Start Up No.1321: meet the Clubhouse audio app, image scrubbing for protesters, Huawei CFO faces extradition, Facebook staff walk out, and more


Google’s newer Pixel phones are getting an update to help in situations like this. CC-licensed photo by d26b73 on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 11 links for you. Use them wisely. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Dallas Police asked people to submit videos of protestors but instead they got K-Pop • Buzzfeed News

Caroline Haskins:

»

On Sunday, the Dallas Police Department asked people to send in “video of illegal activity” from the Black Lives Matter protests in the city through the iWatch Dallas app, where people can submit photo, video, or text tips about possible crimes. Instead, it received a flood of pictures and videos of K-pop artists.

In response to the tweeted request from Dallas Police, hundreds of K-pop fans replied with photos and videos of their favorite artists. Many people also claimed to have submitted videos of the police harming protesters, as well as fan edits of K-pop artists, to the iWatch Dallas app.

Within hours of the original tweet, the Dallas Police Department followed up with a tweet that the iWatch Dallas app was down temporarily “due to technical difficulties.” (K-pop fans confirmed they too were having difficulties submitting to the app.) Hundreds of people subsequently replied to this Dallas PD tweet with memes and videos of K-pop artists.

«

Hmm, possibly not quite reading the social media room there. People who were at the protests are unlikely to be the ones who’d send content to the DPD. Speaking of images at protests…
unique link to this extract


Image Scrubber • Github

»

This is a tool for anonymizing photographs taken at protests.

It will remove identifying metadata (Exif data) from photographs, and also allow you to selectively blur parts of the image to cover faces and other identifiable information.

Hit the open button to open a photograph. The program will display the data it is removing.

Click okay, and you can then save the scrubbed image by hitting save or right clicking on it and saving it. Maximum size is 2500×2500 pixels – larger images will be scaled down.

You can select between painting over the image or blurring it out. Dragging on the image will paint on or blur it. You can change your brush size via the slider. The blur function has built-in pixel shuffling/noise and is fairly secure but sensitive information should be covered with the paint tool.

This tool works offline: on a phone you can load the page then turn on airplane mode (or turn off wifi/data) before opening any pictures.

«

Works on computers too, essentially as a web server on your machine. Probably useful for other things too, but being able to deploy it on the spot could be helpful.
unique link to this extract


The over-under on the new voice-chat app Clubhouse • The Information

Sam Lessin:

»

Clubhouse is an extremely simple audio chat-room app. You log in as a user and see a handful of conversations (usually one or two right now) going on with lists of who is listening and who is speaking in each. You don’t see any other context about the topic.

You can choose to enter a conversation as a listener, at which point you hear—much like talk radio—the live conversation of whoever is speaking. You can be invited to speak, ask to speak (raise your hand) in an existing conversation, or start a new conversation that others can join.

Small, subtle details keep conversations flowing smoothly. For instance, the conversation keeps going even when you leave the app on your phone (it is actually quite challenging to turn off the audio once you enter a conversation, which encourages people to linger and listen to others talk). The app also does some smart things with push notifications to help people engage in conversations.

The best analogy for the app overall is that it feels like being in the lobby of a conference between scheduled sessions. You see clusters of people gathered. You likely recognize some of them, but not all. You can choose to walk over and join a circle and hear what people are talking about and perhaps participate, and if it turns out the topic is not of interest, you can move on.

The app offers something similar to those spontaneous miniconference conversations. You get to briefly see and hear from people whom you might like but don’t generally spend time with. Every once in a while you hear something interesting you wouldn’t have otherwise heard or thought of. And it can be fun and interesting to hear directly from luminaries—people you wouldn’t normally have access to—who happen to be hanging out in the app.

«

But, he says, there are three problems with it right now: “the vast majority of the content and conversations are not engaging” because they aren’t constrained (contrast: TikTok – 30 seconds and you’re out), the conversations are ephemeral rather than permanent (creates long-term problems over user trust), and someone else might just bolt it on to their app. Looking at you, Facebook. Anyway, their latest round valued them at $100m; they’ve raised $10m.
unique link to this extract


Pixel feature drop lands, improves Adaptive Battery • Android Authority

C Scott Brown:

»

Here are the new updates your phone will enjoy once you’ve downloaded the latest Pixel feature drop:

Adaptive Battery: This feature helps conserve precious battery life by reducing system activity as you get closer to zero. Now, though, Adaptive Battery is actually predicting when your phone will run out of battery and compensating appropriately. Of course, bigger batteries would help negate the need for this feature, but Google may have finally gotten that message.
• Prepare for Bedtime: This new Pixel feature drop brings some updates to Google’s suite of Digital Wellbeing tools. Bedtime — which was previously known as Wind Down — has a few new tricks to help you sleep better…
• Recorder and Assistant working together: Google’s incredibly powerful Recorder app makes it a snap to record lectures, interviews, and meetings. Now, you can use Google Assistant to control Recorder, which means simple voice commands can start/stop recordings. You can also use your voice to search your transcripts.
• Real-life protection: This third Pixel feature drop will not only make your phone more useful, but it will also help keep you safer. Safety check helps you check-in with friends and family while you’re traveling alone and you can issue emergency alerts to several contacts all at once.

«

The protection feature is a good idea.
unique link to this extract


Extradition of Meng Wanzhou, Huawei CFO, clears major hurdle • The New York Times

Tracy Sherlock and Dan Bilefsky:

»

The chief financial officer of the Chinese technology giant Huawei came one step closer to standing trial in the United States on sweeping fraud charges after a Canadian court ruled on Wednesday that prosecutors had satisfied a critical legal requirement for her extradition from Canada.

The executive, Meng Wanzhou, was arrested in Vancouver in December 2018, at the request of the United States, and indicted in January 2019. Her detention set off one of the biggest legal dramas in recent Canadian memory, its twists and turns parsed on national television.

Her arrest also thrust Canada into the middle of a diplomatic struggle between the United States and China — over trade, theft of technology secrets and whether Huawei’s efforts in helping countries build 5G next-generation mobile networks present a threat to national security.

And it severely strained Canada’s own relations with China. Shortly after Ms. Meng’s arrest, China detained — in retaliation, some say — two Canadians and accused them of espionage. They are still in secret jails in China.

That relationship has become more fraught since, with Canadians criticizing China’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic and its human rights policies. Wednesday’s decision is expected to aggravate those tensions.

«

I was wondering the other day what happened to this. And now we know. Gradually, gradually.
unique link to this extract


For cops who kill, special Supreme Court protection • Reuters

Andrew Chung, Lawrence Hurley, Jackie Botts, Andrea Januta and Guillermo Gomez, writing on May 8 about the two-step process which frequently gives American police “qualified immunity” against lawsuits when they kill people:

»

Reuters found among the cases it analyzed more than three dozen in which qualified immunity protected officers whose actions had been deemed unlawful. Outside of Dallas, Texas, five officers fired 17 shots at a bicyclist who was 100 yards away, killing him, in a case of mistaken identity. In Heber City, Utah, an officer threw to the ground an unarmed man he had pulled over for a cracked windshield, leaving the man with brain damage. In Prince George’s County, Maryland, an officer shot a man in a mental health crisis who was stabbing himself and trying to slit his own throat.

The increasing frequency of such cases has prompted a growing chorus of criticism from lawyers, legal scholars, civil rights groups, politicians and even judges that qualified immunity, as applied, is unjust. Spanning the political spectrum, this broad coalition says the doctrine has become a nearly failsafe tool to let police brutality go unpunished and deny victims their constitutional rights.

The high court has indicated it is aware of the mounting criticism of its treatment of qualified immunity. After letting multiple appeals backed by the doctrine’s critics pile up, the justices are scheduled to discuss privately as soon as May 15 which, if any, of 11 such cases they could hear later this year.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the court’s most liberal members, and Clarence Thomas, its most conservative, have in recent opinions sharply criticized qualified immunity and the court’s role in expanding it.

In a dissent to a 2018 ruling, Sotomayor, joined by fellow liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, wrote that the majority’s decision favoring the cops tells police that “they can shoot first and think later, and it tells the public that palpably unreasonable conduct will go unpunished.”

«

This was timely, but it’s incredible that such a huge case law hurdle has built up at a time when American police carry increasingly dangerous weapons.
unique link to this extract


Trump’s plan to end Obama’s peaceful police reform succeeded • NY Mag

Jonathan Chait:

»

The world around us, in which the streets of every major American city are filled with protesters, is the result of Trump granting the wishes of the most retrograde police officers. They are getting what they asked for.

The last few years of the Obama administration were one of the most productive periods of criminal justice reform in American history. The Obama administration changed sentencing guidelines to reduce the disparity in the treatment of drug crimes that had disproportionately harmed black defendants. As part of an effort to inculcate a “guardian, not a warrior” mindset, it restricted the transfer of surplus military equipment to police departments. Most importantly, it formed consent decrees with more than a dozen police departments to force them to change their practices.

These reforms did not root out brutality and racism. They were mild both in form and intent, undertaken with the goal of conciliating police and their communities, believing that enhancing trust would ultimately create safer conditions for police as well as those who fear them. It was the epitome of evolutionary cultural change.

This was the context for Trump’s nightmarish claims in 2016 that cities were being overtaken by bloodshed and carnage. Whatever wisps of data he could cite to support his wild rhetoric, Trump was drawing a picture borrowed from the imaginations of resentful police who experienced Obama’s carefully drawn nudges as intolerable oppression.

«

We’re starting to get the picture now of how this all came about. Expect that this will get mentioned in an anti-Trump ad ahead of the election. (Thanks G for the link.)
unique link to this extract


Facebook employees hold virtual walkout over Mark Zuckerberg’s refusal to act against Trump • The Guardian

Alex Hern:

»

Disagreement came from employees at all levels of the company, including some senior staff. Particular criticism was levelled at Zuckerberg’s personal decision to leave up the Facebook version of a tweet sent by Trump in which the president appeared to encourage police to shoot rioters. By contrast, Twitter hid the message behind a warning.

Andrew Crow, the head of design for Facebook’s Portal videophone, tweeted: “Giving a platform to incite violence and spread disinformation is unacceptable, regardless who you are or if it’s newsworthy. I disagree with Mark’s position and will work to make change happen.”

Jason Stirman, a member of the company’s R&D team and the former chief executive of the “mental training” app Lucid, also posted on Twitter, saying: “I don’t know what to do, but I know doing nothing is not acceptable. I’m a FB employee that completely disagrees with Mark’s decision to do nothing about Trump’s recent posts, which clearly incite violence. I’m not alone inside of FB. There isn’t a neutral position on racism.”

On Friday Zuckerberg said he disagreed with Twitter’s interpretation of Trump’s statement, which included the phrase: “When the looting starts, the shooting starts.” Where Twitter had read the statement as incitement  – encouraging police to shoot at protesters – Zuckerberg said he read it as a warning to protesters that the police would be shooting at them. The distinction meant that the post fell on the right side of Facebook’s rules, Zuckerberg said, and would not be removed.

«

The number of people who have publicly expressed discontent is remarkable. Normally, it’s absolutely crickets. There’s an echo of what happened at Microsoft over antitrust, and Google over its tailored-for-China search engine: you stop becoming the place where people want to work, because the reputational hit hurts. However, these are unusual times in so many ways: jobs in the tech industry aren’t as easy to come by as before. Perhaps there will be passive resistance over this. But Zuckerberg likely isn’t for moving; read on.
unique link to this extract


Facebook employees stage virtual walkout to protest Trump posts • The New York Times

Sheera Frankel, Mike Isaac and Cecilia Kang:

»

In private online chats, employees have called for the resignation of Joel Kaplan, Facebook’s vice president of global policy. Mr. Kaplan is seen as being a strong conservative voice within the company. In 2018, he upset some employees when he sat in the front row of the confirmation hearings of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who was a close friend.

Roger McNamee, a venture capitalist who was an early investor in Facebook but in recent years has turned into an aggressive critic of the company, said Facebook’s decision to leave Mr. Trump’s posts alone was typical of a longtime pattern of behavior among big social media companies.

“Internet platforms that are pervasive — as Facebook and Google are globally — must always align with power, including authoritarians. It is a matter of self-preservation,” Mr. McNamee said. “Facebook has been a key tool for authoritarians in Brazil, the Philippines, Cambodia and Myanmar. In the U.S., Facebook has consistently ignored or altered its terms of service to the benefit of Trump. Until last week, Twitter did the same thing.”

«

Kaplan is seen by a number inside Facebook as having blocked moves to stop polarisation, because the most polarising forces on the site are right-wing ones.
unique link to this extract


Trump’s executive order isn’t about Twitter • The Atlantic

Zeynep Tufekci says that Trump is posturing in order to warn Mark Zuckerberg, not Twitter:

»

Playing the refs by browbeating them has long been a key move in the right-wing playbook against traditional media. The method is simple: It involves badgering them with accusations of unfairness and bias so that they bend over backwards to accommodate a “both sides” narrative even when the sides were behaving very differently, or when one side was not grounded in fact. Climate-change deniers funded by fossil-fuel companies effectively used this strategy for decades, relying on journalists’ training and instinct to equate objectivity with representing both sides of a story. This way of operating persisted even when one of the sides was mostly bankrolled by the fossil-fuel industry while the other was a near-unanimous consensus of independent experts and academics.

Some right-wing groups quickly adapted that strategy to social media, specifically Facebook and Twitter, which have become outsize gatekeepers in the public sphere, with enormous decision-making power over what gets amplified and what gets buried. For Facebook, that gatekeeper is a single person, Mark Zuckerberg. Facebook’s young CEO is an emperor of information who decides rules of amplification and access to speech for billions of people, simply due to the way ownership of Facebook shares are structured: Zuckerberg personally controls 60% of the voting power. And just like the way people try to get on or advertise on the president’s seemingly favourite TV show, Fox & Friends, merely to reach him, Trump is clearly aiming to send a message to his one-person target.

As long as Facebook and other social-media platforms make money by increasing engagement without much regard to the content they algorithmically amplify, it doesn’t matter whether every last employee is an avowed liberal.

«

unique link to this extract


George Floyd’s brother said Trump “didn’t give me the opportunity to speak” • Buzzfeed News

Clarissa-Jan Lim:

»

After days of angry protests across the country over the death of George Floyd, President Donald Trump said he called the Floyd family on Friday. But in an interview Saturday, Philonise Floyd said Trump “didn’t give me the opportunity to even speak” about his brother.

“It was so fast. He didn’t give me the opportunity to even speak. It was hard,” Philonise told Rev. Al Sharpton on MSNBC. “I was trying to talk to him, but he just kept like pushing me off like, ‘I don’t want to hear what you’re talking about.'”

…”Yesterday I spoke to George’s family and expressed the sorrow of our entire nation for their loss,” Trump said. “I stand before you as a friend and ally to every American seeking justice and peace, and I stand before you in firm opposition to anyone exploiting this tragedy to loot, rob, attack, and menace.”

Philonise said he tried to tell Trump about his desire for justice. “I just told him, I want justice. I said that I couldn’t believe that they committed a modern-day lynching in broad daylight,” he said Saturday.

“I love my brother. I’m never going to see him again,” he said, breaking down.

«

Remember the row that blew up over Trump phoning the widow of a soldier killed on an operation in Niger? He still can’t express empathy for black people’s deaths.
unique link to this extract


Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified

Start Up No.1320: Trump v Twitter (and how it happened), Microsoft’s AI takes over from journalists, Amazon kills its Look, and more


Pizza: an ideal product for a bit of arbitrage with Softbank’s money. CC-licensed photo by Matt on Flickr.

You can sign up to receive each day’s Start Up post by email. You’ll need to click a confirmation link, so no spam.

A selection of 12 links for you. Not available where curfewed. I’m @charlesarthur on Twitter. Observations and links welcome.

Trump, Twitter and Jack Dorsey • The New York Times

Maureen Dowd has some advice for Jack Dorsey:

»

You could answer the existential question of whether @realDonaldTrump even exists if he doesn’t exist on Twitter. I tweet, therefore I am. Dorsey meets Descartes.

All it would take is one sweet click to force the greatest troll in the history of the internet to meet his maker. Maybe he just disappears in an orange cloud of smoke, screaming, “I’m melllllllting.”

Do Trump — and the world — a favor and send him back into the void whence he came. And then go have some fun: Meditate and fast for days on end!

Our country is going through biological, economic and societal convulsions. We can’t trust the powerful forces in this nation to tell us the truth or do the right thing. In fact, not only can we not trust them. We have every reason to believe they’re gunning for us.

In Washington, the Trump administration’s deception about the virus was lethal. On Wall Street and in Silicon Valley, the fat cats who carved up the country, drained us dry and left us with no safety net profiteered off the virus. In Minneapolis, the barbaric death of George Floyd after a police officer knelt on him for almost nine minutes showed yet again that black Americans have everything to fear from some who are charged with protecting them.

As if that weren’t enough, from the slough of our despond, we have to watch Donald Trump duke it out with the lords of the cloud in a contest to see who can destroy our democracy faster.

I wish I could go along with those who say this dark period of American life will ultimately make us nicer and simpler and more contemplative. How can that happen when the whole culture has been re-engineered to put us at each other’s throats?

«

Also worth reading: Will Oremus at Medium gives a step-by-step on what happened, and some similar detail by the NYT.
unique link to this extract


President Trump versus the mods • The New York Times

Kevin Roose says that this situation is more like trollish behaviour on old forums:

»

looking at Mr. Trump as an aggrieved user of a fractious internet forum, rather than a politician making high-minded claims about freedom of speech, clarifies the dynamics at play here. Mod drama is never really about who’s allowed to say what, or which specific posts broke which specific rules. Often, it’s part of a power struggle between chaos and order, fought by people who thrive in a lawless environment.

In Twitter’s case, the company is enforcing rules it already had on its books — one prohibiting misinformation related to the voting process, and another prohibiting glorifying violence. They’re both clear, sensible rules, and Mr. Trump’s punishment for breaking them was relatively gentle. Twitter didn’t ban Mr. Trump or take down his tweets. It placed a small disclaimer on two of them — a pair of baseless tweets stating that mail-in ballots were ripe for voter fraud — and put a warning label on another.
But given Twitter’s history of permissiveness with Mr. Trump, any action to restrain him was bound to cause a stir. And Mr. Trump and his allies wasted no time going nuclear.

…Twitter, Facebook and YouTube are private enterprises, with no First Amendment obligations to users, and courts have consistently ruled that these companies can set their own rules, just as restaurants can require guests to wear shirts and shoes.

But Mr. Trump — whose entire online personality is built on pushing boundaries, and whose re-election campaign has already had some of its ads taken down for violating Facebook’s rules — has a strategic interest in getting the mods off his back, by intimidating social media executives into letting him post with impunity.

Facebook seems to have gotten Mr. Trump’s message.

«

Jack Dorsey isn’t backing down, and I think the whole of his company is with him. By contrast, there’s a lot of internal dissent over Zuckerberg’s stated position. Mutiny is a possibility.
unique link to this extract


Caught on camera, police explode in rage and violence across the US • The Verge

TC Sottek:

»

On Saturday, the names of several police officers allegedly seen perpetrating violence in different cities began trending on Twitter as people worked to cross-reference faces from videos with personal information on the web.

The violence appears so widespread and consistent that you could be mistaken for thinking it’s coordinated at a national level. To some extent, it is: President Trump has cheered on police violence like a fan at a sports event, and police departments across the country have styled themselves as military forces after receiving two decades of hand-me-downs from the War on Terror.

“US cities face toll of violent protests,” says a headline at the top of Fox News. “Fury in the streets as protests spread across the US,” says The New York Times. “Fire and fury spread across the US,” says The Washington Post. “Wave of rage and anguish sweeps dozens of US cities,” says CNN. But whose rage? Whose fury? Whose violence?

Here’s another: ABC local news in Utah runs a graphic saying “violent protests in Salt Lake City.” In the background of the video, police knock an elderly man with a cane to the ground. He was simply standing near a bus stop.

«

US police departments have become increasingly militarised, literally, with the transfer of surplus military equipment from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, with particular spikes after 2010. Maybe the police should also be tested for steroids, like athletes; it’s known to increase aggressive behaviour.
unique link to this extract


Microsoft lays off journalists to replace them with AI • The Verge

Tom Warren:

»

Microsoft is laying off dozens of journalists and editorial workers at its Microsoft News and MSN organizations. The layoffs are part of a bigger push by Microsoft to rely on artificial intelligence to pick news and content that’s presented on MSN.com, inside Microsoft’s Edge browser, and in the company’s various Microsoft News apps. Many of the affected workers are part of Microsoft’s SANE (search, ads, News, Edge) division, and are contracted as human editors to help pick stories.

“Like all companies, we evaluate our business on a regular basis,” says a Microsoft spokesperson in a statement. “This can result in increased investment in some places and, from time to time, re-deployment in others. These decisions are not the result of the current pandemic.”

While Microsoft says the layoffs aren’t directly related to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, media businesses across the world have been hit hard by advertising revenues plummeting across TV, newspapers, online, and more.

«

50 jobs in the US, about 27 in the UK. I took a look at MSN.com and couldn’t see any glaring errors. Let’s check back in a little while.
unique link to this extract


AI isn’t magical and won’t help you reopen your business • WSJ

Christopher Mims:

»

When SharpestMinds, a startup that sells mentoring services to data scientists, surveyed its alumni in April and again in May, it found that 6% of respondents had been affected by furloughs, pay cuts or layoffs. That’s a drop on the ocean compared to the enormous layoffs in, say, the restaurant business, but it’s notable because these jobs are generally thought to be business-critical roles requiring high-demand specialized skill sets.

Uber recently shut down its AI research lab, and Airbnb’s layoffs included at least 29 full-time data scientists, according to its directory of those let go.

The pain for data scientists will likely increase as companies rethink how they spend, predicts SharpestMinds founder Edouard Harris. Hiring for such roles has slowed significantly, down by 50% since before the pandemic, he adds. On the other hand, that means there’s still demand, though it’s diminished.

What’s happening is not so much a reckoning as a “rationalization” of the application of AI in businesses, says Rajeev Sharma, head of enterprise AI at Pactera Edge, a technology-consulting firm. “[Companies] feel this is a time they can get rid of extra hires or lower performers who are not a good cultural fit,” he adds.

By contrast, the deep-pocketed big tech companies clearly see AI as not merely important but core to their businesses, and plan to keep hiring like crazy. Google chief executive Sundar Pichai has said that in the sweep of human history, AI is more important than electricity or fire, and all the Big Five have said they’ll continue to add to their engineering ranks during this downturn, including data scientists and AI experts. Now is a great time to hire them, says Mr. Sharma. He says it’s like buying discounted shares after a stock-market crash.

«

AI is more important than electricity or fire? That’s quite the statement. Uber clearly doesn’t think so.
unique link to this extract


Is science being set up to take the blame? • Light Blue Touchpaper

Ross Anderson:

»

Having spent a dozen years on the [Cambridge] university’s governing body and various of its subcommittees, I can absolutely get how this happened. Once a committee gets going, it can become very reluctant to change its opinion on anything. Committees can become sociopathic, worrying about their status, ducking liability, and finding reasons why problems are either somebody else’s or not practically soluble.

So I spent a couple of hours yesterday reading the minutes, and indeed we see the group worried about its power: on February 13th it wants the messaging to emphasise that official advice is both efficaceous and sufficient, to “reduce the likelihood of the public adopting unnecessary or contradictory behaviours”. Turf is defended: Public Health England (PHE) ruled on February 18th that it can cope with 5 new cases a week (meaning tracing 800 contacts) and hoped this might be increased to 50; they’d already decided the previous week that it wasn’t possible to accelerate diagnostic capacity. So far, so much as one might expect.

The big question, though, is why nobody thought of protecting people in care homes. The answer seems to be that SAGE dismissed the problem early on as “too hard” or “not our problem”. On March 5th they note that social distancing for over-65s could save a lot of lives and would be most effective for those living independently: but it would be “a challenge to implement this measure in communal settings such as care homes”. They appear more concerned that “Many of the proposed measures will be easier to implement for those on higher incomes” and the focus is on getting PHE to draft guidance.

…My experience of university committees makes this all just too painfully familiar. What’s failed here is not the science, but the process of government.

«

unique link to this extract


Zero-day exploit in Sign in with Apple • Bhavukjain.com

Bhavuk Jain:

»

What if I say, your Email ID is all I need to takeover your account on your favorite website or an app. Sounds scary, right? This is what a bug in Sign in with Apple allowed me to do.

In the month of April, I found a zero-day in Sign in with Apple that affected third-party applications which were using it and didn’t implement their own additional security measures. This bug could have resulted in a full account takeover of user accounts on that third party application irrespective of a victim having a valid Apple ID or not.

For this vulnerability, I was paid $100,000 by Apple under their Apple Security Bounty program.

«

There are technical details, but they’re.. technical. I don’t think this is an iOS exploit, but a server-side on which Apple should have been able to fix on its own. His publication implies that he’s been told he can publish.
unique link to this extract


Amazon Echo Look no more – another Alexa device discontinued • Voicebot.ai

Bret Kinsella:

»

Amazon quietly introduced the Echo Look Alexa-enabled smart speaker for fashion advice in April 2017. Yesterday, the company quietly informed its few thousand users that Echo Look would be discontinued. In providing background on the latest shakeup of Amazon’s Alexa portfolio, an Amazon spokesperson shared the text of an email sent to Echo Look users yesterday saying:

“When we introduced Echo Look three years ago, our goal was to train Alexa to become a style assistant as a novel way to apply AI and machine learning to fashion. With the help of our customers we evolved the service, enabling Alexa to give outfit advice and offer style recommendations. We’ve since moved Style by Alexa features into the Amazon Shopping app and to Alexa-enabled devices making them even more convenient and available to more Amazon customers. For that reason, we have decided it’s time to wind down Echo Look. Beginning July 24, 2020, both Echo Look and its app will no longer function…”

«

Congratulations, folks, you’ve got another dead device to take to the dump, if it ever reopens.
unique link to this extract


Doordash and pizza arbitrage • Margins by Ranjan Roy and Can Duruk

Ranjan Roy had a friend who runs pizza restaurants in New York, and in March 2019 was getting complaints from people saying the pizzas delivered from their restaurants were cold. Except: the restaurants didn’t deliver:

»

He realized that a delivery option had mysteriously appeared on their company’s Google Listing. The delivery option was created by Doordash.

To confirm, he had never spoken with anyone from Doordash and after years of resisting the siren song of delivery revenue, certainly did not want to be listed. But the words “Order Delivery” were right there, prominently on the Google snippet.

He messaged me asking me if I knew anything about Doordash, and oh boy, did I get Softbank-triggered. I had just read about their $400m Series F and it was among the WeWorkian class of companies that, for me, represented everything wrong about startup evolution through the 2010s. Raise a ton of money, lose a ton of money, and just obliterate the basic economics of an industry.

Doordash was causing him real problems. The most common was, Doordash delivery drivers didn’t have the proper bags for pizza so it inevitably would arrive cold. It led to his employees wasting time responding to complaints and even some bad Yelp reviews.

But he brought up another problem – the prices were off. He was frustrated that customers were seeing incorrectly low prices. A pizza that he charged $24 for was listed as $16 by Doordash.

My first thought: I wondered if Doordash is artificially lowering prices for customer acquisition purposes.

My second thought: I knew Doordash scraped restaurant websites. After we discussed it more, it was clear that the way his menu was set up on his website, Doordash had mistakenly taken the price for a plain cheese pizza and applied it to a ‘specialty’ pizza with a bunch of toppings.

My third thought: Cue the Wall Street trader in me…..ARBITRAGE!!!!

If someone could pay Doordash $16 a pizza, and Doordash would pay his restaurant $24 a pizza, then he should clearly just order pizzas himself via Doordash, all day long. You’d net a clean $8 profit per pizza [insert nerdy economics joke about there is such a thing as a free lunch].

«

Do you think they’d act on this knowledge? Well, do you, punk? (This story has already had wide circulation, but it’s a great read if not. And Margins is a good newsletter – one or two editions per week. Recommended.)
unique link to this extract


Sars, Ebola and Mers were near misses that led us to believe Covid-19 would pass us by too • New Statesman

Ian Leslie:

»

Sars killed about 800 people worldwide (one in ten who were infected), mostly in China and its neighbours. To the extent that the rest of the world noticed, the disease was thought to have faded away. Those who fought the outbreak at close quarters, however, knew that Sars didn’t burn out of its own accord. It had to be stopped in its tracks.

In industries that have to be vigilant for risks of disaster, such as aviation or nuclear energy, “near misses” are treated as flashing red lights. When a plane almost misses its landing or a factory explosion is narrowly averted, investigations are made, processes revised: just because the disaster did not occur it does not mean it won’t next time.

But near misses can also breed complacency. We have a tendency, identified by those who study the psychology of risk, to treat near misses as grounds for optimism. Since the worst didn’t happen, people become strengthened in their conviction that it won’t ever happen. A recent Norwegian study of traffic behaviour found that drivers who had experienced near accidents were subsequently more willing to take risks. At the level of organisations, close calls are sometimes taken as reasons to stick with existing procedures. The organisational theorists Junko Shimazoe and Richard Burton call this the “justification shift”.

…To learn from a near miss, you first have to recognise it as one.

…When we make inquiries into the management of this crisis, I worry that we will learn only how we should have fought Covid-19, rather than how to deal with the next outbreak. Awful as this virus is, I wonder what we would be going through now if it was even more transmissible, or if it was killing children in their thousands. We should confront the possibility that what we are experiencing now is itself a near miss.

«

That last paragraph is one to mull over. We have been really, really lucky even as we are burying the dead.
unique link to this extract


Yesterday, the Beatles and why talent isn’t enough • UnHerd

Dorian Lynskey:

»

Around this time last year, I came out of a press screening of Yesterday thinking that writer Richard Curtis and director Danny Boyle had wasted a fantastic concept. What if you were the only person on Earth who remembered the Beatles? The film gave the dullest possible answer: you’d become a megastar by playing their songs but you’d feel a bit grubby about it. As I wrote at the time, “Not only does Curtis not answer the questions he has raised; he doesn’t even appear to notice he has asked them.” Now it turns out that a much more interesting take already existed: the original screenplay.

Last week, struggling screenwriter Jack Barth told Uproxx how, in 2012, he wrote a screenplay called Cover Version about an unsuccessful singer-songwriter who — you’ve guessed it — is the only person who remembers the Beatles and presents their songs as his own. But while Yesterday’s Jack Malik, the latest in a long line of sweet but emotionally inept Curtismen, hits the big time, Barth’s protagonist does not.

…The Barth theory, as far as I can tell without being able to read his screenplay, is that success is contingent on several factors — timing, momentum, charisma, connections, luck — of which inspiration is not necessarily the most important. “I was lying in bed one night thinking, if Star Wars hadn’t been made and I just came up with the idea for Star Wars, I bet I wouldn’t be able to sell it,” said Barth, who had 25 unproduced screenplays under his belt. “Carry that on to the Beatles, if I knew all the Beatles songs, I bet I couldn’t be successful with it.”

Anyone with a significant interest in the history of pop music knows this to be true.

«

The whole story is a great insight into how screenplays get mangled, strangled and passed around, but also into the question of whether fame is inevitable.
unique link to this extract


Pixel Buds 2 review, one month later: too many compromises • Android Police

Taylor Kerns:

»

It’s been a month and change since Google launched its first true wireless earbuds. When I first got my hands on the Pixel Buds, I was struck by their fit and finish, comfort, and sound quality, but nagging problems like audible interference at low volumes and short battery life left me feeling lukewarm on the whole. I’ve been using them regularly ever since, but unfortunately, my opinion hasn’t changed: there are too many compromises in the 2020 Pixel Buds to justify their [$179] price for most buyers.

…I suspect the disappointing [battery] longevity is down to inefficient software. The cells in the two buds drain at varying rates — I’ve seen a difference as high as 50 percentage points between left and right. Google says that’s normal, that “the two earbuds serve different functions at different times” and software “monitors the state on both earbuds and can switch either earbud to support more power hungry functions.” While it’s true I never had one bud die with significant juice left in the other, it’s still disconcerting to see such a discrepancy between the two. There’s just gotta be a better way to accomplish what Google is going for here. This might also be addressed in firmware patches, but there’s no way of knowing whether it will.

«

Poor battery life for the price, plus an annoying static hiss that Google tells him “most people won’t be able to pick up”. Amazing how these true wireless earbuds all seems to have ovoid cases with magnetically closing flip-top lids. As if there were no other way to do it.
unique link to this extract


Errata, corrigenda and ai no corrida: none notified