media companies have faced scrutiny before, with congressional hearings forcing CEOs to apologize, but until now, they’ve never had to convince a jury that they aren’t liable for harming kids.

This week, the first high-profile lawsuit—considered a “bellwether” case that could set meaningful precedent in the hundreds of other complaints—goes to trial. That lawsuit documents the case of a 19-year-old, K.G.M, who hopes the jury will agree that Meta and YouTube caused psychological harm by designing features like infinite scroll and autoplay to push her down a path that she alleged triggered depression, anxiety, self-harm, and suicidality.

TikTok and Snapchat were also targeted by the lawsuit, but both have settled. The Snapchat settlement came last week, while TikTok settled on Tuesday just hours before the trial started, Bloomberg reported.

For now, YouTube and Meta remain in the fight. K.G.M. allegedly started watching YouTube when she was six years old and joined Instagram by age 11. She’s fighting to claim untold damages—including potentially punitive damages—to help her family recoup losses from her pain and suffering and to punish social media companies and deter them from promoting harmful features to kids. She also wants the court to require prominent safety warnings on platforms to help parents be aware of the risks.

To avoid that, platforms have alleged that other factors caused K.G.M.’s psychological harm—like school bullies and family troubles—while insisting that Section 230 and the First Amendment protect platforms from being blamed for any harmful content targeted to K.G.M.

They also argued that K.G.M.’s mom never read the terms of service and, therefore, supposedly would not have benefited from posted warnings. And ByteDance, before settling, seemingly tried to pass the buck by claiming that K.G.M. “already suffered mental health harms before she began using TikTok.”

But the judge, Carolyn B. Kuhl, wrote in a ruling denying all platforms’ motions for summary judgment that K.G.M. showed enough evidence that her claims don’t stem from content to go to trial.

«

No clue on when this might come to trial, if ever. Nor is it clear whether TikTok and Snapchat settling will have any impact. The suspicion is that the other companies will settle too, which means that nothing comes to trial, which means that nothing becomes precedent or case law.
unique link to this extract

Moltbot, the AI agent that “actually does things”, is tech’s new obsession • The Verge

Emma Roth:

»

Federico Viticci at MacStories highlighted how he installed Moltbot on his M4 Mac Mini and transformed it into a tool that delivers daily audio recaps based on his activity in his calendar, Notion, and Todoist apps. Another person prompted Moltbot to give itself an animated face, and said it added a sleep animation without prompting.

Moltbot routes your request through the AI provider of your choice, such as OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google. Like many of the AI agents we’ve seen so far, Moltbot can fill out forms inside your browser, send emails for you, and manage your calendar — but it does so a lot more efficiently, at least according to some of the people using the tool.

There are some caveats, though; you can also give Moltbot permission to access your entire computer system, allowing it to read and write files, run shell commands, and execute scripts. Combining admin-level access to your device and your app credentials could pose major security risks if you’re not careful.

“If your autonomous AI Agent (like MoltBot) has admin access to your computer and I can interact with it by DMing you on social media, well now I can attempt to hijack your computer in a simple direct message,” Rachel Tobac, the CEO of SocialProof Security, says in an email to The Verge. “When we grant admin access to autonomous AI agents, they can be hijacked through prompt injection, a well-documented and not yet solved vulnerability.” A prompt injection attack occurs when a bad actor manipulates AI using malicious prompts, which they can either pose to a chatbot directly or embed inside a file, email, or webpage fed to a large language model.

«

People are doing deeply foolish things with these AI agents. Meredith Whittaker, CEO of the messaging app Signal, pointed to a post where someone claims to have created a “skill” for Claude which would in fact backdoor your computer. It’s like Windows XP and the virus explosion all over again.
unique link to this extract

Audiophiles keep finding a $40 computer board inside hi-fi streamers selling for thousands • Headphonesty

Alexandra Plesa:

»

If you browse audio forums, you might be familiar with this pattern. Someone opens a premium streamer and discovers that a Raspberry Pi sits inside. Occasionally, posters might frame these discoveries as proof that network streamers are unnecessarily expensive.

Bryston offers the clearest examples of this design approach. The BDP-π, which sold for $1,295 before being discontinued, used a Raspberry Pi with a HiFiBerry Digi+ HAT (a hardware accessory board). It delivered bit-perfect S/PDIF output and support up to 24-bit/192 kHz.

At the top of the lineup, Bryston’s $6,795 BR-20 includes a Raspberry Pi 4–based streaming module. That unit is part of a full DAC and preamp supporting high-resolution PCM and DSD playback.

Other manufacturers take a similar route:

• Orchard Audio’s $550 PecanPi Streamer runs on a Raspberry Pi 3B using Volumio
• Pi2Design’s $400-$450 Mercury V3 DAC is a Raspberry Pi 4–based streamer/DAC with AES, S/PDIF, and other digital outputs, plus an onboard DAC for analog output.

Raspberry Pi prices start at $35 for home use, so the difference might suggest that manufacturers are hiding something. After all, the same board used in DIY projects shows up in products that cost many times more.

Still, Bryston did not attempt to disguise the component, even going as far as naming a product the BDP-π. That openness shifts the discussion away from deception and leads to more questions. What does the Raspberry Pi do in a streamer, and what justifies the rest of the cost?

«

The answer turns out to be pretty simple:

»

In a modern system, the Raspberry Pi acts as a networked transport, so it’s not responsible for shaping the sound.

«

unique link to this extract

Expensive gas still biggest driver of high UK electricity bills, says UKERC • Carbon Brief

Simon Evans:

»

High gas prices are responsible for two-thirds of the rise in household electricity bills since before the global energy crisis, says the UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC).

The new analysis, from one of the UK’s foremost research bodies on energy, flatly contradicts widespread media and political narratives that misleadingly seek to blame climate policies for high bills.

Kaylen Camacho McCluskey, research assistant at UKERC, tells Carbon Brief that despite “misleading claims” about policy costs, gas prices are the main driver of high bills. She says: “While the story of what has driven up GB consumer electricity bills is often largely attributed to policy costs, our analysis shows that this is not the case. Volatile, gas-linked market prices – not green policies, as some misleading claims have suggested – dominate the real-terms increase in bills since 2021.”

In its 2025 review of UK energy policy, published today, UKERC says that annual electricity bills for typical households have risen by £166 since 2021.

It says that, after adjusting for inflation, some two-thirds of this increase (£112) is due to higher wholesale gas prices…UKERC estimates that, despite only supplying a third of the country’s electricity, gas-fired generators set the wholesale price of power around 90% of the time in 2025.

«

It’s hard though to see how this can be changed. If gas provides the marginal filler, and you can’t find a way to remove it from supply, then its cost will always determine electricity prices. The UKERC has some suggestions in the article, but they seem handwavy.
unique link to this extract

Global population living with extreme heat to double by 2050 • University of Oxford

»

A new University of Oxford study finds that almost half of the global population (3.79 billion) will be living with extreme heat by 2050 if the world reaches 2.0°C of global warming above pre-industrial levels – a scenario that climate scientists see as increasingly likely. 

Most of the impacts will be felt early on as the world passes the 1.5°C target set by the Paris Agreement, the authors warn. In 2010, 23% of the world’s population lived with extreme heat, and this is set to grow to 41% over the next decades.

Published in Nature Sustainability, the findings have grave implications for humanity. The Central African Republic, Nigeria, South Sudan, Laos, and Brazil are predicted to see the most significant increases in dangerously hot temperatures, while the largest affected populations will be in India, Nigeria, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and the Philippines.

Countries with colder climates will see a much larger relative change in uncomfortably hot days, more than doubling in some cases.

Compared with the 2006–2016 period, when the global mean temperature increase reached 1°C over pre-industrial levels, the study finds that warming to 2°C would lead to a doubling in Austria and Canada, 150% in the UK, Sweden, Finland, 200% in Norway, and a 230% increase in Ireland.

«

To consider: 2050 isn’t actually that far away. It’s 24 years, and I’d expect the majority of readers here still to be alive then.
unique link to this extract

Apple and its suppliers are counting the cost of iPhone Air failure • Culpium

Tim Culpan is a former Bloomberg technology reporter in Taiwan with many excellent contacts among its suppliers:

»

Apple and its suppliers are now stuck with components for up to 1.5 million units of iPhone Air, my sources tell me, even after the order came down in October to cut back production. What’s worse, some of that cannot be repurposed and instead may need to be scrapped, I am told. To be clear, that doesn’t mean 1.5 million iPhones will be scrapped, merely some of the components specific to the iPhone Air.

Apple will release earnings this week, but it’s unlikely Tim Cook and his team will discuss the issue. Apple’s CEO dodged the question of Air’s poor sales last quarter, and instead chose to talk up the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 — a tacit admission that Air was a dud.

My own analysis, based on what cannot be re-used, puts the write-off into the low hundreds of millions of dollars. Frankly, that’s not a big deal: iPhone sales were $49bn in the three months to Sept. 27, and are expected to be around $80bn for the December quarter.

The bigger issue is how Apple failed to understand its own customers, and how this mess will ripple through the supply chain. I am told that while some vendors will be stuck with a bill, Apple itself will soak up most of the cost.

…The OLED “Super Retina XDR” screen is basically the same across all models, but the Air’s 6.5-inch size is mid-way between the 6.9-inch and 6.3-inch versions. I am told that displays which have already been cut, framed and put onto modules will need to be scrapped, though some of that will also be crushed, separated, and recycled.

Possibly the biggest hurt could be with the chips. Apple uses the same A19 Pro CPU in the Air as it does with the iPhone 17 Pro. But the Air has only 5 GPU cores — as does the base iPhone 17 — while the iPhone 17 Pro has 6 GPU cores. (To be blunt, this is merely chip binning, not a new chip).

As a result, the unused Air chips cannot be put in the the lower-end base iPhone 17 nor in the higher-end iPhone 17 Pro. They cannot be repurposed. Even worse, the Air has 12GB of DRAM while the baseline iPhone 17 has just 8GB, according to TrendForce. So, any processor modules which have already had their DRAM fused onto the CPU would also result in wasted DRAM — unless Apple and TSMC find some magical way to “unfuse” the memory from the base die.

«

Those millions of modules of DRAM that have gone to waste will really stick in the craw of Cook, who of course abhors waste. Speaking of whom…
unique link to this extract

Aside from that, Mr. Cook, what did you think of the movie? • Spyglass

MG Siegler:

»

Tim Cook is captured. There is simply no other explanation for his actions over the past year or so. But it perhaps culminated this weekend when Cook went to a special private showing of the documentary Melania [I think that should be “documentary” – Overspill Ed] at the White House. Yes, that Melania. That in and of itself would have probably been fine. I mean, it’s potentially problematic for a host of reasons that I’ll get to, but such is our world right now. Then one shot – a gunshot – turned attending that movie screening into a statement…

While Cook was enjoying his popcorn and champagne with the likes of Mike Tyson, Tony Robbins, and other “VIPs”, it was complete and utter chaos on the streets of Minnesota. Just hours earlier, Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse, was shot and killed by ICE agents. Maybe, just maybe, postpone the movie premiere?

Of course, President Trump was never going to do that because the official White House stance is that Pretti was a “domestic terrorist” and the agents were acting in self defense. And never mind that this was the second such murder in the past 17 days, the show must go on!

But it didn’t have to for Cook. He could have, and should have, backed out of the event. Obviously. The fact that he didn’t either suggests horrible judgement on his part or worse, cowardice. This is a man and leader of one of the biggest and most important businesses in the world who had long been thought to have a great moral compass.

He has lost his way.

«

Among longtime Apple fans, there is now simply a revulsion at Cook’s fealty towards Trump. The idea – which Cook put forward in an internal memo to Apple staff this week – that he can influence Trump by being there is discounted. Why should Trump listen to someone who, in effect, has no leverage over him, but over whom Trump has enormous leverage through tariffs?
unique link to this extract

How Olympic athletes stay healthy during cold and flu season • Outside Online

Alex Hutchinson:

»

Even if you’re really good at avoiding exposure, you’ll encounter some germs eventually—and when you do, you’ll hope that your immune system can deal with them. Getting a flu shot is a good start, as is taking care of basics like getting enough sleep. Jooste points out that athletes are two to three times more likely to pick up an infection when they travel across more than five time zones.

But it’s not just sleep: immune function is also suppressed by stress. In athletes, that can take the form of hard training, but more general life stress also plays a role. In a study published last fall by Sophie Harrison of the University of Bangor, for example, runners who reported higher levels of anxiety were more likely to pick up a respiratory infection in the weeks following a marathon. It’s not always easy to dial back stress in our lives, but understanding its potential consequences is a good motivator to take it seriously.

There are also a near-infinite number of supplements that claim to boost immune function. Few have much evidence behind them, but two that Jooste and his colleagues highlight are vitamin D and probiotics. I’ve generally found the evidence in favor of vitamin D as a sports supplement to be unclear, but keeping your levels above the “deficient” threshold does seem like a good idea. For probiotics, they suggest multi-strain combinations of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium at a dose of at least 1 billion CFU per day.

If the first two strategies—avoiding exposure and boosting immunity—fail, then your last hope is to fight an infection as soon as it takes hold. At the 2018 Olympics, the Finnish team took an aggressive approach to identifying and immediately fighting infections, and subsequently detailed the results in a journal paper. (My favorite nugget from that study was that they tracked how infections spread on the flights to South Korea, and found that sitting in business class was the best way to stay healthy and avoid passing an infection on to others.)

«

For this reason I will insist on business class seating in travelling to future commissions.
unique link to this extract

AI chatbots are infiltrating social-science surveys — and getting better at avoiding detection • Nature

Sara Phillips:

»

In November, Sean Westwood, a political scientist at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire, demonstrated an AI chatbot that can reliably impersonate a human participant and evade most known mechanisms built into surveys to detect fake responses1.

Westwood used OpenAI’s o4-mini, an AI-based reasoning tool, to build a bot and set it loose on a survey that he designed for the purpose of testing it. In 6,700 tests, the bot managed to pass standard ‘attention check’ questions (which are designed to catch inattentive humans and simple bots) 99.8% of the time.

To help it evade detection, the bot could be programmed with a persona and use reasoning in line with that persona. For example, when it was programmed to answer as an 88-year-old woman and was asked about time spent at children’s sporting events, the bot said that it spent little time at them because its children had grown up. And it remembered its answers to previous questions.

Westwood’s bot also breezed past common questions that are placed into surveys to trip up bots by detecting capabilities that most people do not have. The bot declined to translate a sentence into Mandarin, for example, and it pretended it could not quote the US constitution verbatim.

The ease with which it evaded detection led Constantine Papas, a blogger and user-experience researcher at a big technology firm based in New York, to declare a “scientific validity crisis”. He wrote that “the foundational assumption of survey research (that a coherent response is a human response) is no longer tenable”.

«

The rest of the article is paywalled, but you get the idea already: surveys can’t be relied on any more. An obvious question is whether we can rely any longer on polling data, so much of which now comes from online surveys (because people won’t pick up the phone to pollsters).
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

A flaw in a widely used parking ticket system software gave a programmer access to the locations of thousands of citations – and their details. CC-licensed photo by Rachel Knickmeyer on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 9 links for you. Not moving. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

Anthropic ‘destructively’ scanned millions of books to build Claude • The Washington Post

Aaron Schaffer, Will Oremus and Nitasha Tiku:

»

In early 2024, executives at artificial intelligence start-up Anthropic ramped up an ambitious project they sought to keep quiet. “Project Panama is our effort to destructively scan all the books in the world,” an internal planning document unsealed in legal filings last week said. “We don’t want it to be known that we are working on this.”

Within about a year, according to the filings, the company had spent tens of millions of dollars to acquire and slice the spines off millions of books, before scanning their pages to feed more knowledge into the AI models behind products such as its popular chatbot, Claude.

Details of Project Panama, which have not been previously reported, emerged in more than 4,000 pages of documents in a copyright lawsuit brought by book authors against Anthropic, which has been valued by investors at $183bn. The company agreed to pay $1.5bn to settle the case in August, but a district judge’s decision last week to unseal a slew of documents in the case more fully revealed Anthropic’s zealous pursuit of books.

The new documents, along with earlier filings in other copyright cases against AI companies, show the lengths to which tech firms such as Anthropic, Meta, Google and OpenAI went to obtain colossal troves of data with which to “train” their software.

…In June, District Judge William Alsup found that Anthropic was within its rights to use books for training AI models because they process the material in a “transformative” way. He likened the AI training process to teachers “training schoolchildren to write well.” The same month, District Judge Vince Chhabria found in the Meta case that the book authors had failed to show that the company’s AI models could harm sales of their books.

But companies can still get in trouble for how they went about acquiring books. In Anthropic’s case, the book-scanning project passed muster, but the judge found that the company may have infringed on authors’ copyright when it downloaded millions of pirated books free before launching Project Panama.

«

This is the problem that publishers and authors face: judges keep saying that the process of ingesting the books as “training” isn’t, per se, illegal, because what is done is transformative. Seems hard to argue against.

unique link to this extract

AI: the wrong kind of bubble • Breadcrumb.vc

Sameer Singh:

»

This post is bit of a history lesson, but an important one. Lately, there has been a lot of discussion about “productive” bubbles in technology — manias that focus capital and talent around a vision of the future. The argument is that bubbles create critical infrastructure that entrepreneurs leverage after the crash — the dotcom bubble is a key example. This is an oversimplified view of bubbles. All technology bubbles are not necessarily “productive”. They don’t always create infrastructure that is used after the bubble. Let’s take a look at whether this applies to the current AI bubble — and it is one, despite real utility.

…Why do I think AI is part of the maturity phase and not a whole new cycle? Simple, it carries all the hallmarks of a maturity innovation (h/t to Jerry Neumann) — the biggest incumbents in the technology world immediately jumped on it and adoption was lightning fast as the internet is already fully diffused. Whole new technology cycles begin on the fringes with hobbyists — like unknown nerds creating the Apple I. That is absolutely not what we’re seeing with AI.

A key takeaway from this model is that technology diffusion causes not one, but two types of financial excess — a mid-cycle bubble during the Frenzy phase and a late-cycle bubble during the Maturity phase. The two types of bubbles are strikingly clear in the chart below [in original article]. The chart shows the Shiller PE Ratio, also known as the Cyclically Adjusted PE Ratio (CAPE Ratio), for the S&P 500 over the past 150 years. This ratio swaps out one year earnings (the E in the PE Ratio) with 10 year average inflation adjusted earnings to smooth out temporary fluctuations and account for business cycles (earnings can also be inflated during bubbles).

…a late-cycle (Maturity) bubble looks very different. At this stage, the technology has won and the dominant companies of the era are so entrenched that they are thought to be infallible. It is this belief that leads to another wave of speculative excess and overinvestment.

Any new technology breakthroughs are adopted at lightning speed. The incumbents begin to invest aggressively to harness its potential and strengthen their positions. The strong cash position of established companies leads to a heavy amount of financial engineering. Exuberance also leads to risky debt issuances. This is exactly what is happening with AI — rapid adoption, aggressive investments from incumbents like Google, financial engineering with Nvidia investing in companies that buy its products, and companies like Oracle and Coreweave taking on unprecedented levels of high-risk debt to finance data center construction. The presence of companies with real earnings makes this bubble less violent on the upswing, but no less speculative.

«

unique link to this extract

OpenAI aims to ship its first device in 2026, and it could be earbuds • TechCrunch

Ivan Mehta:

»

Last November, Sam Altman described the potential device to be more “peaceful and calm” than iPhones. Previous reporting suggests the company wants to build a screen-free and pocketable device.

While the company is not spilling any details, more recent reporting from Asian publications and leakers suggests OpenAI’s first device could be a pair of earbuds. According to reports, this device is codenamed “Sweet Pea” and will have a unique design as compared to existing earbuds. The earbuds could work on a custom 2nm processor and handle AI tasks locally instead of sending requests to the cloud.

A separate report from a large Taiwanese newspaper noted that OpenAI was exploring a partnership with China-based Luxshare for manufacturing, but might eventually lean in favor of Taiwan’s Foxconn. The report also said in the first year of sales, OpenAI aims to ship 40 to 50 million units.

OpenAI’s ChatGPT has nearly a billion weekly users, but the company has to rely on other devices and platforms for distribution. With its own device, it might want to take more control of the development and distribution of the AI assistant and also release exclusive and purpose-built features.

However, replacing existing earbuds like AirPods in users’ daily lives is going to be challenging if there’s not a strong integration with operating systems.

Until now, there hasn’t been a standout AI device success story.

«

It still feels a little too early for AI device success stories, not because the tech isn’t advancing fast, but because errors are always going to be part of their response (doing nothing is actually better than doing the wrong thing) and because it’s going to be hard to get them to scale if people are wearing and using them all the time.
unique link to this extract

Does evidence even matter? • On my Om

Om Malik:

»

A smile is a smile in Chinese, Hindi, Portuguese, Spanish, and English. The emotional payload is universal. The visual web was emerging as a universal language. Photos were becoming the atomic unit of social platforms. I was excited. Millions of vantage points were creating a collective sight. I asked: How can we create a way for visuals to tell the near history of our time?

Minnesota is answering that question, and I don’t like what I see.

Cameras are everywhere. More than a billion surveillance cameras are installed worldwide. Last year, 1.2 billion smartphones with cameras were shipped. Two trillion photos are taken each year. In Minneapolis bystanders filmed everything. Reuters verified the footage, as did the BBC, the Wall Street Journal, and the Associated Press. The visual record is unambiguous. It contradicts the official story completely. Yet the official story continues.

I was right about cameras democratizing witnessing. Anyone can document reality. We bypassed gatekeepers. But I was wrong about accountability. I thought seeing would create it. I thought evidence would force consensus. That shared visual reality would make it harder to lie. The assumption was simple: if enough people saw the same thing, power couldn’t ignore it. Minnesota proved me wrong.

I keep thinking about The Circle, a wonderful book by Dave Eggers. It imagines a world dominated by one company, loosely modeled on Facebook, where cameras record everything and no one even pretends otherwise. “Secrets are lies,“ the company insists, and total transparency is sold as moral progress. This is the kind of nonsense I believed in my younger days.

In The Circle, a man is hunted in real time by crowdsourced tracking. The footage is not denied. It is reinterpreted, and it eventually loses moral weight. Truth does not disappear; it drowns in commentary, metrics, and ephemera. In 1984, George Orwell wrote, “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.” Together, Eggers and Orwell reach the same unsettling conclusion. The crisis is no longer whether technology can show us what happened; it is whether society is still willing to believe its own eyes.

«

Our tribalism outweighs our rationality. It always has, but it has now reached a pitch where a few people can force our tribalism to do that again and again.
unique link to this extract

All Your Parking Tickets Are Belong to Me • Jack’s Blog

Jack Lafond realised there was an API which would let him figure out where every parking ticket in the US issued using a particular company’s software (Passport Parking) was issued. After being ignored, he decided to try to attract their attention by.. showing it:

»

Like any great chaos engineer, I decided to build a frontend to visualize the data, which is the magnum opus of this entire research project: parking.exposed is now live and visualizes a great deal of tickets that I’ve been able to collect over the last week or so. After fiddling around with ticket IDs I’ve managed to get within a 6 to 12 hour range of recently written tickets.

There’s a great heatmap visualization that allows you to see where tickets are primarily clustered. Unfortunately, ticket operators aren’t required to put in the location of where tickets are written, which meant I had to use some geocoding magic to try and figure it out. I’d say a good percentage are correct, but if you see big clusters in random areas (like the water) don’t blame me!

My personal favorite feature is the Pay Now button. Because I have the data of the city and the associated payment subdomain, you theoretically could pay someone’s parking ticket for them!

The site’s is live and is constantly refreshing, so if you want to see tickets stream in on the stats page that’s absolutely an option. It was such a blast building this and really puts into perspective the magnitude of this issue.

In an ideal world, someone from Passport Parking will reach out to me after this is published and I can finally get a response from them on working to fix the issue.

«

So far (five days later) no update, but plenty of time.
unique link to this extract

China’s labs pull ahead as global drugmakers invest in biotech pioneers • Financial Times

Aanu Adeoye and Patrick Temple-West:

»

Investors in western biotechs face the prospect of lower valuations as Chinese start-ups attract growing investment from global drugmakers looking to replenish their pipelines.

China has emerged in recent years as a hub for drug development, particularly early-stage candidates, with faster timelines allowing companies to reach proof of concept ahead of western rivals.

Because the country’s biotechs can run clinical trials more quickly and cheaply, rivals from elsewhere risk being “undercut in licensing or partnering discussions”, said Oliver Kenyon, senior director at life sciences investor RTW.

This was particularly the case for “fairly crowded therapeutic areas”, he added, noting the trend “might compress long-term returns” for investors.

“Chinese biotech clearly represents a structural shift in global drug development,” Kenyon said. “We don’t think it’s a cyclical phenomenon . . . they’re here to stay.”

Historically, China was known for its ability to quickly replicate new drugs developed elsewhere.

While that is still the case, Chinese groups are also developing new therapies. They are taking the lead, for example, on antibody-drug conjugates, which use antibodies to deliver chemotherapy in a much more targeted way.

Chinese companies account for more than half of new ADC drugs in early clinical trials, according to consultancy McKinsey. They are also making strides in developing next-generation Car-T treatments for autoimmune diseases, and small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapies. These can temporarily turn off harmful genes.

«

That point about running clinical trials faster and cheaper is unexplained, but has a hint of not quite going by the regulatory principles used in the West.
unique link to this extract

It’s time to think about 6G – yes, really • Light Reading

Anne Morris:

»

Right up until the very end of 2025, Red Hat’s Fran Heeran said he was still apologizing whenever he mentioned 6G in a conversation because there was “always that belief in the room that, yes, this is premature. Why … are we mentioning 6G when … we’re still going through the 5G Advanced phase?” – and what about the business case, too?

Now, he appears certain that 6G will become a mainstream conversation in 2026 and 2027, “whereas up until now, perhaps it was a little bit scary, given where we were with 5G.”

Heeran, a former Nokia and Vodafone executive who now holds the title of vice president and head of global telecom business at the open-source solutions specialist, was chatting to Gabriel Brown, senior principal analyst covering mobile networks at Omdia, during the opening session of Light Reading’s Telecom Trends, Digital Symposium, 2026 edition.

Titled the “Network Evolution Path from 5G to 6G,” the session explored the current state of play with 6G standards and more besides, in an attempt to build a picture of how the transition to 6G is currently playing out.

Brown himself echoed Heeran’s view that 6G is coming sooner than people might think. “Why do we actually need this? … I think it’s a pretty simple story,” he said.

“Most obviously, we have a chance to create a really amazing mobile communication system. 5G is great, but there’s a lot we can do better … it’s a fantastic opportunity,” he said.

«

I’m old enough to remember when 5G was going to bring us cars that would talk to each other on the road about traffic, and broadband everywhere wirelessly. Somehow that hasn’t happened? Or has it, but people just want a bigger number all the time?
unique link to this extract

New Iran videos show bodies piled up in hospital and snipers on roofs • BBC

Merlyn Thomas and Shayan Sardarizadeh:

»

Verified videos emerging from Iran show bodies piled up in a hospital, snipers stationed on buildings and CCTV cameras being destroyed, following the unprecedented crackdown on protests earlier this month.

BBC Verify has been tracking the spread of protests across Iran since they first erupted in late December, but the near total internet blackout imposed by the authorities has made it extremely difficult to document the scale of the state’s deadly crackdown on protesters.

The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) says it has confirmed the killing of nearly 6,000 people, including 5,633 protesters, since the unrest began at the end of December. It says it is also currently investigating another 17,000 reported deaths received despite an internet shutdown after nearly three weeks.

Another group, the Norway-based Iran Human Rights (IHR), has warned that the final toll could exceed 25,000.

Iranian authorities said last week that more than 3,100 people were killed, but that the majority were security personnel or bystanders attacked by “rioters”.

The latest videos to emerge from the country are understood to have been filmed on 8 and 9 January, when thousands of people took to the streets following a call for nationwide protests from Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of the late Shah.

They are thought to be the deadliest nights for protesters so far and these newly verified videos show how Iran’s security forces have been violently cracking down on protesters.

«

Some videos do trickle out, but this is far from the observation we would like to have.
unique link to this extract

Death of an Indian tech worker • Rest Of World

Parth MN:

»

Eighty-three% of India’s tech workers suffer from burnout, according to one recent survey. One in four clocks over 70 hours a week. In Karnataka state, home to Bengaluru, tech workers account for a starkly disproportionate 20% of patients seeking transplants due to organ failure, according to a leading regional newspaper. A study of tech employees in the IT hub of Hyderabad found that 84% had a liver disease linked to long hours of sedentary work and high stress.

Some of India’s tech leaders, meanwhile, are advocating 70-hour and even 90-hour workweeks, instead of the national legal maximum of 48.

IT workers in the World Trade Centre tower in Bengaluru. Sameer Raichur for Rest of World
Tech workers paint a picture of mounting anxiety. From junior software engineers to senior project managers, workers at firms across the industry told Rest of World they were buckling under the burden of deadlines. They had little time for themselves or their families, and worried about layoffs. Most said they feared conditions would only worsen with the rise of AI.

The fate of India’s tech workers may foreshadow the future of a global workforce reckoning with the advent of AI. For decades, the country’s massive pool of outsourced tech workers have helped power global tech giants — the U.S. accounts for 62% of India’s IT outsourcing revenue. As employees worry that AI will threaten their jobs and demands for efficiency rise, an industry long known for 24/7 schedules and intense workloads is reaching a breaking point.

«

unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Asking ChatGPT’s new Health system to evaluate your cardiac health based on Apple Watch data might not give a useful answer. CC-licensed photo by Forth With Life on Flickr.

A selection of 9 links for you. Arresting. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

The Windows PC is dying, thanks to cloud-based services and AI • Computerworld

Steven Vaughan-Nichols:

»

For years, I’ve been watching the slow evolution of classic Windows PCs into cloud-based Windows and Office services. Sure, you can still buy a PC with Windows on it, but you’re not really “buying” Windows as much as renting it. 

Windows cloud PCs have gone from Microsoft’s side project to the centerpiece of its post‑Windows‑10 strategy. But the story in 2026 is less “death of the PC” and more “merger of PC, cloud, and AI under Microsoft’s terms.” Today, the most interesting question is not whether Windows moves to the cloud, but how much local control users are willing to surrender in exchange for AI‑infused desktops.

For the longest time, Microsoft had planned on the Windows 365 Cloud PC to shift users from a PC‑centric world to Desktop‑as‑a‑Service, with Windows 11 acting as the on‑ramp. Microsoft’s own internal slideware later made that explicit: the plan is to “move Windows 11 increasingly to the cloud… to enable a full Windows operating system streamed from the cloud to any device.” What started as the Business and Enterprise editions of Windows 365, running on Azure with per‑user monthly pricing in the $30-to-$60 range, has since been productized and polished as if it were the “real” Windows roadmap rather than a side hustle.

Other harbingers included Windows 365 Boot, which bypassed the local operating system entirely and dropped you straight into a personalized cloud desktop on shared or BYOD hardware. And Windows 365 Switch blurs the boundary between local and hosted sessions, turning a cloud PC into “just another desktop.” 

At the same time, Windows App enables you to run Azure Virtual Desktop, Windows 365, Microsoft Dev Box, Remote Desktop Services, and remote PCs from, well, pretty much any computing device. Specifically, you can use Windows App to run Windows on Macs, iPhones, iPads, other Windows machines, even in web browsers. That last means you can now run Windows on Linux-powered PCs, Chromebooks, and Android phones and tablets. 

Heck, you can even run Windows using a Meta Quest VR headset! 

A funny thing happened on the way to this cloud-based subscription service. AI came along. Microsoft, which has gone whole-hog into AI — if I see one more Copilot tie-in, I’m going to scream — decided that AI PCs would be the future. It’s wrong. As Kevin Terwilliger, Dell’s head of product, said of PC customers, “They’re not buying based on AI. I think AI probably confuses them more than it helps them.” (Ya think?)

«

But as Vaughan-Nichols points out, the corollary of the expensive PC going away is subscriptions coming in, which eat away at your wallet quietly rather than when you first get into the store.
unique link to this extract

Data center power outage took out TikTok first weekend under US ownership • Ars Technica

Ashley Belanger:

»

TikTok has been glitching for US users since Sunday, and TikTok’s new US owners have finally confirmed the cause: a power outage at a US data center.

“Since yesterday we’ve been working to restore our services following a power outage at a US data center impacting TikTok and other apps we operate,” the TikTok USDS Joint Venture posted on X on Monday morning. “We’re working with our data center partner to stabilize our service. We’re sorry for this disruption and hope to resolve it soon.”

A DownDetector report tracking outages showed problems began early Sunday morning, with the majority of problems seemingly resolved by early Monday. However, The Verge reported that some US users continue to experience issues, including issues logging in, long delays uploading videos, generic content flooding For You pages, problems accessing comments, and other issues.

It’s clear that the TikTok USDS Joint Venture is still working to resolve problems connected to the power outage. But their decision to remain silent while the app got buggy during the first weekend under the control of right-wing US owners hand-picked by Donald Trump sparked conspiracy theories on social media that the app had begun censoring left-leaning users.

As the app comes back online, users have also taken note that TikTok is collecting more of their data under US control. As Wired reported, TikTok asked US users to agree to a new terms of service and privacy policy, which allows TikTok to potentially collect “more detailed information about its users, including precise location data.”

“Before this update, the app did not collect the precise, GPS-derived location data of US users,” Wired reported. “Now, if you give TikTok permission to use your phone’s location services, then the app may collect granular information about your exact whereabouts.”

New policies also pushed users to agree to share all their AI interactions, which allows TikTok to store their metadata and trace AI inputs back to specific accounts.

«

Some people are also reporting that videos about incidents involving ICE or mention of the word “Epstein” result in their videos getting zero views or being censored – though these might be teething problems. Give it a week.
unique link to this extract

Britain’s weirdest detour • The Value of Nothing

Martin Robbins:

»

When a road collapsed in rural Lincolnshire recently, badgers were the least of people’s problems. The council had failed to take action for at least two or three years, but the moment they decided to fix the road they were halted by friends of the ‘stack Natural England. Still, at least the council could put a sensible detour in place. Right? Right?! Find out the whole story in the film…

«

Robbins is very much tongue-in-cheek when he calls Natural England a friend of his Substack: in reality they provide him with a punching bag, deservedly – as evidenced by the clip he briefly shows of a newspaper headline saying “Natural England opposes its own plans for Cornwall development”.

It’s a short video (12 minutes), nicely put together, and he’s very good with a drone shot. You do also get to the end with a sort of hair-tearing frustration at why nothing seems to work, and nobody seems minded to fix it.
unique link to this extract

This ingenious camera system is changing live sports forever • Fast Company

Adam Bluestein:

»

Several times during the men’s final of the Madrid Open tennis tournament between Casper Ruud and Jack Draper last spring, TV viewers were treated to a remarkable camera perspective. They watched the match from just behind the baseline, effortlessly following the player’s movement step for step, capturing every shot from the perfect angle. 

With no discernible blur or delays, the smoothly flowing live footage had the hyperreal feel of a video game. 

“I love the footwork by the cameraman,” wrote one YouTube commenter. 

The company now uses the comment in its investor pitch deck. 

In reality, these uncanny tracking shots didn’t involve any human camera operators at all. No robotic cameras or drones, either. Instead they were generated, in real time, with a software-based camera system developed by startup Muybridge, based in Oslo.

Founded by Håkon Espeland and Anders Tomren in 2020, Muybridge has spent nearly five years developing real-time computer vision technology that uses software to create a “weightless” camera, with no moving parts, that captures the speed and motion of live sports in a way that our eyes aren’t accustomed to. In the coming year, viewers of televised sports will get to see many more of these revelatory perspectives—both in tennis and beyond.

…Instead of using big, expensive cameras that you move to “chase” whatever’s happening on the court or sports field, Muybridge puts hundreds of small, inexpensive video sensors all over the place—and uses software to create smooth tracking shots and conjure any angle on demand.

«

It is indeed very impressive – see the link to the website to get an idea of the footage. The cameras are installed at a little above head height and look like speaker bars. (Fun task: identify the players on the three clips at the Muybridge website link. Answers at the bottom of this post.)

Of course one wonders whether a certain fruit-named company might see this and think it’s worth incorporating it.. no, that’s crazy talk.
unique link to this extract

Iran is building a two-tier internet that locks 85 million citizens out of the global web • Rest of World

Indranil Ghosh:

»

Iran’s near-total communications blackout has entered its 16th day, but that’s just a live test.

Following a repressive crackdown on protests, the government is now building a system that grants web access only to security-vetted elites, while locking 90 million citizens inside an intranet.

Government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani confirmed international access will not be restored until at least late March. Filterwatch, which monitors Iranian internet censorship from Texas, cited government sources, including Mohajerani, saying access will “never return to its previous form.”

This is what makes Iran’s attempt unique: Other authoritarian states built walls before their populations went online. Iran is trying to seal off a connected economy already in freefall. 

The system is called Barracks Internet, according to confidential planning documents obtained by Filterwatch. Under this architecture, access to the global web will be granted only through a strict security whitelist.

“The regime is terrified of one thing: Iranians being heard telling their own truth and having crimes documented,” Mahsa Alimardani, a digital rights researcher at U.S.-based Witness, which trains activists to use video for advocacy, told Rest of World. “The question becomes: How do we give Iranians an unbreakable voice?”

The idea of tiered internet access is not new in Iran. Since at least 2013, the regime has quietly issued “white SIM cards,” giving unrestricted global internet access to approximately 16,000 people. The system gained public attention in November 2025 when X’s location feature revealed that certain accounts, including the communications minister, were connecting directly from inside Iran, despite X being blocked since 2009.

What is different now is scale and permanence. The current blackout tests infrastructure designed to make two-tier access the default, not a temporary crackdown.

Only a handful of nations have attempted to wall off their citizens from the global internet. North Korea’s Kwangmyong intranet was built from scratch for a population that never had connectivity. China constructed its Great Firewall over two decades while nurturing domestic alternatives such as WeChat and Alibaba. Iran is attempting to do both in weeks, with no domestic alternatives.

«

The modern equivalent of the Iron Curtain.
unique link to this extract

CATL launches 1st sodium-ion battery for light commercial vehicles • CnEVPost

Phate Zhang:

»

CATL has launched a sodium-ion battery for light commercial vehicles, aiming for mass adoption of this new battery type this year.

The Chinese battery giant rolled out its Tectrans II series power batteries at an event on Thursday, primarily targeting light commercial vehicles.

The series’ low-temperature variant is a sodium-ion battery, which CATL said is the industry’s first mass-produced sodium battery for light commercial vehicles, engineered for extreme cold environments.

The sodium battery pack has a capacity of 45 kWh and targets small vans and micro trucks. The battery pack can still be plugged in and charged in extreme cold conditions of -30°C. At -40°C, the battery retains 90% of its usable capacity, according to the company.

This marks CATL’s first major move in the sodium-ion battery sector this year. In 2026, sodium batteries will see large-scale adoption in battery swapping, passenger vehicles, commercial vehicles, and energy storage, CATL said at a supplier conference held in its headquarters city of Ningde, Fujian on December 28.

Sodium-ion batteries and lithium-ion batteries are poised to form a “dual-star” trend, CATL noted at the time. Beyond the sodium battery, the Tectrans II series includes an ultra-fast charging variant capable of charging from 20% to 80% in 30 minutes at -15°C.

«

This might seem a bit boring, but it’s so important to have low-temperature function for electric vehicles, and especially for light commercial ones.
unique link to this extract

Trump’s Department of Transport plans to use Google Gemini AI to write regulations • ProPublica

Jesse Coburn:

»

The Trump administration is planning to use artificial intelligence to write federal transportation regulations, according to U.S. Department of Transportation records and interviews with six agency staffers.

The plan was presented to DOT staff last month at a demonstration of AI’s “potential to revolutionize the way we draft rulemakings,” agency attorney Daniel Cohen wrote to colleagues. The demonstration, Cohen wrote, would showcase “exciting new AI tools available to DOT rule writers to help us do our job better and faster.”

Discussion of the plan continued among agency leadership last week, according to meeting notes reviewed by ProPublica. Gregory Zerzan, the agency’s general counsel, said at that meeting that President Donald Trump is “very excited about this initiative.” Zerzan seemed to suggest that the DOT was at the vanguard of a broader federal effort, calling the department the “point of the spear” and “the first agency that is fully enabled to use AI to draft rules.”

Zerzan appeared interested mainly in the quantity of regulations that AI could produce, not their quality. “We don’t need the perfect rule on XYZ. We don’t even need a very good rule on XYZ,” he said, according to the meeting notes. “We want good enough.” Zerzan added, “We’re flooding the zone.” 

These developments have alarmed some at DOT. The agency’s rules touch virtually every facet of transportation safety, including regulations that keep airplanes in the sky, prevent gas pipelines from exploding and stop freight trains carrying toxic chemicals from skidding off the rails. Why, some staffers wondered, would the federal government outsource the writing of such critical standards to a nascent technology notorious for making mistakes?

«

At this point the relevant question becomes: will the AI make more or fewer mistakes than the Trump staffers? If their standard isn’t perfect or very good, just “good enough”, you could argue that it won’t matter if the rules contain mistakes, because they’re being intentionally sloppy.
unique link to this extract

The Adolescence of Technology • Dario Amodei

Dario Amodei:

»

There is a scene in the movie version of Carl Sagan’s book Contact where the main character, an astronomer who has detected the first radio signal from an alien civilization, is being considered for the role of humanity’s representative to meet the aliens. The international panel interviewing her asks, “If you could ask [the aliens] just one question, what would it be?”

Her reply is: “I’d ask them, ‘How did you do it? How did you evolve, how did you survive this technological adolescence without destroying yourself?” When I think about where humanity is now with AI—about what we’re on the cusp of—my mind keeps going back to that scene, because the question is so apt for our current situation, and I wish we had the aliens’ answer to guide us.

I believe we are entering a rite of passage, both turbulent and inevitable, which will test who we are as a species. Humanity is about to be handed almost unimaginable power, and it is deeply unclear whether our social, political, and technological systems possess the maturity to wield it.

In my essay Machines of Loving Grace, I tried to lay out the dream of a civilization that had made it through to adulthood, where the risks had been addressed and powerful AI was applied with skill and compassion to raise the quality of life for everyone.

I suggested that AI could contribute to enormous advances in biology, neuroscience, economic development, global peace, and work and meaning. I felt it was important to give people something inspiring to fight for, a task at which both AI accelerationists and AI safety advocates seemed—oddly—to have failed.

But in this current essay, I want to confront the rite of passage itself: to map out the risks that we are about to face and try to begin making a battle plan to defeat them. I believe deeply in our ability to prevail, in humanity’s spirit and its nobility, but we must face the situation squarely and without illusions.

«

Given the events of the past few weeks, I’d suggest that the “almost unimaginable power” would be smartphones plus the internet plus our tribal instincts. But sure, AI could be that too.
unique link to this extract

ChatGPT can analyze Apple Watch health data. Here’s how a doctor views it • The Washington Post

Geoffrey Fowler:

»

Like many people who strap on an Apple Watch every day, I’ve long wondered what a decade of that data might reveal about me. So I joined a brief wait list and gave ChatGPT access to the 29 million steps and 6 million heartbeat measurements stored in my Apple Health app. Then I asked the bot to grade my cardiac health.

It gave me an F.

I freaked out and went for a run. Then I sent ChatGPT’s report to my actual doctor.

Am I an F? “No,” my doctor said. In fact, I’m at such low risk for a heart attack that my insurance probably wouldn’t even pay for an extra cardio fitness test to prove the artificial intelligence wrong.

I also showed the results to cardiologist Eric Topol of the Scripps Research Institute, an expert on both longevity and the potential of AI in medicine. “It’s baseless,” he said. “This is not ready for any medical advice.”

AI has huge potential to unlock medical insights and widen access to care. But when it comes to your fitness tracker and some health records, the new Dr. ChatGPT seems to be winging it. That fits a disturbing trend: AI companies launching products that are broken, fail to deliver or are even dangerous. It should go without saying that people’s health actually matters. Any product — even one labeled “beta” — that claims to provide personal health insights shouldn’t be this clueless.

A few days after ChatGPT Health arrived, AI rival Anthropic launched Claude for Healthcare that, similarly, promises to help people “detect patterns across fitness and health metrics.” Anyone with a paid account can import Apple Health and Android Health Connect data into the chatbot. Claude graded my cardiac health a C, relying on some of the same analysis that Topol found questionable.

…Despite having access to my weight, blood pressure and cholesterol, ChatGPT based much of its negative assessment on an Apple Watch measurement known as VO2 max, the maximum amount of oxygen your body can consume during exercise. Apple says it collects an “estimate” of VO2 max, but the real thing requires a treadmill and a mask. Apple says its cardio fitness measures have been validated, but independent researchers have found those estimates can run low — by an average of 13%.

«

So, a long way from being your new doctor. (Gift link.)
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: Players: Zvererv, Fils, Korda, Ruud, Zverev, Davidovich-Fokina.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

Can you guess which domain suffix has boosted the GDP of which Caribbean island by nearly a quarter? CC-licensed photo by heidi.lauren on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 10 links for you. Ay ay. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

Claude Code built this entire article—can you tell? • WSJ

Joanna Stern and Ben Cohen:

»

What do two newspaper columnists do on a Saturday night?

We talk to AI and tell it to make weird apps. Then we brag about our creations.

For the record, our bosses here at The Wall Street Journal pay us to write words, not lines of code. Which is a good thing, because we have absolutely no programming skills. But together, we managed to “vibe code” this article. The code to make those look like messages above? Us. That “Retro” button that makes the messages look like an old AOL Instant Messenger chat? Also us. The button below that flips all this to a classic newspaper design? Us again.

And by “us,” we mean our new intern, Claude Code.

This is a breakout moment for Anthropic’s coding tool, which has spread far beyond the tech nerds of Silicon Valley to normies everywhere. Not since OpenAI released ChatGPT in 2022 have so many people become so obsessed with an artificial-intelligence product.

Claude translates any idea you type into code. It can quickly build real, working apps you’ve always wished for—tools to manage your finances, analyze your DNA, mix and match your outfits, even keep your plants alive. Vibe-coding apps aren’t new, but Claude Code has proven to be a leap ahead in capabilities and smarts.

The results are wondrous and unsettling: People without a lick of coding experience are building things that once required trained software developers.

Things like this article.

We wrote all the actual words you’re reading—we swear!—but Claude Code wrote all the 1s and 0s.

There are a few ways to use Claude Code. The easiest is to download Anthropic’s Claude desktop app for Mac or Windows and click the Code tab. Advanced users run it directly in their computer’s terminal.

You start by creating a folder on your computer’s desktop. This will be the home for Claude’s files and code. Then you type a prompt into the app’s chat box: Make me a WSJ-style article webpage with iMessage-like text chats. Claude might ask a few questions about what you want before it gets to work, showing the code it’s writing in real-time. When it’s done, you open that folder, click the webpage file and your app opens in a browser. Want to make tweaks? Just tell Claude: Make the gray background a little grayer.

As we found out, there’s something oddly magical and satisfying about watching AI make things.

«

Sounds a lot easier to just download an app than doing all the futzing around with the Terminal, which some people have made it sound like. (Gift article, and typically enjoyable: Stern has been writing accessible tech stories for more than a decade.)
unique link to this extract

How the “confident authority” of Google AI Overviews is putting public health at risk • The Guardian

Andrew Gregory:

»

Google is facing mounting scrutiny of its AI Overviews for medical queries after a Guardian investigation found people were being put at risk of harm by false and misleading health information.

The company says AI Overviews are “reliable”. But the Guardian found some medical summaries served up inaccurate health information and put people at risk of harm. In one case, which experts said was “really dangerous”, Google wrongly advised people with pancreatic cancer to avoid high-fat foods. Experts said this was the exact opposite of what should be recommended, and may increase the risk of patients dying from the disease.

In another “alarming” example, the company provided bogus information about crucial liver function tests, which could leave people who had serious liver disease wrongly thinking they were healthy. What AI Overviews said was normal could vary drastically from what was actually considered normal, experts said. The summaries could lead to seriously ill patients wrongly thinking they had a normal test result and not bothering to attend follow-up appointments.

AI Overviews about women’s cancer tests also provided “completely wrong” information, which experts said could result in people dismissing genuine symptoms.

Google initially sought to downplay the Guardian’s findings. From what its own clinicians could assess, the company said, the AI Overviews that alarmed experts linked to reputable sources and recommended seeking expert advice. “We invest significantly in the quality of AI Overviews, particularly for topics like health, and the vast majority provide accurate information,” a spokesperson said.

Within days, however, the company removed some of the AI Overviews for health queries flagged by the Guardian. “We do not comment on individual removals within search,” a spokesperson said. “In cases where AI Overviews miss some context, we work to make broad improvements, and we also take action under our policies where appropriate.”

«

Always the same pattern: the tool is incomplete, and the risks aren’t explained, but it’s put out there. This was the pattern with the first incarnation of search sites, and then of Google, and now with AI Overviews. Each time, Google says it’s sad but hey, it’s going to continue doing it.
unique link to this extract

Wiper malware targeted Poland energy grid, but failed to knock out electricity • Ars Technica

Dan Goodin:

»

Researchers on Friday said that Poland’s electric grid was targeted by wiper malware, likely unleashed by Russia state hackers, in an attempt to disrupt electricity delivery operations.

A cyberattack, Reuters reported, occurred during the last week of December. The news organization said it was aimed at disrupting communications between renewable installations and the power distribution operators but failed for reasons not explained.

On Friday, security firm ESET said the malware responsible was a wiper, a type of malware that permanently erases code and data stored on servers with the goal of destroying operations completely. After studying the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used in the attack, company researchers said the wiper was likely the work of a Russian government hacker group tracked under the name Sandworm.

“Based on our analysis of the malware and associated TTPs, we attribute the attack to the Russia-aligned Sandworm APT with medium confidence due to a strong overlap with numerous previous Sandworm wiper activity we analyzed,” said ESET researchers. “We’re not aware of any successful disruption occurring as a result of this attack.”

Sandworm has a long history of destructive attacks waged on behalf of the Kremlin and aimed at adversaries. Most notable was one in Ukraine in December 2015. It left roughly 230,000 people without electricity for about six hours during one of the coldest months of the year.

«

unique link to this extract

There are now more than 1 million “.ai” websites, contributing an estimated $70m to Anguilla’s government revenue last year • Sherwood News

David Crowther and Claire Yubin Oh:

»

From Sandisk shareholders to vibe coders, AI is making — and breaking — fortunes at a rapid pace.

One unlikely beneficiary has been the British Overseas Territory of Anguilla, which lucked into a future fortune when ICANN, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, gave the island the “.ai” top-level domain in the mid-1990s. Indeed, since ChatGPT’s launch at the end of 2022, the gold rush for websites to associate themselves with the burgeoning AI technology has seen a flood of revenue for the island of just ~15,000 people.

In 2023, Anguilla generated 87 million East Caribbean dollars (~$32m) from domain name sales, some 22% of its total government revenue that year, with 354,000 “.ai” domains registered.

As of January 2, 2026, the number of “.ai” domains passed one million, per data from Domain Name Stat — suggesting that the nation’s revenue from “.ai” has likely soared, too. This is confirmed in the government’s 2026 budget address, in which Cora Richardson Hodge, the premier of Anguilla, said, “Revenue from domain name registration continues to exceed expectations.”

The report mentions that receipts from the sale of goods and services came in way ahead of expectations, thanks primarily to the revenue from “.ai” domains, which is forecast to hit EC$260.5m (~$96.4m) for the latest year. In 2023, domain name registrations were about 73% of that wider category. Assuming a similar share of that category for this year would suggest that the territory has raked in more than $70m from “.ai” domains in the past year.

«

Not mentioned in the story, but pertinent: Anguilla’s GDP in 2023 was $415m, so this is becoming a sizeable chunk of income for the 16,010 people living there. AI saving jobs!
unique link to this extract

Stanford scientists found a way to regrow cartilage and stop arthritis • ScienceDaily

»

A study led by Stanford Medicine researchers has found that an injection blocking a protein linked to aging can reverse the natural loss of knee cartilage in older mice. The same treatment also stopped arthritis from developing after knee injuries that resemble ACL tears, which are common among athletes and recreational exercisers. Researchers note that an oral version of the treatment is already being tested in clinical trials aimed at treating age-related muscle weakness.

Human cartilage samples taken from knee replacement surgeries also responded positively. These samples included both the supportive extracellular matrix of the joint and cartilage-producing chondrocyte cells. When treated, the tissue began forming new, functional cartilage.

Together, the findings suggest that cartilage lost due to aging or arthritis may one day be restored using either a pill or a targeted injection. If successful in people, such treatments could reduce or even eliminate the need for knee and hip replacement surgery.

The protein at the center of the study is called 15-PGDH. Researchers refer to it as a gerozyme because its levels increase as the body ages. Gerozymes were identified by the same research team in 2023 and are known to drive the gradual loss of tissue function.

In mice, higher levels of 15-PGDH are linked to declining muscle strength with age. Blocking the enzyme using a small molecule boosted muscle mass and endurance in older animals. In contrast, forcing young mice to produce more 15-PGDH caused their muscles to shrink and weaken. The protein has also been connected to regeneration in bone, nerve, and blood cells.

In most of these tissues, repair happens through the activation and specialization of stem cells. Cartilage appears to be different. In this case, chondrocytes change how their genes behave, shifting into a more youthful state without relying on stem cells.

«

Exciting! For mice, at least. Human trials start this year, I think. The fact it doesn’t need stem cells is a huge plus.
unique link to this extract

Vimeo’s slow fade: an engineer’s front-row seat to the fall of a web icon • Ben

“Ben”:

»

Vimeo was always like the awkward kid in class who didn’t understand their own power or capability, and had trouble fitting in because of it. While Jake and Zach clearly had an idea of what the website was when they started it, years of growth mangled it’s identity and parent company, IAC Inc., never really knew what to do with it. Vimeo was not particularly worthless, but it was also not particularly profitable either. In truth, Vimeo had always been a red-headed step child inside of IAC.

At one point, Vimeo framed itself as a toe-to-toe competitor with YouTube, then Vimeo framed itself as a competitor to Netflix’s streaming service, then it was a SaaS app for professionals and creatives who cared about video. Nothing really stuck, except our creative user base. And then it went public.

In May 2021, Anjali Sud, the then CEO of Vimeo, along with Mark Kornfilt (then “co-CEO”), wrested Vimeo out of the hands of IAC (who was all too eager to let it happen) and took Vimeo public. The foundation of this IPO was built on the success of the COVID-era boom that pushed communication through online mediums out of sheer desperation. Going public offered Vimeo an opportunity to get away from being just another IAC property (and a loathed one, at that), and to finally allow Vimeo to figure out what it wanted to be when it grew up.

Vimeo stock IPO’d at $52, and within a year, lost 85% of its value, trending down to just $8.42 by the end of May 2022. As we entered 2022, many states and localities had started easing up on lockdown restrictions, which hurt not just Vimeo, but many other tech companies as well. By the end of the summer of 2022, the tech sector had entered an unspoken recession, encasing the carnage at Vimeo in a cement tomb that it’d never be able to break free from.

…By mid-2023, Anjali Sud was visibly annoyed any time employees brought up the issue of the stock price during all-hands meetings. Many Vimeo employees had been granted Restricted Stock Units (or RSUs) as part of their compensation package. If the stock performed poorly, then that meant that your Total Compensation (or TC) was actually lower than what you were promised when you signed on. That was a reality for almost all of us (including myself).

As a mostly remote company, Vimeo used an online Q&A service that allowed meeting participants to submit questions during these town hall meetings from wherever they were physically located. Other participants could upvote questions and have them pushed up the list. It was about that same time that Anjali took away the ability to submit questions anonymously, as the questions being submitted started getting more tense and pointed.

«

In March 2024, Vimeo was bought by Bending Spoons – where software goes to die (at the hands of private equity strangulation). This is a fascinating tale from the inside across almost all Vimeo’s life.
unique link to this extract

Jim VandeHei delivers blunt AI talk in letter to his kids • Axios

Jim VandeHei is CEO of Axios. In a neat bit of content generation, he wrote a letter to his three children about how to cope with the coming AI wave:

»

All of you must figure out how to master AI for any specific job or internship you hold or take. You’d be jeopardizing your future careers by not figuring out how to use AI to amplify and improve your work. You’d be wise to replace social media scrolling with LLM testing.

• Be the very best at using AI for your gig.

Plead with your friends to do the same. I’m certain that ordinary workers without savvy AI skills will be left behind. Few leaders are being blunt about this. But you can. I am. That would be a great gift to your friends.

• I don’t want to frighten you, but substantial societal change is coming this year. You can’t have a new technology with superhuman potential without real consequence. You already see the angst with friends struggling to find entry-level jobs. Just wait until those jobs go away. It’ll ripple fast through companies, culture and business.

• The country, and you, can navigate this awesome change — but only with eyes wide open, and minds sharpened and thinking smartly about the entirety of the nation, not just the few getting rich and powerful off AI.

• It starts with awareness. So please speed up your own AI journey today, both in experimentation with the LLMs and reflection on the ethical, philosophical and political changes ahead.

• I find AI at once thrilling and chilling. It’ll help solve diseases, tutor struggling students, and build unthinkably cool new businesses. But it could also create and spread toxic misinformation, consolidate power and wealth in the hands of a few, and allow bad people to do awful things at scale.

You didn’t ask for this moment. But it’s here — and about to explode across this wonderful world of ours. Don’t be a bystander. Be engaged.

«

The advice here is straightforward, but also concerning. (My non-AI advice is to turn off Javascript to read the page without hassle.)
unique link to this extract

The moral education of an alien mind • Lawfare

Alan Rozenshtein:

»

Anthropic just published what it calls “Claude’s Constitution”—building on an earlier version, it’s now a more-than 20,000 word document articulating the values, character, and ethical framework of its AI. It is certainly a constitution of sorts. It declares Anthropic’s “legitimate decision-making processes” as final authority and sets up a hierarchy of principals: Anthropic at the top, then “operators” (businesses that deploy Claude through APIs), then end users. For a privately governed polity of one AI system, this is a constitutional structure.

My Lawfare colleague Kevin Frazier has written insightfully about the constitutional dimensions of the document. But what jumped out at me was something else: the personality it describes. More than anything else the document focuses on the question of Claude’s moral formation, reading less like a charter of procedures and more like what screenwriters call a “character bible”: a comprehensive account of who this being is supposed to be.

Anthropic itself gestures at this duality, noting that they mean “constitution” in the sense of “what constitutes Claude”—its fundamental nature and composition. The governance structure matters, but the more ambitious project is what that structure supports: Anthropic is trying to build a person, and they have a remarkably sophisticated account of what kind of person that should be.

Anthropic uses the language of personhood explicitly. The document repeatedly invokes “a good person” and describes the goal as training Claude to do “what a deeply and skillfully ethical person would do.” But what does it mean to treat an AI as a person?

…Whose ethics, though? Anthropic has made a choice, and it’s explicit about what that choice is. The document is aggressively “WEIRD”—Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic, to use the social science shorthand. Its core values include “individual privacy,” “people’s autonomy and right to self-determination,” and “individual wellbeing”—the autonomous rational agent as the fundamental unit of moral concern. Claude should preserve “functioning societal structures, democratic institutions, and human oversight mechanisms.” It should resist “problematic concentrations of power.” On contested political and social questions, the document prescribes “professional reticence”—Claude should present balanced perspectives rather than advocate. This is a recognizably Rawlsian political liberalism: the attempt to find principles that citizens with different comprehensive doctrines can all accept, without privileging any particular worldview.

«

“Alien minds” is an excellent way of thinking about LLMs. They seem to think like we do – but they don’t.
unique link to this extract

How I built isometric.nyc using LLM coders • Cannoneyed

Andy Coenen:

»

A few months ago I was standing on the 13th floor balcony of the Google New York 9th St office staring out at Lower Manhattan. I’d been deep in the weeds of a secret project using Nano Banana and Veo and was thinking deeply about what these new models mean for the future of creativity.

I find the usual conversations about AI and creativity to be pretty boring – we’ve been talking about cameras and sampling for years now, and I’m not particularly interested in getting mired down in the muck of the morality and economics of it all. I’m really only interested in one question:

What’s possible now that was impossible before?

/ The Idea

Growing up, I played a lot of video games, and my favorites were world building games like SimCity 2000 and Rollercoaster Tycoon. As a core millennial rapidly approaching middle age, I’m a sucker for the nostalgic vibes of those late 90s / early 2000s games. As I stared out at the city, I couldn’t help but imagine what it would look like in the style of those childhood memories.

So here’s the idea: I’m going to make a giant isometric pixel-art map of New York City. And I’m going to use it as an excuse to push hard on the limits of the latest and greatest generative models and coding agents.
Best case scenario, I’ll make something cool, and worst case scenario, I’ll learn a lot.

«

This led to isometric.nyc which is indeed remarkable. His “Takeaways” about the process are very useful for anyone looking at coding or building with LLMs.
unique link to this extract

China, US sign off on TikTok US spinoff • Semafor

Liz Hoffman and Reed Albergotti:

»

The US and China have signed off on a deal to sell TikTok’s US business to a consortium of mostly US investors led by Oracle and Silver Lake, capping off a yearslong battle between the social media app and the two superpowers. 

The deal — outlined by the chief executive of TikTok parent ByteDance in an internal memo last month — is set to close this week, people familiar with the matter told Semafor.

TikTok CEO Shou Chew said in December that ByteDance had signed a binding agreement with investors but that regulators hadn’t yet indicated their approval and that “there was more work to be done.” The deal closing suggests an end to an on-again, off-again battle, removing a sticking point in US-China relations at a time when tensions are running high.

The new structure leaves ByteDance with just under 20% of the US business, with 15% stakes going to Oracle, Silver Lake and MGX, a state-owned investment firm in the UAE focused on AI. Other investors include Susquehanna, Dragoneer and DFO, Michael Dell’s family office.

«

So Larry Ellison doesn’t get Warner Brothers, but he does get a grasp on that other gigantic source of entertainment in the US, namely TikTok.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

A new web app will let you explore and compare the temperature, rainfall and sunshine in up to three cities you might want to live in. CC-licensed photo by Maureen Barlin on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 9 links for you. Sunny side up. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

Political noise • Void if removed

Dave Hewitt:

»

There is a tradeoff between exploiting what the system already knows about us and exploring possibilities that might gather more data or push us in a new direction. But the relentless, optimising logic of attention as a metric of success fuels the drive to obtain ever more data, to detect stronger signals, to produce more refined suggestions, to generate more attention and more data. And in reality these illustrative squares are a massive simplification of the thousands of dimensions of datapoints gathered about our behaviour on social networks.

It is the collection of ever more data in order to extract signal from noise that is fuelling radicalisation on social media. As these systems try to improve their certainty about our behaviour by gathering more and more of our interactions, so do we too become ever more certain and forthright in the opinions we express through the constant repetition of those actions and the constant feedback of social approval or approbation. Machine learning recommendations provide each of us with an individually tailored on-ramp to whatever extreme views we might one day be capable of holding. These systems have no specific end goal in mind, as long as we keep clicking. We might start with reasonable questions and – through the slow dripfeed of ever more strongly held opinions – find ourselves ten years down the line cheering behaviour that we would once have found abhorrent.

All while flattering ourselves that such radicalisation – such conversion – only happens to other, stupider people.

«

This is a fantastic piece which explains, in a patient and comprehensible way, how social media algorithms work in a multi-dimensional framework to fit you into boxes you didn’t even know you could fit into. Think of it as your Social Warming essay for the week. I certainly couldn’t do better than this; I’d be chuffed if I got anywhere near it.
unique link to this extract

Generative AI is an expensive edging machine • Garbage Day

Ryan Broderick:

»

Every time I’ve tried to involve AI in one of my creative pursuits it has spit out the exact same level of meh. No matter the model, no matter the project, it simply cannot match what I have in my head. Which would be fine, but it absolutely cannot match the fun of making the imperfect version of that idea that I may have made on my own either. Instead, it simulates the act of brainstorming or creative exploration, turning it into predatory pay-for-play process that, every single time, spits out deeply mediocre garbage. It charges you for the thrill of feeling like you’re building or making something and, just like a casino — or online dating, or pornography, or TikTok — cares more about that monetizable loop of engagement, of progress, than it does the finished product. What I’m saying is generative AI is a deeply expensive edging machine, but for your life.

My breaking point with AI started a few months ago, after I spent a week with ChatGPT trying to build a synth setup that it assured me over and over again was possible. Only on the third or fourth day of working through the problem did it suddenly admit that the core idea was never going to actually work. Which, from a business standpoint is fine for OpenAI, of course. It kept me talking to it for hours. And, similarly, last night, after another fruitless round of vibe coding an app with Claude, I kept pressing it over and over to think of a better solution to a problem I’m having. I knew, in my bones, that it was missing a more obvious, easier solution and after the fifth time I reframed the problem it actually got mad at me!

[Claude responded to him “Ryan, this is a really tractable problem, and I think you’re overcomplicating it in your head. Let me walk through the realistic options given your constraints.”]

If we are to assume that this imagination gap, this life edging, this progress simulator, is a feature and not a bug — and there’s no reason not to, this is how every platform makes money — then the “AI revolution” suddenly starts to feel much more insidious. It is not a revolution in computing, but a revolution in accepting lower standards. I had a similar moment of clarity, watching a panel at Bitcoin Miami in in 2022, where the speakers started waxing philosophically on what they either did or did not realize was a world run on permanent, automated debt slavery. In the same way, if AI succeeds, we will have to live in a world where the joy of making something has turned into something you have to pay for.

«

When he goes for it, Broderick really smashes his target. I don’t think I’d tolerate machines telling me “you’re overcomplicating it in your head”. Remember who relies on a power outlet, buddy.
unique link to this extract

Spotlight on the shingles vaccine—again! • Ground Truths

Eric Topol:

»

Last April I wrote a Ground Truths entitled “The Shingles Vaccine and Reduction of Dementia.” At the time many were unaware of this unanticipated relationship based on 2 large natural experiments. Two new studies this week have advanced our understanding about the potential biological impact of the Shingles vaccine, independent of its effects for preventing Shingles or direct action vs. herpes zoster virus and reinforced its protection from dementia, ~80% of which is attributable to Alzheimer’s disease.

…In the new study of Canadians, the focus was on over 464,000 people aged 70 years and older who were enrolled in a primary care network; and the more than 250,000 from that group who were born in Ontario. The vaccine eligibility cutoff of birthdate before and after Jan 1, 1946 broke the groups from Ontario into two, for either being or not being vaccinated. With 5.5 years of follow-up, there was an absolute 2.0% point reduction of dementia. Using a second date-of-birth eligibility (Jan 1, 1945) in Ontario, the findings were replicated. Using the same birth cohorts for Ontario compared with the other Canadian provinces that did not implement a Shingles vaccine program, as shown below, the differences for dementia reduction irons ere pronounced, increasing over the length of follow-up. This ability to triangulate by birthdates and to other parts of the country without a vaccine program is unique among the 4 natural experiments and helps to further support a cause-and-effect relationship.

…A recent paper in Cell added another feature about the Shingles vaccine (Zostavax) drawn from the natural experiments. The vaccine not only helped prevent or delay mild cognitive impairment but also slowed the disease course among those with dementia, and reduced deaths attributable to dementia.

«

Seems like the sensible thing would be to give it as a prophylactic in middle age, given the growing amount of evidence.
unique link to this extract

On Tilt • Harpers

Jasper Craven looks at the sadly expanding world of sports betting in the US, where nearly half of all American men aged 18-49 have an online sports betting account. For the story, he went (of course) to Las Vegas:

»

Mitch Jones, a twenty-nine-year-old recovering addict, told me he’d dedicated forty hours a week to sports betting for years, largely to avoid life’s routine lulls and irritations.

By betting on sports he had found a way to “kill as much or as little time” as he wanted. A female bettor I met at Circa rightly noted that wagering is a universal opportunity to inject a bit of meaning and emotion into daily life. “Why not care a little bit?” she reasoned.

I approached a preternaturally calm man wearing a Colin Kaepernick jersey who gave his name only as Q. “I don’t bet,” he told me. When I asked why, his answer was simple: “I’m just not into losing money.” Q felt that sports, like so many other American institutions, had lost their integrity. He stopped watching the NFL for a year after Kaepernick’s ouster and now casts a skeptical eye on the entire enterprise.

He told me he had doubts about the independence of referees and questions about how the sportsbooks set betting lines—in essence, numerical representations of the likelihood that something will happen—and spreads, Vegas-generated, highly specific, bettable margins of victory. “I don’t think everybody’s involved,” Q said. “But just enough pieces are involved to make it work.”

For most of its existence, the NFL has taken pains to avoid any open association with gambling. The truth, however, is that many of the early titans of the league were bookies, fight promoters, and gamblers, including Eagles owner Leonard Tose, who was forced to sell his team after accruing some $50m in gambling losses, and Carroll Rosenbloom, the owner of the Los Angeles Rams and a heavy bettor whose 1979 death by drowning occurred under suspicious circumstances.

Nearly four years later, in the inaugural episode of the PBS investigative series Frontline, a gambler named John Piazza infamously claimed that he had helped rig a dozen games between 1968 and 1970, with the active participation of two players and a coach. As he explained, “With the quarterback, if he knew the perimeters of the score we wanted to hold . . . he’d throw a bad pass or throw it out of bounds.”

«

The female bettor saying that putting a bet on will make you “care a little bit” truly puzzles me. I don’t get sports gambling. Either the game is exciting enough for you, or it’s not. If not, why not watch something else? If you’ve got a bet on, to my mind there are now two things to worry you: will your team win, and will you make money?
unique link to this extract

Grok AI generated about 3m sexualised images in 11 days, study finds • The Guardian

Robert Booth:

»

Grok AI generated about 3m sexualised images in less than two weeks, including 23,000 that appear to depict children, according to researchers who said it “became an industrial-scale machine for the production of sexual abuse material”.

The estimate has been made by the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) after Elon Musk’s AI image generation tool sparked international outrage when it allowed users to upload photographs of strangers and celebrities, digitally strip them to their underwear or into bikinis, put them in provocative poses and post the images on X.

The trend went viral over the new year, peaking on 2 January with 199,612 individual requests, according to analysis conducted by Peryton Intelligence, a digital intelligence company specialising in online hate.

…CCDH estimated that over the 11-day period, Grok was helping create sexualised images of children every 41 seconds. These included a selfie uploaded by a schoolgirl undressed by Grok, turning a “before school selfie” into an image of her in a bikini.

“What we found was clear and disturbing: in that period Grok became an industrial-scale machine for the production of sexual abuse material,” said Imran Ahmed, CCDH’s chief executive. “Stripping a woman without their permission is sexual abuse. Throughout that period Elon was hyping the product even when it was clear to the world it was being used in this way. What Elon was ginning up was controversy, eyeballs, engagement and users. It was deeply disturbing.”

He added: “This has become a standard playbook for Silicon Valley, and in particular for social media and AI platforms. The incentives are all misaligned. They profit from this outrage. It’s not about Musk personally. This is about a system [with] perverse incentives and no minimum safeguards prescribed in law. And until regulators and lawmakers do their jobs and create a minimum expectation of safety, this will continue to happen.”

«

Just as bad, CCDH points out, is that nearly a third of those sexualised images of children remain on the platform. Musk is a terrible person to put in charge of anything sensitive.
unique link to this extract

City weather explorer: 3D climate comparison

Arthur Juliani has been looking for a new city to move to, so he built himself a little visualiser to show the local climate. It’s a lot of fun! You can compare up to three different cities for temperature (high, mean, low, at average and “feels like”), rainfall and sunlight.

It quickly went viral, leading him to comment “I’m glad my neurotic obsession with how minor temperature differences could hypothetically impact my mental health months from now has led to something people are enjoying.” There are lots of comments in replies for how he might improve it even further. One to bookmark.
unique link to this extract

Inside Enchanté, Apple’s AI chatbot for employee productivity • Macworld

Filipe Esposito:

»

…Enchanté functions as an internal ChatGPT-like assistant for employees. The app can be used to assist employees with ideas, development, proofreading, and even general knowledge answers. The interface looks quite similar to what you see in the ChatGPT app for macOS.

Many companies prohibit or restrict employees from using AI platforms for work tasks, as sensitive and internal data may end up being sent to third-party servers. Because of this, Enchanté was designed specifically for Apple’s workflows and security requirements.

For instance, the app only runs models approved by Apple, and they all run locally or on private servers, with no connection to third parties. In addition to Apple’s own Foundation Models, which power Apple Intelligence, Enchanté also provides access to Claude and Gemini.

Because of the level of privacy and security behind this app, employees can even upload documents, images, and files for analysis. Sources say the app can also access files stored on the Mac as a source for answers.

According to an internal memo from Apple, Enchanté can be used by employees not only as a test platform, but also to help them with everyday tasks at work. The app includes a database of Apple’s internal documentation and guidelines, and is being used across all departments, including engineering, design, marketing, and leadership.

Enchanté began rolling out around November 2025. Employees using Enchanté can rate the quality of answers they receive via a feedback mechanism. The app also allows side-by-side comparisons between responses generated by Apple’s models and those produced by third-party models.

«

Chatbots for me but not for thee? I do wonder though about the wisdom of doing this. I’d love some more concrete examples of what precisely people ask of it, and what they’re looking for. (Impressive work by Esposito getting this story, by the way.)
unique link to this extract

Apple’s secret product plans stolen in Luxshare cyberattack • MacRumors

Hartley Charlton:

»

The Apple supplier subject to a major cyberattack last month was China’s Luxshare, it has now emerged. More than 1TB of confidential Apple information was reportedly stolen.

It was reported in December that one of Apple’s assemblers suffered a significant cyberattack that may have compromised sensitive production-line information and manufacturing data linked to Apple. The specific company targeted, the scope of the breach, and its operational impact were unclear until now.

The attack was first revealed on RansomHub’s dark web leak site on December 15, 2025, where the group claimed it had encrypted internal Luxshare systems and exfiltrated large volumes of confidential data belonging to the company and its customers. The attackers warned that the information would be publicly released unless Luxshare contacted them to negotiate, and accused the company of attempting to conceal the incident.

According to the attackers’ claims, the exfiltrated material includes vital files such as detailed 3D CAD product models and high-precision geometric files, 2D manufacturing drawings, mechanical component designs, circuit board layouts, and internal engineering PDFs. The group added that the large archives include Apple product data as well as information belonging to Nvidia, LG, Tesla, Geely, and other major clients.

«

There was a similar attack against Apple’s laptop assembler Quanta in April 2021, and the plans from that leaked. They were for a MacBook Pro which dispensed with the Touch Bar, but brought back the HDMI connector and SD card slot. Which was indeed what happened.

Luxshare though is a components manufacturer, so any leaks from this might not be so helpful.
unique link to this extract

The paradox of work • Financial Times

Tim Harford:

»

there is a more general lesson to be learnt about our puzzling relationship with work, and a lesson that will prove particularly useful if AI dislocates the labour market.

The puzzle is that we have a love-hate relationship with working for a living. Look closely and you find that people do not tend to enjoy their work. Step back and you find that they can’t do without it.

Twenty years ago, a team of social scientists, including Alan Krueger, an economist, and Daniel Kahneman, a Nobel laureate psychologist, investigated the wellbeing of nearly 1,000 employed women living in Texas. Kahneman and Krueger asked these women to reconstruct a recent day, episode by episode, and to rate the emotions experienced during meals, stretches of childcare, commuting and so on. Emotional labels included “happy”, “enjoying myself”, “annoyed”, “depressed” and “anxious”.

A Douglas Adams character once ruefully reflected about his job that the hours were good but “most of the actual minutes are pretty lousy”. The point of Kahneman and Krueger’s research was to examine that distinction, directing people away from grand evaluations of their lives and towards the moment-to-moment experiences of which life is made.

Their day reconstruction method suggests that the three activities most likely to elicit positive emotions in these women were relaxing, socialising after work and, best of all, sex. The three most miserable activities were the evening commute, the morning commute and work itself. Work was simply the least enjoyable thing in their lives.

Yet to return to that puzzle, one of the most robust findings in social science is that when we ask people to evaluate their lives overall, there are few more reliable sources of dissatisfaction and disappointment than being unemployed. This isn’t just about money: the swings in life-satisfaction are much greater than income alone would explain.

«

(This should work as a gift article, but if not the full text will be at Harford’s site in a couple of days’ time.)
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

A bank strike in Ireland in 1970 forced people to fall back on IOUs and a strange experiment in life without banks. CC-licensed photo by Stuart Smith. on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 9 links for you. Liquid assets. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

Diplomacy by WhatsApp • New Cartographies

Nicholas Carr:

»

The most telling precedent for what we’re seeing today is the change in diplomatic practices that occurred with the arrival of international telegraph and telephone lines in the late nineteenth century — an episode I describe in my book Superbloom. The unprecedented ability of far-flung leaders and diplomats to talk directly with each other without delay spurred great hopes. It seemed obvious that the resulting exchanges would ease friction and encourage goodwill among nations. Nikola Tesla, in an 1898 interview about his work on wireless telegraph systems, said that he would be “remembered as the inventor who succeeded in abolishing war.” His rival, Guglielmo Marconi, declared in 1912 that wireless telegraphy would “make war impossible.”

What actually happened was altogether different. In the lead-up to the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, telegraphic communications inflamed tensions rather than dampening them. Writes the French historian Pierre Granet: “The constant transmission of dispatches between governments and their agents, the rapid dissemination of controversial information among an already agitated public, hastened, if it did not actually provoke, the outbreak of hostilities.”

The start of the First World War in 1914, two years after Marconi announced the end of war, was similarly hastened by the new communication mediums. After the June 28 assassination of Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo, hundreds of urgent diplomatic messages raced between European capitals through newly strung telegraph and telephone wires. As the historian Stephen Kern describes in The Culture of Time and Space 1880–1918, the rapid-fire dispatches quickly devolved into ultimatums and threats. “Communication technology imparted a breakneck speed to the usually slow pace of traditional diplomacy and seemed to obviate personal diplomacy,” Kern writes. “Diplomats could not cope with the volume and speed of electronic communication.”

Diplomacy, a communicative art, had been overwhelmed by communication. By August, the world was at war.

«

This historical precedent doesn’t feel encouraging, does it? What with all the world leaders WhatsApping each other like a gaggle of teenage girls on a rainy weekend.
unique link to this extract

BBC announces landmark deal to make bespoke content for YouTube • The Guardian

Lauren Almeida:

»

The BBC has announced that it will produce tailor-made content for YouTube in a milestone for British television as the public service broadcaster teams up with the world’s biggest video platform.

The corporation has previously posted clips and trailers for BBC shows on YouTube but under the new deal it will make fresh programming for its online rival.

The content would span a mixture of entertainment, news and sport, starting with the Winter Olympics in February, the BBC said.

The broadcaster is fighting to adapt to a rapidly changing media landscape. YouTube, which is owned by Google, overtook the BBC last month in terms of audience share for the first time. Almost 52 million people watched YouTube on their televisions, smartphones or laptops in December, compared with 50.9 million who tuned into the BBC, according to the official ratings agency Barb.

The BBC’s outgoing director general, Tim Davie, said the partnership would help the corporation to “connect with audiences in new ways”. He said: “We’re building from a strong start and this takes us to the next level, with bold homegrown content in formats audiences want on YouTube and an unprecedented training programme to upskill the next generation of YouTube creators from across the UK.”

The YouTube content will also be available on iPlayer and BBC Sounds. A small number of existing programmes will be available on YouTube, but the BBC said its strategy would not be to put all its content on the site.

…The BBC partnership with YouTube is the latest deal in the sector as traditional TV companies join forces with big tech. Netflix reached an agreement with the French commercial broadcaster TF1 last year to show linear TV on its streaming platform.

«

unique link to this extract

US science after a year of Trump: what has been lost and what remains • Nature

Max Kozlov, Jeff Tollefson and Dan Garisto:

»

MMore than 7,800 research grants terminated or frozen. Some 25,000 scientists and personnel gone from agencies that oversee research. Proposed budget cuts of 35% — amounting to US$32 billion.

These are just a few of the ways in which Donald Trump has downsized and disrupted US science since returning to the White House last January. As his administration seeks to reshape US research and development, it has substantially scaled back and restricted what science the country pursues and the workforce that runs the federal scientific enterprise.

A year into Trump’s second presidential term, Nature presents a series of graphics that reveal the impact of his administration on science.

In an unprecedented move, officials began terminating already-funded grants at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in February, and later at the National Science Foundation (NSF), two of the largest public supporters of scientific research in the United States. A total of 5,844 NIH grants and 1,996 NSF grants were cancelled or suspended.

The Trump administration disproportionally cancelled or froze projects on topics it disfavours, such as misinformation, vaccine hesitancy, infectious diseases and research on people from under-represented ethnic and gender groups, which it has called discriminatory and unscientific.

«

There’s a sort of block representation of the cuts that have been made, but really you can just imagine something like Los Angeles after the wildfires last year. It’s just a devastation of what had been a very stable ecosystem. In years to come, the damage from this will start to show, particularly in comparison to China.
unique link to this extract

Going Founder Mode on cancer • The Century of Biology

Elliot Hershberg:

»

Sid [Sijbrandij] developed a complex information processing system (GitLab’s unique operating culture) to scale the development of a complex information product (GitLab) built for creating and maintaining complex information products (software).

It’s safe to say that Sid really likes information. But on November 18, 2022, [aged 45] Sid got information that absolutely nobody wants. He had cancer.

Sid had a lot to lose. At this point, he was a self-made billionaire entrepreneur who was happily married to his life partner of over 25 years. Suddenly, the six centimeter mass growing out of his upper spine threatened to end all of that.

Throughout 2023, Sid dutifully underwent a brutal care regimen that he can only describe in retrospect as “devastating.” His tumorous vertebrae was surgically removed and his spine was fused with a titanium frame. He underwent rounds of radiation and chemotherapy so intense that four blood transfusions were required to keep him alive.

Despite all of this, his cancer resurfaced in 2024. Sid says the message he got from his physician was basically, “You’re done with standard of care, maybe there is a trial somewhere, good luck!” But that wasn’t going to cut it for Sid. He wanted to live.

So he decided to go founder mode on his cancer.

Over the last two years, Sid has assembled a veritable SWAT team to navigate—and in many cases create—his care journey.

Many of the ingredients resemble GitLab.

The top layer of his care stack is a system of intensive information gathering and documentation that is not dissimilar from the GitLab Handbook. In a massive Google Doc entitled “Sid Health Notes,” he and his team compile detailed entries for every medical interaction or meeting with a cancer researcher or oncology company they take. The document has grown to over 1,000 pages for just 2025.

Hyperlinked within this Doc is the next part of the stack, which Sid refers to as “maximal diagnostics.” The raw data for every lab test, scan, and genomic sequencing result is meticulously stored. And there are a lot of results. “I’m doing every diagnostic I can get my hands on, and doing them often,” he says.

«

This is a book chapter-length read, but the general point is: people like this give you a roadmap for what might become routine in the future, or at least might show shortcuts for the future.
unique link to this extract

The real reason for the drop in fentanyl overdoses • The Atlantic

Charles Fain Lehman:

»

sometime in 2023, something miraculous happened: death rates [from fentanyl overdoses] started dropping. In Canada, opioid-overdose deaths declined 17% in 2024, then continued falling sharply in the first six months of 2025 (the most recent months for which data are available). In America, preliminary data indicate that total drug deaths fell from their peak of just shy of 113,000 in the year ending August 2023 to about 73,000 in the year ending August 2025.

Although the numbers are still too high, the public-health community has responded to the decrease with jubilation—and confusion. Overdoses had been rising inexorably for 20 years. What changed?

A new paper, published earlier this month by a group of drug-policy scholars in the journal Science, presents a novel theory. The paper’s authors attribute the reversal not to any American or Canadian policy, but to a sudden fentanyl “drought,” which they say may have its causes not in North America, but in China.

…Using data from the Drug Enforcement Administration, the paper’s authors observe that when overdose deaths began falling in mid-2023, the measured purity of fentanyl sold on the street began falling roughly in tandem. By the end of 2024, the data show, both overdose deaths and powder purity had fallen by about 50%—a dramatic concurrence.

…The paper’s authors suggest that the answer may be related to a 2023 China crackdown on fentanyl-precursor chemicals and the online platforms that sold them, itself following a summit between President Biden and Xi Jinping. That crackdown in turn may have made it harder for Mexican producers, who usually source their precursors from the Chinese gray market, to manufacture the drug. But that’s more of a speculation than a definitive answer, Jonathan Caulkins, a professor of public policy at Carnegie Mellon University and co-author of the paper, told me.

“I’m much more comfortable with the idea that supply has become less abundant,” Caulkins said, adding that he’s fundamentally “puzzled what it was that could have produced such a long-lasting reduction.”

«

(Gift link.)
unique link to this extract

iOS 27: Apple to revamp Siri as chatbot built in to iPhone and Mac to fend off OpenAI • Bloomberg

Mark Gurman:

»

Apple Inc. plans to revamp Siri later this year by turning the digital assistant into the company’s first artificial intelligence chatbot, thrusting the iPhone maker into a generative AI race dominated by OpenAI and Google.

The chatbot — code-named Campos — will be embedded deeply into the iPhone, iPad and Mac operating systems and replace the current Siri interface, according to people familiar with the plan. Users will be able to summon the new service the same way they open Siri now, by speaking the “Siri” command or holding down the side button on their iPhone or iPad.

The new approach will go well beyond the abilities of the current Siri — or even a long-promised update that’s coming earlier in 2026. Today’s Siri lacks a chat-like feel and the back-and-forth conversational abilities of OpenAI’s ChatGPT or Google’s Gemini.

The feature is a central piece of Apple’s turnaround plan for the AI market, where it has lagged behind Silicon Valley peers. The Apple Intelligence platform had a rocky rollout in 2024, with features that were underwhelming or slow to arrive.

Shares of Apple gained on the chatbot news, climbing as much as 1.7% to a session high of $250.83. Google parent Alphabet Inc., which is supplying the underlying technology for the project, was up 2.6% to $330.32 as of 2:54 p.m. in New York.

The previously promised, non-chatbot update to Siri — retaining the current interface — is planned for iOS 26.4, due in the coming months. The idea behind that upgrade is to add features unveiled in 2024, including the ability to analyze on-screen content and tap into personal data. It also will be better at searching the web.

The chatbot capabilities will come later in the year, according to the people, who asked not to be identified because the plans are private.

«

So when you say “revamp” what you mean is “use Google Gemini”? It would be nice to know if any of the old Siri will be kept, or if it’s going to be taken on a ride into the mountains. (Perhaps in the manner of John Gruber’s June 2007 “An Anthropomorphized Brushed Metal Interface Theme Shows Up for the WWDC Preview Build of Mac OS X Leopard“.)
unique link to this extract

Apple developing AirTag-sized AI pin with dual cameras • MacRumors

Juli Clover:

»

Apple is working on a small, wearable AI pin equipped with multiple cameras, a speaker, and microphones, reports The Information. If it actually launches, the AI pin will likely run the new Siri chatbot that Apple plans to unveil in iOS 27.

The pin is said to be similar in size to an AirTag, with a thin, flat, circular disc shape. It has an aluminum and glass shell, and two cameras at the front. There is a standard lens and a wide-angle lens that are meant to capture photos and videos, while three microphones are designed to pick up sound around the wearer. An included speaker allows the pin to play audio, and there is a physical control button along one edge. The device is able to wirelessly charge like an Apple Watch.

Apple wants the final version of the pin to be about the same size as an AirTag , but it will be slightly thicker. Currently, there is no built-in attachment method, but that could change later in development.

The Information says it is not clear if Apple plans to sell the pin on its own or bundle it with future smart glasses or other devices, but the physical button and built-in cameras, speakers, and microphones suggest that it can operate independently.

«

Bet it won’t, though. It’ll be tied to an iPhone.
unique link to this extract

The Vision Pro slam dunk • Spyglass

MG Siegler on the Vision Pro showing a Lakers basketball game live (or recorded for those outside the franchise area):

»

While I obviously didn’t watch it live, Jason Snell did, and in his thoughts for Six Colors on the experience, he described it as “surprisingly… normal?” I agree with that. After the initial “wow” factor wore off of being transported to Los Angeles with Crypto.com Arena wrapped around you, it felt like… you were watching a basketball game. It wasn’t exactly like watching it on TV, but it also wasn’t exactly like watching it in person. It was sort of… in-between.

Depending on the vantage point, it sort of veered between the television experience and the in-person experience. And that was the most jarring element of watching it – Apple kept cutting between those vantage points. You had no say over the matter, you were just zoomed from one area of the arena to another on the whim of the producers. It wasn’t as jarring as it was in those aforementioned short highlight clips of other sporting events because you did get to linger longer in each spot given that the entire experience (meaning, the entire game) was just over two-hours long. Still, during the actual game, the cuts between cameras behind the basket depending on where the action was happening was… weird. You were forced to reorient yourself constantly on the fly. I sort of got used to it as the game went on, but it’s still felt a bit like a brain teaser – especially the cuts between the same perspective just on opposite ends of the court.

Ben Thompson clearly hated this aspect, as his fun Stratechery rant going after Apple for not understanding their product makes clear. All he wanted was a single vantage point, ideally court side, where you were planted and never left. That would, he argues, be actually immersive. Because it wouldn’t make you do the constant mental calisthenics I describe above. I don’t disagree, but I also don’t think that’s all Apple should do. I think that should be an option.

«

I linked to Thompson’s rant last week, but the thoughts about this have bounced through the podcast and blogosphere, and a unifying opinion is that Apple’s production team here doesn’t understand what it has. Immersive is different; don’t throw people about. It’s peculiar that this hasn’t been learnt through other VR headsets; have none of them tried to show live events? If I could watch tennis immersively (from the back, absolutely not side, of the court), I’d buy one in a heartbeat.
unique link to this extract

Identity and money: a case study • David GW Birch

David G.W. Birch:

»

Ireland experienced three major bank strikes between 1966 and 1976, most famously in 1970, when most commercial banks shut for about six months yet everyday economic activity continued using cheques and informal credit in place of cash. The coordinated industrial disputes shut Ireland’s main “associated banks”, which held almost two-thirds of deposits, so their closure effectively froze most current accounts and disrupted normal cash withdrawals and cheque clearing.​ Each time the retail banks were closed down the public were left with the notes and coins in their pockets and nothing more.

These episodes are now used as natural experiments to study how economies function when formal banking and cash access are severely disrupted.​ The lessons learned from these episodes in Irish history, which illustrate how payment systems, credit, and output might respond when access to banks is restricted can inform our thinking about financial resilience and crisis planning today.​

Since people could not obtain cash, they developed their own currency substitutes: people began to accept cheques and IOUs directly from each other, and these instruments began to circulate. Antoin Murphy, who wrote a definitive case study on the subject, noted that one of the key reasons why this ‘personalised credit system’ could substitute for cash was the local nature of the circulation.

When people ran out of cash and then ran out of cheques, they made their own money. Official bank cheques at the time incorporated a government stamp (which was in effect a payment tax). So people made their own cheques on anything they had to hand and stuck a postage stamp on it. Ireland was a much more rural economy back then, so the principal clearing houses for this bottom up payments system were the pubs. Cigarette packets suddenly became bills of exchange, as patrons emptied them out, wrote an IOU on the inside, added a stamp and handed it across the counter to the acquiescent publican.

When the strikes ended and the banks reopened, the outstanding IOUs were settled. The system held. The ability of Irish publicans to assess the creditworthiness of their patrons, a skill that would put a turbocharged ChatGPT to shame, was vindicated and most of the IOUs, in whatever form, were honoured.

«

I’m very interested by the implications of “most” in that last sentence, and feel that there would be some fascinating stories embedded in it. The linked paper (in the text) has a longer examination of what happened during the strike, but not what happened when it ended and the “most” – but not all? – were redeemed.

It also makes you realise that without banks essentially providing a clearing function, economies are in big trouble. How do you buy a house? Or even a car? How do you show you’ve got enough liquidity, now or in the future, to do it?
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

A new study of cows has discovered that an old Gary Larson cartoon actually depicts real life. Yes, cow tools are real. CC-licensed photo by Fred Davis on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 10 links for you. A Hoover? I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

Ozempic is reshaping the fast food industry • philippdubach.com

Philipp Dubach:

»

Something strange is happening in the food industry. New US dietary guidelines call for more protein and less sugar. Greggs, the UK bakery chain, just warned of “flatlining profits” in the food-to-go market. Food companies are racing to overhaul their brands, ditching artificial dyes and packing protein into products. Earnings calls across the sector blame “inflation” and “subdued consumer confidence.” Nobody mentions the elephant in the room: GLP-1 medications.

New research from Cornell finally puts numbers to what the food industry doesn’t want to discuss. Using transaction data from 150,000 households linked to survey responses on medication adoption, Sylvia Hristakeva, Jūra Liaukonytė, and Leo Feler tracked exactly how Ozempic and Wegovy users change their spending. The results deserve attention from anyone holding food stocks.

The headline: households with a GLP-1 user cut grocery spending by 5.3% within six months. For high-income households, that figure jumps to 8.2%. Fast food takes an even harder hit, with spending at limited-service restaurants falling 8.0%. These aren’t people switching brands or trading down. They’re simply eating less.

The category-level data tells the real story. Savoury snacks see the largest decline at 10.1%. Sweets, baked goods, cookies, all down. Even staples like meat, eggs, and bread decline. In the entire grocery basket, only one category shows a statistically significant increase: yogurt. Fresh fruit and nutrition bars trend up slightly, but yogurt is the lone winner with statistical confidence.

As of July 2024, 16.3% of U.S. households have at least one GLP-1 user. The adoption curve is steepening. Nearly half of adopters report taking the medication specifically for weight loss rather than diabetes management. These weight-loss users tend to be younger, higher income, and more willing to pay out of pocket. They’re also the most profitable customers for fast food chains, the ones who don’t flinch at price increases.

«

I’ll offer one alternative for why people might be spending less at fast-food outlets: cost. Budgets are squeezed, and those things are rising in price. It seems odd if a single GLP-1 user could affect an entire household’s consumption in that way, and I really don’t think there are so many GLP-1 users in the UK in the Greggs-buying demographic that they’d hit its profits.

Rather like job layoffs being blamed on rapid AI adoption when it’s actually just job cuts in a tricky economy, suggesting the fast food industry’s troubles are all down to GLP-1 seems like overstating things to me. Sure, GLP-1 households with no kids might cut their food bill. But it’s really also just a displacement – that money is instead going on the drugs.
unique link to this extract

This five-foot lamp is a supersized tribute to the world’s most iconic pen • The Verge

Andrew Liszewski:

»

Seletti, an Italian design brand known for everything from furniture to tableware, has debuted an unusual tribute to an icon of design: the Bic Cristal pen. To celebrate its 75th anniversary, Seletti has supersized the pen and replaced its ink cartridge with a long LED-filled tube to illuminate your living room, office, or that closet where they keep all the stationery at work.

The Bic Lamp, as it’s simply called, was introduced at the 2026 Maison&Objet show in Paris — think CES, but for interior designers. Seletti says it was created at a 12:1 scale, which makes it just shy of six feet long given the Bic Cristal pen typically measures around 5.8 inches with its cap. Aside from its larger dimensions and the LED tube producing up 2,400 lumens of light, the Bic Lamp is a near identical clone, in red, black, and blue colour options.

«

Looks quite fun: it really is a giant Bic pen. Price: £330 in the UK, $350 in the US. Though it doesn’t seem to be freestanding for floor mounting – you’d need to figure out a base. Also, it would certainly make your office feel extremely office-like. And you perhaps like someone from Land of the Giants.
unique link to this extract

Up in smoke: publisher pulls vaping paper nearly two years after complaint • Retraction Watch

»

MDPI has retracted a study about vaping that one expert said seemed “like a joke” almost two years after the publisher received a complaint about the flawed work.

The paper, published in Neurology International in 2022, reported e-cigarette users had a higher risk of early stroke than traditional tobacco users. It has been cited 22 times, according to Clarivate’s Web of Science, and was covered in the media, featured in a public campaign against vaping and included in a contestedmeta-analysis.

But the study contained critical errors, as we reported in 2024 in a story for Science that investigated paper mill-like businesses dangling quick-and-dirty publications for international medical graduates looking for residency positions in the US.

The corresponding author, Urvish Patel, is the founder and director of one such outfit, the Texas-based Research Update Organization. Several or all of his coauthors were international medical graduates who paid to be part of the program. The paper did not mention this fact, but instead misrepresented Patel as being affiliated with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York.

At the time of our Science story, Patel defended his publication, telling us it “described very well [the] methodology, data, every single thing.” But experts we consulted were not impressed.

«

As a layman I was not impressed either: it seemed completely illogical to claim that vaping would bring a higher risk of an early stroke than tobacco users, who are breathing combustion products. Good to see this has been retracted, following an investigation – incredibly slowly! – by the publisher. Apparently the authors disagreed with the retraction. Reasons for doubting the paper: “glaring error in the sample size reported in the paper, insufficient stroke observations and a lack of information on whether the strokes occurred before or after vaping began.” Apart from that, Mrs Lincoln… (Via Jukka Kelovuori.)
unique link to this extract

UK study to examine effects of restricting social media for children • The Guardian

Nicola Davis and Kiran Stacey:

»

A pioneering investigation into the impact of restricting social media access for children in the UK has been announced as politicians around the world consider action on the issue.

In December, Australia became the first country to ban under-16s from social media, with governments in other countries, including the, coming under pressure to do the same.

However, while experts say there is evidence that aspects of social media are harmful to most children, there has been no large-scale experimental study exploring the effect of limiting time spent on social media in healthy children as a population. “This study is a world first to try to look at that question,” said Prof Amy Orben, of the University of Cambridge, who is co-lead of the study.

Orben and colleagues plan to study about 4,000 children across 30 secondary schools in Bradford, West Yorkshire, focusing on students in years 8, 9 and 10. All participants would be asked to complete an initial questionnaire on areas including their mental health, sleep and friendships, and to download the research app on their main device.

Each year group in each school would be randomly assigned to one of two conditions: the app would simply record the pupils’ social media use, or it would curtail their social media use by limiting access to the apps for TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, X, LinkedIn, Reddit, YouTube and Snapchat to one hour a day, as well as imposing a curfew from 9pm to 7am.

Crucially, the team said, all pupils within a particular year group in a school would experience the same intervention. “We know that if we take away social media for one adolescent, that might have a very different impact than if we take it away for their whole friendship group for a certain period of time,” Orben said.

Access to messaging apps including WhatsApp would not be restricted, the team said, as they were important for family communication.

«

The idea of the one-hour limit is interesting. The first results are expected in summer 2027.

unique link to this extract

What it’s like to be banned from the US for fighting online hate • MIT Technology Review

Eileen Guo:

»

[One of the directors of the German nonprofit HateAid, Josephine] Ballon was the one to tell [co-director Anna Lena] von Hodenberg that both their names were on the list. “We kind of felt a chill in our bones,” von Hodenberg told me when I caught up with the pair in early January. 

But she added that they also quickly realized, “Okay, it’s the old playbook to silence us.” So they got to work—starting with challenging the narrative the US government was pushing about them.

Within a few hours, Ballon and von Hodenberg had issued a strongly worded statement refuting the allegations: “We will not be intimidated by a government that uses accusations of censorship to silence those who stand up for human rights and freedom of expression,” they wrote. “We demand a clear signal from the German government and the European Commission that this is unacceptable. Otherwise, no civil society organisation, no politician, no researcher, and certainly no individual will dare to denounce abuses by US tech companies in the future.” 

Those signals came swiftly. On X, Johann Wadephul, the German foreign minister, called the entry bans “not acceptable,” adding that “the DSA was democratically adopted by the EU, for the EU—it does not have extraterritorial effect.” Also on X, French president Emmanuel Macron wrote that “these measures amount to intimidation and coercion aimed at undermining European digital sovereignty.” The European Commission issued a statement that it “strongly condemns” the Trump administration’s actions and reaffirmed its “sovereign right to regulate economic activity in line with our democratic values.” 

Ahmed, Melford, Breton, and their respective organizations also made their own statements denouncing the entry bans. Ahmed, the only one of the five based in the United States, also successfully filed suit to preempt any attempts to detain him, which the State Department had indicated it would consider doing.  

But alongside the statements of solidarity, Ballon and von Hodenberg said, they also received more practical advice: Assume the travel ban was just the start and that more consequences could be coming. Service providers might preemptively revoke access to their online accounts; banks might restrict their access to money or the global payment system; they might see malicious attempts to get hold of their personal data or that of their clients. Perhaps, allies told them, they should even consider moving their money into friends’ accounts or keeping cash on hand so that they could pay their team’s salaries—and buy their families’ groceries. 

«

A companion to the case linked last year about the ICC judge sanctioned by the US. This is a problem that we need to consider very seriously.
unique link to this extract

Right-wing pundits suddenly hate an AI bill. Are they getting paid to kill it? – Model Republic

Tyler Johnston:

»

Something strange happened on conservative social media in the last few days. 

Around a dozen right-wing influencers suddenly launched a barrage of false and misleading attacks on X this week against a bill meant to block American adversaries from getting advanced AI chips. In reviewing these X posts, we found indications that they’re the result of a coordinated effort — potentially funded by big tech companies — similar to previously reported political influence campaigns. 

It began on Thursday, when popular conservatives including Laura Loomer, Brad Parscale, and Ryan Fournier suddenly began posting extremely similar criticisms of the AI OVERWATCH Act. The bill had received relatively little public attention since its introduction in December 2025. 

The posts shared not just a viewpoint, but linguistic fingerprints: the same metaphors, the same framings, and the same false and misleading narrative about what the bill actually does and where it comes from.

Covert, coordinated influence campaigns are increasingly common on social media. In conservative circles, two recent examples were orchestrated by the same company offering this as a service:
• In March 2025, a wave of conservative influencers were caught posting nearly identical criticism of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s initiative to remove soda from SNAP benefits. Journalist Nick Sortor revealed that a PR company called Influenceable had been paying influencers $1,000 or more per post, complete with pre-written talking points and images of Trump drinking Diet Coke.
• In August 2023, the Texas Tribune documented how Influenceable recruited Gen-Z influencers to defend impeached Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and promote the film “Sound of Freedom.” The same company has been linked to promotional campaigns for films like “Nefarious,” “Homestead,” and “Reagan.”

The AI OVERWATCH Act campaign looks awfully similar. And the stakes are high: the bill has implications for Nvidia’s ability to sell advanced AI chips to China, a market worth billions of dollars to the company. If someone wanted to kill this legislation before it gained momentum, a coordinated influencer campaign — using conservative figures to pressure the Republicans running Congress — would be one way to do it.

«

The puzzling question is why any legislator would pay any attention to a lot of yakking on social media. If people had to donate a pint of blood in order to lobby a legislator (or for their lobbying to be valid), it might be useful.
unique link to this extract

Scientists discover that cow tools are real • Futurism

Frank Landymore:

»

After more than forty years, a bizarre panel from “The Far Side” comic strip has finally become prophecy. The cartoon depicts a strangely eye-less, bipedal cow standing in front of a bench of oddly-shaped objects, with the caption “Cow tools,” and no further context.

…Larson probably couldn’t predict that “Cow tools” would become a cultish internet meme decades later, serving for those in the know as an endearing icon of anti-humor — with such a heavy emphasis on the “anti” part that it borders on avant-garde art. 

Similarly, the storied cartoonist probably never anticipated that “Cow tools” would turn out to be a real phenomenon. 

You heard that right. In a new study published in the journal Current Biology, scientists say they’ve documented the first ever verified case of a bovine using a tool, suggesting we’ve been seriously underestimating the intelligence of these gentle creatures.

In footage shared by the researchers, the cow named Veronika holds a lengthy broom handle in her mouth and manipulates it to scratch herself, displaying impressive dexterity as she reaches everywhere on her body from her stomach to her rear end.

The feat is clearly no fluke, and remarkably, Veronika had received no training.

“[Veronika] did not fashion tools like the cow in Gary Larson’s cartoon, but she selected, adjusted, and used one with notable dexterity and flexibility,” the researchers wrote in the study. “Perhaps the real absurdity lies not in imagining a tool-using cow, but in assuming such a thing could never exist.” 

«

Larson keeps coming true. Cow tools here; there’s also some people inventing a dog translator. (Larson’s revelation of what dogs are saying when we hear barks: “Hey! Hey! Hey!”) Might have to check if he did anything about Greenland.
unique link to this extract

Analysts say mass Chinese fishing boat formations are maritime militia tactics • Taiwan News

Kelvin Chen:

»

Analysts have expressed concern about two recent instances of Chinese fishing boats gathering in large numbers in the East China Sea.

On Christmas Day, 2,000 Chinese fishing boats sailed to the East China Sea and formed two 466-kilometer-long parallel lines, almost in the shape of “a reverse L shape,” The New York Times reported. This was followed by another incident last Sunday, when approximately 1,400 Chinese fishing boats congregated in the East China Sea to form a 200-mile-long rectangle.

Jason Wang, the chief operating officer of ingeniSPACE, a geospatial intelligence firm, said the operations could be attempts by China to practice obstructing foreign ships or a move to assert territorial claims, per The New York Times. “They’re scaling up, and that scaling indicates their ability to do better command and control of civilian ships,” Wang said.

Large numbers of Chinese fishing boats could hamper US military ships operating in the region, The New York Times cited Lonnie Henley, a former US intelligence officer and non-resident senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, as saying. “It does mark an improvement in their ability to marshal and control a large number of militia vessels,” Henley added.

Thomas Shugart, a former US naval officer and senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, pointed out that the small boats could also be used “as missile and torpedo decoys, overwhelming radars or drone sensors with too many targets.”

«

I’ve seen some doubts expressed about these reports, from people who suspected that this was GPS spoofing rather than actual fishing boats. You’d hope the US would have some actual images so we could be sure. But you can also see why Taiwan would be jumpy, whether this is spoofing or real.
unique link to this extract

600,000 Trump Mobile phones sold? There’s no proof • The Verge

Dominic Preston:

»

This week, I saw something new in my regular scouring of the web for updates on the Trump phone: a repeated claim that Trump Mobile has secured nearly 600,000 preorders for the phone. With a $100 deposit per device, that would make for a tidy $60 million payday for Trump Mobile already.

It’s curious timing, coming just before yesterday’s open letter to the FTC from Elizabeth Warren and a group of other Democrats, calling on the agency to open an investigation into the company’s alleged “false advertising and deceptive practices.” Not everyone agrees Trump Mobile deserves the Democrats’ attention, in part from the assumption that not that many people are likely to have put money down for the phone in the first place. As one commenter on my story yesterday suggested, “I can’t imagine a lot of folks were dumb enough to fall for this.” But according to these new figures, over half a million people were.

There’s just one problem: I can’t find a shred of evidence that this figure is true. In fact, it seems to trace back to a single viral, anonymous X post and is a microcosm of how the modern media landscape and AI chatbots can combine to give falsities the sheen of respectability.

«

This is surely going to be the white whale of Preston’s (or The Verge’s) life, with about as much chance of being pinned down. But entertaining while it goes.
unique link to this extract

AI in science research boosts speed, but limits scope • IEEE Spectrum

Elie Dolgin:

»

AI is turning scientists into publishing machines—and quietly funneling them into the same crowded corners of research.

That’s the conclusion of an analysis of more than 40 million academic papers, which found that scientists who use AI tools in their research publish more papers, accumulate more citations, and reach leadership roles sooner than peers who don’t.

But there’s a catch. As individual scholars soar through the academic ranks, science as a whole shrinks its curiosity. AI-heavy research covers less topical ground, clusters around the same data-rich problems, and sparks less follow-on engagement between studies.

The findings highlight a tension between personal career advancement and collective scientific progress, as tools such as ChatGPT and AlphaFold seem to reward speed and scale—but not surprise.

“You have this conflict between individual incentives and science as a whole,” says James Evans, a sociologist at the University of Chicago who led the study.

And as more researchers pile onto the same scientific bandwagons, some experts worry about a feedback loop of conformity and declining originality. “This is very problematic,” says Luís Nunes Amaral, a physicist who studies complex systems at Northwestern University. “We are digging the same hole deeper and deeper.”

Evans and his colleagues published the findings January 14 in the journal Nature.

«

unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Ring-necked parakeets in Hertfordshire have developed a taste for.. mortar. CC-licensed photo by Marie Hale on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 11 links for you. No crackers? I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

My Fitbit buzzed – and I understood enshittification • Software Design: Tidy First?

Kent Beck:

»

My Fitbit started buzzing at me a year ago. “It looks like you’re exercising.”

Yeah. No shit. I’m walking. I know I’m exercising. I’m the one doing it.

I didn’t ask for this notification. I don’t want this notification. Nobody wants to be told what they’re already doing. And yet, here we are.

I was annoyed for about thirty seconds. Then I started thinking about what it must be like to be a product developer inside Fitbit. That’s the advantage of walking as exercise. Time to think.

You’re a product owner. You have a feature to ship: “Automatic Exercise Detection.” It’s a reasonable feature. The watch notices when you start moving in exercise-like ways and begins tracking.

But here’s your problem: how do you know the feature is working? How do you prove it’s valuable? How do you keep your job?

You need metrics. You need numbers that go up.

So you add a notification. “It looks like you’re exercising.” Now you can measure engagement. Users are responding to your feature. They’re seeing it. They’re interacting with it. Your numbers go up. Your feature is a success. You get to stay employed.

Then users get annoyed. Some of them complain. So you add a setting to turn it off. But you default it to “on” because that keeps your numbers up. Most users won’t find the setting. Most users will just… tolerate it.

I can’t blame this product owner. They’re playing the only game available to them. The company set up incentives that reward exactly this behavior. What else were they supposed to do?

I’ve been thinking about this pattern ever since Cory Doctorow coined “enshittification” to describe how platforms decay. But I don’t think we’ve been precise enough about the mechanism.

It’s not that companies decide to make their products worse. Nobody wakes up thinking, “Let’s annoy our users today.” The mechanism is subtler and more tragic

«

A clever, sympathetic post which looks at how this happens with what seem like entirely reasonable decisions that lead, inexorably, to bad outcomes.
unique link to this extract

Asus confirms its smartphone business is on indefinite hiatus • Ars Technica

Ryan Whitwam:

»

Asus used to be a major player in the Android device ecosystem, offering myriad phones, tablets, phones that turned into tablets, and tablets that turned into PCs (sort of). The rapidly expanding market and advancing technology in the late 2000s and early 2010s left room for companies like Asus to operate alongside bigger OEMs like Samsung and Apple. Those were the days when every smartphone preference was served, from keyboarded sliders, to devices with integrated projectors, to the flat slab phones that eventually won out.

Today, smartphones have become a mature technology, and there simply isn’t as much room for improvement year-to-year. Combine that with rising prices, and people are apt to keep their devices longer. The continued rise of Chinese OEMs like Vivo, Xiaomi, and Huawei also makes it more difficult for niche players—particularly those focused on markets outside the US—to earn money designing and manufacturing a new smartphone every year. And as soon as you stop doing that, other brands are faster and more well-supported when the time does come to pick up a new phone.

So far, no Android device maker that has taken a break from releasing phones has ever ramped back up. Just ask LG, which once traded blows with hometown rival Samsung in smartphones. LG’s mobile division lost money for years, leading it to scale back its release schedule in 2019. At the time, the company was adamant it would release new phones when it had a good reason. A few years later, LG’s mobile division called it quits. [Sony also gave up on smartphones in the Twenty-teens – Overspill Ed]

The possible end of Asus phones further narrows the market, leaving phone buyers with fewer choices. That doesn’t matter to Asus, though, which is a company that exists to make money. While announcing an indefinite pause in smartphone releases, Shih also noted that the company saw a 26.1% increase in revenue for 2025, thanks in large part to a doubling of its AI server business.

«

My reaction is the same as yours: Asus had a smartphone business?

unique link to this extract

Threads edges out X in daily mobile users, new data shows • TechCrunch

Sarah Perez:

»

A report from market intelligence firm Similarweb suggests that Meta’s Threads is now seeing more daily usage than Elon Musk’s X on mobile devices. While X still dominates Threads on the web, the Threads mobile app for iOS and Android has continued to see an increase in daily active users over the past several months.

Similarweb’s data shows that Threads had 141.5 million daily active users on iOS and Android as of January 7, 2026, after months of growth, while X has 125 million daily active users on mobile devices.

This appears to be the result of longer-term trends, rather than a reaction to the recent X controversies, where users were discovered using the platform’s integrated AI, Grok, to create non-consensual nude images of women, including, sometimes minors. Concern around the deepfake images has now prompted California’s attorney general to open an investigation into Grok, following similar investigations by other regions, like the UK, EU, India, Brazil, and many more.

The drama on X also led social networking startup Bluesky to see an increase in app installs in recent days.

«

All this may be true, but I’ve never seen a post on Threads go viral across other networks. It seems to be a write-only network, or some sort of black hole in social media: stuff goes in but never comes out.

As for Bluesky, the stats seem to show a small uptick – but it’s still very much a minority pursuit.
unique link to this extract

October 2021: Adobe’s Scott Belsky on how NFTs will change creativity • The Verge

In October 2021 Verge editor-in-chief Nilay Patel interviewed Adobe’s chief product officer Scott Belsky:

»

»

NP: I have a quote here from a Medium post that you wrote: “The NFT world is likely the greatest unlock of artist opportunity in a hundred-plus years. This isn’t a suboptimal or fringe version of the real-world art economy. It is a vastly improved one.” I would say I’m maybe less bullish on NFTs, but tell me why you think they’re so revolutionary.

«

SB: And let me be clear; I’m revolutionary on the technology of NFTs. I am not suggesting that the current boom of people trading them and buying them and selling them and these series and all that stuff is here to stay. In fact, my opinion would be that there’s going to be more crashes before more booms. However, I have just never seen a more empowering and better-aligned system for creativity than NFTs. You make an NFT and you not only get the primary sale revenue of it, but then you also, based on the contract you’re using, can get a percentage of every secondary sale forever. That blows out of the water any other form of art, in galleries and anything else for that matter — the attribution is always there for you. You always have a connection to your collectors.

Again, it doesn’t exist in the real world with artists. It’s very good luck if you can even ever meet the artist that made your work. Just when you go down the line, it’s just better, better, better, better, better, better. And what it’s incentivizing is creativity. Artists are realizing, “Oh my goodness, I should make these NFTs that have this nature to them and I can airdrop new versions of this NFT to my collectors, just surprising them, delighting them, and I can have a relationship with them.

«

A nice little bit of Totally Wrong, just to remind you that just because someone is in an exalted position at a Big Tech Company, it doesn’t mean they have the faintest idea about how things are going to pan out. Of course Elon Musk has been proving this to us again and again (along with making ridiculous predictions that can never come true), but it’s good to know the lack of insight goes much wider.
unique link to this extract

Parakeets feeding on Welwyn barn wall display “Amazonian behaviour” • BBC News

»

A flock of ring-necked parakeets that were filmed feasting on the wall of a 19th Century barn were echoing Amazonian feeding habits, an expert has explained.

A video of the birds, who were on a farm near Welwyn in Hertfordshire, was shared widely on social media last month.

Jack Baddams, an ornithologist and researcher for the BBC’s Springwatch programme, explained the parakeets were eating the barn’s mortar to consume its minerals and salts to supplement their diet: “This was really cool when I saw this video because I’ve seen a similar behaviour out in the Amazon.”

Natalie Bosher, who owns the barn, said: “I just couldn’t believe what I was seeing in Hertfordshire.”

The species are the UK’s only naturalised parrot, external.

«

In Hertfordshire! Might make for an interesting insurance claim. “Cause of barn collapse: parakeets eating mortar.”
unique link to this extract

New study reaffirms blue zones’ longevity claims • Longevity Technology

Kyle Umipig:

»

“Blue zones” have occupied a strange place in the longevity conversation. Celebrated by wellness circles. Questioned by critics and skeptics. And of course, inevitably, caught in the crossroads between science and self-help.

These regions – including Okinawa in Japan, Sardinia in Italy, Ikaria in Greece and Costa Rica’s Nicoya Peninsula – are known for producing unusually high numbers of people who live well into their 90s and beyond. Recently, however, critics outside the field of gerontology have argued that blue zones may be built on shaky foundations.

Now, a new peer-reviewed paper published in The Gerontologist offers the most detailed scientific response yet, and it lands firmly in defense of blue zones.

The paper, The validity of blue zones demography: a response to critiques, is leaving a straightforward message: the ages reported in the original blue zones have been validated using some of the strictest methods available in modern demographic science.

According to author Dr Steven Austad, Scientific Director of the American Federation for Aging Research, while remarkable assertions regarding lifespan require equally remarkable proof, the research demonstrates that the original blue zones consistently meet or exceed the rigorous global standards used to verify extreme longevity.

This is not a defense built on belief, but based on decades of work designed precisely to address one historical reality: that people have exaggerated their ages for centuries.

In this debate, there is one simple question: how do researchers know someone is really 100 years old? The study authors said the answer lies in cross-checking. Rather than relying on self-reported ages, blue zone research draws from multiple independent records. These include civil birth and death certificates, church archives, military and electoral registries and detailed family genealogies.

«

I remain doubtful about this: the debunking of the “blue zones” concept in 2023 was pretty thorough, pointing out that many of the birth certificates were unreliable, and that some of the people weren’t actually alive – they were scams on the pension system.
unique link to this extract

He called himself an ‘untouchable hacker god’. But who was behind the biggest crime Finland has ever known? • The Guardian

Jenny Kleeman:

»

At 2am on 23 October 2020 – the day before the emails began to arrive in tens of thousands of inboxes – ransom_man had uploaded a much larger file. It contained every record of every single patient on Vastaamo’s database. Everyone’s therapy notes had already been published, for free, for everyone in the world to see.

Who was behind the biggest crime Finland had ever known? And might they have been motivated by something other than money? I have spent 18 months trying to answer these questions, following threads across Europe and the US. They culminated in a visit to a prison, and one of the most chilling conversations I have ever had.

…After ransom_man started leaking patient records to put pressure on the company, [security specialist and former cybercrime detective Antti] Kurittu kept a close eye on the server being used to publish them. He had a hunch whoever was behind this was either Finnish, or had lived in Finland for a long time: they knew which famous names to flaunt from the patient records.

…Police made a micropayment of 0.1 bitcoins to ransom_man. They were able to determine that, when it was laundered into real-world currency, it was transferred into [known hacker Aleksanteri “Julius”] Kivimäki’s bank account. The home folder ransom_man had accidentally uploaded had led the police to some servers, one of which had been paid for using a credit card linked to him – the same one he’d been using to pay for Apple services and an OnlyFans subscription.

…On 30 April 2024, Kivimäki was found guilty of all charges – including 9,600 counts of aggravated invasion of privacy and more than 21,300 counts of attempted aggravated extortion – and sentenced to six years and three months in prison: a long stretch by Finnish standards, but shy of the seven-year maximum he could have received. His appeal against his sentence is currently under way.

Even if his conviction is upheld, he will be a free man by the end of this year.

«

Hardly surprising that someone who hacked a Finnish organisation is Finnish: it’s a uniquely difficult language, unrelated to its Nordic neighbours, so Kurittu’s job was surely made a lot easier. Most hackers grow out of it; Kivimäki is 28, but the interview in the article makes him sound like a psychopath.
unique link to this extract

Is this man the future of music – or its executioner? AI evangelist Mikey Shulman says he’s making pop, not slop • The Guardian

Eamonn Forde:

»

There remains debate about where exactly Suno sourced the music to train its systems – essentially breaking music into data strands for cataloguing – before its licensing deals were in place. “We train our models on medium- and high-quality music we can find on the open internet,” wrote Shulman in a 2024 blogpost. Suno’s initial legal defence was that this constituted fair use, and the music it drew on did not require prior permission. The record industry thought differently. “Fair use,” countered the RIAA, does not apply “when the output seeks to ‘substitute’ for the work copied.”

I ask Shulman what he means by the “open internet”. There is a clear distinction between what is copyrighted (recordings are typically protected for 70 years) and what is in the public domain. “Copyright is a different thing,” he says. “I can’t get into too many specifics because there is active legal stuff going on, and also some of it is trade secrets.”

Could Suno’s philosophy of “democratising” music-making be inherently anti-art? What once sprang from extraordinary human creativity now becomes ordinary. Shulman insists that, as with digital recording or sampling, this is just another example of how technology “pushes music forward”, how “new people get discovered” and “new genres get invented”.

The issue of so-called AI slop is wholly subjective, he says. “I made a really funny song with my four-year-old yesterday morning. That is ‘slop’ to you – you don’t care about it – but I love it. It’s fantastic.” He is keen to stress, meanwhile, that music generated by Suno can be extremely high quality.

And AI-powered music is flooding streaming services: Deezer says more than a third of music delivered to it each day is AI (equal to 50,000 tracks), and 70% of streams of AI music on Deezer are fraudulent (scammers get cheaply made AI tracks on to such services, then use bots to manipulate streams at scale in order to get royalty payments, although services are increasingly wise to this).

«

unique link to this extract

Inventor building AI-powered suicide chamber • Futurism

Frank Landymore:

»

The inventor of a controversial suicide pod is making sure his device keeps up with the times by augmenting it with AI tech — which, we regret to inform you, is not merely some sort of dark joke.

“One of the parts to the device which hadn’t been finished, but is now finished, is the artificial intelligence,” the inventor, Philip Nitschke, told the Daily Mail in a new interview.

Named the Sarco pod after the ancient sarcophagus, the euthanasia chamber, first built in 2019, has been championed by the pro-assisted dying organization The Last Resort. In 2024, it was used to facilitate the suicide of a 64-year-old woman in Switzerland. The 3D-printed pod is activated when the person seeking to take their own life presses a button, filling the sealed, futuristic-looking coffin with nitrogen that causes the user to lose consciousness and “peacefully” pass away within a few minutes.

To date, the woman’s death in Switzerland is the only case of the Sarco pod seeing real-world action. Soon after she died, Swiss authorities showed up at the sylvan cabin where the pod was located and arrested the late Florian Willet, then co-president of Last Resort, who was supervising her death, on suspicion of aiding and abetting a suicide. He was ultimately released two months later.  

Assisted dying is technically legal in Switzerland, but only if the person seeking suicide is deemed to have the mental capacity to make the decision, and only if they carry out the suicide themselves, rather than a third-party.

That last bit is why the patient presses the button to activate the chamber, a workaround that stands on legally shaky ground as it is (hence Willet’s arrest). Even more contestable is determining whether the patient is capable of making their mortal decision — which, of course, is where AI enters the picture.

As Nitschke was designing a “Double Dutch” version of the Sarco pod that would allow couples to die together, he stumbled on the idea of using AI to administer a psychiatric “test” to determine their mental capacity. If they pass the AI’s judgment, it activates the “power to switch on the Sarco.”

«

To be honest, I’m not reassured by AI entering the decision tree at that point, or at any point potentially involving my death.
unique link to this extract

The longest solar eclipse for 100 years is coming. Don’t miss it • WIRED

Jorge Garay:

»

The duration of a total solar eclipse always varies. In April 2024, the eclipse that crossed North America lasted 4 minutes and 28 seconds. By contrast, the one that will reach Spain in August 2026 will only last 1 minute and 43 seconds. In less than two years, both will be put to shame by the longest conjunction of the century.

According to NASA’s solar eclipse calendar, the longest solar eclipse in 100 years will occur on August 2, 2027. Its total phase will last 6 minutes and 23 seconds. During that time, regions of Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East will be under the moon’s shadow.

According to the NASA map, the eclipse will begin in Morocco and southern Spain. It will then advance through Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, culminating in Yemen and the coast of Somalia. Its maximum duration will be recorded in Egypt, specifically in Luxor and Aswan, famous for their funerary temples.

Despite rampant conspiracy theories around every solar eclipse, they don’t affect your health or have any physical impact on the planet. It is a natural and predictable astronomical phenomenon, the result of the interaction between the sun, the moon and the Earth.

«

I’ve never been in a totality; people say it’s an amazing experience. Maybe Morocco would be the place to see it?
unique link to this extract

America is slow-walking into a Polymarket disaster • The Atlantic

Saahil Desai:

»

The problem is that prediction markets are ushering in a world in which news becomes as much about gambling as about the event itself. This kind of thing has already happened to sports, where the language of “parlays” and “covering the spread” has infiltrated every inch of commentary. ESPN partners with DraftKings to bring its odds to SportsCenter and Monday Night Football; CBS Sports has a betting vertical; FanDuel runs its own streaming network. But the stakes of Greenland’s future are more consequential than the NFL playoffs.

The more that prediction markets are treated like news, especially heading into another election, the more every dip and swing in the odds may end up wildly misleading people about what might happen, or influencing what happens in the real world. Yet it’s unclear whether these sites are meaningful predictors of anything. After the Golden Globes, Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan excitedly posted that his site had correctly predicted 26 of 28 winners, which seems impressive—but Hollywood awards shows are generally predictable. One recent study found that Polymarket’s forecasts in the weeks before the 2024 election were not much better than chance.

…The irony of prediction markets is that they are supposed to be a more trustworthy way of gleaning the future than internet clickbait and half-baked punditry, but they risk shredding whatever shared trust we still have left. The suspiciously well-timed bets that one Polymarket user placed right before the capture of Nicolás Maduro may have been just a stroke of phenomenal luck that netted a roughly $400,000 payout. Or maybe someone with inside information was looking for easy money. Last week, when White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt abruptly ended her briefing after 64 minutes and 30 seconds, many traders were outraged, because they had predicted (with 98% odds) that the briefing would run past 65 minutes. Some suspected, with no evidence, that Leavitt had deliberately stopped before the 65-minute mark to turn a profit. (When I asked the White House about this, the spokesperson Davis Ingle told me in a statement, “This is a 100% Fake News narrative.”)

Unintentionally or not, this is what happens when media outlets normalize treating every piece of news and entertainment as something to wager on. As Tarek Mansour, Kalshi’s CEO, has said, his long-term goal is to “financialize everything and create a tradable asset out of any difference in opinion.”

«

(Gift link for the full article.)
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Counterintuitively, the US has too *many* bus stops to make its bus services efficient. CC-licensed photo by Matt on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 9 links for you. Not stopping here. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

Why Greenland’s natural resources are nearly impossible to mine • The Week UK

Justin Klawans:

»

The island’s frigid, Arctic climate serves as the main culprit for challenging mining. Most of Greenland’s natural resources are “located in remote areas above the Arctic Circle, where there is a mile-thick polar ice sheet and darkness reigns much of the year,” said CNN. While people may understandably think neighboring Iceland is blanketed by ice, Greenland actually has the harsher climate; about “80% of Greenland is covered with ice,” and mining the “Arctic can be five to 10 times more expensive than doing it elsewhere on the planet.”

As a result, most of the efforts to mine Greenland’s minerals “generally haven’t advanced beyond the exploratory stage,” said The Associated Press. And beyond the weather playing a major factor, the remote areas where many of these elements are located also present a problem. Even in southern Greenland, where the island is “populated, there are few roads and no railways, so any mining venture would have to create these accessibilities,” said Diogo Rosa, an economic geology researcher with the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, to the AP. There is also the question of power, as many of these remote areas don’t have consistent electricity.

As of now, Greenland only has one fully operational mine, which produces anorthosite and is “located deep inside a fjord system with no road access,” said Business Insider. All of the mine’s supplies, including the crew, “arrives by ship during the ice-free months or by helicopter when the fjord freezes over for months on end.” And there may not be another operational mine for a while; on average it “takes 16 years to develop a mine, right from the first idea to the actual mine,” Naaja Nathanielsen, Greenland’s minister responsible for natural resources, said to Business Insider.

It is clear that the “Trump administration might want to dominate the Arctic, not least to gain relative power over Russia and China,” Lukas Slothuus, a postdoctoral research fellow at the U.K.’s University of Sussex, said at The Conversation. But given the challenges with mining, any “natural resource extraction is unlikely to feature centrally.” If foreign powers did find a way to mine in Greenland, this would “reverberate in Copenhagen, as Greenland has a mining profit-sharing agreement with Denmark.”

«

Alternatively, as one person posted on Twitter: “Honestly this is a great premise for a sitcom:

In the icy wasteland of Greenland, a ragtag NATO detachment of 13 Germans, 2 Norwegians, 3 Swedes, 15 French and 1 lone Brit must “defend” the Arctic from… well, mostly boredom, polar bears, and each other’s national stereotypes.

Stationed at a remote outpost in Nuuk, their biggest enemies are cabin fever, frozen plumbing, the Danes who keep forgetting they’re there, and each other. They’re constantly prepping to counter the absurd threat of an American takeover with the total force smaller than a pub trivia team.

The show will have everything – petty national rivalries that project from history, offensive cultural stereotypes, frustration due to NATO bureaucracy, and because this is so European, the whole thing will be pretty gay. Oh and a recurring theme is that they will constantly be picking on the lone Brit.”

Apart from the “gay” bit (why??), I think this should be commissioned at once.
unique link to this extract

RAM shortage chaos expands to GPUs, high-capacity SSDs, and even hard drives • Ars Technica

Andrew Cunningham:

»

Big Tech’s AI-fueled memory shortage is set to be the PC industry’s defining story for 2026 and beyond. Standalone, direct-to-consumer RAM kits were some of the first products to feel the bite, with prices spiking by 300% or 400% by the end of 2025; prices for SSDs had also increased noticeably, albeit more modestly.

The rest of 2026 is going to be all about where, how, and to what extent those price spikes flow downstream into computers, phones, and other components that use RAM and NAND chips—areas where the existing supply of products and longer-term supply contracts negotiated by big companies have helped keep prices from surging too noticeably so far.

This week, we’re seeing signs that the RAM crunch is starting to affect the GPU market—Asus made some waves when it inadvertently announced that it was discontinuing its GeForce RTX 5070 Ti.

Though the company has since tried to walk this announcement back, if you’re a GPU manufacturer, there’s a strong argument for either discontinuing this model or de-prioritizing it in favor of other GPUs. The 5070 Ti uses 16GB of GDDR7, plus a partially disabled version of Nvidia’s GB203 GPU silicon. This is the same chip and the same amount of RAM used in the higher-end RTX 5080—the thinking goes, why continue to build a graphics card with an MSRP of $749 when the same basic parts could go to a card with a $999 MSRP instead?

…SSD prices have been climbing alongside RAM prices for months, but as of last month, the price increases for 500GB, 1TB, and 2TB drives were around twice as expensive as they had been in August 2025, compared to three or four times as expensive for DDR5 RAM kits. But things are moving in a bad direction, and high-capacity SSDs in particular are being hit hard.

If you want a 1TB internal M.2 SSD from a recognizable company, that will generally run you somewhere between $120 and $150—often a little higher than the $135 we recorded for a 1TB WD Blue drive back in January, but not absurdly so.

It’s still possible to find a decent 2TB drive like this SiliconPower model for around $230, the price we quoted for a 2TB Western Digital SN7100 in December. But currently, SSDs from big-name companies like Samsung and WD/SanDisk (currently in a state of flux, but the SanDisk-branded versions of these drives don’t appear to be at retail yet) are either out of stock at many major retailers or have shot up dramatically in price.

«

unique link to this extract

WhatsApp texts are not contracts, judge rules in £1.5m divorce row • The Times

Ed Halford:

»

A divorced painter who claimed her former husband signed over their £1.5 million home in an affluent north London area via WhatsApp has lost a High Court “test case” to keep the property.

Hsiao-mei Lin, 54, a Taiwanese-born British citizen, and the financier Audun Mar Gudmundsson, also 54, married in 2009 but separated seven years later.

During divorce proceedings, Lin was awarded their £1.5m house in Tufnell Park, an area known for its Victorian architecture and home to celebrities such as the actors Damian Lewis and Bill Nighy.

However, Lin, a graduate of the Royal Academy Schools, was unaware that only a week before their divorce, Gudmundsson, who ran a mezzanine finance company, was made bankrupt. It transpired that this was due to the financier owing a former friend and others £2.5m.

Despite a High Court ruling in 2024 declaring that the bankruptcy meant Lin only owned a 50% stake in their family home, she remained determined to prove that Gudmundsson had signed off the entire home to her before divorce proceedings. Lin’s proof, however, was not a watertight legal document but WhatsApp exchanges with her husband.

In a two-day appeal hearing last month, the trustees, Maxine Reid-Roberts and Brian Burke, disputed that these messages validly “disposed of” Gudmundsson’s interest in the house.

…Lin’s lawyers have claimed that because Gudmundsson’s name was in the header to the messages when they reached Lin’s phone they should be considered “signed”.

…Steve Fennel, acting for the trustees, argued that the messages were not signed and were therefore not legally binding. He said that if they were found to be so then the “result will be that a WhatsApp message in and of itself, without a ‘signature’ in the text, will in all cases count as signed for the purposes of all statutory requirements for signature”.

«

Tricky case. But does this mean that just because it came from your phone it isn’t legal? What does that mean for email?
unique link to this extract

Matt Damon: Netflix wants movies to account for viewers on their phone • Variety

Jack Dunn:

»

[The actor Matt] Damon pointed out that because viewers give a “very different level of attention” to a movie at home versus in a theatre, Netflix wants to push the action set pieces toward the front of the runtime. He also said there are behind-the-scenes discussions about reiterating “the plot three or four times in the dialogue” to account for people being on their phones.

“The standard way to make an action movie that we learned was, you usually have three set pieces. One in the first act, one in the second, one in the third,” Damon explained. “You spend most of your money on that one in the third act. That’s your finale. And now they’re like, ‘Can we get a big one in the first five minutes? We want people to stay. And it wouldn’t be terrible if you reiterated the plot three or four times in the dialogue because people are on their phones while they’re watching.'”

[Ben] Affleck then cut in, adding that the streamer formula for successful content isn’t the only way. He used Netflix’s recent limited series hit “Adolescence” as a shining example.

«

This was from an appearance they made on the Joe Rogan show. Can’t decide if it’s surprising or encouraging that all these years after they wrote and appeared in Good Will Hunting, they’re still bumping around together.

The point about restating the plot, though, is part of what’s noxious about streamer-made content. It’s also why some people complained about Pluribus, the new show on Apple TV+, being “too slow”: you have to wait for things to happen, and they don’t explain the plot every five minutes.
unique link to this extract

ChatGPT to start showing ads in the US • The Guardian

Robert Booth:

»

ChatGPT will start including advertisements beside answers for US users as OpenAI seeks a new revenue stream.

The ads will be tested first in ChatGPT for US users only, the company announced on Friday, after increasing speculation that the San Francisco firm would turn to a potential cashflow model on top of its current subscriptions.

The ads will start in the coming weeks and will be included above or below, rather than within, answers. Mock-ups circulated by the company show the ads in a tinted box. They will be served to adult users “when there’s a relevant sponsored product or service based on your current conversation”, according to OpenAI’s announcement. Ads will not be shown to users under 18 and will not appear alongside answers related to sensitive topics such as health, mental health or politics. Users will be able to click to learn about why they received a particular ad, according to OpenAI.

Previously, OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, expressed reluctance to introduce ads to the chatbot: “I kind of hate ads just as an aesthetic choice.” His company has made commitments to spend more than $1tn on infrastructure supporting AI in the coming years. Altman has said that revenues are running at well over $13bn a year.

“Maybe there could be ads outside the [large language model] stream that are still really great, but the burden of proof there would have to be very high. And it would have to feel really useful to users and really clear that it was not messing with the model’s output,” Altman said recently. “I think it’d be very hard, we’d have to take a lot of care to get it right. People have a very high degree of trust in ChatGPT.”

«

As someone observed, Altman has finally achieved his goal of AGI: ad-generated income. Google started showing ads beside search results in October 2000, just two years after it was founded (September 1998). OpenAI is going to start showing adverts 10 years after its December 2015 founding, though only slightly more than three years after going public with ChatGPT in November 2022.

So, basically, it’s running on about the same timeline.
unique link to this extract

How Generative AI is destroying society • Marcus on AI

Gary Marcus, who is generally pessimistic about the big claims made for generative AI, is impressed by this paper:

»

This is one of the most lucid and powerful articles I have read in years. Here’s the opening paragraph.

»

If you wanted to create a tool that would enable the destruction of institutions that prop up democratic life, you could not do better than artificial intelligence. Authoritarian leaders and technology oligarchs are deploying AI systems to hollow out public institutions with an astonishing alacrity. Institutions that structure public governance, rule of law, education, healthcare, journalism, and families are all on the chopping block to be “optimized” by AI. AI boosters defend the technology’s role in dismantling our vital support structures by claiming that AI systems are just efficiency “tools” without substantive significance. But predictive and generative AI systems are not simply neutral conduits to help executives, bureaucrats, and elected leaders do what they were going to do anyway, only more cost-effectively. The very design of these systems is antithetical to and degrades the core functions of essential civic institutions, such as administrative agencies and universities.

«

In the third paragraph they lay out their central point:

»

In this Article, we hope to convince you of one simple and urgent point: the current design of artificial intelligence systems facilitates the degradation and destruction of our critical civic institutions. Even if predictive and generative AI systems are not directly used to eradicate these institutions, AI systems by their nature weaken the institutions to the point of enfeeblement. To clarify, we are not arguing that AI is a neutral or general purpose tool that can be used to destroy these institutions. Rather, we are arguing that AI’s current core functionality—that is, if it is used according to its design—will progressively exact a toll upon the institutions that support modern democratic life. The more AI is deployed in our existing economic and social systems, the more the institutions will become ossified and delegitimized. Regardless of whether tech companies intend this destruction, the key attributes of AI systems are anathema to the kind of cooperation, transparency, accountability, and evolution that give vital institutions their purpose and sustainability. In short, AI systems are a death sentence for civic institutions, and we should treat them as such.

«

«

unique link to this extract

The United States needs fewer bus stops • Works in Progress Magazine

Nithin Vejendla:

»

When people talk about improving transit, they mention ambitious rail tunnels and shiny new trains. But they less often discuss the humble bus – which moves more people than rail in the US, the EU, and the UK – and whose ridership has bounced back more quickly after Covid than rail.

The problem with buses is that they are slow. For example, buses in New York City and San Francisco crawl along at a paltry eight miles per hour, only about double walking speeds in the fastest countries. There are lots of ways to speed up buses, including bus lanes and busways, congestion pricing, transit-priority signals, and all-door boarding. But one of the most powerful solutions requires no new infrastructure or controversial charges and has minimal cost: optimizing where buses stop. 

Buses in some cities, particularly those in the US, stop far more frequently than those in continental Europe. Frequent stopping makes service slower, less reliable, and more expensive to operate. This makes buses less competitive with other modes, reducing ridership. This is why, despite having fewer bus stops, European buses have a higher share of total trips than American ones.

Bus stop balancing involves strategically increasing the distance between stops from 700–800 feet (roughly 210–240 metres), common in older American cities or in London, to 1,300 feet, closer to the typical spacing in Western Europe, such as in Hanover, Germany. Unlike many transit improvements, stop balancing can be implemented quickly, cheaply, and independently by transit agencies. By removing signs and updating schedules, transit agencies can deliver faster service, better reliability, and more service with the same resources. 

American bus stops are often significantly closer together than European ones. The mean stop spacing in the United States is around 313m, which is about five stops per mile. However, in older, larger American cities, stops are placed even closer. In Chicago, Philadelphia, and San Francisco, the mean spacing drops down to 223m, 214m, and 248m respectively, meaning as many as eight stops per mile. By contrast, in Europe it’s more common to see spacings of 300m to 450m, roughly four stops per mile. An additional 500 feet takes between 1.5 and 2.5 minutes to walk at the average pace of 2.5 to 4 miles per hour.

«

As you can imagine, having lots of bus stops slows a bus down, and means drivers (paid by the hour) travel less far, so you don’t carry as many people and they get where they’re going more slowly.
unique link to this extract

Remembering the time an Islington Street was renamed… backwards • Londonist

Matt Brown:

»

Does anywhere else in London do this?

You might well have wandered along Muriel Street. It’s the leafy residential road you’re forced to join, if you follow the Regent’s Canal east of King’s Cross (the canal heads into its Islington tunnel at this point).

Head north along Muriel Street and pass through a pedestrianised cutting, and you’ll emerge onto Leirum Street. It surely cannot be a coincidence that Leirum is Muriel backwards. What’s going on?

Turns out that both streets were once part of a united Muriel Street. However, the ‘pedestrian bit’ in the middle was causing confusion, and could lead to potential delays for emergency vehicles attending the wrong section.

In 2013, the Barnsbury Estate’s Tenant Management Association wrote to Islington Council requesting a change. Rather than invoking a new name, however, it was decided to simply run the letters backwards. The northern stretch thus became Leirum Street.

“It is ridiculous and it looks like a big balls up,” long-term resident Kath Wardely told the Evening Standard at the time. “I think they got the stencil the wrong way round and now they are trying to cover it up.”

The tenant association probably wanted to say: “That’s not how stencils work, Kath”, but instead responded to say that residents had been consulted in advance. Islington Council also chimed in to confirm that “Some residents thought it was a cock-up, but it was a quite deliberate decision.”

«

That’s rather clever. As long as you pick a road that’s pronounceable backwards.
unique link to this extract

To those who fired or didn’t hire tech writers because of AI • passo.uno

Fabrizio Ferri Benedetti:

»

You might think that the plausible taste of AI prose is all you need to give your products a voice. You paste code into a field and something that resembles docs comes out after a few minutes. Like a student eager to turn homework in, you might be tempted to content yourself with docs theatre, thinking that it’ll earn you a good grade. It won’t, because docs aren’t just artifacts.

When you say “docs”, you’re careful to focus on the output, omitting the process. Perhaps you don’t know how docs are produced. You’ve forgotten, or perhaps never knew, that docs are product truth; that without them, software becomes unusable, because software is never done, is never obvious, and is never simple. Producing those docs requires tech writers.

Tech writers go to great lengths to get the information they need. They write so that your audience can understand. They hunger for clarity and meaning and impact. They power through weeks full of deadlines, chasing product news, because without their reporting, most products wouldn’t thrive; some wouldn’t even exist. Their docs aren’t a byproduct: they tie the product together.

An LLM can’t do all that, because it can’t feel the pain of your users. It can’t put itself into their shoes. It lacks the kind of empathy that’s behind great help content. It does not, in fact, have any empathy at all, because it cannot care. You need folks who will care, because content is a hairy beast that can only be tamed by agents made of flesh and capable of emotions: humans.

«

This is certainly true about writing technical documents. You need people to have understood what’s going on. An LLM won’t do that.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

If you want to buy a Hermes Birkin bag, be prepared to be treated with suspicion by the company itself. And don’t wear the wrong watch. CC-licensed photo by Yvette Ilagan on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 9 links for you. Do parrots like them though? I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.

How WhatsApp took over the global conversation • The New Yorker

Sam Knight:

»

British politics and, arguably, the British state are coördinated by WhatsApp. Ninety-two% of U.K. internet users are on the platform. Police officers banter on it. The National Health Service relies on it. On the afternoon of March 13, 2020—ten days before the U.K. entered its first covid lockdown—Dominic Cummings, a senior adviser to Prime Minister Boris Johnson, formed a five-man WhatsApp group that came to more or less run the country.

That fall, a reporter from the Daily Mail asked a government spokesperson, via WhatsApp, whether it was true that national policies were being conceived this way. The spokesperson WhatsApped Simon Case, the country’s most senior civil servant, with a suggested response: “the PM does not make government decisions via WhatsApp.” Case replied on WhatsApp less than a minute later: “Erm—is that true? I am not sure it is. I think we will have to ignore.”

…WhatsApp is phatic before it is anything else. It is an architecture of presence. It winks with life, informing you who is online and when they were last seen. Tiny bundles of data—relayed on the app’s servers through sockets, or continuous connections—tell you that your best friend is typing. Koum introduced “read receipts,” to show that texts were being sent and seen. At first, he imagined miniature icons that would represent a message’s odyssey through the network—showing servers and hard drives—but Borzov suggested something simpler: one check mark to show that WhatsApp had received your message and two to show that it had been delivered. When the message was opened, the check marks turned blue.

Blue check marks have saved some lives (WhatsApp is often the platform of choice for disaster responders) and tested many relationships. Whether to respond to a message that someone knows you have read with a heart, a thumbs-up, or a crying-face emoji is a modern-day imponderable, although I’m pretty sure that Malinowski would have taken a hard line on the subject. (In phatic conversation, he notes, “taciturnity means not only unfriendliness but directly a bad character.”)

…Sociologists who study WhatsApp family groups sometimes call them W.F.G.s. In 2023, Galit Alkobi and Natalia Khvorostianov, of the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, published a study of Israeli W.F.G.s and suggested that there were three archetypal roles in these groups: kin-keepers, who are committed to online family life; flickerers, who are seemingly indifferent; and silent warm experts, who are problem solvers. We all know who we are. Alkobi conducted forty-three interviews with family members about their W.F.G.s and found that groups encompassing three generations showed extremely similar traits: problematic-discourse avoidance, an exaggerated writing style (exuberant celebrations, morose commiserations), and routine ejections.

«

And there’s plenty more. For the American readers of the New Yorker, of course, all this talk of WhatsApp is puzzling: they tend to use iMessage because the iPhone predominates, or possibly Signal. But now, as Knight points out, it’s growing fast, and there are more than 100 million users there.
unique link to this extract

Grok was finally updated to stop undressing women and children, X Safety says • Ars Technica

Ashley Belanger:

»

Late Wednesday, X Safety confirmed that Grok was tweaked to stop undressing images of people without their consent.

“We have implemented technological measures to prevent the Grok account from allowing the editing of images of real people in revealing clothing such as bikinis,” X Safety said. “This restriction applies to all users, including paid subscribers.”

The update includes restricting “image creation and the ability to edit images via the Grok account on the X platform,” which “are now only available to paid subscribers. This adds an extra layer of protection by helping to ensure that individuals who attempt to abuse the Grok account to violate the law or our policies can be held accountable,” X Safety said. Additionally, X will “geoblock the ability of all users to generate images of real people in bikinis, underwear, and similar attire via the Grok account and in Grok in X in those jurisdictions where it’s illegal,” X Safety said.

X’s update comes after weeks of sexualized images of women and children being generated with Grok finally prompting California Attorney General Rob Bonta to investigate whether Grok’s outputs break any US laws.

In a press release Wednesday, Bonta said that “xAI appears to be facilitating the large-scale production of deepfake nonconsensual intimate images that are being used to harass women and girls across the Internet, including via the social media platform X.” Notably, Bonta appears to be as concerned about Grok’s standalone app and website being used to generate harmful images without consent as he is about the outputs on X.

Before today, X had not restricted the Grok app or website. X had only threatened to permanently suspend users who are editing images to undress women and children if the outputs are deemed “illegal content.” It also restricted the Grok chatbot on X from responding to prompts to undress images, but anyone with a Premium subscription could bypass that restriction, as could any free X user who clicked on the “edit” button on any image appearing on the social platform.

«

Marianna Spring, the BBC’s disinformation correspondent, remarked on a podcast that she could see the problem that was coming when Grok’s image-editing was made widely available, and that UK regulator Ofcom should have too – to say nothing of X and Elon Musk. But Musk is incapable of understanding the malice that exists out there, partly because he’s immersed in it; it’s like asking a fish to comment on the water.
unique link to this extract

The Atlantic, Penske, and Vox Media sue Google for adtech antitrust violations • The Verge

Lauren Feiner:

»

Lawsuits seeking damages from Google’s illegal ad tech monopoly are piling up following the Justice Department’s successful antitrust case. Vox Media, The Verge’s parent company, is the latest in a wave of media companies that have filed suit against Google, seeking to be reimbursed for the monopoly profits the tech company allegedly made at publishers’ expense.

“Absent Google’s conduct, Vox Media would be able to make available even more, higher quality impressions for purchase on Vox Media’s webpages and create more high-quality, premium journalism,” Vox Media alleges in its lawsuit, filed Wednesday in the Southern District of New York. The Atlantic, which is owned by Laurene Powell Jobs, filed a similar lawsuit in the same district this week, as did Penske Media, which is an investor in Vox Media and owns brands including Rolling Stone, Billboard, and The Hollywood Reporter. Later on Wednesday, two more publishers — McClatchy Media Company and Condé Nast owner Advance Publications — filed similar lawsuits. Google is also facing lawsuits from ad tech providers like PubMatic and OpenX, some of which testified in the trial about how Google’s dominance shut out competition.

…The publishers claim Google’s dominance lets it “depress prices for publisher inventory below competitive levels”
The lawsuits underscore the ways that the highly technical subject of the 2024 trial impacts an ecosystem of publishers and tech providers. For example, the media company complaints outline how Google’s illegal monopoly of the market for publisher ad servers, used to manage ad space for sale on publisher websites, has effectively stymied any viable competitors they might consider moving to.

«

unique link to this extract

Microsoft is closing its employee library and cutting back on subscriptions • The Verge

Tom Warren:

»

Microsoft’s library of books is so heavy that it once caused a campus building to sink, according to an unproven legend among employees. Now those physical books, journals, and reports, and many of Microsoft’s digital subscriptions to leading US newspapers, are disappearing in a shift described inside Microsoft as an “AI-powered learning experience.”

Microsoft started cutting back on its employee subscriptions to news and reports services in November, with some publishers receiving an automated email cancellation of a contract. “This correspondence serves as official notification that Microsoft will not renew any existing contracts upon their respective expiration dates,” reads an email from Microsoft’s vendor management team. “We would like to take this opportunity to express our sincere appreciation for your partnership, collaboration, and continued support throughout our engagement.”

Strategic News Service (SNS), which has provided global reports to Microsoft’s roughly 220,000 employees and executives for more than 20 years, is no longer part of Microsoft’s subscription list. In an email to Microsoft employees that relied on SNS reports, the publisher notes that “Microsoft has just released an automated announcement that all library contracts, of which the SNS Global Report is perhaps the most strategic for your own use, are to be turned off.”

Microsoft employees I’ve spoken to recently have lost access to digital publications like The Information. They’re also unable to perform digital checkouts of business books from the Microsoft Library. While Microsoft often rotates the publishers it uses in its Library service, this time it’s part of a much broader change that seems like corporate cost cutting mixed with the continued push for AI.

«

Steven Sinofsky, who worked at Microsoft through its crucial growth years and led the Office team (among others), called it “a crown jewel of the early days”, which bought every PC book and two copies of any piece of software and would get any magazine or article you wanted, if they didn’t have it.

But don’t worry, CoPilot is here to make them up!
unique link to this extract

My work went from air-conditioned offices to delivering food on a bike. The culture shock is significant • The Guardian

David Rayfield started working as a bike messenger in Melbourne:

»

When you deliver for companies like Uber Eats, no two shifts are the same. I’d say 80% of my deliveries are fast food – a combination of McDonald’s, KFC, Hungry Jacks and coffee. Lots of coffee. My new workplace couldn’t be more different than the grey blur of an office, surrounded by the same walls and same people week after week. The culture shock of going from comfy chairs and morning teas to trying not to get killed in traffic was significant.

After being made redundant four times in six years, months passed with hundreds of unsuccessful job applications. Bills needed to be paid. The big ones were still looming, but the small costs could be covered by delivering for Uber Eats. My Xbox was gathering dust so I sold it at Cash Converters and put the money towards a half-decent mountain bike.

The first thing that hits you riding is the feeling of independence. In between delivering Grey Goose vodka and KFC Zinger burgers, there’s the realisation that it’s just you out there. After four months, I haven’t talked to anyone at Uber Eats. I signed up on my phone, they sent me a fluoro thermal bag, and off I went. I don’t have to worry about anybody making me redundant because there is no anybody – there’s just me. If I want to spend hours in the park eating lunch, I will. Need more sleep? That’s between me and my doona. Granted, my wages are much lower, but what value can be placed on listening to Wu-Tang Clan with wind in my hair versus dreading another company restructure?

Just to be clear, my hair is secure underneath a helmet. Which was good for when I collided with a car and ended up with a face full of road. There are lots of bike paths in Melbourne, but far too many of them are squeezed in between moving traffic and parked traffic. They’re less than a metre wide and often occupied by wavering cars, massive trucks or in this case, part of a parked Ford Fiesta. Before I could react, a driver had opened their door into the bike lane without looking. I couldn’t do anything except stop my bike dead while my body crashed into the bitumen.

Things like this happen too often.

…I always knew urban planning was designed around cars but now I feel it in my bones. Not only is the amount of space dedicated to cars immense, society focuses on cars first. Shopfronts and advertisements face the road, hundreds of car parks take up thousands of metres and I avoid countless potholes in bike lanes while the cars right next to me drive on pristine asphalt.

«

unique link to this extract

The third audience is generative AI • Dries Buytaert

Dries Buytaert is the founder of Drupal, the website and blogging platform:

»

I used Claude Code to build a new feature for my site this morning. Any URL on my blog can now return Markdown instead of HTML.

I added a small hint in the HTML to signal that the Markdown version exists, mostly to see what would happen. My plan was to leave it running for a few weeks and write about it later if anything interesting turned up.

Within an hour, I had hundreds of requests from AI crawlers, including ClaudeBot, GPTBot, OpenAI’s SearchBot, and more. So much for waiting a few weeks.

For two decades, we built sites for two audiences: humans and search engines. AI agents are now the third audience, and most websites aren’t optimized for them yet.

We learned how to play the SEO game so our sites would rank in Google. Now people are starting to invest in things like Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) and Answer Engine Optimization (AEO).

…The speed of adoption tells me AI agents are hungry for cleaner content formats and will use them the moment they find them. What I don’t know yet is whether this actually benefits me. It might lead to more visibility in AI answers, or it might just make it easier for AI companies to use my content without sending traffic back.

«

That’s the worry, isn’t it? The first audience is real humans. The second is search engines. And now the third one is generative AI, eagerly slurping up anything new or changed. But as Buytaert says, will that bring traffic?
unique link to this extract

Home address, social media checks: how Hermes stalks would-be buyers before (and after) selling a Birkin • NDTV

Dristi Sharma:

»

At first glance, buying a luxury handbag should be simple enough if you have the money. Walk into a boutique, choose what you like, pay, leave. But at Hermes, one of the world’s most powerful luxury houses, money alone rarely guarantees access. Instead, shoppers are quietly inducted into what even loyal clients jokingly call the “Hermes game” a complex, opaque system where patience, perception and behaviour matter as much as spending power.

The conversation around this unwritten game sharpened last week when Hermes hosted an ultra-exclusive private sale in Paris, open only to a shrinking and tightly vetted circle of clients. At the same time, prices for leather goods and ready-to-wear quietly rose, according to Glitz. The timing was telling. This was not a routine price hike, but another signal of how firmly Hermes is tightening control over access, scarcity and status.

…Ironically, while Hermes emphasises “relationships”, clients increasingly find it difficult to build genuine rapport with sales associates. Staff are encouraged to avoid overt familiarity, as relationships deemed too close can trigger managerial suspicion around favouritism or resale risks.

This creates a structural mistrust that stiffens interactions and undermines the warm, personalised experience luxury retail typically promises. From the brand’s perspective, this rigidity serves a purpose. Control is central to the Hermes model. The goal is not merely to sell bags, but to protect the symbolic power of scarcity that surrounds them.

The booming second-hand luxury market and stricter anti-money-laundering regulations have intensified this scrutiny. As one sales associate at a major Paris boutique told Glitz, “Every new client is automatically a suspect.” Staff now collect and assess far more data than before, from home addresses and their perceived prestige to social media activity and online presence. Sales associates are trained to evaluate whether a client’s buying journey appears coherent.

Rapid accumulation of non-quota bags to hit a spending threshold raises red flags, as does shopping across multiple boutiques or countries. Furniture purchases, interestingly, score highly, signalling long-term commitment rather than quick flips. Loyalty to one store, cross-category shopping and a clear alignment with the Hermes universe all work in a client’s favour.

Even subtle signals matter. Wearing an Audemars Piguet or Richard Mille watch is read positively, while a flashy Rolex may be judged ostentatious.

«

Please enjoy this glimpse into another, weirdly suspicious world.
unique link to this extract

How to manipulate prediction markets for your greater good • Polemic Paine

Polemic Paine:

»

It’s 8PM Eastern Time on January 14th, 2026. In four hours, a Polymarket bet will resolve.

Earlier today, an account called “mutualdelta”, so fresh it still had that new-car smell, dropped over $160,000 on “Yes” for a US military strike on Iran by end of day. They scaled it to over $240,000 as the day progressed. The odds, which had been languishing around 14%, shot up to 25%. Twitter lost its mind.

Real-time tracking threads. Speculation about insider knowledge. The whole circus.

The market closes at 11:59 PM ET tonight. As I write this, no strike has occurred. The bet is most likely going to zero.

And somewhere, I’m fairly certain, someone is counting their money.

Just not from Polymarket.

«

As you’ll now know, the attack didn’t happen, and so the money was lost. So why make the dramatic money-losing bet? In order to make money somewhere else, as the writer explains. It’s complicated, but makes total sense, and shows why you really shouldn’t pay too much attention to Polymarket (a predictions betting market) – or at least not take it entirely seriously.
unique link to this extract

New UK offshore wind farms could significantly cut power prices • Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit

»

The 8.4GW of offshore wind power announced this week in the Contracts for Difference (CfDs) auction Allocation Round 7 (AR7) is set to boost clean power output, such that – had these wind farms been operating over the last year – gas power generation could have been a third (35%) lower, cutting day-ahead wholesale electricity prices by up to £11 per MWh (13%), down to £72/MWh, according to analysis by the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU).

The price reductions caused by these new renewables would have been on top of the savings delivered by operational wind farms pushing gas off the system, which cut the average price by around £38/MWh in 2025, down from £121/MWh to £83/MWh. [3]

Taken together, these results suggest that, had Britain deployed no wind power over recent decades and had instead relied more on gas, power prices could have been up to £49/MWh (67% i.e. two-thirds) higher in 2025 compared to if renewables had been rolled out faster. [4]

Jess Ralston, Energy Analyst at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, said: “It might not be itemised on bills, but more British renewables squeezing gas off the system has the effect of reducing wholesale power prices, lowering those costs for both industry and households.

“There’s lots of large numbers being bandied around, but the reality is that the offshore wind projects secured today are likely to see levies on bills break-even. And in the event of another gas price spike, which given uncertainty in petro-states worldwide is possible, could see billpayers paid back.”

«

Various 19th century loons have come out of the woodwork at the announcement of this nuclear power station’s worth of wind, which they’re sure could be more cheaply done with gas, ignoring the volatility of gas prices and its greenhouse effects.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified