
The monk Gregor Mendel didn’t just work on inheritance; he also recorded weather. But much of his work is lost. CC-licensed photo by Russell McNeil on Flickr.
You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.
A selection of 9 links for you. Papered over. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. On Bluesky: @charlesarthur.bsky.social. Observations and links welcome.
The age of anti-social media is here • The Atlantic
Damon Beres:
»
Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, X, Reddit—all have aggressively put AI chatbots in front of users. On the podcast, Zuckerberg said that AI probably won’t “replace in-person connections or real-life connections”—at least not right away. Yet he also spoke of the potential for AI therapists and girlfriends to be embodied in virtual space; of Meta’s desire—he couldn’t seem to help himself from saying—to produce “always-on videochat” with an AI that looks, gestures, smiles, and sounds like a real person.
Meta is working to make that desire a reality. And it is hardly leading the charge: Many companies are doing the same, and many people already use AI for companionship, sexual gratification, mental-health care.
What Zuckerberg described—what is now unfolding—is the beginning of a new digital era, more actively anti-social than the last. Generative AI will automate a large number of jobs, removing people from the workplace. But it will almost certainly sap humanity from the social sphere as well. Over years of use—and product upgrades—many of us may simply slip into relationships with bots that we first used as helpers or entertainment, just as we were lulled into submission by algorithmic feeds and the glow of the smartphone screen. This seems likely to change our society at least as much as the social media era has.
…According to Zuckerberg, one of the main things people use Meta AI for today is advice about difficult conversations with bosses or loved ones—what to say, what responses to anticipate. Recently, MIT Technology Review reported on therapists who are taking things further, surreptitiously feeding their dialogue with their patients into ChatGPT during therapy sessions for ideas on how to reply.
The former activity can be useful; the latter is a clear betrayal. Yet the line between them is a little less distinct than it first appears. Among other things, bots may lead some people to outsource their efforts to truly understand others, in a way that may ultimately degrade them—to say nothing of the communities they inhabit.
«
(Gift link.)
unique link to this extract
Internet Archive’s legal fights are over, but its founder mourns what was lost • Ars Technica
Ashely Belanger:
»
Last month, the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine archived its trillionth webpage, and the nonprofit invited its more than 1,200 library partners and 800,000 daily users to join a celebration of the moment. To honor “three decades of safeguarding the world’s online heritage,” the city of San Francisco declared October 22 to be “Internet Archive Day.” The Archive was also recently designated a federal depository library by Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), who proclaimed the organization a “perfect fit” to expand “access to federal government publications amid an increasingly digital landscape.”
The Internet Archive might sound like a thriving organization, but it only recently emerged from years of bruising copyright battles that threatened to bankrupt the beloved library project. In the end, the fight led to more than 500,000 books being removed from the Archive’s “Open Library.”
“We survived,” Internet Archive founder Brewster Kahle told Ars. “But it wiped out the Library.”
An Internet Archive spokesperson confirmed to Ars that the archive currently faces no major lawsuits and no active threats to its collections. Kahle thinks “the world became stupider” when the Open Library was gutted—but he’s moving forward with new ideas.
Kahle has been striving since 1996 to transform the Internet Archive into a digital Library of Alexandria—but “with a better fire protection plan,” joked Kyle Courtney, a copyright lawyer and librarian who leads the nonprofit eBook Study Group, which helps states update laws to protect libraries.
When the Wayback Machine was born in 2001 as a way to take snapshots of the web, Kahle told The New York Times that building free archives was “worth it.” He was also excited that the Wayback Machine had drawn renewed media attention to libraries.
At the time, law professor Lawrence Lessig predicted that the Internet Archive would face copyright battles, but he also believed that the Wayback Machine would change the way the public understood copyright fights.
”We finally have a clear and tangible example of what’s at stake,” Lessig told the Times.
«
Return of Chinese astronauts delayed after spacecraft struck by debris • The Guardian
Helen Davidson:
»
The return to Earth of three Chinese astronauts has been delayed until an unspecified date after their spacecraft was apparently struck by a small piece of debris, according to Chinese state media.
The three astronauts from the Shenzhou-20 mission flew to the Tiangong space station in April, and were expected to return on Wednesday at the end of a six month mission. Their replacements, the crew of Shenzhou-21, had already arrived on the weekend.
“The Shenzhou-20 crewed spacecraft is suspected to have been struck by a small piece of orbital debris, and assessment of the impact and associated risks is currently under way,” said the China Manned Space Agency in a statement.
“To ensure the health and safety of the astronauts and the successful completion of the mission, it has been decided that the originally planned return of Shenzhou-20 on November 5 will be postponed.”
Authorities didn’t say when the incident is believed to have occurred. There was no indication of any issues earlier this week, with state media reporting on the two crews enjoying a meal of baked chicken cooked on the space station’s first ever oven, delivered by the Shenzhou-21 team. On Tuesday the two teams were reported to have conducted a handover ceremony, with videos posted to social media.
A popular aerospace and science communicator, Yu Jun, who posts under the name Steed’s Scarf, said if the assessments determine it’s too high risk for the spacecraft to return, authorities would activate a “plan B”, potentially the deployment of a waiting backup ship on Earth.
«
Obviously, not good; that debris is causing problems like this creates bigger problems in turn: how do you make the spacecraft safe for re-entry? When are you sure it is safe? What do you do with the damaged one if you’re using a different one?
unique link to this extract
The makers of TurboTax gave Trump’s inauguration $1m. They just got their money’s worth • MSNBC via Yahoo
Helaine Owen:
»
One month before the start of Donald Trump’s second term, Intuit, the parent company of TurboTax, announced a $1m contribution to his inauguration committee. At the time, the company told Politico the donation was “part of our decades-long commitment to bipartisan advocacy.”
But that long-time “bipartisan advocacy” was done with a goal in mind. As Politico reported: “Intuit has numerous interests in Washington that would incentive it to gain favor with the incoming Trump administration. It has spent more than two decades lobbying against the IRS making it easier to file people’s taxes online.”
On Wednesday, the White House granted Intuit’s wish. The Associated Press reports that the Trump administration “plans to eliminate the IRS’ Direct File program,” the government initiative that allowed some taxpayers with simple returns to file with the Internal Revenue Service for free.
The industry’s gain is a major loss for American taxpayers. The 2025 edition of the National Retail Federation’s annual tax return survey found that almost 40% of US adults will prepare our taxes ourselves using computer software — nearly double the next most popular method of filing. Intuit, along with H&R Block, monopolizes the market for that software. And it’s a lucrative market: “Americans spend an estimated 1.7 billion hours and $31bn doing their taxes each year,” ProPublica reported in 2019.
Supporters of Direct File hold up the program as a powerful demonstration of how government can help people and save them both time and money on an annual chore almost all of us despise and stress over (to the point that fatal car accidents actually increase on April 15 compared to other days).
«
It’s so craven. The government has a system that works, and which nobody has objected to (apart from Intuit). But it’s more important to uphold the corrupt system that encourages companies to pay politicians off so they can get elected.
unique link to this extract
Gregor Mendel’s vanishing act • Asimov Press
Niko McCarty:
»
On a winter’s day in 1884, a group of Augustinian friars gathered around a fire and tossed papers into its hungry flames. Thousands of pages withered and burned, each containing hand-written text, charts, and data from a lifetime of work. By the time the smoke dissipated into an azure sky, it had all vanished.
The papers eaten by those flames belonged to Gregor Mendel, a quiet scientist and religious man today revered as the “father” of genetics. Mendel published 14 scientific papers during his lifetime — mostly on meteorology [six] and insect pests — but left behind thousands of pages detailing additional experiments, which may have amounted to a dozen or more manuscripts. We’ll never know for sure, because most of those pages were destroyed after his death. Few details survive about this event; the only source is a second-hand account recorded decades after the fact by Mendel’s first biographer, Hugo Iltis.
This is a shame, for today much of Mendel’s work has been pigeon-holed. He has been reduced to the discoverer of a single thing — namely, the laws of inheritance. In school, students are taught about Punnett squares3 and asked to make simplistic crosses with lowercase and uppercase letters, like “aa” or “Aa.” They learn that Mendel bred peas, and little more. But the truth of this man is much deeper: Mendel was a genius of the highest order, who made important discoveries in a wide range of scientific fields.
«
Though Mendel is taught in schools, his paradigm-breaking work is still seriously underrated for how much it went against the grain at the time.
unique link to this extract
Tahoe’s terrible icons • One Foot Tsunami
Paul Kafasis:
»
On the new MacOS 26 (Tahoe), Apple has mandated that all application icons fit into their prescribed squircle. No longer can icons have distinct shapes, nor even any fun frame-breaking accessories. Should an icon be so foolish as to try to have a bit of personality, it will find itself stuffed into a dingy gray icon jail.
«
This is a visual post, so you have to see the before and after. It’s amazing how the icons on Mac OSX (as was) have gradually lost detail: Safari used to be a fully fledged compass (it’s for finding your way around the web, geddit?), and now it’s a rather blurry blue circle with a red/white arrow. You can see the history at Guis.org.
unique link to this extract
“So much more menacing”: Formula E’s new Gen4 car breaks cover • Ars Technica
Jonathan Gitlin:
»
When season 13 picks up in late 2026, we might see a pretty different kind of Formula E [electric] racing.
“It feels like a real moment for us,” said Dodds. The new car will generate 603 hp in race mode, a 50% jump compared to the Gen3 Evo. That goes up to 804 hp (600 kW) in attack mode. For context, next year’s F1 cars will generate more power, but only when their batteries are fully charged; if the battery is depleted, that leaves just a 536 hp (400 kW) V6.
Acceleration should be extremely violent thanks to permanent AWD—the first for any single seater in FIA competition, at least for the last few decades. Top speed will be close to double that of the original race car, topping out at 210 mph (337 km/h). Now you can see why the sport decided that aerodynamic grip would be a useful addition.
In fact, there will be two different bodywork configurations, one for high downforce and the other with less. But that doesn’t mean Formula E teams will run out and build wind tunnels, like their F1 counterparts. “There’s significant gains that can be made out of software improvements, efficiency improvements, powertrain developments,” said Dodds, so there’s no incentive to spend lots of money on aero development that would only add fractions of a second.
The biggest opportunity for finding performance improvements may be with traction control and antilock braking systems. Formula E wants its technology to be road-relevant, so such driver aids will be unlimited in the Gen4 era. But efficiency will remain of utmost importance; the cars will still have to regenerate 40% of the energy they need to finish the race, as the 55 kWh battery is not sufficient to go flat-out to the end. Happily for the drivers, the new car can regen up to 700 kW of energy under braking.
«
The link about next year’s F1 cars is remarkable: the rear wheels have electric power. They’re becoming hybrids. Will there come a point when Formula 1 and Formula E merge, or overlap?
unique link to this extract
AI firm wins high court ruling after photo agency’s copyright claim • The Guardian
Robert Booth:
»
A London-based artificial intelligence firm has won a landmark high court case examining the legality of AI models using vast troves of copyrighted data without permission.
Stability AI, whose directors include the Oscar-winning film-maker behind Avatar, James Cameron, successfully resisted a claim from Getty Images that it had infringed the international photo agency’s copyright.
The ruling is seen as a blow to copyright owners’ exclusive right to reap the rewards of their work, with one senior lawyer, Rebecca Newman, a legal director at Addleshaw Goddard, warning it means “the UK’s secondary copyright regime is not strong enough to protect its creators”.
There was evidence that Getty’s images were used to train Stability’s model, which allows users to generate images with text prompts. Stability was also found to have infringed Getty’s trademarks in some cases.
The judge, Mrs Justice Joanna Smith, said the question of where to strike the balance between the interests of the creative industries on one side and the AI industry on the other was “of very real societal importance”. But she was only able to rule on relatively narrow claims after Getty had to withdraw parts of its case during the trial this summer.
Getty Images sued Stability AI for infringement of its intellectual property, alleging the AI company was “completely indifferent to what they fed into the training data” and scraped and copied millions of its images.
The judgment comes amid a row over how the Labour government should legislate on the issue of copyright and AI, with artists and authors including Elton John, Kate Bush, Dua Lipa and Kazuo Ishiguro lobbying for protection. Meanwhile, tech companies are calling for wide access to copyrighted content to allow them to build the most powerful and effective generative AI systems.
«
This is the judgment (after all these years, people still don’t link to judgments?). Getty’s complaint seems to have revolved partly around the fact that some generated images would include a generated “Getty” watermark. (See paras 152 onwards of the judgment.)
unique link to this extract
The case that AI is thinking • The New Yorker
James Somers is a programmer:
»
On a brutally hot day this summer, my friend Max met up with his family at a playground. For some reason, a sprinkler for kids was switched off, and Max’s wife had promised everyone that her husband would fix it. Confronted by red-faced six- and seven-year-olds, Max entered a utility shed hoping to find a big, fat “On” switch. Instead, he found a maze of ancient pipes and valves.
He was about to give up when, on a whim, he pulled out his phone and fed a photo into ChatGPT-4o, along with a description of his problem. The A.I. thought for a second, or maybe didn’t think, but all the same it said that he was looking at a backflow-preventer system typical of irrigation setups. Did he see that yellow ball valve toward the bottom? That probably controlled the flow. Max went for it, and cheers rang out across the playground as the water turned on.
Was ChatGPT mindlessly stringing words together, or did it understand the problem? The answer could teach us something important about understanding itself. “Neuroscientists have to confront this humbling truth,” Doris Tsao, a neuroscience professor at the University of California, Berkeley, told me. “The advances in machine learning have taught us more about the essence of intelligence than anything that neuroscience has discovered in the past hundred years.”
Tsao is best known for decoding how macaque monkeys perceive faces. Her team learned to predict which neurons would fire when a monkey saw a specific face; even more strikingly, given a pattern of neurons firing, Tsao’s team could render the face. Their work built on research into how faces are represented inside A.I. models. These days, her favorite question to ask people is “What is the deepest insight you have gained from ChatGPT?” “My own answer,” she said, “is that I think it radically demystifies thinking.”
«
It would be a horrible downgrade if we discovered that thinking isn’t such a sophisticated thing to be able to do after all. Like discovering we’re not at the centre of the solar system, or even universe. (Thanks Gregory B for the link.)
unique link to this extract
| • Why do social networks drive us a little mad? • Why does angry content seem to dominate what we see? • How much of a role do algorithms play in affecting what we see and do online? • What can we do about it? • Did Facebook have any inkling of what was coming in Myanmar in 2016? |
Read Social Warming, my latest book, and find answers – and more. |
Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified








