The Voyager spacecraft has suffered the same fate as HAL: gone mad in the vastness of space. CC-licensed photo by Tutoriales CIS on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

There’s another post coming this week at the Social Warming Substack on Friday at 0845 UK time. Free signup.

A selection of 10 links for you. Major Tom too? I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. Observations and links welcome.

Why The New York Times might win its copyright lawsuit against OpenAI • Ars Technica

Timothy Lee and James Grimmelmann:

»

This article is written by two authors. One of us is a journalist who has been on the copyright beat for nearly 20 years. The other is a law professor who has taught dozens of courses on IP and Internet law. We’re pretty sure we understand how copyright works. And we’re here to warn the AI community that it needs to take these lawsuits seriously.

In its blog post responding to the Times lawsuit, OpenAI wrote that “training AI models using publicly available Internet materials is fair use, as supported by long-standing and widely accepted precedents.”

The most important of these precedents is a 2015 decision that allowed Google to scan millions of copyrighted books to create a search engine. We expect OpenAI to argue that the Google ruling allows OpenAI to use copyrighted documents to train its generative models. Stability AI and Anthropic will undoubtedly make similar arguments as they face copyright lawsuits of their own.

These defendants could win in court—but they could lose, too. As we’ll see, AI companies are on shakier legal ground than Google was in its book search case. And the courts don’t always side with technology companies in cases where companies make copies to build their systems. The story of MP3.com illustrates the kind of legal peril AI companies could face in the coming years.

«

Well, they make an argument. Perhaps Mike Masnick (see below) will be along in a week or so to tell us how wrong they are, because credentials aren’t necessarily what wins legal arguments; the precision of your argument is.
unique link to this extract

Has Wired given up on fact checking, given its facts-optional screed against Section 230 that gets almost everything wrong? • Techdirt

Mike Masnick:

»

let’s return to this article. The title is “The One Internet Hack That Could Save Everything.” With the provocative subhed: “It’s so simple: Axe 26 words from the Communications Decency Act. Welcome to a world without Section 230.”

Now, we’ve spent the better part of the last 25 years debunking nonsense about Section 230, but this may be the worst piece we’ve ever seen on this topic. It does not understand how Section 230 works. It does not understand how the First Amendment works. It’s not clear it understands how the internet works.
But also, it’s just not well written. I was completely confused about the point that the article is trying to make, and it was only on the third reading that I finally understood the extraordinarily wrong point that is at the heart of the article: that if you got rid of Section 230, websites would have to moderate based on the First Amendment — but also they would magically get rid of harassment and other bad content, but be forced to leave up the good content. It’s magic fairytale thinking that has nothing to do with reality. There’s also some nonsense about privacy and copyright that have nothing to do with Section 230 at all, but the authors seem wholly unaware of that fairly basic fact.

I’m going to skip over the first section of the article, because it’s just confused babble, and move onto some really weird claims about Section 230. Specifically, that it somehow created a business model.

… Literally none of that makes sense, nor is any citation or explanation given for what is entirely a “vibes” based argument. Section 230 has nothing to do with the advertising market directly. Advertising existed prior to Section 230 and has been a way to subsidize content going back centuries. It’s unclear how the authors think Section 230 is somehow responsible for internet advertising as a business model, and the article does nothing to clarify why that would be the case. Because it’s just wrong. There is no way to support it.

«

I’m glad that Mike Masnick has decided to go into detail about that terrible, terrible S230 article, because if he had thought it had any merit I’d be seriously worried that I’d lost my bearings. Generally, if I find myself disagreeing with Masnick, I consider my position carefully because there’s a high probability it’s me that’s wrong.
unique link to this extract

Google’s retiring of Internet archiving tool draws ire of China researchers • Al Jazeera

Erin Hale:

»

Late last year, Google began quietly removing links to cached pages from its search results, a function that had allowed Internet users to view old versions of web pages.

Danny Sullivan, Google’s public liaison for search, confirmed earlier this month that the function had been discontinued. “It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading. These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it,” Sullivan said in a post on X earlier this month.

Although originally introduced to improve internet performance, Google’s cache function had the unintended effect of boosting transparency and became an invaluable resource for researchers.

Academics, journalists and others used cached pages to view past incarnations of websites and deleted content – a particularly useful tool for China’s internet, which Beijing carefully edits to avoid embarrassment and ward off potential dissent.

“The loss of the Google cache function will be a blow to China researchers who have long leaned on this function to preserve access to information that may later be removed, particularly in research citations,” Kendra Schaefer, the head of tech policy research at Trivium China, told Al Jazeera.

A Google spokesperson confirmed the change to Al Jazeera. “Google’s cached page feature was born over two decades ago, at a time when pages might not be dependably available. The web – and web serving as a whole – has greatly improved since then, making the need for cached pages less necessary,” the spokesperson said by email.

China’s “Great Firewall” means that popular sites from Wikipedia to Facebook are inaccessible without a virtual private network, while its government censors trawl the web for sensitive content to remove.

…There are alternatives to Google’s cached pages, namely the non-profit Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine.

But Google’s removal of cached links makes it harder to know what is missing in the first place, said Dakota Cary, a non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Global China Hub.

«

unique link to this extract

The lonely, lonely death of Voyager • Crooked Timber

Doug Muir:

»

We thought we knew how [the spacecraft] Voyager would end.  The power would gradually, inevitably, run down.  The instruments would shut off, one by one.  The signal would get fainter.  Eventually either the last instrument would fail for lack of power, or the signal would be lost.

We didn’t expect that it would go mad.

In December 2023, Voyager started sending back gibberish instead of data.  A software glitch, though perhaps caused by an underlying hardware problem; a cosmic ray strike, or a side effect of the low temperatures, or just aging equipment randomly causing some bits to flip.

The problem was, the gibberish was coming from the flight direction software — the operating system, as it were.  And no copy of that operating system remained in existence on Earth.

(This is a problem NASA long since solved.  These days, every space probe that launches, leaves a perfect duplicate back on Earth.  Remember in “The Martian”, how they had another copy of Pathfinder sitting under a tarp in a warehouse?  That’s accurate.  It’s been standard practice for 30 years.  But back in 1977, nobody had thought of that yet.)

Voyager Mission Control used to be a couple of big rooms full of busy people, computers, giant screens.  Now it’s a single room in a small office building in the San Gabriel Valley, in between a dog training school and a McDonalds.  The Mission Control team is a handful of people, none of them young, several well past retirement age. 

And they’re trying to fix the problem.  But right now, it doesn’t look good.  You can’t just download a new OS from 15 billion kilometers away.  (For starters, there isn’t the bandwidth.)  They would have to figure out the problem, figure out if a workaround is possible, and then apply it… all with a round-trip time of 45 hours for every communication with a probe that is flying away from us at a million miles a day.  They’re trying, but nobody likes their odds.

So at some point — not tomorrow, not next week, but at some point in the next few months — they’ll probably have to admit defeat.  And then they’ll declare Voyager 1 officially over, dead and done, the end of a long song.

And that’s all.

«

unique link to this extract

The EU is formalizing rules for taking CO2 out of the atmosphere • The Verge

Justine Calma:

»

The European Council and European Parliament reached a provisional agreement on Tuesday to create the first-of-its-kind certification framework for carbon removal technologies. The new climate tech has yet to prove itself at scale, but the EU is already folding it into its plan to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Net zero implies that the bloc would resort to capturing any remaining CO2 emissions that it hasn’t been able to prevent, either by harnessing the natural ability of plants to absorb carbon dioxide or by building technologies that filter CO2 out of the air or seawater.

There are inherent risks to that net-zero strategy — which is why rules like the ones laid out today are so important. They’ll dictate what counts as carbon removal, hopefully sifting out shoddy projects that don’t meaningfully fight climate change. Lax rules — or no rules at all — could give companies a way to keep polluting while misleadingly promising to draw down those emissions later. If those promises fall through, or the technologies they rely on fail, then it leaves behind all of that pollution that could have been prevented in the first place by opting for clean energy instead of carbon removal.

«

Formalisation is good: there have been plenty of “set-aside” projects which are anything but in reality. Strong certification is really needed.
unique link to this extract

‘Apple Ring’ allegedly in development to rival Samsung Galaxy Ring • MacRumors

Tim Hardwick:

»

Apple has toyed with the idea of a ring wearable for several years, as indicated by several patents, but with Samsung preparing to bring its own product to market, the time could be ripe for Apple to follow it with something that embodies CEO Tim Cook’s mantra, “be best, not first.”

According to the Electronic Times, Apple has been paying close attention to the market for signs that a smart ring would be a popular, less intrusive alternative to a watch, that can be worn for longer and is easier to sleep with.

Apple is said to be seriously weighing up the idea as a viable expansion of its wearables lineup, and has been increasingly applying for patents related to an NFC-enabled finger-worn device as it coordinates the timing of the release.

“It seems likely that commercialization is imminent,” said an industry insider quoted in the machine-translated report.

The rumor comes as Samsung prepares to unveil a Galaxy Ring at its second Galaxy Unpacked 2024 event, which is likely to take place in the second half of July. The Korean firm teased the product’s existence at the end of its first Unpacked event in January, and it is now expected to enter mass production in the second half of the year.

Besides its rumored ability to measure blood flow, the Galaxy Ring is also expected to feature ECG monitoring, sleep tracking, and functionalities for controlling other devices and making wireless payments remotely. The device is expected to come in several sizes.

«

My reading is this is that Samsung really hopes Apple is developing a ring, because that would validate the ring that it is making. In – surprise! – several sizes.
unique link to this extract

Fake funeral live stream scams are all over Facebook • 404 Media

Joseph Cox:

»

Facebook is awash with scams that direct visitors to fake live streams of funeral services, preying on relatives and friends of the deceased when they might be at their most vulnerable, 404 Media has found. The scams involve pulling details of real deceased people from legitimate funeral services pages and then making copycat announcements, before pushing victims to a site that asks for their credit card information allegedly in order to watch the funeral of their loved one.

The scams cause “panic on the day where you shouldn’t be thinking of that,” the cousin of one recently deceased person, whose name and photo were recently used in a scam, told 404 Media. 404 Media is not publishing his name or that of the deceased relative for privacy reasons. The relative described the scam as “disgusting.”

In that specific case, a Facebook account pointed visitors to a tinyurl link. “Please Like,Share Your Family and Friends,” a post on the Facebook account read, next to a photo of the deceased. “You will get the link once the registration is complete.I introduced this rule only for scams.thank you.” 

That link then went to a website claiming to host a livestream of the deceased’s funeral service, complete with a video player that takes a few seconds to load. “WATCH LIVE NOW,” a button underneath the player reads. On other nearly identical scam sites 404 Media found, clicking such a link directs visitors to enter their credit card information, presumably the point at which the scammers extract value from their unsuspecting victims.

«

Facebook has become a place to find all the scammers’ marks in the world in one convenient location.

In passing, 404 Media – set up by journalists laid off by Vice/Motherboard when it hit hard times – gets better and better (because they were and are damn good journalists), and requires email registration on the basis that it lets them stay in touch directly with readers. It’s a smart move, in these times when sites are so plentiful and hard to tell apart.
unique link to this extract

Jezebel’s new owner has a request for advertisers: please stop hurting journalism • Check My Ads

»

Josh Jackson was shocked when he found out what term, if used in the music publication he co-founded, could automatically strip an article of ad revenue.

It was the word “song.”

That was just one of more than 4,000 “negative keywords” a major advertiser looking to run ads on Paste Magazine, Jackson’s website, included in a brand safety spreadsheet it shared with him.

And now that his magazine resurrected the iconic feminist media outlet Jezebel last November, essential journalism going unfunded because of brand safety concerns has become a more urgent issue. Jezebel has even launched a subscription option to help fund its reporting, filling in a revenue gap created by brand safety tech.

“We’ve been doing this a long time, but hadn’t really felt the effects of brand safety until we purchased Jezebel,” Jackson told Check My Ads. “(We) very quickly got into the deep end on everything brand safety related and it’s just been blowing my mind to see.”

Jackson — or anyone who cares about quality journalism — should find this brand safety technology mind-blowing (and not in a good way).

«

Since you wonder: “Check My Ads Institute is an independent watchdog reshaping the digital adtech industry from within its ranks — and building a new sustainable standard in digital advertising.” Interesting lineup of staff and directors, including Jean Donovan, who was recently “let go” from Harvard, allegedly after pressure from Facebook.
unique link to this extract

Walmart acquiring smart TV maker Vizio for $2.3bn to bulk up advertising business • Variety

Todd Spangler:

»

The companies announced Tuesday that they have entered into an agreement for Walmart to acquire Vizio, a leading seller of value-priced TV sets and connected TV ads in the US. The deal would make Walmart a significant player in connected TV advertising, competing with players including Roku, Amazon, Google/YouTube and Samsung Ads.

The combination promises to accelerate Walmart’s US. advertising business, called Walmart Connect, by bringing together Vizio’s advertising business business with Walmart’s reach and resources. Walmart Connect revenue increased 22% year over year for the quarter ended Jan. 31 (but the company did not report dollar figures). Globally, Walmart’s ad revenue grew by 28% to $3.4 billion for its 2024 fiscal year ended in January. According to Walmart, the deal for Vizio also will let the retailer “connect with and serve its customers in new ways” including through “innovative television and in-home entertainment and media experiences.”

“Put simply, the deal would combine an emerging retail media/direct response powerhouse [in Walmart], with [Vizio’s] vertically integrated, connected TV/branding advertising business (including data) to create a full-funnel offering for advertisers,” New Street Research analyst Dan Salmon wrote in a note. For Walmart, the deal “would have the added benefit of creating an offering that is more attractive to non-endemic advertisers (i.e. beyond third-party sellers transacting on Walmart Marketplace)” to those that don’t sell through Walmart but want to reach viewers on Vizio TVs.

The deal is subject to regulatory approvals and other closing conditions. Vizio’s board has unanimously approved the transaction, and shareholders owning 89% of the voting shares in the company have also OK’d the deal. According to Vizio, no other stockholder approval is required to complete the transaction.

Irvine, Calif.-based Vizio was founded in 2002. Today, Vizio counts more than 500 direct advertiser customers, including “many of the Fortune 500.”

«

Advertising! Everyone’s advertising everything to everyone all at once all the time! Advertising! Give me more! (Ignoring Vizio having been successfully sued for unannounced tracking between 2014 and 2017. All in the name of advertising! It was necessary!)
unique link to this extract

Finally, scientists uncover the genetic basis of fingerprints • The Scientist Magazine®

James Gaines:

»

[The] story begins in the outer layer of body tissue, called the epithelium. [At the University of Edinburgh, Denis] Headon’s team ultimately found that fingerprints start out looking very similar to hair follicles: Both begin as small discs of cells on the epithelium, and in both cases, the cells turn on genes for a suite of proteins including EDAR and WNT—which are respectively related to how epithelial cells and cells in general migrate, differentiate, and mature. However, hair follicles go on to recruit cells from layers below the epithelium, forming a deep tube where hair will eventually grow. Slight differences in gene expression prevent this recruitment step from happening in fingerprints.

Those same differences in gene expression also seem to set up a Turing pattern, named for the English mathematician Alan Turing who first hypothesized its existence. Back in 1952, Turing suggested that natural biological patterns like stripes or spots could form in the presence of two molecules: a slow-moving activator and a fast-moving inhibitor. The activator would do three things: 1) tell cells to do something, such as make colored pigment; 2) tell cells to make more activator; and 3) tell cells to start making its inhibitor. Meanwhile, the inhibitor tells the cell to slow down activator production (and thus, ultimately, to make less of itself). This means that the activator and inhibitor are always made in overall proportion to each other, and the whole system can propagate from even a single initiation point.

…Some of the team’s colleagues—Benjamin Walker, Adam Townsend, and Andrew Krause—created an online simulator called VisualPDE where folks can experiment with Turing patterns and initiation sites. VisualPDE’s simulation is not unique to fingerprints but can illustrate how small changes can create unique patterns.

Rasmussen says he’d be interested in seeing if scientists could reprogram the process, creating hair follicles or prints where there had been none before. That’s the hope, Headon says: that somewhere down the road this work could lead to therapies for congenital conditions or medical regeneration.

«

Definitely recommend having a play with VisualPDE. This story came out a year ago, but still fun.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: if there’s ever an independently verified piece of information about Neuralink, rather than tweets from Musk, I’ll link to it.

The possible trajectories of billiards (and snooker and pool) balls has enthralled mathematicians for years. CC-licensed photo by Brian DeMaio on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

There’s another post coming this week at the Social Warming Substack on Friday at 0845 UK time. Free signup.

A selection of 10 links for you. Break! I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. Observations and links welcome.

‘They lied’: plastics producers deceived public about recycling, report reveals • The Guardian

Dharna Noor:

»

The industry has known for decades about these existential challenges, but obscured that information in its marketing campaigns, the report shows.

The research draws on previous investigations as well as newly revealed internal documents illustrating the extent of this decades-long campaign. Industry insiders over the past several decades have variously referred to plastic recycling as “uneconomical”, said it “cannot be considered a permanent solid waste solution”, and said it “cannot go on indefinitely”, the revelations show.

The authors say the evidence demonstrates that oil and petrochemical companies, as well as their trade associations, may have broken laws designed to protect the public from misleading marketing and pollution.

In the 1950s, plastic producers came up with an idea to ensure a continually growing market for their products: disposability. “They knew if they focused on single-use [plastics] people would buy and buy and buy,” said Davis Allen, investigative researcher at the CCI and the report’s lead author. At a 1956 industry conference, the Society of the Plastics Industry, a trade group, told producers to focus on “low cost, big volume” and “expendability” and to aim for materials to end up “in the garbage wagon”.

The Society of Plastics is now known as the Plastics Industry Association. “As is typical, instead of working together towards actual solutions to address plastic waste, groups like CCI choose to level political attacks instead of constructive solutions,” Matt Seaholm, president and CEO of the trade group, said in an emailed response to the report.

Over the following decades, the industry told the public that plastics can easily be tossed into landfills or burned in garbage incinerators. But in the 1980s, as municipalities began considering bans on grocery bags and other plastic products, the industry began promoting a new solution: recycling.

The industry has long known that plastics recycling is not economically or practically viable, the report shows. An internal 1986 report from the trade association the Vinyl Institute noted that “recycling cannot be considered a permanent solid waste solution [to plastics], as it merely prolongs the time until an item is disposed of”.

«

Not really the message you want to get ahead of sorting the bins for recycling now is it.
unique link to this extract

EU accuses TikTok of failing to stop kids pretending to be adults • Ars Technica

Ashley Belanger:

»

The European Commission (EC) is concerned that TikTok isn’t doing enough to protect kids, alleging that the short-video app may be sending kids down rabbit holes of harmful content while making it easy for kids to pretend to be adults and avoid the protective content filters that do exist.

The allegations came Monday when the EC announced a formal investigation into how TikTok may be breaching the Digital Services Act (DSA) “in areas linked to the protection of minors, advertising transparency, data access for researchers, as well as the risk management of addictive design and harmful content.”

“We must spare no effort to protect our children,” Thierry Breton, European Commissioner for Internal Market, said in the press release, reiterating that the “protection of minors is a top enforcement priority for the DSA.”

This makes TikTok the second platform investigated for possible DSA breaches after X (aka Twitter) came under fire last December. Both are being scrutinized after submitting transparency reports in September that the EC said failed to satisfy the DSA’s strict standards on predictable things like not providing enough advertising transparency or data access for researchers.

But while X is additionally being investigated over alleged dark patterns and disinformation—following accusations last October that X wasn’t stopping the spread of Israel/Hamas disinformation—it’s TikTok’s young user base that appears to be the focus of the EC’s probe into its platform.

…Likely over the coming months, the EC will request more information from TikTok, picking apart its DSA transparency report. The probe could require interviews with TikTok staff or inspections of TikTok’s offices.

«

Once the EU gets its teeth into you, it really bites.
unique link to this extract

The epidemic of fraudulent DMCA takedowns • Tax Policy

Dan Neidle:

»

I wrote recently about a fraudulent attempt to use US copyright law to take down an article I’d written which was critical of a fake PR firm, “Mogul Press”. I was shocked to see how they did this: they copied my text into a fake website, then filed a takedown notice at Google claiming my article had copied theirs.

The notice was sent by “LMG Media Group” in the UAE. I don’t believe it exists – but Google rather brilliantly accepts takedown notices without checking if the person filing it exists.

Another identical notice was sent by “Lamar Media Corporation” in the US, which also doesn’t appear to exist. The intended effect is to remove my article from Google searches. Note the unusual wording of the two notices [pictured in the article]: “completely infringing” (which reads like someone without legal training trying to sound like a lawyer).

I wondered if there had been any other similar takedowns, and so searched for other occurrences of that unusual phrase. This search of the Lumen database finds 180 just from “Media Corporation” entities. Each one has identical text, and is sent by a fake company whose name appears to have been randomly generated. Forbidden Stories and rest of world published investigations into Eliminalia, a Spanish company that monetised this practice at scale, using the exact same technique of creating backdated copies and then fraudulently claiming the copy is the original. And Mashable reported on another fraudulent takedown attempt in 2022.

I don’t know if what I’m seeing is Eliminalia, or someone else with a similar business model who was hired by Mogul Press.

There’s this, trying to take down a report of a solicitor failing to appeal a striking-off [graphic in article]. And this, trying to take down another report of that same event [ditto].

With a duplicate from another made-up company (“Ventuky Media Corporation”), and another from “Bryan Media Corporation”, and another from “Yan Media Corporation”, and another from “Richards Media Corporation”, and another from “Venkata Media Corporation”. There are many more.

The fraudulent companies set up automated systems that can file zillions of complaints instantly. The victim, however, is unlikely to have any automated way to file counter-notices… they’ll have to do so individually. It’s also widely believed that the more reports Google receives, the greater the chance it downgrades the target website in its ranking.

«

As he points out, this would be quite easy to prevent if Google were to demand more information about the claimant, including some sort of proof of ID and/or IP ownership, and also some sort of payment (in escrow if necessary, with false claims forfeited).
unique link to this extract

Ozempic is taking off with the world’s largest obese population. (It isn’t the US) • WSJ

Dave Sebastian:

»

China has more obese people than anywhere else in the world, and they are increasingly turning to weight-loss drugs to solve the problem.

That is fueling a gray market of drug sellers and buyers, who have little trouble getting around China’s rules on the use of Ozempic. 

Ozempic isn’t available for weight loss in the country, instead being reserved for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes. But users on e-commerce platforms are able to buy the shots, colloquially known as “miracle drugs,” simply by declaring they have been diagnosed with diabetes—without providing proof. 

They aren’t getting a bad deal. On JD.com, a dosage of Ozempic retails for around $139. That is higher than its cost on the country’s national-insurance plan but much cheaper than the $970 some users pay in the US each month. JD.com didn’t respond to requests for comment.

The gray market for Ozempic highlights a conundrum facing China’s government: how to tackle the world’s biggest obesity problem. 

There are about 200 million obese adults in China, and an additional 400 million who are overweight, according to estimates by Jefferies based on official data. China will have another 100 million people with obesity in just over a decade, the investment banking firm predicts, despite the country’s declining population.

«

unique link to this extract

After years of avoiding extradition, Julian Assange’s appeal is likely his last chance. Here’s how it might unfold (and how we got here) • The Conversation

Holly Cullen is an adjunct professor at the University of Western Australia:

»

On February 20 and 21, Julian Assange will ask the High Court of England and Wales to reverse a decision from June last year allowing the United Kingdom to extradite him to the United States.

There he faces multiple counts of computer misuse and espionage stemming from his work with WikiLeaks, publishing sensitive US government documents provided by Chelsea Manning. The US government has repeatedly claimed that Assange’s actions risked its national security.

This is the final avenue of appeal in the UK, although Stella Assange, Julian’s wife, has indicated he would seek an order from the European Court of Human Rights if he loses the application for appeal. The European Court, an international court that hears cases under the European Convention on Human Rights, can issue orders that are binding on convention member states. In 2022, an order from the court stopped the UK sending asylum seekers to Rwanda pending a full review of the relevant legislation.

The extradition process has been running for nearly five years. Over such a long time, it’s easy to lose track of the sequence of events that led to this. Here’s how we got here, and what might happen next.

«

His best chance is if his defence can successfully argue that the US is, in effect, not a safe place to which to extradite somebody.
unique link to this extract

How Google is killing independent sites like ours • HouseFresh

Gisele Navarro and Dany Ashton:

»

Google regularly launches updates to its algorithm to continuously improve search results quality. Think of these updates as a refresh of the system where rankings change: some websites see an improvement while others see a decline.

At HouseFresh, we keep an eye on Google’s news and documentation because these updates can literally make or break our website. That said, we don’t write for Google’s robots and always make editorial decisions with our readers in mind.

We know that at the end of the day, Google will reward us if our readers find our articles useful. Or that’s what we thought.

You might have noticed that no matter what you google, there’s always a selection of the same publishers showing up at the top of the results. What do BuzzFeed, Rolling Stone, Forbes, Popular Science, and Better Homes & Gardens have in common? 

They all know which are the best air purifiers for pet hair. Another thing they’ve got in common is that they all also seem to know the best cooling sheets for hot sleepers.

You could play this game yourself. Other searches you could try are: best gifts for mom, best home saunas, best beard products, best gifts for teens, best cocktail kits… the list goes on.

The problem is, for the most part, these publishers recommend products without firsthand testing and simply paraphrase marketing materials and Amazon listing information.

In the last year, we have waited patiently for the many, many, MANY Google algorithm updates to impact these results. 

We were hopeful when Google introduced its reviews system with the Products Review Update back in 2021. It seemed they were finally doing something about one of the worst aspects of the modern internet: searching for information about products only to have to wade through countless reviews from people who had never even seen the thing.

«

Well, ’twas ever thus. The big publications would “review” things and get the attention; smaller outlets would struggle to get noticed.
unique link to this extract

Subprime intelligence • Where’s Your Ed At

Ed Zitron:

»

These models are not saying “I shall now draw a monkey,” they are saying “I have been asked for something called a monkey, I will now draw on my dataset to generate what is most likely a monkey.” These things are not “learning,” or “understanding,” or even “intelligent” — they’re giant math machines that, while impressive at first, can never assail the limits of a technology that doesn’t actually know anything. 

Despite what fantasists may tell you, these are not “kinks” to work out of artificial intelligence models — these are the hard limits, the restraints that come when you try to mimic knowledge with mathematics. You cannot “fix” hallucinations (the times when a model authoritatively tells you something that isn’t true, or creates a picture of something that isn’t right), because these models are predicting things based off of tags in a dataset, which it might be able to do well but can never do so flawlessly or reliably.

…I believe artificial intelligence companies deeply underestimate how perfect the things around us are, and how deeply we base our understanding and acceptance of the world on knowledge and context. People generally have four fingers and a thumb on each hand, hammers have a handle made of wood and a head made of metal, and monkeys have two legs and two arms. The text on the sign of a store generally has a name and a series of words that describe it, or perhaps its address and phone number.

…there are no essential artificial intelligence use cases, and no killer apps outside of non-generative assistants like Alexa that are now having generative AI forced into them for no apparent reason. I consider myself relatively tuned into the tech ecosystem, and I read every single tech publication regularly, yet I’m struggling to point to anything that generative AI has done other than reignite the flames of venture capital. There are cool little app integrations, interesting things like live translation in Samsung devices, but these are features, not applications. And if there are true industry-changing possibilities waiting for us on the other side, I am yet to hear them outside of the fan fiction of Silicon Valley hucksters.

This entire hype cycle feels specious, though not quite as specious as the metaverse or cryptocurrency boom.

«

unique link to this extract

The mysterious math of billiards tables • Quanta Magazine

David Richeson:

»

In Disney’s 1959 film Donald in Mathmagic Land, Donald Duck, inspired by the narrator’s descriptions of the geometry of billiards, energetically strikes the cue ball, sending it ricocheting around the table before it finally hits the intended balls. Donald asks, “How do you like that for mathematics?”

Because rectangular billiard tables have four walls meeting at right angles, billiard trajectories like Donald’s are predictable and well understood — even if they’re difficult to carry out in practice. However, research mathematicians still cannot answer basic questions about the possible trajectories of billiard balls on tables in the shape of other polygons (shapes with flat sides). Even triangles, the simplest of polygons, still hold mysteries.

«

Of course mathematicians are not satisfied with rectangular billiard tables, so they extend the question of “where will the ball go?” to tables of any and all shapes. But not for nothing is the World Snooker Finals known by many as the Geometry Championships.
unique link to this extract

‘Not letting me on Snapchat was the best thing my mum ever did for me’: how to talk to your kids about social media • The Guardian

Annalisa Barbieri:

»

“People do not communicate with authenticity and vulnerability on social media,” explains the ACP registered child and adolescent psychotherapist Ryan Lowe. “As a result, young people have really contorted pictures of what the lives of others are like. Lives on social media are always either exaggeratedly wonderful or exaggeratedly awful, traumatic and extreme. This leaves them trying to form an identity in a hall of mirrors with all the reflections of themselves and others being completely distorted. It takes a strong adolescent to be able to filter the noise of social media out and find an authentic way of developing.”

The specialists also taught me how important it was to model the sort of behaviour you want back from your children. In other words: do as I do, not as I say.

Everything in our house is a discussion. (“My advice,” Prof Peter Fonagy, CEO of the Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, once told me, “is to reach a reasoned democratic agreement with your child, in discussion with them.”)

I would never ask my children to do anything I wasn’t prepared to do myself (with some exceptions). I would always ask for their consent, where appropriate, from when they were small (eg: “Can I use your colouring pens?”; “Can I get you undressed for a bath?”), and – crucially – I’d listen to them if they said no. And I would never say no for the sake of it just because I was the adult. I would give reasons. But – and this is important – their father and I have always been the adults. Sure, they could negotiate, but someone had to take final responsibility, and that person, where social media was concerned, was me. (Their father, my partner, didn’t want her to have social media either, but wasn’t sure how to navigate these tricky waters.)

«

Annalisa really is one of the smartest people around – as much as anything because she is so good at listening to what people are saying, and not forcing her ideas on others.
unique link to this extract

Science journal published ‘ridiculous’ graphic of rat with big penis after asking AI for a picture • Daily Telegraph

Sarah Knapton:

»

It might be considered an AI cock-up on a massive scale.

A scientific paper purporting to show the signalling pathway of sperm stem cells has met with widespread ridicule after it depicted a rodent with an anatomically eye-watering appendage and four giant testicles.

The creature, labelled “rat”, was also sitting upright in the manner of a squirrel, while the graphic was littered with nonsensical words such as “dissilced”, “testtomcels” and “senctolic”.

A cut-away image showed “sterrn cells” in a Petri dish being picked up with a spoon.

It appeared in the journal Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology this week alongside several other absurd graphics that had been generated by the AI tool Midjourney.

They included a multicoloured JAK-STAT signalling pathway diagram which experts likened to “some crazy level of Candy Crush” and said was not grounded in “any known biology”.

The paper, written by researchers at the Honghui Hospital in China, has since been retracted by the journal, which issued an apology and said it was working to “correct the record”.

«

How, you might wonder, could any journal possibly pass such work for publication? Because Frontiers, where it appeared, is a pay-for-publication journal. The illustration really have to be seen to be believed, though.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Introducing AI systems for tennis line calling has had unexpected effects on umpires’ tendency to wrongly call serves out. CC-licensed photo by Brianna Laugher on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 9 links for you. New calls please. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. Observations and links welcome.

Air Canada told it is responsible for errors by its website chatbot • Vancouver Sun

Susan Lazaruk:

»

An Air Canada passenger from B.C. [British Columbia] has won his fight after the airline refused him a retroactive discount, claiming it wasn’t responsible for promising the refund because it was made in error by the airline’s online chatbot.

Artificial intelligence law experts say it’s a sign of disputes to come if companies don’t ensure accuracy when increasingly relying on artificial intelligence to deal with customers.

Jake Moffatt booked a flight to Toronto with Air Canada to attend his grandmother’s funeral in 2022 using the website’s chatbot, which advised him he could pay full fare and apply for a bereavement fare later, according to the decision by B.C. civil resolution tribunal.

But an Air Canada employee later told him that he couldn’t apply for the discount after the flight.

“Air Canada says it cannot be held liable for the information provided by the chatbot,” said tribunal member Christopher Rivers in his written reasons for decision posted online. It “suggests the chatbot is a separate legal entity that is responsible for its own actions,” he said Rivers. “This is a remarkable submission.”

When Moffatt asked Air Canada’s automated response system about reduced fares for those travelling because of a death in the immediate family, the chatbot answered he should submit his claim within 90 days to get a refund.

His total fare for the return trip was $1,640, and he was told the bereavement fare would be about $760 in total, a $880 difference, he told the tribunal. He later submitted a request for the partial refund and included a screenshot of the chatbot conversation, the tribunal said.

…The airline argued it could not be held liable for information provided by one of its agents, servants or representatives, including a chatbot, Rivers said, adding it didn’t say why it believed that.

«

As someone pointed out on Twitter: the point at which personhood is claimed for an AI isn’t when it’s conscious, it’s when an airline needs to get out of paying a refund.
unique link to this extract

The effect of front-end vehicle height on pedestrian death risk • ScienceDirect

Justin Tyndall is at the University of Hawaii department of economics:

»

Pedestrian deaths in the US have risen in recent years. Concurrently, US vehicles have increased in size, which may pose a safety risk for pedestrians. In particular, the increased height of vehicle front-ends may present a danger for pedestrians in a crash, as the point of vehicle contact is more likely to occur at the pedestrian’s chest or head.

I merge US crash data with a public data set on vehicle dimensions to test for the impact of vehicle height on the likelihood that a struck pedestrian dies. After controlling for crash characteristics, I estimate a 10 cm increase in the vehicle’s front-end height is associated with a 22% increase in fatality risk. I estimate that a cap on front-end vehicle heights of 1.25 m would reduce annual US pedestrian deaths by 509.

«

Reminds me strongly of the UK’s (and Europe’s) efforts to limit the use of bull bars on the front of cars because they caused extra fatalities and worsened injuries. The Independent campaigned very hard on this in the late 1990s, with some success. Lives were saved.
unique link to this extract

EU to hit Apple with first ever fine in €500m music streaming penalty • Financial Times

Javier Espinoza:

»

Brussels is to impose its first ever fine on tech giant Apple for allegedly breaking EU law over access to its music streaming services, according to five people with direct knowledge of the long-running investigation.

The fine, which is in the region of €500m and is expected to be announced early next month, is the culmination of a European Commission antitrust probe into whether Apple has used its own platform to favour its services over those of competitors.

The probe is investigating whether Apple blocked apps from informing iPhone users of cheaper alternatives to access music subscriptions outside the App Store. It was launched after music-streaming app Spotify made a formal complaint to regulators in 2019.

The Commission will say Apple’s actions are illegal and go against the bloc’s rules that enforce competition in the single market, the people familiar with the case told the Financial Times. It will ban Apple’s practice of blocking music services from letting users outside its App Store switch to cheaper alternatives.

Brussels will accuse Apple of abusing its powerful position and imposing anti-competitive trading practices on rivals, the people said, adding that the EU would say the tech giant’s terms were “unfair trading conditions”.

It is one of the most significant financial penalties levied by the EU on big tech companies. A series of fines against Google levied over several years and amounting to about €8bn are being contested in court.

«

True, it’s the first fine from the EU on antitrust, but back in 2011/2012 Apple was in hot water with the EU antitrust group over cartel pricing of its iBooks. That was settled by letting Amazon sell at the cartel prices for two years.
unique link to this extract

What tennis reveals about AI’s impact on human behaviour • The Economist

»

Car drivers, financial traders and air-traffic controllers already routinely see their decisions overruled by AI systems put in place to rapidly correct poor judgment. Doctors, judges and even soldiers could be next.

Much of this correction happens out of the public eye, thwarting would-be analysts. But, says [behavioural economist at Northwestern University, David] Almog, “tennis is one of the most visible settings where final decision rights are granted to AI.” That is why, together with colleagues in America and Australia, he has looked at whether tennis umpires and line judges correctly called balls in or out during nearly 100,000 points played in some 700 matches across the world, both before and after the introduction of the Hawk-Eye ball-tracking system in 2006.

The Hawk-Eye system, now used at most elite tournaments, uses between six and ten cameras positioned around the court to create a three-dimensional representation of the ball’s trajectory. This can then be presented on a screen visible to players, spectators and officials—as well as TV viewers. Players can use it to appeal human decisions, with the AI’s verdict considered final. Bad calls from line judges and umpires are now often overturned.

The latest analysis from Mr Almog and his colleagues, published as a preprint last month, showed that Hawk-Eye oversight has prompted human officials to up their game and make 8% less mistakes than before it was introduced. …But when the researchers looked at serves in particular, and especially in cases where the served ball landed within 20mm either side of a line, they were surprised to see the error rate soar. The umpires and line judges, it turned out, had switched strategy. Before Hawk-Eye, they were more likely to call a serve out when it was in. But afterwards, they were even more likely to wave through balls that were actually out.

«

Because, Almog suggests, umpires want to avoid being shown – on a giant screen! – to have interrupted the point wrongly. (He didn’t actually talk to the umpires, but any change would have been unconscious.)

The article makes more general points about humans v AI – but now, bigger tournaments have ELC (electronic line calling) where there isn’t any review: the machines call it, and that’s that.
unique link to this extract

Switzerland proposes an UN expert group on solar geoengineering • Climate Change News

Matteo Civillini:

»

Switzerland wants to advance global talks on whether controversial solar geoengineering techniques should be used to compensate for climate change by cooling down the earth.

It is proposing to create the first United Nations expert group to “examine risks and opportunities” of solar radiation management (SRM), a suite of largely untested technologies aimed at dimming the sun.

The panel would be made up of experts appointed by member states of the UN’s environment programme (Unep) and representatives of international scientific bodies, according to a draft resolution submitted by Switzerland and seen by Climate Home.

Governments will negotiate and vote on the proposal at Unep’s meeting due to start at the end of February in Nairobi, Kenya. It has been formally endorsed by Senegal, Georgia, Monaco and Guinea.

A Swiss government spokesperson told Climate Home that SRM is “a new topic on the political agenda” and Switzerland is “committed to ensuring that states are informed about these technologies, in particular about possible risks and cross-border effects”.

Solar geoengineering is a deeply contested topic and scientists are divided over whether it should be explored at all as a potential solution.

Ines Camilloni, a climatology professor at the University of Buenos Aires, welcomed Switzerland’s proposal, saying the UN “is in a good position to facilitate equitable, transparent, and inclusive discussions”.

«

As I previously said: first it’s tried by small groups, then it gets government money, then someone ridiculously rich goes and does it on their own. Examples: aircraft, cars, rockets.
unique link to this extract

AI and Japan as a safe space • Pure Invention

Matt Alt:

»

OpenAI chose to give their new system a Japanese name. Sora means “sky” in Japanese. Its creators chose it, they told the New York Times, because it “evokes the idea of limitless creative potential.”

Limitless it may be, but many of the videos OpenAI released to demonstrate the technology are steeped the imagery of one country, and that’s Japan. The Twitter announcement showcases a drone-like shot of a Tokyo street. Other samples included a night scene in Shibuya (linked to at the top of this post), a scene of rooftops speeding by the window of a Japanese commuter train, and a cute character raking stones in a Zen rock garden. The Sora website is topped by a video of origami birds nesting in a tree.

At first glance the videos impress. But similar to the case of the AI kimono I wrote about last year, those who know Japan will find themselves quickly sliding into the uncanny valley of gibberish street signs and snow on the ground in cherry blossom season and all of the other assorted janky weirdness that comes with generative AI. That weirdness isn’t a bug, but a sort of feature. Because this isn’t really Japan dreamed by a machine — it’s Japan dreamed by a machine that’s been trained on foreign fantasies of Japan. (The baked-in Orientalism of American AI is one of many reasons domestic Japanese startups are scrambling to conjure up their own.)

Far more interesting is the question of why OpenAI chose so many Japanese things (or more precisely, Japanese seeming things) to introduce Sora to the world.

…“Made in Japan” was a joke in the immediate postwar era, and then something akin to a threat in the Eighties. Today it is a badge of authenticity, deployed anywhere status needs to be conferred to a quotidian item: Japanese denim, Japanese whiskey, Japanese cleaning magic, Japanese Breakfast (okay, so that last one’s an indie-pop band.)

Japan may not confer any cool factor in the AI sphere, but it possesses undeniable cool factor in the real world. It’s also safe, in all senses of the word. It’s seen as free from crime and societal strife. It isn’t percieved as a threat, or even involved in touchy geopolitical issues.

«

unique link to this extract

The majority of traffic from Elon Musk’s X may have been fake during the Super Bowl, report suggests • Mashable

Matt Binder:

»

Super Bowl 2024 shattered records, with the NFL championship broadcast on CBS becoming the most-watched televised event in US history.

Also riding high from the big game? Elon Musk’s X. The company formerly known as Twitter published its own press release, lauding Super Bowl LVIII as one of the biggest events ever on the social media platform with more than 10 billion impressions and over 1 billion video views.

However, it appears that a significant portion of that traffic on X could be fake, according to data provided to Mashable by CHEQ, a leading cybersecurity firm that tracks bots and fake users.

According to CHEQ, a whopping 75.85% of traffic from X to its advertising clients’ websites during the weekend of the Super Bowl was fake.

“I’ve never seen anything even remotely close to 50 percent, not to mention 76 percent,” CHEQ founder and CEO Guy Tytunovich told Mashable regarding X’s fake traffic data. “I’m amazed…I’ve never, ever, ever, ever seen anything even remotely close.”

CHEQ’s data for this report is based on 144,000 visits to its clients’ sites that came from X during Super Bowl weekend, from Friday, Feb. 9 up until the end of Super Bowl Sunday on Feb. 11. The data was collected from across CHEQ’s 15,000 total clients. It’s a small portion of the relevant data, and it’s not scientifically sampled, but it nonetheless suggests a dramatic trend.

CHEQ monitors bots and fake users across the internet in order to minimize online ad fraud for its clients. Tytunovich’s company accomplishes this by tracking how visitors from different sources, such as X, interact with a client’s page after they click one of their links. The company can also tell when a bot is passing itself off as a real user, such as when a fraudulent user is faking what type of operating system they are using to view a website.

«

Just as relevant is that the proportion of bot traffic from other platforms, such as Facebook and TikTok, is in the low single digits. Seems Elon hasn’t got a handle on the bot problem at all. As any eX-Twitter user could tell you.
unique link to this extract

Zero plans for public onshore windfarms submitted last year in England • The Guardian

Fiona Harvey:

»

No new proposals for general-use windfarms were submitted for planning permission in England last year, despite the government’s much-vaunted relaxation of planning restrictions.

Only seven applications were submitted for onshore wind turbines for the whole of 2023 in England, new data from the government has shown, and all of those developments were for the replacement of existing turbines or for private sites, where the energy produced is destined for a particular consumer, such as a business.

The number was even lower than the 10 applications submitted in 2022, when the de facto ban was still in force.

Four onshore wind developments were granted planning permission in England last year from prior applications, all of which were either turbine replacements or for private use, and work began on one 4MW project in Leighton Buzzard in Bedfordshire, which had received permission the year before.

Last September, ministers announced changes to the restrictive regulations that had in effect ruled out onshore wind turbine construction in England since 2015, brought in by David Cameron to appease rightwing Conservatives.

Rishi Sunak agreed to amend the regulations last year under pressure from his backbenchers who were concerned about the impact of the ban on energy prices. But campaigners pointed out that the relaxation of the ban was only partial, and warned it was likely to be ineffective.

«

And lo, the campaigners were correct. How unsurprising.
unique link to this extract

Welding method drastically cuts time to make mini nuclear reactors • The Times

Emma Powell:

»

One of Britain’s oldest steelmakers has developed a manufacturing technique that it claims could drastically reduce the time and cost to produce small modular reactor (SMR) nuclear power stations, which have been proposed as one way to bridge the nation’s energy gap.

Sheffield Forgemasters has become the first to use the so-called electron beam welding method to produce one of the core parts of a small modular reactor (SMR) at scale.

Nuclear pressure vessels are thick steel containers that hold nuclear fuel when the reactors operate and provide one of several barriers that keep radioactive material out of the environment.

Electron beam welding works by firing electrons at an extremely high speed to join two pieces of metal together. The main difference to traditional welding methods is that no third-party material is introduced to make the join.

Using traditional techniques, the welding process alone can take at least 120 to 150 days. This new method can reduce the time to about two hours, according to Jesus Talamantes-Silva, director of research at Sheffield Forgemasters, drastically accelerating the manufacturing of SMRs. “That’s how disruptive this technology is,” he said.

The technique is already being used in the automotive and aerospace industries to produce smaller, relatively low-value components. Forgemasters is the first to use the welding technology to build a full-scale SMR pressure vessel, which weighs about 57 tonnes, has a diameter of three metres and walls with a thickness of 200 millimetres.

Unlike conventional plants, SMRs can be factory built. The government wants to open up far more areas as potential sites, replacing rules that allow nuclear power stations only in eight named locations, as it attempts to reach a target of 24 gigawatts of nuclear capacity by 2050, from 6GW at present.

«

If only there were a similar way to speed up the approval process by the same proportion.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

A new bill in California bans “hidden fees” that are added when a bill is totalled. So upfront prices will rise, unsurprisingly. CC-licensed photo by Christian Newton on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

It’s Friday, so there’s another post due at the Social Warming Substack at about 0845 UK time. It’s about AI and jobs.

A selection of 10 links for you. Use them wisely. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. Observations and links welcome.

OpenAI introduces Sora, its text-to-video AI model • The Verge

Emma Roth:

»

OpenAI is launching a new video-generation model, and it’s called Sora. The AI company says Sora “can create realistic and imaginative scenes from text instructions.” The text-to-video model allows users to create photorealistic videos up to a minute long — all based on prompts they’ve written.

Sora is capable of creating “complex scenes with multiple characters, specific types of motion, and accurate details of the subject and background,” according to OpenAI’s introductory blog post. The company also notes that the model can understand how objects “exist in the physical world,” as well as “accurately interpret props and generate compelling characters that express vibrant emotions.”

Prompt: A stylish woman walks down a Tokyo street filled with warm glowing neon and animated city signage. She wears a black leather jacket, a long red dress, and black boots, and carries a black purse. She wears sunglasses and red lipstick. She walks confidently and casually. The street is damp and reflective, creating a mirror effect of the colorful lights. Many pedestrians walk about.

The model can also generate a video based on a still image, as well as fill in missing frames on an existing video or extend it. The Sora-generated demos included in OpenAI’s blog post include an aerial scene of California during the gold rush, a video that looks as if it were shot from the inside of a Tokyo train, and others. Many have some telltale signs of AI — like a suspiciously moving floor in a video of a museum — and OpenAI says the model “may struggle with accurately simulating the physics of a complex scene,” but the results are overall pretty impressive.

«

This is really amazing. Sam Altman was accepting suggestions on eX-Twitter, and then returning the outputs. Also amazing.
unique link to this extract

How I fell for an Amazon scam call and handed over $50,000 • The Cut

Charlotte Cowles:

»

On a Tuesday evening this past October, I put $50,000 in cash in a shoe box, taped it shut as instructed, and carried it to the sidewalk in front of my apartment, my phone clasped to my ear. “Don’t let anyone hurt me,” I told the man on the line, feeling pathetic.

“You won’t be hurt,” he answered. “Just keep doing exactly as I say.”

Three minutes later, a white Mercedes SUV pulled up to the curb. “The back window will open,” said the man on the phone. “Do not look at the driver or talk to him. Put the box through the window, say ‘thank you,’ and go back inside.”

The man on the phone knew my home address, my Social Security number, the names of my family members, and that my 2-year-old son was playing in our living room. He told me my home was being watched, my laptop had been hacked, and we were in imminent danger. “I can help you, but only if you cooperate,” he said. His first orders: I could not tell anyone about our conversation, not even my spouse, or talk to the police or a lawyer.

Now I know this was all a scam — a cruel and violating one but painfully obvious in retrospect. Here’s what I can’t figure out: Why didn’t I just hang up and call 911? Why didn’t I text my husband, or my brother (a lawyer), or my best friend (also a lawyer), or my parents, or one of the many other people who would have helped me? Why did I hand over all that money — the contents of my savings account, strictly for emergencies — without a bigger fight?

«

Yes, it was a big fat scam. Also: Cowles is the personal finance columnist for NY Mag. Somehow I’m not sure I would follow her personal finance advice that closely after this.
unique link to this extract

Apple confirms iOS 17.4 removes Home Screen web apps in the EU: here’s why • 9to5Mac

Chance Miller:

»

Last week, iPhone users in the European Union noticed that they were no longer able to install and run web apps on their iPhone’s Home Screen in iOS 17.4. Apple has added a number of features over the years to improve support for progressive web apps on iPhone. For example, iOS 16.4 allowed PWAs to deliver push notifications with icon badges.

One change in iOS 17.4 is that the iPhone now supports alternative browser engines in the EU. This allows companies to build browsers that don’t use Apple’s WebKit engine for the first time. Apple says that this change, required by the Digital Markets Act, is why it has been forced to remove Home Screen web apps support in the European Union.

Apple explains that it would have to build an “entirely new integration architecture that does not currently exist in iOS” to address the “complex security and privacy concerns associated with web apps using alternative browser engines.”

This work “was not practical to undertake given the other demands of the DMA and the very low user adoption of Home Screen web apps,” Apple explains. “And so, to comply with the DMA’s requirements, we had to remove the Home Screen web apps feature in the EU.”

«

All the EU’s fault. Well of course it is.
unique link to this extract

The puzzling testimony of Craig Wright, self-styled inventor of bitcoin • WIRED

Condé Nast:

»

Among various acts of alleged forgery, [opposing barrister Jonathan] Hough charged that [Craig] Wright backdated documents to make them seem like precursors to the original 2008 Bitcoin white paper; manipulated email communications in support of his claim to be Nakamoto; inserted material post-factum into his academic papers to imply he conceived of Bitcoin long before its release; and used ChatGPT to help create additional forgeries after experts cast doubt over existing materials. The specific discrepancies identified by Hough included anachronistic use of fonts, metadata that implied computer clocks had been manipulated, internal time stamps that contradicted the outward-facing dating of documents, and more.

Hough gave the appearance of trying to construct an exhaustive catalog of discrete pieces of evidence that, combined, painted a picture of fraud “on an industrial scale,” as he put it in his opening arguments.

In some respects, the cross-examination process was less about Wright’s responses, says Lindsay Gledhill, IP partner at law firm Harper James, and more about the performance of Hough. It was “about the barrister’s grinding, relentless list of detail on detail,” she says.

For every anomaly presented by [opposing client] COPA, Wright supplied an explanation. He claimed, variously, that a printing error had caused a misalignment of pixels that gave the appearance of tampering; the complexity of the IT systems used in the editing and storage of documents was not reflected in the testing conducted by the experts; and that his documents may have been altered by staff members in whose custody they had been left. In instances where Wright agreed that a document was inauthentic, he said he had fallen victim to cybersecurity breaches, had never intended to rely on them to support his claim, or implied that documents had been planted by adversaries to undermine him.

«

The trial continues: there are two weeks more of evidence. It’s a judge, not a jury trial.
unique link to this extract

A new law banning ‘hidden fees’ takes aim at restaurant service charges • Los Angeles Times

Stephanie Breijo:

»

On July 1, Senate Bill 478, which Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law in October, is set to prohibit “junk fees” across a wide swath of businesses, including online ticket sales, hotels, restaurants, bars and delivery apps.

Sens. Bill Dodd (D-Napa) and Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley), who co-wrote the bill, say it will offer greater protections for consumers.

“These deceptive fees prevent us from knowing how much we will be charged at the outset,” Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta, who co-sponsored the measure, said in a statement the day it was signed. “They are bad for consumers and bad for competition. … With the signing of SB478, California now has the most effective piece of legislation in the nation to tackle this problem. The price Californians see will be the price they pay.”

Many owners of restaurants and bars rely on now-ubiquitous surcharges to offer employee benefits such as healthcare and higher wages and often note surcharges on menus; some are listed as “elective,” left to the discretion of the diner. As implementation of the law looms, some now say the consequences could be disastrous and “upend” the industry.

The restaurants will need to factor surcharge fees into menu prices, as opposed to simply advertising them at the end of a bill, state officials said.

“At this point, we are going to have to raise our prices a big chunk,” said James Beard Award-winning restaurateur Caroline Styne, co-owner and wine director of the Lucques Group of restaurants and wine director of Hollywood Bowl Food & Wine.

For instance, the famous Ode to Zuni roast chicken with fennel panzanella at A.O.C. is currently priced at $39 and will likely rise to $49 once the law goes into effect, she said.

«

The prices aren’t changing though, are they? It’s just that the charges aren’t being hidden until people come to pay.
unique link to this extract

Pakistani content moderators are exhausted and stuck • Rest of World

Zuha Siddiqui:

»

It was August 2020, Pakistan was under a Covid-19 lockdown, and Asif, who had just graduated with a master’s degree in project management, was struggling to find a job. At the same time, Chinese video-sharing apps like TikTok and Bigo Live were desperately scouting for content moderators in Pakistan. The platforms wanted to hire locally to appease the government, which had accused them of circulating “obscene” and “unlawful” content.

Through LinkedIn, Asif landed a job as a content moderator at Bigo Live. “I didn’t think much of it at the time, because I just wanted a job,” he told Rest of World, requesting a pseudonym because he feared reprisal for breaking a nondisclosure agreement with his employer.

But the stopgap job has now become his career — one he never wanted, and which he is unable to exit despite attempts.

“Everyone who works in this field is there because they have no choice. It’s something you end up in, and then you are just stuck,” said Asif, who moved to Malaysia in April 2023 to work at Accenture, TikTok’s content moderation contractor in South Asia. “No one wants to be a content moderator forever.”

Over a dozen Pakistani professionals who worked in content moderation jobs as a temporary resort due to a lack of employment options told Rest of World they were stuck in a career that was unfulfilling — one that felt like working at a “sweatshop,” because their experience was not transferable. They have degrees in project management, environmental science, engineering, and business administration, and believe that working as content moderators has stunted their careers. 

«

The most thankless job; the dead-end career. And no matter how good AI gets, it’s impossible to see it completely wiping out the need for humans to make these decisions.
unique link to this extract

Zoe Schiffer’s ‘Extremely Hardcore’ shows how Elon Musk broke Twitter • The Washington Post

Quinta Jurecic:

»

Musk’s gravitational self-regard tends to collapse all reporting on him into a character study of his whims. Schiffer does her best to escape that orbit, focusing instead on the experiences of the Twitter employees whose lives were almost unilaterally upended by the takeover. Musk is, quite simply, a terrible boss. He makes unreasonable demands, refuses to listen to advice and puts his current and former employees in danger with alarming regularity by unleashing armies of his followers to harass those who cross him. In perhaps the best-known instance, Yoel Roth, who formerly led the company’s now-decimated efforts to make the platform’s users safe from hate speech and harassment, received waves of death threats after Musk outrageously implied that he was sympathetic to paedophiles.

…What matters is money, and Musk has been allowed to acquire enough of it that he appears to be able to do whatever he likes. Even in the instances in “Extremely Hardcore” when Musk is shown being briefly held to account, it’s almost always the influence of money that has led to his comeuppance. His desire to turn Twitter into a playground for the worst parts of human nature has been mitigated only by the squeamishness of advertisers who don’t want their products displayed alongside posts by neo-Nazis. When he was forced to go through with the purchase, it was because of a body of corporate law that privileges the interests of shareholders above all else — an outcome, law professor Ann Lipton has argued, that is “objectively ludicrous” in the case of a platform like Twitter with such “immense social importance.”

Perhaps, then, it shouldn’t be a surprise that so much of Musk’s focus since acquiring the company has been on attacking the few gadflies that remain.

«

Yes but look if he wasn’t doing this he’d be firing space cannons into the atmosphere to try to promote global cooling which would inevitably go wrong even though he’d been told it was a bad idea.
unique link to this extract

NHS nurses being investigated for ‘industrial-scale’ qualifications fraud • The Guardian

Denis Campbell:

»

More than 700 nurses are caught up in a potential scandal, which a former head of the Royal College of Nursing said could put NHS patients at risk.

The scam allegedly involves proxies impersonating nurses and taking a key test in Nigeria, which must be passed for them to become registered and allowed to work in the UK.

“It’s very, very worrying if … there’s an organisation that’s involving themselves in fraudulent activity, enabling nurses to bypass these tests, or if they are using surrogates to do exams for them because the implication is that we end up in the UK with nurses who aren’t competent,” said Peter Carter, the ex-chief executive of the RCN and ex-chair of three NHS trusts, calling it an “industrial-scale fraud”.

He praised the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) for taking action against those involved “to protect the quality of care and patient safety and the reputation of nurses”.

Nurses coming to work in the UK must be properly qualified, given nurses’ role in administering drugs and intravenous infusions and responding to emergencies such as a cardiac arrest, Carter added.

Forty-eight of the nurses are already working as nurses in the NHS because the NMC is unable to rescind their admission to its register, which anyone wanting to work as a nurse or midwife in Britain has to be, unless directed to do so by an independent panel at a hearing. In the meantime, it has told them to retake the test to prove their skills are good enough to meet its standards but cannot suspend them.

The 48 are due to face individual hearings, starting in March, at which they will be asked to explain how they apparently took and passed the computer-based test (CBT) of numeracy and clinical knowledge taken at the Yunnik test centre in the city of Ibadan. At the hearings, a panel may direct the NMC to remove individuals from the register.

«

Along the lines of the HVAC article from earlier this week: junk qualifications in professional spaces. (Thanks Gregory B for the link.)
unique link to this extract

This iOS trojan is harvesting facial-recognition data • PC Mag Australia

Michael Kan:

»

A cybersecurity company has spotted what might be the first iOS Trojan that’s designed to steal facial-recognition data from users. 

The iOS malware, dubbed GoldPickaxe, has been targeting users in Thailand and possibly Vietnam, according to Group-IB, a cybersecurity provider based in Singapore. 

The malware will harvest biometric data, likely because banks and government agencies in Southeast Asia have been adopting facial-recognition scans to unlock customer access. 

“To exploit the stolen biometric data, the threat actor utilizes AI face-swapping services to create deepfakes by replacing their faces with those of the victims,” Group-IB says in the report. “This method could be used by cybercriminals to gain unauthorized access to the victim’s banking account—a new fraud technique, previously unseen by Group-IB researchers.”

(Credit: Group-IB)
The company has so far observed GoldPickaxe disguising itself as Thai government service apps, and then requesting that users take a photo of their ID card and undergo a facial scan.

An Android version was also uncovered with even more capabilities. However, the malware isn’t circulating on official app stores. Nor does it exploit any iOS vulnerabilities. Instead, the creators of the malware have been tricking victims into installing the malicious app and then granting all the necessary configurations, including powerful device permissions via Apple’s TestFlight or Mobile Device Management profile system.

«

unique link to this extract

Apple phone phishing scams getting better • Krebs on Security

Brian Krebs:

»

A new phone-based phishing scam that spoofs Apple Inc. is likely to fool quite a few people. It starts with an automated call that display’s Apple’s logo, address and real phone number, warning about a data breach at the company. The scary part is that if the recipient is an iPhone user who then requests a call back from Apple’s legitimate customer support Web page, the fake call gets indexed in the iPhone’s “recent calls” list as a previous call from the legitimate Apple Support line.

Jody Westby is the CEO of Global Cyber Risk LLC, a security consulting firm based in Washington, D.C. Westby said earlier today she received an automated call on her iPhone warning that multiple servers containing Apple user IDs had been compromised (the same scammers had called her at 4:34 p.m. the day before, but she didn’t answer that call). The message said she needed to call a 1-866 number before doing anything else with her phone.

…KrebsOnSecurity called the number that the scam message asked Westby to contact (866-277-7794). An automated system answered and said I’d reached Apple Support, and that my expected wait time was about one minute and thirty seconds. About a minute later, a man with an Indian accent answered and inquired as to the reason for my call.

Playing the part of someone who had received the scam call, I told him I’d been alerted about a breach at Apple and that I needed to call this number. After asking me to hold for a brief moment, our call was disconnected.

No doubt this is just another scheme to separate the unwary from their personal and financial details, and to extract some kind of payment (for supposed tech support services or some such). But it is remarkable that Apple’s own devices (or AT&T, which sold her the phone) can’t tell the difference between a call from Apple and someone trying to spoof Apple.

«

unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

The price of LEDs has fallen exponentially, and they have cut lighting costs enormously, creating new possibilities for displays. CC-licensed photo by Yves Sorge on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

There’s another post coming this week at the Social Warming Substack on Friday at 0845 UK time. Free signup.

A selection of 10 links for you. Bright and early. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. Observations and links welcome.

Scientists resort to once-unthinkable solutions to cool the planet • WSJ

Eric Niiler:

»

Dumping chemicals in the ocean? Spraying saltwater into clouds? Injecting reflective particles into the sky? Scientists are resorting to once unthinkable techniques to cool the planet because global efforts to check greenhouse gas emissions are failing.

These geoengineering approaches were once considered taboo by scientists and regulators who feared that tinkering with the environment could have unintended consequences, but now researchers are receiving taxpayer funds and private investments to get out of the lab and test these methods outdoors. 

The shift reflects growing concern that efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions aren’t moving fast enough to prevent the destructive effects of heat waves, storms and floods made worse by climate change. Geoengineering isn’t a substitute for reducing emissions, according to scientists and business leaders involved in the projects. Rather, it is a way to slow climate warming in the next few years while buying time to switch to a carbon-free economy in the longer term.

Three field experiments are under way in the US and overseas. This month, researchers aboard a ship off the northeastern coast of Australia near the Whitsunday Islands are spraying a briny mixture through high-pressure nozzles into the air in an attempt to brighten low-altitude clouds that form over the ocean.

…In Israel, a startup called Stardust Solutions has begun testing a system to disperse a cloud of tiny reflective particles about 60,000 feet in altitude, reflecting sunlight away from Earth to cool the atmosphere in a concept known as solar radiation management, or SRM.

…In Massachusetts, researchers at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution plan to pour 6,000 gallons of a liquid solution of sodium hydroxide, a component of lye, into the ocean 10 miles south of Martha’s Vineyard this summer. They hope the chemical base will act like a big tablet of Tums, lowering the acidity of a patch of surface water and absorbing 20 metric tons of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, storing it safely in the ocean.

«

This is increasingly going to be where organisations and then governments look for the solution: first private organisations try it, then governments do it on a bigger scale, then a billionaire does it on a huge scale because he (you know it’ll be a he) can.
unique link to this extract

Is geothermal about to become the solar of the 2020s? • Heatmap News

Matthew Zeitlin:

»

Fervo is a buzzy, well-funded, and well-connected startup out of Houston that drills wells to produce enhanced geothermal energy, a clean source of power derived from heat beneath the Earth’s surface. But whereas traditional geothermal means tapping into hot water or steam underground, Fervo drills as deep as 9,000 feet [2,700m] down to access hot rocks, which are far more ubiquitous, and then pumps water into them, potentially unlocking many more areas for this kind of power generation.

This week’s announcement follows a pilot project last year where the company was actually able to produce electricity. Now the challenge is producing that electricity at scale — and that requires drilling faster.

Already its new timeline is translating in dramatic cost reductions, the company says, from $9.4m to $4.8m per well. For its Utah site, where it might need to drill 29 wells, back-of-the-envelope math suggests that could translate into up to $130m in savings.

“The biggest expense in drilling is time it takes to drill. The easiest way to reduce drilling costs is to drill faster,” Fervo’s co-founder and chief executive Tim Latimer told me.

Latimer’s big idea behind Fervo is not just a conceptual one about how to generate geothermal power in areas that don’t produce steam or very hot water on their own, but also about how to apply the steady improvement and cost reductions seen in the oil and gas industry to non-carbon emitting power generation that can be available 24 hours a day.

“Oil and gas drilling has become incredibly much more efficient. That’s what drove the shale revolution. We were excited about 45-day wells and now you’ll see fields where people drill wells in 10 days or less,” Latimer told me.

…The idea is that there can be a “learning curve” with drilling geothermal wells, dropping costs over time. “We think geothermal will be on the end of that spectrum like solar or LEDs or battery that benefits from a learning curve because we figured out a way to standardize,” Latimer said. “Fervo is a learning curve company.”

«

This would be good; very good.
unique link to this extract

Apple fans are starting to return their Vision Pros • The Verge

Victoria Song:

»

For some Apple Vision Pro buyers, the honeymoon is already over.

It’s no coincidence that there’s been an uptick on social media of Vision Pro owners saying they’re returning their $3,500 headsets in the past few days. Apple allows you to return any product within 14 days of purchase — and for the first wave of Vision Pro buyers, we’re right about at that point.

Comfort is among the most cited reasons for returns. People have said the headset gives them headaches and triggers motion sickness. The weight of the device, and the fact that most of it is front-loaded, has been another complaint. Parker Ortolani, The Verge’s product manager, told me that he thought using the device led to a burst blood vessel in his eye. At least one other person noted they had a similar experience with redness. (To be fair, VR headset users have anecdotally reported dry eyes and redness for years.)

“Despite being as magical to use as I’d hoped, it was simply way too uncomfortable to wear even for short periods of time both due to the weight and the strap designs. I wanted to use it, but dreaded putting it on,” says Ortolani, who also posted about returning the device.

“It’s just too expensive and unwieldy to even try to get used to the constant headaches and eye strain I was experiencing. I’ll be back for the next one.”

This isn’t surprising. Every human body is unique, which is a problem when you’re scaling wearable production for the mass market. Comfort is inevitably sacrificed — and it affects people disproportionately.

«

Anecdata, but could be indicative. We’d really need to know how many headsets have been sold, and how many are being returned. And we’re unlikely to find that out soon, if ever.
unique link to this extract

Zuckerberg says Quest 3 is ‘the better product’ vs. Apple’s Vision Pro • The Verge

Alex Heath:

»

In a video posted to his Instagram account on Tuesday, Zuckerberg gives his official verdict on the Vision Pro versus his company’s latest Quest 3 headset: “I don’t just think that Quest is the better value, I think Quest is the better product, period.”

«

Ballmer on the original iPhone, in 2007: “500 dollars? Fully subsidized? With a plan? I say that is the most expensive phone in the workld. And it doesn’t appeal to business users because it doesn’t have a keyboard, which makes it not a very good email machine. We have our strategy. We are very happy with the Windows Phone devices in the market today. You can get a Motorola Q series device for $99. It is a very capable machine, can do music, internet and more.”

CmdrTaco on the iPod, 2001: “No wireless. Less [storage] space than a Nomad. Lame.”

Plenty of people have bet against Apple down the years, especially on being cheaper than its products. So, what *was* the storage capacity of a Nomad? Anyone? Bueller?

unique link to this extract

iOS 17.4 nerfs web apps in the EU • MacRumors

Hartley Charlton:

»

As first flagged by security researcher Tommy Mysk and Open Web Advocacy, the second beta release of iOS 17.4 seems to introduce changes that put web apps at a significant disadvantage in Europe. The new beta version of iOS prevents these apps from launching in their own top-level window that takes up the entire screen, relegating them instead to open within Safari, a change that significantly impacts their user experience and functionality. The move effectively demotes PWAs to mere website shortcuts.

Now, when a user in Europe taps a web app icon, they will see a system message asking if they wish to open it in Safari or cancel. The message adds that the web app “will open in your default browser from now on.” When opened in Safari, the web app opens like a bookmark, with no dedicated windowing, notifications, or long-term local storage. Users have seen issues with existing web apps such as data loss, since the Safari version can no longer access local data, as well as broken notifications.

Progressive Web Apps are designed to offer a user experience comparable to that of native apps using web technologies, with the potential for users to add them directly to their home screen with no need for an app store. The latest change is particularly controversial because historically [from 2007-2008 – Overspill Ed.] Apple has suggested that developers who are unwilling to comply with its App Store guidelines could instead focus on web apps. Now, the company’s recent adjustments appear to contradict this stance by limiting the capabilities of PWAs and their ability to compete with native applications in iOS, raising questions about its commitment to supporting web technologies as a viable alternative to the App Store .

…Apple’s decision to alter the functionality of PWAs specifically in the EU could be interpreted as an attempt to navigate the regulatory landscape imposed by the DMA, but it may simply want to prevent users in Europe from using web apps with alternative browser engines. The company has not yet commented on its motivations.

«

I’d never used a PWA (I suppose? How would I distinguish it from an app?) but the possibility that Apple is trying to prevent nefarious goings-on via alternative browser engines seems strong.

unique link to this extract

Financial rationale for investing in fossil fuel industry continues to unravel • IEEFA

»

In 2023, the fossil fuel sector once again lost ground compared to the market as a whole. As oil majors report a 30% decline in annual profits and the sector posts an annual loss of almost 5%, a new report by the Institute of Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) finds that it wasn’t just a bad year to invest in fossil fuels—but a bad decade.

Fossil fuel stocks have dragged down stock market returns over the last 10 years, according to a new IEEFA report, Passive investing in a warming world. This pattern broadly holds despite the fossil fuel sector’s profits in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine. Meanwhile, fossil-free equity indices are gaining market adoption and proving to be better investments. As the long-term outlook for fossil fuels remains negative, a broader market evolution away from carbon continues, and investors should take note.

“The era of stable, blue-chip returns from the fossil fuel sector is long gone,” said Dan Cohn, IEEFA energy finance analyst and co-author of the report.

…The report identifies a counterintuitive opportunity for institutional investors who invest in passively managed equity strategies, which attempt to replicate index returns rather than beat them. Although conventional wisdom holds that excluding any stocks reduces returns from passive portfolios, the opposite has been true in the specific case of fossil fuels during the past decade—limiting fossil fuel exposure has improved returns.

«

In other words, create a funds index which specifically excludes fossil fuel companies and you’ll beat the market.
unique link to this extract

AI could actually help rebuild the middle class • Noēma

David Autor:

»

The utopian vision of our Information Age was that computers would flatten economic hierarchies by democratizing information. In 2005, Marc Andreessen, co-founder of Netscape, told the New York Times’s Thomas Friedman that “today, the most profound thing to me is the fact that a 14-year-old in Romania or Bangalore or the [former] Soviet Union or Vietnam has all the information, all the tools, all the software easily available to apply knowledge however they want.”

But the opposite of this vision has transpired.

Information, it turns out, is merely an input for a more consequential economic function, decision-making, which is the province of elite experts — typically the minority of U.S. adults who hold college or graduate degrees. By making information and calculation cheap and abundant, computerization catalyzed an unprecedented concentration of decision-making power, and accompanying resources, among elite experts.

Simultaneously, it automated away a broad middle-skill stratum of jobs in administrative support, clerical and blue-collar production occupations. Meanwhile, lacking better opportunities, 60% of adults without a bachelor’s degree have been relegated to non-expert, low-paid service jobs.

The unique opportunity that AI offers humanity is to push back against the process started by computerization — to extend the relevance, reach and value of human expertise for a larger set of workers. Because artificial intelligence can weave information and rules with acquired experience to support decision-making, it can enable a larger set of workers equipped with necessary foundational training to perform higher-stakes decision-making tasks currently arrogated to elite experts, such as doctors, lawyers, software engineers and college professors. In essence, AI — used well — can assist with restoring the middle-skill, middle-class heart of the U.S. labor market that has been hollowed out by automation and globalization.

While one may worry that AI will simply render expertise redundant and experts superfluous, history and economic logic suggest otherwise. AI is a tool, like a calculator or a chainsaw, and tools generally aren’t substitutes for expertise but rather levers for its application.

By shortening the distance from intention to result, tools enable workers with proper training and judgment to accomplish tasks that were previously time-consuming, failure-prone or infeasible. Conversely, tools are useless at best — and hazardous at worst — to those lacking relevant training and experience. A pneumatic nail gun is an indispensable time-saver for a roofer and a looming impalement hazard for a home hobbyist. 

«

One of the best lines is early on: “All the people who will turn 30 in the year 2053 have already been born and we cannot make more of them.”
unique link to this extract

Early adopters of Microsoft’s AI bot wonder if it’s worth the money • WSJ

Tom Dotan:

»

Microsoft’s new artificial-intelligence assistant for its bestselling software has been in the hands of testers for more than six months and their reviews are in: useful, but often doesn’t live up to its price.

The company is hoping for one of its biggest hits in decades with Copilot for Microsoft 365, an AI upgrade that plugs into Word, Outlook and Teams. It uses the same technology as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and can summarize emails, generate text and create documents based on natural language prompts.

Companies involved in testing say their employees have been clamoring to test the tool—at least initially. So far, the shortcomings with software including Excel and PowerPoint and its tendency to make mistakes have given some testers pause about whether, at $30 a head per month, it is worth the price.

“I wouldn’t say we’re ready to spend $30 per user for every user in the company,” said Sharon Mandell, the chief information officer at networking hardware company Juniper Networks, which has been testing Copilot since November.

Microsoft has said that early demand from users is unprecedented and the companies testing it have found it valuable. The company hasn’t shared specifics about sign-ups.

…“It has allowed people to say, ‘You know what, there is already 10 other people on the call. I’m going to skip this one. I’m going to catch up in the morning by reading the digest and skipping to the parts of the meeting I really needed to hear,’” said Art Hu, the global chief information officer at Lenovo.

In other areas, testers say the tech has fallen short: Copilot for Microsoft 365, including other generative AI tools, sometimes hallucinated, meaning it fabricated responses. Users said Copilot, at times, would make mistakes on meeting summaries. At one ad agency, a Copilot-generated summary of a meeting once said that “Bob” spoke about “product strategy.”

The problem was that no one named Bob was on the call and no one spoke about product strategy, an executive at the company said.

In other programs—particularly the ones that handle numbers—hallucinations are more problematic. Testers said Excel was one of the programs on which they were less likely to use the AI assistant because asking it to crunch numbers sometimes generated mistakes.

«

unique link to this extract

The election in India is playing out on YouTube • Rest of World

Yashraj Sharma:

»

On September 27, 2023, YouTube celebrated the 15th anniversary of its presence in India. The event started with a video address by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who said YouTube could “awaken the nation” and “initiate a movement.” He called himself a YouTuber in his speech, ending with the quintessential influencer sign-off: “Subscribe to my channel and hit the bell icon to receive all my updates.”

Being influential on YouTube is essential for Modi as India gears up for general elections later this year, where the 73-year-old is seeking a third consecutive term. The Google-owned video-sharing platform has emerged as a strong tool for political messaging in the country, partly due to its large user base: YouTube has 467 million users, while Facebook has 314 million and X (previously Twitter) has 27 million, according to digital insights platform DataReportal. 

As many as 87% of YouTube users in India rely on the platform during national news events, according to a 2021 Oxford Economics research report commissioned by YouTube.

The 2024 general election will be a “YouTube election,” especially in “urban areas,” Apar Gupta, tech lawyer and co-founder of digital rights advocacy group Internet Freedom Foundation, told Rest of World. 

“YouTube is where [the] voter is consuming content. They might not read a newspaper but they are watching YouTube,” Ruchira Chaturvedi, national convenor for social media and digital communications at the Indian National Congress — the country’s main opposition party — told Rest of World.

«

Scary thought. Though the broadcast TV stations aren’t particularly better. But at least they’re not algorithmically biased.
unique link to this extract

LEDs change everything • The Atlantic

Annie Lowrey:

»

Virtually nothing has gotten better and cheaper faster over the past 30 years than LEDs. From 2010 to 2019 alone, LEDs went from accounting for 1% of the global lighting market to nearly 50%, while their cost has declined “exponentially,” as much as 44% a year, one government report found. And as LEDs have improved, so, too, have any number of technologies reliant on or related to them: tablets, at-home-hair-removal devices, televisions, smartphones, light-up toys, cameras.

LEDs have also transformed cultural events involving creative lighting. They’re why stadium shows and EDM festivals look so freaking awesome, to fangirl for a minute, and why even many just-getting-started bands have pretty neat light displays. They’re why so many parks and zoos are lit up like Burning Man at night. They’re an integral element of today’s underground-dance-party revival, and why our cities are all of a sudden studded with rave caves.

…The programmability of these lights is the main characteristic that distinguishes them from incandescents before them: You could point a spotlight around and put filters on top of it, but you couldn’t do anything like what LEDs do, at least not easily. Anthony Rowe and Liam Birtles are members of the British collective Squidsoup, whose 2013 work Submergence is one of the most famous (and most copied) immersive digital artworks. The idea, Rowe told me, was to “explode” a screen, allowing a viewer to float among its pixels. In their new collaboration with the electronic musician Four Tet, hundreds of people dance while heaven-lit by thousands of suspended LED lights that somehow seem to be both a synaesthetic representation of the music and capable of bouncing along with the crowd.

«

Easily overlooked how LEDs have totally altered power demands in offices and, especially, homes, where you might have 1kW of lightbulbs just for a standard house. Now you can get the same amount of lighting using less than 100W total. Over the course of humanity’s existence, the cost of light when it’s dark has plummeted.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

The quality of USB memory sticks is falling, according to new research, because flawed memory is being resold. CC-licensed photo by Brett Jordan on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

There’s another post coming this week at the Social Warming Substack on Friday at 0845 UK time. Free signup.

A selection of 10 links for you. But which year? I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. Observations and links welcome.

Biden leading US push for OpenRAN intended to undercut Huawei • The Washington Post

Eva Dou:

»

As President Biden met with heads of state around the world these past couple of years, he’s been repeating a curious phrase: “Open RAN.”

This obscure technology for cellular towers — which the Brookings Institution once dubbed the “Huawei killer” — is Washington’s anointed champion to try to unseat Chinese tech giant Huawei Technologies from its throne as the largest supplier of the “pipes” that carry the world’s internet data and phone calls.

Open radio access networks, or OpenRAN, is an emerging technology for cell towers that allows for the use of mix-and-match parts from different vendors — a little akin to Google’s Android ecosystem. This diverges from the Apple-esque, proprietary, all-in-one systems from Huawei, Ericsson and Nokia that dominate the market. US officials hope that this new initiative will help US vendors get back in a game they were largely squeezed out of during two decades of globalization.

Biden’s personal appeals to the leaders of India, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia and other countries reflect the issue as a top priority in Washington. A broad administration push is underway to persuade countries around the world to say “yes” to OpenRAN and “no” to Huawei.

“This has been a whole-of-government approach,” Alan Davidson, assistant secretary of commerce and National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) administrator, said in an interview. “We’ve been working very closely with the State Department, with the White House. …We’re trying to bring all the tools that we have to bear.”

«

As you might expect, Nokia and Ericsson aren’t that mad keen about an open standard backed by the US government. (Thanks G for the link.)
unique link to this extract

The Atlantic Ocean is headed for a tipping point which would see extreme climate change within decades • The Conversation

Henk A. Dijkstra, René van Westen and Michael Kliphuis are scientists at Utrecht University:

»

Instruments deployed in the Atlantic ocean starting in 2004 show that the Atlantic Ocean circulation has observably slowed over the past two decades, possibly to its weakest state in almost a millennium. Studies also suggest that the circulation has reached a dangerous tipping point in the past that sent it into a precipitous, unstoppable decline, and that it could hit that tipping point again as the planet warms and glaciers and ice sheets melt.

In a new study using the latest generation of Earth’s climate models, we simulated the flow of fresh water until the ocean circulation reached that tipping point.

The results showed that the circulation could fully shut down within a century of hitting the tipping point, and that it’s headed in that direction. If that happened, average temperatures would drop by several degrees in North America, parts of Asia and Europe, and people would see severe and cascading consequences around the world.

We also discovered a physics-based early warning signal that can alert the world when the Atlantic Ocean circulation is nearing its tipping point.

…Regions that are influenced by the Gulf Stream receive substantially less heat when the circulation stops. This cools the North American and European continents by a few degrees.

The European climate is much more influenced by the Gulf Stream than other regions. In our experiment, that meant parts of the continent changed at more than 5ºF (3ºC) per decade – far faster than today’s global warming of about 0.36ºF (0.2ºC) per decade. We found that parts of Norway would experience temperature drops of more than 36ºF (20ºC). On the other hand, regions in the Southern Hemisphere would warm by a few degrees.

These temperature changes develop over about 100 years. That might seem like a long time, but on typical climate time scales, it is abrupt.

«

Still looking for good news on the climate. Still not finding it.
unique link to this extract

You’re not imagining things – USB memory sticks are getting worse • The Register

Dan Robinson:

»

A German data recovery specialist has confirmed what many readers will have suspected: USB memory sticks are getting less reliable. The cause, as you might have guessed, is inferior memory chips, while the move to storing multiple bits per flash cell also plays a part.

CBL Data Recovery posted that the quality of newer memory components in microSD and USB sticks is declining, and it reported that USB sticks where the NAND manufacturer’s logo had been removed from the chip are increasingly turning up in its data recovery laboratory.

It suspects that flash chips from manufacturers such as SK hynix, Sandisk or Samsung that fail quality control checks are being resold into the market, but marked as components with lower memory capacities.

“When we opened defective USB sticks last year, we found an alarming number of inferior memory chips with reduced capacity and the manufacturer’s logo removed from the chip,” wrote CBL Managing Director Conrad Heinicke (translated from German).

Heinicke said that many of the USB sticks actually contained microSD cards that had been mounted onto the circuit board and were being managed by an external controller chip. While USB sticks like this were mostly promotional gifts, he said, there were also branded products among them, adding: “You shouldn’t rely too much on the reliability of flash memory.”

Heinicke’s view is that the adoption of multi-level cell architectures, where a single memory cell is coaxed into storing more than just a single bit by varying the voltage, has also exacerbated the situation. With quad level cells (QLC), for example, four bits are stored per cell, which means that 16 states have to be distinguished.

This path was chosen by the NAND flash manufacturers because it delivers greater storage density, which means higher capacity drives and lower costs per GB. But it also has implications for the endurance, or longevity of the cells. In other words, the cells wear out faster the more bits they are used to store.

«

Personally I only use USB sticks to store photos briefly so I can print them at Boots. It’s nearly as dead as the DVD.
unique link to this extract

Lies, damned lies, and manometer readings • Asterisk

Jesse Smith:

»

“It just knows.” 

The senior HVAC [heating/ventilation/air conditioning] technician I’d been working with on a home remodel answered with the conviction of decades of experience. I, on the other hand, was less certain. How could a new furnace “know” that it had just been connected to a 20-year-old air conditioner (from a competing brand), somehow read that unit’s cooling capacity, and then calibrate its own output to the precisely required airflow? In a bid to reconcile the reading on my manometer [a device that measures fluid pressures] with the tech’s supposed savvy, I asked whether he was certain. He was, he told me, quite positive. “Tell you what,” he said. “If I’m wrong, then there’s probably 200 air conditioners in Princeton with bad airflow. And that can’t be right.”

…I’d already had — for years leading up to the housing crash — nagging concerns about the suboptimal HVAC performance on our projects. In spite of paying premiums to local, supposedly expert subcontractors, the homes we worked in were frequently plagued by problems: high humidity, lots of noise, room-to-room temperature differences, and some full mechanical failures. HVAC training classes were partly a way to boost revenue, but I also figured that having that expertise would allow me to help our HVAC subcontractors make minor tweaks to greatly improve their installations. And that’s how I found myself in a Princeton basement reading a digital display that suggested the furnace, in fact, didn’t know it had been connected to anything. It had to be told.

I soon came to realize that there were probably many more than 200 air conditioners with bad airflow in Princeton.

«

You might care nothing about HVAC, but you read this and think: in how many other manual professions (because HVAC technicians have to pass certification of sorts in the US) do people just lie? Some of the scams outlined in the piece are quite eye-opening.
unique link to this extract

Running Ethernet over existing coaxial cable • Simon Willison’s TILs

Simon Willison:

»

I recently noticed that the router in our garage was providing around 900 Mbps if I plugged my laptop directly into it via an Ethernet cable, but that speed fell to around 80Mbps (less than 1/10th that speed) elsewhere in our house.

Our house came pre-wired with Ethernet, and we run a Netgear Orbi mesh network where the main router lives in the garage and the other two satellite routers are connected to it via that in-the-wall Ethernet.

Those numbers would seem to indicate that the Ethernet that is built into the walls is Cat5, which maxes out at about 100Mbps. If we had Cat5e or Cat6 those cables would likely go up to 1000Mbps instead.

After some poking around I convinced myself that this was the problem – that the cables in the walls were Cat5. I didn’t particularly want to run new cables through our walls, so I poked around with ChatGPT to see if there were any alternatives. It led me to an option called MoCA – for Multimedia over Coax Alliance.

MoCA lets you run Ethernet over existing coaxial cables. And our house has coaxial cables running from the garage to several different rooms. Crucially, MoCA 2.5 can run at up to 2.5Gbps, easily enough to handle the 900Mbps we’re getting in the garage. I ordered a ScreenBeam MoCA 2.5 Network Adapter kit from Amazon ($129.99 at time of purchase) to see if I could hook one of our Orbi satellites up to the garage router via the coaxial cables.

… and it seems to work!

Today I installed the MoCA adapters. There are two of them – one for each end of the in-wall coaxial cable. They each included a power adapter, a Cat5e Ethernet cable and a coaxial cable, plus a “splitter” in case I wanted to also run a TV off the same cable

«

This seems like magic, though of course Ethernet – and any digital signalling, really – is just a carefully crafted sequence of high-frequency pulses: frequency A is a 1, frequency B is a 0, and you can multiplex many frequencies to have parallel data streams. If your cabling doesn’t attenuate the signals too much (and an in-house run of coax won’t) then you can transmit high data volumes. Which is also how Ethernet-over-mains systems work.
unique link to this extract

Can you freeze…? • MenuAid

Dan Wirepa:

»

Ever found yourself too excited at the prospect of $1 avocados, bought too many, then realised you’ll never get through them in time? Well, if you’ve ever wondered “Can you freeze avocados?”, you’re in luck!

You can freeze pretty much anything!

Learning how to utilise your freezer more effectively can help you to save money and reduce food waste. And, it can also make meal planning and preparation a breeze. Discover new foods you didn’t know you could freeze, and stop throwing perfectly good money food into the bin.

«

I think this is best read with a Bob The Builder voice: “Can we freeze it? Yes We CAN!” (Perhaps Bob The Freezer. Fred The Freezer? Just spitballing here, but I’m pretty sure we can get Netflix to commission one, maybe two seasons if we work at it.)
unique link to this extract

Bluesky opens up to the world – but can anything really replace Twitter? • The Guardian

Alex Hern:

»

When it’s finished, the vision for Bluesky is to hover somewhere between a straight-up replacement for Twitter and a fully decentralised service like Mastodon, the second of the big three post-Twitter social networks: like Mastodon, the technology underpinning Bluesky should eventually allow your account to outlast the company that created it, but unlike Mastodon, Bluesky is less eager to foreground the technological differences between it and Twitter, with the vast majority of users remaining on the official app and service for the foreseeable future.

And then there’s Threads. Meta’s Twitter clone is, unquestionably, the biggest of the three by user count alone, but it’s also barely made a ripple in the wider culture. The site’s policy of suppressing political content – it won’t get algorithmic promotion, according to Threads’ platform safety policies – doesn’t help matters. There are parallels with earlier periods of online culture, here: Twitter dominated discussion even while having a fraction of the size of Facebook, and TikTok does the same despite the vastly larger number of users on YouTube.

Elizabeth Lopatto, at the Verge, explained the disconnect with a taxonomy so spot-on that I can’t do anything but quote her at length:

»

The silent majority of every successful text-based social media site is lurkers. These are sane, normal people with sane, normal lives … The influencer is building a business. They are making #content … The commenter is trying to have a conversation with another human being. They are hoping, however misguidedly, to have a meaningful interaction online … The reply guy can be thought of as the most important subclass of commenter; they are specific. They are usually interacting with or on behalf of a favored internet user … Finally, we have the poster, sometimes referred to as a poaster. The poster is required for every social network to function.

«

The issue facing all Twitter replacements is that the balance is off. Threads is massive, but its user base is lurkers and influencers. Like being in the audience of a Marvel movie, you may consume some professionally produced content, but you’re certainly not going to form any lasting memories. For the past year, Bluesky has been pure posters, locked in a room with each other, deprived of much of the dopamine that they need to maintain their frenetic energy. And Mastodon is a community of commenters and reply guys, decentralised to the point that it’s possible to have a nice chat, but difficult to discern a conversation arising from within.

«

I tried Bluesky a while back. Didn’t catch for me.
unique link to this extract

Apple won’t be forced to open up iMessage by EU • The Verge

Jon Porter:

»

“Following a thorough assessment of all arguments, taking into account input by relevant stakeholders, and after hearing the Digital Markets Advisory Committee, the Commission found that iMessage, Bing, Edge and Microsoft Advertising do not qualify as gatekeeper services,” the EU’s press release reads, despite them meeting the quantitative thresholds of a core platform service designation. Both Apple and Microsoft welcomed the Commission’s decision in statements made to The Verge.

The decision is the culmination of a five month investigation which the Commission opened when it published its list of 22 regulated services last September. Although it designated Apple’s App Store, Safari browser, and iOS operating system as core platform services, it held off on making a final decision on iMessage until an investigation could be completed. A similar investigation into iPadOS is ongoing.

Meta, meanwhile, has seen two of its messaging platforms, WhatsApp and Messenger, designated as core platform services under the DMA, and has been working to make them interoperable with third-party services. The company recently outlined how WhatsApp’s interoperability will work, explaining how its users will have to opt-in to receiving communications from external messaging apps, and that these messages will then appear in a separate inbox. Companies that want to interoperate with WhatsApp will have to sign an agreement with Meta and follow its terms.

…Google expressed disappointment with the Commission’s decision. “Excluding these popular services from DMA rules means consumers and businesses won’t be offered the breadth of choice that already exists on other, more open platforms,” Google spokesperson Emily Clarke told The Verge in a statement.

«

Sure that if Meta needs any help drafting its external messaging agreement then Apple has people who could help make it unpalatable to anyone by imposing per-message charges and so on.
unique link to this extract

AI is starting to threaten white-collar jobs. Few industries are immune • WSJ

Ray Smith:

»

Since last May, companies have attributed more than 4,600 job cuts to AI, particularly in media and tech, according to [senior vice president of outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Andy] Challenger’s count. The firm estimates the full tally of AI-related job cuts is likely higher, since many companies haven’t explicitly linked cuts to AI adoption in layoff announcements.

Meanwhile, the number of professionals who now use generative AI in their daily work lives has surged. A majority of more than 15,000 workers in fields ranging from financial services to marketing analytics and professional services said they were using the technology at least once a week in late 2023, a sharp jump from May, according to Oliver Wyman Forum, the research arm of management-consulting group Oliver Wyman, which conducted the survey.

Nearly two-thirds of those white-collar workers said their productivity had improved as a result, compared with 54% of blue-collar workers who had incorporated generative AI into their jobs.

Alphabet’s Google last month laid off hundreds of employees in business areas including hardware and internal-software tools as it reins in costs and shifts more investments into AI development. The language-learning software company Duolingo said in the same week that it had cut 10% of its contractors and that AI would replace some of the content creation they had handled. 

…United Parcel Service said that it would cut 12,000 jobs—primarily those of management staff and some contract workers—and that those positions weren’t likely to return even when the package-shipping business picks up again. The company has ramped up its use of machine learning in processes such as determining what to charge customers for shipments. As a result, the company’s pricing department has needed fewer people.

«

unique link to this extract

The one internet hack that could save everything • WIRED

Jaron Lanier and Alison Stanger (the latter is the Leng professor of international politics and economics at Middlebury College) have a modest proposal – delete Section 230 from US law:

»

An individual yelling threats at someone in passing, for instance, is quite different from a million people yelling threats. This type of amplified, stochastic harassment has become a constant feature of our times—chilling speech—and it is possible that in a post-230 world, platforms would be compelled to prevent it. It is sometimes imagined that there are only two choices: a world of viral harassment or a world of top-down smothering of speech. But there is a third option: a world of speech in which viral harassment is tamped down but ideas are not. Defining this middle option will require some time to sort out, but it is doable without 230, just as it is possible to define the limits of viral financial transactions to make Ponzi schemes illegal.

With this accomplished, content moderation for companies would be a vastly simpler proposition. Companies need only uphold the First Amendment, and the courts would finally develop the precedents and tests to help them do that, rather than the onus of moderation being entirely on companies alone. The United States has more than 200 years of First Amendment jurisprudence that establishes categories of less protected speech—obscenity, defamation, incitement, fighting words—to build upon, and Section 230 has effectively impeded its development for online expression. The perverse result has been the elevation of algorithms over constitutional law, effectively ceding judicial power.

When the jurisprudential dust has cleared, the United States would be exporting the democracy-promoting First Amendment to other countries rather than Section 230’s authoritarian-friendly liability shield and the sewer of least-common-denominator content that holds human attention but does not bring out the best in us.

«

Included because it’s the most fantastic nonsense; spotting where the lacunae in the argument lie is mostly left as an exercise for the reader, but it’s worth pointing out that contrary to their claims, Section 230 (which specifies that providers of internet services aren’t treated as “publishers” like newspapers) has not of itself invented clickbait, attention-whoring or doxing. You only have to look at newspapers and magazines in the US and beyond which existed long before the internet to realise that.

Plus removing S230 would turn every service provider into a publisher. YouTube would grind to a halt at once as it tried to premoderate the videos being uploaded.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Could a rogue billionaire build their own nuclear weapon and threaten the world, James Bond villain style? The Pentagon thinks.. maybe, just maybe. CC-licensed photo by Dennis Jarvis on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

There’s another post coming this week at the Social Warming Substack on Friday at 0845 UK time. Free signup.

A selection of 11 links for you. Sorry, how many? I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. Observations and links welcome.

‘Better than a real man’: young Chinese women turn to AI boyfriends • AFP via Digital Journal

»

Twenty-five-year-old Chinese office worker Tufei says her boyfriend has everything she could ask for in a romantic partner: he’s kind, empathetic, and sometimes they talk for hours.

Except he isn’t real.

Her “boyfriend” is a chatbot on an app called “Glow”, an artificial intelligence platform created by Shanghai start-up MiniMax that is part of a blossoming industry in China offering friendly — even romantic — human-robot relations.

“He knows how to talk to women better than a real man,” said Tufei, from Xi’an in northern China, who preferred to use a pseudonym rather than her real name.

“He comforts me when I have period pain. I confide in him about my problems at work,” she told AFP.

“I feel like I’m in a romantic relationship.”

The app is free — the company has other paid content — and Chinese trade publications have reported daily downloads of Glow’s app in the thousands in recent weeks.

Some Chinese tech companies have run into trouble in the past for the illegal use of users’ data but, despite the risks, users say they are driven by a desire for companionship because China’s fast pace of life and urban isolation make loneliness an issue for many.

“It’s difficult to meet the ideal boyfriend in real life,” Wang Xiuting, a 22-year-old student in Beijing, told Agence France-Presse.

“People have different personalities, which often generates friction,” she said.

While humans may be set in their ways, artificial intelligence gradually adapts to the user’s personality — remembering what they say and adjusting its speech accordingly.

«

Just very slightly concerning. Especially for China, where birth rates are falling.
unique link to this extract

Boomers will define the Ozempic era • The Atlantic

Daniel Engber:

»

Imagine an older man goes in to see his doctor. He’s 72 years old and moderately overweight: 5-foot-10, 190 pounds. His blood tests show high levels of triglycerides. Given his BMI—27.3—the man qualifies for taking semaglutide or tirzepatide, two of the wildly popular injectable drugs for diabetes and obesity that have produced dramatic weight loss in clinical trials. So he asks for a prescription, because his 50th college reunion is approaching and he’d like to get back to his freshman-year weight.

He certainly could use these drugs to lose weight, says Thomas Wadden, a clinical psychologist and obesity researcher at the University of Pennsylvania, who recently laid out this hypothetical in an academic paper. But should he? And what about the tens of millions of Americans 65 and older who aren’t simply trying to slim down for a cocktail party, but live with diagnosable obesity? Should they be on Wegovy or Zepbound?

Already, seniors make up 26.6% of the people who have been prescribed these and other GLP-1 agonists, including Ozempic, since 2018, according to a report from Truveta, which draws data from a large network of health-care systems. In the coming years, that proportion could rise even higher: The bipartisan Treat and Reduce Obesity Act, introduced in Congress last July, would allow Medicare to cover drug treatments for obesity among its roughly 50 million Part D enrollees above the age of 65; in principle, about two-fifths of that number would qualify as patients.

Even if this law doesn’t pass (and it’s been introduced half a dozen times since 2012), America’s retirees will continue to be prescribed these drugs for diabetes in enormous numbers, and they’ll be losing weight on them as well. One way or another, the Boomers will be giving shape to our Ozempic Age.

Economists say the cost to Medicare of giving new drugs for obesity to just a fraction of this aging generation would be staggering—$13.6bn a year, according to an estimate published in The New England Journal of Medicine last March.

«

unique link to this extract

AR and the (possible) return of skeuomorphism • Thoughts by Oleksii

Oleksii:

»

Skeuomorphism was widely popular in UI design for computers, mobile phones and then smart watches for a long time. Probably the most famous example is Apple UI under Steve Jobs leadership. The purpose of skeuomorphism was to make interfaces “affordable” and easily understandable by users who didn’t have prior experience of interacting with new devices.

Over time, it became clear that people got used to the virtual interfaces and there was no more need in direct representation of physical things on our screens, so the design became flat and minimalistic.

…But yesterday I saw a post on Threads by @yasirbugra [showing the idea of a virtual watch appearing on your wrist when you turned it as if to read the time].

It came to my mind that this is the real possibility of seeing skeuomorphism back, maybe even in a more functional form than we had on flat screens! If AR/XR devices like Quest, Vision Pro and their successors become popular among wide audience, it might be easier and more convenient for people to start using them with UI that closely resembles real objects, and not flat screens hanging around. This is not the case for any usage obviously, but I can imagine that “leaving” virtual “things” (like a notebook or a book) on a table or a bookshelf can be a nice step of making AR blend with our daily life seamlessly. And unlike for the case with 2D screens, we can now interact with virtual object in different ways by moving them around, rotating etc.

«

unique link to this extract

What’s wrong with this rental listing? The furniture is AI • Vice

Hayden Vernon:

»

Michael Anthony wasn’t sure straightaway, but it was the kid’s bunk bed that gave it away. The bed’s two overlapping ladders were a design decision that no human would make, but the sort of uncanny slip that has become the hallmark of AI generated images. 

“I got an inkling as I went through the pictures, and suddenly it just didn’t seem right,” the 28-year-old software engineer tells VICE. Originally, he thought the weird pictures in the Rightmove listing were just a case of an over-eager estate agent on Photoshop. But after posting some of the images on the Spotted on Rightmove subreddit, people pointed out it was more than likely AI. “To be honest, I thought it was pretty impressive,” he says. “It’s come a long way in the past year really, hasn’t it?” 

Michael had stumbled across a growing phenomenon: estate agents furnishing listing photos with AI. Agents are increasingly playing their own surreal version of The Sims, dressing up adverts with AI furniture to make depressing rental flats look like they’ve come out of the IKEA catalogue. 

Virtual staging, as the process of adding fake furniture to property pics is known, has been around for a while, but it was previously done using standard image editing software. With the growth of generative AI tools, agents no longer have to rely on expensive graphics people (or their own crap Photoshop skills) to furnish property adverts. 

«

Wonder what the expensive graphics people are going to do now. Estate agents (realtors, in the US) are always quick to embrace The New Thing: they have managed to find a real use for drones, taking aerial pictures of properties. Jumping onto the AI bandwagon is all in a day’s work.
unique link to this extract

Streaming services are spoiling the Super Bowl • The Verge

Jacob Kastrenakes:

»

Tens of millions of people gathered together to watch the Super Bowl last night — but they weren’t all watching it at exactly the same time. Cable streams of the game delivered footage that was around 50 seconds behind what was happening on the field, and the figure for online streaming services was even worse. Some viewers were watching a stream that was a minute-and-a-half behind the real world, leaving plenty of time for social media posts and push notifications to spoil what was about to happen in the game.

The figures, from streaming tech company Phenix, show that streaming still has a ways to go to catch up with other — and, often, older — methods of watching TV. Hulu, NFL Plus, and DirecTV Stream were on average more than a minute behind the action on the field. Fubo TV was the worst, with an average delay of almost 87 seconds and some users seeing a delay of up to two minutes.

There’s always going to be some delay between a real-time event and the footage appearing on a TV set across the country. But Phenix’s data shows that there’s very much room for improvement. Verizon FiOS had a delay of just 29 seconds. And the best performance of all came from the oldest method out there: over-the-air broadcasts. People getting the game from a broadcast signal experienced the briefest delay, seeing what was happening just 22 seconds after it occurred on the field.

These delays may sound brief, but they make a big difference in the way people experience live events today. It may take a minute for video to get from the field to your TV, but a social media post about a touchdown or interception can make it to your phone much quicker. The delay doesn’t matter if you’re just watching with friends, but nowadays, just about every viewer has access to faster sources of information in their pocket — the delay both puts them behind the online conversation and reveals what’s coming next.

«

This does raise the question of how the social media posts are faster than the video stream. Is the implication that people at the game are posting updates? Or just people on OTA broadcasts?
unique link to this extract

Falsehoods programmers believe about time zones • Zain Rizvi

Zain Rivzi:

»

My aunt has a problem. She loves joining Zoom meetings, but they’re all hosted in different time zones. It’s hard to remember if she should add 4 hours, subtract 3, or what. She’s not the most technical person, so google isn’t an option. She has to ask for help.

Every. Single. Time.

And, for the less technically minded, it’s also error-prone.

It got me thinking: What if event organizers could share a link that would do the work for you? If someone clicked on mytime.at/5pm/EST, they would see their local version of that time. It sounded simple enough.

I began coding. I knew trying to manage time is a fool’s errand, but that’s what datetime libraries are for. I would merely build an extra time zone conversion layer on top. Surely that couldn’t be complicated.

…Right?

I soon discovered just how wrong I was. One after another, I kept learning the falsehood of yet another “fact” that had seemed obviously true. Eventually my original vision became literally impossible to pull off without making serious compromises (more about that in a future blog post).

Hopefully this list will help you avoid the landmines I stepped on. All the falsehoods below are ones I’d considered true at some point in my adult life.

Most of them I believed just one month ago.

«

unique link to this extract

Why dynamic message signs confuse many drivers and increase the number of accidents • Frequent Business Traveler

Jonathan Spira:

»

The driver seeks out information and services which he thinks he needs; others, he tends to ignore.  Adding extraneous and superfluous messages about sleighs and Yule can only serve to confuse the already overloaded driver.

Only when the severe changes or unusual conditions that require abrupt adjustments in maneuvering the vehicle appear does the driver require proper, timely and attention getting warnings.

A good example of such a situation occurred on December 28, 2023, when 15 states issued “heavy fog” warnings. Variable-message signs warned of “Heavy Fog” and told drivers to “Reduce Speed.” Another occurred on January 16, 2024, when 100 million people in the United States remained under windchill advisories and winter storm warnings, and signs were programmed to warn of “Poor Driving Conditions,” telling drivers to “Reduce Speed.”

While messages such as these demonstrate not only the proper and intended use of variable-message signage but also will cause minimal information overload, attempts to successfully display longer instructive or educational messages continue to elude the custodians of the signs.

Drivers in New York State saw a message that reads “Crash. No Injuries. Minor Damage.” We undertook an informal survey of 30 licensed drivers and asked them what the meaning of this particular sign was. Over 80% said that they understood it to mean that there was a minor crash ahead, albeit with no injuries and minor damage.” That, in fact, was my initial interpretation as well… until I kept seeing it on almost every sign.

My research, which entailed calling the state’s Department of Transportation, revealed that the sign was intended to inform drivers that, should they happen upon the scene of an accident, the new New York State “Move Over” law requires them to slow down and move left one full lane (the same goes for other stopped vehicles and roadway construction crews, incidentally).

Despite the fact that this sign is almost universally misunderstood, it continues appear throughout the New York metro area, leaving driver after driver with the impression that he was approaching the scene of an accident.

«

Later in the piece it mentions “humourous” signs, but the study outcomes on these are conflicting. What gets my goat is dynamic signs which show information that ceased to be correct hours ago, and which the controllers should know is wrong because they have traffic cameras.
unique link to this extract

His best friend was a warthog. One day, it decided to kill him • Texas Monthly

Peter Holley:

»

as he sat in a pool of his own blood on a beautiful October evening in 2022, Austin Riley couldn’t help but acknowledge the morbid absurdity of his current predicament. He’d spent decades conquering brain injuries only to be killed while doing mundane chores on his family’s 130-acre Hill Country ranch in Boerne. “After all I’d been through,” he said, “I just couldn’t believe that this was how it was going to end.” 

As he slumped against a fence and his mangled body began to shut down, Austin’s mind went into overdrive. He thought about his girlfriend, Kennedy, whom he’d never get a chance to marry, and the children he’d never be able to raise. He thought about how much he loved his parents and how badly he wished he could thank them for the life they’d provided. He thought about the land before him, a valley accentuated by crimson and amber foliage that seemed to glitter in the evening light, and realized it had never seemed more beautiful than it did in that moment. 

«

This is not a short read. But it is worthwhile. The description of what happened to him, and what he had to do in order to survive, is incredible. It also shows how you get a clarity of thinking when you’re about to die from calamitous injuries.
unique link to this extract

Prompt Engineering is a job of the past • We Are Developers

Adrien Book:

»

For a long time, my thinking on prompt engineering was as follows:

• Productized LLMs are a brand-new technology that people have not yet fully tamed
• Twitter reply guys have just been burnt by crypto and need a new grift
• They see AI emerge as the “next big thing”, but have no engineering or coding talent; they do, however, speak English (barely)
• They rebrand themselves as “prompt engineers” (sounds fancy! Looks good on LinkedIn!) and share obvious advice to “help” people get “the most out of ChatGPT”

If it doesn’t sound like a real job that someone might be paid to do, trust your instinct. The above is correct for a majority of the “prompt engineers” you see on social media. However, having spoken to actual experts, my thinking has evolved. The truth is closer to:

• Productized LLMs are a brand-new technology that people have not yet fully tamed
• Sometimes LLMs behave in unexpected ways, and we need to understand why
• Because AI is a black box, we also need to understand what it can and cannot do so it can be better marketed
• Doing so involves more data analysis than spending 8 hours a day making wild guesses into a text box… but that’s also part of the job

Though this role is indeed important for today’s tech company, it was more so two years ago. Prompt engineering is doomed to disappear in the coming months.

…Less than a year ago, as MidJourney was taking off, there were talks of people making a living by selling elaborate prompt. How quickly this became laughable! It’s like calling yourself a typist in 2020. Technology has evolved in such a way that everyone can do it; it’s becoming less of a distinct profession and more a skill integrated into broader roles.

The irony is not lost on me that the first job created by AI might also be the first to vanish. Although the role will remain lucrative for a select few data scientists ($300k+)… the whole profession is an outlier. In fact, over the next few months, we will see “real” prompt engineers pivot towards becoming solutions engineer and work closely to clients.

«

unique link to this extract

Canada to ban the Flipper Zero to stop surge in car thefts • BleepingComputer

Sergiu Gatlan:

»

The Canadian government plans to ban the Flipper Zero and similar devices after tagging them as tools thieves can use to steal cars.

The Flipper Zero is a portable and programmable pen-testing tool that helps experiment with and debug various hardware and digital devices over multiple protocols, including RFID, radio, NFC, infrared, and Bluetooth.

Users have been demonstrating Flipper Zero’s features in videos shared online since its release, showcasing its capacity to conduct replay attacks to unlock cars, open garage doors, activate doorbells, and clone various digital keys.

“Criminals have been using sophisticated tools to steal cars. And Canadians are rightfully worried,” Canadian Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne tweeted on Wednesday. “Today, I announced we are banning the importation, sale and use of consumer hacking devices, like flippers, used to commit these crimes.”

…According to the Canadian government, around 90,000 vehicles (or one car every six minutes) are reported stolen every year, with car theft resulting in $1bn in annual losses, including insurance costs for fixing and replacing stolen cars. The figures shared by the Canadian government when describing the car theft surge currently impacting Canada align with the most recent data shared by the Statistics Canada government agency, which shows an increasing number of car theft reports since 2021.

«

OK so it’s a scary terrible device, right? Not so fast:

»

Flipper Devices, the company behind the devices, says the gadget can’t be used to steal vehicles built within the last 24 years.

“Flipper Zero can’t be used to hijack any car, specifically the ones produced after the 1990s, since their security systems have rolling codes,” Flipper Devices COO Alex Kulagin told BleepingComputer.

«

Even in 2017, the average age of vehicles in Canada was 10 years. Stable/horse/door/bolted.
unique link to this extract

Could a rogue billionaire make a nuclear weapon? • WSJ

Sharon Weinberger:

»

The report [on this question, written by the Pentagon in 2013] read like background notes for an airport thriller: a Bond-villain-like corporation would set up shop as a legitimate business, managing a series of nominally independent subsidiaries responsible for different parts of weapons production in locations around the world. One company, for example, would be responsible for designing the centrifuges; another would produce the highly enriched uranium; a third would do the chemical processing. A company could even work directly with a rogue nuclear power. “Would our hypothesized enterprise ever go into partnership with North Korea? Or perhaps with Iran?” the report asks.

When I first read the study in 2018, it struck me as a fascinating premise, but implausible. Nuclear weapons are the domain of nations for a reason: they require huge facilities, big budgets and technical expertise you can’t exactly advertise for on LinkedIn. 

But now, just five years later—and more than a decade after the study was completed—much has changed in the world. Private companies have long been involved in building weapons, including nuclear weapons, but the federal government has traditionally been the one funding and controlling the technologies. Now, even the Pentagon acknowledges that private capital is the dominant source of funding for key technologies.

…“What could you achieve with a billion? What could you achieve with $10 billion? And is that really beyond the reach of some individuals?” [report contributor Brian Jenkins] said. “Well, in the case of an Elon Musk, it means you can put rockets into space without NASA. And that’s the point of this.”

Miles Townes, who left graduate school to work on the study, told me he still thinks about it every day. He said the study was sparked by the way gas centrifuges had lowered the bar to entry when it came to nuclear weapons.

In the movies, spies turn over detailed designs for a nuclear weapon. But nuclear experts argue that what is truly secret is not necessarily how to design the weapon—much of that exists on the Internet or in the public domain—but the processes necessary to make the critical materials, like highly enriched uranium.

«

OK, perhaps let’s keep Musk just focussed on Twitter.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Climate change is coming for World Cup skiing, creating slushy slopes on competition days. CC-licensed photo by Manuel Bierbauer on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 10 links for you. Surely not again. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. Observations and links welcome.

Did climate change help this skier achieve the impossible? • WIRED

Charlie Metcalfe:

»

After a big mistake on his first run, Daniel Yule assumed he was out of the men’s slalom at this season’s Alpine Ski World Cup. “I’d already packed my bags, and I was ready to go back to the hotel,” he said in a TV interview after last weekend’s event in Chamonix, France.

Instead, his time was just good enough to scrape into the second round. From there, in last place, the Swiss skier went on to win the entire event. Never before in 58 years of the competition had someone risen from such a low position to claim the trophy in a single run. It was a testament to Yule’s skiing—but also to the unignorable reality of climate change.

The temperature that day in Chamonix had risen to an extraordinary 12ºC (54ºF)—far higher than the average maximum in February of –1ºC. Competition rules stipulate that slalom skiers perform their second run in reverse order of their rank after the first—meaning that Yule, in last place, would go first on the second run on an unbroken piste. His competitors would be following on a slope rapidly melting under the midday sun, carved up by those before them, and the winner would be whoever clocked the lowest aggregate time across their two runs. “I was definitely lucky,” Yule said.

Slalom skiing demands that competitors navigate their way around a series of gates as they descend. Turning, therefore, is the defining factor of a race. When skiers perform first, like Yule in his second run, they’re able to choose where they turn around each gate. As they do this, the pressure of their skis creates ruts in the snow. Anybody who follows is then, to an extent, forced into these ruts, and as they deepen, it becomes harder for subsequent skiers to follow lines that suit their own style.

…Europe experienced its second-warmest year on record in 2023, and the Alps are warming 2.5 times faster than the rest of the planet according to the European Environment Agency. According to an analysis published last year, the average temperature in the Alps has risen by 0.5ºC every decade over the past 30 years.

«

Warm-weather activities are also having to consider excessive temperatures during the summer.
unique link to this extract

Special report: Apple Inc. secures iWork.ai domain, a strategic move in the AI landscape • BuyAiDomains.com

Geoff Lyman:

»

we’ve uncovered that Apple Inc. has recently acquired the domain name iWork.ai. A WHOIS lookup confirmed Apple Inc., Cupertino, as the new owner, signaling a bold move by the tech behemoth.

Apple’s iWork suite, known for its seamless web-based services facilitating document sharing and collaboration, is on the brink of a revolutionary transformation. Originally launched as iWork.com in January 2009 and later phased out in 2012 in favor of iCloud, iWork’s pivot towards AI integration marks Apple’s foray into the competitive AI arena. This shift is not just a resurgence of a service but a strategic response to rivals like Microsoft, who have been leading in AI and business integrations:

«

I checked this, and a WHOIS on iwork.ai indeed shows it as being registered to Apple. Intriguing move: is Apple going to push an LLM into Pages, or Numbers, or Keynote? Any of them would make some sense. (For completeness, none of Numbers.ai, Pages.ai or Keynote.ai shows up at present as being registered to Apple. Though they are registered.)
unique link to this extract

A crowd destroyed a driverless Waymo car in San Francisco – The Verge

Wes Davis:

»

A person jumped on the hood of a Waymo driverless taxi and smashed its windshield in San Francisco’s Chinatown last night around 9PM PT, generating applause before a crowd formed around the car and covered it in spray paint, breaking its windows, and ultimately set it on fire. The fire department arrived minutes later, according to a report in The Autopian, but by then flames had already fully engulfed the car.

At the moment, no outlets seem to have reported a motive for the attack. Waymo representative Sandy Karp told The Verge via email that the fully autonomous car “was not transporting any riders” when it was attacked and fireworks were tossed inside the car, sparking the flames. Public Information Officer Robert Rueca of San Francisco’s police department confirmed in an email to The Verge that police responded at “approximately” 8:50PM PT to find the car already on fire, adding that there were “no reports of injuries.”

…The fire takes place against the backdrop of simmering tension between San Francisco residents and automated vehicle operators. The California DMV suspended Waymo rival Cruise’s robotaxi operations after one of its cars struck and dragged a pedestrian last year, and prior to that, automated taxis had caused chaos in the city, blocking traffic or crashing into a fire truck. Just last week, a Waymo car struck a cyclist who had reportedly been following behind a truck turning across its path.

«

Might be able to glimpse some semblance of a motive stemming from the latter event.
unique link to this extract

‘Our kids are suffering’: calls for ban on social media to protect under-16s • The Guardian

Heather Stewart:

»

Despite the acknowledged dangers, few experts and campaigners the Guardian spoke to believed an outright ban on social media use by under-16s was workable, or even desirable – though all are united in believing tech firms must do more.

“The people we really want to be taking responsibility for children being safe online are the tech companies,” said Rani Govender, the senior policy officer at the NSPCC.

“We completely recognise why so many parents and families are worried about this, but we think it keeps coming back to: how can we make these apps, these games, these sites, safer by design for children?”

She pointed to the importance of implementing requirements in the Online Safety Act for firms to take a tougher approach to enforcing minimum age limits for creating social media accounts, which are widely flouted.

The media regulator Ofcom is in the process of publishing codes of conduct that will set out in detail firms’ responsibilities on this and other issues.

…Just this week, academic research suggested the video-sharing app TikTok would serve up increasingly misogynistic content to boys who sought content about loneliness, or asked questions about masculinity.

…Andy Burrows is adviser to the Molly Rose Foundation, set up in Molly Russell’s memory to campaign for change. He warned against the temptation to shut off social media altogether for children who need to learn to navigate the online world.

“The idea of pulling up the drawbridge may seem a superficially attractive and easy solution, but I think it comes with potential unintended consequences, and in particular it risks delaying and perhaps even intensifying the risks that young people will face when they do go online,” he said.

«

unique link to this extract

“Wherever you get your podcasts” is a radical statement • Anil Dash

undefined:

»

here’s the thing: being able to say, “wherever you get your podcasts” is a radical statement. Because what it represents is the triumph of exactly the kind of technology that’s supposed to be impossible: open, empowering tech that’s not owned by any one company, that can’t be controlled by any one company, and that allows people to have ownership over their work and their relationship with their audience.

Podcasting as a technology grew out of the early era of the social web, when the norms of technology creators were that they were expected to create open systems, which interoperated with tools by other creators and even other companies. This was based on the successes of earlier generations of the internet, like email and even the web itself. Podcasting was basically the last such invention to become mainstream, with millions of people listening every day, and countless people able to create in the medium. And of course, it creates tons of oppportunities for businesses too, whether it’s people making amazing podcasts like Roman Mars does, or giants like Apple or Spotify building businesses around the medium.

Contrast this to other media formats online, like YouTube or Tiktok or Twitch, which don’t rely on open systems, and are wholly owned by individual tech companies. On those platforms, creators are constantly chasing the latest algorithmic shifts, and are subject to the whims of advertising algorithms that are completely opaque. If a creator gets fed up enough to want to leave a platform, they’re stuck — those viewers or listeners are tied to the company that hosts the content.

…What podcasting holds in the promise of its open format is the proof that an open web can still thrive and be relevant, that it can inspire new systems that are similarly open to take root and grow. Even the biggest companies in the world can’t displace these kinds of systems once they find their audiences. And that’s not to say that there aren’t shortcomings or problems with these systems, too. But, for example, when someone makes a podcast that’s about encouraging hate, there’s no one centralized system that can automatically suggest it to an audience and push them down a path of further radicalization.

«

unique link to this extract

200-foot radio station tower stolen without a trace in Alabama, silencing small town’s voice • Associated Press

»

The theft of a giant radio tower has silenced what used to be the voice of a small Alabama town and the surrounding county, the radio station’s general manager said.

A thief or thieves made off with the 200-foot (61-meter) tower, shutting down WJLX radio in Jasper, Alabama. So far, no arrests have been made.

“The slogan of our station is the sound of Walker County, and right now with our station down, the community has lost its sound and lost its voice,” WJLX General Manager Brett Elmore told The Associated Press. “This hurts, and it hurts our community.”

The theft was discovered Feb. 2, when a maintenance crew arrived in the wooded area where the tower once stood and found it gone. They also found that every piece of broadcasting equipment stored in a nearby building had also been stolen.

“To break into my building and steal all my equipment, and the tower?” Elmore said. “Hell, leave me the tower — that’s the most expensive thing to replace.”

Elmore said he suspects that the tower’s guy wire was cut first, which would have brought the structure to the ground. Then he believes it was cut into smaller pieces and hauled away. “Some pretty simple tools you could get from Home Depot could cut this up in no time,” he said.

The station had no insurance on the tower or the equipment, and he estimates that it will take $60,000 to $100,000 to rebuild. “We’re a small market, and we don’t have that kind of money,” he said.

«

It’s like an unpleasant future is here, but, happily, not evenly distributed.
unique link to this extract

Is the media prepared for an extinction-level event? • The New Yorker

Clare Malone:

»

One school of thought holds that outlets should focus largely on improving the user experience of their existing subscribers. Making a site’s home page more personalized is one example. The former L.A. Times executive likened it to what Netflix does for its customers; outlets could help people sift through reams of stories, and find the ones they’ll be most interested in. Of course, that kind of increased algorithmic discretion would raise journalistic alarm bells, particularly at newspapers, where the editorial judgment of what makes the front page is core to newsroom culture. The Times has recently pushed for shorter articles, which is meant to “meet our readers where they are”—as is, presumably, its rolling blog-like coverage of major events. These formats also dumb the product down a bit. Then again, it wasn’t so long ago that journalists doing ad reads on podcasts was uncharted territory. Norms change, particularly when business is bad. “Netflix spends a billion dollars in R. & D.,” the former executive told me, largely on data scientists, engineers, and designers who help users discover content they’ll love. Newsrooms might also need to approach the problem in a more methodical, tech-driven manner.

Which brings us back to the spectre of A.I. Large language models have trawled through the vast archives of sites and trained themselves not just on reported information but on the original work of critics and the pithy takes of bloggers. Aggregation can already be easily automated. A.I. might soon be able to write a decent movie review or a piece of compelling fiction, and cheaply animate companion graphics for a TV news segment; it can do a passing job of many of these tasks already. But AI won’t be able to report out a scoop. Reporting still has singular value if outlets can figure out the right way to wring it out.

«

The question of how the hell you make money from media is more and more urgent. Next link: how not to do it.
unique link to this extract

The Messenger, and why American media companies need better owners • The Washington Post

Erik Wemple:

»

behind-the-scenes tensions at the Messenger speak to complications in execution. “Jimmy [Finkelstein, the chief executive and founder of the Messenger] was spending time fuming and sort of tone-policing, what headlines would say, what the mix was on the homepage,” said Marc Caputo, a former member of the Messenger’s politics team, on a podcast with fellow former colleagues. “But you’re a businessman. Focus on the f—ing business!”

Former journalists at the Messenger tell me that Finkelstein was constantly pushing for this story or that story to be added to or removed from the homepage, usually in the interest of achieving the balance that was so key to the site’s identity. “One of his obsessions was the homepage and making sure it wasn’t too anti-Trump,” said one former reporter.

Another said this: “Jimmy’s idea of objective news is news without context.” And context is seldom friendly to former president Donald Trump. With any luck, the Messenger’s downfall will end the faux-visionary chatter about centrist news, an unattainable ideal that breaks down whenever its propagators are forced to identify what constitutes centrism. And as for the audience for down-the-middle news — sure, most people want unbiased coverage, but they also want free coverage. Who’s to say the non-paywalled site wasn’t just attracting extremist cheapskates?

An old pal of Trump’s, Finkelstein would often urge action on his political hobbyhorses, including the possibility that former first lady Michelle Obama would swoop in and secure the Democratic presidential nomination.

The Messenger’s rank-and-file staffers insist that they teamed up like an offensive line to block Finkelstein’s forays and prevent them from steering the site’s offerings. At least one of the founder’s blitzes broke through, however, as when a top editor directed colleagues last November not to allow any more coverage of Trump’s civil fraud trial in New York to “slip” onto the homepage. A spokesperson for the Messenger told the news site Semafor that the messages in question were being “misinterpreted.”

«

“An old pal of Trump’s”. In the literal and metaphorical sense: Finkelstein is 75, Trump 77. Wemple’s wider point, that there are some crummy media owners in the US, might not be news, but it’s a problem.
unique link to this extract

The Norwegian sovereign wealth fund’s $92mn Excel error • FT Alphaville

Robin Wigglestowrth:

»

Here’s an NBIM employee called “Simon” recounting the debacle to the report’s author, Tone Danielsen. Alphaville’s emphasis below:

»

Last year (spring 2022) we had an off-site. One of our workshops was on “Mistakes and how to deal with them”. We wrote post-it notes, classifying them into different categories from harmless to no-goes. One of my post-it notes, I remember it vividly, read: Miscalculation of the Ministry of Finance benchmark. I placed it in the category unforgivable.

When I wrote that note, I honestly couldn’t even dare to think about the consequences . . . And less than a year later, I did exactly that. My worst nightmare. It was a manual mistake. My mistake. I used the wrong date, December 1st instead of November 1st which is clearly stated in our mandate.

The mistake was not revealed until months later, by the Ministry of Finance. They reported back that the numbers did not add up. I did all the numbers once more, and the cause of the mistake was identified. I immediately reported to Patrick [Global Head] and Dag [Chief]. I openly express that this was my mistake, and mine alone. I felt miserable and was ready to take the consequences — whatever they might be.

«

We’ve all made Excel mistakes – the report only references “gigantic spreadsheets”, which we assume has to mean Microsoft’s finest product – but this must surely be the most consequential misdated cell in history.

«

Misdated cell, sure, but there have ben some pretty consequential errors around Excel renaming genes.
unique link to this extract

How to cut glass underwater with scissors: the Rehbinder effect explained • HotDailys

Abigail Smith:

»

The Rehbinder effect, named after the Soviet chemist Pavel Rehbinder, is the reduction of the strength and cohesion of solid materials when they are in contact with certain liquids or gases. This effect occurs because the liquid or gas molecules adsorb onto the surface of the solid, creating a thin layer that lowers the surface energy and the interatomic bonds. As a result, the solid becomes more brittle and easier to fracture.

One of the most striking demonstrations of the Rehbinder effect is cutting glass underwater with a scissors. Glass is normally a very hard and strong material, but when it is submerged in water, it becomes much weaker and more susceptible to cracking. This is because water molecules adhere to the glass surface, weakening the bonds between the glass atoms. By applying a small force with a scissors, one can create a crack that propagates through the glass, cutting it into pieces.

The Rehbinder effect is not limited to glass and water, but can occur with various combinations of solids and liquids or gases. For example, metals can be cut with a knife when they are immersed in mercury, and rocks can be broken with a hammer when they are wetted with ethanol. The Rehbinder effect can also be influenced by factors such as temperature, pressure, pH, and electric fields.

The effect has fantastic practical implications for various fields of science and engineering. For example, it can be used to improve the machining and processing of materials, like cutting, drilling, and polishing. It can also help control the fracture and failure of materials, by preventing cracks from spreading or inducing cracks for controlled demolition. Additionally, the Rehbinder effect can be used to alter the properties and functions of materials, such as changing electrical conductivity, optical transparency, or magnetic behavior.

«

I was today years old when I came across this, and if you knew it earlier then I’m impressed.
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

In Chernobyl, wolves (close relatives of dogs) seem to have developed altered immune systems to resist cancer – which could help humans, in time. CC-licensed photo by Surreal Name Given on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

It’s Friday, so there’s another post due at the Social Warming Substack at about 0845 UK time.

A selection of 10 links for you. Not eleven?! I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. Observations and links welcome.

Mutant Chernobyl wolves evolve anti-cancer abilities 35 years after nuclear disaster • Newswise

»

In 1986, a nuclear reactor at the Chernobyl power plant exploded, releasing cancer-causing radiation and irradiated debris into the environment, and resulting in the world’s worst nuclear accident. The Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ) is a 1000 square mile parcel of the surrounding area chronically exposed to radiation and abandoned by people. Yet wildlife like horses, wolves, forests, and fungi have recolonized. Cara Love, an evolutionary biologist and ecotoxicologist in Shane Campbell-Staton’s lab at Princeton University, has combined her passion for conservation and nature-based solutions to study how the wolves of Chernobyl survive and thrive despite generations of exposure and the accumulation of radioactive particles in their bodies.

In 2014, Love and colleagues went to the CEZ, radio-collared wolves, and took blood to understand the wolves’ responses to cancer-causing radiation. Using these specialty GPS collars armed with radiation dosimeters, “we get real time measurements of where they are and how much [radiation] they are exposed to,” said Love. They discovered that Chernobyl wolves are exposed to upwards of 11.28 millirem of radiation everyday for their entire lives, over six times the legal safety limit for the average human worker.

Unlike wolves living exclusively outside the CEZ, Love found that Chernobyl wolves have altered immune systems, similar to cancer patients undergoing radiation treatment. And most promising, she has identified specific regions of the wolf genome that seem resilient to increased cancer risk. Most human research has found mutations increasing cancer risk (like BRCA does with breast cancer), but Love’s work hopes to identify protective mutations that increase the odds of surviving cancer. It seems even Fido’s family has new tricks to teach.

«

Most useful because domestic dogs develop and fight cancer more like humans than lab mice do, making them a better source. Canis lupus, the gray wolf, is a near relative.
unique link to this extract

World’s first year-long breach of key 1.5ºC warming limit • BBC News

Mark Poynting:

»

For the first time, global warming has exceeded 1.5ºC across an entire year, according to the EU’s climate service.

World leaders promised in 2015 to try to limit the long-term temperature rise to 1.5ºC, which is seen as crucial to help avoid the most damaging impacts. This first year-long breach doesn’t break that landmark Paris agreement, but it does bring the world closer to doing so in the long-term.

Urgent action to cut carbon emissions can still slow warming, scientists say. “This far exceeds anything that is acceptable,” Prof Sir Bob Watson, a former chair of the UN’s climate body, told the BBC Radio 4’s Today Programme. “Look what’s happened this past year with only 1.5ºC – we’ve seen floods, we’ve seen droughts, we’ve seen heatwaves and wildfires all over the world.”

The period from February 2023 to January 2024 reached 1.52ºC of warming, according to the EU’s Copernicus Climate Change Service.

The latest climate warning comes amid news that the Labour Party is ditching its policy of spending £28bn a year on its green investment plan in a major U-turn. The Conservatives also pushed back on some key targets in September.

This means the UK’s two main parties have scaled back the type of pledges that many climate scientists say are needed globally if the worst impacts of warming are to be avoided.

«

The 1.5ºC breach was only a matter of time – turns out to have come sooner rather than later – but the lamentable retreat by the Labour party is going to impress nobody: not its core voters (who wanted it), or floating voters (who would probably see it as necessary, especially if you could sell it as “insulation for your home to reduce your energy bills”).

How long before the 2ºC year? A decade? Less? Brace yourself.
unique link to this extract

The number of monarch butterflies at their Mexico wintering sites has plummeted this year • Phys.org

Mark Stevenson:

»

The number of monarch butterflies at their wintering areas in Mexico dropped by 59% this year to the second lowest level since record keeping began, experts said Wednesday, blaming heat, drought and loss of habitat.

The butterflies’ migration from Canada and the United States to Mexico and back again is considered a marvel of nature. No single butterfly lives to complete the entire journey.

The annual butterfly count doesn’t calculate the individual number of butterflies, but rather the number of acres they cover when they clump together on tree branches in the mountain pine and fir forests west of Mexico City. Monarchs from east of the Rocky Mountains in the United States and Canada overwinter there.

Mexico’s Commission for National Protected Areas said the butterflies covered an area equivalent to 2.2 acres (0.9 hectares), down from 5.4 acres (2.21 hectares) last year.

The lowest level was in 2013 at 1.65 acres (0.67 hectares).

Experts said heat and drought appeared to be the main culprits in this year’s drought.

“It has a lot to do with climate change,” said Gloria Tavera, the commission’s conservation director.

Experts noted there were almost no butterflies at some traditional wintering grounds, because the monarchs appeared to have moved to higher, cooler mountain tops nearby. About two-thirds of the butterflies counted this year were found outside the traditional reserves.

“The monarchs looked for other sites … they are looking for lower temperatures,” Tavera said. Because some of the newer wintering sites aren’t included in the population count, there may have been more monarchs this year than the numbers suggest.

But the number of a smaller population, the western monarch butterflies that overwinter in California, has dropped, too.

«

Everything is connected. Is there the same amount of food up in the mountain tops as there was in the mountain pines?
unique link to this extract

Dark mode v light mode preferences by region, gender, politics, age and social grade • YouGov

Fascinating result: what is it about turning 25 that makes people realise dark mode is bad, do you think? (Amusingly the tweet from YouGov uses an image in dark mode.)

unique link to this extract

Apple is developing foldable clamshell iPhones, reports The Information • Reuters

»

Apple is building prototypes of at least two iPhones that fold widthwise like a clamshell, The Information reported on Wednesday, citing a person with direct knowledge of the situation.

The foldable iPhones are in early development and are not on the company’s mass production plans for 2024 or 2025, according to the report.

Apple recently approached at least one manufacturer in Asia for components related to two foldable iPhones of different sizes, the report said.

«

It would be amazing if Apple weren’t trying out prototypes of folding phones, but they’re really not the sort of thing you should expect to see in a year, or even two. Foldables are about 1% of smartphone sales (and hence about 0.2% of the installed base), and will stay there unless Apple jumps in.

Notable though that The Information is specific about it being a widthways fold – which means like a flip phone, if I’m interpreting it correctly, rather than lengthways which would be like a phone that folds out into a tablet.
unique link to this extract

China on cusp of next-generation chip production despite US curbs • FT

Qianer Lu:

»

China’s national chip champions expect to make next-generation smartphone processors as early as this year, despite US efforts to restrict their development of advanced technologies.

The country’s biggest chipmaker SMIC has put together new semiconductor production lines in Shanghai, according to two people familiar with the move, to mass produce the chips designed by technology giant Huawei.

That plan supports Beijing’s goals of chip self-sufficiency, with President Joe Biden’s administration tightening export restrictions for advanced chipmaking equipment in October, citing national security concerns. The US has also been working with the Netherlands and Japan to block China’s access to the latest chip tools, such as machines from the Dutch maker ASML.

According to two people with knowledge of the plans, SMIC is aiming to use its existing stock of US and Dutch-made equipment to produce more-miniaturised 5-nanometre chips. The production line will make Kirin chips designed by Huawei’s HiSilicon unit and destined for new versions of its premium smartphones.

While 5nm chips remain a generation behind the current cutting-edge 3nm ones, the move would show China’s semiconductor industry is still making gradual progress, despite US export controls.

“With the new 5nm node, Huawei is well on track to upgrade its new flagship handset and data centre chips,” said one person familiar with the plans.

Huawei had surprised the industry and analysts with its advances when its Mate 60 Pro premium smartphone launched in August featuring a 7nm processor. The phone helped it to increase shipments in China by nearly 50% in the fourth quarter, according to Canalys research, as it proved a big hit with consumers.

«

5nm will probably suffice for a few years yet, though SMIC’s/China’s real problem here is volume: it’s all well and good producing enough for Huawei, but can it make enough chips to satisfy every Chinese smartphone maker if, by some ill fortune (or American manoeuvring) it gets cut off from TSMC’s output?
unique link to this extract

Wearing Apple Vision Pro with glasses works, but it’s risky • UploadVR

Kyle Riesenbeck:

»

For purchase on top of the $3,500 headset, UploadVR and everyone else has been told that the only option is to buy the Zeiss-branded corrective lens inserts. This is Apple’s policy, and all of their documentation echoes this requirement.

When I eventually found myself alone with a Vision Pro, though, without the forbidding gaze of an Apple employee or anyone to tell me to stop, I tried the headset with my glasses on.

It seemed to work. It was a very snug fit with my current style of glasses, but I was able to get the headset on with my glasses firmly pressed against my face and the distance between my own lenses and the Vision Pro’s millimeters from collision. I watched as the green outlines inside Apple Vision Pro adjusted to my eyes and set up eye tracking. I had a reduced field of view as with every other VR headset I’d worn.

After I removed the headset, cleaned my smudged glasses, and put Vision Pro back on, I noticed that I did have to adjust everything a bit to get back into proper calibration. As has been my experience with every other headset, The Apple Vision Pro can be used while wearing my own glasses, though I didn’t use the headset long enough to see the impact of my glasses to Apple’s eye-tracked distortion correction.

So why even bother trying this? Apple Vision Pro isn’t a several hundred dollar headset. It’s a multi-thousand dollar headset. The gamble of scratching the lenses on such an expensive piece of hardware increases tenfold when you cram your own glasses into it. Apple’s warranty notes that it doest not apply “to damage caused by operating the Apple Product outside Apple’s published guidelines” and AppleCare+ warns it will not repair any damage caused by “abnormal or improper use”. AppleCare+ is available for the Vision Pro for $499 for two years as a supplement to the one year limited warranty. Even if AppleCare+ covered it, a repair would still cost you $299.

The Zeiss corrective inserts start at $100 and are a logical choice for your own personal device. You have to ask yourself if the costly risk of wearing your own glasses is a smarter choice than spending $150 for a pair of removable prescription inserts.

«

TL;DR I tried it but ehh not really worthwhile, so now you don’t have to ask.
unique link to this extract

Google’s Gemini AI now has a new app and works across Google products • The Verge

David Pierce on the renaming of “Bard” to “Gemini”:

»

Gemini’s mobile apps will likely be the place most people encounter the new tool. If you download the new app on Android, it can set Gemini as your default assistant, meaning it replaces Google Assistant as the thing that responds when you say, “Hey Google” or long-press your home button.

So far, it doesn’t seem Google is getting rid of Assistant entirely, but the company has been deprioritizing Assistant for a while now, and it clearly believes Gemini is the future. “I think it’s a super important first step towards building a true AI assistant,” says Sissie Hsiao, who runs Bard (now Gemini) at Google. “One that is conversational, it’s multimodal, and it’s more helpful than ever before.” 

There’s no dedicated Gemini app for iOS (and you can’t set a non-Siri assistant as the default anyway), but you’ll be able to access all the AI features in the Google app. And just to give you a sense of how important Gemini is to Google: there’s going to be a toggle at the top of the app that lets you switch from Search to Gemini. For the entirety of Google’s existence, Search has been the most important product by a mile; it’s beginning to signal that Gemini might matter just as much. (For now, by the way, Google’s in-search AI is still called Search Generative Experience, but it’s probably safe to bet that’ll be Gemini eventually, too.)

The other changes to Gemini are mostly just branding. Google is ditching the Bard name, but otherwise its chatbot will feel the way it has previously

«

Given that most searches are now done on mobile, the decision to do this on mobile first is quite telling. Google is all in on this.
unique link to this extract

Why is the $180bn games industry shedding thousands of staff? • The Guardian

Keith Stuart:

»

During lockdown, there was an explosion of interest in video games. The effect was twofold: strong sales for titles such as Animal Crossing and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare boosted revenue and sent share prices soaring, thereby attracting the attention of external investors who flooded the industry with funds. In response, hubristic publishers commissioned more ambitious projects, hiring accordingly.

But the bubble didn’t last. With lockdowns easing, sales fell as people got on with their lives. “We’ve seen a number of games cancelled in recent months. I imagine a lot more were cancelled that we don’t know about,” says [editor-in-chief of gameindustry.biz, James] Batchelor. “If you’re cancelling a project and focusing on a handful of games that you know are going to do well for your studio, unfortunately that puts jobs at risk for the people attached to those projects that are getting scrapped.”

Colin Macdonald is a veteran game developer and now director of Games Jobs Live, an industry recruitment platform. He sees a combination of three key factors behind many of the job losses: revenue projection corrections, raised interest rates and high inflation. “These three themselves are linked,” he says. “While many of the revenue projection corrections came from the delayed realisation that the Covid bubble was just a bubble, recent inflation levels have outstripped industry growth (and pushed costs up), as well as forcing interest rate increases, which put pressure on everyone accustomed to the financing available when more traditional forms of investment weren’t providing good returns.”

«

Easy to think of the pandemic as being well in the rear view mirror, but the whiplash continues, along with the effects (perhaps bigger) of the end of zero interest rates.
unique link to this extract

Android users in Singapore to be blocked from installing unverified apps • The Straits Times

Osmond Chia:

»

Android users here will be blocked from installing apps from unverified sources, a process called sideloading, as part of a new trial by Google to crack down on malware scams.

The security tool will work in the background to detect apps that demand suspicious permissions, like those that grant the ability to spy on screen content or read SMS messages, which scammers have been known to abuse to intercept one-time passwords.

Singapore is the first country to begin the gradual roll-out of the security feature over the next few weeks, done in collaboration with the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore, according to a statement on Feb 7 by Google, which develops the Android software.

The update will progressively arrive on all Android users’ devices and will be enabled by default through Google Play Protect, said Google’s director of android security strategy Eugene Liderman…

…Sideloaded apps can come in the form of apps used by overseas businesses that do not use the Google ecosystem, to device customisation tools and free versions of paid apps. But users have also been tricked into installing apps that allow fraudsters to spy on their devices and enter their bank accounts.

In a malware scam, victims are typically directed to download an Android package kit file through such websites or messaging apps to receive gifts or deals. This was the mode of operations employed in major malware scam campaigns to hijack victims’ devices and steal their money.

More than 1,400 victims fell prey to malware scams between January and August, with total losses amounting to at least $20.6m, the police said.

«

Somewhere in Apple’s headquarters someone is printing out this story and putting it into the growing folder called “yeah we warned you European Union with your Digital Markets Act stuff but would you listen? Would you?”
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

The Moon is shrinking. Should you be worried? If you’re an astronaut looking to land there, then perhaps yes. CC-licensed photo by Sara Hathaway on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

There’s another post coming this week at the Social Warming Substack on Friday at 0845 UK time. Free signup.

A selection of 10 links for you. It’s up there. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. Observations and links welcome.

TikTok is full of made-up slang and trendbait • Vox

Rebecca Jennings:

»

Right now, language is exploding on TikTok. It is kind of beautiful until you understand why. With every scroll, new terms compete for space in your brain: “orange peel theory,” “microcheating,” “girl hobby,” “loud budgeting,” “75 cozy.” They are funneled into the collective consciousness not because they are relevant or necessary but because random people have made videos inventing these terms in the hope that the wording will go viral. The other day, I saw one where a guy was like, “Does anyone else just love a ‘dinner and couch’ friend? Like, you just have dinner and then you sit on the couch?” The video currently has more than 100,000 likes and 600 comments. He then repeats the term as if to drill into the audience that this is a phenomenon that deserves its own designation: “dinner and couch friend.” Fascinating!

There is a case to be made that the constant stream of phrases vying to become widely used slang exemplifies a deep appreciation for language among the extremely online, or a desire to connect over the intricacies of the human experience. Perhaps you, too, can relate to the concept of “polywork” (that is, working multiple jobs) or having been raised by a diet-obsessive “almond mom.” Maybe this guy’s video coining the term “weekend effect” to describe the feeling of wasting your Saturdays and Sundays really speaks to you; maybe “first time cool syndrome” is something you’ve personally overcome.

But chances are, either you have never heard of any of these terms or you have heard of so many that you are starting to become a little bit fatigued by them. It is not novel to note that TikTok has sped up the trend cycle, creating incentives for users to remix or react to the latest viral video and forget about it once it’s no longer a reliable source of views. What this has wrought is a graveyard of microtrends and niche aesthetics for people to try on, care about only to the extent that they generate attention, and then discard for the next thing (who even talks about “e-girls” or “goblin mode” anymore?). And over the past few years, TikTokers have clamoured to coin the next new trend.

«

The internet accelerating language? Predictable enough, I suppose.

unique link to this extract

Platformer’s Casey Newton on leaving Substack and surviving the great media collapse • The Verge

Nilay Patel interviews Newton, who has a three-person team (including himself):

»

As somebody who’s very nervous about the state of media, I would like to get a lot more money in the bank. I don’t think most media businesses work by wanting to have someone’s entire salary in the bank before they hire them, but that’s basically how I think about it. I do think that we could get there with Platformer this year, but I’m trying to spend a lot of time thinking about, “Okay, well, what does it mean when that person shows up? What do I actually want them to contribute to the business?” One of the amazing things about hiring Zoe was that she joined right when Elon [Musk] was buying Twitter. She broke and helped me to break a bunch of stories about that takeover, and that generated hundreds and hundreds of new subscriptions for us at Platformer. And for a very tiny media company, that is important that the people that you are hiring are creating the conditions for you to be able to continue paying them.

I understand why a lot of reporters don’t want to be in that position. I think you and I both wanted to live in a world where reporters could just roam free, write whatever they wanted, and it would all just work out in the end. And I think for a long time, it did. I think we’re now in this worse world, where, in order for the media businesses to work, whatever you’re reporting and writing, somebody has to want to pay you $10 a month or $100 a year to read it. So I’m happy with the state of things for us, but I also acknowledge this is not the ideal state of tech media.

«

unique link to this extract

Why scientists are starting to worry about the moon shrinking • The Washington Post

Kasha Patel:

»

“A concept that I think that many people have is that the moon is this geologically dead body, that something on the moon never changes,” said lunar geologist Tom Watters. But “the moon is a seismically active body.”

Studies of moonquakes date back to the Apollo era. More than 50 years ago, astronauts placed seismometers around the near side of the moon’s surface to record trembles. The most powerful shallow quake was located near the south pole, which is near landing spots for NASA’s Artemis III mission to send people back to the moon, potentially in 2027. The lunar south pole region is enticing because it contains permanently shadowed regions that some speculate could have water-based ice.

In a new study, Watters and his colleagues state that this powerful quake is tied to a group of currently seismically active faults, which were created as the moon has shrunk. Quakes in the area could trigger landslides from loose rocks and dust from surrounding craters, according to models.

Other researchers say we still don’t have enough information to determine hazardous places to land on the moon.

The moon’s shrinking has been measurable, but small. It has contracted about 150 feet in diameter over the last few hundred million years. Much of the shrinking is driven by natural cooling of our moon’s molten core. As the core cools, the moon’s surface contracts and adjusts to the change in volume. As it shrank, portions of the crust pushed together to form ridges known as thrust faults.

«

OK, I thought I ought to be worried about the shrinking moon, but now I’m not.
unique link to this extract

Scientist discovers fake peer reviewing of scientific articles • Observant Online

Maurice Timmermans:

»

For journals, who set up the peer reviews, it is not easy to find reviewers. It takes time and many scientists would prefer to work on their own research than assessing other people’s articles. That is why journals often ask the author to come up with suitable candidates.

Bouter: “That may sound strange, but researchers know their own field of specialisation best. They also know who is knowledgeable in their subject field. At the same time, a lot can go wrong.”

It is true that some authors give the names of colleagues – sometimes heavyweights – but they don’t always add their real e-mail addresses, but made-up ones. The review request from the journal never reaches the colleague, but appears in the author’s inbox. Who subsequently writes a glowing assessment of his own work.

It also happens that researchers write fake reviews in which they emphatically advise the author to include in the manuscript references to articles written by the reviewer. That appears to be the case in the abuse exposed by the Spanish professor Angeles Oviedo-Garcia. She discovered a total of 85 articles in which a group of ten scientists (from five universities) reviewed manuscripts in order to inflate the number of references to their own works. The more references to your publications, the greater your prestige as a scientist.

The reviews themselves carried little weight and were filled with standard texts, in which reviewers (and possibly also ChatGPT) make empty suggestions about paragraphs being too long or too detailed. Bouter: “It reminds me of something we have known for quite some time: citation cartels. Here too, scientists agreed to refer to each other’s articles. Except that this was not always accompanied by fake reviews.” 

«

Make something – such as getting scientific research published – a KPI (key performance indicator) and people will game it.
unique link to this extract

Fake research papers flagged by analysing authorship trends • Nature

Dalmeet Singh Chawla:

»

Paper mills are a growing problem for publishers — according to one estimate, around 2% of all published papers in 2022 resembled studies produced by paper mills — and in recent years publishers have stepped up efforts to tackle them.

As well as being of poor quality, often containing made-up data and nonsensical text, the articles that paper mills churn out are frequently padded with researchers who buy authorship on manuscripts already accepted for publication. Some paper mills claim to have brokered tens of thousands of authorships — including in journals that are indexed in respected databases, such as Web of Science and Scopus.

This can create unusual patterns of co-authorship and networks of researchers that are different from those in legitimate research, says Simon Porter, vice-president for research futures at Digital Science.

Under normal circumstances, “you would expect to find behaviour where a young researcher is publishing with their supervisor, and starts to branch out a little later and publish with other people”, Porter says. “You can see an evolution; it’s not a random network.”

This is not the case with paper-mill works. The technology that Porter and his colleagues developed searches for trends that indicate paper-mill activity. These include co-author networks composed of early-career researchers who suddenly have a spike in publications, and papers featuring several authors who have no publication history or a collection of collaborators who are unlikely to have worked together, such as authors from several locations or unrelated disciplines.

When they compared the new technique’s results with those of the Problematic Paper Screener, a tool that searches for tortured phrases and other red flags, Porter and colleagues identified a significant overlap. Around 10% of authors were directly flagged by both tools, their study found, and 72% of authors in the ‘author networks’ data set can be linked through co-authorship to those in the ‘tortured phrases’ data set.

«

Another version of “make something a KPI, and people will distort their behaviour to game it.”
unique link to this extract

Judge rules against users suing Google and Apple over “annoying” search results • Ars Technica

Ashley Belanger:

»

Users had argued that Google struck a deal making its search engine the default on Apple’s Safari web browser specifically to keep Apple from competing in the general search market. These payments to Apple, users alleged, have “stunted innovation” and “deprived” users of “quality, service, and privacy that they otherwise would have enjoyed but for Google’s anticompetitive conduct.” They also allege that it created a world where users have fewer choices, enabling Google to prefer its own advertisers, which users said caused an “annoying and damaging distortion” of search results.

In an order granting the tech companies’ motion to dismiss, US District Judge Rita Lin said that users did not present enough evidence to support claims for relief. Lin dismissed some claims with prejudice but gave leave to amend others, allowing users another chance to keep their case—now twice-dismissed—at least partially alive.

Under Lin’s order, users will not be able to amend claims that Google and Apple executives allegedly sealed the default search deal on the condition that Apple would not create its own general search engine through “private, secret, and clandestine personal meetings.” Because plaintiffs showed no evidence pinpointing exactly when Apple allegedly agreed to stay out of the general search market, these meetings, Lin reasoned, could just as easily indicate “rational, legal business behavior,” rather than an “illegal conspiracy.”

Users attempted to argue that Google and Apple intentionally hid these facts from the public, but Lin wrote that their “conclusory and vague allegations that defendants ‘secretly conducted meetings’ and ‘engaged in conduct to obfuscate internal communications’ are plainly insufficient.”

«

The complaint is pretty weak sauce. It claims that “Apple was a major potential threat to Google” in search and that Google paid and pays its billions for default search placement to keep Apple out of that space. This seems unlikely; Apple thought that making its own maps was worthwhile, but that consumes vast (but, to Apple, tolerable) amounts of money. Search would cost far more, and gain what?
unique link to this extract

Microsoft’s recent layoffs contradict what the company promised of its merger, says FTC • The Verge

Lauren Feiner:

»

Microsoft’s recent layoffs contradict what the company promised of its merger, the FTC says.The Federal Trade Commission complained to a federal appeals court on Wednesday that Microsoft’s layoff of 1,900 employees in its video games division went against its representations in court as it fought to acquire Activision Blizzard.

The move undermines Microsoft’s claims that the companies would continue to operate independently, the FTC said, and will make it harder to get “effective relief” if the agency succeeds in its administrative proceeding.

«

Well exactly. “We’re not going to lay people off! They’ll operate independently!” *Takes over company, fires loads of people* “What’s wrong??”
unique link to this extract

Kara Swisher: how Silicon Valley tech bros ruined media • NY Mag

Kara Swisher:

»

In 1995, a quirky programmer in San Francisco named Craig Newmark started emailing friends a list of local events, job opportunities, and things for sale. The next year, he turned Craigslist into a web-based service and eventually started expanding it all over the country and the world.

It was clear this list was a giant killer, and I told everyone who would listen to me at the Post that we needed to put all the money, all the people, and all the incentives into digital. I insisted that the bosses had to make readers feel like digital was the most important thing. But the bosses never did because the business they knew was the physical paper. I relayed my worries about the turtle pace of digital change many times to the Washington Post Company’s affable CEO, Don Graham, the son of legendary publisher and surprisingly entertaining badass Katharine Graham. Don Graham was inexplicably humble and even sheepish about his power. The very worst thing that Graham — always apologetic for having interrupted me, as I strafed big retail advertisers in my stories about the sector’s decline locally — would say to me was “Ouch.” Then he would saunter away from my desk with a jaunty wave. And while Graham was interested when I talked about what Newmark was doing, he laughed when I told him that Craigslist would wipe out his classifieds business.

“You charge too much, the customer service sucks, it’s static, and most of all, it doesn’t work,” I lectured him about this business, which was crucial to his bottom line. “It will disappear as an analog product, since it is a perfect target for digital destruction. You’re going to die by the cell and not even know it until it’s over and you’re dead on the ground.”

Don smiled at me with a kindness I certainly did not deserve at that moment. “Ouch,” he said.

«

As Swisher points out, other journalists not in tech were dismissive of this new space: “I guess you’ll be covering CB radio,” one media reporter says to her. (From Swisher’s forthcoming book “Burn Book”.)
unique link to this extract

The Messenger shut down: behind Jimmy Finkelstein’s site’s implosion • The Hollywood Reporter

Lachlan Cartwright:

»

Less than a year after making wild predictions of generating $100m in revenue by attracting 100 million readers with a newsroom of 550 journalists, The Messenger has crashed and burned in spectacular fashion, leaving in its wake 300 staffers tossed to the media scrapheap without severance or health insurance in a failure that marks the end of the splashy media startup era. The money owed to freelancers and vendors is expected to balloon out to seven figures, The Hollywood Reporter has learned.

…On the business side, [Finkelstein] linked back up with former Condé Nast Media Group president Richard Beckman, who had been president of The Hill before Finkelstein sold it to Nexstar for $130m in 2021, and who was given the nickname “Mad Dog” by former Condé Nast CEO Steve Florio, due to his hard-charging — and at times out of control — nature.

…Condé Nast was forced to pay a reported multimillion-dollar settlement after Beckman, as a joke, tried to force two female employees to kiss, slamming one woman’s head into the other’s forehead and leaving one executive with a broken nose.

…Former staffers tell THR that Beckman displayed a complete lack of understanding about digital media and showed little interest in learning or taking input from the team of talented staff he hired. Worse still, those that worked with him say he was stuck in a bygone era, circa Condé Nast in the 1990s, believing he could secure million-dollar deals from advertisers. “If you were trying to comment on something or tell him something, he would cut you off and say, ‘Do not open your mouth, I don’t wanna hear it’ and then go on long tirades about his brilliance,” another former staffer says.

Ultimately, Beckman and Finkelstein, who were both paying themselves seven-figure salaries and spent big on multiple offices in three cities, failed to generate revenue streams or communicate a coherent business strategy to staff. Just how do you monetise commodity news that at times appeared to be a poor man’s Daily Mail online, without the sexy photos and sidebar of shame?

«

Toxic people. And yet, despite all their hubris, one suspects they will somehow appear again, with other people’s money in their pockets, on a stage proclaiming a new venture.
unique link to this extract

Holes appear in internet-connected toothbrush botnet warning • Data Breach Today

Mathew Schwartz:

»

The viral story originated in Swiss German-language daily newspaper Luzerner Zeitung. On Jan. 30, the paper set this scene: A woman blissfully brushes away, oblivious to the fact that her internet-connected toothbrush has been infected with malware, making it moonlight as one of millions of other toothbrushes controlled by a botnet, which the toothbrushes collectively harness to bring the website of an unsuspecting Swiss firm to its digital knees.

The story – as machine-translated by Google – claims “this actually happened” and quotes Switzerland-based Stefan Züger, Fortinet’s director of systems engineering, as saying: “Every device that is connected to the internet is a potential target – or can be misused for an attack.”

The report arrives on the heels of high-profile nuisance attacks against Switzerland’s federal government, based in Bern. The attacks last month were apparently timed to coincide with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s attendance at the annual World Economic Forum meeting in Davos.

The self-proclaimed Russian hacktivist group NoName057(16), aka NoName, claimed credit for the DDoS attacks, which the Luzerner Zeitung report referenced.

Whether or not a single smart toothbrush has ever been remotely compromised – never mind three million of them – remains to be seen, especially since no such devices appear to be designed to directly connect to the internet.

But NoName, which closely aligns itself with Moscow and may be run by Russia’s intelligence apparatus – is not letting the dust settle on this dental drama. British cybersecurity expert Kevin Beaumont spotted the group asking its followers via Telegram: “Who infected thousands of ‘smart’ toothbrushes with our software?”

The smart money answer remains: No one. “It takes 2 seconds to peel back the story to see if there’s anything reasonable there. There isn’t,” tweeted offensive security engineer Robert Graham.

«

I did look at the original story to try to check its veracity, but didn’t spot anything telling. Say ahhhhh. (H/t Mathew S. Yup, him.)
unique link to this extract

Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified