
Racism has a different face these days – it comes in the form of fake science journals funded by tech bosses. CC-licensed photo by Paul M Walsh on Flickr.
You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.
There’s another post coming this week at the Social Warming Substack on Friday at 0845 UK time. Free signup.
A selection of 9 links for you. Use them wisely. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. On Threads: charles_arthur. On Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@charlesarthur. Observations and links welcome.
Revealed: International ‘race science’ network secretly funded by US tech boss • The Guardian
David Pegg, Tom Burgis, Hannah Devlin and Jason Wilson:
»
An international network of “race science” activists seeking to influence public debate with discredited ideas on race and eugenics has been operating with secret funding from a multimillionaire US tech entrepreneur.
Undercover filming has revealed the existence of the organisation, formed two years ago as the Human Diversity Foundation. Its members have used podcasts, videos, an online magazine and research papers to seed “dangerous ideology” about the supposed genetic superiority of certain ethnic groups.
The anti-racism campaign Hope Not Hate began investigating after encountering the group’s English organiser, a former religious studies teacher, at a far-right conference. Undercover footage was shared with the Guardian, which conducted further research alongside Hope Not Hate and reporting partners in Germany.
HDF received more than $1m from Andrew Conru, a Seattle businessman who made his fortune from dating websites, the recordings reveal. After being approached by the Guardian, Conru pulled his support, saying the group appeared to have deviated from its original mission of “non-partisan academic research”.
While it remains a fringe outfit, HDF is part of a movement to rehabilitate so-called race science as a topic of open debate. Labelled scientific racism by mainstream academics, it seeks to prove biological differences between races such as higher average IQ or a tendency to commit crime. Its supporters claim inequality between groups is largely explained by genetics rather than external factors like discrimination.
Dr Rebecca Sear, the director of the Centre for Culture and Evolution at Brunel University, described it as a “dangerous ideology” with political aims and real-world consequences.
“Scientific racism has been used to argue against any policies that attempt to reduce inequalities between racial groups,” she said. It was also deployed to “argue for more restrictive immigration policies, such as reducing immigration from supposedly ‘low IQ’ populations”.
«
Adam Rutherford, who’s a respected (and respectable) scientist, had a Twitter thread about how this group tried to reel him in a while ago. He didn’t bite. There’s also a Channel 4 documentary coming out on Monday.
unique link to this extract
About that brawl between the WordPress co-founder and WP Engine… • Computerworld
Steven Vaughan-Nichols:
»
the more you look into this conflict, the clearer it becomes that this is no battle between a spunky old-school, open-source leader against a big bad commercial company and more a conflict between a capitalist who wants a bigger share of the WordPress pie and a company that had been doing quite well from the status quo.
If you spend a lot of time following open-source businesses like me, this might sound all too familiar. In the last few years, one successful open-source company after another, such as Hashicorp, Redis, and CockRoachDB, abandoned open source for “fauxpen source” licenses to try to make more money. All these were already multi-hundred-million dollar businesses, but they wanted more. Much more.
Greed is a powerful thing.
That appears to be the case here, too. WordPress can’t try the relicensing move. It’s licensed under the General Public License version 2 (GPLv2), This license is both irrevocable and requires any derived work to be licensed under the same license. What Mullenweg can and is doing, though, is trying to shake down WP Engine for more money.
As my fellow journalist Matthew Ingram pointed out in an excellent essay on the conflict, “Matt is not just the plucky founder of a nonprofit open-source project, he’s a wealthy CEO of a for-profit corporation that is attacking a competitor, and using his status as the founder of the nonprofit to extract money from that competitor.”
From where I sit, this is not a battle over open source. It’s a fight between someone worth hundreds of millions and a company worth billions. When you’re trying to figure out what’s going on in any conflict, whether it’s a family fight, a divorce, or a business fight, one of the best rules of thumb is to follow the money. What it’s telling me here is it’s about the cash.
Unfortunately, this battle can potentially affect me and everyone who uses WordPress and WP Express in particular. I didn’t need this. None of us do.
«
This seems the best summation I’ve seen of this mad situation.
unique link to this extract
How I fell back in love with iPhone photography • The New Yorker
Kyle Chayka:
»
There’s a Japanese word, komorebi, that describes beams of light and dappled shadows that result when the sun shines through trees. When I take my dog on walks around my leafy neighborhood in Washington, D.C., komorebi is what most often catches my eye, especially in this autumnal moment when dense, green summer foliage is starting to thin and turn golden. As the sun sets and the shadows grow long on the edge of a precipitous valley near my apartment, the foliage creates fluttering patterns of warm and cool colors.
I try to photograph these apparitions with my iPhone camera, but I’m always disappointed in the results: the device’s automated image processing treats contrast as a problem to be solved, aggressively darkening the highlights and lightening up the shadows to achieve a bland flatness. Little of the lambent atmosphere I see in real life survives in the image.
Downloading a new camera app recently changed things for me. Halide, which launched in 2017, is an elegant program that can be used in place of your phone’s default camera. It mimics the controls of a digital S.L.R., allowing, for instance, the user to manually adjust the focal length. Halide is a complex app that’s suited for experienced photographers (the name comes from a chemical used in photographic film), but it can also be made very simple, because in August it added a new setting called Process Zero.
Once the mode is switched on, the camera does as little processing as possible, avoiding artificial-intelligence optimization and any other dramatic editing of the photo. (It still performs basic tasks like correcting the white balance and lens distortion.) The iPhone typically merges many separate images together to create one composite; with Halide, you get a single digital image that preserves the richness and the contrast of what you see in front of you. Shadows survive.
«
Haven’t tried this (and naturally the article doesn’t carry comparative photos – it’s the New Yorker!) but it’s certainly an interesting observation. There are lots of camera apps for the iPhone; it can be as many kinds of SLR as you want.
unique link to this extract
FTC tames subscriptions with final ‘click to cancel’ rule • The Register
Thomas Claburn:
»
The US Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday announced a final “click-to-cancel” rule that aims to simplify the process of ending unwanted subscriptions to products and services.
The “Rule Concerning Recurring Subscriptions and Other Negative Option Programs” addresses business practices that make it more difficult for consumers to cancel subscriptions.
“Too often, businesses make people jump through endless hoops just to cancel a subscription,” said FTC Chair Lina Khan in a statement. “The FTC’s rule will end these tricks and traps, saving Americans time and money. Nobody should be stuck paying for a service they no longer want.”
A “negative option program” refers to a business term or condition that allows a merchant to take a consumer’s silence or inaction as a sign of consent. A one-year subscription that gets renewed after a year without notice or consent, for example, would qualify as a negative option.
According to a 2022 survey conducted by C+R Research, consumers on average underestimate the amount they spend monthly on subscription fees by more than 2.5 times, a finding that suggests people lose track of how much they’re spending.
«
This is going to break hearts at the New York Times’s subscription division, where for ages the only way to cancel has been to ring between 9am and 9.10am on the second Tuesday of the month if the moon was full the night before.
unique link to this extract
I’m not sexy enough for my AI • Garbage Day
Ryan Broderick:
»
Elizabeth Laraki, a design partner at Electric Capital, shared a story on X this week about how her speaker photo, when shared on social, looked slightly different than it did when she provided it to the conference she was attending. Laraki contacted the conference and discovered that their social media manager fed it into an AI and it basically invented a hint of a bra underneath her clothes.
We’ve known for a while that many popular image generators are trained on pornographic material, as well as child sexual abuse material. We also know that generators have all sorts of biases built into them and will over-sexualize photos of women and certain races. So this is not a huge surprise.But the thing that I find the most interesting here is that what happened to Laraki was because the conference’s social media manager wanted to better format her photo to share on social platforms. I’ve tried to articulate this point a few different ways over the years, but I’ve never been quite satisfied with it. I am continually amazed at how much of the supposed utility of generative AI is based around solving completely made up problems created by social platforms.
«
The comparison of the photos truly is weird. The AI just wants to sex them up. Both weird and worrying.
unique link to this extract
Amazon goes nuclear, to invest more than $500m to develop small modular reactors • CNBC
Diana Olick:
»
Amazon Web Services is investing more than $500m in nuclear power, announcing three projects from Virginia to Washington state. AWS, Amazon’s subsidiary in cloud computing, has a massive and increasing need for clean energy as it expands its services into generative AI. It’s also a part of Amazon’s path to net-zero carbon emissions.
AWS announced it has signed an agreement with Dominion Energy, Virginia’s utility company, to explore the development of a small modular nuclear reactor, or SMR, near Dominion’s existing North Anna nuclear power station. Nuclear reactors produce no carbon emissions.
An SMR is an advanced type of nuclear reactor with a smaller footprint that allows it to be built closer to the grid. They also have faster construction times than traditional reactors, allowing them to come online sooner.
Amazon is the latest large tech company to buy into nuclear power to fuel the growing demands from data centers. Earlier this week, Google announced it will purchase power from SMR developer Kairos Power. Constellation Energy is restarting Three Mile Island to power Microsoft data centers.
“We see the need for gigawatts of power in the coming years, and there’s not going to be enough wind and solar projects to be able to meet the needs, and so nuclear is a great opportunity,” said Matthew Garman, CEO of AWS.
«
OK, so who’s next? Apple? Facebook? All that AI isn’t going to power itself, you know.
unique link to this extract
In South Korea, deepfake porn wrecks women’s lives and deepens gender conflict • AP News
Hyung-Jin Kim:
»
Three years after the 30-year-old South Korean woman received a barrage of online fake images that depicted her nude, she is still being treated for trauma. She struggles to talk with men. Using a mobile phone brings back the nightmare.
“It completely trampled me, even though it wasn’t a direct physical attack on my body,” she said in a phone interview with The Associated Press. She didn’t want her name revealed because of privacy concerns.
Many other South Korean women recently have come forward to share similar stories as South Korea grapples with a deluge of non-consensual, explicit deepfake videos and images that have become much more accessible and easier to create.
It was not until last week that parliament revised a law to make watching or possessing deepfake porn content illegal.
Most suspected perpetrators in South Korea are teenage boys. Observers say the boys target female friends, relatives and acquaintances — also mostly minors — as a prank, out of curiosity or misogyny. The attacks raise serious questions about school programs but also threaten to worsen an already troubled divide between men and women.
Deepfake porn in South Korea gained attention after unconfirmed lists of schools that had victims spread online in August. Many girls and women have hastily removed photos and videos from their Instagram, Facebook and other social media accounts. Thousands of young women have staged protests demanding stronger steps against deepfake porn. Politicians, academics and activists have held forums.
«
Noted the schools angle here last month: this seems to be growing.
unique link to this extract
Elon Musk’s X still struggles to grow subscription revenue • TechCrunch
Sarah Perez:
»
Elon Musk’s plan to reduce X’s dependence on advertising revenue by increasing paid subscriptions is still not taking off. According to a new, third-party analysis of the X Premium subscription service by app intelligence firm Appfigures, X has pulled in approximately $200m in in-app purchase revenue across iOS and Android since the original 2021 launch of the subscription formerly known as Twitter Blue.
There are some caveats to this figure. For starters, the sum is based only on those purchases made via the mobile app, not the mobile web or desktop web. That means the true sum is likely higher, especially given X offers a discount for web purchases.
Then there are the commission fees to consider. After paying app store commissions, X will have made a minimum of $140m, the firm estimates. However, that figure will also likely be higher because Apple and Google discount commissions from 30% to 15% in year two. (Appfigures doesn’t have a way to reliably calculate how many subscriptions are associated with each commission rate, we’re told).
For further context, though Twitter Blue was launched in 2021, it was relaunched in December 2022 as Twitter under Musk pushed into non-advertising revenue. Within the first three months post-relaunch, the service brought in only $11m in mobile app subscriptions, per data from app data provider Sensor Tower. A year ago, the company now called X launched two additional subscriptions, Basic and Premium+.
While there’s no way to definitively determine how many of X’s users are paying for X Premium subscriptions, there are ways to back into some estimates here, at least in terms of native mobile subscribers.
«
The backing in is pretty rough and ready, but leads – even generously – to paid subscriber numbers of fewer than 4 million users. There are various other estimates about income for “creators” (read: engagement baiters with blue ticks). Bloomberg said earlier this year that X revenue was just under $1.5bn, so subscriptions still don’t really matter.
And in not-mattering-related news…
unique link to this extract
Elon Musk’s X dodges EU’s DMA as bloc decides platform isn’t important enough for fairness controls • TechCrunch
Natasha Lomas:
»
Elon Musk’s X won’t be regulated under the European Union’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) the Commission decided Wednesday, despite the social media platform hitting usage thresholds earlier this year.
The decision means X won’t be subject to the DMA’s list of operational ‘dos and don’ts’ — in areas like its use of third party data and user consent to tracking ads — for the foreseeable future. The pan-EU regime targets Big Tech with up-front rules that are generally aimed at ensuring fairer dealing with individual and business users (so far seven companies have been designated as DMA gatekeepers for a total of two dozen “core platform services”, including other social media giants like Meta and TikTok).
While not joining the DMA gatekeeper club is undoubtedly good news for Musk, since he dodges the regulatory risk of being subject to the bloc’s flagship market contestability regime — where penalties for violations can reach up to 10% of global annual turnover (or more for repeat breaches) — the reason for X not being designated may sting his ego: the Commission has decided X is not an important gateway for businesses to reach consumers.
Think of it as the EU throwing shade on the bottom-feeding caliber of X’s ad business these days. Or, tl;dr, if most of your ads are for drop-shipping companies flogging dubious-looking earwax cleaners or polyester rugs so violently patterned they could make a sofa-sitter seasick your business is irrelevant.
Still, X will surely be happy to flutter free of any DMA risk. The platform had submitted arguments against being designated when it notified the EU back in May that it had hit the 45 million monthly active users and 10,000 business users bar. We’ve contacted X’s press line for comment.«
| • Why do social networks drive us a little mad? • Why does angry content seem to dominate what we see? • How much of a role do algorithms play in affecting what we see and do online? • What can we do about it? • Did Facebook have any inkling of what was coming in Myanmar in 2016? Read Social Warming, my latest book, and find answers – and more. |
Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified










